Status of Activities on BPA

Similar documents
DANIEL R. DOERGE U.S. Food and Drug Administration National Center for Toxicological Research Jefferson, AR

DANIEL R. DOERGE U.S. Food and Drug Administration National Center for Toxicological Research Jefferson, AR

Comments from PlasticsEurope

A Cooperative (U01) Bisphenol A (BPA) Research Consortium Kembra Howdeshell, Ph.D.

3-MCPD and glycidol and their esters

Consortium Linking Academic and Regulatory Insights on BPA Toxicity (CLARITY-BPA): Core Study

Evaluation of EFSA s new Scientific Opinion on Bisphenol A

BISPHENOL A (BPA) RISK MANAGEMENT APPROACH: PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FOR BPA-HEALTH COMPONENT DECEMBER, 2018 HEALTH CANADA.

Minutes of EFSA-ANSES Expert Meeting on Bisphenol A (BPA) Art. 30 Regulation (EC) No 178/2002 Held on 3 December 2014, Paris (France)

FAQs on bisphenol A in consumer products

Dose response relationships: biological and modeling aspects

CLARITY-BPA: A Novel Approach to Studying Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Retha Newbold

Current status of Benchmark Dose Modeling for 3-Monochloropropane-1,2-diol (3-MCPD)

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Conflict of Interest Disclosure

Food and Chemical Toxicology

Part 2. Chemical and physical aspects

EFSA working group on BPA assessment protocol. Ursula Gundert-Remy Chair of the EFSA Working Group BPA assessment Protocol

EPA Health Advisory for PFOA and PFOS Drinking Water

SAB Report to the Board of the Glass Packaging Institute

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids (CEF) 2, 3

Dithianon DITHIANON (180)

APPLICATION FOR AUTHORISATION: ESTABLISHING REFERENCE DNELs FOR 1-BROMOPROPANE (1-BP)

Risk Assessment of Chemicals in Foods- WHO Principles and Methods

The use of dose response data for risk assessment

Case Study Application of the WHO Framework for Combined Exposures. Presented by: M.E. (Bette) Meek University of Ottawa

- draft scientific opinion -

APPLICATION FOR AUTHORISATION: ESTABLISHING REFERENCE DNELS FOR BBP

Bisphenol A (BPA) in Plastics and Possible Human Health Effects

5.36 THIOPHANATE-METHYL (077)

Poly-fluoroalkyl substances (PFASs), also called perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs)

Committee for Risk Assessment (RAC) Committee for Socio-economic Analysis (SEAC)

COLLECTIVE EXPERT APPRAISAL: SUMMARY AND CONCLUSIONS

CLARITY-BPA : A Model for Integration of Guideline and Academic Studies. R. Thomas Zoeller University of Massachusetts Amherst

Statement on the ANSES reports on bisphenol A 1

NHANES Update on Mercury Northeast Regional Mercury Conference

TTC NON-CANCER ORAL DATABASES

Overview of US EPA Assessment Activities for Perfluorooctanoic Acid (PFOA) and Perfluorooctane Sulfonate (PFOS)

Step by Step Approach for GPS Risk Assessment

International Safety Assessment of Sweeteners

To: National Toxicology Program (NTP); Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR)

5.2 ATRAZINE TOXICOLOGY

5.17 PENTHIOPYRAD (253)

5.15 HEXYTHIAZOX (176)

Trilateral meeting on perchlorate risk assessment Trilateral meeting report of the meeting on , Parma. (Agreed on )

BPA Risk assessment work plan. Efsa, 29-30, October Jean Nicolas Ormsby (DER,anses)

STUDIES TO EVALUATE THE SAFETY OF RESIDUES OF VETERINARY DRUGS IN HUMAN FOOD: GENERAL APPROACH TO ESTABLISH AN ACUTE REFERENCE DOSE

Dose and Response for Chemicals

Distinguishing between Mode and Mechanism of Action

In a Plastic World. Facilitator Instructions contributed by Meghan McNamara. Reflection. Skill:

Surveillance and official control of food contact materials in Cyprus The case of Bisphenol A

Biomarkers and risk assessment for Deoxynivalenol

The EFSA scientific opinion on lead in food

Zinc: Issues and Update. Craig Boreiko, Ph.D. Ottawa May 2008

Captan (Pesticides) Summary. Risk assessment report. Food Safety Commission of Japan. Conclusion in Brief

European Public MRL assessment report (EPMAR)

FDA Activities on Acrylamide, Furan, and Perchlorate

Endocrine disruptors: Science for science's sake, science for health protection

Chemical food safety in the U.S. analysis of FDA s scientific basis for assessing chemical risk. Tom Neltner October 9, 2014

The terms used in these Directives are consistent with those defined by the Committee.

Welcome and introduction to EFSA

CONTRIBUTED ARTICLES Weight of the Evidence Evaluation of Low-Dose Reproductive and Developmental Effects of Bisphenol A

5.3 AZINPHOS METHYL (002)

Risk Assessment Report on Tris (nonylphenyl)phosphite (TNPP)

Human Health Risk Assessment Overview [For the APS/OPP Roundtable]

SAFE AT DIFFERENT APPLICATIONS AND USE PATTERNS. Polycarbonate beverage containers. Typical migration level less than 0,005mg/kg (5ppb)

Synthetic EDCs at the present human exposure ARE NO RISK for human health Prof. Dan Dietrich University of Konstanz 1

A Weight of Evidence Approach to Cancer Assessment. Alan R Boobis Imperial College London

The European Commission non-food Scientific Committees Scientific Committee on consumer safety - SCCS

COMMITTEE FOR MEDICINAL PRODUCTS FOR VETERINARY USE

The "Cocktail-effect" Do pesticides play a role?

Cycloxydim CYCLOXYDIM (179)

Regarding Establishment of a Uniform Limit in a Positive List System concerning Agricultural Chemicals Residues in Food etc.

Outline: risk assessment. What kind of environmental risks do we commonly consider? 11/19/2013. Why do we need chemical risk assessment?

Health Canada s Safety Assessment Process for Sugar Substitutes

aaaaaaaa Information Document on the Proposal to Reinstate Saccharin for Use as a Sweetener in Foods in Canada

European public MRL assessment report (EPMAR)

DISCUSSION GROUP 3. Mechanism of carcinogenicity. EFSA Scientific Colloquium on Acrylamide carcinogenicity, 22/23 May

Cancer thresholds, Cohort of Concern and other excluded substance groups

Diethylstilbestrol (DES) General Information

COMMITTEE FOR VETERINARY MEDICINAL PRODUCTS

Ausgabe: Mai 2002 geändert Oktober Nonylphenol, verzweigt (CAS-NR.: ) Nonylphenol (CAS-NR.: )

Question 1. Can EFSA explain how the small number of boys followed up may have affected the results?

Everyday Chemical Exposures and Breast Cancer: Why are we concerned? What can we do? Janet M. Gray, Ph.D. Vassar College Breast Cancer Fund

Rationale for TEL, WES and NOAEC values for ethanedinitrile, Draft 1

Provisional Translation Original: Japanese

Mathematical Framework for Health Risk Assessment

BPA and Health Is Any Exposure Safe?

ToxStrategies, Inc. and Summit Toxicology

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids (CEF) 2, 3

Background paper on the risk assessment of Bisphenol A

Iron. (2) Microminerals

GSC CODEX MESSAGE CCFA48/2016/25

Dioxin toxicology. David R Bell

Summary of Initial Risk Assessment Report. Inorganic cyanide compounds (excluding complex salts and cyanates)

The Burden of Foodborne Chemicals

AB 1319 (Butler) OPPOSE Set for hearing 4/26/11 Assembly Environmental Safety & Toxic Materials Cmte.

