Cotton Incorporated TARGET SPOT UPDATE. A. K. Hagan Auburn University

Similar documents
TARGET SPOT IN COTTON POSSIBLE EMERGING DISEASE

Pathogenicity of Corynespora cassiicola in Upland Cotton

Peanut Disease Control Field Trials 2015

Agronomic In-Service Training

2015 Evaluation of In-Furrow and Foliar Fungicides for Disease Control in Peanut, Jay, FL

Disease Control on a Budget

Corynespora cassiicola

THROUGH A GLASS, DARKLY. R. C. Kemerait; Jr. Department of Plant Pathology, The University of Georgia Cotton Incorporated Target Spot Summit

Crop Disease Management Row Crop Short Course March 1 st, 2018

Peanut Disease Control Field Trials 2013

CONTENTS. Early Blight Fungicide Trials...2 o Early blight degree days o Early blight fungicide trial...4

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

2008 APPLIED PEANUT PLANT PATHOLOGY RESEARCH RESULTS

Brenna Aegerter Michelle Le Strange Gene Miyao Scott Stoddard Tom Turini. University of California Cooperative Extension

2014 Black Dot Foliar Fungicides (200 Series)

THRIPS EFFICACY TRIALS IN SOUTH GEORGIA. J. D. Griffin, J.R. Ruberson, R.J. Ottens and P.M. Roberts Dept. of Entomology, Univ. of Georgia Tifton GA

Objective: How it Was Done:

Integrated Management of White Mold and the Use of Foliar Fungicides

Heather M. Kelly Field Crops Plant Pathologist UT-WTREC, Jackson, TN

2015 Fungicide Update

Wisconsin Field Crops Pathology Fungicide Tests Summary

Foliar fungicide effects on soybean disease suppression, senescence and yield I.

Evaluating Season-Long Fungicide Programs for Dollar Spot Control on Creeping Bentgrass Putting Green Turf, 2017

2011 Early Season Foliar Fungicide Timing Trial on Corn

Vegetable and Fruit Disease Update

Adjustments in the Tomato Spray Program in Tennessee. Steve Bost Professor and Extension Plant Pathologist University of Tennessee

Management of Root Diseases in Sugarbeet

CONTENTS. Early Blight Fungicide Trials... 1 Early blight degree days Early blight fungicide trial... 3

Tomato Spray Program and Other Disease Control News. Steve Bost Extension Plant Pathologist University of Tennessee

CoRoN Enhancement of Pumpkin Fungicides: Effects on Foliar Diseases. Craig H. Canaday and Jim E. Wyatt, University of Tennessee

Objective: Procedures:

Date: Jan. 30, Industry Cooperators. Tim Brenneman. Field Trial Results

2013 Black Dot Foliar Fungicides (200 Series)

Four Years of Downy Mildew in Indiana: Field Trials and More. Daniel S. Egel Southwest Purdue Ag Center Vincennes, IN

Scheduling copper applications and management of greasy spot and alternaria brown spot

PEANUT SEEDLING DISEASES (Commercial Production) PEANUT NEMATODES (Commercial Production)

Soybean Rust suggested fungicide practices to prevent yield losses

IR-4 Ornamental Horticulture Program Research Report Cover Sheet

Sugar End Evaluation (1900 Series) 4 rows X 30 feet X 4 reps; RCBD All 4 rows were sprayed; foliar disease data was taken from the center 2 rows.

Update on Postbloom Fruit Drop and 2016 field trial results Natalia A. Peres

Fusarium wilt trial results

Fungal foliar disease management

Sugarcane Brown Rust Research Results From Jeff Hoy Plant Pathology and Crop Physiology Department LSU Agricultural Center Baton Rouge, LA 70803

Wisconsin Field Crops Pathology Fungicide Tests Summary

Febina Mathew 1, Kathleen Grady 1, Taylor Olson 1, Bob Harveson 2, Michelle Gilley 3, Jessica Halvorson 3, and Samuel Markell 3

Post-bloom fruit drop disease cycle Colletotrichum acutatum

2006- Foliar insecticide effects on soybean aphid and soybean yield. Summary Background Objective Site and application description

Potassium Deficiency in Cotton Early Detection and Alleviation

A. K. Hagan, M. E. Rivas-Davila, K. L. Bowen Department of Entomology and Plant Pathology. L. Wells Wiregrass Research and Extension Center

Management of downy mildew, onion neck rot and maggot damage on onions 2014

Treatments protocol # Sponsor Materials Timing/interval FP/ac Tol 1 lab non-treated Y 2 lab Thiram 65WSB 14d 3.0 lb Y

2014 Standard Seed Treatment (2700 Series)

RETURN SERVICE REQUESTED BROUGHT TO YOU BY THESE PARTNERS: RESEARCH RESULTS

E. Lyons, K. Jordan, and K. Carey. Department of Plant Agriculture and the Guelph Turfgrass Institute, University of Guelph, Ontario.

