AppNote 1/2005. Blood Alcohol Analysis Using an Automated Static Headspace Method ABSTRACT

Similar documents
AppNote 3/2013. Automated Determination of Total Fat, Saturated Fat, Monounsaturated Fat and Trans Fat Content in Food Samples KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

AppNote 5/2010. A Novel Automated Blood Analyzer for the Determination of Immunosuppressants in Whole Blood INTRODUCTION

Quantitative Determination of Terpenes in Cannabis Using Headspace Solid Phase Microextraction and GC/MS

AppNote 3/2008. Determination of Aldehydes and Ketones in Oily Matrices using a Novel Dynamic Headspace Sampler Coupled to GC/MS INTRODUCTION

AppNote 4/2002. Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction: Capacity and Competition Effects KEYWORDS ABSTRACT. SBSE, SPME, capacity

Direct Thermal Extraction Analysis of Food Packaging Material

AppNote 1/2015. Automated Sample Preparation for Metabolomics Studies Using the Gerstel MPS Dual Head WorkStation

AppNote 4/2015. Automated Desorption, SPE Extraction, and LC/MS/MS Analysis of Dried Blood Spots KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS ABSTRACT. 3-MCPD, Glycidol, edible oil, lab automation, ISO , AOCS Cd 29c-13, DGF C-VI 18 (10)

AppNote 10/2002. Detection of Spoilage Markers in Food Products using a Mass-Spectrometry Based Chemical Sensor KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

KEYWORDS ABSTRACT AppNote 3/2002

Automated Hydrolysis, Extraction and Determination of Opioids in Urine using a Novel Robotic Autosampler and LC-MS/MS Platform

AppNote 8/2007. Rapid Multidimensional GC Analysis of Trace Drugs in Complex Matrices KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

Forensic Analysis of Blood Alcohol Concentration

Drugs of Abuse in Oral Fluids: Automated SPE Extraction and LC/MS/MS Determination using a Robotic Autosampler

AppNote 3/2001. Elimination of Polar Matrix Components Prior to GC Analysis using Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction (SBSE) KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

AppNote 11/2008. Analysis of Drugs and Metabolites in Blood and Urine using Automated Disposable Pipette Extraction KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

AppNote 2/2014. Fully Automated SPE-GC/MS Determination of Δ9-Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and its Metabolites in Serum Samples KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

Blood Alcohol Determination with Teledyne Tekmar HT3 Automated Static/Dynamic Headspace Analyzer Application Note Introduction

AppNote 4/1994. Identification of Furan Fatty Acids as Minor Components of Human Lipids by Multidimensional GC-MSD

AppNote 5/2012. Qualitative Analysis of Coconut Water Products using Stir Bar Sorptive Extraction Combined with Thermal Desorption-GC/MS KEYWORDS

2-Step Multi-Volatile Method (2-Step MVM) for Characterization of Aroma Compounds in Bread

AppNote 9/2000. Flavor Profi ling of Different Olive Oils with Rancidity-Monitoring by Thermal Extraction GC/MS KEY WORDS ABSTRACT

using the Agilent 7696A Sample Prep

Headspace Gas Chromatography to Quantitate and Identify Volatiles in Liquids

CORESTA Recommended Method No. 84

2.1 Determination of Ethanol (Ethyl Alcohol)

Headspace Gas Chromatography to Quantitate and Identify Volatiles in Liquids

Headspace Gas Chromatography to Quantitate and Identify Volatiles in Liquids

Analysis of Organic Acids and Alcohols Using the Agilent J&W DB-624UI Ultra Inert GC Column

AppNote 1/1995. Quantification of 4-Heptanone in Urine by Headspace GC-MS Analysis Using a Multipurpose Sampler

Rapid Analysis of 37 FAMEs with the Agilent 8860 Gas Chromatograph

Automated Sample Preparation for Profiling Fatty Acids in Blood and Plasma using the Agilent 7693 ALS

AppNote 5/2013. Thermochemolysis A Simple and Rapid Methylation Method Based on TMAH for Gas Chromatographic Analysis of Linseed Oil and Amber

