BSL Acquisition and Assessment of Deaf Children - Part 2: Overview of BSL Assessments. Wolfgang Mann

Similar documents
MULTI-CHANNEL COMMUNICATION

Deaf children s reading compared with hearing dyslexic children

Overview of research findings on word decoding in deaf children

City, University of London Institutional Repository

Strategies for Building ASL Literacy

Putting research findings on deaf children's literacy into practice

LITERACY FOR DEAF CHILDREN: THE ESSENTIALS MARGARET HARRIS EMMANOUELA TERLEKTSI FIONA KYLE

Family-centered early intervention for families and children who are deaf or hard of hearing

Multi-modality in Language. Bencie Woll Deafness Cognition and Language Research Centre, UCL

Reading and Dyslexia in Deaf Children

BSL Level 3. Gary L Taylor

SCHOOL-BASED LANGUAGE COMPETENCY CHECKLISTS THIS SECTION SHOULD BE COMPLETED BY EACH EDUCATIONAL PLANNING TEAM MEMBER. SECTION 2:M

Adapting the Assessing British Sign Language Development: Receptive Skills Test Into American Sign Language

Profiling SLI in Deaf children who are sign language users. Authors: Rosalind Herman, Katherine Rowley, Chloë Marshall, Kathryn Mason,

Deaf children as bimodal bilinguals and educational implications

The Deaf Brain. Bencie Woll Deafness Cognition and Language Research Centre

The importance of a BSL primary user corpus for sign language teaching and learning

Coordinated Family Services Plan

Deafness Cognition and Language Research Centre

The neural basis of sign language processing

Making ASL/English Bilingualism Work in Your Home -A Guide for Parents and their EI Providers-

The BSL Sentence Reproduction Test: Exploring age of acquisition effects in British deaf adults

Areas to Address with All Families

Deaf Support. Level 3 British Sign Language 2017 Handout resources. 2 SIGN GRAMMAR Grammar is phonology + syntax + semantics It is the order of sign.

A Randomized- Controlled Trial of Foundations for Literacy

What is the Role of the Hearing Specialist in Early Steps? Karen Anderson, PhD Coordinator of Early Intervention Services for Hearing and Vision

A is not only for Apple: Through Early Accessible Language Instruction using a Bilingual Approach. EHDI Conference 2010 Chicago, g, IL

Implementing the Language Assessment Program for Children who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing

Using Cued Speech to Support Literacy. Karla A Giese, MA Stephanie Gardiner-Walsh, PhD Illinois State University

Identifying specific language impairment in deaf children acquiring British Sign Language: Implications for theory and practice

Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children s Visual Language and Developmental Checklist

Allen Independent School District Bundled LOTE Curriculum Beginning 2017 School Year ASL III

Interpreter Preparation (IPP) IPP 101 ASL/Non-IPP Majors. 4 Hours. Prerequisites: None. 4 hours weekly (3-1)

Attitudes, Accommodations and Advocacy, Oh My!

Interpreter Preparation (IPP) IPP 101 ASL/Non-IPP Majors. 4 Hours. Prerequisites: None. 4 hours weekly (3-1)

DOES EARLY SIGN LANGUAGE INPUT MAKE A DIFFERENCE ON DEAF CHILDREN WITH AUDITORY BRAINSTEM IMPLANTS?

Lexical Access in spoken languages

World Language Department - Cambridge Public Schools STAGE 1 - DESIRED RESULTS. Unit Goals Unit 1: Introduction to American Sign Language

Qualification Specification

Bimodal bilingualism: focus on hearing signers

Subject Group Overview. skills) Welcome Week None needed None needed None needed None needed None needed Learners will complete and (Week 1-7 days

Modeling the Use of Space for Pointing in American Sign Language Animation

ASL 102 American Sign Language II (4) Second in a related series of courses that focus on the use and study of ASL. This course

LANGUAGE ARTS AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE I COMPONENT. Volume I - Page 173 LANGUAGE ARTS - AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE I

Sign Language MT. Sara Morrissey

TVHS ASL 1: Unit 1 Study Guide Unit Test on:

American Sign Language II Topic Outline Course Description and Philosophy

Adapting Tests of Sign Language Assessment for Other Sign Languages A Review of Linguistic, Cultural, and Psychometric Problems

Improving Reading of Deaf and Hard of Hearing Children Through Technology Morocco

Confronting the language barrier: Theory of mind in deaf children

Rachel Rees, University College London Cate Calder, Cued Speech Association UK

Childhood memories (signed by Avril Langard-Tang) Worksheet

PROMOTION AND MAINTENANCE OF NEW ZEALAND SIGN LANGUAGE

NEW YORK STATE TEACHER CERTIFICATION EXAMINATIONS

CHARACTERISTICS OF STUDENTS WHO ARE: DEAF OR HARD OF HEARING

Critical Review: Late Talkers : What Can We Expect?

