What s New? Example 2 Employee B. Example 1 - Employee A

Similar documents
HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

HEARING CONSERVATION PROCEDURE

CCS Administrative Procedure H Hearing Conservation

11. Hearing Conservation Program Chapter , WAC

Hearing Conservation Program April 27, 2018

Hearing Conservation Plan

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Effective Date: 27-February Table of Contents

Model Safety Program

Hearing Conservation Program Regulations and Recommendations Summary

Procedure Number 310 TVA Safety Procedure Page 1 of 6 Hearing Conservation Revision 0 January 6, 2003

Hearing Conservation Program Table of Contents

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Plan

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

Rutgers Environmental Health and Safety (REHS)

Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual

Hearing Conservation

Craven Community College HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Santa Clarita Community College District HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Revised

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program

SOUTHERN UTAH UNIVERSITY S WRITTEN HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM December 2017

BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE OCCUPATIONAL NOISE

CITY OF FORT BRAGG HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Prepared By: Blake Smith/James Stubbs

Environmental Health and Safety. Hearing Conservation Program

Procedure. Procedure

Hearing Conservation

San Diego Community College OSHA Standards

HEARING CONSERVATION CHECKLIST

Hearing Conservation Program

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY ENERGY SUPPLY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program. Southwestern Community College. Office of Human Resources

HEARING CONSERVATION PURPOSE

Hearing Conservation Program. Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053

Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing

POLICY TRAINING HEARING PROTECTION. Noise Exposure

This program is designed to prevent hearing loss for students, staff and employees while engaged in universitysponsored

Contents. 1) Purpose ) Policy ) Definitions ) Procedure a) Requirements b) Noise standard... 4

Hearing Conservation Program

SNAP-ON INCORPORATED STANDARD ON HEARING CONSERVATION

Your Company Hearing Conservation Program

NC Employees Workplace Program Requirements for Safety and Health. Hearing Conservation

East Carolina University

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Texas Christian University

HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

Delaware State University

Six Components of Hearing Conservation Program. Helene R. Freed, Ed.M Public Relations Specialist Industrial Hearing Testing

Hearing Conservation Program

NOISE & HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM YALE UNIVERSITY

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Services Specifications

Page104. Hearing Conservation Program

SUNY Cortland Environmental Health and Safety Office Hearing Conservation Program

INDH 5131 Controls of Occupational Hazards. Noise & Hearing Conservation. Part II. V. Audiometric Testing

Health, Safety, Security and Environment

OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY & HEALTH OPERATIONAL PROCEDURE

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM REVISED AS OF 12 JULY 2010

29 CFR OCCUPATIONAL NOISE EXPOSURE

Emerging Best Practices. Christine B. Petitti Directorate of Technical Support and Emergency Management OSHA

(b) is as low as is reasonably practicable, where it is not reasonably practicable to meet the standard under clause (a).

Health Standards to Protect Miners from Hearing Loss

Hearing Conservation Program

Villanova University Department of Environmental Health and Safety Policy and Procedure Manual

ILLINOIS STATE UNIVERSITY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

UCSD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM Environment, Health & Safety (EH&S) and Center for Occupational & Environmental Medicine (COEM) 2017

Medical Surveillance for Hearing Loss

The University of Texas at El Paso

Vision Painting Inc. Safety Management System

Town of Brunswick. Hearing Conservation Plan

Gettysburg College. Hearing Conservation Program

HEARING CONSERVATION REPORT

UNCONTROLLED IF PRINTED Hearing Conservation

Environmental Health & Safety Programs

SAINT MARY S COLLEGE OF CALIFORNIA STANDARD HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Prepared by SAINT MARY S COLLEGE OF CA MORAGA, CA KAREN LAURICELLA

Hearing Loss and Conservation in Industrial Settings

Hearing Conservation Program

OCCUPATIONAL NOISE PROGRAM

UC Santa Barbara Hearing Conservation Program Manual

Occupational Noise Exposure

North Dakota State University Noise/Hearing Conservation

Environment CAUTION HEARING PROTECTION REQUIRED. Occupational Noise Exposure Requirements for Photographic Processing Facilities

Hearing Conservation Terminology Courtesy of Workplace Integra, Inc.

Earplug Attenuation Validation As Part of a Hearing Conservation Program. David Friedman, CIH,MSPH, ARM Luminant

3M Center for Hearing Conservation

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing ConservationTraining

Noise Monitoring. T. Renée Anthony, PhD, CIH, CSP University of Iowa, College of Public Health

ACOUSTIC INFRASOUND AND LOW-FREQUENCY SOUND

Thank you for your interest in OSHA Recordkeeping information we hope the following slides assist you when maintaining your OSHA records.

