Dauphin County MH/ID Mental Health and Forensic Initiatives PRESENTATION TO RCPA SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

Similar documents
Policy and interventions for adults with serious mental illness and criminal justice involvement

Behavioral Health Diversion Strategies

An Overview of Risk-Needs- Responsivity Model: Application to Behavioral Health Populations

Eighth Judicial District Court. Specialty Courts. Elizabeth Gonzalez. Chief Judge. DeNeese Parker. Specialty Court Administrator

Allegheny County Justice Related Services for Individuals with Mental Illness:

Addressing a National Crisis: Too Many Individuals with Mental Illnesses in our Jails

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DRUG COURT. An Overview

Addressing a National Crisis Too Many People with Mental Illnesses in our Jails

Judicially Managed Accountability and Recovery Court (JMARC) as a Community Collaborative. Same People. Different Outcomes.

The Cost of Imprisonment

Behavioral Health Diversion Interventions

Guidelines for the Successful Transition of People with Behavioral Health Disorders from Jail and Prison

Medication Assisted Treatment in the Justice System. NCSL Law, Criminal Justice and Public Safety Committee Breakfast

Behavioral Health and Justice Involved Populations

Responding to Homelessness. 11 Ideas for the Justice System

Ask the Doctor Webinar Series:

MINNESOTA DWI COURTS: A SUMMARY OF EVALUATION FINDINGS IN NINE DWI COURT PROGRAMS

For Whom Does Jail Diversion Work?

Douglas County s Mental Health Diversion Program

FY17 Planning & Implementation Guide

PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY VETERANS TREATMENT COURT

MORE TREATMENT, BETTER TREATMENT AND THE RIGHT TREATMENT

Smart on Crime, Smart on Drugs

Criminal Justice Reform: Treatment and Substance Use Disorder

Restructuring Proposal for the Criminal Division of the Circuit Court of Cook County

Co-Occurring Mental Health & Substance Abuse Disorders

A Dose of Evaluation:

Community-based sanctions

West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety

National Findings on Mental Illness and Drug Use by Prisoners and Jail Inmates. Thursday, August 17

The intersection of mental illness and the criminal justice system

Best Practices in Forensic Mental Health

Responding to Homelessness. 11 Ideas for the Justice System

Trauma and Justice Strategic Initiative: Trauma Informed Care & Trauma Specific Services

Giving People a Second Chance

D R. T E R R I T I M B E R L A K E J I L L M A Y S

The Right Prescription for the Mentally Ill in the Texas Corrections System

THE 21ST CENTURY CURES ACT: TACKLING MENTAL HEALTH FROM THE INSIDE OUT

Alternatives to Incarceration and Pretrial Detention. NYSAC Legislative Conference January 2019

Peer Support Roles in Criminal Justice Settings

Transition from Jail to Community. Reentry in Washtenaw County

Community Supervision Agencies and Collaborative Comprehensive Case Plans

PROMISING SHORT TERM INTERVENTIONS:

Criminal Justice in Arizona

Community Response Addressing The Opioid Crisis. Leon, Wakulla, Gadsden, Franklin, Liberty, Jefferson, Madison and Taylor Counties

Introduction to the Six Questions County Leaders Need to Ask. February 2017

THE ESTIMATED ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND BENEFITS OF ACCOUNTABILITY COURT PROGRAMS IN GEORGIA EVIDENCE FROM A SURVEY OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

DWI Court Research and Best Practices:

Speaker: Ruby Qazilbash. Ruby Qazilbash Associate Deputy Director Bureau of Justice Assistance Office of Justice Programs U.S. Department of Justice

Stephanie Welch, MSW Executive Officer, COMIO Office of the Secretary, Scott Kernan California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation (CDCR)

Middlesex Sheriff s Office NCSL Atlantic States Fiscal Leaders Meeting Presentation

Addressing Co-Occurring Disorders in Court-Based Programs

Mid-1970s to mid- 80s, U.S. s incarceration rate doubled. Mid- 80s to mid- 90s, it doubled again. In absolute terms, prison/jail population from 1970

