Characterization of Malignancy of Adnexal Lesions Using ADC Entropy: Comparison With Mean ADC and Qualitative DWI Assessment

Similar documents
Can diffusion weighted imaging distinguish between benign and malignant solid or predominantly solid gynecological adnexal masses?

بسم هللا الرحمن الرحيم. Prof soha Talaat

Whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient measurements in nephroblastoma: Can it identify blastemal predominance? Abstract Purpose To explore the

Effect of intravenous contrast medium administration on prostate diffusion-weighted imaging

Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer

Essentials of Clinical MR, 2 nd edition. 73. Urinary Bladder and Male Pelvis

MRI IN THE CHARACTERIZATION OF SEMINOMATOUS AND NONSEMINOMATOUS GERM CELL TUMORS OF THE TESTIS

JMSCR Vol 05 Issue 06 Page June 2017

MR Differentiation of Endometriomas Complicated with and without Malignancy: Comparison with Pathological Findings

Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging with conventional MR imaging for differentiating complex solid and cystic ovarian tumors at 1.

Malignant Transformation of Endometriosis: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Aspects

Malignant Transformation of Endometriosis: Magnetic Resonance Imaging Aspects

Value of Lipid- and Water- Suppression MR Images in Distinguishing Between Blood and Lipid Within Ovarian Masses

ADRENAL MR: PEARLS AND PITFALLS

Evaluation of Primary Adnexal Masses by 3T MRI: Categorization with Conventional MR Imaging and Diffusionweighted

MRI features of primary and metastatic mucinous ovarian tumors

Role of MRI Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Quantification in the Differentiation between Benign and Malignant Mediastinal and Pulmonary Lesions

Researcher 2018;10(8)

The role of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and relative ADC in the evaluation of breast masses

Evaluation of primary adnexal masses by 3T MRI: categorization with conventional MR imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging

Imaging evaluation of ovarian masses.

Preoperative prediction of the malignancy or benignancy of

MR cholangiopancreatography; Predicting imaging findings for differentiation of malignant bile ductal obstruction versus benign lesion

Adnexal Masses and Problem Solving Pelvic MRI

Value of MRI in Characterizing Adnexal Masses

Abdominal applications of DWI

Case Fibrothecoma of the ovary

Characterizing Adnexal Masses: Pearls and Pitfalls 20 th Annual Summer Practicum SCBT-MR Jackson Hole August 11, 2010

RESEARCH ARTICLE. Abstract. Introduction

MR Imaging of the Adnexal Masses: A Review

The shading sign: is it exclusive of endometriomas?

Successful Breast MRI Program : The ingredients

The estimated annual incidence of central nervous system

Diffusion Weighted Imaging in Prostate Cancer

Magnetic Resonance Imaging in sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses

MRI Features of Ovarian Fibroma and Fibrothecoma With Histopathologic Correlation

The follow-up of uterine fibroids treated with HIFU: role of DWI and Dynamic contrast-study MRI

Prostate Cancer: Comparison of Tumor Visibility on Trace Diffusion- Weighted Images and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient Map

Anatomical and Functional MRI of the Pancreas

A Practical Approach to Adnexal Masses

The Egyptian Journal of Hospital Medicine (April 2018) Vol. 71 (2), Page

Altought liver (75%) and lung (15%) are the most commonly involved

MR diagnostics of adnexal masses

Characterization of Adrenal Lesions at Chemical-Shift MRI: A Direct Intraindividual Comparison of In- and Opposed- Phase Imaging at 1.


Role of MRI Diffusion in Assessment of Mediastinal Lymphadenopathy

Utility of ADC Measurements in the Discrimination between Benign and Lymphomatous Abdomino-Pelvic Lymph Nodes

RECENT ADVANCES IN CLINICAL MR OF ARTICULAR CARTILAGE

Case 1. Gynaecology Case Presentation. Objectives. Disclosures 22/10/ year old female Clinical history: Assess right ovarian cyst

Diffusion-weighted MR imaging for Diagnosis of Uterine Leiomyomas

Recently, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) has been identified as a

NEW SUBTRACTION ALGORITHMS FOR EVALUATION OF BREAST LESIONS ON DYNAMIC CONTRAST ENHANCED MR MAMMOGRAPHY

Clinical Correlation of a New Practical MRI Method for Assessing Cervical Spinal Canal Compression

Emergency Abdominal MRI Protocols

Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Sonographically Indeterminate Adnexal Masses: A Reliable Diagnostic Tool to Detect Benign and Malignant Lesion

2D and 3D MR imaging in the assessment of Fallopian tube features

MR imaging of FIGO stage I uterine cervical cancer: The diagnostic impact of 3T-MRI

Nodular thyroid is commonly detected on palpation in

Factors that Differentiate between Endometriosis-associated Ovarian Cancer and Benign Ovarian Endometriosis with Mural Nodules

11/10/2015. Prostate cancer in the U.S. Multi-parametric MRI of Prostate Diagnosis and Treatment Planning. NIH estimates for 2015.