Subject Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, On/After January 2, 1990

Purpose: To provide a process to protect employees from hearing loss caused by excessive occupational exposure to noise.

Noise Self-Inspection Checklist

Transcription:

What s New? OSHA Recordable Hearing Loss: What s New and What s Not Pierce M. Sherrill, D.O., FAOASM Aurora Medical Group Green Bay, Wisconsin 29 CFR 1904.10 final rules are intended to be: More Sensitive More Specific More Flexible i.e., the rules hope to identify more true work-related hearing loss, and exclude more false-positives. Which Hearing Losses Are Recordable? The previous rule required the recording of a Standard Threshold Shift (STS) of 25 db loss from baseline audiogram, averaged at 2000, 3000 and 4000Hz. Audiometric exams administered on or after January 1, 2003 are subject to a different standard: Which Hearing Losses Are Recordable? In order to be recordable in the OSHA 300 log, both of the following conditions must be met: The employee has experienced an STS of 10 db or greater from the most current baseline (averaged at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz, in one or both ears); AND The employee s total hearing level is 25 db or more above audiometric zero, averaged at 2000, 3000, and 4000 Hz, in the same ear(s) as the STS. Example 1 - Employee A Current 10 15 15 Threshold Shift 5 5 10 Avg. Shift = (5+5+10) 3 = 6.7 db Average shift is less than 10 db. This is not recordable. Example 2 Employee B Current 10 20 20 Threshold Shift 5 10 15 Avg. Shift = (5 + 10 + 15) 3 = 10 db This employee has experienced an STS of 10 db. Now look at the Total Hearing Level. O-1

Example 2 Employee B Current 10 20 20 Avg. Total Hearing Level = (10 + 20 + 20) 3 = 16.7 db This case is not recordable since both conditions have not been met. This employee has had an STS, but average Total Hearing Level is less than 25 db above audiometric zero. Example 3 Employee C Current 15 25 35 Threshold Shift 10 15 30 Avg. Shift = (10+15+30) 3 = 18.3 db Avg. Shift > 10, so this employee has experienced an STS. Now look at the Total Hearing Level. Example 3 Employee C Current 15 25 35 Avg. Total Hearing Level = (15+25+35) 3 = 25dB. This case is recordable. The employee has both an STS 10 db and an avg. Total Hearing Level 25 db above audiometric zero. Example 3 Employee C Once an STS has become recordable, it becomes the new baseline against which future audiograms are measured: New Baseline: 15 25 35 Previous: 5 10 5 Recordability Algorithm OSHA Recordable Hearing Loss Has the employee suffered an STS? (average 10 db or more relative to the most current baseline audiogram averaged at 2000, 3000, and 4000 in one or both ears per OSHA noise standard 1910.95? No Yes Do not record. Is the employee's overall hearing level 25 db or more above audiometric zero avg. at 2k, 3k, and 4k in the affected ear(s)? No Yes Do not record. Is the hearing loss work-related? No Yes Do not record. Record on the OSHA 300 log and check "All other illness." STS is now defined as 10 db in one or both ears, averaged at 2, 3 and 4 khz, above the current baseline BUT the STS is only recordable if: the affected ear(s) have a Total Hearing Loss 25 db above audiometric zero (not the most current baseline); AND The hearing loss is work-related. O-2

Is The Hearing Loss Work Related? There is no automatic presumption of work-relatedness. However: hearing loss is presumed to be work-related if the employee is exposed to noise in the workplace at an 8-hour time-weighted average of 85 dba or greater, or to a total noise dose of 50 percent, as defined in 29 CFR 1910.95. For hearing loss cases where the employee is not exposed to this level of noise, you must use the rules in 1904.5 to determine if the hearing loss is work-related. Federal Register 66:13, January 19, 2001 pg. 6129 Is The Hearing Loss Work Related? This must be determined on a case-bycase basis. Employers may seek a physician s advice on work-relatedness. If the employer has a doctor s opinion that the loss is not work-related, then it is not recordable. Example 4 Employee D Right ear: Current 45 55 55 Threshold Shift 40 45 50 STS >10; THL >25. Referred to ENT for further evaluation. Is this recordable? Example 4 Employee D Employee D was found to have a cholesteatoma in the right ear, which was surgically repaired. The cholesteatoma is responsible for his hearing loss. This loss is not workrelated. -- O. Larry Gologist, MD This hearing loss is NOT recordable. Example 4 Employee D Right ear: Pre-Op 45 55 55 Post-Op 30 35 35 The post-op audiogram is now the revised baseline, and should be used for future monitoring. Remember: Baselines are Adjustable If the employee has never previously experienced a recordable hearing loss, you must compare the employee s current audiogram with that employee s baseline audiogram. If the employee has previously experienced a recordable hearing loss, you must compare the employee s current audiogram with the employee s revised baseline audiogram (the audiogram reflecting the employee s previous recordable hearing loss case.) Federal Register 66:13, January 19, 2001 pg. 6129 O-3

