Immunological response to metallic implants

Similar documents
The inflammatory process and immune reactions associated with implant use

2.79J/3.96J/BE.441/HST522J BIOMATERIALS FOR JOINT REPLACEMENT

Systematic Review of Clinical Outcome using Titanium Fiber Mesh Porous Ingrowth Surfaces

Defensive mechanisms include :

Workshop on Nickel Dermatitis NACD & Implants Rosemont, IL 23 June 2016

Third line of Defense

Painful Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty

JPEMS Nantes, Basic Immunology Introduction to the immune system Definitions Structure and General Organization

Prospective analysis of human leukocyte functional tests reveals metal sensitivity in patients with hip implant

Principles of Adaptive Immunity

Adaptive (acquired) immunity. Professor Peter Delves University College London

VMC-221: Veterinary Immunology and Serology (1+1) Question Bank

Third line of Defense. Topic 8 Specific Immunity (adaptive) (18) 3 rd Line = Prophylaxis via Immunization!

The Immune System: Innate and Adaptive Body Defenses Outline PART 1: INNATE DEFENSES 21.1 Surface barriers act as the first line of defense to keep

Immunity. Avian Physiology

ACTIVATION OF T LYMPHOCYTES AND CELL MEDIATED IMMUNITY

TCR, MHC and coreceptors

Revision of a tibial baseplate using a customized oxinium component in a case of suspected metal allergy A case report

Blood and Immune system Acquired Immunity

CELL BIOLOGY - CLUTCH CH THE IMMUNE SYSTEM.

Effector T Cells and

There are 2 major lines of defense: Non-specific (Innate Immunity) and. Specific. (Adaptive Immunity) Photo of macrophage cell

Part III Innate and Adaptive Immune Cells: General Introduction

Basic immunology. Lecture 7. Innate immunity, pattern recognition. Péter Engelmann

Introduction to Immune System

T-cell activation T cells migrate to secondary lymphoid tissues where they interact with antigen, antigen-presenting cells, and other lymphocytes:

T-cell activation T cells migrate to secondary lymphoid tissues where they interact with antigen, antigen-presenting cells, and other lymphocytes:

NANO 243/CENG 207 Course Use Only

For questions 1-5, match the following with their correct descriptions. (24-39) A. Class I B. Class II C. Class III D. TH1 E. TH2

Basic immunology. Lecture 9. Innate immunity: inflammation, leukocyte migration. Péter Engelmann

Case Report Patellofemoral Joint Replacement and Nickel Allergy: An Unusual Presentation

No allergic reaction after TKA in a chrome-cobalt-nickel-sensitive patient: case report and review of the literature

11/25/2017. THE IMMUNE SYSTEM Chapter 43 IMMUNITY INNATE IMMUNITY EXAMPLE IN INSECTS BARRIER DEFENSES INNATE IMMUNITY OF VERTEBRATES

Measuring Dendritic Cells

Adaptive Immunity: Specific Defenses of the Host

Question 1. Kupffer cells, microglial cells and osteoclasts are all examples of what type of immune system cell?

Scott Abrams, Ph.D. Professor of Oncology, x4375 Kuby Immunology SEVENTH EDITION

Designed for life. Implant technology with unmatched wear performance

Immunology Lecture 4. Clinical Relevance of the Immune System

Plain Film CT. Principal Modality (2): Case Report # [] Date accepted: 15 March 2014

General Biology. A summary of innate and acquired immunity. 11. The Immune System. Repetition. The Lymphatic System. Course No: BNG2003 Credits: 3.

The Immune System. These are classified as the Innate and Adaptive Immune Responses. Innate Immunity

Immune response. This overview figure summarizes simply how our body responds to foreign molecules that enter to it.

Cobalt-Alloy Implant Debris Induce HIF-1a Hypoxia Associated Responses: A Mechanism for Metal-Specific Orthopedic Implant Failure

Supplementary Figure 1. Example of gating strategy

All animals have innate immunity, a defense active immediately upon infection Vertebrates also have adaptive immunity

Case report: Pain L THR [ post THR 2 years; with history of trivial fall] Your Diagnosis?

