Tel No: Web:

Similar documents
SpineCor Scoliosis Treatment for Children and Adults

SpineCor. Standard Treatment Protocol. Dynamic Corrective Brace. The. The SpineCorporation Limited All Rights Reserved (Version VII March 2007)

What is Scoliosis? What Causes Scoliosis?

Treatment of early adolescent idiopathic scoliosis using the SpineCor System

A Patient s Guide to Scoliosis

SpineCor a non-rigid brace for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis: post-treatment results

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Treatment Options. CallenChiro.com

A new concept for the non-invasive treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: The Corrective Movement ª principle integrated in the SpineCor System

Original Policy Date

Barbara Plewka 1, Marcin Sibiński 2, Marek Synder 2, Dariusz Witoński 3, Katarzyna Kołodziejczyk-Klimek 1, Michał Plewka 4 ONLY

Bracing for Scoliosis

Difference between Spinecor brace and Thoracolumbosacral orthosis for deformity correction and quality of life in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Scoliosis is measured in anteroposterior/ posteroanterior

Author s response to reviews

Electrical Stimulation for Scoliosis

Pediatric scoliosis. Patient and family guide to understanding

Exercises for Scoliosis within the braces and Brace modifications for exercises

Policy #: 464 Latest Review Date: July 2014

Scoliosis. About idiopathic scoliosis and its treatment. Patient and Family Education. What types of scoliosis are there?

Kentaro Yamane, Tomoyuki Takigawa, Masato Tanaka, Yoshihisa Sugimoto, Shinya Arataki, Toshifumi Ozaki

The effectiveness of combined bracing and exercise in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis based on SRS and SOSORT criteria: a prospective study

Interventions for Progressive Scoliosis

Corrective exercises in the treatment of Scoliosis. Nikos Karavidas, MSc, PT

Royal Manchester Children s Hospital. Scoliosis. Information For Parents and Carers

Interventions for Progressive Scoliosis. Description

dmo orthotics live your life.

Learning curve in 20 years of brace treatment F. Landauer

Scoliosis: Spinal Disorders in Children and Adults

ApiFix New minimal invasive method to treat Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Short fixation followed by Specific Physiotherapy Program

Spinal Orthotics in CP What can we do? Andrew Schneider Snr Orthotist BCH ROH

Effectiveness of the Rigo Chêneau versus Boston-style orthoses for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a retrospective study

Lyon bracing in adolescent females with thoracic idiopathic scoliosis: a prospective study based on SRS and SOSORT criteria

Policy Number: MCR-067 Revision Date(s): 6/29/12, 9/17/14 This MCR is no longer scheduled for revisions.

10/9/2017 POST OP CARE OF THE PEDIATRIC SPINE PATIENT OBJECTIVES DEFINITION OF SCOLIOSIS CAUSES TYPES

The spine has 3 slight curves: Neck Upper back Lower back

Advances in Scoliosis Brace Treatment for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Sabrina Donzelli 1*, Fabio Zaina 1, Monia Lusini 1, Salvatore Minnella 1 and Stefano Negrini 2,3

18th International Scientific Meeting of the VCFS Educational Foundation Steven M. Reich, MD. July 15-17, 2011 New Brunswick, New Jersey USA

Clinical Significance of Strap Tension Adjustment on Spinal Orthoses for Neuromuscular Scoliosis

The Wilmington Brace in the Treatment of. Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Demonstration of active Side Shift Type1(Mirror Image ) in Right (Major) Thoracic curve.

Does bracing affect the quality of life of the patients with idiopathic scoliosis?

Facts about Scoliosis

Cruciform anterior spinal hyperextension (CASH) brace with round anterior chest pads.

SCOLIOSIS: COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF SURGERY

Effect of an elongation bending derotation brace on the infantile or juvenile scoliosis

Gregory M Yoshida, MD. Lateral curvature of the spine in the coronal plane > 10 degrees on an upright film

Idiopathic scoliosis Thriasio General Hospital

Results of Milwaukee and Boston Braces with or without Metal Marker Around Pads in Patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis

Idiopathic Scoliosis. SPORC Mar 2017 Neil Saran, MD, MHSc, FRCSC

State of the art spinal bracing manufactured at our Sheffield facility. Atlas Spinal Range

