Qualitative Research

Similar documents
School of Nursing, University of British Columbia Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Qualitative Research Design

How behavioural research can identify factors which influence the patient s experience. Margaret Brown

Social surveys Definition: Key Terms. Types of Survey. Revising Social Surveys Task 1 - Social Surveys The Basics. Pre-coded, or closed questions

Choosing a Research Approach

Qualitative Study Design. Professor Desley Hegney, Director of Research, Alice Lee Centre for Nursing Studies, National University of Singapore.

Qualitative Research Theoretical Orientations. ScWk 240 Week 10 Slides

CRITICAL APPRAISAL OF QUALITATIVE STUDIES

HOW TO IDENTIFY A RESEARCH QUESTION? How to Extract a Question from a Topic that Interests You?

positivist phenomenological

Problem Situation Form for Parents

Patient First. Aneurin Bevan University Health Board. Personal Responsibility. Values and Behaviours Framework. Passion for Improvement

CHAPTER 3. Methodology

SURVEY ABOUT YOUR PRESCRIPTION CHOICES

NR , CCNE: Reducing Your Risk for Type 2 Diabetes

I. Identifying the question Define Research Hypothesis and Questions

- Purposive sampling: Selecting a group of individuals who are likely to have relevant

A Guide to Reading a Clinical or Research Publication

DOING SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH C H A P T E R 3

P H E N O M E N O L O G Y

support support support STAND BY ENCOURAGE AFFIRM STRENGTHEN PROMOTE JOIN IN SOLIDARITY Phase 3 ASSIST of the SASA! Community Mobilization Approach

1/26/17 QUALITATIVE RESEARCH INTRODUCTIONS LEARNING OBJECTIVES QUALITATIVE RESEARCH WHAT IS QUALITATIVE RESEARCH?

Title: Identifying work ability promoting factors for home care aides and assistant nurses

PEER REVIEW HISTORY ARTICLE DETAILS VERSION 1 - REVIEW. Veronika Williams University of Oxford, UK 07-Dec-2015

Qualitative research. An introduction. Characteristics. Characteristics. Characteristics. Qualitative methods. History

Choosing Life: Empowerment, Action, Results! CLEAR Menu Sessions. Health Care 3: Partnering In My Care and Treatment

CHAPTER 7 QUALITATIVE RESEARCH TOOLS

PROVIDENCE CHRISTIAN COLLEGE INSTITUTIONAL REVIEW BOARD APPLICATION TO USE HUMAN PARTICIPANTS IN RESEARCH

Just what research design am I using? Shona J. Kelly Professor of Interdisciplinary Research

Using grounded theory to write qualitative findings with reflective journals

Higher Psychology RESEARCH REVISION

Lesson 3.1 What is Qualitative Research? Qualitative Research

CREATING (??) A SAFETY CULTURE. Robert L Carraway, Darden School of Business 2013 Air Charter Safety Symposium February 2013

MONTANA S PEER NETWORK 40 HOUR PEER SUPPORT 101 TRAINING APPLICATION

Patient Reported Outcomes (PROs) Tools for Measurement of Health Related Quality of Life

Self-management in chronic illness: from theory to the practice

Chapter 8 Intake Interviewing and Report Writing. Chapter Orientation. Learning Objectives. Rick Grieve, Ph.D. PSY 442 Western Kentucky University

Counselor Education CE 890 Counseling Theories and Practice. Graduate School Westminster College (cell)

Health Care Callback Survey Topline August 2001

Informed Consent Flipchart. Version 1.0, 30 Jan 2018

Editors Jeffrey H. D. Cornelius-White Renate Motschnig-Pitrik Michael Lux. SPRINGER Science + Business Media, New York, 2013

IAT 801 Qualitative Research Methods - Four Different Traditions, Week 2

Chaos Theory. Homeostasis in Career Chaos. Theoretical Approach. Purpose of the Study

Dementia Care in the Acute Care Setting

The Beauty of the Logic Model A Practical Approach to Developing and Using the Logic Model

