The Hallmarks of BPH Progression and Risk Factors

Similar documents
BPH: a present and future perspective on health impact

α-blocker Monotherapy and α-blocker Plus 5-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitor Combination Treatment in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia; 10 Years Long-Term Results

Therapeutic Strategies for Managing BPH Progression

Department of Urology, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX

Increasing Awareness, Diagnosis, and Treatment of BPH, LUTS, and EP

The Evolution of Combination Therapy. US men eligible for BPH treatment * with projected population changes

Prostate Gland Volume and Its Relationship to Complications of Benign Prostatic Enlargement

The Enlarged Prostate Symptoms, Diagnosis and Treatment

Shrestha A, Chalise PR, Sharma UK, Gyawali PR, Shrestha GK, Joshi BR. Department of Surgery, TU Teaching Hospital, Maharajgunj, Kathmandu, Nepal

NIH Public Access Author Manuscript J Urol. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2010 May 4.

REVIEW The utility of serum prostatic-specific antigen in the management of men with benign prostatic hyperplasia

Can men with prostates sized 80 ml or larger be managed conservatively?

VOIDING DYSFUNCTION IN ELDERLY MALE CURRENT STATUS

Chapter 4: Research and Future Directions

REPORTS. Clinical and Economic Outcomes in Patients Treated for Enlarged Prostate

How Do New Data from Clinical Trials Allow Us to Optimise the Assessment and Treatment of Patients with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia?

Male LUTS, OAB, Sex: natural history. JR Sathiya

The Journal of International Medical Research 2012; 40:

Hyoung Woo Kim, Dae Geun Moon, Hyun Min Kim, Jong Ho Hwang, Soon Chan Kim, Sam Geuk Nam, Jun Tag Park

The Relationship Between Prostate Volume, Prostate- Specific Antigen and Age in Saudi Men with Benign Prostatic Conditions

MANAGING BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERTROPHY IN PRIMARY CARE DR GEORGE G MATHEW CONSULTANT FAMILY PHYSICIAN FELLOW IN SEXUAL & REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH

Guideline for the primary care management of male lower urinary tract symptoms

Abstract. Key words Trial without catheter, Acute urinary retention, Benign prostatic hyperplasia, Introduction

During the past decade, numerous

Storage Irritative) and Voiding Obstructive) Symptoms as Predictors of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Progression and Related Outcomes

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Enlarged Prostate Guidelines: How They Can Be Useful to Primary Care

Low Incidence of Acute Urinary Retention in the General Male Population: TheTriumph Project

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH):

Diagnostic approach to LUTS in men. Prof Dato Dr. Zulkifli Md Zainuddin Consultant Urologist / Head Of Urology Unit UKM Medical Center

Serum Prostate-Specific Antigen as a Predictor of Prostate Volume in the Community: The Krimpen Study

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Jay Lee, MD, FRCSC Clinical Associate Professor University of Calgary

RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN AMERICAN UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATION SYMPTOM INDEX, PROSTATE VOLUME, PATIENTS WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Key words: Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS), Prostatic Hyperplasia, Alpha-1 Adrenoceptor Antagonists, Tamsulosin, Terazosin.

Optimising the Medical Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

The population of subjects which was statistically analyzed was the Intent-to-Treat population

BPH: Social Impact and Patient s Perspective

Index. urologic.theclinics.com. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

EAU GUIDELINES POCKET EDITION 3

NOTE: This policy is not effective until April 1, Transurethral Water Vapor Thermal Therapy of the Prostate

Combination Drug Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH)

LONG-TERM SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF TAMSULOSIN FOR THE TREATMENT OF LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS ASSOCIATED WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA

Medical Therapy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Present and Future Impact

Alpha-BlockerTherapy Can Be Withdrawn in the Majority of Men Following Initial CombinationTherapy with the Dual 5a-Reductase Inhibitor Dutasteride

Evaluation of Recent Trends in Treatment Patterns Among Men With Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

A Study of Relationship of Prostate Volume, Prostate Specific Antigen and age in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

BPH with persistently elevated PSA 아주대학교김선일

Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) Important Papers / Landmark. Vijayan Manogran

Office Management of Benign Prostatic Enlargement

DrugTreatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia and Hospital Admission for BPH-Related Surgery

Dichotomous Estimation of Prostate Volume: A Diagnostic Study of the Accuracy of the Digital Rectal Examination

50% of men. 90% of men PATIENT FACTSHEET: BPH CONDITION AND TREATMENTS. Want more information? What are the symptoms?

