Samantha W. Chou, D.M.D N. Southport Ave. Chicago, Illinois Phone: Fax:

Similar documents
Prosthetic Options in Implant Dentistry. Hakimeh Siadat, DDS, MSc Associate Professor

Module 2 Introduction to immediate full arch fixed implant treatment - surgical options

Arrangement of the artificial teeth:

Real World Implant Prosthetics: Fixed and Removable Samuel M. Strong, DDS

Lect. 14 Prosthodontics Dr. Osama

Upper arch. 1Prosthodontics. Dr.Bassam Ali Al-Turaihi. Basic anatomy & & landmark of denture & mouth

Pre prosthetic surgery

Conus Concept: A Rewarding Complete Denture Treatment

Fixed Partial Dentures /FPDs/, Implant Supported. in implant prosthodontics

Surveying. 3rd year / College of Dentistry/University of Baghdad ( ) Page 1

Selection and arrangement of teeth in rpd

Figure (2-6): Labial frenum and labial notch.

Uppers are from Mars, Lowers from Venus Clarifying Overdentures

It has been proposed that partially edentulous maxillectomy

Preserving the Integrity of Facial Structures with Implant-Retained Overdentures

SCD Case Study. Attachments in Prosthodontics

STANDARDS & GUIDELINES

DEVELOPING ANALOGUE/SUBTITUTE FOR THE MANDIBULAR DENTURE BEARING AREA. Dr Muhammad Rizwan Memon FCPS Assistant Professor

Element-Z Screw-Retained Hybrid

MALO CLINIC PROTOCOL IMMEDIATE-FUNCTION CONCEPT UPPER AND LOWER JAW REHABILITATION: A CLINICAL REPORT

Osseointegrated implant-supported

Indirect retainers. 1 i

Bone Reduction Surgical Guide for the Novum Implant Procedure: Technical Note

Basic information on the. Straumann Pro Arch TL. Straumann Pro Arch TL

SCD Case Study. Implant-supported overdentures

1- Implant-supported vs. implant retained distal extension mandibular partial overdentures and residual ridge resorption. Abstract Purpose: This

Removable partial dentures

Oral cavity landmarks

Complete denture impressions

Implant Restorations: A Step-By-Step Guide

When considering restoring the edentulous arch, it is important to individualise treatment

Immediate fixed teeth a treatment concept for edentulous patients

The patient gave a history of hypertension and gastritis for which was taking Lacidipine 4mg, Omeprazole 20mg and Simvastatin 40mg.

Solid Zirconia Full-Arch Implant Prosthesis (Protocol C All-CAD with Multi-Unit Abutments) BruxZir. FIRST Appointment. The BruxZir

If we listen to our patients, our treatment acceptance can approach 100%

CASE REPORT. CBCT-Assisted Treatment of the Failing Long Span Bridge with Staged and Immediate Load Implant Restoration

Featured Patient Case #1: Complete Mouth Reconstruction with Hybrid Restorations

Concepts of occlusion Balanced occlusion. Monoplane occlusion. Lingualized occlusion. Figure (10-1)

CLASSIFICATIONS. Established in 1994 as a subcommittee of the. Prosthodontic Care Committee

CHAPTER. 1. Uncontrolled systemic disease 2. Retrognathic jaw relationship

Restore your patients quality of life. Solutions for all edentulous indications

DENT Advanced Topics in Removable Prosthodontics, Winter 2008

Dental Implant Treatment Planning and Restorative Considerations

SURVEYING OF REMOVABLE PARITAL DENTURES FEB, 11, 2015

Rehabilitating a Compromised Site for Restoring Form, Function and Esthetics- A Case Report

ARAB AMERICAN UNIVERSITY. Lab. Manual. Prosthetic Dentistry1; Removable Prosthodontics. 3 rd year

Telescopic Retainers: An Old or New Solution? A Second Chance to Have Normal Dental Function