Determination of Bath Salts (Pyrovalerone Analogs) in Biological Samples

Analysis of Omega 3 and Omega 6 FAMEs in Fish Oil and Animal Fat Using an Agilent J&W DB-FATWAX Ultra Inert GC Column

Rapid Separation of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters

Independent Column Temperature Control Using an LTM Oven Module for Improved Multidimensional Separation of Chiral Compounds

HUMAN LIVER SLICE EXPERIMENT 1 Effects of Propylene Glycol on Ethylene Glycol Metabolism

LC-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Tenofovir from Plasma

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF THE GC METHOD FOR THE QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF SEMI-VOLATILE SOLVENTS IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL SUBSTANCE BOSENTAN

Determination of Gamma-Hydroxy-Butyrate (GHB) in Biological Samples

Amphetamines, Phentermine, and Designer Stimulant Quantitation Using an Agilent 6430 LC/MS/MS

Rapid and sensitive UHPLC screening of additives in carbonated beverages with a robust organic acid column

A comparison study of the analysis of volatile organic acids and fatty acids

Agilent 1260 Infinity Analytical SFC System

Automated Sample Preparation for FAME Analysis in Edible Oils Using an Agilent 7696A Sample Prep WorkBench

Analytical Method Development for USP Related Compounds in Paclitaxel Using an Agilent Poroshell 120 PFP

Liquid Liquid Extraction of Gamma Hydroxybutyric Acid (GHB) in Blood and Urine for GC-MS analysis

AppNote 11/2006. Performance Evaluation of a Thermal Desorption System for Detection of Basic Drugs in Forensic Samples by GC/MS KEYWORDS ABSTRACT

Highly Repeatable Ultra Low Detection of Estradiol Using Triple Quadrupole GC/MS in NCI Mode

High-Throughput Quantitative LC-MS/MS Analysis of 6 Opiates and 14 Benzodiazepines in Urine

AppNote 3/1993. Identification of Fatty Acid Methyl Esters as Minor Components in Fish Oil by Multidimensional GC-MSD: New Furan Fatty Acids

Interested in conducting your own webinar?

AppNote 6/1994. Identification of Furan Fatty Acids in Nutritional Oils and Fats by Multidimensional

Fig.1. Denatonium benzoate (DB) chemical structure

Rapid and sensitive UHPLC screening for water soluble vitamins in sports beverages

Rapid and Robust Detection of THC and Its Metabolites in Blood

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD NÄ 9

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

E17 ETHYLCELLULOSE. Revision 3 Stage 4

High-Throughput, Cost-Efficient LC-MS/MS Forensic Method for Measuring Buprenorphine and Norbuprenorphine in Urine

AS Application Note 1602

Development and Validation of a Simultaneous HPLC Method for Quantification of Amlodipine Besylate and Metoprolol Tartrate in Tablets

Determination of red blood cell fatty acid profiles in clinical research

Doubling the throughput of long chromatographic methods by using a novel Dual LC workflow

Possibility of Use a Saliva for Determination Ethanol and Opiates

Available online at Scholars Research Library

Application Note. Small Molecule Pharmaceuticals. 2-Ethyl-2-phenylmalonamide Ethosuximide Primidone Carbamazepine. Carbamazepine-

CORESTA Recommended Method No. 78

CORESTA RECOMMENDED METHOD N 8

Lipidomic Analysis by UPLC-QTOF MS

PAPRIKA EXTRACT SYNONYMS DEFINITION DESCRIPTION FUNCTIONAL USES CHARACTERISTICS

CHAPTER INTRODUCTION OF DOSAGE FORM AND LITERATURE REVIEW

Journal of Chemical and Pharmaceutical Research

[ APPLICATION NOTE ] Profiling Mono and Disaccharides in Milk and Infant Formula Using the ACQUITY Arc System and ACQUITY QDa Detector

Analysis of Cannabinoids in Cannabis by UHPLC Using PDA Detection

Rapid Analysis of Water-Soluble Vitamins in Infant Formula by Standard-Addition

autosamplers ASI-100 and ASI-100T Autosamplers

Lutein Esters from Tagetes Erecta

Chromatography Vacuum Ultraviolet Spectroscopy

METHOD 8316 ACRYLAMIDE, ACRYLONITRILE AND ACROLEIN BY HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY (HPLC)

SPE-LC-MS/MS Method for the Determination of Nicotine, Cotinine, and Trans-3-hydroxycotinine in Urine

The next level of True Blue Performance

Gas Chromatography Syringe Selection Guide

A Robustness Study for the Agilent 6470 LC-MS/MS Mass Spectrometer

ASSAY AND IMPURITY METHOD FOR DURACOR TABLETS BY HPLC

Application Note. Agilent Application Solution Analysis of ascorbic acid, citric acid and benzoic acid in orange juice. Author. Abstract.