Disclosure. Acknowledgement. What is the Best Workup for Rectal Cancer Staging: US/MRI/PET? Rectal cancer imaging. None

The diagnosis and localization of prostate cancer are based on a digital

Diffusion weighted MRI in evaluation of transplanted kidney: Preliminary clinical experience

Clinical application of 3.0 T proton MR spectroscopy in evaluation of pancreatic diseases

Pelvic Applications of Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Images

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Evaluation of Prostate Cancer: Optimal B Value at 3T

Primary Carcinoid Tumor of the Ovary: MR Imaging Characteristics with Pathologic Correlation

The Role of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and the Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Values for Breast Tumors

Role of Conventional and Diffusion Weighted MRI in the Evaluation of Pediatric Musculoskeletal Tumors

Comparison of magnetic resonance diffusionweighted imaging characteristics between cystic lesions and normal pancreatic parenchyma

Essentials of Clinical MR, 2 nd edition. 65. Benign Hepatic Masses

Characterization of Soft Tissue Tumors by Diffusion-Weighted Imaging

Diffusion-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Imaging Detects Local Recurrence After Radical Prostatectomy: Initial Experience

Comparison of 1.5 T Tesla and 3.0 T Tesla Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Evaluating Local Extension of Endometrial Cancer

The Usefulness of Diffusion-weighted Imaging in Observing Localized Extension of Endometrial Cancer

Contrast-enhanced Breast MRI RSSA 2013

Endometrioma With Calcification Simulating a Dermoid on Sonography

Deep infiltrating endometriosis MR imaging with surgical correlation

Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma

Imaging can play an important role in determining benignancy

Table 9: Vascularity and Hemorrhage

Magnetic resonance imaging for distinguishing ovarian clear cell carcinoma from high-grade serous carcinoma

Pharmacokinetic evaluation of DCIS

Magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) is

Endometriosis - MRI findings with anatomic-pathologic correlation

CT and conventional MR imaging (using spin-echo [SE]

PI-RADS classification: prognostic value for prostate cancer grading

Visualization strategies for major white matter tracts identified by diffusion tensor imaging for intraoperative use

Case Report. Case Report

REVIEW. Distinguishing benign from malignant adrenal masses

ABDOMINAL DIFFUSION WEIGHTED MR

dgemric Effectively Predicts Cartilage Damage Associated with Femoroacetabular Impingement

MRI Abdomen Protocol Pancreas/MRCP with Contrast

Apparent diffusion coefficient of vertebral haemangiomas allows differentiation from malignant focal deposits in whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI

High b Value Diffusion-Weighted MRI for Detecting Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma: Preliminary Results

Armed Forces Institute of Pathology.

Computed Diffusion-Weighted Image in the Abdomen

Intrahepatic Sarcomatoid Cholangiocarcinoma with Portal Vein Thrombosis: A Case Report 1

Diffusion-weighted MRI of metastatic liver lesions: is there a difference between hypervascular and hypovascular metastases?

Transcription:

CME JOURNAL OF MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING 37:164 171 (2013) Original Research Characterization of Malignancy of Adnexal Lesions Using ADC Entropy: Comparison With Mean ADC and Qualitative DWI Assessment Andrea S. Kierans, MD, 1 Genevieve L. Bennett, MD, 1 Thais C. Mussi, MD, 1 James S. Babb, PhD, 1 Henry Rusinek, PhD, 1 Jonathan Melamed, MD, 2 and Andrew B. Rosenkrantz, MD 1 * 1 Department of Radiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. 2 Department of Pathology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York, USA. *Current address for T.C. Mussi: Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, Albert Einstein Ave., 627, Sao Paulo-SP, Brazil. *Address reprint requests to: A.B.R., Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, 560 First Ave., TCH-HW202, New York, NY 10016. E-mail: Andrew.Rosenkrantz@nyumc.org Received February 6, 2012; Accepted July 31, 2012. DOI 10.1002/jmri.23794 View this article online at wileyonlinelibrary.com. Purpose: To establish the utility of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) entropy in discrimination of benign and malignant adnexal lesions, using histopathology as the reference standard, via comparison of the diagnostic performance of ADC entropy with mean ADC and with visual assessments of adnexal lesions on conventional and diffusion-weighted sequences. Materials and Methods: In all, 37 adult female patients with an ovarian mass that was resected between June 2006 and January 2011 were included. Volume-of-interest was drawn to incorporate all lesion voxels on every slice that included the mass on the ADC map, from which whole-lesion mean ADC and ADC entropy were calculated. Two independent radiologists also rated each lesion as benign or malignant based on visual assessment of all sequences. The Mann Whitney test and logistic regression for correlated data were used to compare performance of mean ADC, ADC entropy, and the visual assessments. Results: No statistically significant difference was observed in mean ADC between benign and malignant adnexal lesions (P ¼ 0.768). ADC entropy was significantly higher in malignant than in benign lesions (P ¼ 0.009). Accuracy was significantly greater for ADC entropy than for mean ADC (0.018). ADC entropy and visual assessment by the less-experienced reader showed similar accuracy (P 0.204). The more experienced reader s accuracy was significantly greater than that of all other assessments (P 0.039). Conclusion: ADC entropy showed significantly greater accuracy than the more traditional metric of mean ADC for distinguishing benign and malignant adnexal lesions. Although whole-lesion ADC entropy provides a straightforward and objective measurement, its potential benefit decreases with greater reader experience. Key Words: ovary; diffusion-weighted imaging; apparent diffusion coefficient; entropy; MRI J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;37:164 171. VC 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. THE ACCURATE CHARACTERIZATION of an adnexal mass as benign or malignant is crucial to avoid unnecessary surgery. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is an important clinical tool in making this determination (1,2). A spectrum of morphologic and signal intensity features of adnexal lesions using conventional MR sequences can be used to favor benignity or malignancy in a given case. However, the imaging findings are frequently nonspecific, and accurate characterization can remain difficult. Previous studies have demonstrated that qualitative assessment of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) can contribute to the characterization of adnexal lesions (3 6). DWI can also be evaluated in a quantitative fashion, which most typically is achieved by computing apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values. ADC measures the rate of random motion of water molecules and has been shown to be decreased by increased tumor cellularity (7,8). However, prior investigations of the role of ADC values in differentiating benign and malignant adnexal lesions have yielded controversial results (5,6,9). For instance, endometriomas and teratomas, both common benign adnexal lesions, exhibit decreased ADC values that mimic the decreased ADC of neoplasms (6,9). Entropy is a texture-based statistical measure of the variation in the histogram distribution of a given metric and represents the predictability of the intensity of the metric within the tissue. High entropy images contain a large number of voxels with different values, each of which are more or less equally prevalent. A disease process that affects a tissue heterogeneously is expected to result in less predictable intensity characteristics within the tissue and thus higher entropy (10). ADC entropy has been shown to VC 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. 164

