Sites of Atherosclerosis In order of Frequency

Similar documents
Left main coronary artery (LMCA): The proximal segment

Catch-up Phenomenon: Insights from Pathology

Pathology of Vulnerable Plaque Angioplasty Summit 2005 TCT Asia Pacific, Seoul, April 28-30, 2005

How DCB drug dose effects vessel healing. Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD. USA

Optical Coherence Tomography for Intracoronary Imaging

Drug Eluting Stent DES Pathology Update What we know, what we do not know

2yrs 2-6yrs >6yrs BMS 0% 22% 42% DES 29% 41% Nakazawa et al. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;57:

CLINICAL APPLICATIONS OF OPTICAL COHERENCE TOMOGRAPHY. Konstantina P. Bouki, FESC 2 nd Department of Cardiology General Hospital Of Nikea, Pireaus

as a Mechanism of Stent Failure

IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. K.Boerlage-van Dijk CarVasZ 2014

Drug delivery to the vessel wall: Coated balloons and the role of the excipient

Can IVUS Define Plaque Features that Impact Patient Care?

Pathology of Cardiovascular Interventions. Body and Disease 2011

Review Article Pathologic Etiologies of Late and Very Late Stent Thrombosis following First-Generation Drug-Eluting Stent Placement

Which Stent Is Best for Various Femoropopliteal Anatomy? 2018 Pacific Northwest Endovascular Conference June 15-26, 2018 Seattle, WA

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

In-stent Restenosis: the Achille's Heel of SFA Stenting

Utility of Image-Guided Atherectomy for Optimal Treatment of Ambiguous Lesions by Angiography

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

The Latest Experimental Results of Endothelialization with BuMA stent. Renu Virmani, MD CVPath Institute, Inc. Gaithersburg, Maryland, USA

Clinically proven. ordering info. Vascular Intervention // Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System/0.018 /OTW. Pulsar-18

Dr Rodney Itaki Lecturer Anatomical Pathology Discipline. University of Papua New Guinea School of Medicine & Health Sciences Division of Pathology

Superficial Femoral Artery Intervention: The gift that keeps on giving! Wm. Britton Eaves,MD WKHSC Bossier City, LA

4/14/2016. Faculty Disclosure. Drug-eluting technology in the SFA and Popliteal. Typical SFA Disease Pattern. Why Peripheral Artery Disease Matters

Efficacy of DEB in Calcification and Subintimal Angioplasty

Lessons learnt from DES in the SFA is there any ideal concept so far?

Drug eluting stents and balloons in peripheral arterial disease A.T.O. ABDOOL-CARRIM UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

SFA lesion treatment: China experience. Wei Liang, MD

Non stent based intracoronary drug delivery

Blood Vessels. Dr. Nabila Hamdi MD, PhD

New Data to Shape the Era of Drug Elution in Peripheral Interventions

Pathology of Coronary Artery Disease

2-YEAR DATA SUPERA POPLITEAL REAL WORLD

OCT Findings: Lesson from Stable vs Unstable Plaques

The role of bioabsorbable stents in the superficial femoral artery What is going on? Frank Vermassen Ghent University Hospital Belgium

What Coronary Specialists Teach The Vascular Community About Vessel Prep? Tony Das, MD Texas Health, Dallas Dallas, Texas

Intervention for Lower Extremity PAD: When, why and what?! Robert F Cuff, MD FACS RVT RPVI

Pattern of calcification: intimal vs. medial, and difference below and above the knee. Aloke Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD.

Atherectomy: Jetstream and Directional. George S. Chrysant, M.D.

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

Pathology of Second-Generation Everolimus-Eluting Stents Versus First-Generation Sirolimus- and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents in Humans

Current Status and Limitations in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

Intravascular Imaging Insights into the Mechanism of Action of Focal Force Balloon Angioplasty

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

Lessons & Perspectives: What is the role of Cryoplasty in SFA Intervention?

Vulnerable Plaque Pathophysiology, Detection, and Intervention. VP: A Local Problem or Systemic Disease. Erling Falk, Denmark

Comparison of particulate embolization in different DCB formulations. Aloke V. Finn, MD CVPath Institute Inc. Gaithersburg, MD.

OCT; Comparative Imaging Results with IVUS, VH and Angioscopy

DISRUPT PAD. (( Data Summary )) DISRUPT PAD Data Summary SPL Rev. B 2016 Shockwave Medical Inc. All rights reserved.