The Visual Communication and Sign Language Checklist: Online (VCSL:O) Part of the VL2 Online Assessment System

Poetry in South African Sign Language: What is different?

Psy /16 Human Communication. By Joseline

Professor Brenda Schick

City, University of London Institutional Repository

Background. What is a corpus? Why a corpus project of BSL? Documenting British Sign Language: The BSL Corpus Project

Communications Sciences & Disorders Course Descriptions

World Languages American Sign Language (ASL) Subject Matter Requirements

There is a perennial problem in studying children s

Amy M. Lieberman, Arielle Borovsky, Marla Hatrak, and Rachel I. Mayberry

Course Title: American Sign Language II-A. Meeting Times: 55 minutes, 4-5 X per week, 18 weeks (1 semester) Course Description

Grammaticalization of points in Nicaraguan signing

A p p e n d i c e s. Appendix A: Using the Curriculum

8.0 Guidance for Working with Deaf or Hard Of Hearing Students

Expanded Core Curriculum for Students Who Are Deaf or Hard of Hearing Assessment Matrix

American Sign Language (ASL)

COSD UNDERGRADUATE COURSES

FOUNDATIONS FOR LITERACY: AN EARLY LITERACY INTERVENTION FOR DHH CHILDREN

PST American Sign Language II This syllabus applies to PST and 04 Spring 2013 Three credits

SPANISH SPEAKING Arizona California Idaho Indiana Texas Wyoming

College of Health Sciences. Communication Sciences and Disorders

Happy! Who Are We? 3/9/2015

TIPS FOR TEACHING A STUDENT WHO IS DEAF/HARD OF HEARING

Introduction. What do the Census actually measure?

DEAF CULTURE AND THE DEAF COMMUNITY IT S MORE THAN SPEECH : CONSIDERATIONS WHEN WORKING WITH DEAF AND HARD OF HEARING INDIVIDUALS 9/21/2017

Scheme of Work for BSL Level 2 202

Repurposing Corpus Materials For Interpreter Education. Nancy Frishberg, Ph.D. MSB Associates San Mateo, California USA

Analysis of Visual Properties in American Sign Language

THE DEVELOPMENT OF PRAGMATICS IN CHILDREN WITH HEARING LOSS

One-Handed Simplified Signs 1. Memory and Recall of One-Handed Signs: The Development of a Simplified Sign System for Aphasic Patients with Hemiplegia

NON-NEGOTIBLE EVALUATION CRITERIA

How does iconicity affect sign language learning? Sandra Zerkle, Benjamin Bergen, Tyler Marghetis

NON-NEGOTIBLE EVALUATION CRITERIA

Running head: GENDER VARIATION IN AMERICAN SIGN LANGUAGE 1. Gender Variation in Sign Production by Users of American Sign Language

Smith, C., Lentz, E. M., & Mikos, K. (2014). Signing Naturally: Student Workbook, Units DawnSignPress. (ISBN: ).

The relationship between speechreading and reading in deaf children

Effective Communication: The ADA and Law Enforcement

Effective Communication: The ADA and Law Enforcement

British Sign Language Level 2 Online Course Evening

Model answers. Childhood memories (signed by Avril Langard-Tang) Introduction:

Accessible Computing Research for Users who are Deaf and Hard of Hearing (DHH)

Hearing Impaired K 12

YES. Davidson et al. (2013) Hassanzadeh et al. (2012) Rinaldi & Caselli (2014) Boons et al. (2012) Dettman et al. (2016) Dunn et al.