ADC Entropy of Adnexal Lesions 165 be of value in the characterization of liver fibrosis and multiple sclerosis (11,12). The purpose of this study was to establish the utility of ADC entropy in the discrimination of benign and malignant adnexal lesions, using histopathology as the reference standard. Diagnostic performance of ADC entropy was compared with mean ADC and with visual assessments of adnexal lesions on conventional and DWI MR sequences. MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients This retrospective study was compliant with the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act and approved by our Institutional Review Board, with waiver of the requirement for written informed consent. One author (ASK, 2nd-year radiology resident), who served as the data coordinator for the study, searched institutional databases to identify adult women with an adnexal mass that was resected between June 2006 and January 2011 and who had undergone preoperative pelvic MRI that included DWI. Lesions were excluded for the following reasons: severe artifact on DWI (n ¼ 1); MRI performed at 3T (n ¼ 3); and delay of greater than 180 days between MRI and surgical resection (n ¼ 1). This yielded a final study cohort of 37 patients (mean age 54 6 14 years, range 27 91 years). Histopathologic analysis of the 37 resected adnexal lesions established nine as malignant and 28 as benign. The mean time interval between MRI and surgery was 35 6 29 days (range 6 137 days). The diagnoses for the nine malignant lesions were as follows: epithelial ovarian carcinoma (n ¼ 7); borderline epithelial neoplasm (n ¼ 1); carcinosarcoma (n ¼ 1). The diagnoses for the 28 benign lesions were as follows: endometrioma (n ¼ 9); teratoma (n ¼ 2); cystadenofibroma (n ¼ 3); Brenner tumor (n ¼ 1); other benign epithelial neoplasm (n ¼ 3); benign sex-cord stromal tumor (n ¼ 5); nonneoplastic cyst (n ¼ 4); benign hyperplastic lesion (n ¼ 1). In one patient with bilateral endometriomas and one patient with bilateral teratomas, the larger lesion was selected for analysis. MRI Technique All patients underwent pelvic MRI on one of three 1.5-T clinical systems (Avanto [n ¼ 20], Symphony [n ¼ 11], or Sonata [n ¼ 6], Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) using a torso phased-array coil (six-element anterior and posterior coil arrays for the Avanto scanner and four-element anterior and posterior coil arrays for the Sonata and Symphony scanners). Conventional MRI sequences performed in all patients included multiplanar turbo-spin echo T2- weighted imaging (T2WI), axial in-and-opposed-phase gradient-echo T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), and dynamic 3D fat-suppressed gradient-echo T1WI performed before and following intravenous administration of gadolinium-chelate. One patient was pregnant at the time of MRI and did not receive intravenous contrast. All examinations included a fat-suppressed single-shot echo-planar DWI axial or sagittal sequence of the pelvis that used tridirectional motion-probing gradients, and included b-values of 0 and 500 s/mm 2. Although acquisition parameters of the DWI sequence varied slightly based on scanner, imaging plane, and patient size, representative parameters were as follows: TR/TE 2100 2500/76-82 msec; slice thickness 6 8 mm; field-of-view 350 mm with 75% 80% rectangular field-of-view; matrix 144 192; 3 signal averages; receiver bandwidth 1300 Hz/voxel. The data coordinator constructed ADC maps on a pixel-wise basis for each case on a commercial workstation (Leonardo, Siemens Healthcare) using the b-values of 0 and 500 s/mm 2 and a monoexponential fit. Quantitative Analysis A single radiologist (ABR, with 3 years experience in body MRI) who was unaware of histologic findings used in-house developed software (FireVoxel; https:// files.nyu.edu/hr18/public/projects.html) to perform a quantitative analysis of the ADC maps generated by the data coordinator. This software allowed placement of 3D volumes of interest (VOI) encompassing multiple slices. For each lesion a VOI was drawn on every slice that included the mass on the ADC map. The VOI was placed just inside the outer margin of the lesion on each slice to minimize partial volume error. The mean ADC and ADC entropy were calculated for the entire VOI. Entropy was computed as S( p i )/log(p i ), in which p i represents the frequency of ADC values in the VOI (ie, the number of corresponding voxels normalized to the total number of lesion voxels) (11,12). At the time of entropy calculation, the lesion histogram was constructed for ADC values expressed in units of 10 5 mm 2 /s. In addition, for each lesion the bin width of the histogram was fixed at 10 5 mm 2 /s. Qualitative Analysis Qualitative analyses were performed independently by two radiologists fellowship-trained in abdominal imaging and with experience in evaluation of DWI (TCM with 2 years experience [R1], and GLB with 15 years experience that included dedicated experience in women s imaging [R2]) who were both unaware of histologic findings. Cases were reviewed in different orders during two sessions, separated by at least 3 weeks. The readers knew that all lesions had undergone surgical resection but were unaware of other clinical or pathologic details. During session 1 (S1), conventional MRI sequences alone were reviewed. During session 2 (S2), conventional sequences were reviewed in combination with DWI, including acquired images obtained using b-values of 0 and 500 s/mm 2 as well as the ADC map. The readers characterized each adnexal lesion based on a qualitative visual assessment using the following 5-point scale: 1 ¼ definitely benign, 2 ¼ probably benign, 3 ¼ indeterminate, 4 ¼ probably malignant, 5 ¼ definitely malignant. When reviewing DWI, increased signal on the high b-value image with corresponding low ADC

