PET and PET/CT Imaging for the Earliest Detection and Treatment of Colorectal Carcinoma

Similar documents
removal of adenomatous polyps detects important effectively as follow-up colonoscopy after both constitute a low-risk Patients with 1 or 2

This is the portion of the intestine which lies between the small intestine and the outlet (Anus).

Structured Follow-Up after Colorectal Cancer Resection: Overrated. R. Taylor Ripley University of Colorado Grand Rounds April 23, 2007

Supplementary Appendix

objectives Pitfalls and Pearls in PET/CT imaging Kevin Robinson, DO Assistant Professor Department of Radiology Michigan State University

CT PET SCANNING for GIT Malignancies A clinician s perspective

COLORECTAL CANCER FAISALGHANISIDDIQUI MBBS; FCPS; PGDIP-BIOETHICS; MCPS-HPE

Page 1. Is the Risk This High? Dysplasia in the IBD Patient. Dysplasia in the Non IBD Patient. Increased Risk of CRC in Ulcerative Colitis

Alberta Colorectal Cancer Screening Program (ACRCSP) Post Polypectomy Surveillance Guidelines

Clinical significance of incidental [18 F]FDG uptake in the gastrointestinal tract on PET/ CT imaging: a retrospective cohort study

8. The polyp in the illustration can be described as (circle all that apply) a. Exophytic b. Pedunculated c. Sessile d. Frank

Colon and Rectum: 2018 Solid Tumor Rules

Objectives. Definitions. Colorectal Cancer Screening 5/8/2018. Payam Afshar, MS, MD Kaiser Permanente, San Diego. Colorectal cancer background

Incidental Finding of Focal FDG Uptake in the Bowel During PET/ CT: CT Features and Correlation With Histopathologic Results

COLON AND RECTUM SOLID TUMOR RULES ABSTRACTORS TRAINING

DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES May 1, 2015 INTESTINES (EXCEPT RECTUM) Asst Surg Anae

Neoplastic Colon Polyps. Joyce Au SUNY Downstate Grand Rounds, October 18, 2012

12 Blueprints Q&A Step 2 Surgery

Polyps Adenomas Lipomas

11/21/13 CEA: 1.7 WNL

colorectal cancer Colorectal cancer hereditary sporadic Familial 1/12/2018

Surveying the Colon; Polyps and Advances in Polypectomy

Screening & Surveillance Guidelines

Disclosure. Acknowledgement. What is the Best Workup for Rectal Cancer Staging: US/MRI/PET? Rectal cancer imaging. None

The value of using fludeoxyglucose positron-emission tomography scan with respect to colorectal abnormalities a cross-sectional study

Take Home Quiz 1 Please complete the quiz below prior to the session. Use the Multiple Primary and Histology Rules

MULTIPLE CARCINOMAS OF THE LARGE INTESTINE- CASE REPORT AND A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

A916: rectum: adenocarcinoma

[A RESEARCH COORDINATOR S GUIDE]

Shore Medical Center Site-Specific Study: Colorectal Cancer 2013

Colonic Polyp. Najmeh Aletaha. MD

FDG-PET value in deep endometriosis

Clinicopathological Characteristics of Superficial Type

Caring for a Patient with Colorectal Cancer. Objectives. Poll question. UNC Cancer Network Presented on 10/15/18. For Educational Use Only 1

Large Colorectal Adenomas An Approach to Pathologic Evaluation

Colon, or Colorectal, Cancer Information

Alison Douglass Gillian Lieberman, MD. November. Colon Cancer. Alison Douglass, Harvard Medical School Year III Gillian Lieberman, MD

Neoplasms of the Colon and of the Rectum

Colorectal Cancer. Mark Chapman. MA MS FRCS EBSQ(coloproct) 21 st March 2018 Consultant Coloproctologist

New Visions in PET: Surgical Decision Making and PET/CT

Quality ID #343: Screening Colonoscopy Adenoma Detection Rate National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

performed to help sway the clinician in what the appropriate diagnosis is, which can substantially alter the treatment of management.