ISSN: (Print) (Online) Journal homepage:

PATIENT INFORMATION 2017 NeoTract, Inc. All rights reserved. Printed in the USA. MAC Rev A

Alpha antagonists from initial concept to routine clinical practice

Effect of Transurethral Resection of the Prostate Based on the Degree of Obstruction Seen in Urodynamic Study

OVER 70% OF MEN IN THEIR 60s HAVE SYMPTOMS OF BPH 1

LUTS after TURP: How come and how to manage? Matthias Oelke

As man draws near the common goal Can anything be sadder Than he who, master of his soul Is servant to his bladder LUTS 2. Prevalence of BPH LUTS 5

Management of LUTS. Simon Woodhams February 2012

Elements for a Public Summary

Evidence-based guidelines in lower urinary tract symptoms secondary to benign prostatic hyperplasia and variation in care

A SURVEY ON LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS (LUTS) AMONG PATIENTS WITH BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA (BPH) IN HOSPITAL UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA (HUSM)

chronic kidney disease in community-dwelling men

DOWNLOAD OR READ : TREATMENT OF BENIGN PROSTATIC HYPERPLASIA PDF EBOOK EPUB MOBI

Title of Research Thesis:

Chapter 3: Results of the Treatment Outcomes Analyses

Overview. Urology Dine and Learn: Erectile Dysfunction & Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia. Iain McAuley September 15, 2014

Benign Prostatic Hypertrophy (BPH) is the most

PRABHAKAR SINGH*, MANOJ INDURKAR, AMITA SINGH, PALLAVI INDURKAR

Single Technology Appraisal (STA) Tadalafil for the treatment of symptoms associated with benign prostatic hyperplasia

What can the primary care physician do? Brian W. Ellis

The role of bladder diverticula in the prevalence of acute urinary retention in patients with BPH who are candidates

Korean Urologist s View of Practice Patterns in Diagnosis and Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Nationwide Survey

INTEROBSERVER VARIATION OF PROSTATIC VOLUME ESTIMATION WITH DIGITAL RECTAL EXAMINATION BY UROLOGICAL STAFFS WITH DIFFERENT EXPERIENCES

H6D-MC-LVHR Clinical Study Report Synopsis Page LVHR Synopsis (LY450190)

The Royal Marsden. Prostate case study. Presented by Mr Alan Thompson Consultant Urological Surgeon

REVIEW The role of combination medical therapy in benign prostatic hyperplasia

MMM. Topic The use of Tadalafil 5mg daily for the treatment of BPH-LUTS

The Relationship between Prostate Inflammation and Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms: Examination of Baseline Data from the REDUCE Trial

The potential for NX-1207 in benign prostatic hyperplasia: an update for clinicians

The Risk of Fracture with Taking Alpha Blockers for Treating Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia

Will Medical Management of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Result in Better or Worse Sexual Function in Men?

Tzu Chi Medical Journal

Current drug management of BPH in primary care Claire Taylor MRCS, Charlotte Foley MRCS and Roger Kirby MA, MD, FRCS Urol

AssociationbetweenSocieoeconomicVariablesSEVandBenignProstaticHyperplasiaBPHamongSudanesePatients

The patient, your co-pilot in assessing LUTS

Prevalence of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on Jeju Island: Analysis from a Cross-sectional Community-based Survey

Impact of 5-Alpha Reductase Inhibitors Treatment for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia on Erectile Dysfunction: A Meta-Analysis

TABLE 1. Differential Diagnosis of Symptomatic BPH* Category Cause of BPH Comments Malignant Adenocarcinoma of the prostate, transitional Men should b

EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF TADALAFIL IN IMPROVING LOWER URINARY TRACT SYMPTOMS IN PATIENTS WITH SYMPTOMATIC BENIGN PROSTATIC ENLARGEMENT

MEDICAL THERAPY. Endocrine Approaches. Página 1 de 5.