DENT Advanced Topics in Removable Prosthodontics, Winter 2008

Component parts of Chrome Cobalt Removable Partial Denture

2015 Member Speaker Forum. Chair: L. Scott Brooksby, DDS, BS. Friday, October 23, :30 AM 3:45 PM. Coral Ballroom. 3.

Oral Rehabilitation with CAMLOG implants after loss of dentition due to an accident

Benefits of CBCT in Implant Planning

The Use of Alpha-Bio Tec's Narrow NeO Implants with Cone Connection for Restoration of Limited Width Ridges

Full Arch Rehabilitation All-on-4 Technique Restorative Steps Recipe for Success

UDELL DENTAL LABORATORY Instructions for Use PREAT Precision Attachments

Laser Assembled and CAD/CAM Prosthetic Frameworks for the Debilitated Mandible. Robert Schneider, DDS, MS

In 1977, Lew1 developed a passive

We are IntechOpen, the world s leading publisher of Open Access books Built by scientists, for scientists. International authors and editors

Patient s Presenting Complaint V.C. presented with discomfort and mobility from the crowned maxillary left central incisor tooth. Fig 1.

Interface with Professional Partners

Diagnosis. overt Examination. Definitive Examination. History. atient interview. Personal History. Clinical Examination.

ADEA COHAEP SYMPOSIA: TURF WARS

CHECK-UP Determination of Impression type & Method after implant placement

Post insertion problems in complete denture.

Hybrid Denture bridges have a well-documented history

CAUSE OF TECHNICAL FAILURES OF CONICAL CROWN-RETAINED DENTURE (CCRD): A CLINICAL REPORT

Principles of. By: Dr. Ahmad Rabah

Saudi Journal of Oral and Dental Research. DOI: /sjodr. ISSN (Print) Dubai, United Arab Emirates Website:

Interdisciplinary Treatment Planning in Transitioning Periodontally Hopeless Dentition

Mandibular implant-supported overdentures: attachment systems, and number and locations of implants Part I

Set the patient in up right position. For mandibular impression the dentist stand in front of the patient

Devoted to the Advancement of Implant Dentistry


This Presentation Is Trademarked by Lawrence H. Zager, D.D.S.

Contemporary Implant Dentistry

م.م. طارق جاسم حممد REMOVABLE PARTIAL DENTURE INTRODUCTION

Techniques of local anesthesia in the mandible

DEVELOPING ANALOGUE SUBTITUTE FOR THE MAXILLARY DENTURE BEARING AREA. Dr Muhammad Rizwan Memon FCPS Assistant Professor

Utilizing Digital Treatment Planning and Guided Surgery in Conjunction with Narrow Body Implants. by Timothy F. Kosinski, DDS, MAGD

Placement of Posterior Mandibular and Maxillary Implants in Patients with Severe Bone Deficiency: A Clinical Report of Procedure

IMPRESSION MAKING (IN COMPLETE DENTURES)

(Images are at the end of article)

Guided immediate loading implant surgery planned with Implant Studio D.D.S. Jae-min, Lee

D0120 Periodic Oral Examination $31 D0140 Limited Oral Evaluation Problem Focused $41 D0145 Oral Evaluation Patient Under 3 $28 D0150 Comprehensive

Frequency of the Various Classes of Removable Partial Dentures and Selection of Major Connectors and Direct/Indirect Retainers

Guided surgery as a way to simplify surgical implant treatment in complex cases

DIAGNOSTIC/PREVENTIVE SERVICES

A FAMILY FULL OF SMILES

STAR DENTAL LAB JACK FOUNTAIN C.D.T CEDAR PARK TX Please cut out

FIXED PROSTHODONTICS

THE BIOMECHANICAL BASIS OF RETENTION IN COMPLETE DENTURES

Dental Morphology and Vocabulary

MDG Dental Plan Comparison

Nagri D et al. Linear occlusion and Neutral Zone recording for severely resorbed ridges

Employee Benefit Fund July 2018 ADA Codes and Plan Fees

Class II. Bilateral Cleft Lip and Palate. Clinician: Dr. Mike Mayhew, Boone, NC Patient: R.S. Cleft Lip and Palate.