Title Revision n date

Comparison of PAL SPME Fibers with established Fibers

The Investigation of Factors Contributing to Immunosuppressant Drugs Response Variability in LC-MS/MS Analysis

Determination of β2-agonists in Pork Using Agilent SampliQ SCX Solid-Phase Extraction Cartridges and Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometry

DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION OF GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY METHODS FOR THE CONTROL OF VOLATILE IMPURITIES IN THE PHARMACEUTICAL SUBSTANCE DUTASTERIDE

Quantitative Analysis of -Hydroxybutyrate in Hair Using Target Analyte Finding Processing of Comprehensive GC-HRT Data

Mass-Based Purification of Natural Product Impurities Using an Agilent 1260 Infinity II Preparative LC/MSD System

Sanjog Ramdharane 1, Dr. Vinay Gaitonde 2

PROPOSAL FOR REVISION OF MONOGRAPH PUBLISHED IN The International Pharmacopoeia: REVISION OF ph test ABACAVIR ORAL SOLUTION (JULY 2012)

A Novel Solution for Vitamin K₁ and K₂ Analysis in Human Plasma by LC-MS/MS

Fast determination of residual glycerol and glycerides in biodiesel by SFC/MS using the Agilent 1260 Infinity Analytical SFC System

Qualitative and quantitative determination of phenolic antioxidant compounds in red wine and fruit juice with the Agilent 1290 Infinity 2D-LC Solution

Transcription:

AppNote 1/2005 Blood Alcohol Analysis Using an Automated Static Headspace Method Vanessa R. Kinton, Edward A. Pfannkoch, and Jacqueline A. Whitecavage Gerstel, Inc., 701 Digital Drive, Suite J, Linthicum, MD 21090, USA ABSTRACT Forensic laboratories face the need to analyze many samples of human blood and body fluids for alcohol content. The large number of samples that require quantification of ethanol in these facilities creates a challenge for the methodology employed. Factors that need to be considered are sample throughput, resolution, and carryover. A successful method for these analyses should be fast, precise, and accurate. Current methods used in these analyses use a gas chromatograph coupled to a static headspace sampler and flame ionization detector (FID). The x, y, z robotic autosampler used in this study has a capacity of up to 128 headspace samples, which is a distinct advantage compared to other samplers commercially available. Results obtained with the instrument and methodology described in this report meet the specifications set by the California Department of Justice Blood Alcohol Operating Procedures (Title 17). A dual-column, dual-fid blood alcohol analysis system that can be used for confirmation of ethanol peaks was also tested and produced results with good precision (below 5 % RSD).