ACTIVATION AND EFFECTOR FUNCTIONS OF CELL-MEDIATED IMMUNITY AND NK CELLS. Choompone Sakonwasun, MD (Hons), FRCPT

LYMPHOCYTES & IMMUNOGLOBULINS. Dr Mere Kende, Lecturer SMHS

Prof. Ibtesam Kamel Afifi Professor of Medical Microbiology & Immunology

The Adaptive Immune Responses

CASE 56 Hip Pain. ? Diagnosis

Catherine Bladen, John Fisher, Eileen Ingham, Joanne Tipper University of Leeds, UK

Chapter 21: Innate and Adaptive Body Defenses

ARTICLE IN PRESS. Surface Oxidized Zirconium Total Hip Arthroplasty Head Damage Due to Closed Reduction. Effects on Polyethylene Wear

LEGION Total Knee System. Exceptional Durability

M.Sc. III Semester Biotechnology End Semester Examination, 2013 Model Answer LBTM: 302 Advanced Immunology

Chapter 22: The Lymphatic System and Immunity

Accumulation in Liver and Spleen of Metal Particles Generated at Nonbearing Surfaces in Hip Arthroplasty

7/6/2009. The study of the immune system and of diseases that occur as a result of inappropriate or inadequate actions of the immune system.

Mon, Wed, Fri 11:00 AM-12:00 PM. Owen, Judy, Jenni Punt, and Sharon Stranford Kuby-Immunology, 7th. Edition. W.H. Freeman and Co., New York.

Chapter 10 (pages ): Differentiation and Functions of CD4+ Effector T Cells Prepared by Kristen Dazy, MD, Scripps Clinic Medical Group

Innate immunity. Abul K. Abbas University of California San Francisco. FOCiS

Immunology for the Rheumatologist

Lecture 9: T-cell Mediated Immunity

Contact. Protip. Scientific coordinator. Dr. Engin Vrana Steinbeis-Europa-Zentrum

Properties & Overview of IRs Dr. Nasser M. Kaplan JUST, Jordan. 10-Jul-16 NM Kaplan 1

Evaluation of Drug Hypersensitivity by flow cytometry (technical session)

Adaptive Immunity: Humoral Immune Responses

Cellular Immune response. Jianzhong Chen, Ph.D Institute of immunology, ZJU

Bruce A. Beutler and Jules A. Hoffmann. Ralph M. Steinman

In other words. how to prevent David from killing Goliath. Tammy Rickabaugh, Ph.D. January 14, 2014

1. The scavenger receptor, CD36, functions as a coreceptor for which TLR? a. TLR ½ b. TLR 3 c. TLR 4 d. TLR 2/6

Immunology lecture: 14. Cytokines: Main source: Fibroblast, but actually it can be produced by other types of cells

Phase of immune response

The Immune System. by Dr. Carmen Rexach Physiology Mt San Antonio College

Microbiology 204: Cellular and Molecular Immunology

WHY IS THIS IMPORTANT?

Overview. Barriers help animals defend against many dangerous pathogens they encounter.

Immunity. Acquired immunity differs from innate immunity in specificity & memory from 1 st exposure

chapter 17: specific/adaptable defenses of the host: the immune response

Physiology Unit 3. ADAPTIVE IMMUNITY The Specific Immune Response

CHAPTER 18: Immune System

The Adaptive Immune Response. T-cells

immunity produced by an encounter with an antigen; provides immunologic memory. active immunity clumping of (foreign) cells; induced by crosslinking

Introduction to Immunology Part 2 September 30, Dan Stetson

Defense mechanisms of the body II. Adaptive/aquired immunity. Blood group antigenes

Adaptive Immune Response Day 2. The Adaptive Immune Response

1. Overview of Adaptive Immunity

immunity defenses invertebrates vertebrates chapter 48 Animal defenses --

Immunology. T-Lymphocytes. 16. Oktober 2014, Ruhr-Universität Bochum Karin Peters,

Allergy and Immunology Review Corner: Chapter 13 of Immunology IV: Clinical Applications in Health and Disease, by Joseph A. Bellanti, MD.