Imaging in gastric cancer

Colonic adenomas-a colonoscopy survey

Corporate Medical Policy

Morphologic Criteria of Invasive Colonic Adenocarcinoma on Biopsy Specimens

Summary. Cezary ŁozińskiABDF, Witold KyclerABCDEF. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother, 2007; 12(4):

Hyperplastische Polyps Innocent bystanders?

COLORECTAL CANCER CASES

VIII. 9. FDG-PET for Diagnosis of an Advanced Jejunal Adenocarcinoma with Distant Metastases, Compared with Gallium Scintigraphy

When is a programmed follow-up meaningful and how should it be done? Professor Alastair Watson University of Liverpool

Case Report PET/CT Imaging in Oncology: Exceptions That Prove the Rule

By: Tania Cortas, MD Arizona Oncology 03/10/2015

Colon and Rectum. Protocol revision date: January 2005 Based on AJCC/UICC TNM, 6th edition

Colorectal Neoplasia. Dr. Smita Devani MBChB, MRCP. Consultant Physician and Gastroenterologist Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi

Guidelines for Colonoscopy Surveillance After Screening and Polypectomy: A Consensus Update by the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer

SMALL BOWEL ADENOCARCINOMA. Dr. C. Jeske

Razvan I. Arsenescu, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Division of Digestive Diseases EARLY DETECTION OF COLORECTAL CANCER

Colon Cancer Screening and Surveillance. Louis V. Antignano, M.D. Wilson Gastroenterology October 11, 2011

EARLY DETECTION OF COLORECTAL CANCER. Epidemiology of CRC

Imaging Decisions Start Here SM

European evidence-based consensus on the use of imaging techniques in inflammatory bowel disease diagnosis and management

Esophageal Cancer. What is the value of performing PET scan routinely for staging of esophageal cancers

Romanian Journal of Morphology and Embryology 2006, 47(3):

Quality of and compliance with colonoscopy in Lynch Syndrome surveillance: are we getting it right?

PET/CT Frequently Asked Questions

International Journal of Current Research in Biosciences and Plant Biology ISSN: Volume 2 Number 7 (July-2015) pp

Colon Screening in 2014 Offering Patients a Choice. Clark A Harrison MD The Nevada Colon Cancer Partnership

AMSER Rad Path Case of the Month: December 2018

Colon Cancer Screening & Surveillance. Amit Patel, MD PGY-4 GI Fellow

World Journal of Colorectal Surgery

BENEFIT APPLICATION BLUE CARD/NATIONAL ACCOUNT ISSUES

what is the alternative mechanism of histogenesis? Aspects of the morphology of the adenomacarcinoma Morphology of the

The Clinical Meaning of Benign Colon Uptake in 18 F-FDG PET: Comparison with Colonoscopic Findings

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE

Colonoscopy Quality Data 2017

Colorectal Cancer and FDG PET/CT

Metastatic mechanism of spermatic cord tumor from stomach cancer

Intraoperative frozen section assessment in the evaluation of axillary sentinel lymph node in breast cancer

Imaging techniques in the diagnosis, staging and follow up of GI cancers. Moderators: Banke Agarwal, MD and Paul Schultz, MD

Multiple Primary Quiz

Colorectal Polyps in Average-Risk Thais: Colorectal Polyps in Average-Risk Thais: Evaluation with CT Colonography (Virtual Colonoscopy)

Value of sigmoidoscopy and biopsy in detection of

Small Bowel and Colon Surgery

Patologia sistematica V Gastroenterologia Prof. Stefano Fiorucci. Colon polyps. Colorectal cancer

Frequency of Diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer with Double Contrast Barium Enema

UNDERSTANDING X-RAYS: ABDOMINAL IMAGING THE ABDOMEN

IMAGING GUIDELINES - COLORECTAL CANCER

Commonly Encountered Neuro-Endocrine Tumors of the Gut

CLINICAL PRACTICE GUIDELINE FOR COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING

Clinical Study Small Bowel Tumors: Clinical Presentation, Prognosis, and Outcomein33PatientsinaTertiaryCareCenter

Colorectal Cancer Screening

Relationship between FDG uptake and the pathological risk category in gastrointestinal stromal tumors

PET- CT of the pancreas: The hot spots, the cold spots, the blind spots A quiz based review.