Silverleaf Whitefly and Cotton Lint Stickiness

Short Staple Regional Cotton Variety Trial, Safford Agricultural Center, Abstract. Introduction. Materials and Methods

DISEASE AND FUNGICIDE MANAGEMENT FOR CORN & WHEAT Heather M. Kelly Field Crops Plant Pathology West Tennessee Research and Education Center

University of Idaho Pink Rot Fungicide Trial Powdery Scab Fungicide Trial

Brenna Aegerter UCCE San Joaquin County

Efficacy of Organic Fungicides for Vegetable Diseases HERBS - Basil Downy mildew Actinovate effective Companion Sonata effective Actinovate

Highlights From 2017 Muck Onion Herbicide Trials Christy Hoepting

Thrips Control Programs & Population Dynamics in Central SJV. Tom Turini UC Farm Advisor, Fresno

Crop Staging guide FungiCideS

Reports of Soybean Research Conducted in 2011 by the Entomology Project

AGVISE Laboratories Established 1976

Eggplant, Pepper, and Tomato. Early Blight. Identification and Life Cycle. Plant Response and Damage

Update on fruit tree diseases: Scab, Blast and Blight

Delivering the Proven Performance of Three Industry-leading Technologies

No. 8 May 20, Calendar of Events. In This Issue

New SDHI Fungicides: Outlook for Cherry Disease Control in 2012

Safflower FOLIAR SPRAYS. Soybean SEED TREATMENT

Predicting the Unpredictable: Disease Factors in Small Grain Production. Juliet M. Marshall. Idaho Falls and Aberdeen R&E Centers

Management Considerations: Squaring to First Flower

COTTON HARVEST AID. Cotton Alliance Research Progress Report 2010

Sugar Beet Seed Treatment

Table 11. Brown Patch on Ryegrass Location: Hancock Turfgrass Research Center, E. Lansing, MI Rating Scale: Percent area infected with brown patch.

2011 Lygus Bug Management Trial in Blackeyes Kearney Research and Extension Center, Parlier, CA C.A. Frate 1, S.C. Mueller and P.B.

Powdery mildew management in processing tomatoes. Brenna Aegerter University of California Cooperative Extension, San Joaquin County

Final 2013 Delaware Soybean Board Report

SOYBEAN DISEASE CONTROL John D. Mueller, Extension Soybean Pathologist

WATERMELON 2006 Powdery Mildew Control Trial in Stanislaus County

2015 Field Trials Report. GRDC Project: Australian Cereal Rust Control Programme (ACRCP) Integrated Fungicide Management (IFM) Programme

Using silicon, Stimplex and plant resistance in pumpkin production systems to reduce plant disease loss

SMALL FRUIT DISEASES (Commercial)

Initial Characterization of Corynespora cassiicola and Alternaria spp. affecting Florida tomatoes Tomato Institute, Naples, FL

Target Diseases and Application Timing Information for Foliar Fungicides Labeled for Use on Wheat in Missouri

2009 REPORT OF INSECTICIDE EVALUATION

Influence of Selected Herbicide Treatments on Ironweed Control, Forage Yield, and Forage Quality in Tall Fescue Pastures

Insecticides Labeled for Control of Bean Leaf Beetle, Mexican Bean Beetle, and Green Cloverworm. Amount product per acre

Improving the management of white mold in dry beans. Michael Wunsch, plant pathologist NDSU Carrington Research Extension Center

Efficacy of Organic Biopesticides for Vegetable Diseases HERBS - Basil Downy mildew Actinovate effective Regalia Companion Sonata effective

Evaluation of Syngenta products to control of pink and gray snow mold in Washington, Idaho, and Montana

Processing Tomato Pest Management Research in Fresno County

LYGUS BUG MANAGEMENT IN SEED ALFALFA. Eric T. Natwick and M. Lopez 1 ABSTRACT

DISEASE MANAGEMENT IN WHEAT AND OTHER SMALL GRAINS. A. K. Hagan Auburn University

Goal: Evaluate plant health effects while suppressing dollar spot and brown patch

Management of Poa annua on Overseeded Fairways

Foliar Fungicides for Soybeans best environmental conditions for that return on investment. Dr. Anne E. Dorrance Professor Plant Pathology

Efficacy of Additional Insecticides for Insect Pests in a MGVII Soybean Beaumont, TX 2005

