ONCOLOGY MEDICAL HOME ACCREDITATION

Similar documents
The New Role of Cancer Patient Engagement in Value Based Models

Breast Cancer Additional Reports

Breast Cancer Additional Reports

COMMISSION ON CANCER. Cancer Program Standards 2012: Ensuring Patient-Centered Care. v 1.2.1

Oncology Management at HAP. John Calabria, DO, Medical Director

Required Documents for 2018 Survey Application Record

Update of Cancer Programs. Scott H. Kurtzman, MD FACS

Member-centered cancer care In Georgia

2014 Medicare (and Private Insurance) Payment Reform for Oncology. Ensuring the Delivery of Quality & Value-Based Cancer Care

South West Regional Cancer Program. Cancer Plan

Ensuring the Delivery of Patient-Centered Cancer Care

Overview...3. Cancer Program.4. Breast Cancer with 5-year Survival Analysis...6. Systemic Therapy.7. Stage of Breast Cancer Diagnosed in

The New CP 3 R Application And Revisions To Standard 4.6 Integration Of The NCDB With The Accreditation Process

Innovation in Physician Payment and Organization for Cancer Care. Jennifer Malin, MD, PhD Medical Director, Oncology

The United States national accreditation program for breast centers: a model for excellence in breast disease evaluation and management

Leveraging Your Cancer Registry: A Strategy for Survey Success

How health plans can improve cancer care: from utilization management to delivery reform

Enhancing Quality of Life for Cancer Survivors in South Dakota. Outcomes from the South Dakota Cancer Survivorship Program

FORDS to STORE: The Evolution of Cancer Registry Coding Frederick L. Greene, MD FACS Medical Director, Cancer Data Services Levine Cancer Institute

NAPBC Standards. Continuum of Care for Breast Abnormalities. NAPBC Standards Manual. Cindy Burgin #70

Standards Deficiency Resolution

Evolution of CoC within ACoS. American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Current Activities and Future Initiatives November 5,2005

Maria Parham Cancer Center Henderson NC Annual Report 2013

The National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers American Program Considerations. Maurício Magalhães Costa Cary S. Kaufman February 9, 2012

Quality and Fiscal Metrics: What Proves Success?

Making the Most of Your Cancer Registry

MERCY UC DAVIS CANCER CENTER NEWSLETTER. Cancer Center News 2017 ANNUAL REPORT

Helen Burstin, MD, MPH, FACP Executive Vice President & CEO Council of Medical Specialty Societies. November 28, 2017 ECRI Annual Conference

Commission on Cancer Updates

Georgia Cancer Quality Information Exchange

The National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers American Program Considerations

2016 Annual Report. Based on 2016 Cancer Program Activities and 2015 Cancer Registry Data

Cancer Action Coalition of Virginia Report to the Governor, General Assembly, and the Joint Commission on Health Care.

2015 Cancer Program Public Report

Meeting CoC Standards

Working Together to Improve Cancer Outcomes. The American Cancer Society and the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer

Together... The Strength to Fight Cancer. Annual Cancer Report December 2014

Survivorship Clinics in Community Cancer Centers

General Information. Please silence cell phones. Locations Restrooms to the left of the ballroom, or to your right by the elevators

Caring for Survivors. Nancy Houlihan, RN, MA, AOCN. Cancer Survivorship Program

Cancer Center Dashboard

THE TEXAS CANCER PLAN KAREN TORGES CHAIR, CANCER ALLIANCE OF TEXAS

2018 CANCER PROGRAMS CONFERENCE PROSPECTUS LEARN INTERACT TRANSFORM. facs.org/cancerconference SEPTEMBER 5 7, 2018 CHICAGO, IL

CAPITAL HEALTH CENTER FOR ONCOLOGY. capitalhealth.org/oncology

Ruth McCorkle, PhD; Rebecca Kirch, JD; Kim Thiboldeaux; Julie Taylor; and Mark Gorman

Murtha Cancer Center The DoD Cancer Center of Excellence

62 accc-cancer.org January February 2016 OI

Establishing Effective Patient Navigation Programs in Oncology

Colorectal Cancer at the MemorialCare Todd Cancer Institute at Long Beach Memorial

2017 CANCER COMMITTEE ANNUAL REPORT

Exceptional cancer care, close to home.