European Urology 48 (2005)

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS) and Nurse-Led Clinics. Sean Diver Urology Advanced Nurse Practitioner candidate Letterkenny University Hospital

BPH / LUTS. Prevalence. Prevalence of BPH. It is abnormal NOT to have benign growth of the prostate with increasing age. Prevalence.

Do 5a-Reductase Inhibitors Alter Prostate Cancer Detection and What Are the Implications?

Prostate Disease. Chad Baxter, MD

Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms K Kuruvilla Zachariah Associate Specialist

Recommended drug treatment of BPH in primary care Claire Taylor MRCS, Charlotte Foley MRCS and Roger Kirby MA, MD, FRCS Urol

Transcription:

European Urology Supplements European Urology Supplements 2 (23) 2 7 The Hallmarks of BPH Progression and Risk Factors M. Emberton * Institute of Urology and Nephrology, University College London, 48 Riding Street, London W1P 3AA, UK Abstract A review of selected literature from population studies and also from the placebo arm of large, randomised, double-blind clinical trials was conducted in order to identify evidence for progression of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), and to identify possible markers for the risk of progression. Population studies reported that, overall, the severity of lower urinary tract symptoms and prostate size increases with patient age, with a concomitant diminution in peak urinary flow rates. Similarly, the risk of acute urinary retention (AUR) increases with age. These changes are often accompanied by a reduction in the quality of life of both the patient and his family. Data from the placebo arm of the Proscar Long-term Efficacy and Safety Study have shown that all of these changes are correlated with increases in serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels. It has also been shown that serum PSA levels are a reliable predictor of BPH progression and, as such, can be used to guide treatment decisions. Other predictors of BPH progression include prostate size, obstructive symptom score and peak urinary flow rates. Effective management of BPH will become increasingly important as its prevalence rises in line with the ageing population. More information is required on the value that men place on reducing the long-term progression of BPH and thus, to what extent they are willing to trade off the speed of symptom relief for a reduction in AUR or surgery. # 23 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. Keywords: BPH; Disease progression; Risk factors; PSA; Age; Quality of life 1. Introduction It is well established from a large number of studies that the prevalence of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) increases linearly with age. In these studies, BPH was defined histologically by micronodularity in the transitional zone of the prostate gland, although this is not directly linked to the downstream consequences of progression. Where the condition occurs, it is likely to increase over time, resulting in an age-related impact of symptoms requiring pharmacological or surgical intervention [1]. The increase in life-expectancy that has been observed over the last 5 years has resulted in the ageing of the global population. It is expected that the world population aged over 65 years will double between 198 and 25 [2] and that approximately 15% of the population (1 million people) worldwide will be elderly by 25. This increase in the ageing * Tel. þ44-27-38-9852; Fax: þ44-27-637-776. E-mail address: memberton@dial.pipex.com (M. Emberton). population will, therefore, have a significant impact upon the incidence and prevalence of BPH. 2. The evidence for BPH progression A number of studies have provided a good evidence base to chart the process of change in downstream consequences of BPH, and have established the progressive nature of the disease [3]. The most comprehensive of these is the ongoing Olmsted County Study. An important feature of this study is the provision of continual updates, which improve the quality of the data as the study matures. Other sources of data on the progression of BPH are the placebo arms of large, randomised clinical studies, such as the Proscar Longterm Efficacy and Safety Study (PLESS), and also cross-sectional studies. These studies have used a number of different parameters as evidence for the progression of BPH, including increased symptom severity, reduced urinary flow, increased prostate volume, increased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) 1569-956/$ see front matter # 23 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. doi:1.116/j.eursup.23.9.8