CLI Treatment Using Long and Scoring Balloons

Bifurcation Stenting: IVUS and OCT Information

Pathology of percutaneous interventions (PCI) in coronary arteries. Allard van der Wal, MD.PhD; Pathologie AMC, Amsterdam, NL

Next Generation Drug- eluting Stent : Will It Solve the Problem?

PERFORMANCE YOU CAN TRUST. EverFlex Self-expanding Peripheral Stent with Entrust Delivery System

PCI for Ostial Lesion

DEB experience in Gachon Universtiy Gil Hospital (in ISR) Soon Yong Suh MD., PhD. Heart Center Gachon University Gil Hospital Seoul, Korea.

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

TOBA Trial 12 months Results

Technical Characteristics of coronary prostheses(stents)

Imaging Atheroma The quest for the Vulnerable Plaque

Insights in Thrombosis and In-Stent Restenosis

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

Peripheral Vascular Disease Patient Awareness

Stents selection and optimal implantation: sizes, design, deployment Abbott Vascular. All rights reserved.

Analysis of macrophage accumulation using optical coherence tomography one year after sirolimus, paclitaxel and zotarolimus-eluting stent

Drug eluting devices: Why paclitaxel works above the knee and sirolimus below the knee, is the stent or the drug?

Smooth muscle pharmacology & interventional cardiology

Imaging Overview for Vulnerable Plaque: Data from IVUS Trial and An Introduction to VH-IVUS Imgaging

Medical therapy after angioplasty / stenting

Comparison Of Primary Long Stenting Versus Primary Short Stenting For Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease (PARADE)

Introduction 3. What is Peripheral Vascular Disease? 5. What Are Some of the Symptoms of Peripheral Vascular Disease? 6

Interventional Radiology in Peripheral Vascular Disease: How Far Can We Go? Dr. L. F. CHENG Department of Radiology Princess Margaret Hospital

Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Practical Approach

Biology of in-stent restenosis and rational for debulking

Atherectomy with thrombectomy of. Rotarex S : The Leipzig experience

Pathology of the Vulnerable Plaque

MULTIVESSEL PCI. IN DRUG-ELUTING STENT RESTENOSIS DUE TO STENT FRACTURE, TREATED WITH REPEAT DES IMPLANTATION

Accurate Vessel Sizing Drives Clinical Results. IVUS In the Periphery

Merits and demerits of DES, DEB or covered stent in lower extremity arterial occlusive disease 성균관의과대학삼성서울병원순환기내과최승혁

FLEXIBLE, BALOON EXPANDABLE

CHALLENGES IN FEMORO-POPLITEAL STENTING

Assessment of Vulnerable Plaque by IVUS and VH-IVUS

Management of In-stent Restenosis after Lower Extremity Endovascular Procedures

Calcium Removal and Plaque Modification in the Era of DEB and Contemporary Stenting for Femoro- Popliteal Disease

IVUS Guided Case Review Case Performed by Frank R. Arko III, MD Charlotte, NC

Vascular V12. Covered Stent. The New Standard of Care

Bioabsorbable stents: early clinical results. Dr Angela Hoye MB ChB, PhD Senior Lecturer in Cardiology Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals

Minimizing Burden, the effect of thin strut and low Chronic Outward Force SE stents

Could a combination of DCB + stent be the answer in complex SFA lesions

The Lutonix BTK Clinical Trial Programme: Status Update and Real World Clinical Experience

Robert W. Fincher, DO The Ritz-Carlton, Dove Mountain Marana, Arizona February 7th, 2015

DCB + BMS is not a DES

5-YEAR SUPERIOR RESULTS. Compared to PTA and Zilver BMS 1. NOW WITH 140 mm LENGTH STENTS

The femoropopliteal (FP) artery refers to the composite

Brachytherapy for In-Stent Restenosis: Is the Concept Still Alive? Matthew T. Menard, M.D. Brigham and Women s Hospital Boston, Massachussetts

Excimer Laser angioplasty for femoro-popliteal disease. Sendai Kousei Hospital, Tokyo Kamata Hospital Naoto Inoue MD, FSCAI, FJCC, FAHA

Drug Eluting Stents Sometimes Fail ESC Stockholm 29 Set 2010 Stent Thrombosis Alaide Chieffo

Neointimal coverage of bare-metal and sirolimuseluting stents evaluated with optical coherence tomography

The Pathology of Neoatherosclerosis in Human Coronary Implants

Introduction What Causes Peripheral Vascular Disease? How Do Doctors Treat Peripheral Vascular Disease?... 9