Treatments protocol, Trial 2 # Color Sponsor Materials App Interval FP/A Tol

Transcription:

Cotton Incorporated TARGET SPOT UPDATE A. K. Hagan Auburn University

TARGET SPOT

Target Spot Easily confused with Ascochyta Blight and Myrothecium Leaf Spot which are seen on 3 to 5 leaf cotton thru first bloom. Target Spot is mid to late season disease. Ascochyta Blight Target Spot

Distribution of Target Spot in Cotton Southern United States 2013 Arkansas Louisiana Corynespora cassiicola Host Range o Soybean o Sesame o Tomato o Cucumber o Hydrangea o Lantana

Target Spot Moisture driven disease. Develops quickly after canopy closure. Disease of rank cotton. Irrigated cotton with high yield potential is at greatest risk as is cotton in high rainfall regions of Coastal South. Rotation and tillage impacts are unclear.

DOES TARGET SPOT REDUCE YIELD? Estimate of 200 lb lint/a Fulmer et al. 2012. PD 96:1066. Claims of up to 600 lb lint/a

Possible TS Impacts on Yield If leaf(s) associated with immature boll(s) are lost due to TS, bolls may not mature. Heavy late season defoliation may trigger square and immature boll shed in tops. Late season leaf shed in mid canopy after bolls mature may not impact yield, it s more of harvest aid.

Target spot impact on seed cotton yield GC 2012 Seed Cotton Yield lb/a 4400 4200 4000 3800 3600 3400 3200 3000 2800 2600 2400 2200 2000 Phytogen 499 300 to 350 lb lint/a 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 7.5 8 Target Spot Intensity Yield = 5121.7 245.84*(TSI), R 2 = 0.35*** Seed Cotton Yield lb/a 4400 4200 4000 3800 3600 3400 3200 3000 2800 2600 2400 2200 2000 DPL 1050 50 to 100 lb lint/a 4 4.5 5 5.5 6 6.5 7 Yield = 3788.03 55.84*(TSI), R 2 = 0.03 NS

No Impact of Target Spot on Lint Quality in 3 2012 Studies

Disease Progress in Two Cotton Varieties 2012 # Headline applications # Headline applications 0 1 2 3 4 5 10 10 Phytogen 499 9 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 Deltapine 1050 8 8 Target Spot Intensity 7 6 5 4 3 Target Spot Intensity 7 6 5 4 3 2 2 1 1 Rating Date Rating Date First fungicide application at first bloom July 6.

Mean Disease Progress at GC on Two Varieties 2013 10 9 8 0 1 2 3 4 No. Apps Jul 15 Jul 29 Aug 14 Aug 26 Sep 9 0 1 a 1.7 a 4.6 a 5.5 a 6.4 1 1 a 1.3 a 4.3 bc 5.4 a 6 Target Spot Rating 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 2 1 a 1.3 a 3.2 c 4.6 b 6.1 3 1 a 1.2 a 3.7 bc 4.3 b 5.5 4 1 a 1.2 a 3.2 c 4.2 b 5.3 Cotton Variety P499 1 a 1.4 a 3.8 a 4.8 a 5.7 D1252 1 a 1.2 a 3.4 b 4.5 b 4.6

Cotton Variety Sensitivity To Target Spot

Cotton variety and fungicide impact Target Spot Cotton Variety TS Rating Phytogen 499 Phytogen 565 DPL 1137 DPL 1050 DPL 1252 Fibermax 1944 Stoneville 6448 Fungicide Program Headline 12 fl oz @ 1 st and 3 rd wk Control 5.7 a 5.3 ab 4.9 bc 4.8 c 4.9 bc 4.5 c 4.8 c TS Rating 4.6 b 5.4 a

Target Spot Reaction of Cotton Varieties PEF Cotton variety Target Spot Cotton Variety Target Spot Phytogen 339 WFR 6.3 b e Croplan CG 3787 B2RF 7.0 a Phytogen 375 WFR 6.5 a d Bayer ST 4946 GLB2 6.5 a d Phytogen 499 WFR 6.4 a d Bayer ST 6448 GLB2 5.9 de Phytogen 575 WFR 6.7 ab DynaGro 2619 B2RF 6.4 a d DPL 1048 B2RF 6.5 a d Americot 1511 B2RF 6.4 a d DPL 1050 B2RF 6.3 b e Americot 5315 B2RF 6.6 abc DPL 1137 B2RF 6.3 b e ALLTex Nitro 44 6.2 b e DPL 1219 B2RF 5.8 e DPL 1252 B2RF 6.3 b e < 10% bolls open

