DETERMINATION OF NOISE EXPOSURE LEVEL AT CONSTRUCTION AREA Ishak Baba 1, Zarina Md Ali 2, Nurdiana Ashraf Abu Bakar 3 and Mohmad Zairi Ramly 4 1,2

Similar documents
Hearing Conservation Program

Simultaneous Measurement of At Ear and Shoulder Noise Exposures

Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual

Hearing Conservation Program April 27, 2018

HEARING CONSERVATION PROCEDURE

Hearing Conservation

Hearing Conservation Program

Procedure. Procedure

East Carolina University

Craven Community College HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE OCCUPATIONAL NOISE

Santa Clarita Community College District HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Revised

North Dakota State University Noise/Hearing Conservation

Delaware State University

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program

Safety Services Guidance. Occupational Noise

NOISE CONTROL AND HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

CCS Administrative Procedure H Hearing Conservation

Before taking field measurements, it is important to determine the type of information required. The person making the measurement must understand:

Methods of validation of occupational noise exposure measurement with multi aspect personal sound exposure meter

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program Table of Contents

Hearing Conservation Program

CITY OF FORT BRAGG HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

Model Safety Program

Hearing Conservation Program

Procedure Number 310 TVA Safety Procedure Page 1 of 6 Hearing Conservation Revision 0 January 6, 2003

KEYWORDS: workshop, sound level meter, time weight average, dose, noise exposure.

Hearing Conservation Program Regulations and Recommendations Summary

11. Hearing Conservation Program Chapter , WAC

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

SAINT MARY S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Prepared by SAINT MARY S COLLEGE OF CA MORAGA, CA KAREN LAURICELLA

Hearing Conservation Program

Effective Date: 27-February Table of Contents

ACOUSTIC INFRASOUND AND LOW-FREQUENCY SOUND

Hearing Conservation Plan

SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY S WRITTEN HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM December 2017

HEARING CONSERVATION PURPOSE

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Texas Christian University

UCSD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S) and Center for Occupational & Environmental Medicine (COEM) 2017

Health, Safety, Security and Environment

This program is designed to prevent hearing loss for students, staff and employees while engaged in universitysponsored

noise induced Working Together to Prevent Hearing Loss

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Plan

3M Center for Hearing Conservation

Workplace Noise Surveys: A Hands-On Measurement Workshop

Environmental Health & Safety Programs

NC Employees Workplace Program Requirements for Safety and Health. Hearing Conservation

Hearing Conservation Program. Southwestern Community College. Office of Human Resources

Contents. 1) Purpose ) Policy ) Definitions ) Procedure a) Requirements b) Noise standard... 4

HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES

MAXPRO200 Plasma Cutting System Acoustic Noise Level Measurements

Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

workplace includes, any land, premises, location, vessel or thing, at, in, upon, or near which, a worker is, in the course of employment.

A case study of construction noise exposure for preserving worker s hearing in Egypt

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Measurement Method for Noise Exposure of Jobs of the Construction Sector

Villanova University Department of Environmental Health and Safety Policy and Procedure Manual

Hearing Conservation Program. Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053

SNAP-ON INCORPORATED STANDARD ON HEARING CONSERVATION

Health Standards to Protect Miners from Hearing Loss

FACTORIES ACT (CHAPTER 104, SECTION 102 (1)) FACTORIES (NOISE) REGULATIONS

Protect Your Hearing

NOISE & HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM YALE UNIVERSITY

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM (HCP)

Page104. Hearing Conservation Program

Occupational Noise Exposure

NOISE SURVEY. EQUIPMENT: Sound Level Meter Octave Band Analyzer Dosimeters Sound Calibrator Survey Sheets Tape measure SP 10

Organisation Internationale de Métrologie Légale

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY HEADQUARTERS UNITED STATES MARINE CORPS 2 NAVY ANNEX WASHINGTON, DC

INDH 5131 Controls of Occupational Hazards. Noise & Hearing Conservation. Part II. V. Audiometric Testing

Hearing Conservation Terminology Courtesy of Workplace Integra, Inc.

