Berks County Treatment Courts

Similar documents
SEVENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT DRUG COURT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK. Calhoun and Cleburne Counties

Nebraska LB605: This bill is designed to reduce prison overcrowding and allows for alternatives to incarceration like CAM.

The Promise of DWI Courts November 14, 2013 Judge J. Michael Kavanaugh, (Ret.) Senior Director NCDC Judge Kent Lawrence, (Ret.)

PRINCE GEORGES COUNTY VETERANS TREATMENT COURT

THE ESTIMATED ECONOMIC IMPACTS AND BENEFITS OF ACCOUNTABILITY COURT PROGRAMS IN GEORGIA EVIDENCE FROM A SURVEY OF PROGRAM PARTICIPANTS

NORTHAMPTON COUNTY DRUG COURT. An Overview

24/7 sobriety program THE MONTANA STORY

The 5 Obstacles to Alcohol Monitoring:

Community-based sanctions

Problem-Solving Courts : A Brief History. The earliest problem-solving court was a Drug Court started in Miami-Dade County, FL in 1989

Responding to Homelessness. 11 Ideas for the Justice System

Section I. 1. Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with justice system case processing.

Assessment of the Safe Streets Treatment Options Program (SSTOP)

Public Safety, Office of Traffic Safety Grant to partially fund a Sober 24 program in Carson City from October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018.

2016 MATCP Conference. Research Says Best Practices in Assessment, Management, and Treatment of Impaired Drivers. Mark Stodola Probation Fellow

MINNESOTA DWI COURTS: A SUMMARY OF EVALUATION FINDINGS IN NINE DWI COURT PROGRAMS

Oriana House, Inc. Substance Abuse Treatment. Community Corrections. Reentry Services. Drug & Alcohol Testing. Committed to providing programming

Research Says Best Practices in Assessment, Management and Treatment of Impaired Drivers. NADCP July 28, 2015

Do the Adult Best Practices Standards Apply to Other Treatment Court Types? What Fits, What Might Fit, What Doesn t Fit

Colorado Statewide DWI and Drug Court Process Assessment and Outcome Evaluation

Responding to Homelessness. 11 Ideas for the Justice System

ADULT DRUG TREATMENT COURT STANDARDS

Wisconsin Community Services, Inc.

LEWIS COUNTY COURT DRUG COURT

Keys to Designing and Implementing Effective DWI Policies

LUCAS COUNTY TASC, INC. OUTCOME ANALYSIS

19 TH JUDICIAL DUI COURT REFERRAL INFORMATION

2017 NADCP Conference. Research Says Best Practices in Assessment, Management, and Treatment of Impaired Drivers. Mark Stodola Probation Fellow

Peter Weir, Executive Director of the Department of Public Safety, Chair of the Commission on Criminal and Juvenile Justice

DRUG COURT PARTICIPANT HANDBOOK

Do the Adult Best Practices Standards Apply to Other Treatment Court Types? What Fits, What Might Fit, What Doesn t Fit

CCAPPOAP Conference. Accountability and Recovery for DUI Offenders

APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO ESTABLISH A DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAM SUPREME COURT OF VIRGINIA

GOVERNMENT OF BERMUDA Ministry of Culture and Social Rehabilitation THE BERMUDA DRUG TREATMENT COURT PROGRAMME

Second Judicial District Court Specialty Courts

NEW MEXICO DRUG/DWI COURT Peer Review Summary Report

Findings from the NIJ Tribal Wellness Court Study: 68 Key Component #8

TENNESSEE RECOVERY ORIENTED COMPLIANCE COURT STRATEGY TN ROCCS. Duane Slone Circuit Court Judge 4 th Judicial District State of Tennessee

continuous court monitoring, regular drug testing, and holistic drug dependency treatment.

DWI Court Research and Best Practices:

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL COURT DIVERSION AND PRETRIAL SERVICES FISCAL YEAR 2019

Eighth Judicial District Court. Specialty Courts. Elizabeth Gonzalez. Chief Judge. DeNeese Parker. Specialty Court Administrator

As a law enforcement official you

Welcome to. St. Louis County Adult. Drug Court. This Handbook is designed to:

Judicially Managed Accountability and Recovery Court (JMARC) as a Community Collaborative. Same People. Different Outcomes.