Are we doing good yet? Assessing value in Oncology

Disclosures. Clinical Practice Guidelines: The Role of the Genetic Counselor. I have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

BREAST CANCER SITE STUDY REPORT By Robert O. Maganini, M.D., F.A.C.S. Breast Surgeon, Alexian Brothers Medical Group

2/12/2016. Disclosure. Objectives. The Hospice Medical Director: What Should They Be Doing?

One Palliative Care Annual Report

GATRA/GCCR Fall Conference 14 16, /13/2012. Integration of the Rapid Quality Reporting. System (RQRS) and Patient Navigation

PCPI Update Progress on Strategic Initiatives

Incorporating a Survivorship Clinic/Visit Into Practice

Samantha A. Carlson, LMSW OSW-C Director of Social Services Kalamazoo, MI

Message from Leadership

National Cancer Institute Clinical Trial Cooperative Groups

The Current Landscape of Nurse Navigators: Oncology and the Impact on Outcomes

KAISER PERMANENTE ANNUAL CANCER REPORT 2016 MEDICAL CENTER SAN FRANCISCO THE PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP COMMISSION ON CANCER COMMITTEE DECEMBER 2016

BETTER WAYS TO PAY FOR CANCER CARE Creating Win-Win-Win Approaches for Oncologists, Cancer Patients, and Payers

Please submit all questions concerning webinar content through the Q&A panel. Reminder:

RHODE ISLAND CANCER PREVENTION AND CONTROL

Uniting The Wellness Community and Gilda s Club Worldwide

Breast Cancer Management 2018

Together... The Strength to Fight Cancer. Annual Cancer Report December 2014

Tailoring Cancer Survivorship Treatment Summaries and Care Plans in the Era of Patient Centered Care

ANNUAL REPORT ONCOLOGY SERVICES. With you for life. A Member of the Montefiore Health System

The Commission on Cancer: Reengineering the National Cancer Data Base

Reaching Out Model Programs Fact Sheet

PROMEDICA MONROE REGIONAL HOSPITAL Annual Report

A Model of Shared-Care of the Cancer Survivor. Mary S. McCabe

Distress Screening: Essential Quality Care

THE COST DRIVERS OF CANCER CARE

Summa Health Cancer Institute Outcomes Report

St. Mary s Hospital Foundation Scholarship Program. Deadline: Must be postmarked by March 15, 2016

The Psychosocial Services Coordinator

Palliative care services and home and community care services inquiry

Skin Cancer Screening

NATIONAL HEALTH POLICY FORUM

Evolution of the Oncology Landscape. Emerging Trends and Focus on Value

Figure 1. Survivorship Program Model

Lung Cancer Program. at Stamford Hospital

Section #3: Process of Change

2018 CANCER COMMITTEE PUBLIC REPORTING OUTCOMES

Palliative Care and Hospice in an Accountable Care Model. Key Strategies to a Successful Integrated Delivery System

GILSBAR GROUP HEALTH PLAN S2202 OPTION 2 NON-GRANDFATHERED PLAN BENEFIT SHEET

REPORT. A Model Clinical Trials System for the 21st Century

National Cancer Peer Review Programme

The Academy Capitol Forum: Meet the Experts. Diagnosing Which Health Treatments Improve Outcomes: A PCORI Overview and How to Get Involved

Developing and Implementing Standards for Psychosocial Care of Adults with Cancer

National Capital Chapter

The Quality and Value Proposition for Palliative Care in Home Care. Madeline Jacobs, MPA HCA Quality and Technology Symposium November 16, 2017

Adaptation of Survivorship Care Plans in the Age of the EMR Challenges & Practical Solutions

Creating a Survivorship Model of Care

ANNUAL REPORT. Figure 2 displays the distribution of the number of these diagnoses in 2013 by age (along the X axis) and by gender.