Qualitative Social Research for Rural Development Studies

Selecting and Interpreting Lab Results -

We Can Test the Experience Machine. Response to Basil SMITH Can We Test the Experience Machine? Ethical Perspectives 18 (2011):

PRACTICE SAMPLES CURRICULUM VITAE

Clinical Epidemiology for the uninitiated

Cancer Survivorship Connection Website Process Evaluation Cancer Survivorship Conference: Up Close & Personal

Participatory Design

Culturally Sensitive Palliative Care Part I: Self-Reflection. Amy Wilson, RN, BSN, CHPN Marquette General Home Health and Hospice Escanaba, MI

Culturally Competent: Racial- & Ethnic- Sensitive Practice

SAAS Medstar. Adelaide Airport MD2. Clinical Director, MedSTAR Kids.

Title: Health Care Professionals' Attitudes Regarding Palliative Care for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure: An Interview Study

Professional Boundaries in a Therapeutic Relationship

Doing High Quality Field Research. Kim Elsbach University of California, Davis

Career Counseling and Services: A Cognitive Information Processing Approach

HE Model for Sepsis POCT

COMMUNICATION TIPS FOR SUCCESSFUL COMMUNICATION DURING ALL STAGES OF ALZHEIMER S DISEASE

Choosing Life: Empowerment, Action, Results! CLEAR Menu Sessions. Substance Use Risk 5: Drugs, Alcohol, and HIV

A to Z OF RESEARCH METHODS AND TERMS APPLICABLE WITHIN SOCIAL SCIENCE RESEARCH

Supervised Injection Site Community Survey Results

Asking & Answering Sociological Questions

Interactive voice response system pre-screening for depression with Spanish-speaking populations

DECISION QUALITY WORKSHEET TREATMENTS FOR DEPRESSION

Sample MSW Foundation (1 st Year) Learning Agreement

Service-Learning Student Evaluation Annual Report

ESHRE Campus Workshop

Quantitative Approaches to ERRE

2. Definition of Research. 3. When Is Ethics Approval Required? 4. SAE EU Scholarship and Research Ethics Committee Membership. 4.2.

Smoke Free Policy. Printed copies must not be considered the definitive version. Policy Group. Author Version no 3.0

3.1.2 Change, Loss, and Grief

HIV/AIDS Tool Kit. A. Introduction

Inheriting Breast Cancer: Genetic counseling for the BRCA 1 and BRCA 2 genes. Erin Kern. University of Kansas School of Nursing

SFHPT36 Manage the ending of family and systemic therapy

BASIC VOLUME. Elements of Drug Dependence Treatment

MRS Best Practice Guide on Research Participant Vulnerability

Types of Research (Quantitative and Qualitative)

Sean Bruna-Lewis, MA, PhD(c) Ethnology & Linguistics Department of Anthropology University of New Mexico GRC Fall Lecture Series October 9, 2012

Work, Employment, and Industrial Relations Theory Spring 2008

Inferences: What inferences about the hypotheses and questions can be made based on the results?

Building Emotional Intelligence. Presented by: Andria Hill-Lehr

What Constitutes a Good Contribution to the Literature (Body of Knowledge)?

Providing Equally Effective Communication

GCSE EXAMINERS' REPORTS

400 Hour Evaluation of Student Learning Form Concordia University Social Work Practicum Program

University of Georgia School of Social Work SOWK 7055 Field Instructor Evaluation Clinical Competencies-1st Semester FACE SHEET

CHAPTER 3 METHOD AND PROCEDURE

Conducting Research in the Social Sciences. Rick Balkin, Ph.D., LPC-S, NCC

Psychology and personality ASSESSMENT

In this second module, we will focus on features that distinguish quantitative and qualitative research projects.

This report summarizes the stakeholder feedback that was received through the online survey.

JOB DESCRIPTION. Sessional Youth Worker (Lothian) April 2018

@sssftnhs. sssft.nhs.uk

EMPATHY AND COMMUNICATION A MODEL OF EMPATHY DEVELOPMENT

Rationale and Types of Research in Obstetrics and Gynaecology.. Professor Friday Okonofua

plural noun 1. a system of moral principles: the ethics of a culture. 2. the rules of conduct recognized in respect to a particular group, culture,

What is a clinical psychologist?