COURSE: Medical Microbiology, MBIM 650/720 - Fall TOPIC: Antigen Processing, MHC Restriction, & Role of Thymus Lecture 12

1. Specificity: specific activity for each type of pathogens. Immunity is directed against a particular pathogen or foreign substance.

DNA vaccine, peripheral T-cell tolerance modulation 185

Immune Regulation and Tolerance

Cutaneous Immunology: Innate Immune Responses. Skin Biology Lecture Series

Introduction to Immunopathology

The power of simplicity

T Cell Effector Mechanisms I: B cell Help & DTH

Transcription:

Immunological response to metallic implants Doc. dr. Peter Korošec Head of Laboratory for Clinical Immunology & Molecular Genetics Head of Research & Development Department University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik

Mechanisms Testing Inflammation: Biologic effect of implant debris Hypersensitivity: Metal-induced allergy Methodology In vivo versus in vitro (dermal patch testing) Metals in human body fluids LTT or LAT (proliferation or activation of T Ly) Case report (LAT testing) Clinical significance

Inflammation: Biologic effect of implant debris Particulate wear debris (of metals, ceramics or polymers) range in size from nanometers to millimeters. Polymeric particles produced from implants generally fall into the range from 0.23 to 1 µm. Metal and ceramic particles are generally an order of magnitude smaller than polymer particles. There are few guidelines on what type of debris is most bioreactive and only little agreement on which types of particles are most bioreactive.

General particle characteristics on which local inflammation has been shown to depend: 1. Particle load (particle size and total volume) 2. Aspect ratio 3. Chemical reactivity 1. Greater particle load: Size and volume increase inflammation Inflammatory response generally is proportional to the particle load or concentration of phagocytosable particles per tissue volume, and is also dependent on the average particle size. To produce an in vitro inflammatory response, particles need to be more than 150 nm to 10 µm, that is to say, within a phagocytosable range.

2. Elongated particles (fibers) are more proinflammatory than round particles This phenomena has been well established, with the first investigations over 30 years ago involving asbestos fibers. Bruch J. Response of cell cultures to asbestos fibers. Environ Health Perspect. 1974 3. More chemically reactive particles are more proinflammatory There is a growing consensus that metal particles are more proinflammatory or toxic, or both, when compared to polymers. Ramachandran et al. The effects of titanium and polymethylmethacrylate particles on osteoblast phenotypic stability. J Biomed Mater Res A. 2006 This opinion is not unanimous. Others have concluded that polymers are more proinflammatory than metals. von Knoch et al. Migration of polyethylene wear debris in one type of uncemented femoral component with circumferential porous coating: an autopsy study of 5 femurs. J Arthroplasty. 2000

Debris-induced immune activation is primarily mediated by innate immunity = macrophages nonspecific immunity Debris-induced immune activation Aseptic inflammation Aseptic osteolysis Hallab&Jacobs Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 2009 Implant failure

Nobel Prize in Medicine 2011 Bruce A. Beutler Jules A. Hoffmann Ralph M. Steinman Bruce A. Beutler Jules A. Hoffmann For their discoveries concerning the specific activation of innate immunity: NLR = NOD like receptors (NALP3) TLR = Toll like receptors Ralph M. Steinman For his discovery of the dendritic cell and its role in adaptive immunity.

Phagocytosing debris induce inflammasome danger-signaling (NALP3). Potent proinflammatory cytokine IL-1β is produced.

NFkβ pathway induction of TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and PGE2 Vermes J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001 1. Decreased osteoblast function Decreased osteoblast deposition (compromise mesenchymal stem-cell differentiation into functional osteoblasts) Inhibition of collagen synthesis Induction of apoptosis 2. Osteoclast activity increases Stimulate differentiation of osteoclast precursors into mature osteoclasts Increase bone resorption, which is not replaced by new bone

Hypersensitivity to metal ions : Metal-induced allergy All metals corrode in vivo and the released ions can activate the immune system by forming complexes with native proteins (hapten concept). Metals known as sensitizers include beryllium, nickel, cobalt, and chromium, while occasional responses have been reported to tantalum, titanium, and vanadium. The specific T-cell subpopulations, the cellular mechanism of recognition and activation, and the antigenic metal-protein determinants created by these metals, remain incompletely characterized. Type I: IgE-mediated hypersensitivity Type II: IgG-mediated cytotoxicity Type III: immune complex deposition Type IV: T-cell mediated hypersensitivity