2016 Annual Meeting Conference

OVERVIEW OF STATE OPIOID POLICY AND LEGISLATION AMBER WIDGERY & ALISON LAWRENCE JUNE 2018

Angie Boarman Forensic Treatment Program Manager FSSA Division of Mental Health and Addiction

LUCAS COUNTY TASC, INC. OUTCOME ANALYSIS

Background/Analyses TABLE #1

Law Enforcement Prison Court Outreach

Federal Resources for Research on Drugs and Crime. Meeting of Caribbean National Observatories on Drugs August 5, 2009

West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety

Prison-Based Therapeutic Community Treatment: The California Experience

BJA Peer Recovery Support Services Mentor Initiative: Mentor Application

Rockland County District Attorney s Office. Misdemeanor Intervention Program (MIP)

Jail Health Behavioral Health Services: Interventions to Reduce Criminal Justice Involvement. January Title. Subtitle 11

Hennepin County Drug Court & Change the Outcome

Chester County Report of the Cross Systems Mapping Workshop June 29, 2010

TUCSON CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COURT

Problem-Solving Courts : A Brief History. The earliest problem-solving court was a Drug Court started in Miami-Dade County, FL in 1989

SOLICITATION FOR APPLICATIONS

FY17 Justice and Mental Health Collaboration Program Category 3 Orientation Webinar. Tuesday, November 21, 2017

The Public Safety Coordinating Council s. Criminal Justice System Data Book January 2014

HEALTHIER LIVES, STRONGER FAMILIES, SAFER COMMUNITIES:

Berks County Treatment Courts

Brittany Hurst California State University, Long Beach May 2016

Colorado Statewide DWI and Drug Court Process Assessment and Outcome Evaluation

Evaluation of the First Judicial District Court Adult Drug Court: Quasi-Experimental Outcome Study Using Historical Information

CHEROKEE TRIBAL DRUG COURT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING made and entered into on the 1 st day

DUAL DIAGNOSIS CROSS-FUNCTIONAL TEAM

Who is with us today? Colorado Domestic Violence Offender Management Board New Directions in Offender Treatment 2016

BJA Performance Measures

In January 2016, and in response to the Opiate Epidemic, Henrico County Sheriff, Michael

Forensic Counselor Education Course

CHAPTER 1 An Evidence-Based Approach to Corrections

Assessment of the Safe Streets Treatment Options Program (SSTOP)

Restorative Justice Model Of Mental Health Courts

JUSTICE REINVESTMENT: FOUNDATIONAL REQUIREMENTS FOR EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY-CENTERED OFFENDER REHABILITATION. Hon. Frank L. Racek

Prison Population Reduction Strategies Through the Use of Offender Assessment: A Path Toward Enhanced Public Safety

Moving Beyond Incarceration For Justice-involved Women : An Action Platform To Address Women s Needs In Massachusetts

Implementing a Risk/Need/Responsivity Framework into an Offender Management System. April 5, 2017

Planning & Implementation Guide

Debra A. Pinals, M.D. Principal Investigator David Smelson, Psy.D. Co-Principal Investigator David Goldstein, Peer Specialist Charles Delaney, MLA,

DRUG POLICY TASK FORCE

Santa Clara County s Implementation of Assembly Bill 109

Nebraska LB605: This bill is designed to reduce prison overcrowding and allows for alternatives to incarceration like CAM.

Study of Recidivism, Race, Gender, and Length of Stay

Mental Health Diversion and Emerging Best Practices. Senate Criminal Justice Committee B. J. Wagner, MS May 17, 2016

Phil Klassen Vice-President, Medical Affairs, Ontario Shores Assistant Professor, University of Toronto

A National Portrait of Treatment in the Criminal Justice System

Recommendation #1: Expand Drug Courts

Transcription:

Dauphin County MH/ID Mental Health and Forensic Initiatives PRESENTATION TO RCPA SEPTEMBER 29, 2016

Agenda 2 Dauphin County Demographics History of MH and Forensic Efforts in Dauphin County SAMHSA Jail Diversion Grant 2006 BJA Targeted Expansion Grant 2009 Collaboration lessons learned Serving people with challenges lesson learned Sustaining Infrastructure Overview of recent Dauphin County population study Challenging assumptions Treatment and support challenges