Transcription:

Qualitative Research THE READER S COMPANION WORKSHEET Article Title: Author(s): TITLE Topic of interest Yes No Maybe Method of interest Yes No Maybe Population of interest Yes No Maybe ABSTRACT Results useful Yes No Maybe INTRODUCTION Why is the study being done (i.e., the problem, concern, issue)? What is the purpose of the study or the question(s) that the investigator is trying to answer (e.g., literature review)? What are the central concepts (e.g., pain, grief, nursing work)? Are most of the references recent (less than 5 years old)? Yes No If no, is this a classic/groundbreaking reference or one that has re-emerged in importance (i.e., research relating to tuberculosis)? Are experts cited? Yes No Not sure

METHODS Design What is the research design (e.g., case study, grounded theory, phenomenology, historical research)? Is the research design appropriate to answer the research question? Yes No Not sure Sample What are the characteristics of the participants who were included and excluded from the study (e.g., health status, age, education, gender, ethnicity, occupation, socio-economic status)? Included: Excluded: Does the selection of the participants fit with the concept being studied? Yes No Not sure Where were the participants recruited (e.g., self-help group, clinical unit)? What were the procedures for choosing participants (e.g., purposively selected, snowball technique)?

Human Rights Protection Was informed consent obtained? Yes No Was the participant reasonably able to take part? Yes No Was the study potentially/actually harmful to participants/others? Yes No List any ethical principles ignored (e.g., truthfulness, confidentiality). Setting What was the setting in which the data were collected? Busy unit Home setting Private room Other Data Collection What strategy or strategies were used for the data collection? Focus group Structured interview Unstructured interview Observation Other Did the researcher explain his or her role in the data collection process? Yes No Not stated How were the data recorded (e.g., field notes, tape-recorded, videotaped)? Was data saturation reached? Yes No Not stated Not applicable Data Analysis What methods of data analysis were used (i.e., how were the categories/ themes derived, constant comparison)?

Were the data analyzed inductively? Yes No Not stated Were strategies used to ensure rigour/trustworthiness? Yes No Not stated If yes, what were they (e.g., review by others, exemplars provided, audit trail)? Did the researcher critically examine his or her own role, assumptions, and preconceptions? Yes No Not sure RESULTS AND DISCUSSION What are the main findings of the study (i.e., major categories/themes that emerged)? What information is presented in figures or tables? Are they easy to understand or confusing? Do you agree with the investigator s interpretation of the results? Yes No Are the results consistent with past research? Yes No Not applicable

Does the interpretation make sense theoretically? Yes No Not applicable Does the interpretation offer any ideas that you can use? Yes No Not applicable OVERALL IMPRESSIONS Overall, is the article important or significant for the practice of health care? Yes No Do the findings resonate (seem correct and familiar) with you and your practice? Yes No If yes, why? Major limitations of the study (2 or 3): Major strengths of the study (2 or 3): Are the results transferable? Yes No Not sure USING RESEARCH RESULTS Are the participants similar to those in your setting? Yes No Somewhat

Once you feel somewhat comfortable with the information in the study, ask yourself these questions: Will information from the study help with the following? Understanding clients perspectives: Assessment: Procedure/protocol: Interventions: Interpersonal relationships: Quality improvement programs: Work life/environment: Education programs: Other: Are the findings consistent with policies, procedures, and standards? Require new policy: Yes No Not sure Require new procedure: Yes No Not sure Require new standard: Yes No Not sure Can safety be maintained? Yes No Not sure Do you think the findings are acceptable to the following people? Clients: Yes No Not sure Administrators: Yes No Not sure Colleagues: Yes No Not sure Other professionals: Yes No Not sure Are the following required for using the results? Equipment: Yes No Staff: Yes No Time: Yes No Money: Yes No Knowledge/skills: Yes No Attitude change: Yes No Is the benefit worth the effort of obtaining the resources and changing practice? Yes No Why or why not?