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

The University of Texas at El Paso

Please refer to the body corporate s registered bylaws in relation to domestic noise.

29 CFR OCCUPATIONAL NOISE EXPOSURE

ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

INTERNATIONAL MODULE SYLLABUS W503 NOISE MEASUREMENT AND ITS EFFECTS

Hearing Conservation Program

Prepared By: Blake Smith/James Stubbs

NOISE SURVEY REPORT EXAMPLE COMPANY PROCESSING PLANT

Mine Acoustics. Ventilation Lab. #4. March 4, Introduction

Evaluation the Best Distance between Noise Generation and Receptor for A Noise Barrier Construction around an Expressway in Malaysia

Earplug Attenuation Validation As Part of a Hearing Conservation Program. David Friedman, CIH,MSPH, ARM Luminant

LISTEN! You might be going deaf DEPARTMENT OF LABOUR TE TARI MAHI OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY & HEALTH SERVICE

Rutgers Environmental Health and Safety (REHS)

San Diego Community College OSHA Standards

NOISE IN THE WORKPLACE

Town of Brunswick. Hearing Conservation Plan

Purpose: To provide a process to protect employees from hearing loss caused by excessive occupational exposure to noise.

Hearing Conservation. Wear a Protective Hearing Device NOW... or Wear a Hearing Aid LATER. Workers Health & Safety. Provided by

A STUDY UPON OCCUPATIONAL NOISE POLLUTION EXPOSURE AT A METALLIC CONFECTIONS PLANT

UC Merced Hearing Conservation Program

Transcription:

Proceeding of International Seminar on Application of Science Matehmatics 2011 (ISASM2011) PWTC, KL, Nov, 1-3, 2011 DETERMINATION OF NOISE EXPOSURE LEVEL AT CONSTRUCTION AREA Ishak Baba 1, Zarina Md Ali 2, Nurdiana Ashraf Abu Bakar 3 and Mohmad Zairi Ramly 4 1,2 Faculty of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia 86400 Parit Raja Batu Pahat, Johor MALAYSIA. 1 ishak@uthm.edu.my, 2 zarinaa@uthm.edu.my, 3 dyan_mei@yahoo.com.my, 4 mzairi@kbs.gov.my The purpose of this study is to determine the noise exposure level among the workers that working in construction area. The study was carried out at construction sites and workshop. The data of noise level was collected by using Noise Dosimeter (SIE95) and analysed by dbtrait software. Result shows the maximum of noise dose (D) for Sri Gading and UTHM is approximately 43% and 28% respectively, while time weighted average noise level (TWA) for these sites is about 84 db (A) and 80.8 db (A) respectively. IKBN recorded maximum of noise dose (D) and average noise level (TWA) is 88 db (A) and 75.8% respectively. The level of noise exposure at selected areas is in acceptable range based on regulation. As conclusion, workers who at the areas are advisable to wear hearing protection device when construction activities take place in order to civilize safety practice in the industry field. Keywords : Noise exposure, construction area, TWA, noise dose Scope: Engineering 1. INTRODUCTION Noise in unwanted sound that may be unnoticed caused some psychological and physical stress to living as well as non living objects [1-2]. Construction activity is one of the sources of noise pollution besides road traffic, manufacturing processes etc. Levels of noise (TWA) for industrial area is recorded as 75dB (A) and 70dB (A) in day and night time respectively based on ambient noise standard [3]. Several studies were made and published regarding to sources and effects of noise [1-5]. It is clear that the construction worker will has hearing loss if they expose to very high noise levels for considerable lengths of time [4]. The permissible noise exposure for worker to receive is 90 db(a) for 8 hour working hours; equivalent to 100% of noise exposure [6-7]. Table 1 lists the permissible noise exposure per day and while, Table 2 tabulates the noise dose per day based on the TWA db (A). Due to the importance of this matter regarding to workers health, this study was undertaken to determine the noise exposure level among the workers that working in construction area. 1