Fungicide Efficacy

Comparison of Recommended Fungicides for Target Spot Control on Two Cotton Varieties GC 2013 Treatments and Timing (wk of bloom) Aug 26 Sep9 Control 5.1 a 6.2 Twinline 7 fl oz (2 nd, 4 th, and 6 th wk) 4.2 bc 5.0 Twinline 8.5 fl oz (2 nd, 4 th, and 6 th wk) 4.3 bc 5.2 Headline 6 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.5 bc 5.5 Headline 9floz(2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.1 c 5.3 Headline 12 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.1 c 5.4 Quadris 6 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.6 b 5.6 Quadris 9 fl oz (2 nd, 4 th, and 6 th wk) 4.4 bc 5.5

Impact of application rate on the control of target spot on cotton with Headline GC 2013 Headline 6 fl oz Headline 9 fl oz Headline 12 fl oz Phytogen 499 10 10 9 9 8 8 Target Spot Rating Control Development of target spot on two cotton varieties GC 2013 7 7 6 6 5 4 3 5 4 3 2 2 1 1 DPL 1252

Headline Programs Compared GC 2013 Fungicide and Rate Timing Aug 26 AUDPC Control 6.8 a 188 a Headline 6 fl oz Headline 12 fl oz Headline 12 fl oz + Bravo 1 pt Headline 12 fl oz + Bravo 1 pt 2 nd and 4 th wk Bloom 2 nd and 4 th wk Bloom PHS, 2 nd, and 4 th wk Bloom 2 nd, 4 th, and 6 th wk Bloom 6.1 b 159 bcd 5.1 e 132 ef 5.3 e 125 f 5.1 e 140 def

Fungicides compared for target spot control on two cotton varieties FC 2013 Fungicide and Rate /A No. Sprays* Disease Rating Control 5.7 a Enclosure 4E 2 pt/a 2 5.1 bc Enclosure 4E 2 pt/a 4 5.4 ab Enclosure 4E 2 pt/a 6 4.9 cd Headline 9 fl oz 2 4.5 d Quadris 6 fl oz 2 5.2 bc Quadris 6 fl oz 3 5.3 abc * Scheduled

Syngenta Fungicides for Target Spot Control GC 2013 Treatments Jul 15 Jul 29 Aug 14 Aug 26 AUDPC Control 1.0 3.6 a 5.8 a 6.8 a 188 a Headline 6 fl oz (2x)* 1.0 2.7 a d 5.0 bc 6.1 ab 159 b d Quadris 6 fl oz (2x)* 1.0 2.9 a d 4.8 cd 5.4 c e 154 b d Quadris Top 8 fl oz (2x)* 1.0 2.7 a e 4.9 cd 6.0 b 155 b d A20760 6.7 fl oz (2X)* 1.0 2.3 c e 5.0 bc 5.9 bc 150 c e A15457 10.3 fl oz (2X)* 1.0 3.2 ab 5.0 bc 6.4 ab 168 a c A18126 4.76 fl oz (2X)* 1.0 3.0 a c 5.3 bc 6.1 ab 167 a c Actigard 0.7 oz* 1.0 3.3 ab 5.4 ab 6.4 ab 174 ab Actigard 7 oz + Quadris (2x)* 1.0 2.4 b e 5.1 bc 5.8 b d 153 b e Actigard 0.7 oz + A18126 (2x)* 1.0 2.5 b e 5.0 bc 5.7 b e 153 b e Headline 12 fl oz (3x)** 1.0 2.0 de 4.4 de 5.1 e 132 ef *Applied 3 rd and 6 th week of bloom; **Applied 2 nd, 4 th, and 6 th week of bloom.

Cheminova Target Spot Study GC 2013 Treatments and Timing (wk of bloom) Aug 26 Control 6.4 a Topguard 14 fl oz + Koverall 2 lb (PS, 2 nd, 4 th ) 5.3 d Topguard 28 fl oz (2 nd wk) 5.3 d Topguard 14 fl oz (PS, 2 nd, 4 th ) 5.4 cd Headline 12 fl oz (PS, 2 nd, 4 th ) 5.8 bcd Fontelis 24 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th ) 5.9 bc Fontelis 16 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th ) 5.7 bcd Topguard 14 fl oz (2 nd wk) 5.7 bcd

BASF Target Spot Study GC 2013 Treatments and Timing (wk of bloom) Aug 26 Control 5.7 a Twinline 8.5 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.5 bcd Headline 6 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.4 cd Headline 12 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.4 cd Priaxor fb Headline AMP (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.4 cd Priaxor 4 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.3 d Sercadis 4.5 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.4 cd Muscle 7.2 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.9 b