INTRODUCTION Headspace gas chromatography (HS-GC) for determination of ethanol content of blood is widely used by forensic labs to test automobile drivers charged with DUI (driving under the influence). The method originates from 1964 when G. Machata [1] published the first use of HS-GC for quantitative analysis. The method includes the use of an internal standard (IS) compound. Tert-butanol or n-propanol may be used as internal standards for the alcohol in blood determinations. The choice of which internal standard to use depends on the type of column utilized in the GC instrument. Blood is a very complex matrix that varies depending on the individual. The salt or lipid content may be different and headspace analysis with the use of an IS provides fast measurements that can be automated. In this study, a GERSTEL MPS 2 robotic autosampler with a headspace gas-tight syringe was used to analyze ethanol solutions in different concentrations. In this study, we developed a method that meets the specifications set by the California Department of Justice Blood Alcohol Operating Procedures (Title 17) [2]. We also configured and tested a separate dual-column/dual-fid system that adds confirmation because of the different elution order of ethanol on each column. EXPERIMENTAL Instrumentation Analyses were performed on a 6890 GC equipped with single or dual FID s (Agilent Technologies), and a GERSTEL MPS 2 multipurpose sampler configured for static headspace injection. Reagents - Ethyl alcohol, absolute, 200 proof, 99.5%, A.C.S. reagent grade - Methyl alcohol, 99.8%, A.C.S. reagent grade - Acetone 99.5%, A.C.S. reagent grade - n-propanol (1-propanol) 99.5% A.C.S. reagent grade (IS) - Isopropanol (2-propanol), 99.5%, A.C.S. reagent grade - Blood alcohol mix resolution control standard (Restek, # 36256). 0.100 g/dl in water of 8 compounds: acetaldehyde, acetone, acetonitrile, ethanol, ethyl acetate, isopropanol, methanol and methyl ethyl ketone (MEK). Preparation of standards Secondary standard (SS). 0.25 ml of absolute (200 proof) ethanol and 0.125 ml of n-propanol pipetted into a 100mL volumetric flask and diluted with bottled water. Quality control standard (QC). 0.15 ml of absolute (200 proof) ethanol and 0.125 ml of n-propanol pipetted into a 100 ml volumetric flask and diluted with bottled water. Resolution standard (RS). 0.25 ml of absolute (200 proof) ethanol, 0.1 ml methanol, 0.1 ml isopropanol, 0.01 ml acetone and 0.125 ml n-propanol pipetted into a 100 ml volumetric flask and diluted with bottled water. Blank standard. 0.125 ml of n-propanol pipetted into a 100 ml volumetric flask and diluted with bottled water. All standards above were diluted 1:6 in bottled water prior to use. 500 μl of standard was then pipetted into a 20 ml headspace vial. 1 ml of 1000 μg/ml internal standard (n-propanol) and 1mL of the blood alcohol mix resolution control standard (Restek, # 36256, Lot# A034323) was diluted in 18 ml bottled water. 4 ml of standard was then pipetted into a 20 ml headspace vial. All vials were crimp-capped using blue silicone/ptfe septa. Calculations (AUE x AIK x CKE) CO = (AIU x AKE) (AIK x CKE) K = AKE Where: K = response factor CO = concentration of ethanol in the unknown sample AUE = peak area of ethanol peak in unknown sample AIK = peak area of internal standard peak in calibration standard CKE = concentration of ethanol in secondary alcohol standard AIU = peak area of internal standard peak in unknown sample AKE = peak area of secondary alcohol standard or AUE x K CO = AIU AN/2005/01-2

Quality control criteria for California compliance - Calibration runs consist of 6 secondary standards followed by a resolution standard. The calibration constant K is then calculated for each of the 6 secondary standards and the mean is calculated. The value of the K constant for each of the six determinations must fall within ± 1.5 % of the mean value. - The results for the resolution standard shall indicate a resolution of 0.01% acetone in the presence of 0.20% ethanol. - Analysis runs consist of a Blank (water, no IS) and standards (SS, QC and RS) followed by the sample set (2 replicas per sample) followed by two additional standards (QC and SS). - The result of the blank sample should be less than 0.01%. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION California DOJ Blood Alcohol Operating Procedure (Title 17). Figure 1 shows the instrument used in this study. It consists of a GERSTEL MPS 2 autosampler that can be programmed to be used with headspace syringes. For this study we used a 2.5 ml syringe that can also be programmed to inject different volumes (recommended volumes from 0.25 ml up to 2.5 ml). The headspace syringe adaptor is heated and can be controlled to optimize the syringe temperature. always up to six samples incubating. This results in great time savings and excellent sample throughput. For this analysis we selected an incubation temperature of 65 ºC and a syringe temperature of 70 ºC. It is recommended to use a slightly higher syringe temperature as the sample is transferred from the vial to the syringe to avoid condensation. Secondary and resolution standards were analyzed. An example chromatogram is displayed in Figure 2. It can be seen that there is no ethanol carryover in the blank and the IS reproduces well. Using the gas chromatograph in the isothermal mode, we were able to separate the alcohols present in the SS and also the compounds present in the resolution standard in approximately 3.5 minutes (Figure 3). The updated chromatographic conditions include the use of a capillary GC column instead of the packed column currently used for these analyses in California. 500000 300000 100000 Secondary Standard Resolution Standard Blank/Internal Standard Methanol Acetone Isopropanol n-propanol Time--> 1.00 2.00 3.00 Figure 2. FID overlay of Blank/Internal Standard (IS), Resolution Standard and Secondary Standard (SS) for California Compliance. 1 1000000 800000 Isopropanol n-propanol (IS) Methanol Acetone Figure 1. MPS 2 Headspace autosampler coupled to a 6890 Agilent GC. Incubation of the samples is carried out in a heated agitator with six sample positions. GERSTEL MASter software will prep-ahead samples if equilibration times are longer than GC analysis times so there are Time--> 1.00 2.00 3.00 Figure 3. FID trace of Resolution Standard for California Compliance. AN/2005/01-3