166 Kierans et al. Table 1 Mean ADC and ADC Entropy Among Different Groups of Adnexal Lesions Study group n Mean ADC* ADC entropy All benign lesions 30 1.90 6 0.93 4.54 6 0.44 Endometriomas and 11 1.68 6 0.85 4.47 6 0.53 teratomas Other benign lesions 19 2.04 6 0.97 4.58 6 0.39 All malignant lesions 9 2.00 6 0.53 4.94 6 0.40 *10 3 mm 2 /s. (restricted diffusion) was considered suggestive of malignancy. However, the readers were not required to characterize a lesion showing restricted diffusion as malignant if the lesion showed other features highly specific for a benign diagnosis. The readers also recorded if the lesion demonstrated MRI features indicative of an endometrioma (a nonenhancing T1-hyperintense lesion exhibiting shading on T2-weighted images (13) or teratoma (a lesion demonstrating microscopic or macroscopic lipid (14). Statistical Analysis Mean ADC and ADC entropy of benign and malignant adnexal lesions were compared using an exact Mann Whitney test. Logistic regression for correlated data was used to compare the performance of mean ADC, ADC entropy, and the subjective interpretations of the two radiologists during each session for distinguishing benign and malignant adnexal lesions. Specifically, generalized estimating equations based on a binary logistic regression model was used to model the likelihood of a correct diagnosis relative to pathology as a function of the diagnostic test used for the evaluation. The results from all six tests (mean ADC; ADC entropy; and the subjective interpretations of both readers, with and without DWI) were combined within an overall analysis. The correlation structure resulting from the inclusion of multiple test results per subject was modeled by assuming results to be correlated only when acquired from the same subject. Receiver-operatingcharacteristic curve analysis was used to identify threshold values in terms of mean ADC and ADC entropy that achieved greatest accuracy in performing the previous analyses. When evaluating the qualitative reader assessments, scores of 4 and 5 were considered positive for malignancy. Because endometriomas and teratomas can exhibit highly specific imaging features on conventional MRI alone (2,6), statistical analyses were performed both with and without the inclusion of these lesions. P values are reported as two-sided Wald significance levels and considered statistically significant at P < 0.05. SAS 9.0 (SAS Institute, Cary, NC) was used for all computations. RESULTS Quantitative Analysis Table 1 summarizes the mean ADC and ADfC entropy within the study cohort. The slightly lower mean ADC among endometriomas and teratomas compared with other benign lesions was not statistically significant (P ¼ 0.353); in addition, endometriomas and teratomas showed similar ADC entropy as other benign lesions (P ¼ 0.853). The mean ADC of benign lesions was not significantly different from that of malignant lesions (P ¼ 0.768). However, the ADC entropy of benign lesions was significantly lower than that of malignant lesions (P ¼ 0.009). When endometriomas and teratomas were excluded, the other benign lesions continued to show no significant difference in mean ADC (P ¼ 0.833), but had significantly lower ADC entropy (P ¼ 0.016), compared with malignant lesions. Tables 2 and 3 show the diagnostic performance in distinguishing benign and malignant lesions, including and excluding endometriomas and teratomas, respectively. When including all lesions, significantly greater diagnostic accuracy was achieved for ADC entropy than for mean ADC (83.8% vs. 56.8%, P ¼ 0.018). After excluding endometriomas and teratomas, diagnostic accuracy was greater for ADC entropy than for mean ADC, although this was not statistically significant (76.9 vs. 61.5, P ¼ 0.246). Based on ROC analysis, mean ADC was most predictive of malignancy when greater than 2.15 10 3 mm 2 / sec. The greater likelihood of malignancy in the setting of higher mean ADC was due to the lower mean ADC in endometriomas and teratomas than in other lesions. After excluding endometriomas and teratomas, mean ADC was most predictive of malignancy when less than 2.34 10 3 mm 2 /sec. ADC entropy was most predictive of malignancy when greater than 4.92 when including all benign lesions and when greater than 4.91 when excluding endometriomas and teratomas. Representative examples of benign and malignant lesions are shown in Figures 1 3. Qualitative Analyses The diagnostic performance of the qualitative assessments of the two readers, in terms of differentiating Table 2 Diagnostic Performance of Mean Entropy, ADC Entropy, and Qualitative Reader Assessments, for Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Lesions, When Including All 39 Lesions in Study Cohort Test Accuracy Sens. Spec. NPV PPV Mean ADC 56.8% (21/37) 55.6% (5/9) 57.1% (16/28) 80.0% (16/20) 29.4% (5/17) ADC entropy 83.8% (31/37) 66.7% (6/9) 89.3% (25/28) 89.3% (25/28) 66.7% (6/9) R1, without DWI 73.0% (27/37) 66.7% (6/9) 75.0% (21/28) 87.5% (21/24) 46.2% (6/13) R1, with DWI 81.1% (30/37) 66.7% (6/9) 85.7% (24/28) 88.9% (24/27) 60.0% (6/10) R2, without DWI 97.3% (36/37) 88.9% (8/9) 100.0% (28/28) 96.6% (28/29) 100.0% (8/8) R2, with DWI 94.6% (35/37) 88.9% (8/9) 96.4% (27/28) 96.4% (27/28) 88.9% (8/9)