Transcription:

2015 Community Oncology Alliance 1 ONCOLOGY MEDICAL HOME ACCREDITATION Panel Moderator: Bo Gamble Director of Strategic Practice Initiatives, Community Oncology Alliance 1

ONCOLOGY MEDICAL HOME ACCREDITATION MODERATOR: BO GAMBLE Daniel McKellar, MD, FACS, Chair, Commission on Cancer Charles Bane, MD, Dayton Physicians Network Brian Bourbeau, Director, Organizational Effectiveness, Oncology Hematology Care Marsha Devita, RN, NP, Chief Clinical Officer, Hematology Oncology Associates of CNY Tammy Chambers, Director of Contracting, The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders October 27, 2015 Hyatt Regency Tysons Corner Center, Virginia 2015 Community Oncology Alliance 3 Oncology Medical Home (OMH) Accreditation Program Update Daniel P. McKellar, MD, FACS Chair, Commission on Cancer American American College College of of Surgeons 2013 Content 2014 Content cannot be be reproduced or or repurposed without written permission of of the the American American College College of Surgeons. of Surgeons. 2

OMH Accreditation Program Update Why the CoC? Ø 80 years of experience accrediting cancer programs Comprehensive Patient-Centered standards Leader in quality metric development and implementation Ø Significant infrastructure in place Well trained knowledgeable staff Trained and experienced surveyor team Extensive experience with data on cancer patients (NCDB) Numerous educational programs for cancer programs Ø National recognition for accrediting cancer programs 5 Commission on Cancer: Our Mission The CoC is a consortium of professional organizations dedicated to improving survival and quality of life for cancer patients through standardsetting, prevention, research, education, and the monitoring of comprehensive quality care. 6 3

Commission on Cancer Membership 56 professional organization representatives Administrative: Advocacy/Patient Based: American Cancer Society, Cancer Support Community, Community Oncology Alliance, LIVESTRONG, National Coalition for Cancer Survivorship Allied Health: Academy of Oncology Nurse and Patient Navigators, American Academy of Hospice and Palliative Medicine, Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics, American Psychosocial Oncology Society, Association of Oncology Social Work, National Society of Genetic Counselors, Oncology Nursing Society Clinical: American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians & Gynecologists, American College of Physicians, American College of Radiology, American College of Surgeons Resident & Associate Society, American College of Surgeons Young Fellows Association, American Head & Neck Society, American Medical Association, American Pediatric Surgical Association, American Radium Society, American Society of Breast Surgeons, American Society of Clinical Oncology, American Society of Colon & Rectal Surgeons, American Society of Radiation Oncology, American Urological Association, College of American Pathologists, Hematology and Oncology Pharmacy Association, Society for the Immunotherapy of Cancer, Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, Society of Nuclear Medicine, Society of Surgical Oncology, Society of Thoracic Surgeons 7 Commission on Cancer Membership 56 professional organization representatives Government: Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Department of Defense, Department of Veterans Affairs, National Cancer Institute, Applied Research Program, National Cancer Institute SEER Program Registry: National Cancer Registrars Association, North American Association of Central Cancer Registries Research/Education: Alliance Clinical Research Program, American Association for Cancer Education, American Joint Committee on Cancer, Association of American Cancer Institutes, National Accreditation Program for Breast Centers, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, National Surgical Adjuvant Breast & Bowel Project 8 4

OMH Accreditation Program Update Progress to date Ø Workgroup established and developed standards and quality measures Ø Initial pilot surveys completed in 10 oncology practices Ø Standards manual finalized 9 OMH Accreditation Program Update Next Steps Ø Open accreditation program to 20-30 practices in 2016 Ø Recruit and train surveyor team Ø Continue to seek input from stakeholders to ensure standards are meaningful Ø Further refine standards Ø Develop database to demonstrate compliance with quality measures Ø Finalize an electronic application process 10 5

OMH Accreditation Survey Process Ø Practices submit an application to verify readiness for accreditation Ø Practices complete the Survey Application Record (SAR) Ø Documentation to support compliance with standards Ø Survey practices on-site by surveyor (medical oncologist) Ø Surveyor report submitted to CoC staff who do a quality assurance review Ø Performance Report is provided to practices 11 OMH Accreditation Survey Process Ø Any deficiencies must be resolved by practice within 12 months of receipt of Performance Report Ø Potential accreditation award: ü Three-year full accreditation ü Three-year accreditation with contingency ü Non-accreditation 12 6

OMH Accreditation Survey Process OMH Education and Support Ø Detailed standards manual Ø OMH Accreditation 101 Seminar-Extensive review of standards and presentations by knowledgeable experts Ø Webinars Ø Examples of best practices Ø Consultant program to assist practices in transforming into an OMH 13 OMH Standards Ø Eligibility Requirement criteria similar to CoC criteria Ø Five Chapters 1. Patient Engagement 2. Expanded Access 3. Evidence-Based Medicine 4. Comprehensive Team-Based Care 5. Quality Improvement 14 7