Texas Commission on Environmental Quality

Draft Bisphenol A (BPA) hazard assessment protocol

Transcription:

Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe Status of Activities on BPA at International Level Anna F. Castoldi FIP Unit Meeting with National Experts Parma, 29-30 October 2012

International activities on BPA: Overview WHO US Canada Australia New Zealand Japan 2

Activities on BPA: FAO-WHO, 2010-11 BPA exposure assessment (in μg/kg bw/day) Sub-population with the highest dietary intake is that of infants of 0-6 months being fed liquid formula out of PC bottles: 2.4 (mean) and 4.5 (95 th percentile). Exposure did not exceed: 0.7 (mean) and 1.9 (max) for children >3 yrs 0.4-1.4 (mean) and 1,0-4.2 (max) for adults. For most subgroups exposure to BPA from non-food sources was at least one order of magnitude lower than that from food (limited data). Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe 3

Activities on BPA: FAO-WHO, 2010-11 BPA Hazard & risk characterization For many end-points, points of departure (PODs) are much higher than human exposure. NO health concern. Some emerging new end-points (sex-specific neurodevelopment, anxiety, preneoplastic changes in mammary glands and prostate in rats, impaired sperm parameters) in a few studies show PODs close to the estimated human exposure. Difficult interpretation of these findings & high uncertainty on the validity and relevance of these data: it is premature to realistically estimate human risk. Data gaps and recommendations for future research Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe 4

Activities on BPA: USA Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe 5

Activities on BPA: USA 2008 NTP monograph More research into the potential toxic effects of BPA on fetuses, infants and children to fill data gaps Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe 6

Activities on BPA: USA Inter-laboratory method validation GLP-compliant 2 year-tox study in rats - Prenatal exposure - Standard & non standard endpoints Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe Biomonitoring studies in specific populations From Birnbaum et al., EHP 2012 7

Activities on BPA: USA NCTR-FDA s Research Findings (support from NIEHS & NTP) The level of BPA from food that could be passed from pregnant mothers to the fetus is so low that it could not be measured. Pregnant rodents fed 100-1,000 times more BPA than people p are exposed to through food: no detection of the active form of BPA in the fetus 8 hrs after the mother s exposure. Exposure to BPA in human infants is 84-92% less than previously estimated. Mathematical models were built to predict the fate of BPA in human body. They showed that t BPA is rapidly metabolized and eliminated i through h feces and urine, without bio-accumulating. The NCTR research has not found evidence of BPA toxicity at low doses in rodent studies, including doses that are still above human exposure levels. Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe 8

Activities on BPA: Canada Health Canada BPA surveillance activities Updated BPA exposure assessment from food sources Research activities http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/fn-an/securit/packag-emball/bpa/index-eng.php 9

Activities on BPA: Canada Surveys (since 2008) Concentrations of BPA were measured in: General population Food canned drink products canned food products bottled water products soft drink and beer products Infant Food canned liquid infant formula canned powdered infant formula baby food pre-packaged glass jars with metal lids 85 samples of infant formula from HC Total Diet samples HC Total Diet samples Based on these surveys: probabilistic assessment of dietary exposure to BPA, both for the general population and for infants of different ages. 10

Probabilistic dietary exposure to BPA for infants of different age groups A probabilistic exposure assessment was conducted by randomly applying the BPA concentrations measured through the surveys of canned and bottled foods, as well as all food composites from the Total Diet Study, to the relevant food consumption rates reported by each individual. For each survey respondent, BPA exposure from all foods was summed to give an estimate of the distribution for total dietary BPA exposure within a population. 500 different exposure scenarios were generated for each individual, from which mean exposure estimates were calculated for each agesex group. 11

Activities on BPA: Canada Health Canada: 2012 BPA dietary exposure Age group Mean 95 th (95% CI) (μg/kg bw/day) 0-1 month 0.083 0.814 (0.772, 1.142) 2-3 months 0.143 1.159159 (1.004, 2696) 4-7 months 0.164 0.737 (0.713. 0.982) 8-12 months 0.092092 0.373 (0.360, 0.408) 1-3 years 0.106 0.557 (0.536, 0.620) 4-8 years 0.078078 0.415 Adults 0.055 0.259 These figures align with exposure estimates from population-based biomonitoring studies. 12