Staging Colorectal Cancer

Familial Adenomatous Polyposis

UPDATE IN THE MANAGEMENT AND TREATMENT OF COLORECTAL CANCER. Edwin A. Empaynado, MD Advocare Colon and Rectal Surgical Specialists

Pathology in Slovenian CRC screening programme:

Los Angeles Radiological Society 62 nd Annual Midwinter Radiology Conference January 31, 2010

Prognosis after Treatment of Villous Adenomas

Transcription:

169 Vol.48, Special : pp. 169-174, October 2005 ISSN 1516-8913 Printed in Brazil BRAZILIAN ARCHIVES OF BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL PET and PET/CT Imaging for the Earliest Detection and Treatment of Colorectal Carcinoma Kevin Carter 1 and Eduard Kotlyarov 2* 1 Michigan State University; POH Medical Center; Pontiac, Michigan - USA. 2 Michigan State University and Georgetown University; POH Medical Center; Pontiac; Michigan - USA. POH Medical Center; 50 Perry Street; Pontiac; 48342; Michigan - USA ABSTRACT Approximately 150,000 new cases of colorectal cancer are diagnosed each year with the life time risk of developing colon caner in developed nations being 4.6% in men and 3.2% in women. Screening patients is essential early detection of colon carcinoma to aid in complete resection. Unfortunately current screening methods carry with them poor patient compliance. PET and PET/CT may be a significant part of this screening solution. The authors reviewed and analyzed the English language articles and case reports identified on Medline during the last 10 years. PET and PET/CT results for colorectal carcinoma were tabulated and presented for the fifth Scientific Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Nuclear Biosciences. Though most studies have been retrospective analysis in using PET for staging for other malignant processes the cases that have identified additional uptake in the colon are important. The accuracy when utilizing PET and PET/CT in this screening method has a sensitivity between 65 and 90% with a specificity of 84 to 90% and a positive predictive value 71 to 78%. Early stages of malignancies and pre-cancerous polyps avidly accumulates F-18 Deoxyflouro glucose allowing us to conclude that whole body PET and PET/CT is an essential component in the work up, staging or treatment monitoring in colon carcinoma. We have to continue to accumulate data for possible introduction for whole body PET and PET/CT scanning for colon carcinoma and precancerous polyps. Key words: PET and PET/CT, colorectal cancer, diagnostic INTRODUCTION Approximately 150,000 new cases of colorectal cancer are diagnosed each year. It is second only to lung cancer as the cause of cancer deaths in the United States. There is an established high incidence of colorectal carcinoma in developed nations around the world. Unfortunately the life time risk of developing colon cancer in developed nations is 4.6% in men and 3.2% in women1. Colon carcinoma is generally found in patients greater than fifty years old. The incidence of this carcinoma has not changed in the last forty years, but recently mortality rates have improved. The current five year survival rate is approximately 61% from the time of diagnosis1. Colon carcinomas develop within preexisting foci of adenomatous tissue. This almost always occurs in a polypoid lesion because adenomatous change has rarely been seen to develop in intact mucosa. The size of the polyp is extremely important. Polyps 1.5 cm in size or less carry a less than 2% risk of developing into colon cancer, but as the polyp grows in size, risk for developing carcinoma * Author for correspondence

