MANAGEMENT OF NITRATE AND PRUSSIC ACID IN FORAGE CROPS. Brian Shreve 1 ABSTRACT

Similar documents
Nitrate, Prussic Acid (HCN) and Grass Tetany Problems in Cattle Feeding 1

G Testing Livestock Feeds For Beef Cattle, Dairy Cattle, Sheep and Horses

U S C on, hns Jo a elin C

Fact Sheet. Feed Testing & Analysis for Beef Cattle

Animal Digestion and Nutrition. Objective 7.02: Understand the digestive process

Beef Cattle Nutrient Requirements

Principles of Silage Making

Effective Practices In Sheep Production Series

Protein in Beef Cattle Diets

INTERPRETING FORAGE QUALITY TEST REPORTS

Beef Cattle Nutrient Requirements

Potash, Magnesium & Sodium

Stockpiling and strategic supplementation

Sheep Feeding Programs: Forage and Feed Analysis

Assessing Your J Grennan & Sons Silage Report.

There are six general classes of nutrients needed in the horse s diet: water carbohydrates fats protein minerals vitamins.

Why Graze? Supplementing Lactating Cows Requires Different Thinking. Grazing when grazing wasn t cool!! WHY? Good Pasture WVU Circular 379 Early 50s

Nutrition #3 Created for Canadian Pony Club Education By Lezah Williamson

SMALL GRAIN CEREAL FORAGES: TIPS FOR EVALUATING VARIETIES AND TEST RESULTS. George Fohner 1 ABSTRACT

Animal Science 144 Beef Cattle & Sheep Production R. D. Sainz Lecture 03. Definitions

Definitions. Animal Science 144 Beef Cattle & Sheep Production R. D. Sainz Lecture 03

CPT David J. Licciardello, DVM Veterinary Advisor

Veterinary Science Preparatory Training for the Veterinary Assistant. Floron C. Faries, Jr., DVM, MS

Maximizing Forage Quality

Understanding Forage Intake in Range Animals

PASTURE BASED NUTRITION FOR HORSES

As Sampled Basis nutrient results for the sample in its natural state including the water. Also known as as fed or as received.

Alkaloid Prussic Acid -

Intro to Meat Goat Nutrition

MANAGING THE DAIRY COW DURING THE DRY PERIOD

Matching Hay to the Cow s Requirement Based on Forage Test

Limitations to Plant Analysis. John Peters & Carrie Laboski Department of Soil Science University of Wisconsin-Madison

4-H Premier Exhibitor

ESTIMATING THE ENERGY VALUE OF CORN SILAGE AND OTHER FORAGES. P.H. Robinson 1 ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION

Guidelines for Feeding Broiler Litter to Beef Cattle

WSVMA Annual Conference

COW SUPPLEMENTATION: GETTING THE BEST BANG FOR YOUR BUCK. Low Quality Forage. Ruminant Digestive Anatomy. How do we get the best bang for the buck?

Developing a mineral program: combining the art and the science. Mary Drewnoski, Beef Systems Specialist, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Introduction to MUN. What is Urea

Soil Prescription - Sample 1

Alberta 4-H Bison Project Member Level One. Feeds for Bison

HarvestLab John Deere Constituent Sensing

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS

Mega Min. Maximise the potential of your livestock. Solutions. AUSTRALIA

Grass Tetany in Cattle An Examination of its Causes, Clinical Signs and Cures

Making Forage Analysis Work for You in Balancing Livestock Rations and Marketing Hay

By: Dr. Patrick Davis, University of Missouri Extension County Livestock Specialist Jeff Yearington, Lincoln University Farm Outreach Worker West

Beef Cattle Handbook

Production Costs. Learning Objectives. Essential Nutrients. The Marvels of Ruminant Digestion

Terry Richmond s Fertilizer Package mentioned in the panel discussion March 14, 2013.

EFFECT OF LEVEL OF SURFACE SPOILAGE ON THE NUTRITIVE VALUE OF MAIZE SILAGE DIETS. K. K. Bolsen, L. A. Whitlock, G. L. Huck, M. K.