In order to test the robustness of the method, 48 calibration sequences were run with the MPS 2 over a three month period using the parameters listed in Table 1. Using the K factor criteria all 48 sequences passed. Perturbations of the system during this 3 month period include changing the GC column, changing the syringe, and two power outages. An example of the K factor check is shown in Table 2. To test the accuracy of the method, reference samples with known alcohol concentrations were prepared; the alcohol content was calculated and found to be accurate. Table 1. Method parameters for California compliance. Agilent 6890 Inlet: Split/splitless, 100 C Split 1:5 Column: 30m DB-ALC2 (Agilent) d i = 0.53mm, d f = 2.0μm Oven: isothermal, 40 C MPS 2 Headspace Incubation: 65 C (15 min) Syringe: 2.5 ml, 70 C Injection: 1 ml (500 μl/s) Table 2. Example of calculation and check of K factor. EtOH n-propanol (IS) File name Peak Area Peak Area K factor -1.5% / +1.5% 7230002 113206882 106875141 0.1794 Pass / Pass 7230003 116621856 109083941 0.1777 Pass / Pass 7230004 114897369 107497317 0.1778 Pass / Pass 7230005 111194673 104605854 0.1787 Pass / Pass 7230006 115948256 109036988 0.1787 Pass / Pass 7230007 114896941 107920646 0.1785 Pass / Pass Average 114460996 107503314 0.1785 0.176 / 0.181 StD 1975014 1662204 0.0006 % RSD 1.73 1.55 Blood Alcohol Dual-Column Confi rmation Method. We configured a system with dual complimentary alcohol columns from a single inlet and dual FIDs for blood alcohol analysis [3]. The dual system has an advantage since the order of elution is different on each column and therefore it adds confirmation of the peak identification. In order to verify the precision of the splitter (Figure 4) we installed two identical columns and checked the response of the secondary standard on both columns. FID 2 Inlet Splitter FID 1 Column 2 Column 1 Figure 4. Dual-column dual-fid system used in the study. AN/2005/01-4

Figure 5 shows that both retention time and peak area reproduce well and therefore the splitter appears to split the sample uniformly between the two columns. We tested 6 sequences; each sequence consisted of 1 blank, 6 SS and another blank. Using the K factor criteria all 6 sequences passed on both columns. Time--> DB-ALC2 column 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 IS IS A B Once we were satisfied with the system performance, we used two columns with two different stationary phases. Using the parameters listed in Table 3 we analyzed the Restek resolution control standard. Figure 6 shows the chromatogram obtained for the resolution mix plus IS. Table 3. Method parameters for dual-column dual-fid system. Agilent 6890 Inlet: Split/splitless, 150 C Split 1:5 Column: 30m DB-ALC1 (Agilent) d i = 0.32mm, d f = 1.8μm Column: 30m DB-ALC2 (Agilent) d i = 0.32mm, d f = 1.2μm Oven: isothermal, 35 C Time--> DB-ALC2 column 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 Figure 5. Dual-FID traces of Secondary Standard (SS) using two identical columns DB-ALC 2. DB-ALC1 column Methanol Acetaldehyde 6.00 Isopropanol Acetone / Acetonitrile MPS 2 Headspace Incubation: 65 C (15 min) Syringe: 2.5 ml, 70 C Injection: 1 ml (500 μl/s) n-propanol (IS) MEK Ethyl acetate A Time--> 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 DB-ALC2 column Acetaldehyde Methanol Acetone Isopropanol Acetonitrile n-propanol (IS) Ethyl acetate MEK B Time--> 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 Figure 5. Dual-FID traces of Restek (#36256) Resolution Control Standard and Internal Standard (IS). AN/2005/01-5