The removable implant supported prosthesis for the upper jaw

Indian Journal of Medical Research and Pharmaceutical Sciences August 2016;3(8) ISSN: ISSN: DOI: /zenodo Impact Factor: 3.

Dr.Mikulás Krisztina. Fabrication of the trial denture, and the try in procedure

Extraction with Immediate Implant Placement and Ridge Preservation in the Posterior

Transcription:

Samantha W. Chou, D.M.D. 2325 N. Southport Ave. Chicago, Illinois 60614 Phone: 312-608-6881 Fax: 773-296-0601 Samanthawchou@gmail.com

What is our role as the dentist?

"We live in a culture in which people are often judged by their facial expression, especially the smile as an indication of intelligence, competence, inner reflections, thoughts and emotions." Harold Slavkin, D.D.S. Director, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research.

What do our patients ask of us? People want to look good- more so now than ever People want to be able to chew Improved oral health Improved overall health and well being People have active lifestyles during their treatment

Our Role as the Dentist Exam and diagnose Be attentive to patient s needs and desires Be aware of the current treatment philosophies Be able to compare and contrast advantages vs. disadvantages of various treatment options

PROSTHETIC OPTIONS Denture Over-denture Implant retained, tissue supported Implant retained/supported, tissue supported Implant retained/supported Fixed-Removable Prosthesis All on 4 Hybrid prosthesis Fixed Prosthesis

The patient s 1. Complaints, 2. Anatomy, 3. Desires, and 4. Financial commitment determine the amount of implant support, retention, and stability required.

ANATOMY OF THE EDENTULOUS MAXILLA

Supporting Structures Bone (residual ridge) Incisive foramen Maxillary tuberosity Sharp spiny processes Torus Palatinus

ANATOMY OF THE EDENTULOUS MANDIBLE

Crest of residual ridge Buccal shelf Retro-molar pad Mylohyoid ridge Mental foramen Genial Tubercles Torus Mandibularis

The needs, concerns, and expectations of patients often exceed the mere restoration of oral function. It is therefore essential to have a clear understanding of smile zone and functional and skeletal anatomy for more effective treatment planning. Myron Nevins and James Mellonig Implant Therapy: Clinical Approaches and Evidence of Success

MAXILLARY/ MANDIBULAR PROSTHETICS Mandibular Prosthetic options are governed by availability of bone and function. Maxillary Prosthetic options are dictated by function and esthetics.

PROSTHETIC OPTIONS Denture Over-denture Implant retained, tissue supported Implant retained/supported, tissue supported Implant retained/supported Fixed-Removable Prosthesis All on 4 Hybrid prosthesis Fixed Prosthesis

Maxillary Denture Examine the maxillary ridge morphology - Ridge height - Vestibular depth (anterior and buccal) - Frenum attachments - Palate morphology - Maxillary tuberosity definition - Pterygomaxillary notch definition - Palatal throat form (does the soft palate drop) - Vibrating line position - Sufficient space between coronoid process and tuberosity?

Mandibular Denture Examine the mandibular ridge morphology - Ridge height - Vestibular depth (anterior and buccal) - Frenum attachments - Muscle attachment - Arch form - Buccal shelf - Lateral throat form

Diagnostic/ Final impression Make sure the anatomical landmarks are captured

PATIENT PROSTHETIC COMPLAINTS Dentures are loose Dentures do not fit adequately Cannot feel or taste food appropriately Dislike removable appliances Dentures are more high maintenance Psychological effects of dentures TeethFalOut.mpg

If residual ridge morphology is severely resorbed, unable to fabricate complete dentures that are retentive or stable.