Defining Forage Quality 1

DAIRY FOCUS AT ILLINOIS NEWSLETTER. Focus on Forages Volume 2, Number 1

Right Quality vs High Quality Forages

Nitrophoska. Cereals, fodder beet, horticulture, maize and vegetables. Precise nutrition for superior plant performance

Digestion of the Bison

Feed ID Options /10/2016. DM% CP% TDN% Fat% Ca% P%

NUTRITION. Understanding Nutrients and Their Importance

Efficient Use of Forages and Impact on Cost of Production

Animal Digestion and Nutrition

Milk Urea Nitrogen Evaluation in Louisiana Dairy Herds

Feeding Your Miniature Horse

Rumination or cud chewing consists of regurgitation, remastication, reinsalvation, and reswallowing.

Evaluation of manure can provide information on rumen function and digestion of the ration. By understanding the factors that cause changes in

Protein and Carbohydrate Utilization by Lactating Dairy Cows 1

Nitrate and Nitrite Key Words: 1. Introduction 1.1. Nature, Mechanism of Action, and Biological Effects (Fig. 1)

PRODUCTION OSTRICH NUTRITION FEEDING RATES AND FEEDING MANAGEMENT

Nutrition Building the Foundation

FEEDING VALUE OF WET DISTILLERS GRAINS FOR LACTATING DAIRY COWS WHEN CO-ENSILED WITH CORN SILAGE OR HAYCROP SILAGE

ABSTRACT FORAGE SAMPLING AND TESTING ACCURACY CHOOSING A FORAGE TESTING LAB

How Do I Supplement My Livestock With Minerals? Part IV

Unit 2: Animals on the land

Fibre is complicated! NDFD, undfom in forage analysis reports NDF. Review. NDF is meant to measure Hemicellulose Celluose Lignin

2009 Forage Production and Quality Report for Pennsylvania

Feed Management to Improve Nitrogen and Phosphorus Efficiency. Charles C. Stallings Professor and Extension Dairy Scientist Virginia Tech

INFLUENCE OF LOOSE LICK SUPPLEMENT ON THE GROWTH RATE OF LAMBS GRAZING STUBBLES

mycotoxin-contaminated contaminated food or feed

IMPACT OF TRACE MINERAL VARIATION WITHIN FORAGES ON THE RATION FORMULATION PROCESS. J. R. Knapp Fox Hollow Consulting, LLC Columbus, Ohio INTRODUCTION

Established Facts. Impact of Post Harvest Forage on the Rumen Function. Known Facts. Known Facts

CHAMPION TOC INDEX. Protein Requirements of Feedlot Cattle. E. K. Okine, G. W. Mathison and R. R. Corbett. Take Home Message

28. Ketosis and Urea Poisoning

Forage Quality and Livestock Nutrition on Pasture. Patrick Davis, Ph. D. Johnson County MU Extension Livestock Specialist

RECENT ADVANCES IN ALFALFA TISSUE TESTING. Steve Orloff, Dan Putnam and Rob Wilson 1 INTRODUCTION

Pure rumen conditioning with bio-available minerals

ENSILING OF SUGAR CANE WITH AMMONIA MOLASSES AND MINERAL ACIDS. T R Preston, C Hinojosa & L Martinez

Nutritional requirements

Lamb Weaning and Nutrition

FEEDING SHEEP FOR PROF$T

Feeding Strategies When Alfalfa Supplies are Short

Response of Ruminants to Protein Supplementation is Affected by Type of Low-quality Forage 1

High Plains Biofuels Co-product Nutrition Conference. What Have We Learned?

Understanding Dairy Nutrition Terminology

The four stomachs of a dairy cow

Feeding Methods. Assist.Prof.Dr. Dhia Al-Khayat

Chapter 1: Overview of soil fertility, plant nutrition, and nutrient management

The difficult financial times combined with the

BIOLOGY AND EFFECTS OF SPONTANEOUS HEATING IN HAY. Wayne K. Coblentz, John A. Jennings, and Kenneth P. Coffey 1 ABSTRACT

Hay Testing and Understanding Forage Quality

Optimizing Nutrient Management and Delivery. Dr. Karl Hoppe Area Extension Livestock Specialist NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

The Rumen Inside & Out

Transcription:

MANAGEMENT OF NITRATE AND PRUSSIC ACID IN FORAGE CROPS Brian Shreve 1 ABSTRACT The two factors of drought conditions and export markets are focusing recent attention on nitrates and prussic acid in forages. During normal years, nitrate-nitrogen (NO 3 -N) taken up by crops is quickly converted into protein. When forages grow under drought stress, however, they tend to accumulate nitrate. Alternative forages such as sorghums and sudans tend to accumulate even higher levels, with the added problem of potentially toxic prussic acid levels. Nitratenitrogen in excess of 1400 ppm is considered to be potentially toxic to ruminants. Surveying samples submitted to Servi-Tech Laboratories this past summer shows a range of <100 ppm to >19,000 ppm NO 3 -N, with an average of 2200 ppm. Accurate determination of nitrate levels is critical to management of high-nitrate forages. Prussic acid poisoning can occur when animals are fed sorghum or its close relatives. Stress such as drought or frost leads these plants to produce higher levels of dhurrin, a compound containing hydrogen cyanide (HCN). Cyanide is toxic when levels exceed 300-500 ppm HCN on a dry basis. Factors contributing to high nitrate and prussic acid levels are discussed. Recommendations are presented to provide management guidelines to utilizers of these forages. Key Words: nitrate, prussic acid, alternative forages, management, forage quality, drought stress, HCN, dhurrin INTRODUCTION Much of the western U.S. was haunted by drought again this year, focusing much attention on climatic conditions. Coupled with that, the west and central high plains faced a cool spring, further limiting growth of forages. Although moisture in the last month or so has helped restore depleted soil moisture, it arrived too late to be of much help for this year s crops. Nitrate toxicity. Plants take up nitrogen in the form of nitrate (NO 3 - ), which is then converted to protein. When plant metabolism is slowed by stressors such as drought, cool temperatures, hail, or other physiological stress, then nitrate accumulates in plant tissues. This occurs due to luxury uptake of soil nitrate coupled with decreased conversion of NO 3 - to protein. This causes no harm to the plant itself, and in fact occurs to some degree in every agronomic crop even in normal years. Problems only occur when forages are consumed by livestock. Upon ingestion by ruminants, plant NO 3 - is reduced to nitrite (NO 2 - ) and eventually to ammonium (NH 4 + ) by rumen microbes. The ammonium is then converted into microbial protein. When nitrate is present in excess amounts, a surplus of nitrite is produced. This nitrite is absorbed into the bloodstream and complexes with blood hemoglobin, forming methemoglobin. Red blood cells containing methemoglobin no longer carry oxygen in the 1 B. Shreve, Laboratory Manager, Servi-Tech Laboratories, PO Box 169, Hastings, NE 68902; Email: brians@servitechinc.com. In: Proceedings, Western Alfalfa and Forage Conference, 11-13 December, 2002, Sparks, NV, UC Cooperative Extension, University of California, Davis 95616. (See http://alfalfa.ucdavis.edu).