M. Emberton / European Urology Supplements 2 (23) 2 7 3 levels, decreased quality of life and increased risk of acute urinary retention (AUR) with or without the requirement for surgery. The Olmsted County Study, which was initiated in 199, has studied outcomes in a randomly selected cohort of 2115 community-dwelling men (aged 4 79 years) in Olmsted County, Minnesota, USA, and data are now available from 12 years of follow-up. The study has recorded an average increase in scores on the American Urological Association Symptom Index (AUA-SI) of.18 points per year [4]. However, the most dramatic increase in symptom severity has been observed among men aged 6 69 years (Fig. 1). The apparent decrease in the rate of change that has been observed in men over 7 years of age may be due to either accommodation, failure or decompensation of the bladder at this time, with the result that urge is not manifested in the same way as at younger ages. Other noteworthy findings from the Olmsted County Study include a diminution of 2% per year in peak urinary flow rates with increasing age [5], and a median increase in prostate size of 1.9% per year related to baseline prostate volume [6]. PLESS involved a total of 34 men with an enlarged prostate, moderate-to-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and a decreased urinary flow rate, who were treated in a randomised, double-blind manner with finasteride 5 mg/day or placebo for 4 years [7]. For those men who were assigned to the placebo arm, prostate volume increased by 14% over the 4-year study period (Fig. 2); however, no deterioration in LUTS or urinary flow rate was observed during this time. This linear change from baseline might be extrapolated to the life-expectancy of the patient. The painful condition of AUR may occur spontaneously in men with BPH or be precipitated by surgery, anaesthesia or certain drugs. Among men with BPH in the Olmsted County Study, the cumulative incidence of AUR increased linearly with increasing age, and a dramatic 1-fold increase was seen when men aged 7 79 years with moderate-to-severe symptom scores were compared with their counterparts aged 4 49 years [8]. Long-term consequences of BPH may include variables other than outlet resistance or obstruction. For example, residual urine after mictruition or increased bladder wall thickness may develop as a consequence of BPH. Blood flow and oxygen delivery to the bladder may also be diminished, particularly in the last third of voiding against an obstructed outlet, and this in turn can result in reperfusion injury [9] to the bladder and lead to detrusor instability. Changes in renal function and urodynamic profile may prove useful in assessing BPH progression. 3. The economic and personal impact of BPH The symptoms and complications of BPH account for a large proportion of the workload of urologists, and they also interfere in the daily activities of patients to produce a negative impact on quality of life. The economic impact of BPH progression via loss of 2. Change in AUA Symptom Index from baseline 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1..8.6.4.2 * 4 49 5 59 * 6 69 * 7 79 4 79 Age (years) Fig. 1. Changes in BPH symptom severity with age in the Olmsted County Study [4] (*p < :1 vs. baseline).

4 M. Emberton / European Urology Supplements 2 (23) 2 7 2 Prostate volume (mean % change from baseline) 1 1 2 Baseline* 1 2 Years 3 4 Fig. 2. Mean percentage increase in prostate volume over 4 years among men in the placebo arm of the PLESS trial (*mean prostate volume ¼ 41.4 ml). Reproduced with permission from McConnell JD et al. N Engl J Med 1998:338;557 563. productivity can be severe. For example, it has been estimated that a man with hourly urinary frequency, taking 1 minutes per visit, will lose 1 hour per day or 15% of his working time. Increasing symptom severity is associated with a decrease in several aspects of quality of life, particularly disease-specific measures such as bother and interference with daily activities (Fig. 3) [1]. In a study performed in Scotland, Garraway et al. [11] found that men with LUTS resulting from BPH were twice as likely to report alterations in the activities of daily life, such as limiting fluid intake before travel and bedtime, having insufficient sleep, avoiding places without toilets, restricted participation in outdoor sports and in visits to places like theatres, cinemas and churches. While BPH is not in itself a life-threatening condition. One of its established symptoms, nocturia, although seemingly benign, is associated with increased morbidity in the elderly due to fractures incurred when falling [12]. Chronic conditions such as BPH also affect individuals other than the patient. For example, the partners of men with BPH may suffer greater impairment of their quality of life than the patient himself, as the condition disrupts normal family life and potentially disrupts sleeping patterns for the patient s partner. The impact increases with severity and nearly all partners experience fatigue, worry and social inconvenience, together with anxiety about cancer and surgery [13]. 4. Predicting BPH progression The major risk factors for the progression of BPH that have been validated are age, prostate volume and PSA levels [3]. Other predictors include reduced urine flow, increased symptom score and increased bother, which drive the health-seeking behaviour. However, a reliable single predictor of the development of bothersome LUTS, AUR or other complications, such as urinary tract infections, bladder stones or renal decompensation would be of obvious value to urologists, and would reduce the need to measure prostate volume and other variables. A good predictor of risk would alert the physician to the presence of an enlarged prostate or of a prostate that was likely to increase in size, as well as to identify patient likely to develop LUTS, poor flow or to suffer AUR and/or require surgery. It would also provide patients with information that may help in making decisions on treatment. PLESS has demonstrated that PSA is an indicator of all these, albeit with differing degrees of sensitivity and with age as an important covariate [14]. Strong evidence for the relationship between PSA and prostate volume has been demonstrated in PLESS. This study of 4627 patients showed that prostate volume is strongly correlated with serum PSA in men with BPH but with no evidence of prostate cancer, in an age-dependent log-linear relationship [14]. It was concluded that this correlation is close enough for serum PSA to be used for accurate estimation of