Precision for 12 replicas of this analysis are listed in Table 4. [Note: while analyzing the resolution standard we found a late-eluting breakdown product of acetaldehyde. If acetaldehyde is included in a standard, we recommend watching for a late eluting carryover peak and if necessary, extending the isothermal run to approximately 20 min to check for the presence of the breakdown product. Table 4. Precision of 12 replicas using dual-column configuration. Average peak area Standard deviation RSD [%] Compound ALC1 ALC2 ALC1 ALC2 ALC1 ALC2 Methanol 2321294 2628655 81681 93324 3.52 3.55 Acetaldehyde 12326272 13373526 534287 578415 4.33 4.33 4958271 5519370 180264 202302 3.64 3.67 Isopropanol 9719454 10594110 379814 418120 3.91 3.95 Acetone 31021477* 21991434 1350778* 962275 4.35* 4.38 Acetonitrile 11314551 481138 4.25 n-propanol 9320684 9919804 344806 370832 3.70 3.74 MEK 39378050 42850828 1711203 1844065 4.35 4.30 Ethyl acetate 52394805 55868378 1904410 2026058 3.63 3.63 CONCLUSIONS - The GERSTEL MPS 2 robotic autosampler is capable of delivering performance for blood alcohol analysis that meets or exceeds the California Title 17 Forensic Alcohol Analysis and Breath Alcohol Analysis performance criteria. - Testing during a 3-month period showed good robustness and reproducibility. - This instrumentation provides increased sample throughput by accommodating up to 128 samples and by using the prep ahead function to equilibrate samples. - The GERSTEL MPS 2 autosampler also performed well when used with a dual column blood alcohol confirmation method. REFERENCES [1] Machata, G. Mikrochim Acta, 1964, 262-271. [2] California Code of Regulations Title 17, Division 1, Chapter 2, Subchapter 1, Group 8 Forensic Alcohol Analysis and Breath Alcohol Analysis. [3] Firor, R.L., Meng, C-K, and Bergna, M., Agilent Technologies Application (publication number 5989-0959EN). AN/2005/01-6 For research use only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures. The information provided for this product is intended for reference and research purposes only. GERSTEL offers no guarantee as to the quality and suitability of this data for your specific application. Information, descriptions and specifications in this publication are subject to change without notice.

AN/2005/01-7

GERSTEL GmbH & Co. KG Eberhard-Gerstel-Platz 1 45473 Mülheim an der Ruhr Germany +49 (0) 208-7 65 03-0 +49 (0) 208-7 65 03 33 gerstel@gerstel.com www.gerstel.com GERSTEL Worldwide GERSTEL, Inc. 701 Digital Drive, Suite J Linthicum, MD 21090 USA +1 (410) 247 5885 +1 (410) 247 5887 sales@gerstelus.com www.gerstelus.com GERSTEL AG Wassergrabe 27 CH-6210 Sursee Switzerland +41 (41) 9 21 97 23 gerstelag@ch.gerstel.com www.gerstel.ch GERSTEL K.K. 1-3-1 Nakane, Meguro-ku Tokyo 152-0031 SMBC Toritsudai Ekimae Bldg 4F Japan +81 3 5731 5321 +81 3 5731 5322 info@gerstel.co.jp www.gerstel.co.jp GERSTEL LLP Level 25, North Tower One Raffles Quay Singapore 048583 +65 6622 5486 +65 6622 5999 SEA@gerstel.com www.gerstel.com GERSTEL Brasil Av. Pascoal da Rocha Falcão, 367 04785-000 São Paulo - SP Brasil +55 (11)5665-8931 +55 (11)5666-9084 gerstel-brasil@gerstel.com www.gerstel.com.br Information, descriptions and specifications in this Publication are subject to change without notice. GERSTEL, GRAPHPACK and TWISTER are registered trademarks of GERSTEL GmbH & Co. KG. Copyright by GERSTEL GmbH & Co. KG Awarded for the active pursuit of environmental sustainability