Douglas County s Mental Health Diversion Program

FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY E.G., COMPETENCE TO STAND TRIAL CHILD CUSTODY AND VISITATION WORKPLACE DISCRIMINATION INSANITY IN CRIMINAL TRIALS

SUPERIOR COURT OF THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

SISSETON-WAHPETON OYATE TREATMENT COURT BJ Jones Chief Judge and Treatment Court Judge. Who are the Oyate?

2017 Social Service Funding Application - Special Alcohol Funds

CHAPTER 1 An Evidence-Based Approach to Corrections

THE 21ST CENTURY CURES ACT: TACKLING MENTAL HEALTH FROM THE INSIDE OUT

West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety

FAQ: Alcohol and Drug Treatments

Problem Gambling and Crime: Impacts and Solutions

The Public Safety Coordinating Council s. Criminal Justice System Data Book January 2014

Guadalupe County Veterans Treatment Court Participant s Handbook Updated: October 18, 2016

Florida Supreme Court Task Force on Treatment-Based Drug Courts April 2007

DRUG POLICY TASK FORCE

Windsor County DUI Treatment Docket Preliminary Outcome Evaluation. Final Report. September 2017 (Revised December 2017)

Honorable Mary Jane Knisely Presiding Judge, Yellowstone County Veterans Treatment Court

COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DRUG DIVERSION PROGRAM

TUCSON CITY DOMESTIC VIOLENCE COURT

Drug Court Administrator M. Keithley Williams (telephone) (fax)

Contents Opioid Treatment Program Core Program Standards... 2

Participants Handbook Revised July 2016

Handbook for Drug Court Participants

Evaluation of the First Judicial District Court Adult Drug Court: Quasi-Experimental Outcome Study Using Historical Information

Transition from Jail to Community. Reentry in Washtenaw County

CHEROKEE TRIBAL DRUG COURT MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING. THIS MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING made and entered into on the 1 st day

The Risk of Alcohol-Related Traffic Events and Recidivism Among Young Offenders A Theoretical Approach

RID: A COST EFFECTIVE INTERVENTION PROGRAM by. T.R. McGuirk, M.S., R.B. Donfeld, J.D. and J.B. Hallan, Dr.P.H. SUMMARY

Sequential Intercept Model and Problem Solving/Specialty Courts: The Intersection with Brain Injury

Behavioral Health Diversion Strategies

Progress has been achieved but there is more work to do

Bucks County Drug Court Program Application

WELD COUNTY ADULT TREATMENT COURT REFERRAL INFORMATION

MAXIMIZING TREATMENT EFFECTIVENESS FOR DWI OFFENDERS. Sharon L. Franklin, M.A. Alcohol Countermeasures Probation, Fort Wayne, Indiana, U.S.A. Summary.

Consequences of Underage Drinking

Courts and Jails. Evidence-Based Judicial Decision Making

3726 E. Hampton St., Tucson, AZ Phone (520) Fax (520)

Alternatives to Incarceration and Pretrial Detention. NYSAC Legislative Conference January 2019

West Virginia Department of Military Affairs and Public Safety

Addressing the Problem of Repeat and Chronic Impaired Drivers

Polk County Problem Solving Courts

Berks County DUI Treatment Court. Policy and Procedure Manual

Drug Abuse. Drug Treatment Courts. a social, health, economic and criminal justice problem global in nature

BJA GRANT PROJECT: Utah s Adult Drug Treatment Courts. Project Overview

ORGANIZATION OF AMERICAN STATES

Comparative Analysis of Drug Courts: Effectiveness of Sentencing an Offender to Treatment and Rehabilitation. Marissa Hundelt

TURNING POINT ASSESSMENT/TREATMENT WOMAN ABUSE PROTOCOL DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND PUBLIC SAFETY

Federal Resources for Research on Drugs and Crime. Meeting of Caribbean National Observatories on Drugs August 5, 2009

