CELLULAR IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR SEPTIC SHOCK: CISS Phase I Trial

Similar documents
Back to the Future: Updated Guidelines for Evaluation and Management of Adrenal Insufficiency in the Critically Ill

Evidence-Based. Management of Severe Sepsis. What is the BP Target?

Early Goal Directed Therapy in 2015: What Did the Big Trials Teach us?

Fluid Treatments in Sepsis: Meta-Analyses

EFFECT OF EARLY VASOPRESSIN VS NOREPINEPHRINE ON KIDNEY FAILURE IN PATIENTS WITH SEPTIC SHOCK. Alexandria Rydz

Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016

Transfusion for the sickest ICU patients: Are there unanswered questions?

Outcomes From Severe ARDS Managed Without ECMO. Roy Brower, MD Johns Hopkins University Critical Care Canada Forum Toronto November 1, 2016

NIV in hypoxemic patients

What is the right fluid to use?

Assessing thrombocytopenia in the intensive care unit: The past, present, and future

Is nosocomial infection the major cause of death in sepsis?

Disclosures Paul Walker MD PhD FRCSC

Morris A. Blajchman, MD, FRCP(C) Emeritus Professor, McMaster University Hamilton, Ontario, CANADA

Outcome of patients with hematologic malignancy admitted to the ICU

Approach to Severe Sepsis. Jan Hau Lee, MBBS, MRCPCH. MCI Children s Intensive Care Unit KK Women s and Children's Hospital, Singapore

Impact of Fluids in Children with Acute Lung Injury

Early-goal-directed therapy and protocolised treatment in septic shock

EARLY GOAL DIRECTED THERAPY : seminaires iris. Etat des lieux en Daniel De Backer

Vasopressors in Septic Shock. Keith R. Walley, MD St. Paul s Hospital University of British Columbia Vancouver, Canada

Extubation Failure & Delay in Brain-Injured Patients

Sepsis Management: Past, Present, and Future

Elizabeth Parsons, MD Senior Fellow, Division of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine University of Washington, Seattle WA

University of Pittsburgh Critical Care Medicine

Clinically Important Outcomes in ICU research

Sepsis 3.0: The Impact on Quality Improvement Programs

Sepsis. Reliability- can we achieve Dr Ron Daniels

Steroid in Paediatric Sepsis. Dr Pon Kah Min Hospital Pulau Pinang

Clinical Trial Insight: cell and gene therapy

In-hospital Care of the Post-Cardiac Arrest Patient. David A. Pearson, MD, FACEP, FAAEM Associate Program Director Department of Emergency Medicine

New Strategies in the Management of Patients with Severe Sepsis

Part 2 of park s Ventilator and ARDS slides for syllabus

Nothing to disclose 9/25/2017

9/25/2017. Nothing to disclose

What is the Role of Albumin in Sepsis? An Evidenced Based Affair. Justin Belsky MD PGY3 2/6/14

Anaemia in the ICU: Is there an alternative to using blood transfusion?

Update in Critical Care Medicine

ARDS during Neutropenia. D Mokart DAR IPC GRRRRROH 2010

Reporting Heterogeneity of Treatment Effect in Critical Care Trials

Red blood cell transfusions in the PICU: What & When

ARDS and Lung Protection

Effect of post-intubation hypotension on outcomes in major trauma patients

ASH 2011 aktualijos: MSC TPŠL gydyme. Mindaugas Stoškus VULSK HOTC MRMS

No conflicts of interest to disclose

Fluid Resuscitation and Monitoring in Sepsis. Deepa Gotur, MD, FCCP Anne Rain T. Brown, PharmD, BCPS

Reverse (fluid) resuscitation Should we be doing it? NAHLA IRTIZA ISMAIL

Diagnosis and Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock. Martin D. Black MD Concord Pulmonary Medicine Concord, New Hampshire

Disparities in the ICU: The Elderly? Shannon S. Carson, MD Associate Professor Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine University of North Carolina

Methodological co-investigators

How can human models of ALI inform clinical trials

Acute Lung Injury/ARDS. Disclosures. Overview. Acute Respiratory Failure 5/30/2014. Research funding: NIH, UCSF CTSI, Glaxo Smith Kline

MAKING SENSE OF IT ALL AUGUST 17

Sepsis: What Is It Really?