blood, thus the animal may die from asphyxiation at the cellular level. Therefore, nitrite toxicity is actually the problem, but it results from excess nitrate in forages and is commonly referred to as nitrate toxicity. Nitrate toxicity may manifest in hours or it may take days to appear. Nonspecific signs of nitrate toxicity include weight loss, reduced appetite, diarrhea, and runny eyes. Abortion may occur at lower nitrate levels with no other symptoms. Acute toxicity symptoms include labored breathing, muscle tremors, cyanosis, and collapse with coma and death following within two to three hours. Nitrate toxicity may be confirmed postmortem by chocolate-brown blood within the first few hours after death (blood reverts back to its normal color after that). Veterinary diagnosis and treatment of nitrate toxicity is generally recommended, with emergency infusion of methylene blue as an antidote indicated in acute nitrate toxicity. So what are safe levels of nitrate-nitrogen in forages? Surveying the literature shows a wide range of safe levels and also shows numerous reporting units, with ppm NO 3 -, ppm KNO 3, ppm NO3-N, and %NO3 - being most common. (The author has previously recommended all labs standardize on ppm NO3-N as a reporting unit to lessen the confusion associated with numerous reporting units). Examples can be found in the scientific literature of death occurring at fairly low levels of dietary nitrate. Conversely, examples can be found where animals are fed rations containing high levels of nitrate with no harm. The reason is that factors other than feed nitrate content affect toxicity. These factors include animal stress, amount of forage consumed, how quickly an animal eats, plant part(s) consumed, adaptation by animals, amount of grain fed, and water nitrate concentration. Values considered safe in the literature range from 1000 to 3000 ppm NO3-N. At Servi-Tech Laboratories, we recommend keeping diets under 1400 ppm NO3-N for ruminants. Horses are much less susceptible, and can tolerate somewhat higher levels. Since some anaerobic fermentation occurs in the cecum, however, nitrate toxicity is still a concern. Forages vary widely in NO3-N concentration, even on the same farm. A survey of forage samples sent in to the Hastings, NE, location of Servi-Tech Laboratories in 2002 shows an average concentration of 2200 ppm NO3-N, and a range of <100 ppm (our reporting limit) to in excess of 19,000 ppm NO3-N. Thus, forage suspected of having high nitrate should be tested by a reputable laboratory prior to feeding. Prussic Acid Poisoning. In addition to accumulating nitrate, alternative forages may also have toxic concentrations of prussic acid. This is especially true in sorghum, sudans, and closely related species. Prussic acid (also known as hydrocyanic acid or hydrogen cyanide, HCN) poisoning is caused by cyanide production in these plants under certain growing conditions. The cyanogenic molecule in these plants is dhurrin, which occurs in epidermal (surface) cells, and this molecule is nontoxic in healthy, intact cells. Mesophyll cells located directly beneath the epidermis, however, contain an enzyme that releases HCN from dhurrin. If leaves are damaged, the dhurrin and enzyme intermix, releasing cyanide. Similar to nitrate, cyanide interacts with blood hemoglobin after ingestion and interferes with oxygen transport. Prussic acid is a fast-acting poison, usually killing the animal within minutes. Signs and symptons of prussic acid poisoning are nonspecific and are similar to nitrate toxicity: excess salivation, difficult breathing, staggering, and collapse with death from respiratory

paralysis occurring soon after. The main difference is that animals with prussic acid poisoning have bright red blood that is slow to clot, whereas animals with nitrate toxicity have dark, chocolate-brown blood. A bitter almond smell is often detected in animals suffering from cyanide poisoning. Symptoms are usually observed too late for treatment, due to the fast-acting nature of cyanide. If there is no doubt about diagnosis, simultaneous injections of sodium nitrate and sodium thiosulfate may be administered for treatment. The sodium nitrate releases the cyanide molecules from cells, which are then complexed by the sodium thiosulfate and excreted. Treatment and survival is usually limited to a narrow window of a few hours after poisoning. As with nitrate, ruminants tend to be more susceptible to prussic acid poisoning. This is because cud chewing and microbial fermentation both contribute to release of cyanide. Monogastric animals, on the other hand, tend to be much less susceptible, as the enzyme responsible for hydrolyzing dhurrin is destroyed in stomach acid. Again, the literature varies quite a bit in what are considered safe levels, but a range of 300 500 ppm HCN on a dry-matter basis is generally considered safe. Unlike nitrate, animals cannot adapt to higher HCN levels. Again, a representative sample of forages suspected of having potentially high levels of prussic acid should be submitted to a reputable laboratory for analysis. FACTORS AFFECTING NITRATE AND HCN LEVELS Management of high nitrate and/or HCN levels begins with understanding the factors affecting these levels. One factor that affects both nitrate and HCN is soil fertility. Research has shown that plants grown in soils deficient in P or K and with ample N tend to accumulate nitrate, and if in the sorghum family, tend to also accumulate HCN. Overapplication of N can lead to imbalances as well. Applying high amounts of N fertilizer or manure late in the season increases concentrations as well. Split nitrogen applications reduce the potential for toxicity, provide better nutrient distribution, and may be more economical as well. Stress is another factor common to both nitrate and HCN toxicities. Of plant stressors, drought is usually the biggest culprit. Roots continually take up nitrate, but high daytime temperatures inhibit protein synthesis. After a drought-ending rain, up to 14 days may be required for metabolism of the accumulated nitrates. Similarly, drought-stunted plants may accumulate HCN. New growth following a drought-ending rain becomes dangerously high in HCN, and is highly palatable. Frost, hail, disease, and other stressors also influence accumulation of both nitrate and HCN. A killing frost will cause release of HCN, rendering plants safe to graze after a period of at least four days providing there is no regrowth. Such a frost has no net affect on nitrate levels, however. Animal stress can increase susceptibility to nitrate and prussic acid toxicity. Hunger is also a contributing factor, due to the effect that forage quantity consumed and meal length have on toxicity. Harvest method also affects HCN and nitrate levels. Here is where some of the misperceptions often arise. Animal grazing is usually the least desirable, as it is difficult to control intake and prussic acid levels are highest in fresh forage. Haying doesn t change nitrate concentrations at all, but typically renders all but the highest HCN-containing forages safe. This is because HCN