24/7 SOBRIETY PROGRAM. Presented by Circuit Judge Larry Long

Corrections, Public Safety and Policing

Stephen W. Ward Assistant District Attorney (Retired) Charlotte, North Carolina

Criminal Justice Reform: Treatment and Substance Use Disorder

Final Report*: Minimal Performance Indicators Summary Report

The New Face of Monroe County Community Supervision

ASSESSMENT OF COUNTY RESTRICTIVE INTERMEDIATE PUNISHMENT PROGRAMMING. Report presented to: Pennsylvania Commission on Crime And Delinquency

VISTA COLLEGE ONLINE CAMPUS

Transcription:

Berks County Treatment Courts Presented by Judge Peter W. Schmehl Brendan L. Harker, Probation Officer

About Berks County 44 Townships, 30 Boroughs, 1 City Covers 865 Square Miles 375,000 residents 434 people per square mile 40% of County is considered Agricultural

The Berks County Adult Probation & Parole Criminal Justice System Supervises 6,000 Individuals annually 23% directly related to Driving Under the Influence Repeat DUI Offenders account for approximately 35% of those cases Historically, over 70% of all DUI offenders have been identified as moderate to severe problem drinkers

Adult Probation Office Structure 67 Management, Professional & Support Staff 31 Probation Officers supervise 6,000 Individuals 9 Probation Officers conduct Pre-Sentence Investigations & Intake Interviews 4 Community Service Probation Officers 1 Institutional Parole Officer 13 Office Support 9 Management/Administrative

Agency Programs Accelerated Rehabilitative Disposition Program Alcohol Safe Driving Program DUI Treatment Court Program Drug Treatment Court Program DUI Supervision Unit DUS/IPP Program Interlock Program Community Service Division Second Time Offenders Program (DUI Offenders)

Agency Programs Pre-Sentence Investigation and Intake Unit Domestic Violence Supervision Program Institutional Parole Officer Hispanic Services Sexual Offenders Caseload Prostitution Supervision Caseload Electronic Monitoring Intermediate Punishment Program Operation Night Light

Treatment Court Team Members Judge/Judicial Staff Adult Probation Office District Attorney s Office Public Defender s Office TASC (CRN s and D&A Level of Care) SAM (Mental Health) CYS (Children Social Services) Reading Hospital (Primary Treatment) Domestic Relations BCPS Pre-Trial Bail Agency Easy Does It Halfway House YMCA Halfway House Berks County Prison

10 Key Components Key Component #1:Drug courts integrate alcohol and other drug treatment services with justice system case processing Key Component #2 Using a non-adversarial approach, prosecution and defense counsel promote public safety while protecting participants due process rights Key Component #3:Eligible participants are identified early and promptly placed in the drug court program Key Component #4: Drug courts provide access to a continuum of alcohol, drug, and other related treatment and rehabilitation services Key Component #5: Abstinence is monitored by frequent alcohol and other drug testing

10 Key Components cont. Key Component #6: A coordinated strategy governs drug court responses to participants compliance Key Component #7: Ongoing judicial interaction with each drug court participant is essential Key Component #8: Monitoring and evaluation measure the achievement of program goals and gauge effectiveness iv Key Component #9: Continuing interdisciplinary education promotes effective drug court planning, implementation, and operations Key Component #10: Forging partnerships among drug courts, public agencies, and community-based organizations generates local support and enhances drug court effectiveness

Berks County DUI Treatment Court

NHTSA/PennDOT Berks County was approached by PennDOT to participate in a National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) pilot project for DUI deterrents and judicial response to arrests in December 2002.

Our Response Berks County Court of Common Pleas responded by taking an intensive and precedent-setting look at DUI cases and developing more effective concepts for deterring offenders and rehabilitating those persons convicted of DUI crimes.