Debate: School Screening for Scoliosis Should be Abandoned

Comparison of in-and outpatients protocols for providence night time only bracing in AIS patients compliance and satisfaction

Effects of Bracing in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis

Effects of Bracing in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis

Guided Exercise for the Treatment of Scoliosis COPYRIGHT U.S. SPINE AND SPORT 1

Brace Management in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a 3D spinal

Author's response to reviews

Effects of Bracing in Adolescents with Idiopathic Scoliosis

Editorial on Screening for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: US preventive services task force recommendation statement

Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Clinical Policy Title: Spinal orthoses (back braces)

Materials and Methods

Casting for Early Onset Scoliosis Jim Sanders, MD University of Rochester. Background:

Case report. Open Access. Abstract

Bracing Effects of the Flexpine in Scoliosis Patients

OT and People Living with Scoliosis and Undermineralized Bones. Katie Ramin OCC 616

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is an abnormal

Scoliosis classifications Adopted for Non operative Treatment. Manuel D. Rigo MD PhD Institut Elena Salvá Barcelona

Freih Odeh Abu Hassan

Scoliosis David S. Feldman, MD

Orthopaedics for the Primary Care Practitioner and Rehabilitation Therapist. Maureen Maciel, MD Shriners Hospital for Children Tampa, FL

General appearance examination

ASSESSMENT OF THE PRESSURE DEVELOPED BETWEEN SCOLIOSIS BRACE AND PATIENT S BODY AND EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVE TIME OF TREATMENT

we know scoliosis We practice in an environment of informed choice based on four principles Scoliosis treatment is tailored to the individual

The SOSORT Educational Committee

Early Onset Scoliosis

Improvement of curvature and deformity in a sample of patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis with specific exercises

Idiopathic scoliosis Scoliosis Deformities I 06

Advances in the Management of Scoliosis. What is Scoliosis?

AIS. Objectives. Early onset scoliosis (0-9) Scoliosis 9/12/2018. Scoliosis Nigel Price, MD John T. Anderson, MD. Purpose/Objectives:

Effects of Immobilization. N24 Pedi Musculoskeletal Spring 2012, Week 14. Cabrillo ADN/C. Madsen RN, MSN 1. Physical effects on other systems

EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF CHÊNEAU BRACE TREATMENT FOR IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS OWN OBSERVATIONS

Cervical Plating Lumbar Microdiscectomy SCOLIOSIS

Date: March 2007 Review date: recommended for review in 2009

Pediatric Spinal Evaluation for Scoliosis and Back Pain

PRESENTS 3-D TREATMENT OF SCOLIOSIS Basic Certification Course (C1)

SPINAL SCREENING TRAINING

Dr. Theodoros B Grivas MD, PhD

Pupils with Physical Disabilities. Scoliosis

Debate: School Screening for Scoliosis is Reasonable

The Side Shift Exercise School Presentation 2014 T.Betts

Treatment of scoliosis with spinal bracing in quadriplegic cerebral palsy

The Sforzesco brace and SPoRT concept: A brace to replace cast in worst curves

Muscle Activation Strategies and Symmetry of Spinal Loading in the Lumbar Spine With Scoliosis

Prior Authorization Review Panel MCO Policy Submission

Ultrasound-assisted brace casting for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis, IRSSD Best research paper 2014

Transcription:

SpineCor is a registered trademark of The SpineCorporation Limited 2006 The SpineCorporation Limited All rights reserved. No part of the contents of this document or any images therein may be reproduced or transmitted in any other form or by any means without the written permission of The SpineCorporation Limited. Tel No: +44 1246 455381 Email: info@spinecorporation.com Web: www.spinecor.com

SpineCor System The SpineCor System is based on a new etiopathogenic concept. This concept developed by a team of 65 researchers clearly identifi es the origins of idiopathic scoliosis and the drivers for progression. TREATMENT Neuro-musculo-skeletal dysfunction Minimise Growth asymmetry Postural disorganisation Reduce Scoliosis Spinal deformation Reduce Stabilise The SpineCor treatment approach targets the four key progression factors of idiopathic scoliosis: 1 Neuromuscular dysfunction 2 Growth Asymmetry 3 Postural disorganisation 4 Spinal deformation Whilst it is rarely possible to completely reverse a child s scoliosis, using the SpineCor Global approach to treatment, addressing all 4 of the key progression factors, it is possible to minimise or reduce these factors or stabilise the Scoliosis in 89% of cases.

v The therapeutic approach The SpineCor Therapeutic approach uses curve specifi c corrective movement strategies to dynamically open curves. 38 o 22 o Curve Type: RT Thoracic Type I Corrective Movement: RT Thoracic Type I Curve Reduction: Resulting from corrective movement alone. NO BRACE!