Activities on BPA: Canada 2012 dietary exposure assessment: on average 3 fold-lower Due lower to uncertainties than that of in 2008. some low dose animal studies, the Government of Canada recommends Based the application the overall of the weight ALARA of principle evidence, (as HC low as continues reasonably to conclude achievable) that t current to limit tdietary BPA exposure of to BPA infants through and food newborns packaging from uses FCM, is specifically not expected from to pose pre-packaged a health risk infant to the formula general (only population, food source including for newborns and young children. babies). This conclusion is consistent with those of food regulatory bodies in the US, EU and Japan. 13

Activities on BPA: Australia-New Zealand Food Standards FSANZ FSANZ recently undertook a survey of BPA in food and drinks in Australia to determine exposure to BPA from packaging materials. No detectable levels of BPA in infant formula, including infant formula made in BPA containing i bottles. Very low levels of BPA (parts per billion range) in a small number of samples, mainly canned foods. Dietary exposure estimate to BPA Australians of all ages are exposed to extremely low levels (in the range of parts per billion to parts per trillion). Liver enzymes are very efficient at combining with BPA, making 99.9% 9% of it non-toxic, and it s excreted in the urine. 14

Activities on BPA: Australia-New Zealand Food Standards FSANZ FSANZ has carefully considered the toxicological database for BPA and concurs with the hazard assessment and TDI of 0.05 mg/kg bw/day. FSANZ considered the possible risks of BPA and they remain convinced that the weight of evidence, obtained from an extensive range of safety studies, indicates that BPA is safe for the whole population at the very low levels of current exposure. FSANZ acknowledges unresolved uncertainties in the data on BPA, and notes that further studies are currently being conducted in the US to address these uncertainties. 15

Activities on BPA: Japan Institute of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology (AIST) July 2011: Updated Hazard Assessment of BPA Critical endpoints: Hepatotoxicity and nephrotoxicity (NTP,1985; Tyl et al, 2008) Lowest BMDL10 were found for centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy (15 mg/kg/d) and nephropathy (90 mg/kg/d) in mice from the 2 generation reproductive study of Tyl A factor of 5 was further applied to BMDLs to extrapolate data from short to long term exposure NOAELs. NOAEL: 3 mg/kg bw/day for centrilobular hepatocyte hypertrophy UF: 25 2.5 for inter-species differences (1 for TK and 2.5 for dynamics) 10 for intra-species differences 16

Activities on BPA: Japan Institute of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology (AIST) Exposure assessment (95th percentile, in µg/kg bw/d) max in 1-6 yr old children: 3.9 (males) - 4.1 (females) Adults: 0.037-0.064 (men) & 0.043-0.075 (women) MOE (using data at the 95th percentile) 730-770 for 1-6 yr old children 40,000-81,000 for adults The AIST concluded: These values were much larger than the MOE (25) that was presumed to cause health effects in humans or the conventional and conservative MOE (100), and thus the risk of BPA with regard to human health was believed to be very small. 17

Thank you 18

90-day study design (Barry Delclos, FDA) Animal model: SD rat from NCTR colony Treatment groups Control 7 BPA low doses: 2.5, 8, 25, 80, 260, 840, 2700 μg/kg/day 2 BPA high dose groups: 100000, 300000 μg/kg bw/day) 2 Ethynyl estradiol (EE2): 0.5, 5 μg/kg bw/day Exposure: continuous - in utero & postnatal - until sacrifice in utero: GD 6-21 dams, gavage, 0.3%carboxymethylcellulose postnatal: direct oral dosing of pups (gavage): PND 1-90 Endpoints: serum levels at Cmax on PND 4, 21, 80, general dpo ts se u e e s at C a o,, 80, ge e a toxicity signs (viability, bw, organ weight, etc), clinical chemistry, organ histopathology 19