Haptens are chemically reactive small molecules (mostly <1000 D) that bind covalently to a larger protein or peptide. T-cell sensitization occurs when such hapten-carrier complexes are taken up by antigen-presenting cells (APCs) and then transported into the local draining lymphoid tissue, where they are processed and presented on major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs). Budinger Allergy 2000 Metal-induced allergy Pichler Mayo Clin Proc 2009 Drug-induced allergy

Testing In vivo dermal patch testing Allergens are applied epicutaneously to uninvolved skin for 48 h and the skin reaction is evaluated at the time of their removal and again 24 h later. There is continuing concern about the applicability of skin testing for the study of immune responses to implants regarding the questionable equivalence of dermal Langerhans cells to peri-implant antigen presenting cells. Similar dermal patch is not optimal for testing T-cell mediated drug hypersensitivity.

Metals in human body fluids Approximate concentrations of metal in human body fluids and in human tissue with and without total joint replacements. Ti Serum: TJA 1.5x of normal Synovial Fluid: TJA 43x of normal Co or Cr Serum: TJA 2.3x or 6x of normal Synovial Fluid: TJA 118x or 128x of normal Jacobs J Bone Joint Surg Am 1998. Stulberg J Biomed Mat Res Appl Biomat 1994

LTT or LAT = measurement of metal-reacting T cells (Alternatively: cytokine production) T cells play a key role in delayed-type hypersensitivity reactions. Their reactivity can be assessed by their proliferation or activation in response to the antigen. LTT = lymphocyte transformation test Generating antigen-reactive T-cell lines and T-cell clones from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) cultures isolated from patients and stimulated with antigen (48h). Its require 3H-thymidine incorporation! LTT-MELISA (Memory Lymphocyte Immuno Stimulation Assay), an commercial lymphocyte transformation test (www.melisa.org) Stimulation indices (SI) is calculated as counts per minutes (cpm) in culture medium (CM) with antigen divided by cpm in CM without antigen. A stimulation index of is a 2 cut-off value SI < 2: is considered negative SI 2 but <3: a possible sensitization SI 3: positive sensitization SI 2 3 weakly positive SI 3 5 positive SI > 5 strongly positive

LAT = lymphocyte activation test Measurement of CD69 up regulation on antigen-reactive T-cells and T-cell clones from peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) cultures isolated from patients and stimulated with antigen. Its require FACS, it distinguish CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, highly quantitative. Freshly isolated PBMC (2 10 5 ) are cultured for 48h in U-bottomed tissue culture plates in the presence of indicated drug or metal concentrations, and PHA (positive control) or culture medium without antigen. CD69 expression on CD4+/CD8+ T cells is measured by flow cytometry with anti-human monoclonal antibodies (mab) PE-CD69, PerCP-CD3, FITC- CD4, APC-CD8 and PE-IgG1 as isotype control (BD).

Clinical significance Host response to orthopaedic implants debris is central to clinical performance. Implant loosening due to aseptic osteolysis accounts for over 75% of total joint arthroplasty implant failure (infection only 7%) and is the predominant factor limiting the longevity of current TJAs. Debris-induced immune reactivity, aseptic inflammation, and subsequent early failure have been reported to be as high as 4% to 5% at 6 to 7 years after surgery in current generation metal-on-metal TJA. Korovessis et al.metallosis after contemporary metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.five to nine-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006 Milosev et al. Survivorship and retrieval analysis of Sikomet metal-on-metal total hip replacements at a mean of seven years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006

Cohort Studies of Implant-Related MetalSensitivity (metal sensitivity for nickel, cobalt or chromium) The prevalence of metal sensitivity in patients with failed implants is approximately six-times that of the general population and approximately two- to three-times that of all patients. Metal-on-metal have been associated with greater prevalence of metal sensitivity than simila designs with metal-on-uhmwpe. Hallab Bulletin of the NYU Hospital for Joint Diseases 2009