Chapter 1: Patient Engagement Standard 1.1: All patients are provided education on the Oncology Medical Home practice and concept. Standard 1.2: Patient financial counseling services are available within the Oncology Medical Home practice. Standard 1.3: All patients are provided with education on their cancer diagnosis and an individualized treatment plan. Standard 1.4: The Oncology Medical Home practice provides a secure patient portal. Standard 1.5: Oncology nursing care is provided by nurses with specialized knowledge and skills. Nursing competency is evaluated each calendar year. 15 15 Chapter 2: Expanded Access Standard 2.1: Oncology Medical Home practices institute a triage system and expanded access to ensure that patients can easily access the practice and their providers. Triage system infrastructure and policies to be formulated and reviewed by the POC must include: Extended hours and weekend availability to manage patient issues and reduce ED visits and hospitalizations (weekend infusions, injections, extended practice hours, and on-call physician access) At least one oncologist on call overnight and on weekends to manage emergencies Urgent and emergency patient access for new and established patients Availability to schedule same-day appointments for patients requiring urgent care Accommodation of walk-in patients Policy and procedures for direct admissions (bypassing the ED when medically appropriate) Specific policies and procedures that expedite appointments for new patients. These policies and procedures should include a provision for urgent scheduling of appointments based on medical need or patient anxiety. 16 8

Chapter 3: Evidence-Based Medicine Standard 3.1: Evidence-based treatment guidelines and/or pathways are used for treatment planning. Standard 3.2: Patients are provided clinical research study information by the Oncology Medical Home practice and the required percentages of patients are accrued to clinical trials each calendar year. 17 17 Chapter 4: Comprehensive Team-Based Care Standard 4.1: A medical oncologist directs the patient s care team within the Oncology Medical Home practice and manages or co-manages the inpatient team-based care. Standard 4.2: The Oncology Medical Home practice establishes relationships for effective communication with outside providers for the appropriate management of patient care. Standard 4.3: The Oncology Medical Home practice shares diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up data on mutual patients with Commission on Cancer accredited cancer programs. Standard 4.4: All patients are provided on-site psychosocial distress screening and referral for the provision of psychosocial care, as needed. Standard 4.5: The Oncology Medical Home practice develops and implements a process to disseminate a treatment summary and survivorship care plan to patients within 90 days of the completion of treatment. 18 18 9

Chapter 5: Quality Improvement Standard 5.1: Each calendar year, the Oncology Medical Home practice records, reviews, and monitors completeness of clinical data for initiating quality improvement activities. Standard 5.2: Each calendar year, the Oncology Medical Home practice administers a patient satisfaction survey to cancer patients at least twice each calendar year. The results of the survey are analyzed and used to guide quality improvement activities. Standard 5.3: Each calendar year, the Oncology Medical Home Practice develops, analyzes, and documents at least one quality improvement study associated with improving clinical outcomes and implements at least one quality improvement based on study results. 19 19 QUALITY MEASURES 20 20 10

QUALITY MEASURES 21 21 Commitment to oncology care High quality Efficient Why OMH accreditation? New payment reform model Patient satisfaction Improving access and coordination of care Improving patient education and support 22 11

What can practices do now? ü Implement OMH patient satisfaction survey Simple and helps with baselines ü Develop policies and procedures for the OMH standards ü Know, understand and promote your own baseline quality and value. ü Improve your baseline quality and value. ü Notify the CoC of your interest in becoming an accredited Oncology Medical Home OMHaccreditation@facs.org 23 QUESTIONS? 24 12

ONCOLOGY MEDICAL HOME ACCREDITATION MODERATOR: BO GAMBLE Daniel McKellar, MD, FACS, Chair, Commission on Cancer Charles Bane, MD, Dayton Physicians Network Brian Bourbeau, Director, Organizational Effectiveness, Oncology Hematology Care Marsha Devita, RN, NP, Chief Clinical Officer, Hematology Oncology Associates of CNY Tammy Chambers, Director of Contracting, The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders October 27, 2015 Hyatt Regency Tysons Corner Center, Virginia 2015 Community Oncology Alliance 25 Ñ Staffing : 33 Physicians Ó Medical Oncology : 18 Ó Radiation Oncology : 7 Ó Urology : 8 Ó Advance Practice Providers : 8 Ó Employed staff : 350 Ñ Sites of service Ó Six Cancer Centers in Southwest Ohio Dayton Physicians Network 13