TITLE:&The"organisation"of"working"memory"networks"is"shaped"by"early"sensory"experience"

Transcription:

BSL Acquisition and Assessment of Deaf Children - Part 2: Overview of BSL Assessments Wolfgang Mann

A brief history Ê For a long time, language assessment of deaf children was rarely addressed by researchers. Common practice was to use and adapt tests designed for hearing children, or make more subjective assessments (Herman, 1998) Ê Although language tests designed for hearing children continue to be used in some situations, e.g. with oral deaf children who have received early cochlear implants, their use is not always appropriate

Problems with using or adapting test for hearing children 1. Standard test administration procedures may not meet the needs of a deaf child (e.g. rate of presentation, numbers of allowed repetitions, etc) 2. Language used in tests or individual test items may be unfamiliar to a deaf child or difficult to speechread 3. English- based tests cannot simply be translated into BSL or SSE (or any other language) and considered equivalent in terms of what they are measuring 4. Test norms have only limited validity when applied to deaf children whose language exposure and experience is often so different from those upon whom the test was developed

What is involved in developing language tests? Ê Developing language tests involves identifying appropriate areas to assess and determining patterns of typical development Ê This requires a large population from which to select a representative sample Ê However, deaf children, are a population that is both small and highly heterogeneous Ê In addition to factors such as onset of language and communication at home, there are growing numbers of children from minority backgrounds and children with additional disabilities

Consequences Ê Tests reporting deaf norms are generally based on fewer numbers than would be found in similar tests for hearing children Ê Although these smaller sample sizes represent a far larger proportion of the population of deaf children than is found in tests based on hearing children, their applicability to all deaf children requires careful consideration Ê Important that professionals who use language tests with deaf children take care when interpreting test results Ê Interpretation of test results should consider knowledge about individual child and their language experiences and extent to which these compare to children upon whom test norms are based

Available tests for BSL

1. The BSL Receptive Skills Test (Herman, Holmes & Woll, 1999) Ê Video- based test looking at comprehension of BSL sentences of increasing grammatical complexity Ê Children respond by selecting the most appropriate picture from a choice of three or four Ê Test is used widely in UK settings, including research Ê The test is now available online Ê For more info, contact R.C.Herman@city.ac.uk

2. The BSL Production Test (Herman, Grove, Holmes, Morgan, Sutherland & Woll, 2004) Ê Uses a story recall task to analyse narrative skills and grammatical development in BSL Ê Children watch a short, language free film and retell the story to a fluent signer. Norms are provided on deaf children aged 4-12 years acquiring BSL under optimal circumstances Ê For this test, attendance on a training course is necessary to become registered as a test user Ê For more info, contact R.C.Herman@city.ac.uk

3. BSL MacArthur CDI (Woolfe, Herman, Roy & Woll, 2009) Ê CDI= Communicative Development Inventories Ê Well established parent report tool that measures receptive/ productive vocabulary in children aged 8-30 months Ê Parents complete checklist to document their child s language development Ê The CDI have been translated into many spoken languages and a BSL version was developed with norms based on deaf native signers (8-36 months) Ê For more info, contact b.woll@ucl.ac.uk or R.C.Herman@city.ac.uk

http://www.ucl.ac.uk/hcs/research/ebsld/

4. Nonsense Sign Repetition Task (Mann, Marshall, Mason & Morgan, 2009) Ê Measures how deaf children between 3-11 years learn different aspects of phonology in BSL, e.g., handshape, path, and movement Ê Children watch single signs and have to repeat them Ê The test has been standardized and a trial version is available on request (Wolfgang.Mann@roehampton.ac.uk)

Example

5. Web- based BSL Vocabulary Test (Mann, 2008) Ê Assesses vocabulary development in deaf children aged 4-15 years using a combination of comprehension and production tasks Ê Measures both vocabulary size and vocabulary depth Ê Based on a model for second language learning

Format Ê Four tasks to assess degree of strength of vocabulary knowledge Ê Two receptive, two productive skills task Ê Each task consists of 120 items (same across tasks)

+ allow many different words to be tested + provide a measure of children s total vocabulary size - provide limited information on how robust children s vocabulary is

Vocabulary knowledge or Laufer, Elder, Hill, & Congdon, 2004; Laufer & Goldstein, 2004

cat meow orange animal purr Read, 2001

Form Recall Form Recognition Meaning Recall Meaning Recognition

SIGN INVENTORY

TUTORIALS

Contact Ê Wolfgang.Mann@roehampton.ac.uk Ê Thank you!