is volatile and dissipates during curing. Ensiling forages high in HCN also reduces HCN substantially, and can reduce nitrate 30-60%. RECOMMENDATIONS Sampling. Sample forages harvested for hay according to current National Forage Testing Association (NFTA) guidelines, found at http://www.foragetesting.org, and submit promptly to the laboratory in a sealed plastic bag. Ideally, samples for HCN analysis should reach the lab on ice and within 6 hours of sampling. Of course, haying typically results in almost complete dissipation of HCN, and analysis of HCN in dry hays is not generally recommended. When sampling green chop or silage, collect samples at six locations from the active feeding face of the pit or mound. Mix the sample thoroughly and reduce size by coning and quartering. Place sample in plastic bag and send to the laboratory for analysis. Getting a representative sample from standing forage is difficult. Cattle and other grazers tend to be selective in which plants and plant parts they graze. Clipped samples taken at a typical grazing height for the animal species of concern typically will slightly overestimate nitrate intake and underestimate HCN intake due to their distribution in plants. However, this sample does give a general idea of the potential for problems and should be taken prior to grazing any field suspected of having toxic levels of either nitrate or prussic acid. Harvest technique. Nitrate tends to accumulate in lower stalks, so increase harvest height to decrease nitrate concentration in the harvested forage. Consider ensiling where the forage can be utilized locally, as this will reduce nitrates by roughly half. When harvesting by grazing, manage stocking rate to avoid heavy grazing. Avoid turning out animals onto high nitrate forages or forages containing elevated HCN levels without prior feeding. Remove animals from susceptible forages for 10-14 days following a drought-ending rain. Adapt animals gradually to high nitrate feeds, and avoid feeding potentially toxic feeds to stressed livestock. Dilution. High nitrate forages and forages with high HCN levels may be safely fed if diluted to safe levels. Dilute out high nitrate or prussic acid forages with low nitrate/hcn forage, byproducts, or supplemental grain in a balanced ration. Grain supplementation can be highly effective in managing higher nitrate feeds as the carbohydrates benefit rumen microbes and enhance reduction of nitrite to ammonium. Stress. Minimize animal and plant stress as much as possible. Provide adequate quantities of clean, low nitrate drinking water. REFERENCES Ball, D.M., C.S. Hoveland, and G.D. Lacefield. 1996. Southern Forages, 2 nd Ed. Potash and Phosphate Institute, Norcross, GA.

Fjell, D., D. Blasi and G. Towne. 1991. Nitrate and Prussic Acid Toxicity in Forage: Causes, prevention, and feeding management. MF-1018, Coop. Ext. Service, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS. Kansas Forage Task Force, 1998. Forage Facts Notebook, Kansas State Univ., Manhattan, KS. Mayland, H.F. and S.R. Wilkinson, 1996. Mineral Nutrition, pp. 165-191 In: Moser, L.E. et al.(eds.), Cool Season Forage Grasses. Agron. No. 34, ASA-CSSA-SSSA, Madison, WI. Rasby, R., R. Stock, B. Anderson and N. Schneider, 1988. Nitrates in Livestock Feeding. NebGuide G74-170-A. Coop. Ext, Inst. of Agric. and Nat. Resources, Univ. of NE, Lincoln. Shreve, B.R. and R.O. Miller. 2002. Methods of Analysis for Nitrate in Forages. In: NFTA Annual Meeting Proceedings, National Forage Testing Association, Omaha, NE (in press).