Table 1. Permissible Noise Exposure [6] Duration per day, hours Noise Level db (A) slow response 8 90 6 92 4 95 3 97 2 100 1 ½ 102 1 105 ½ 110 ¼ or less 115 Table 2. Conversion from Noise Dose to 8 hours time weighted average noise level (TWA) [8] Percentage Noise TWA db (A) Exposure or Dose (%) 25 80 50 85 100 90 200 95 400 100 800 105 2. METHODS AND DATA COLLECTION 2.1 Sampling The study has been carried out at three different location; i.e Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM), Institut Kemahiran Belia Negara (IKBN) Dusun Tua, Hulu Langat dan Sri Gading as shown in Figure 1. (a) At Construction site in Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM) (b) At Construction site in Sri Gading Fig 1. Locations of observation area (c) At construction workshop in IKBN Dusun Tua 2

Proceeding of International Seminar on Application of Science Matehmatics 2011 (ISASM2011) PWTC, KL, Nov, 1-3, 2011 Data sampling at UTHM and Sri Gading as in Fig 1 (a) and (b) respectively were carried out during a day working hour or at least 8 hours per day within 2 months. During observation, data was recorded 4 times through workers that operate 4 selected machines as samples; i.e lorry, excavator, backhoe and back pusher that have been used in the construction site. Meanwhile, observation of noise level that caused by hand tools; i.e grinder was carried out at construction workshop as shown in Fig 1 (c) within 2 months. 30 students were offered to involve in noise level measurent during 2 hours of laboratory activities. This finding will be compared to noise level that caused by machinery. 2.2 Noise Dosimeter Noise levels were measured by using a Noise Dosimeter (SIE95) which is function to measure exposure level sound based on noise exposure regulation [6]. The dosimeter gives total noise dose to which worker has been exposed during the day. A 5 db(a) exchange rate was used to calculate personal exposures. This was based on maximum exposure of 90 db(a) over 8 hour working hours. This equipment was operated by using battery with size of 6F22 9V and microphone to catch sound. The calibration process was done for this apparatus by set one audible tone with accurate level and frequency which is 114 db (A). The apparatus is worn by the worker for entire work day/shift. When the work shift noise exposure is composed of two or more periods of noise at different levels, the total noise dose over the work day is given by: D = 100 (C 1 /T 1 ) + (C 2 /T 2 ) +... + (C n /T n ) (1) Where, D = noise dose (%), C = actual time noise exposure and T = recommended exposure limit [6]. The eight hour time weighted average noise level (TWA) in decibels, may be computed from the dose, in percent, by this following formula: TWA = 16.61 log 10 (D/12.5T) + 90 (2) For an eight hour workshift with the noise level constant over the entire shift, the TWA is equal to the measured sound level [6]. Data then was analysed by using dbtrait software to produce the output. 3. RESULT AND DISCUSSION 3.1 Time weighted average noise level (TWA) It is necessary to compute value of TWA for these construction activities in determining the noise exposure received by the workers. Similarity has been noticed at both sites in Fig 3, which are almost 38% of samples yield TWA ± 90 db (A) and backhoe contributes less among machinery. 3

(a) Sri Gading (b) UTHM Fig 3 Time weighted average noise level (TWA) for four types of machinery at construction site in Sri Gading and UTHM Fig 4 shows the time weighted average noise level (TWA) which is obtained from 30 students who are carried out their work project at construction workshop in IKBN, Hulu Langat. These hand tools activities were included in impulse noise because the occurrence is not continuously. The result shows the maximum and minimum of TWA is 88 db (A) and 46 db (A) respectively. 3.3 Noise Dose Fig 4. Time weighted average noise level (TWA) for 30 students at construction workshop in IKBN, Hulu Langat Noise dose is an important matter that needs to be figured out based on (TWA) for 8 hours per day as tabulated in Table 2. From Fig 5, almost 38% of samples obtained 100% of noise dose, where TWA have reached permissible noise exposure limit, is 90 db (A). The dominant machinery contributor at the construction site in Sri Gading and UTHM is lorry and excavator respectively. While at IKBN as shown in Fig 6, the range of noise dose is from 0.2 to 75.8%. In addition, approximately 60% of workers (students) received noise dose below 10dB (A). 4