Intravenous Vitamin C. Severe Sepsis Acute Lung Injury

Actualités de la prise en charge hémodynamique initiale Daniel De Backer

SEPSIS RESULTING FROM PNEUMONIA FILE

Fluid balance and clinically relevant outcomes

CORTICOSTEROID USE IN SEPTIC SHOCK THE ONGOING DEBATE DIEM HO, PHARMD PGY1 PHARMACY RESIDENT VALLEY BAPTIST MEDICAL CENTER BROWNSVILLE

Fluid Resuscitation in Critically Ill Patients with Acute Kidney Injury (AKI)

The changing face of

The Berlin Definition: Does it fix anything?

Early Goal Directed Sedation In Critically Ill Patients

Severe β-lactam allergy. Alternative (use for mild-moderate β-lactam allergy) therapy

Nutrition and Sepsis

Transfusions in Acute Care Too Little?

Can Catheter Ablation of AF Reduce the Risk of Stroke? CCCEP 2015 October 31, 2015

How can the PiCCO improve protocolized care?

Early Goal-Directed Therapy

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3. Managing Acute Heart Failure Trials and Tribulations. Declaration of

When to start SPN in critically ill patients? Refereeravond IC

ICU Weakness: Molecular Mechanisms

The new ARDS definitions: what does it mean?

Pediatric Sepsis Treatment:

Sepsis Story At Intermountain Healthcare Intensive Medicine Clinical Program

Measure #164 (NQF 0129): Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG): Prolonged Intubation National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Opioid use in COPD: balancing benefits and harms. St. Michael s Hospital, University of Toronto

The Use of Metabolic Resuscitation in Sepsis

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI

Blood transfusions in sepsis, the elderly and patients with TBI

Recovery trajectories following critical illness: Can we really modify them? Tim Walsh Professor of Critical Care, Edinburgh University

LOKUN! I got stomach ache!

Brain under pressure Impact of vasopressors

The spectrum of clinical outcome of PE

Outcomes after administration of drotrecogin alfa in patients with severe sepsis at an urban safety net hospital.

Presented by: Indah Dwi Pratiwi

Wet Lungs Dry lungs Impact on Outcome in ARDS. Charlie Phillips MD Division of PCCM OHSU 2009

SEPSIS: IT ALL BEGINS WITH INFECTION. Theresa Posani, MS, RN, ACNS-BC, CCRN M/S CNS/Sepsis Coordinator Texas Health Harris Methodist Ft.

Dr. F Javier Belda Dept. Anesthesiology and Critical Care Hospital Clinico Universitario Valencia (Spain) Pulsion MAB

Sepsis: Identification and Management in an Acute Care Setting

John Park, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine

Exclusion Criteria 1. Operator or supervisor feels specific intra- procedural laryngoscopy device will be required.

Top 5 papers in clinical mycology

Pre-hospital Administration of Blood Products (PHBP) and Tranexamic acid (TXA): Is the Jury Still Out?

New Surveillance Definitions for VAP

3 papers from ED. counting sepsis sepsis 3 wet or dry?

Facilitating EndotracheaL Intubation by Laryngoscopy technique and Apneic Oxygenation Within the Intensive Care Unit (FELLOW)

Detecting and Removing Endotoxin in sepsis

Do Specialized Units Improve Outcomes?