Application Timing for Target Spot Control GC, Aug 26 2013 Fungicide Phytogen 499 Timing (wk of bloom) TS Rating Headline PHS + 2 nd wk 6.2 a Fungicide Headline DPL 1252 Timing (wk of bloom) TS Rating PHS + 2 nd wk 4.9 bcd Headline 2 nd & 4 th wk 5.2 ab Headline 4 th & 6 th wk 4.5 cde Headline 6 th & 8 th wk 5.2 ab Bravo WS 2 wks (4x) 5.0 bcd Bravo WS 2 wks (4x) 4.3 ef + Headline Control 6.2 a Headline 2 nd & 4 th wk 4.4 def Headline 4 th & 6 th wk 3.9 f Headline 6 th & 8 th wk 4.4 def Bravo WS 2 wks (4x) 4.1 ef Bravo WS 2 wks (4x) 4.0 f + Headline Control 5.1 bc

Application Timing for Target Spot Control GC 2013 Final Fungicide Phytogen 499 Timing (wk of bloom) TS Rating Headline PHS + 2 nd wk 6.7 Headline 2 nd & 4 th wk 6.4 Headline 4 th & 6 th wk 5.8 Headline 6 th & 8 th wk 5.7 Bravo WS 2 wks (4x) 5.5 Bravo WS 2 wks (4x) 5.7 + Headline Control 7.0 Fungicide DPL 1252 Timing (wk of bloom) TS Rating Headline PHS + 2 nd wk 5.9 Headline 2 nd & 4 th wk 5.1 Headline 4 th & 6 th wk 5.0 Headline 6 th & 8 th wk 5.1 Bravo WS 2 wks (4x) 5.2 Bravo WS 2 wks (4x) 4.8 + Headline Control 6.0

Fungicide placement and control of target spot on cotton BARU 2013 Nozzle Arrangement Jul 24 Aug 15 Aug 27 Sep 10 Broadcast 1.4 a 3.0 b 4.0 b 4.9 Drops 1.3 a 2.5 b 3.5 c 4.6 Control 1.4 a 3.9 c 4.6 a 5.7

Fungicide Placement and Target Spot Control BARU 2013 Cotton Variety Fungicide Target Spot Phytogen 499 Control 5.1 a 6.5 Headline 9 fl oz 4.3 bc 5.5 Quadris 9 fl oz 4.6 b 5.8 DPL 1252 Control 3.9 c 4.8 Headline 9floz 2.6 e 3.5 Quadris 9 fl oz 3.4 d 4.3

Fungicide placement and control of target spot on cotton Field Crops Unit 2013 Nozzle Arrangement Aug 6 Aug 13 Aug 31 Sept 6 Broadcast 2.6 ab 3.8 a 4.4 b 4.6 b Drop 2.4 b 3.8 a 4.2 b 4.6 b Control 3.0 a 3.9 a 4.9 a 5.5 a Cotton variety impacts target spot intensity Field Crops Unit 2013 Cotton Variety Aug 6 Aug 13 Aug 31 Sept 6 Phytogen 499 2.9 a 4.0 a 4.9 a 5.4 a DPL 1252 2.4 b 3.6 b 3.9 b 4.1b

Fungicide placement for target spot control FC 2013 Fungicide Aug 31 Sep 6 Control 4.9 a 5.6 a Headline 9 fl oz 4.0 c 4.3 c Quadris 9 fl oz 4.5 b 4.9 b

Target Spot Study Results 2013 Disease following same pattern in South AL as was seen in 2012. Considerable TS in Central AL studies. Limited Target Spot in TN Valley. Varieties differ in their susceptibility to TS with results similar to those seen in 2012. Fungicide efficacy is marginal with Headline often having an advantage. No silver bullet among candidate fungicides. Little advantage from additional fungicide applications. Fine tuning application timing and placement may help enhance target spot control. Tillage and rotation impacts appear minimal.

Comparison of Recommended Fungicides for Target Spot Control on Two Cotton Varieties GC 2013 Treatments and Timing (wk of bloom) Aug 20 Aug 26 Control 5.3 a 5.1 a Twinline 7 fl oz (2 nd, 4 th, and 6 th wk) 3.8 c 4.2 bc Twinline 8.5 fl oz (2 nd, 4 th, and 6 th wk) 4.2 bc 4.3 bc Headline 6 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.0 bc 4.5 bc Headline 9floz(2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.1 bc 4.1 c Headline 12 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 3.9 c 4.1 c Quadris 6 fl oz (2 nd and 4 th wk) 4.5 b 4.6 b Quadris 9 fl oz (2 nd, 4 th, and 6 th wk) 4.2 bc 4.4 bc