Proceeding of International Seminar on Application of Science Matehmatics 2011 (ISASM2011) PWTC, KL, Nov, 1-3, 2011 (a) Sri Gading (b) UTHM Fig 5 Noise dose for four types of machinery at construction site in Sri Gading and UTHM Fig 6 Noise dose for 30 students worked at construction workshop in IKBN, Hulu Langat The average of TWA and noise dose for construction sites are tabulated in Table 3. Almost all workers received noise exposure less than 100% except workers that handling excavator machine. The backhoe and back pusher constributed minimal level of noise exposure. Type of Machinery Table 3. Average of TWA and noise dose for Construction Sites Sri Gading UTHM TWA, db(a) Dose, % TWA, db(a) Dose, % Lorry 88.65 83 85.2 51 Excavator 88.97 87 90.15 100 Backhoe 75.08 13 65.26 5 Back Pusher 82.85 37 82.57 36 4. CONCLUSIONS As conclusion, maximum of noise dose (D) for Sri Gading and UTHM is approximately 43% and 28% respectively, while time weighted average noise level (TWA) those site is about 84 db (A) and 80.8 db (A) respectively. Nevertheless, the 5

students from IKBN recorded maximum of noise dose (D) and average noise level (TWA) is 88 db (A) and 75.8%. The level of noise exposure at selected areas is in acceptable range based on regulation and workers are in harmless stage. However, the usage of hearing protection device; i.e ear plug and ear muff shall be investigated through questionnaire to determine the awareness and hearing loss among workers for future understanding. In addition, workers who at the construction areas are advisable to wear hearing protection device when construction activities take place because 20% of overexpose situations were reduced to levels below 85 db(a) through the use of hearing protection device [5] and also to civilize safety practice in the industry field. References [1] Singh, D. and Joshi, B.D. (2010). Study of The Noise Pollution for Three Consecutive Years During Deepavali Festival in Meerut City, Uttar Pradesh, New York Science Journal, 3 (6): 40-42. [2] Quitana, S.; Fernandez, M.D.; Chavarria, N. Ballesteros, J.A. and Gonzalez, I. (2008). Measurement Method for Noise Exposure of Jobs of the Construction Sector, Proceeding of Acoustics 08 Paris Conferences, 4889-4893 [3] Singh, N. and Davar, S.C. (2004). Noise Pollution-Sources, Effects and Control, J. Hum. Ecol., 16(3):181-187 [4] Alice, H.S. (2002). Construction Noise: Exposure, Effect, and The Potential for Remediation; A Renew and Analysis, AIHA Journal, 63:768-789. [5] Neitzel, R.; and Seixas, N. (2005). The Effectiveness of Hearing Protection Among Construction Workers, J. Occupational and Environmental Hygiene, 2:227-238 [6] Factories and Machinery Act and Regulations-ACT 139, MDC Publishers Sdn Bhd, Kuala Lumpur [7] Occupational Safety and Health Act and Regulations-ACT 514, MDC Publishers Sdn Bhd, Kuala Lumpur [8] Ishak Baba, Ismail Bahari, Mohd Jailani Mohd Nor and Anuar Mohd Mokhtar. (2005). Noise Exposure in Wood Base Industries-Moulding and Saw Mill, Proceeding of Seminar on Advanced in Malaysian Noise Vibration and Comfort (NVC 2005), 169-184 6