ADC Entropy of Adnexal Lesions 167 Table 3 Diagnostic Performance of Mean Entropy, ADC Entropy, and Qualitative Reader Assessments, for Distinguishing Benign and Malignant Lesions, When Excluding 11 Endometriomas and Teratomas Test Accuracy Sens. Spec. NPV PPV Mean ADC 61.5% (16/26) 77.8% (7/9) 52.9% (9/17) 81.8% (9/11) 46.7% (7/15) ADC entropy 76.9% (20/26) 66.7% (6/9) 82.4% (14/17) 82.4% (14/17) 66.7% (6/9) R1, without DWI 69.2% (18/26) 66.7% (6/9) 70.6% (12/17) 80.0% (12/15) 54.5% (6/11) R1, with DWI 76.9% (20/26) 66.7% (6/9) 82.4% (14/17) 82.4% (14/17) 66.7% (6/9) R2, without DWI 96.2% (25/26) 88.9% (8/9) 100% (17/17) 94.4% (17/18) 100% (8/8) R2, with DWI 92.3% (24/26) 88.9% (8/9) 94.1% (16/17) 94.1% (16/17) 88.9% (8/9) benign and malignant lesions, is included in Tables 2 and 3. When including all lesions, R1 s accuracy was 73.0% using conventional MRI alone, compared with 81.1% for conventional MRI combined with DWI. R2 s accuracy was 97.3% for conventional MRI alone, compared with 94.6% for conventional MRI combined with DWI. After excluding endometriomas and teratomas, R1 s accuracy during the two sessions was 69.2% and 76.0%, respectively, and R2 s accuracy was 96.2% and 92.3%, respectively. R2 s qualitative assessments using conventional MRI alone achieved significantly greater accuracy than mean ADC, ADC entropy, and R1 s qualitative assessments, irrespective of the inclusion of endometriomas and teratomas (P ¼ 0.003 0.039); in addition, R2 s qualitative assessments using conventional MRI combined with DWI achieved significantly greater accuracy than mean ADC and R1 s qualitative assessments, irrespective of the inclusion of endometriomas and teratomas (P ¼ 0.004 0.042). R1 s performance using conventional MRI combined with DWI achieved nearly significantly greater accuracy compared with mean ADC (P ¼ 0.050). No other comparison involving qualitative reader assessments was statistically significant (P > 0.10). Of the nine endometriomas, R1 correctly identified six of these as endometriomas during both sessions, whereas R2 correctly identified seven endometriomas during both sessions. Of the two teratomas, both readers correctly identified one as a teratoma during both sessions. DISCUSSION A number of studies have investigated the role of DWI in the characterization of adnexal lesions (3 6) and have proposed mean ADC as a metric that can aid in this assessment (6,15). However, results in the literature regarding the utility of ADC in discriminating benign and malignant adnexal lesions have been conflicting (5,6,9). In an early article on ovarian DWI, Moteki and Ishizaka (15) demonstrated significantly lower mean ADC in malignant than in benign cystic adnexal lesions, although only cystic elements were evaluated in their study. In addition, this study used a maximal b-value of 106 s/mm 2 ; this is much lower than b-values used in clinical practice today and indicates a strong perfusion contribution to their ADC measurements. On the other hand, Bakir et al and Fujii et al (3,9) both found no significant difference in mean ADC between benign and malignant adnexal lesions when evaluating the solid component. It was speculated that this overlap in mean ADC relates to desmoplastic stroma and interstitial edema in malignant lesions (3,9). In our study, when evaluating the mean ADC of entire adnexal lesions, including cystic and solid components, we similarly found no significant difference in mean ADC between benign and malignant lesions. In fact, the mean ADC of these two groups was nearly identical. The lack of a significantly lower ADC in malignant lesions, as has been observed in other tissues, in part could relate to the low ADC observed in endometriomas and teratomas. However, even when these lesions were excluded from analysis, substantial overlap in mean ADC between benign and malignant lesions continued to be observed. We note that the SD of mean ADC of benign lesions was approximately half the average value, and this large variability in mean ADC across benign lesions also likely contributed to the poor discrimination of benign and malignant lesions using this metric. ADC entropy represents the predictability of intensity characteristics within various tissues and increases as the distribution of signal intensities becomes more heterogeneous (10,12). In our study, there was a significant increase in ADC entropy in malignant adnexal lesions, and ADC entropy performed significantly better than mean ADC in discriminating benign and malignant adnexal lesions. The utility of ADC entropy in adnexal lesion characterization may reflect the sensitivity of entropy to macroscopic and microscopic cellular changes (12). Histopathologically, malignant epithelial ovarian tumors generally exhibit a mixture of cystic, papillary, and solid growth patterns, often with foci of necrosis, hemorrhage, and stromal invasion, while benign tumors generally have a more uniform composition (16). Our observation of increased ADC entropy within malignant adnexal lesions presumably reflects this increased structural heterogeneity within such lesions. Similar to previous studies, we demonstrated a lower mean ADC in endometriomas and teratomas compared with other adnexal lesions (6,9). This observation has been attributed to the intracystic clot within endometriomas and keratonoid substance within teratomas (6,9,17). Potentially, the low ADC within these particular benign lesions could confound assessment of DWI and contribute to a misinterpretation. Despite this difference in mean ADC, we observed endometriomas and teratomas to exhibit nearly identical ADC