Transcription:

Pathological Features of Peripheral Atherosclerosis: Implication for Device Development G Nakazawa Tokai Univ. Kanagawa, Japan 1

Sites of Atherosclerosis In order of Frequency carotid (3) (3) Coronary (2) (1) (1) (4) (4) (5)

Gender Age and Atherosclerosis Atherosclerosis in the large arteries was semi quantitatively scored on a scale of 0 8 according to the ratio of the atheroma occupied area to the entire surface area: negligible (0 point, ratio = 0 1/20), minimal (2 points, 1/20 1/6), mild (4 points, 1/6 1/3), moderate (6 points, 1/3 2/3), and severe (8 points, 2/3 1) where as for coronary arteries it was based on stenosis. Sawabe M, et al. Atherosclerosis 2006:186:374 379

Histological examples Coronary vs. Femoral A, B, C, and D are Coronary plaques and E and F are Femoral arteries Dalager, S. et al. Stroke 2007;38:2698 2705

Percentage distribution of AHA lesion types inthe different arteries stratified by age decade Dalager, S. et al. Stroke 2007;38:2698-2705

Eccentric Fibrous plaque

Early phase of atherosclerosis in different types of artery: Pathologic Intimal Thickening A LP C Mac LP LP

Eccentric Fibrous Plaque with Calcified Necrotic Core Ca 2+ Calcified necrotic core

Eccentric Plaque with Large lipid Core and Thin Cap Fibroatheroma in 3 different beds

Chronic Total Occlusion B C

Plaque Rupture A FC B Ulceration NC NC C Ca ++ Th NC NC

Plaque Erosion B Th Th C Th Th LP

Eruptive and Non-Eruptive Nodular Calcification A B CN CN CN Th C CN

Calcification in Lower Extremity Artery Ca ++ Ca ++ I M Freque ency Distrib bution 50 45 40 ++ 35 Ca 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 0 1+ 2+ 3+ 4+ Calcium Score

Monckeberg s Medial Calcification from Symptomatic PVD Patients Requiring Ampuatation A Ca ++ B

Differences and Similarities Between Coronary and Peripheral latherosclerosis The stages of atherosclerosis described in the coronary, carotid and aortic disease are also applicable in the peripheral arteries Peripheral arteries have a high frequency of Mönckeberg s medial calcification, a feature not present in coronary or carotid artery disease Lipid cores in femoral arteries are not as large as those in the coronary or carotid disease

Limitations of Current Technology for the treatment of PAD

Restenosis Rates after Percutaneous Interventions Artery Restenosis at 6-12 months Coronary BMS 18-30 % DES 0-10 % Carotid Iliac Balloon angioplasty BMS SFA, Poplitial BMS DES 5-8 % (BMS) 6-41 % 3-32 % 8-44 % 0-10 % (23% at 2 years) Below the knee BMS 21-79 % DES 4-37 (SES), 77 (PES) % Modified from Deiter RS, and Laird JR. Endovascular Today 2004

45 yrs WF with Left Lft common iliac artery stent placement 25 2.5 yrs before death Medial injury Abd Ao RIA LIA Thrombus th Organized thrombus Bone formation

Lower Extremity Artery Stenting Procedure Long lesion (require overlapping stent) Under expansion or incomplete apposition due to calcification c Results Enhanced ddl delayed dhealing High incidence of restenosis or re occlusion

Biomechanical forces in the femoropopliteal stenting Hip flexion/knee bending (degree) 0/0 70/20 90/90 Walking Stair climbing Smouse, HB. et al Endovascular Today, June 2005

Stent fracture and Restenosis in SFA and popliteal p arteries Fracture ( ) N=71 Fracture (+) N=22 Patency at 12 months 41.1 % vs. 84.3% nitinol stent Mean;13.6 months Exercise habit (+) (walk >5000 steps / day) Scheinert, D et al, JACC 2005 Iida, O et al, AJC 2006

EES implanted in LOM, 6 months Proximal 51 year old male, complained of shortness of breath then became unresponsive. Distal

New Strategies for the Treatment of Atherosclerosis Drug Eluting Balloon has no metal struts that may cause continuous stimulation to the vessel and lead to sustained inflammation. has potential ability to evenly deliver the drug to the vessel wall. However, the best pharmacokinetics and the best formulation of DEB remain unknown. acute or subacute recoil may occur and dampen its efficacy especially in highly calcified arteries. Self expanding DES causes less injury and less inflammation on the vessel at the time of deployment. is flexible, and has a lasting resistance to the fracture that is associated with stent failure. maintains the radial force and prevents the occurrence of recoil in longterm. However, the advantage above will be dampened in the presence of heavy calcification as frequently observed in peripheral arteries.