PROSTHETIC OPTIONS Denture Over-denture Implant retained, tissue supported Implant retained/supported, tissue supported Implant retained/supported Fixed-Removable Prosthesis All on 4 Hybrid prosthesis Fixed Prosthesis

Advantages of Implant Overdentures Prevent bone loss Maintain facial esthetics Reduce or eliminate prosthesis movement Create reproducible CO Eliminate soft tissue abrasions Improve chewing efficiency Increase occlusal forces

Advantages of Implant Overdentures Increase prosthesis Retention, Stability and Support Improve speech Reduce or eliminate denture size Remove easily at night to control nocturnal parafunction Repair easier than fixed prosthesis Shorter prosthetic appointments

BIOMECHANICS AND PROSTHODONTICS RETENTION Quality inherent in the prosthesis acting to resist the forces of dislodgement along the path of placement.

RETENTION

BIOMECHANICS AND PROSTHODONTICS RETENTION Quality inherent in the prosthesis acting to resist the forces of dislodgement along the path of placement. SUPPORT Resistance to occlusal function; the foundation on which a prosthesis rests. Resistance to occlusal load.

SUPPORT

BIOMECHANICS AND PROSTHODONTICS RETENTION Quality inherent in the prosthesis acting to resist the forces of dislodgement along the path of placement. SUPPORT Resistance to occlusal function; the foundation on which a prosthesis rests. Resistance to occlusal load. STABILITY The quality of a prosthesis to be firm, steady, or constant, to resist displacement by functional horizontal or rotational stresses.

STABILITY

PROSTHETIC OPTIONS Denture Over-denture Implant retained, tissue supported Implant retained/supported, tissue supported Implant retained/supported Fixed-Removable Prosthesis All on 4 Hybrid prosthesis Fixed Prosthesis

Maxillary Overdenture IMPLANT RETAINED TISSUE SUPPORTED Anatomical conditions are good to excellent Patient s needs and desires are minimal: primarily related to lack of retention Cost is a primary factor Prosthesis all tissue supported, retained by implants Common type of attachment used for this prosthesis is a locater, O-ring ( ball and socket ) or an ERA

Mandibular Overdenture IMPLANT RETAINED TISSUE SUPPORTED Implants in position of canines, independent of each other in final prosthesis, Allows prosthesis saggittal rotation, no horizontal rotation Posterior ridge must have good anatomy, stability and denture retention Prosthesis all tissue supported, retained by implants. Common type of attachment used for this prosthesis is an Locater, O-ring ( ball and socket ) or an ERA

EQUAL DISTANCE OFF THE MIDLINE Implants should be parallel to each Other and perpendicular to the Occlusal plane, at the same horizontal height

Implant retained/ Tissue supported Overdenture Advantage: Cost Disadvantage: Poor implant support and stability Increase in prosthetic maintenance

Mandibular Overdenture IMPLANT RETAINED TISSUE SUPPORTED Implants in the same position as the locater/ O-ring prostheses, but implants are splinted together by a bar without any distal cantilever. Reduced loading forces than individual implants Anatomical conditions are good to excellent Posterior ridge must have good anatomy, stability and denture retention Patient s needs and desires are minimal Patient can afford new prosthesis and connecting bar

HADER BAR ATTACHEMENT WILL ALLOW MOVEMENT OF THE PROSTHESIS TO REDUCE FORCE ON THE BAR BAR ALLOWS THE ANTERIOR CURVE OF THE ARCH RESULTS IN AN IMPROVED LINGUAL CONTOUR OF THE RESTORATION BAR SHOULD NOT HAVE CANTILEVER TO THE DISTAL SIDE OF THE IMPLANTS

Greatest failure of implants is due to occlusal overload The metal connecting bar needs passive fit Take PA x- rays to verify seating Cut and solder if necessary Denture is tissue supported, implant retained Bar design must allow for saggital rotation, if not posterior region will be a cantilever

PROSTHETIC OPTIONS Denture Over-denture Implant retained, tissue supported Implant retained/supported, tissue supported Implant retained/supported Fixed-Removable Prosthesis All on 4 Hybrid prosthesis Fixed Prosthesis

Maxillary Overdenture IMPLANT RETAINED-SUPPORTED, TISSUE SUPPORTED 4 implants are placed, joined by a rigid bar Implant positions allow for a cantilever Denture has less rotation, only that permitted by the bar attachments Palate of the overdenture is maintained for tissue support

PALATE IS REINFORCED TO PREVENT PROSTHESIS FRACTURE AND ALSO TO PREVENT DISTAL CANTILEVER FROM PLACING TOO MUCH OCCLUSAL LOAD ON THE BAR.