168 Kierans et al. Figure 1. A 51-year-old female with pathologically confirmed left ovarian hemorrhagic cyst. a: Axial turbo-spin echo T2- weighted image shows cystic left ovarian lesion (arrow) that is predominantly T2-hyperintense, with internal areas of mildly decreased signal (asterisk). b: Subtracted postcontrast gradient-echo T1-weighted image shows an absence of internal enhancement in the lesion (arrow). c: Diffusion-weighted image with b-value of 500 s/mm 2 shows increased signal intensity throughout the mass (arrow). d: ADC map shows nearly homogeneous low ADC within the mass (arrow). d: Sample of several slices of ADC map from whole-lesion volume-of-interest analysis showing inclusion of all lesion voxels on all slices within ADC measurement. Whole-lesion volume-of-interest analysis yielded mean ADC of 0.66 10 3 mm 2 /s and ADC entropy of 3.84. The low ADC entropy was consistent with benignity in our cohort. entropy as other benign lesions. Furthermore, teratomas and endometriomas have highly specific characteristic imaging features on conventional MRI sequences that often allow for a definitive diagnosis (1,17) and thus obviate the need for additional functional sequences such as DWI to provide a diagnosis. Indeed, the majority of endometriomas and teratomas were correctly identified as such by both readers in our study, whether or not DWI was included during their subjective assessments. We had two abdominal radiologists with different levels of experience qualitatively evaluate all lesions, both with and without DWI, to compare the performance of these subjective assessments with the quantitative metrics of mean and entropy of ADC. This analysis suggested a possible benefit of qualitative DWI

ADC Entropy of Adnexal Lesions 169 Figure 2. A 40-year-old female with pathologically confirmed right ovarian endometriotic cyst. a: Coronal turbo-spin echo T2-weighted image shows cystic right ovarian lesion with diffuse internal T2-hypointensity (arrow). b: Unenhanced fat-suppressed gradient-echo T1-weighted image shows diffuse internal T1-hyperintensity within the mass (arrow). c: Diffusionweighted image with b-value of 500 s/mm 2 shows increased signal intensity throughout the mass (arrow). d: ADC map shows nearly homogeneous low ADC within the mass (arrow). Whole-lesion VOI analysis yielded mean ADC of 1.57 10 3 mm 2 /s and ADC entropy of 3.97. The low ADC entropy was consistent with benignity in our cohort. assessment for the less experienced radiologist. This reader s accuracy increased from 73% to 81% after including DWI; lack of statistical significance of this increase may relate to the small number of malignant lesions in our cohort. This reader s performance, whether or not including DWI, was greater than that of mean ADC. Alternatively, ADC entropy had an accuracy of 84%, which was similar to this reader s performance when including DWI. However, an advantage of ADC entropy was that this metric incorporated all lesion voxels, whether cystic or solid, on all slices that included the mass. This approach allowed for a straightforward and objective measurement, mitigating the subjectivity inherent in placement of a small region-of-interest within a selected portion of a lesion. On this basis, ADC entropy may serve as a useful quantitative metric for adnexal lesion evaluation for less experienced readers. It is interesting to note that the more experienced radiologist did not benefit from incorporation of qualitative DWI assessments in adnexal lesion characterization. This radiologist had 15 years of experience in women s imaging and achieved 97% accuracy using conventional MRI alone, correctly classifying 36 of 37 lesions during this session. This nearly perfect performance using conventional MRI alone essentially precluded the ability to demonstrate a substantial benefit from any additional functional MR technique. The primary limitation of our study was the relatively small number of malignant lesions. This was due to the requirement of surgical resection and a histopathologic reference standard for all lesions, a feature that we feel reflects a key strength of our study. Further prospective studies would be helpful to validate our preliminary observations regarding a potential role of ADC entropy in assisting adnexal lesion

170 Kierans et al. Figure 3. A 70-year-old female with pathologically confirmed right ovarian malignant mixed Mullerian tumor. a: Sagittal turbo-spin echo T2-weighted image shows large complex mixed cystic and solid right ovarian mass (arrow). b: Subtracted axial postcontrast gradient-echo T1-weighted image shows extensive solid enhancement within the right lateral aspect of the mass (arrow). c: Diffusion-weighted image with b-value of 500 s/mm 2 shows increased signal intensity predominantly with the right lateral aspect of the mass (arrow). d: ADC map shows heterogeneous ADC of the map, with areas of both low (solid arrow) and high (dashed arrow) ADC. e: Section of tumor shows carcinoma (malignant epithelial) component in lower portion with sarcomatous component in upper portion. Frequent mitotic figures are present in the atypical neoplastic cells of both the malignant compacted epithelial and loosely arranged sarcomatous components (H&E stain; 400). Whole-lesion VOI analysis yielded mean ADC of 1.43 10 3 mm 2 /s and ADC entropy of 5.46. The high ADC entropy was consistent with malignancy in our cohort. [Color figure can be viewed in the online issue, which is available at wileyonlinelibrary.com.]

