BRANDON REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER; WHIPPLE S PROCEDURE AND ESOPHAGECTOMY AUDIT

Similar documents
JOHN M UECKER, MD, FACS COMPLEX PANCREATICODUODENAL INJURIES

1. Epidemiology of Esophageal Cancer 2. Operative Strategies 3. Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy 4. Video

Surgical Privileges Form: General surgery. Clinical Privileges Request. Date:.. Recommended (For committee use) Under Supervision

Long Term Follow-up. 6 Month 1 Year Annual enter year #: What is the assessment date: / / Unknown. Is the patient alive? Yes No

How the ANZGOSA audit can benefit your practice: a look at GIST surgery from an Australian and NZ perspective. Aravind Suppiah; Sarah K.

Jejunostomy after oesophagectomy, how and why I do it

Surgical Workload, Outcome and Research Database: V1.1

DATA REPORT. August 2014

Aliu Sanni MD SUNY Downstate Medical Center August 16, 2012

Surgical Privileges Form: General surgery. Clinical Privileges Request. Date:.. Recommended (For committee use) Not Recommended (For committee use)

MINIMALLY INVASIVE ESOPHAGECTOMY FOR CANCER: where do we stand?

AATS Focus on Thoracic Surgery: Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: Are We Still Getting Better in 2017?

Reinterventions belong to complications

Robotic Surgery for Esophageal Cancer

Appendix 5. EFSUMB Newsletter. Gastroenterological Ultrasound

Case Scenario 1. Discharge Summary

DIGESTIVE SYSTEM SURGICAL PROCEDURES December 22, 2015 (effective March 1, 2016) INTESTINES (EXCEPT RECTUM) Asst Surg Anae

THE CRITICAL COMPLCATIONS AND MANAGEMENTS AFTER PANCREATIC SURGERY 2013/12/21

World Journal of Colorectal Surgery

The Binational Colorectal Cancer Audit. A/Prof Paul McMurrick Head, Cabrini Monash University Dept of Surgery 2017

FTS Oesophagectomy: minimal research to date 3,4

INFORMATION ON PANCREATIC HEAD AND PERIAMPULLARY CANCER

HIPEC Controversies in the Indications and Application of Regional Chemotherapy for Peritoneal Surface Malignancies

Complex pancreatico- duodenal injuries. Elmin Steyn Head, Division of Surgery Faculty of Health Sciences Stellenbosch University

SETTING Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center. RESPONSIBLE PARTY Haiquan Chen MD.

Management of Esophageal Cancer: Evidence Based Review of Current Guidelines. Madhuri Rao, MD PGY-5 SUNY Downstate Medical Center

Surgery for Gastric and Oesophageal Cancer

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY DELINEATION OF PRIVILEGES FOR GENERAL SURGERY

Prof. Dr. Ahmed ElGeidie Professor of General surgery GEC Dr. Ahmed Abdelrafee

Gastrointestinal Feedings Post Op: What s the deal on beginning oral feedings?

Douglas G. Adler MD. ACG Regional Postgraduate Course - Nashville, TN Copyright 2013 American College of Gastroenterology

The Whipple Operation Illustrations

Locally Advanced Colon Cancer. Feiran Lou MD. MS. Richmond University Medical Center Department of Surgery

Demographics. MBSAQIP Case Number: *ACS NSQIP Case Number: *LMRN: *DOB: / / *Gender: Male Female

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Endoscopic Treatment of Luminal Perforations and Leaks

GENERAL SURGERY Jill Attia, NP

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

National Emergency Laparotomy Audit. Help Box Text

Oesophagogastric Cancer The Patient s Pathway

Management of Pancreatic Fistulae

Navigators Lead the Way

Trauma. Neck trauma zones. Neck Injuries 1/3/2018. Basic principles A ; Airway B ; Breathing C ; Circulation D ; Disability E ; Exposure

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy- Valuable. Jayer Chung, MD University of Colorado Health Sciences Center December 11, 2006

Pancreatico-Duodenal Trauma: Drain, Debride, Divert, Despair BACKGROUND EPIDEMIOLOGY 9/11/2018

The ABC s of Chest Trauma

Management of biliary injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy N. Dayes Kings County Hospital Center & Long Island College Hospital 8/19/2010

Surgery and Crohn s. Crohn s Disease 70 % Why Operate? Complications of Disease. The Gastrointestinal Tract. Surgery for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Obstructive Jaundice; A Clinical Study of Malignant Causes.

Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery About Pancreatic Surgery A guide for patients and relatives

The Learning Curve for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Outcomes Report: Accountability Measures and Quality Improvements

Complicated surgical infections

Surgical Management of Pancreatic Cancer

Geoffrey Axiak M.Sc. Nursing (Manch.), B.Sc. Nursing, P.G. Dip. Nutrition & Dietetics Clinical Nutrition Practice Nurse

Q3 Sex Male Female. Q9b Pre-operative PPOSSUM Morbidity: Mortality:

PANCREAS DUCTAL ADENOCARCINOMA PDAC

Mayo Clinic Interactive Surgery Symposium 2018 Program Schedule

In any operation. Indications. Anaesthesia. Position of the patient. Incision. Steps of the operation. Complications.

GALLBLADDER CANCER. Lidie M. Lajoie MD Downstate Surgery M&M July 21, 2011

Current outcomes of emergency large bowel surgery

E09 PEG. Expires end of March 2018 VITALITY.CO.UK

PANCREATIC CANCER GUIDELINES

General Surgery PURPLE SERVICE MUHC-RVH Site

Chapter 14: Training in Radiology. DDSEP Chapter 1: Question 12

WHEN To Initiate Parenteral Nutrition A Frequent Question With New Answers

Colorectal Surgery. Patient Care. Goals and Objectives

Kaiser Oakland Urology

Michael A. Choti, MD, FACS Department of Surgery Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD

Surgical Management of CBD Injury Jin Seok Heo

Cholangiocarcinoma (Bile Duct Cancer)

Case discussion. Anastomotic leakage. intern superviser

Repeat Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery after Primary Single Incision Laparoscopic Surgery for Colorectal Disease

Contents Optum360, LLC i

The Royal Marsden. Surgery for Gastric and GE Junction Cancer: primary palliative when and where? William Allum Consultant Surgeon

Technical Guidance for Surgical Workload Audit and Research Database: Cholecystectomy V1.0

Penetrating abdominal trauma clinical view. Ari Leppäniemi, MD Department of Abdominal Surgery Meilahti hospital University of Helsinki Finland

Pancreas & Biliary System. Dr. Vohra & Dr. Jamila

Colostomy & Ileostomy

The Royal Marsden. Surgery for Gastric and GE Junction Cancer: primary palliative when and where? William Allum

World Journal of Colorectal Surgery

Pancreaticoduodenectomy

ANZ Emergency Laparotomy Audit Quality Improvement (ANZELA-QI) Pilot Collaboration between RACS, ANZCA, GSA, NZAGS, ASA, NZSA, ACEM, CICM

2014 Deleted CPT Codes

Esophageal Perforation

Having an operation on the pancreas

Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy

Colorectal Laparoscopic Standards and Coding Protocols July 2015 v2.0

General'Surgery'Service'

Colorectal non-inflammatory emergencies

NEPHRECTOMY AUDIT. OCTOBER 1998-SEPTEMBER 2005 Dr. Sanjeev Bandi MBBS., FRCSI., FRACS(Urology) Mater Misericordiae Hospital, Mackay, Qld 4740

Determining the Optimal Surgical Approach to Esophageal Cancer

Pediatric ER Half-day Rounds October 12, 2011 Dr. Karen Bailey

INTRA-THORACIC AND INTRA-ABDO-MINAL PERFORATION OF THE COLON IN TRAUMATIC DIAPHRAGMATIC


APPLYING ENHANCED RECOVERY PRINCIPLES: EARLY TESTING IN UPPER GI CANCER

Form 1: Demographics

Transcription:

BRANDON REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER; WHIPPLE S PROCEDURE AND ESOPHAGECTOMY AUDIT By: Amy Cisyk Home for the Summer Program July, 2016 Brandon, Manitoba Supervisor: Dr. Marvin Goossen