Maxillary Overdenture IMPLANT RETAINED-SUPPORTED, TISSUE SUPPORTED Excellent retention and stability Opposing occlusion must be stable Design of this denture is according to implants A-P spread, opposing occlusion and patient s previous dental history

Mandibular Overdenture IMPLANT RETAINED-SUPPORTED, TISSUE SUPPORTED Moderate to poor posterior anatomy Lack of retention and stability in the traditional denture Soft tissue abrasion from the traditional denture Speech difficulties from the traditional denture More demanding patient type 4-5 implants are placed, joined by a rigid bar Denture has less rotation, only that permitted by the bar attachments

PROSTHETIC OPTIONS Denture Over-denture Implant retained, tissue supported Implant retained/supported, tissue supported Implant retained/supported Fixed-Removable Prosthesis All on 4 Hybrid prosthesis Fixed Prosthesis

Maxillary Overdenture IMPLANT RETAINED-SUPPORTED Moderate- severe problems with traditional dentures Needs or desires are demanding Need to increase bulk of prosthesis Inability to wear traditional prosthesis Desire to abate bone loss Unfavorable anatomy for complete dentures Problems with function and stability

MESO BAR OF THE MARIUS BRIDGE

SECONDARY STRUCTURE OF THE MARIUS BRIDGE IS EMBEDDED IN THE REMOVABLE PORTION OF THE PROSTHESIS.

O- RINGS ON CAST PALLADIUM BAR

Maxillary Overdenture IMPLANT RETAINED-SUPPORTED PALATLESS OVERDENTURE The palate can be removed only if the A-P spread is adequate If not enough support and stability a partial palate will be maintained

LOCATOR ABUTMENTS ON CAD/CAM MILLED TITANIUM BAR

IF PATIENT DOES NOT WANT CO-CR METAL REINFORCEMENT, CAN EMBED TITANIUM MESH WITHIN THE ACRYLIC TO REINFORCE OVERDENTURE

Mandibular Overdenture IMPLANT RETAINED-SUPPORTED 4-6 Implants joined rigidly by a bar Cantilever is used Posterior bearing areas are not adequate Implants give enough support to avoid tissue contact Movement is minimum, only that permitted by attachments.

Mandibular Overdenture IMPLANT RETAINED-SUPPORTED Excellent retention and stability Opposing occlusion must be stable Design denture according to A-P spread and opposing occlusion

Disadvantages of Implant Overdenture Psychological (need for non-removable teeth) Prosthetic space required Long-term maintenance Attachment Relines New prosthesis every 7 years Food impaction Movement, permitted by the attachments

Advantages of Implant Overdenture over Fixed Prosthesis Esthetics is easier to control providing more soft tissue support with labial flanges and denture teeth than with metal and porcelain in the fixed prosthesis. When parafunction is present, the prosthesis may be removed at night helping in the treatment.

PROSTHETIC OPTIONS Denture Over-denture Implant retained, tissue supported Implant retained/supported, tissue supported Implant retained/supported Fixed-Removable Prosthesis All on 4 Hybrid prosthesis Fixed Prosthesis

FIXED-REMOVABLE PROSTHESIS Fixed-Removable Prosthesis 4 or more implants Cannot be removed by patient, only by dentist Prosthesis is completely implant retained/supported CAD/CAM milled bar or casted bar that has a processed denture over it

A-P spread THE GREATER THE AP DISTANCE, THE MORE FAVORABLE THE SITUATION FOR A POSTERIOR CANTILEVER

FIXED-REMOVABLE PROSTHESIS Opposing dentition stable Prosthesis does not allow any type of rotation A-P spread must be adequate for posterior cantilever

What is an All-on-4?