Baselines are Adjustable i.e., when you record a work-related hearing loss, the audiogram reflecting that recordable hearing loss becomes the revised baseline for future monitoring. Baselines are Adjustable Revised Baseline. An annual audiogram may be substituted for the baseline audiogram when, in the judgment of the audiologist, otolaryngologist or physician who is evaluating the audiogram: The standard threshold shift revealed by the audiogram is persistent; or The hearing threshold shown in the annual audiogram indicates significant improvement over the baseline audiogram. 29CFR 1910.95 (g) (9) (i-ii) Not Only That- when comparing audiogram results, you may adjust the results for the employee s age when the audiogram was taken using Tables F-1 or F-2, as appropriate, in Appendix F of 29 CFR 1910.95. Federal Register 66:13, January 19, 2001 pg. 6129 To adjust for age: Use the tables in 29 CFR 1910.95, Appendix F, to find the age-correction value for the employee s age at the most current audiogram; Do the same for the employee s age at the baseline audiogram; Subtract baseline correction value from current correction value to find the portion of hearing loss that may be attributed to aging. Remember Employee C? Current (age 41) 15 25 35 Baseline (age 25) 5 10 5 From 29 CFR 1910.95, Appendix F, Table F-1 (Age Correction: Males) Age 41 6 10 14 Age 25 3 5 7 Difference 3 5 7 Total Hearing Loss = 25 db Age Adjustment = (3+5+7) 3 = 5 db Age-Adjusted Hearing Loss: 25-5 = 20 db Original STS = 18.6 db Adjusted THL = 20 db By adjusting for age, This case is no longer reportable. O-4

If hearing is retested within 30 calendar days of the original test, and it DOES NOT confirm the STS, then the original test is not recordable as a workrelated hearing loss. if you retest the employee s hearing within 30 days of the first test, and the retest does not confirm the STS, you are not required to record the hearing loss on the OSHA 300 log. If the retest confirms the STS, you must record the hearing loss illness within seven (7) calendar days of the retest. Federal Register 66:13, Jan 19, 2001 p. 6129 The new standard permits recorded entries to be lined-out or erased if subsequent audiometric testing does not confirm the STS. If subsequent audiometric testing indicates that a Standard Threshold Shift (STS) is not persistent, you may erase or line-out the recorded entry. 29 CFR 1910.95(m)(2) Note: The 30-Day Rule does not appear to apply here. While the rule does not require the employer to maintain documentation concerning the removal of cases, Section 1910.95(m)(2) of the noise standard requires the employer to keep records of all audiometric tests that are performed. Therefore, those records will be available, should they be needed for future reference. Frank Frodyma, Acting Director, OSHA Directorate of Evaluation and Analysis: letter to Carl O. Sail dated March 4, 2004 The noise standard remains the same. Employees covered by the noise standard remain the same. When employers detect ANY workrelated STS in an employee, they are required to take all the follow-up actions required by the noise standard. O-5

The noise standard remains the same. 29 CFR 1910.95, Occupational Noise Exposure. The employees covered by the noise standard remains the same. whenever employee noise exposures equal or exceed an 8-hour time-weighted average sound level (TWA) of 85 decibels measured on the A scale (slow response) or, equivalently, a dose of fifty percent. 29 CFR 1910.95(c)(1) When employers detect ANY workrelated STS in an employee, they are required to take all the follow-up actions required by the noise standard. OSHA Technical Manual, Section III, Chapter 5, Noise and Hearing Conservation, provides guidance. See http://www.osha.gov/dts/osta/noise/hcp/index.html Prevention of Hearing Loss Interventions include Engineering and Administrative Controls Hearing Conservation Program Interestingly: some OSHA standards, such as standards covering bloodborne pathogens and noise, do not have medical removal provisions. Federal Register 66:12, January 19, 2001, pg. 6129 Thank You Any Questions? O-6