Translational Medicine collaboration with TOWARDS RECOVER

Management of Clostridium Difficile: Total Colectomy versus Colon Sparing Surgery

Transcription:

CELLULAR IMMUNOTHERAPY FOR SEPTIC SHOCK: CISS Phase I Trial Lauralyn McIntyre, MD, FRCPC, MHSc Associate Professor, University of Ottawa Senior Scientist, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute CCCF MEETING, TORONTO, ON OCT 4, 2017

Disclosures Funding for CISS related work Stem Cell Network CIHR Ontario Institute for Regenerative Medicine Ontario Research Fund

Why study use of mesenchymal stromal cells for septic shock? 20% of all ICU admissions Mortality rate of 20-40% Long-term morbidity associated with physical, cognitive, and emotional dysfunction for survivors Estimated costs in USA: $24 billion/year Angus, D et al, NEJM, 2013: 369: 840-851; Martin, C et al, NEJ.M 2003: 348(16):1546-54; Levy, MM CCM, 2010: 38(2); 367-374; Lagu, T et al, CCM. 2012: 40(3); 754-61; Kaukonen, KM, JAMA, 2014. 311(13): 1308-16; Fleischmann, C et al, AJRCCM, 2016: 193(3): 259-72

Rationale for MSCs in Septic Shock Laroye et al, Stem Cells, 2017

Mei et al. AJRCCM,2010; 182(8): 1047-57 OR < 1 favors MSCs as compared to controls Lalu et al, elife, Nov, 2016

We performed an open label single-centre Phase I dose-escalation trial of freshly cultured adult allogenic bone marrow-derived MSCs in patients with septic shock to examine the safety and tolerability of MSCs in this clinical setting CISS framed as a rescue intervention

CISS Phase I Study Design CISS Observational Arm n = 21 CISS Interventional Arm n = 9 CISS eligibility met within 24 hours of ICU admission (additional 6 hours to enrolment) CISS eligibility met within 24 hours of ICU admission (additional 6 hours to enrolment) Consent Obtained 1 hour of pulmonary and hemodynamic stability Serial blood for inflammation At baseline, 1, 4, 12, 24, and 72 hours Record adverse events Low Dose (n = 3) 0.3 x 10 6 cells/kg Mid Dose (n = 3) 1.0 x 10 6 cells/kg High Dose (n = 3) 3.0 x 10 6 cells/kg * DSMC review after completion of each dose panel or as required L McIntyre et al, published online AJRCCM, Sept 29, 2017 Maximum Tolerated Dose Established for Phase II Trial

Eligibility Criteria Main inclusion criteria: Receipt of antibiotics and source control Adequate resuscitation endpoints (CVP 8 mmhg; ScV0 2 70%) Cardiovascular failure and At least 1 persistent or worsening organ failure or organ hypoperfusion Main exclusion criteria: Another dominant form of shock Severe chronic morbidities Immunesuppression History of malignancy in previous 2 years Non commitment to aggressive care (family/treating physician) L McIntyre et al, published online AJRCCM, Sept 29, 2017

Safety Outcomes MSC infusion events Life threatening hemodynamic or pulmonary instability up to 30 minutes post MSC infusion Expected serious adverse events Nosocomial infection - Pulmonary embolism Arrhythmias - Death 28/90 days Acute coronary syndrome - Re-admission to ICU Bleeding Serious unexpected adverse events Malignancy

Safety: Trial Suspension Criteria* Life threatening hemodynamic or pulmonary instability up to 30 minutes post MSC infusion OR Death within 24 hours after cessation of MSC infusion OR Serious unexpected adverse event * Event considered possibly/related to the study drug/protocol

CISS Baseline Characteristics Age* Sex, (female), No (%) APACHE II Score* MODS score Qualifying Organ Failure No (%) Respiratory Failure Hematologic Failure Renal Failure Organ Hypoperfusion Baseline Organ Support No (%) Vasoactive agents Ventilation Renal replacement therapy Observational Cohort (n = 21) 61 (23-95) 12 (57) 26 (17-32) 5 (1 15) 15 (71) 4 (19) 8 (38) 15 (71) 21 (100) 21 (100) 4 (19) Interventional Cohort (n = 9) 71 (38-91) 5 (56) 25 (11-28) 5 (3 10) 5 (56) 3 (33) 5 (56) 4 (44) 9 (100) 9 (100) 1 (11) * Median (Range) L McIntyre et al, published online AJRCCM, Sept 29, 2017