ADC Entropy of Adnexal Lesions 171 characterization. In addition, we note that recent studies have shown potential of other functional techniques such as DWI with biexponential fitting (18), MR spectroscopy (19), and quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (20) in adnexal lesion characterization; these techniques may also be worthwhile to pursue given the limited utility of mean ADC that was observed in this study. In conclusion, ADC entropy exhibited significantly greater accuracy than the more traditional metric of mean ADC in distinguishing benign and malignant adnexal lesions. An advantage of ADC entropy was that it was measured in a straightforward and objective fashion by incorporating all lesion voxels. However, our data indicate that the potential benefit of entropy measurement decreases with greater reader experience. REFERENCES 1. Imaoka I, Wada A, Kaji Y, et al. Developing an MR imaging strategy for diagnosis of ovarian masses. Radiographics 2006;26: 1431 1448. 2. Jung S, Lee J, Rha S, Byun J, Jung J, Hahn S. CT and MR imaging of ovarian tumors with emphasis on differential diagnosis. Radiographics 2002;22:1305 1325. 3. Bakir B, Bakan S, Tunaci M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging of solid or predominantly solid gynaecological adnexial masses: is it useful in the differential diagnosis? Br J Radiol 2011;84: 600 611. 4. Guo Y, Cai Y, Cai Z, et al. Differentiation of clinically benign and malignant breast lesions using diffusion-weighted imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2002;16:172 178. 5. Katayama M, Masui T, Kobayashi S, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo planar imaging of ovarian tumors: is it useful to measure apparent diffusion coefficients? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002; 26:250 256. 6. Nakayama T, Yoshimitsu K, Irie H, et al. Diffusion-weighted echoplanar MR imaging and ADC mapping in the differential diagnosis of ovarian cystic masses: usefulness of detecting keratinoid substances in mature cystic teratomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2005;22:271 278. 7. Thoeny HC, De Keyzer F. Extracranial applications of diffusionweighted magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Radiol 2007;17: 1385 1393. 8. Sugahara T KY, Kochi M, Ikushima I, et al. Usefulness of diffusion-weighted MRI with echo-planar technique in the evaluation of cellularity in gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;9:53 60. 9. Fujii S, Kakite S, Nishihara K, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of diffusion-weighted imaging in differentiating benign from malignant ovarian lesions. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;25:1149 1156. 10. Tavazzi E, Dwyer M, Weinstock-Guttman B, et al. Quantitative diffusion weighted imaging measures in patients with multiple sclerosis. Neuroimage 2007;36:746 754. 11. Fujimoto K, Tonan T, Azuma S, et al. Evaluation of the mean and entropy of apparent diffusion coefficient values in chronic hepatitis C: correlation with pathologic fibrosis stage and inflammatory activity grade. Radiology 2011;258:739 748. 12. Benedict R, Bruce J, Dwyer M, et al. Diffusion-weighted imaging predicts cognitive impairment in multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler 2007;13:722 730. 13. Woodward PJ, Sohaey R, Mezzetti TP Jr. Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2001;21:193 216; questionnaire 88 94. 14. Park SB, Kim JK, Kim KR, Cho KS. Imaging findings of complications and unusual manifestations of ovarian teratomas. Radiographics 2008;28:969 983. 15. Moteki T, Ishizaka H. Evaluation of cystic ovarian lesions using apparent diffusion coefficient calculated from reordered turboflash MR images. Magn Reson Imaging 1999;17:955 963. 16. Kaku T, Ogawa S, Kawano Y, et al. Histological classification of ovarian cancer. Med Electron Microsc 2003;36:9 17. 17. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Kimura I, Tsuda Y, Yamashita K. Endometrial cysts: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 1991;180:73 78. 18. Morita S, Kojima S, Hirata M, Suzuki K, Ueno E. Perfusion fraction of diffusion-weighted MRI for predicting the presence of blood supply in ovarian masses. J Magn Reson Imaging 2011;34: 1131 1136. 19. Esseridou A, Di Leo G, Sconfienza LM, et al. In vivo detection of choline in ovarian tumors using 3D magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Invest Radiol 2011;46:377 382. 20. Thomassin-Naggara I, Balvay D, Aubert E, et al. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging analysis of complex adnexal masses: a preliminary study. Eur Radiol 2012;22:738 745.