Whipple s Procedure Audit The outline of this report follows the December 2011 Esophagectomy Audit by Robin Smith. Overview: A review was conducted of the 31 Whipple s Procedures performed at the Brandon Regional Health Centre from March 2011 July 2016. All of these surgeries were performed by Doctor Dhalla. Approximately 2/3 rds of the patients were male, with an average age of 66 years. The principle pre-surgical diagnoses were cancer of the pancreas, ampulla and/or bile duct. The average ICU stay was 5.7 days and the average total hospital stay was 28.5 days. The surgical mortality rate was 6.5% with two in hospital deaths at days 6 and 84 post-operation. Two patients currently remain in care. Mean survival times for those deceased and currently alive are 1.27 and 1.41 years respectively. Patient Demographics 64.5% male, 35.5% female Average age - 66.4 years Median age - 68 years Pre-Surgical Diagnosis Diagnosis Cases CA of Pancreas 10 CA of Head of Pancreas 6 CA of Bile Duct 5 CA of Pancreas + Bile Duct 5 CA of Ampulla 4 CA of Pancreas + Ampulla 1 Total 31 Page 2 of 11

Surgical Type and Duration Whipple s Procedure Audit Procedure N Duration (h) Estimated Blood Loss (ml) Stay in ICU Stay in Hospital Reoperation following surgery (%) Post-op mortality (days) Whipple's 4 26.5 1/4 (25.0) 897 (n=4) 6:24 650 Procedure 2 Whipple s + PEG 11 22.3 3/11 (27.3) 279 (n=3) J-tube 5:37 386 placement 2.1 Whipple s + 4* 17.8 0/4 (0.0) 760 (n=1) Excision of 6:24 388 Portal Vein 2 Total 6* 36.8 2/6 (33.3) 338 (n=2) Pancreatectomy with 7:35 1050 Splenectomy 8.8 Other 7 6:51 575 12.6 38.9 3/7 (42.9) 77 (n=3) * One case is included in both categories (ie. Total Pancreatectomy with Splenectomy and Segmental Excision of Portal Vein) Other category includes Whipple s Procedures with one of the following; Hartmann's procedure, resection of common hepatic duct with hepaticojejunostomy, subtotal colectomy, VAC dessing, segmental colectomywith VAC dressing, exploratory laparotomy Page 3 of 11

Major Surgical Complications Whipple s Procedure Audit 16/31 cases (52%) had no intra-surgical or post-surgical complications. Pre-operative complications: o None reported Intra-operative o Patient required packed cells (x4) o Hole in small bowel where stent had been placed o Marked edema requiring VAC dressing (x2) o Patient in hyper-dynamic state, possible sepsis o J-tube connected before it was fed, failed to place the flange o Tear in spleen Post-operative Complications: o Ileus o Peritonitis o Ischemic colon, ischemic omentum o JP drain leakage requiring ongoing suction and clamping o J-tube curled up and fell out dislodged leaking stomach contents into wound o Nausea requiring tube feed o Seroma (x2) o Sepsis o Liver abscesses, renal failure, respiratory failure o Gastrocutaneous fistula o Bleed Return to OR 7 cases returned to the OR for the following reasons: Redo enteroanastomosis, VAC dressing Segmental colectomy, VAC dressing (x2) Right hemicolectomy, drainage of retroperitoneum, VAC dressing. 2 nd return; high-output ileostomy with placement of retroperitoneum drain. 3 rd ; J-tube replacement Place central line Cavity lavage, hemovac drain placed. 2 nd return; removal of PEG J tube, replacement of keofeed into efferent limb with NG tube placement. 3 rd return; upper endoscopy and clippings x4 Control bleeding. 2 nd return; packing liver with loose closure 2 cases returned to the GI unit for the following reasons: GI unit for replacement of PEG J-tube Upper GI endoscopy, swab for candida Page 4 of 11

Whipple s Procedure Audit Admission to ICU 30 of 31 cases were admitted to ICU (97%) with an average length of stay of 5.7 days. One case showed advanced metastatic disease, and therefore the Whipple s Procedure was converted to an Exploratory Laparotomy. This patient was admitted to recovery (length of stay in ICU of zero days). Surgical Mortality 2 of the 31 cases (6.5%) died post operatively while in care, one at 6 days and the other at 84 days. Length of Hospital Stay 27 of the 31 cases were discharged from the hospital with an average length of stay of 22.5 days, ranging from 8 thru 69 days. Of the remaining 4 cases, 2 died while in care and 2 are still admitted. Page 5 of 11