Dauphin County Demographics 3 271,453 - County Population ~1,100 - Mean Daily Prison Population 72,248 - # of HealthChoices Unique Members FY 15-16 12,945 - # of HealthChoices Members receiving BH Service FY 15-16 5,333 - # County Funded MH Program Consumers Served FY 15-16

Starting Point: Pre SAMHSA Jail Diversion Grant in 2005 4 Performed a chart review for 32 inmates out of approximately 250 inmates with MH diagnosis (13% Sample) Class of Charge Summary Misdemeanor Felony Parole Violation 2 13 6 11 6.25% 40.63% 18.75% 34.38% Episodes of Incarceration Per Inmate 1 to 3 4 to 6 7 to 9 10 to 15 Over 15 7 8 6 7 4 21.88% 25.00% 18.75% 21.88% 12.50%

SAMHSA Jail Diversion Grant Data (June 2007 Feb 2010) 5 Referral Source: Magisterial District Judges 31% Pretrial Services 16% Public Defenders & DA 19% Probation / Prison / Police 18% Others 16% Number of Jail Days of Enrollees 7,983 - Mean 50 days Number of Jail Days Saved 39,600 - Mean 249 days

Diversion Grant Outcomes + One Year (159 people) 6 Arrests were tracked from two years prior to referral for the program and while in the program, and up to two years after discharge from the program: Number of Arrests 2 Years Prior to Referral - 374 Average Number of Arrests 2 Years Prior to Referral - 2.35 Number of Arrests After Enrollment + 2 Years - 97 Average Number of Arrests After Enrollment + 2 Years - 0.6 Data for individuals in the MH Jail Diversion Program who were discharged for 2 years or longer Number of Individuals - 49 Number of Arrests - 104 Average Number of Arrests Per Person - 2.12 Number of Individuals Arrested While Enrolled - 11 (22%) Number of Arrests While Enrolled - 15 Average Number of Arrests Per Person While Enrolled - 1.36 Number of Individuals Arrested - 15 (30%) Number of Arrests - 26 Average Number of Arrests Per Person - 1.73 Number of Individuals Not Arrested - 34 (70%)

BJA Grant Objectives 7 MH/ID awarded BJA Category II Grant 2009 Sustain core components of existing SAMHSA Jail Diversion Grant for people with SMI Key Components of BJA Grant Develop a Forensic Re-Entry Program for persons with SMI Develop a Mental Health Court Expand Jail Diversion target population to persons with MI and MDJ level court decision Diversion = Substantially reducing # of days in prison MH Courts = Substantially mitigating sentence, enhanced MH treatment and court coordination, reduced parole length, long term success in diminishing criminal antecedents Re-Entry = Substantially increasing community integration options for people not eligible for Diversion or MH Courts either due to nature of crime/length of sentence, prior criminal history, or maxing out of DCP or State Corrections

Forensic Overview 2006 to 2014 8 Dauphin County Forensic Program Data 2005 to 2014 MH COURT MH JAIL DIVERSION MH REENTRY Total Number of Participants 119 Total Number of Participants 58 Total Number of Participants 42 Total Number Discharged 62 Total Number Discharged 18 Total Number Discharged 13 Total Number Graduated 51 Total Successful Diversions 38 Total Successfully Reentered 18 Graduation Rate 51/113 45.1% Diversion Success Rate: 38/56, 67.8% Re-entry Success Rate 18/31, 58% Individuals Still in Program 5 Ind. Moved to New Program 1 Ind. Moved to New Program 11 **Treatment Works, People Recover** Referrals All Programs Total Accepted (3 Programs)- 219 Total Denied - 350 Total Referrals - 569

Collaboration Lessons Learned 9 Establish Key Partnerships- President Judge, MDJs, District Attorney, Public Defender, Prison, Adult Probation, Pre-Trial Services, Court Administration, Law Enforcement, MH Agencies, and Community Agencies Police Training Programs (CIT and MH First Aid) Boundary Spanner MH Forensic Coordinator housed in Pretrial Services Mental health system and providers improve forensic system knowledge Establish credibility with courts and criminal justice system Stratifying forensic collaboration Criminal history eligibility Voluntary treatment participation Developing and maintaining strategies for offenders not eligible for diversion