170 Carter, K. and Kotlyarov, E. increases. Polyps that are 2.5 cm or greater in size have a risk than is greater than 10% of developing into colon cancer. (Table I). There are many risk factors that may contribute to developing to colorectal cancer, these include: age, diet, genetic factors, predisposing medical conditions, and a smoking history1. Any person greater than 40 years old is already at an increased risk for developing colon cancer, the peak age of onset in the United States is 65. Western diets also contribute to colon carcinoma risk, this includes being high in animal fats, which is felt to expose the colon to an elevated level of carcinogens. Also diets low in fiber, which result in increased colonic transit time lead to prolonged exposure to colonic carcinogens. Finally, it is felt that diets low in calcium and folate may contribute to an increased risk1. Their relationship is still being investigated. It has been well established that underlying medial conditions will predispose certain patients for developing colon cancer. These include having a history of inflammatory bowel disease, either ulcerative colitis or Crohn s disease. In ulcerative colitis the risk is related to the extent and duration of disease. In Crohn s disease, the risk is related to the amount of colonic involvement, increased with more extensive colonic disease. A prior history of colorectal cancer or cancerous polyps will increase the likelihood of developing carcinoma. The incidence of metachronous colorectal cancer is 0.5% to 3% 1. METHODS AND RESULTS The authors reviewed and analyzed the English language articles and case reports identified on Medline during the last 10 years. PET and PET/CT results for colorectal carcinoma were tabulated and presented for the fifth Scientific Meeting of the Brazilian Society of Nuclear Biosciences. Screening patients is essential in helping to detect colon carcinoma early to aid in complete resection. Unfortunately current screening methods carry with them poor patient compliance. PET and PET/CT may be a significant part of this screening solution. It has already been established in the diagnosis and staging of colon carcinoma. In 134 patients studied, PET alone showed an accuracy of 94% versus 81% for CT. In the preoperative workup of patients for staging, PET has already displayed it usefulness. In a study of 16 patients with malignant colon lesions, FDG- PET imaging detected 13 areas of increased activity in the region of the colon and rectum. Twelve of these 13 were confirmed malignant by histology and one was flasly positive. This helped to illustrate PET s usefulness in imaging the colon and rectum. Some of the initial data concerning the use of PET in screening for colorectal carcinoma has come from Japan where members of a medical health club underwent whole body PET imaging for screening. Of these members there were three true positives, and no false negatives. Seven false positive results were observed in these participants, who underwent colonoscopic examination after screening because of positive PET results. One was found to have ulcerative colitis of the descending colon and the other seven were found to have proctitis. This illustrates one of the few concerns with PET that a high FDG uptake can be observed in localized inflammatory lesions which can result in false positive findings. The conclusions from this study were that primary colorectal cancer can be depicted with PET in the early stage. This same group later performed a retrospective study of 110 patients who underwent both PET and total colonoscopy. Of these patients, 59 adenomatous polyps, 5-30mm in size were detected in 30 subjects by total colonoscopy. PET findings were positive for 14 of these 59 adenomas (24%). The positivity rate for PET images rose with the increase in size of the adenomas. It was over 90% accurate in adenomas that were larger than 13mm in size. Overall in the study the false-positive rate was 5.5% (6 out of 110 patients). In an endoscopic validation of FDG-PET imaging, 39 patients underwent both FDG-PET and endoscopy in a 2 year period. In comparison with colonscopy FDG-PET had a sensitivity of 74% and a specificity of 84%. The positive predictive value of FDG-PET was 78%. Again, FDG-PET failed to detect small polyps (3-10mm in size) in four patients. All of the false positive PET findings were due to inflammatory lesions. In the recent study, as part of a PET exam for a second malignancy, not related to colon cancer, a total of 1,000 PET scans were reviewed where 16 (1.6%) of these has a total of 20 focal sites of FDG uptake within the abdomen. Within this group 10 patients were biopsied for a total of 14 lesions (out of the original 20). 2 of the 14 were adenocarinoma, 6/14 were tubulovillous adenoma, 1/14 were tubular adenoma and 3/14 were