M. Emberton / European Urology Supplements 2 (23) 2 7 5.5 Symptom score None = Mild = 1 7 Mod/severe = 8 35 Age-adusted means on 1 scale.4.3.2.1 Degree of bother Degree of interference Degree of worry PGWB scale Sexual worry Sexual satisfaction Fig. 3. Correlation between symptom severity and poor quality of life in men with BPH. Reproduced with permission from Girman CJ et al. Urology 1994;44:825 831. prostatic enlargement as a guide for therapeutic decisions. PSA can also be used as a predictor of future prostate growth [15]. Thus, for men in the placebo arm of the PLESS, those with PSA values in the first tertile (.2 1.3 ng/ml) showed increases from baseline of less than 3% over the 4 years of the trial, whereas those in the third tertile (3.3 12 ng/ml) had an increase in prostate volume of over 13% (Fig. 4) [15]. Serum PSA is less precise when used as a predictor of peak urinary flow. Nevertheless, those men in PLESS with low PSA levels maintained their flow rate well, whilst those with higher levels showed a trend towards decreasing flow over 48 months [16]. Similarly, PLESS found some evidence of a relationship between serum PSA and symptom outcomes in the placebo arm, assessed using a quasi-aua-si. There was a statistically significant decrease in symptom scores in all groups at 12 months, and this effect was maintained with a continuing downward trend in symptom scores in those with low baseline PSA values (<1.2 ng/ml) [16]. However, in subjects with serum PSA levels 1.3 ng/ml, there was a steady increase in symptom scores toward baseline values at 4 years. A clear correlation exists between serum PSA levels and the risk both of experiencing AUR or requiring BPH-related surgery [17]. Thus, in the placebo arm of the PLESS, 6.2% of men in the low PSA tertile required surgery, compared with 9.9% and 14.6% of men in the middle and upper tertiles, respectively, during the 4 years of the study [17]. Similarly, an episode of AUR was experienced by 2.9% and 5.8% of men in the low and middle tertiles, respectively, but by 11.6% of those in the high serum PSA tertile, thereby establishing PSA as a powerful predictor of AUR. Models for predicting progression include algorithms and single risk factors, as well as the fivevariable model, which encompasses the indices of serum PSA, symptom problems, peak urinary flow, urinary frequency 2 hours and hesitancy. When these are compared using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for logistic regression analysis, cross-validation shows that the sensitivity of PSA alone is comparable to the five-variable model and the use of an algorithm in predicting the progression of BPH. Serum PSA levels alone are therefore an appropriate guide for treatment decisions [18].