Challenging Population to Serve 10 Develop Forensic Expertise Forensic ICM /Blended ACT Forensic Residential Program Co-Occurring (MH and D&A) Disorder Strategies Trauma Informed Treatment Approaches Seeking Safety DBT Trauma CBT RECOVERY: Treatment, Housing, Employment, Peers, Positive Interactions

Sustaining Infrastructure 11 Monitor programs, processes, collaboration participation Big group of people that have to maintain strategies and focus on this population Not always the priority of the criminal justice system or the courts Provider staff turnover.train, retrain, retrain and retrain again Maintain strong partnerships especially with Pretrial Services and Adult Probation HealthChoices funding for Housing Support funds Expanding Co-Occurring treatment options Using diversion CRR programs effectively

Intercept Graphic 12

Challenges Ahead 13 Research now says Criminogenic Risk and Mental Illness Simple Logic Model: Not So Simple Mental Health Symptoms lead to criminalization Expand Mental Health Services Criminalization of persons with Mental Illness will Decrease BUT. more mental health services do not necessarily decrease the percentage of persons with mental illness in jail (Fisher 2000) Steadman 2013; Rotter, 2015 Criminogenic Risk Factors: The Risk-Need-Responsivity Paradigm Risk Factor History of antisocial behavior Antisocial personality pattern Antisocial cognition Antisocial attitudes Family and/or marital discord Poor school and/or work performance Few leisure or recreation activities Substance abuse Source: Andrews (2006)

Recent Dauphin County Prison Study 14 Dec. 15 Jan. 16 Feb 16 Total % DCP Admissions 419 375 307 1101 100.0 Open Base Service Unit (BSU) 26 23 7 56 5.1 BSU Closed Within 3 Years 43 42 31 116 10.5 Not Registered 350 310 269 934 84.4 NATIONAL DATA OVERVIEW Gen Pub State Prison Jail Probation/Parole Serious Mental Disorders 5.4% 16% 17% 7 9%

CRIMINAL CHARGE PROFILE OPEN AND CLOSED Open # Open % Closed# Closed % Violent 22 39% 33 28% Non Violent 34 61% 83 72% Total 56 116 Felony Subtotal 24 43% 60 52% Misdemeanor Subtotal 30 54% 50 43% Other 2 3% 6 5% Total 56 116 15 LENGTH OF STAY* OPEN AND CLOSED Open # Open % Closed # Closed % < 30 days 21 37.5% 33 28.5% 30 to 60 Days 10 17.9% 41 35.3% > 60 days 25 44.6% 42 36.2% MEDIAN 51.4 58.5 * Maximum length of stay for this report is 122 days based on earliest admission 12/1/15 and data cut off 3/31/16

Recidivism Population 16 Open % Closed % No Prior Arrest 3 5.4% 7 6.0% Prior not within 2 years 10 17.9% 26 22.4% Prior within 2 years 43 76.7% 83 71.6% # of Priors within 2 Years 6 5 4.3% 5 1 1.7% 3 2.6% 4 4 7.1% 6 5.2% 3 5 8.9% 16 13.7% 2 7 12.5% 18 15.5% 1 26 46.4% 35 30.2% 0 13 23.2% 33 28.5% Total 56 100% 116 100%

Meeting the Challenge 17 Address the underlying trauma that can result in adults with antisocial thinking and behavior, poor relationships, lack of community engagement Increase employment skills, housing stability, treatment engagement Address co-occurring disorders Explore how to Use an integrated approach consistent with effective practice to provide services that address individuals behavioral health and criminogenic needs, and targets those needs that are most likely leading to criminal justice involvement (e.g., cognitive behavioral treatment, or CBT, targeted to criminogenic risks, such as Reasoning and Rehabilitation and Thinking for a Change) Alex M Blandford, MHP CHES, Fred Osher, MD

Questions / Comments 18 Daniel E. Eisenhauer, Administrator Dauphin County MH/ID Program 100 Chestnut Street, 1 st Floor Harrisburg, PA 17101 deisenhauer@dauphinc.org (717) 780-7049