Whipple s Procedure Audit Long Term Survival Patient Status Average Survival Time (yrs) Range Surviving (n=18) 1.41 57 days 3.73 yrs Deceased (n=13) 1.27 6 days 1.91 yrs Period in Years Deceased 4.26 1.91 1.85 0.96 1.81 0.24 0.89 0.99 1.93 0.16 1.28 0.23 0.02 Surviving 3.73 3.69 3.54 1.91 1.81 1.79 1.68 1.54 1.52 0.94 0.92 0.83 0.32 0.29 0.27 0.26 0.22 0.16 Survival rate is based on the assumption that the absence of a death report in the patient s hospital record indicates survival. Histopathology 10 of 31 cases had both negative margins and negative lymph nodes. One case (designated N/A in the graphs) was metastatic and therefore did not have a histopathology report. Two cases were negative for malignancy. Page 6 of 11

Whipple s Procedure Audit *3 case were not staged, 1 case was not sampled due to metastatic disease Page 7 of 11

Esophagectomy Audit The outline of this report follows the December 2011 Esophagectomy Audit by Robin Smith. Overview: A review was conducted of the 14 esophagectomies performed at the Brandon Regional Health Centre from 2011 2016. All of these surgeries were performed by Doctors Dhalla, Carpenter, and Mohamed. The average age of the patients was at the time of surgery was 70 years, with 8/14 patients male. The principle pre-surgical diagnoses were cancer of the esophagus, cancer of the GE junction and Barrett s esophagus. Within the study group, Cancer Care data was acquired for 8 patients, with only 3 patients receiving neo-adjuvant therapy prior to their surgery. The predominant surgical method used was the Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy, followed by the transhiatal approach. With the exception of one patient (who spent 26 days in the ICU) the average ICU stay was 2.2 days. The average total hospital stay was 17.7 days. The surgical mortality rate was 7.1% with only a single 30-day mortality at 26 days. Mean survival times for those deceased and currently alive are 0.66 and 1.58 years respectively. Surgery by Surgeon Patient Demographics 57% male, 43% female Average age - 70.1 years Median age - 70.5 years Page 8 of 11

Esophagectomy Audit Pre-Surgical Diagnosis Diagnosis Ca of GE Junction 4 Ca of Esophagus 11 Barrett s Esophagus 6 Many cases had two diagnoses (eg. CA of Esophagus + Barrett s Esophagus) Pre-operative neo-adjuvant therapy Cancer care records were acquired for 8 of the 14 cases in this study. 3 of 8 patients received both preoperative chemotherapy and chemoradiation. The remaining 5 cases did not receive any neo-adjuvant/preoperative chemotherapy/radiation. Surgical Type and Duration Estimated Blood Loss (ml) Reoperation following surgery Post-op mortality (days) Procedure (Esophagectomy) N Duration (h) Stay in ICU Stay in Hospital Ivor-Lewis 8 5:32 175 (n=4) 2.1* 18.4 1 247 (n=2) Transhiatal 2 5:38 400 (n=1) 2.5 28.0 0 n=0 Other 4 2:55 200 (n=1) 2.3 13.5 1 226 (n=1) *Average excludes the one patient who stayed 26 days in the ICU Page 9 of 11

Major Surgical Complications Esophagectomy Audit 7 of 14 cases had no pre, intra or post-surgical complications. Pre-operative complications: o None Intra-operative o Scoliosis o Broken rib o Aortic bleed Post-operative Complications: o Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation o Atelectasis (x2) o Febrile (x2) o Hospital acquired UTI Return to OR Two cases returned to the OR for the following reasons: Repair aortic tear, hemothorax causing tamponade Balloon dilation of pylorus valve Admission to ICU 13 of 14 cases were admitted to ICU (92%). When excluding the outlier, the average length of stay of 2.2 days. Page 10 of 11

Esophagectomy Audit Length of Hospital Stay & Surgical Mortality 13 of 14 cases were discharged from the hospital with an average length of stay of 17.7 days, ranging from 11 through 29 days. 1 of 14 cases (7.1%) died in the post-operative period while in care at 26 days. Long Term Survival Patient Status Average Survival Time (yrs) Range Surviving (n=11) 1.58 89 days 3.66 yrs Deceased (n=3) 0.66 26 days 1.28 yrs Period in Years Surviving 3.66 2.60 2.19 1.97 1.67 1.47 1.27 1.17 0.61 0.54 0.24 Deceased 1.28 0.62 0.07 Survival rate is based on the assumption that the absence of a death repot in the patient s hospital record indicates survival. Page 11 of 11