The SpineCor curve classifications and corrective movements are the result of many years of research. Corrective movements must be well understood by clinicians applying the brace. Substantial curve reduction can only be achieved by progressively overcorrecting the postural deformity. In brace curve reductions with the SpineCor Dynamic Corrective Brace are NOT comparable to those in rigid braces. SpineCor will generally show LESS reduction in treatment but GREATER stabile permanent reduction post treatment compared to rigid bracing. Scoliosis correction achieved by SpineCor treatment has been shown to be at least stabile in 93% of cases 5 years post treatment. 27% of patients actually continued to reduce their Cobb angles post treatment. Largely Cobb angles achieved in brace with SpineCor during treatment are sustained post treatment. Less than 5% of patients have demonstrated progression post treatment following the SpineCor treatment protocol. Treatment Indications Idiopathic curves Cobb angles 20 0-50 0. Risser 0-3 or Pre-Menarché. Obtaining Optimal Results SpineCor has shown to be beneficial in reducing and stabilising large curves in children with advanced skeletal maturity, however, optimal results will ALWAYS be achieved by early treatment. The percentage of curve improvement, stabilisation and worsening by SRS definitions have been shown in studies to be the same for patients 15 0-30 0 and 31 0-50 0 only the amount of correction changes. Given an overall therapeutic success of 89% (improvement/stabilisation of initial Cobb angle) the ultimate treatment outcome and potential to avoid surgery will always be better the earlier treatment is started. Of curves 20 0-29 0 with Risser 0 or 1 68% WILL progress. (Lonstein & Carlson) Early SpineCor with its high patient acceptability and no side effects should be considered for such curves. treatment

Diagnosis and practical application Patient The following case study follows the treatment of an adolescent female patient with idiopathic scoliosis whose initial presentation at 9 ½ years and Risser 0 was with a 36o right thoracic curve. Case Study The SpineCor Assistant Software (SAS V3) guides clinicians through the process of curve classification, brace fitting and follow-up. The SAS Software may be used by both prescribers and treatment providers and is easily installed on most computers. Brace fitting now requires no special tools, equipment or environment. Once familiar with the system brace fitting and setup time takes less than 1 hour. Brace follow-up adjustments are advised each 3 months. The process of reviewing the brace fitting and making any necessary adjustments takes less than 30 minutes. Overall clinical time for the brace provider is potentially less with SpineCor than with rigid bracing systems. Overall time for prescribers overseeing the treatment Patient C 9 ½ years old 36o Patient C 9 ½ years old 36o Clinical aspect before treatment Radiological aspect before treatment After evaluation of the patient s radiological, clinical and postural data she was classified as a Right Thoracic Type 1 according to the SpineCor classification. should be no different to that required for patients under rigid bracing treatment. X-ray reviews are advised each 6 months to safely monitor treatment in the brace (after initial diagnostic and fitting confirmation x-rays). Patient C Wearing SpineCor Brace Set-up for Right Thoracic Type I Patient C - Corrective Movement Right Thoracic Type I

Diagnosis and practical application Patient The following case study follows the treatment of an adolescent female patient with idiopathic scoliosis whose initial presentation at 9 ½ years and Risser 0 was with a 36o right thoracic curve. Case Study The SpineCor Assistant Software (SAS V3) guides clinicians through the process of curve classification, brace fitting and follow-up. The SAS Software may be used by both prescribers and treatment providers and is easily installed on most computers. Brace fitting now requires no special tools, equipment or environment. Once familiar with the system brace fitting and setup time takes less than 1 hour. Brace follow-up adjustments are advised each 3 months. The process of reviewing the brace fitting and making any necessary adjustments takes less than 30 minutes. Overall clinical time for the brace provider is potentially less with SpineCor than with rigid bracing systems. Overall time for prescribers overseeing the treatment Patient C 9 ½ years old 36o Patient C 9 ½ years old 36o Clinical aspect before treatment Radiological aspect before treatment After evaluation of the patient s radiological, clinical and postural data she was classified as a Right Thoracic Type 1 according to the SpineCor classification. should be no different to that required for patients under rigid bracing treatment. X-ray reviews are advised each 6 months to safely monitor treatment in the brace (after initial diagnostic and fitting confirmation x-rays). Patient C Wearing SpineCor Brace Set-up for Right Thoracic Type I Patient C - Corrective Movement Right Thoracic Type I