(ng/mg) 3000 2000 1000 PTX only Drug deliver of DEB Tissue Concentration PTX + Iopromide (SeQuent) (ng/ml) 4000 3000 2000 1000 Blood Concentration 5 min 30 min 1 hr 3 hrs 24 hrs 3346.7 11.0 6.2 2.4 0.4 712.8 76 7.6 51 5.1 34 3.4 18 1.8 0 0 1 hr 24 hrs 72 hrs 5 min 30 min 1 hr 3 hrs 24hrs Non atherosclerotic ti Rabbit Iliac Model 28 days POBA PTX only PTX+Iopromide

(%) Vascular Response to DEB At 28 days following treatment in Rabbit Iliac model POBA PTX only PTX + Iopromide (SeQuent) %Stenosis (mm) Neoint THK Media SMC Loss P=0.037 P=0.055 P=0.044 35 0.1 5 30 25 20 15 10 5 0.075 0.05 0.025 4 3 2 1 0 1.6 0 0 Fibrin/Platelets Intima Media Inf Endothelial Loss P=0.39 1.6 1.6 P=0.52 P=0.030 12 1.2 12 1.2 12 1.2 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.4 0.4 0.4 0 0 0

Dose dependent Changes in Iliofemoral Arteries Following SeQuent DEB treatment at 14 days Controls 1X Inflation 4X Inflations 6X Inflations X6 inflations

Fibrinoid Necrosis Downstream vascular change following DEB treatmentt t At 7 days Vascular Changes in the Coronary Band of the Hoof REPEAT TREATMENT Platelet emboli Fibrin Thrombus with Crystalline material

Stable Neointima formation in Access BA9 (Devax) and late catch up of Neointimal Formation in Cypher stents Axxess BA9 30 Days 90 Days 180 Days 365 Days Cypher 30 Days 90 Days 180 Days 365 Days

Percent Stenosis and Injury in Axxess BA9 Self-Expanding Stent v. Cypher nosis cent Sten Perc 80 p = 0.20 p = 0.63 p = 0.02 p = 0.27 70 Axxess BA9 Cypher 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Axxess BA9 Cypher 30 Days 90 Days 180 Days 365 Days Injury score 0.039±0.029 0.60±0.68 0.080±0.097 0.31±0.43 0.44±0.35 1.53±0.94 1.68±1.10 1.59±0.84 p= 0.007007 p= 0.003003 p= 0.005005 p= 0.006006 30 days 90 days 180 days 365 days

Speculative Differences Between DEB and Self expandingdes expanding vs. balloonexpandabledes Injury & acute inflammation at PCI Balloon expandable DES Drug eluting Balloon Self expanding DES 3 to 4+ 3 to 4+ 1 to 2+ (w/o post dilatation) Drug deliverability 3to 4+ 1 to 3+ 3 to 4+ (depend on solvent) (even distribution) Resistance to Recoil 3 to 4+ 0 >5+ Reaction to polymer 2 to 3+ 0 2 to 3+ Metal struts stimuli 2to 3+ 0 3 to 4+ Neointimal Growth 1to 2+ 2 to 3+ (incomplete drug distribution) Late luminal narrowing (restenosis) 2 to 3+ (fracture /late catch up) 3 to 4+ (acute late recoil and late catch up) 1 to 2+ 1 to 2+ (continuous expansion) Uncovered strut 2 to 3+ 0 1 to 2+ (w/o post dilation) Endothelial recovery Delayed Faster Delayed (> 1 year) (6 to 9 months) (> 1year) Risk of Late thrombosis 2 to 3+ 0 to 1+ 1 to 2+ (larger luminal area)

Summary New technologies such as drug eluting balloon (DEB) and self expanding DES has potential advantages that will complement the limitation of current DES technology. However, the improvement of DEB is still required to achieve better drug distribution and to prevent distal emboli. The sustained radial force of self expanding DES overcomes the late catch up phenomenon of balloon expandable DES, however, the superiority will be diminished in the presence of heavy calcification. The innovation of biomaterial i is further needed. dd

Acknowledgements CVPath Institute, Inc. Renu Virmani Frank Kolodgie Masataka Nakano Fumiyuki Otsuka 33