CISS Baseline Characteristics Infectious Source No (%) Lung Intra-abdominal Urinary Tract Other Observational Cohort (n = 21) 8 (38) 6 (29) 2 (10) 4 (19) Interventional Cohort (n = 9) 3 (33) 3 (33) 1 (11) 2 (22) Time to Enrolment* 19 (5 28) 24 (11 28) Dose of MSCs Received (range) Low dose (0.3 x 10 6 cells/kg) Mid dose (1.0 x 10 6 cells/kg) High dose (3.0 x 10 6 cells/kg) -- -- -- 19 30 80 86 132-250 * Median (Range) L McIntyre et al, published online AJRCCM, Sept 29, 2017

Safety Outcomes No MSC infusion related serious adverse events or deaths in first 24 hours post MSC infusion No serious unexpected adverse events No safety signals for physiological measures first 72 hours Mean arterial pressure Heart rate P/F ratios Oxygenation index MODS scores first 7 days

Expected Serious Adverse Events Observational Cohort (n = 21) Interventional Cohort (n = 9) *No (%: 95%CI) Nosocomial bacterial infection 10 (48: 24-71) 2 (22: 0-56) Nosocomial fungal infection 5 (24: 4-44) 3 (33: 0-72) Clinically important bleeding 3 (14: 0-31) 2 (22: 0-56) Acute coronary syndrome 2 (10: 0-23) 0 (0) Tachy/bradyarrythmias 3 (14: 0-31) 4 (44: 4-85) Pulmonary embolism (PE) 2 (10: 0-23) **0(0) * Events monitored for first 28 days ** 1 event occurred 32 days post MSC infusion L McIntyre et al, published online AJRCCM, Sept 29, 2017

Clinical Outcomes Observational Cohort (n = 21) Interventional Cohort (n = 9) Temperature (post-pre) Infusion* 0 (-1 to 0.8) 0 (-0.9 to 0.7) Mortality No (%: 95%CI) ICU 90 days 4 (19: 1-37) 4 (19: 1-37) 2 (22: 0-56) 2 (22: 0-56) ICU length of stay (survivors)* Hospital length of stay (survivors) * ICU re-admission No (%) 13 (4-50) 12 (7-30) 21 (4-100) 29 (10-58) 3 (14) 0 (0) * Median (Range) L McIntyre et al, published online AJRCCM, Sept 29, 2017

Conclusion Infusion of MSCs into participants with septic shock to a dose of 3 million cells/kg appears safe Recruitment into trial is feasible 0.6 to 1.0 patients per month Logistical challenges having freshly cultured product Funding secured to initiate a Canadian multi-centre phase II RCT

Translational/Manufacturing Clinical Team CISS Team Background/Methods

Acknowledgements CISS Executive Committee Duncan Stewart - Brent Winston Dean Fergusson - Claudia dos Santos Shirley Mei - John Granton David Courtman - Shane English John Marshall - Alies Maybee Keith Walley Canadian Critical Care Trials Group Canadian Critical Care Translational Biology Group Michael Matthay

CISS MSCs Bone marrow derived, allogeneic, freshly cultured MSCs 1 bone marrow donor Characterized for identity (tri-lineage differentiation, cell surface marker expression), sterility, genetic stability, potency Pre-specified release criteria Viability of final cell product ranged from 89.4% to 96.3% L McIntyre et al, published online AJRCCM, Sept 29, 2017

Time Course Plasma Cytokine Levels ANGPT 2 RAGE IL-10 IL-1β IL-6 TNF-α (pg/ml) (pg/ml) (pg/ml) (pg/ml) (pg/ml) (pg/ml) Hours after Enrollment