Each SpineCor classification has a specific corrective movement strategy for progressive curve reduction. In the case of Right Thoracic Type I, the corrective movement is counter clockwise rotation of the thorax and clockwise rotation of the shoulder girdle. Patient C Day of Brace Fitting 24 o Patient C 6 months in Brace 4 o Corrective mov

Patient C After 15 months of Brace Treatment 2 o Without Brace in Place Patient C Clinical Aspect Before Treatment Patient C Clinical Aspect After Treatment Patient C s postural correction and Cobb angle reduction have been ement maintained 3 years post bracing.

Patient advantages Movement treatment allows and encourages normal activities, sports, dance, riding etc. Cosmesis easily worn underneath the patient s regular clothing for optimal cosmesis. Comfort cool to wear with minimal irritation. 4 hours break from treatment daily. Success 89% effective; clinically proven in a 400 patient 10 year study. A treatment with no side effects. Expenditure a cost effective treatment option. Easily worn under clothing Cool to wear with minimal irritation Treatment Duration & Weaning Average treatment duration for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis is 26 months. Bracing is not weaned before the following criteria are satisfi ed: i) Risser 4+ ii) 24 months post menarché iii) Minimum brace wearing duration of 18 months iv) With Brace and Without Brace x-rays show the same or very similar Cobb angles (5 o or less difference) Providing the above criteria are met the patient should have developed a neuromuscular integration of the corrective movement strategy to maintain a stabile curve. Long term 5 year post treatment studies show 93% of cases do not increase their Cobb angles from the point of weaning.

worldwide Treatment Results SpineCor is now used in 17 countries and over 100 treatment centers around the world. Data collected from 52 of these treatment centers show therapeutic success* in over 90%+ of Idiopathic Scoliosis patients. Due to the large variation of progression risk in patients with Idiopathic Scoliosis, comparison of different treatment methods has historically been very difficult. In 2006 The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) published guidelines for all future studies of Idiopathic Scoliosis treatments. The strict inclusion and exclusion criteria allowed study of only the highest progression risk group of patients. Together with Standardized outcome measures, the SRS guidelines make possible for the first time ever comparison of treatment methods. Since only the highest progression risk patients are studied, outcomes for all brace treatments are not as favourable as generally believed, however the first study in 2007 published in the Journal of Pediatric Orthopedics shows a very clear difference in outcome for three different treatment methods. Comparison Studies The treatments studied were: SpineCor -a flexible dynamic brace developed 15 years ago TLSO - (generic term for Boston type) rigid plastic spinal braces extensively used around the world for over 30 years Providence - a relatively new night-time-only rigid plastic brace used by a small number of clinics in the United States The results table below shows a dramatic difference in treatment outcomes, 15% success (by SRS definitions) with the most commonly used TLSO treatment versus 59% with the SpineCor dynamic corrective brace. SCOLIOSIS CURVE * TLSO * PROVIDENCE - SPINECOR Correction/Stabilisation 15% 31% 59% Progression over 6 85% 69% 41% Progression over 45 56% 45% 1% Progression to surgery 79% 60% 23% * Janicki J A, Poe-Kochert C, Armstrong DG, Thompson GH. A comparison of the Thoracolumbosacral Orthosis and Providence Orthosis in the Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis: Results using the New SRS Inclusion and Assessment Criteria for Bracing Studies. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Jun; 27(4):369-374. - Coillard C, Vachon V, Circo AB, Beausejour M, Rivard CH. Effectiveness of the SpineCor Brace Based on the New Standardized Criteria Proposed by the Scoliosis Research Society for Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop. 2007 Jun; 27(4):375-379. * Patients included in these studies range from 20-50 and Risser 0-3 or pre-menarché. Therapeutic success is defined according to the SRS definitions as either improvement (Cobb reduction of 6 or greater) and stabilization (Cobb increase of up to 5 ).

Systèmes de correction de la subluxation Subluxation correction systems www.posturetek.com 514.374.1001