PET and PET/CT Imaging for the Earliest Detection and Treatment 171 peritoneal metastasis. 2 of 14 had no apparent abnormality, but six months later, an adenocarcinoma was discovered at this site. The remaining 6/20 were lost to followup, but had negative CT. Therefore 65% of focal uptake was either pre-malignant or a malignant lesion (Fig. 1). Numerous case reports have been described finding an unknown area of increased FDG uptake in the colorectal region during a PET scan for another reason. One of these describes a patient who was undergoing PET for staging a large tumor in her ascending colon. At PET there were two areas of increased uptake recognized, one in the ascending colon and the other in the left suprapubic region. This was followed up with laparoscopy showing the lesion in the distal portion of the ascending colon and also detected in the sigmoid colon with invasion of the posterior wall of the bladder and uterus. In another case report where a 71 year old male presented with acute abdominal pain and a known small-cell carcinoma, CT was performed that determined there to be an intussusception, but no abnormality was detected. PET was performed to evaluate the lung lesion and detected a synchronous colonic adenocarcinoma. In a large retrospective study that reviewed the records of 500 consecutive patients referred for evaluation of pulmonary nodules via PET, 197 had no previous clinical or radiographic evidence of abnormalities of the GI tract. Among these patients, 59 had diffuse colonic uptake in various segments of the colon. Seventeen of the patients had focal colonic uptake, five of which were proved to be colon cancer. Table 1 Size Risk of Developing Colon Cancer 1.5 cm or less Less than 2% 1.5 to 2.5 cm 2-10% 2.5 cm or greater Greater than 10% Figure 1-82 year old male presented for staging of lung carcinoma, was found to have two abnormal areas of FDG uptake in his colon. Following colonoscopy the focus in the sigmoid colon was a 3cm tubulovillous adenoma, the focus in the cecum was also found to be a tubulovillous adenoma.

172 Carter, K. and Kotlyarov, E. Figure 2 - The focal areas of uptake within the region of the sigmoid colon may be mistaken for a foci of carcinoma without correlation with the anatomic information provided by the CT. When correlated with the CT findings, it is clear that these foci of uptake are due to FDG being excreted by a normal pelvic kidney.

PET and PET/CT Imaging for the Earliest Detection and Treatment 173 Figure 3 - This 70 year old male presented with a history of colon cancer and a rising CEA. Initial whole body PET images were non specific in the location for this localized uptake. Following fusion images with PET/CT the diagnosis of uptake in the presacral soft tissues which was consistant with recurrence. With the fusion images, this diagnosis was made with improved confidence. Most recently a study of 1750 FDG-PET scans were obtained to evaluate a variety of known or suspected malignancies. In these cases, 58 abnormal, unexpected foci of hypermetabolism were identified in 53 patients. Among the 42 unexpected findings that had histopathologic confirmation, 30 foci in 25 patients were either malignant or premalignant tumors (positive predicitive value, 71% (30 of 42)). These included 18 colonic adenomas (six villous, four tubulovillous, and eight tubular) and three colonic adenocarcinomas. Utilizing only PET for screening and identifying focal uptake in the abdomen poses a special problem due to the irregular uptake that can be observed in the intestine and other organs specifically the uterus, ureters, and pelvic musculature (Fig. 2). In this setting, PET/CT offers an important advantage because the CT component provides an anatomic framework for the PET findings, particularly in localizing FDG uptake to prevent false positive findings. The net effect of these PET/CT fusion images is improved confidence in distinguishing abnormal from physiologic uptake (See Figure 3). In a group of 3,270 Chinese patients who underwent screening PET/CT, 20 asymptomatic neoplasms were found in the colon (6 carcinomas and 14 adenomas). These lesions appeared as hot spots that were focal within the bowel. The PET/CT allowed for an improved confidence in this interpretation aiding in identifing if uptake was infact physiologic or pathologic.12 The fact that early staging of malignancies and pre-cancerous polyps avidly accumulates F-18 Deoxyflouroglucose allows us to conclude that whole body PET Scanning, especially when combined with CT in fusion PET/CT images, is a must in everyday practice in the work up, staging or treatment monitoring in colon carcinoma. We have to continue to accumulate data for possible introduction for whole body PET/CT scanning for use in screening for colon carcinoma and precancerous polyps. CONCLUSIONS Early stages of malignancies and pre-cancerous polyps avidly accumulates F-18 Deoxyflouro