6 M. Emberton / European Urology Supplements 2 (23) 2 7 14 PSA.2 1.3 (n = 52) PSA 1.4 3.2 (n = 65) 13.3 Change from baseline (ml) 12 1 8 6 4 2 PSA > 3.3 (n = 47) 1.6 8.7 7. 5.5 3.9 2.5 2.5 1.6 1.1 2.8 8.3 12 months 24 months 36 months 48 months Fig. 4. Serum PSA as a predictor of prostate growth in men in the placebo arm of the PLESS [15]. 5. Risk factors for AUR Data from the placebo arms of three dutasteride randomised studies resulted in about 9 episodes of AUR among the 2158 men, giving a crude incidence rate of 4.2%. The continuous variables of prostate volume, PSA and peak flow rate were divided into five equal groups and a model was created to calculate the absolute risk of AUR for an individual man based on measurable baseline characteristics [19]. The risk of AUR increased with increasing prostate volume and PSA levels and with decreasing peak flow rate. A different approach to identifying factors that predict BPH progression was taken by Dr Bob Djavan and co-workers who used a neural network model in patients with mild symptoms of BPH (IPSS 8) [2]. In order of significance, the following were predictors of BPH progression: PSA, obstructive symptom score, age, transitional zone volume, IPSS, quality of life score, peak flow rate and post void residual volume. Using this neural network, three variables were found to be particularly useful for predicting progression: obstructive symptom score, age and PSA. Age-correlated PSA plus obstructive symptom score predicted with 88% accuracy the likelihood of progression [2]. 6. The value of reducing the risk of BPH complications Data currently missing from the literature are those relating to the value patients put on a reduction in the long-term consequences of BPH. To aid appropriate management of the patient it would be useful to know the value patients would place on the 57% reduction in risk of AUR seen with 5a-reductase inhibitors. There is little research on the impact of long-term morbidity associated with BPH and on how men choose a treatment for BPH. Conjoint analysis techniques are used in market research and are increasingly used in healthcare. These techniques allow estimation of the relative Table 1 Patients marginal rates of substitution between out-of-pocket expenses or life expectancy and other attributes [21] Costs (UK ) Life expectancy (months) For a single level improvement Diarrhoea 257 1.8 Moderate to mild, or mild to absent Hot flushes 75.5 Moderate to mild, or mild to absent Loss of libido 391 1.3 Present to absent Moderate erectile dysfunction (<71 years) 537 1.8 Moderate to mild, or mild to absent Moderate erectile dysfunction (>7 years) 261.9 Moderate to mild, or mild to absent Lack of energy 889 3. Present to absent Breast symptoms 265 1.9 Present to absent