90-day study results (Barry Delclos, FDA) EE2 groups Females (both doses): multiple dose-related effects - weights of immature reproductive organs -delayed puberty -altered serum clinical chemistry -altered estrous cycles and reproductive tract morphology. Males high dose: multiple adverse effects on reproductive organs and delayed puberty onset low dose: mammary gland hyperplasia (only effect clearly observed) Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe 20

90-day study results (Barry Delclos, FDA) BPA 300,000 μg/kg/d: as for EE2, in both sexes multiple reproductive organ effects, serum chemistry changes and mild renal effects; in both sexes body weight gain depression (not seen in EE2) 100,000 000 μg/kg/d: changes in serum thyroid hormones ( T3 at PND 5), gestational weight gain, aberrant estrous cycle. 2.5-2,700 μg/kg/d: sporadic pathological effects with no consistent dose response in incidence or severity. Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe 21

90-day study results (Barry Delclos, FDA) Ovarian histopathology Antral follicle depletion Corpus luteum depletion EE2: strong effects at 0.5 5 μg/kg bw/day BPA: severe effects only at 300,000 μg/kg g bw/day ------------------------------------ Neoplasms & BPA - None in males -1 ductal neoplasm at 2.5 μg BPA/kg bw/day in females Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe 22

Activities on BPA: USA FDA -Report on 90 day study. Publication date? - 2-year cancer bioassay: study to start in the summer, data available in min 3 yrs - Biomonitoring studies in specific populations: hospitalized babies, cashiers (dermal exposure), etc By 31 March: FDA reply to the petition of the Natural Resources Defense Council to prohibit the use of BPA in human food and food packaging Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe 23

Activities on BPA: USA NCTR-FDA s The research Research has Findings not found (with evidence support from of NIEHS BPA toxicity & NTP) at low doses in rodent studies, including doses that are still above human exposure levels. Exposure to BPA in human infants is 84-92% less than previously estimated. Mathematical models were built to predict the fate of BPA in human body. They showed that BPA is rapidly metabolized and eliminated through feces and urine, without bio-accumulating. The level of BPA from food that could be passed from pregnant mothers to the fetus is so low that it could not be measured. Experiments in pregnant rodents fed 100-1,000 times more BPA than people are exposed to through food: no detection of the Committed active since 2002 form of BPA in the fetus 8 hrs after the mother s to ensuring that Europe s food is safe exposure 24

25

Activities on BPA: FAO-WHO Expert meeting (2-5 Nov 2010) FAO-WHO Expert Meeting The sub-population with the highest dietary intake of BPA is that of infants of 0-6 months being fed liquid formula out of PC bottles: this accounts for 2.4 and 4.5 μg/kg bw/day (mean & 95 th percentile). Exposure (in μg BPA/kg bw per day) did not exceed 0.7 (mean) and 1.9 (max) for children >3 years, and 1.4 (mean) and 4.2 (max) for adults. For most subgroups BPA exposure from non-food sources was at least one order of magnitude lower than that from food. For many end-points, points of departure (POD) are much higher than human exposure. Hence, there is no health concern for these end-points. Some emerging new end-points (sex-specific neurodevelopment, anxiety, preneoplastic changes in mammary glands and prostate in rats, impaired sperm parameters) in a few studies show PODs close to the estimated human exposure. However, it is difficult to interpret these findings, taking into account all available kinetic data and current understanding of classical estrogenic activity. However, new studies indicate that BPA may also act through other mechanisms 26

Dietary exposure assessment FAO-WHO, 2011 Highest exposure for 0-6 month infants drinking liquid id formula out of PC bottles: -2.4 μg/kg bw/ day (mean) -4.5 μg/kg bw/day (95 th perc). Committed since 2002 to ensuring that Europe s food is safe 27