174 Carter, K. and Kotlyarov, E. glucose allowing us to conclude that whole body PET and PET/CT is an essential component in the work up, staging or treatment monitoring in colon carcinoma. We have to continue to accumulate data for possible introduction for whole body PET and PET/CT scanning for colon carcinoma and precancerous polyps. RESUMO Aproximadamente, 150 000 novos casos de câncer coloretal são diagnosticados, anualmente, em países em desenvolvimento. Destes, 4,6% em homens e 3,2% em mulheres. A triagem de pacientes é essencial na detecção precoce do carcinoma de colon para ajudar na completa ressecção. Infelizmente, os métodos de exame atualmente disponíveis contam com uma baixa adesão dos pacientes. Parte significativa da solução desse problema pode estar no uso de PET e PET/CT. Os autores revisaram e analisaram os artigos e relatos de casos disponíveis no idioma inglês encontrados no Medline durante os últimos 10 anos. Para o Quinto Encontro Científico da Sociedade Brasileira de Biociências Nucleares, foram tabulados e apresentados os resultados de PET e PET/CT para carcinoma coloretal. Embora muitos casos têm sido resultados de uma análise retrospectiva do uso de PET para o estadiamento de outros processos malignos, aqueles casos que apresentaram uma captação adicional no colon foram considerados importantes. A precisão de PET e PET/CT como método de triagem tem sensibilidade entre 65% e 90% com especificidade de 84% a 90% e um valor preditivo positivo entre 71% a 78%. Estágios iniciais de malignidade e pólipos pré-cancerosos apresentaram ávido acúmulo de F-18 desóxi-fluoro-glicose, permitindo-nos concluir que PET e PET/CT de corpo inteiro é uma ferramenta valiosa no estadiamento e moninotoramento do tratamento do câncer de cólon. Nós continuamos a obter dados para possível introdução do PET de corpo inteiro e PET/CT scanning para o diagnóstico de carcinoma de colon e pólipos pré-cancerosos. REFERENCES Agress, H. et al. (2004), Radiology, 230, 417-422. Pin, C. A. et al. (2000), Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 25 : (5), 370-371. Chiehuan, Y.; Kaminski, M. D. et al. (2003), Clinical Nuclear Medicine, 28 : (1), 60-61. Cohade C et al (2003), Direct comparison of 18 F-FDG PET and PET/CT in patients with colorectal carcinoma. J. Nuclear Med., 44, 1797-1803. Falk, M. D. et al. (1994), Diseases of the Colon and Rectum, 37 : (2), 155-156. Gambhir, S. S. et al. (2001), Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 42, 95-125. Hongming Huang, MD, et al, Clinical Nuclear Medicine, Vol. 27, No. 9, 2002, pp. 628-632. Joost P.H. Dreath, et al. European Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol 28, No 12, Dec 2001. Larson, Steven et al, PET/CT functional imaging of Esophageal and Colorectal Cancer. Cancer Journal, Jul-Aug 2004 10 (4) 243-250. Selei Yasuda et al, Japanese Journal of Clinical Oncology, Vol 28, No 10, 1998, pp 638-640. Selei Yasuda et al, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine, Vol 42, No 7, July 2001, pp. 989-992. Yamada Tedataka, M. D. (2003), Textbook of gastroenterology. 4 th ed. v. 2. pp. 1959-1963. Received: June 04, 2005; Revised: July 14, 2005; Accepted: August 01, 2005.