M. Emberton / European Urology Supplements 2 (23) 2 7 7 importance of different attributes of care, the trade-offs between these attributes, and the total satisfaction or utility that patients derive from such healthcare services. Table 1 shows the amounts men with prostate cancer are willing to pay, in terms or money or months/ years of life, to reduce the chance of side-effects relating to androgen suppression [21]. 7. Conclusion BPH is recognised as a progressive disorder that is associated with considerable morbidity, including the risk of AUR and the need for surgery. Due to increased life expectancy, the proportion of men at risk of BPH and its progression will increase significantly over the coming years. Effective management of the condition will be essential to reduce the economic cost and increasing the well-being of patients and their families. Consequently, the use of markers to identify those patients at greatest risk of BPH progression is necessary to ensure the timely delivery of appropriate treatment. A large body of evidence has now accumulated to demonstrate that serum PSA levels can be used to identify those patients at greatest risk of progression and, therefore, who will benefit most from treatment. Other important predictors include prostate volume, obstructive symptom score and peak flow rate. Such risk factors should be included in the standard assessment of any man presenting with LUTS. More research is needed on the value patients put on a reduction in the long-term consequences of BPH progression and thus, to what extent they are willing to trade off the speed of symptom relief for a reduction in AUR or surgery. References [1] Jacobsen SJ, Girman CJ, Guess HA, Oesterling JE, Lieber MM. New diagnostic and treatment guidelines for benign prostatic hyperplasia. Arch Intern Med 1995;155:477 81. [2] Berry SJ, Coffey DS, Walsh PC, Ewing LL. The development of human benign prostatic hyperplasia with age. J Urol 1984;132: 474 9. [3] Emberton M, Andriole GL, de la Rosette J, Djavan B, Hoefner K, Vela Navarrette R, et al. BPH: a progressive disease of the ageing male. Urology 23;61(2):267 73. [4] Jacobsen SJ, Girman CJ, Guess HA, Rhodes T, Oesterling JE, Lieber MM. Natural history of prostatism: Longitudinal changes in voiding symptoms in community dwelling men. J Urol 1996; 155:595 6. [5] Roberts RO, Jacobsen SJ, Jacobsen DJ, Rhodes T, Girman CJ, Lieber MM. Longitudinal changes in peak urinary flow rates in a community-based cohort. J Urol 2;163:17 13. [6] Rhodes T, Girman CJ, Jacobsen DJ, Roberts RO, Lieber MM, Jacobsen SJ. Longitudinal prostate volume in a community-based sample: 7 year follow up in the Olmsted County Study of urinary symptoms and health status among men. J Urol 2;163(Suppl 4): 249 [Abstract 115]. [7] McConnell JD, Bruskewitz R, Walsh P, Andriole G, Lieber M, Holtgrewe HL. The effect of finasteride on the risk of acute urinary retention and the need for surgical treatment among men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med 1998;338:557 63. [8] Jacobsen SJ, Jacobsen DJ, Girman CJ, Roberts RO, Rhodes T, Guess HA, et al. Natural history of prostatism: risk factors for acute urinary retention. J Urol 1997;158:481 7. [9] Levin RM, Hass MA, Bellamy F, Horan P, Whitbeck K, Chow PH, et al. Effect of oral Tadenan treatment on rabbit bladder structure and function after partial outlet obstruction. J Urol 22;167(5):2253 9. [1] Girman CJ, Epstein RS, Jacobsen SJ, Guess HA, Panser LA, Oesterling JE, et al. Natural history of prostatism: impact of urinary symptoms on quality of life in 2115 randomly selected community men. Urology 1994;44:825 31. [11] Garraway WM, Russell EB, Lee RJ, Collins GN, McKelvie GB, Hehir M, et al. Impact of previously unrecognised benign prostatic hyperplasia on the daily activities of middle-aged and elderly men. Br J Gen Pract 1993;43:318 21. [12] Stewart RB, Moore MT, May FE, Marks RG, Hale WE. Nocturia: a risk factor for falls in the elderly. J Am Geriatr Soc 1992;4:1217 2. [13] Sells H, Donovan J, Ewings P, MacDonagh RP. The development and validation of a quality-of-life measure to assess partner morbidity in benign prostatic enlargement. BJU Int 2;85:44 5. [14] Roehrborn CG, Boyle P, Gould AL, Waldstreicher J. Serum prostatespecific antigen as a predictor of prostate volume in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1999;53:581 9. [15] Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD, Bonilla J, Rosenblatt S, Hudson PB, Malek GH, et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen is a strong predictor of future prostate growth in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. J Urol 2;163:13 2. [16] Roehrborn CG, Boyle P, Bergner D, Gray T, Gittelman M, Shown T, et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen and prostate volume predict long-term changes in symptoms and flow rate: results of a four-year, randomized trial comparing finasteride versus placebo. Urology 1999;54:662 9. [17] Roehrborn CG, McConnell JD, Lieber M, Kaplan S, Geller J, Malek GH, et al. Serum prostate-specific antigen is a powerful predictor of acute urinary retention and need for surgery in men with clinical benign prostatic hyperplasia. Urology 1999;53:473 8. [18] Roehrborn CG, Malice M, Cook TJ, Girman CJ. Clinical predictors of spontaneous acute urinary retention in men with LUTS and clinical BPH: a comprehensive analysis of the pooled placebo groups of several large clinical trials. Urology 21;58:21 6. [19] Boyle P, Robertson C, Wilson T, D Onofrio A, Benichou J. Risk factors for acute urinary retention in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Eur Urol 23;2:26 [Abstract]. [2] Dobrovits M, Chaudry A, Anagnostou T, Bagheri F, Harik M, Marberger M, et al. A longitudinal prospective study of men with mild symptoms of BOO treated with watchful waiting over 4 years. Eur Urol Suppl 23;2(1):26 [Abstract 96]. [21] Sculpher M, Bryan S, Fry P, de Winter P, Payne H, Emberton M. Patients preferences for the management of non-metastatic prostate cancer: a discrete choice experiment. BMJ 23 (in press).