County Wide DUI Forum In March 2003 a County wide DUI Forum was held to identify both the positive and negative aspects of Berks County s DUI System. Attendees included Judges, District Justices, Probation/Parole Officers, Law Enforcement, Treatment Providers, and Legislative and Other Government Officials

Forum Outcome Goals Form multi-agency sobriety checkpoints DUI roving patrols Continue to expand DUI Enforcement Programs Increase programs of public information and education Develop DUI Benchmarks & Best Practices Implement a DUI Treatment Court

DUI Courts Provide essential, ongoing judicial interaction & intervention Offer a non-adversarial approach that protects due process and accountability Provide access to a continuum of community based services Require abstinence from Alcohol/Drugs which is closely monitored and tested Closely monitor compliance and sanctions for those who do not comply.

DUI Treatment Court Mission Statement- The DUI Treatment Court is a long-term program of judicial intervention, intensive probation/parole supervision, and treatment/counseling that focuses on reducing chemical dependency and subsequent recidivism of the chemically dependent DUI Offender.

Target Population The hard core drunk driver has been identified as the most dangerous offender. 58% of alcohol-related traffic fatalities in 2000 involved drivers with a BAC of.15% or above. On a national level it is estimated that 50% of first time DUI offenders and 80% of second or subsequent DUI offenders will be rearrested at some point for another DUI offense

Repeat Offenders Despite the fact that a high percentage of the DUI offender population is required to participate in drug and alcohol treatment through state licensed drug and alcohol providers, a significant percentage of this high risk population continues to be chemically dependent and continues to have involvement with the criminal justice system. The DUI Treatment Court Provides a new approach to an old problem The DUI Treatment Court Program provides the opportunity for a more comprehensive, intensive, and long term treatment experience.

DUI Treatment Court Goals & Objectives Reduce the number of alcohol related accidents and fatalities in Berks County Reduce the incidence of DUI Recidivism and other drug/alcohol related criminal offenses in Berks County

Hard Core Drunk Drivers The Century Council identifies the Hard Core Drunk Driver as the following 1. A driver with a BAC over.15% 2. Resistant to change 3. Has at least one prior DUI Offense

When is a Judge Not a Judge The DUI Treatment Court changes the Judge s traditional role to powerful motivator, confessor, task master, cheerleader, and mentor * Jeffrey Tauber, Drug Courts: A Judicial Manual

DUI Treatment Court Participation Criteria 1. 3 rd Offenders within 10 years 2. 3 rd or Subsequent Offenders Lifetime 3. DUI Offender (1 st or 2 nd within 10 years) with a history of chemical dependency 4. DUI Offender (1 st or 2 nd within 10 years) with a high prior record score and history of chemical dependency 5. After or in lieu of a Gagnon 1 Hearing

DUI Court Client Requirements Participation in the following is mandatory Ongoing D&A evaluation and treatment Involvement with the treatment community including AA Full-time Employment Participation in community based support services as needed Drug & Alcohol Testing

Sanctions, Including jail time and Community Service Work are imposed if an offender fails to comply.

3 Phases of Supervision 18-24 months total program length Intensive Probation & Judicial Supervision Weekly contact between Probation/Parole Officer and Treatment Providers Weekly breath/urine Drug & Alcohol Testing Multiple AA meetings every week

Outcome Data Berks County created a database for tracking and compiling Treatment Court Client s Statistical information This information is critical to determine the effectiveness of our program A comprehensive evaluation of our DUI Treatment Court is being Conducted by Jim Fell of Pacific Institute for Research and Evaluation (PIRE)

Our Control Group consists of those offenders who meet program criteria from the year 2002 who did NOT have the opportunity to participate in the DUI Treatment Court Program.

Our Commitment Berks County Court of Common Pleas in conjunction with Berks County s DUI Task Force is committed to Reducing the accidents, injuries and deaths Caused by the drinking driver

Berks County Drug Treatment Court Judge Peter W. Schmehl Brendan L. Harker APO

The Pilot Program for Drug/Mental Health Treatment Court began on January 3 rd, 2005. The Population consists of non-violent probation & parole violators with a history of substance abuse and/or addiction, mental illness, and/or new criminal charges

The caseload consists of 25 individuals, approximately 5 have been targeted for the mental health portion of the Court. Clients are referred based on the following criteria:

Court Criteria Active supervision with at least 18 months of supervision remaining Mental Health Clients must have at least 12 months of supervision remaining This time may be a combination of consecutive probations, remaining parole with probation to follow, or any combination that includes sentencing on a new charge

Court Criteria For Drug Treatment Court, client s must have a demonstrated chemical abuse and/or dependency problem. They may also carry a dual diagnosis For Mental Health Treatment Court, clients must have primary mental health diagnosis with or without a co-occurring chemical abuse and/or dependency problem

Court Criteria Clients must not presently be charged with a crime of violence or have ever been convicted or adjudicated delinquent of a crime of violence Client must be a Berks County resident Client must not be more appropriate for the Berks County Intermediate Punishment Program or the DUI Treatment Court Program

4 Phases of Drug Court Treatment Court consists of the following 4 phases and requirements. Promotions to subsequent phases are based on participants successfully meeting requirements listed under each phase. All participants will remain in the program for at least 18 months and all requirements apply to all participants.

Phase 1 (3-6 months) Phase 1 begins after the Court accepts the client into Treatment Court. This phase is designed to establish abstinence, medical and/or psychiatric stabilization and provide acute treatment, case management and supervision. Advancement from Phase 1 to Phase 2 can only occur after the participant has been in the program for a minimum of three (3) months, has completed all requirements successfully and has tested negative with no failure to test for at least thirty days prior to phase advancement.

Phase 1 Requirements cont. Develop and implement case management plan to include goals and objectives related to education, employment and/or other necessary services Secure approved living arrangements Establish a payment plan for legal fines and costs If applicable, establish a child support payment plan Secure gainful employment or participate in other approved use time Explore options for appropriate use of leisure time

Phase 2 (2-4 months) Phase 2 is designed to further recovery and demonstrate positive, productive lifestyle changes. Advancement from Phase 2 to Phase 3 can only occur after the participant has been in Phase 2 for a minimum of two (2) months, has completed all requirements successfully and has tested negative with no failure to test for at least forty-five (45) days prior to Advancement.

Phase 2 Requirements Exhibit Progress with case management plan goals Secure approved living arrangements Demonstrate consistent compliance with scheduled payment plans for legal fines and costs & child support Maintain gainful employment or continue in other approved use time Exhibit appropriate use of leisure time Maintain approved, stable living environment

Phase 3 (2-4 Months) Phase 3 is designed to solidify skills learned in the first two phases. Advancement from Phase 3 to Phase 4 can only occur after the participant has been in Phase 3 for a minimum of two (2) months, has completed all requirements successfully and has tested negative with no failure to test for at least sixty (60) days prior to phase advancement

Phase 3 Requirements Completion of case management plan goals Demonstrate consistent compliance with scheduled payment plans for legal fines and costs & child support Maintain gainful employment or continue in other approved use time Exhibit appropriate use of leisure time Maintain approved, stable living environment Completion of Phase 3 project Each participant must create a scrapbook consisting of photographs, and/or pictures cut out of magazines and narrative illustrating their life prior to treatment, i.e. active addiction and/or untreated mental health disorder (past), present life circumstances, and a vision of their life in the future.

Phase 4 (2-? Months) Phase 4 is designed to validate the participants progress and empower participants to grow in their recovery while decreasing their number of contacts with the Treatment Court Team In this Phase, participants will focus on transitioning from Treatment Court to their own recovery support systems Advancement from Phase 4 to Commencement can only occur after the participant has been in the Phase a minimum of 2 months, completed all Phase requirements, tested negative on all urinalysis with no failure to test

Phase 4 Requirements Demonstrate consistent compliance with scheduled payment plans for legal fines and costs & child support Maintain gainful employment or continue in other approved use time Exhibit appropriate use of leisure time Maintain approved, stable living environment Mentor new Treatment Court participants

Conditions for All Phases Maintain abstinence from alcohol and non-prescribed mood altering substances Regular appearances in Treatment Court Random home visits by APO with participants Regular contact with APO as directed Regular attendance & participation in 12-step meetings Comply with medication regiment as directed by prescribing physician Regular contact with Case Manager 2 times per week urinalysis/breathalyzer testing