Introduction to All-on-4 Principle Four implants (two straight implants in the anterior and two angled implants in the posterior) supporting a provisional, fixed and immediately loaded full-arch prosthesis Indications Edentulous mandible or maxilla, terminal dentition Surgical Access Open flap Available Implant Systems All Nobel Biocare implant systems with Multi-Unit Abutments

Principles of All-on-4 When speaking of the All-on-4 history, research and application, it should really be divided up into the following pieces: immediate loading of the fully edentulous mandible immediate loading of the fully edentulous maxilla support for a full arch fixed restoration on 4 implants instead of the more common 6-8 for the maxilla and 5-6 for the mandible use of tilted implants in the posterior to avoid bone grafting

All-on-4 Benefits Benefits of Angled posterior implants: Help avoid relevant anatomical structures and can be anchored in better quality anterior bone Offer improved support of the prosthesis by reducing cantilevers Reduce the need for bone grafting by increasing bone-to-implant contact Final restoration: Full-arch restoration with only 4 implants Fixed and removable final prosthetic solutions Flexible solutions Efficient Treatment Flow: Immediately loaded for shorter treatment times and improved patient satisfaction

Dr. Paolo Malo is credited with developing the All-on- 4 technique using Nobel implants that were specifically designed by him to provide torque.

2 weeks post op

PROSTHETIC OPTIONS Denture Over-denture Implant retained, tissue supported Implant retained/supported, tissue supported Implant retained/supported (Marius Bridge) Fixed-Removable Prosthesis All on 4 Hybrid prosthesis Fixed Prosthesis

FIXED PROSTHESIS FIXED PROSTHESIS The patient wants to have non removable restorations Bone quantity and quality have to be optimal, if not, augmentation procedures will be necessary Lip support is close to adequate (no need of acrylic) Patient is committed to a long, complicated and expensive treatment

FIXED PROSTHESIS

Fixed Prosthesis

FIXED PROSTHESIS

FIXED PROSTHESIS The case is approached in a different manner Provisionals Bone grafting Sinus Augmentation Vertical and Horizontal Ridge Augmentations Implant placements Soft Tissue Management Final Prosthesis

FIXED PROSTHESIS During treatment planning, if all remaining teeth in an arch needs to be extracted and patient would like to have fixed provisionals. Extractions and implant placements can be done in stages to allow fixed provisionals during treatment period.

FIXED PROSTHESIS Treatment plan for the Edentulous Maxilla Arch Form Number of Implants Implant position in the premaxilla Square 6 2 implants in Canines Ovoid 7 2 canines and 1 incisor Tapering 8 2 canines and 2 incisors

Maxillary arch form Square Ovoid Tapering

Advantages of Fixed Prosthesis Psychological: feels like teeth Less prosthetic maintenance - Attachments - Relines - New Overdenture Less food entrapment

Mandiblular Dynamics The mandible flexes towards the midline on opening or during protrusive movements as a result of the internal pterygoid muscle attachments on the ramus. The mandible also torques when the inferior border rotating out and up and the crestal region rotating lingually- the movements is caused by the masseter muscles during forceful biting or parafunction.

Mandibular Dynamics The flexure of the mandible during opening and protrusive movements occurs distal to the mental foramens. The amount of flexure depends on the bone volume and sites in question. From the first molar to the first molar region, the medial movement maybe 800 microns.

FABRICATE THREE INDEPENDENT PROSTHESIS OR MORE WHEN GREATER MANDIBULAR BODY MOVEMENT IS EXPECTED DUE TO PARAFUNCTION IMPLANTS THAT ARE PLACED BEHIND MENTAL FORAMENS CANNOT BE SPLINTED TOGETHER