Ñ Payment reform initiatives Ó UHC Episode Fee Payment Program Ó Medicare COME HOME Pilot Ó Anthem Cancer Care Quality Program Ó Aetna OMH Pilot Dayton Physicians Network ONCOLOGY MEDICAL HOME ACCREDITATION MODERATOR: BO GAMBLE Daniel McKellar, MD, FACS, Chair, Commission on Cancer Charles Bane, MD, Dayton Physicians Network Brian Bourbeau, Director, Organizational Effectiveness, Oncology Hematology Care Marsha Devita, RN, NP, Chief Clinical Officer, Hematology Oncology Associates of CNY Tammy Chambers, Director of Contracting, The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders October 27, 2015 Hyatt Regency Tysons Corner Center, Virginia 2015 Community Oncology Alliance 28 14

11/2/15 OHC 18 locations Payment Reform 34 Medical Oncologists 22 Advanced Practice Providers 14 Radiation Oncologists 38 Nurse Navigators 2 Gynecologic Oncologists 8 Financial Navigators 37,000 patients OHC Clinical Care Model Accreditation Oncology Medical Home Comprehensive Care & Patient Navigation Evidence -Based Access Care Planning Oral Chemo Mgmt Survivorship VIA Pathways Sat/Sun Clinic Patient Education Advance Directives Financial Navigation Triage Pathways Urgent Visits Laboratory Services 15

ONCOLOGY MEDICAL HOME ACCREDITATION MODERATOR: BO GAMBLE Daniel McKellar, MD, FACS, Chair, Commission on Cancer Charles Bane, MD, Dayton Physicians Network Brian Bourbeau, Director, Organizational Effectiveness, Oncology Hematology Care Marsha Devita, RN, NP, Chief Clinical Officer, Hematology Oncology Associates of CNY Tammy Chambers, Director of Contracting, The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders October 27, 2015 Hyatt Regency Tysons Corner Center, Virginia 2015 Community Oncology Alliance 31 16

ONCOLOGY MEDICAL HOME ACCREDITATION MODERATOR: BO GAMBLE Daniel McKellar, MD, FACS, Chair, Commission on Cancer Charles Bane, MD, Dayton Physicians Network Brian Bourbeau, Director, Organizational Effectiveness, Oncology Hematology Care Marsha Devita, RN, NP, Chief Clinical Officer, Hematology Oncology Associates of CNY Tammy Chambers, Director of Contracting, The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders October 27, 2015 Hyatt Regency Tysons Corner Center, Virginia 2015 Community Oncology Alliance 34 17

Our Prac(ce 19 Physicians - Medical Oncology, Hematology, RadiaBon Oncology, Gynecologic Oncology, and Breast Surgery 7 Advance PracBBoners 9 LocaBons - Dallas/FTW Region Scope of Services Research, Chemotherapy, RadiaBon Therapy, DiagnosBc Imaging, Cyberknife, Retail Pharmacy, and Host of Support Services Payer Reform Ini(a(ves Aetna OPCMH CMMI COME HOME United Healthcare Episode OCM applicabon submixed Accredita(on / Quality Ini(a(ves Commission on Cancer (CoC) OMH AccreditaBon QOPI CerBfied PQRS Driver Diagram For Oncology Medical Home Prac(ce Transforma(on 18

Ñ Oncology Medical Home Ó Opportunities Ô Clinical enhanced care, patient satisfaction Ô Operational patient centered, culture shift Ô Financial cost avoidance, enhanced value Ó Challenges Ô Clinical acute issues, increased complexity Ô Operational increased and variable demands Ô Financial practice burden, inadequate reimbursement Dayton Physicians Network ONCOLOGY MEDICAL HOME ACCREDITATION MODERATOR: BO GAMBLE Daniel McKellar, MD, FACP, Chair, Commission on Cancer Charles Bane, MD, Dayton Physicians Network Brian Bourbeau, Director, Organizational Effectiveness, Oncology Hematology Care Marsha Devita, RN, NP, Chief Clinical Officer, Hematology Oncology Associates of CNY Tammy Chambers, Director of Contracting, The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders October 27, 2015 Hyatt Regency Tysons Corner Center, Virginia 2015 Community Oncology Alliance 38 19