DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results

Similar documents
Prospective, multicentre evaluation of the DESolve Novolimus-Eluting coronary BRS: imaging outcomes and 5Y clinical and imaging results

BIOFREEDOM: Polymer free Biolimus A9 eluting

Drug Filled Stent Optical Coherence Tomography Results from RevElution Trial Stent Strut Coverage and Stent Apposition

FANTOM II trial: Clinical results from the Fantom Sirolimus-Eluting BRS. Norbert Frey, MD University of Kiel, Germany

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

REFCTRI/2010/ CTRI Website URL -

Inspiron Stent. Clinical Research Program. Pedro A. Lemos MD PhD. Heart Institute InCor University of Sao Paulo Medical School Sao Paulo Brazil

FFR-guided Jailed Side Branch Intervention

Stephen G. Ellis, M.D. Professor of Medicine Director Invasive Services Co-Director Cardiac Gene Bank

Final Clinical and Angiographic Results From a Nationwide Registry of FIREBIRD Sirolimus- Eluting Stent: Firebird In China (FIC) Registry (PI R. Gao)

Are Asian Patients Different? - Updates Of Biomatrix Experience In Regional Settings: BEACON II (3 Yr F up) &

eluting Stents The SPIRIT Trials

Three-Year Clinical Outcomes with Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Scaffolds: Results from the Randomized ABSORB III Trial Stephen G.

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

EBC London 2013 Provisional SB stenting strategy with kissing balloon with Absorb

Insights from the Magmaris Clinical Data: BIOSOLVE II and BIOSOLVE III 12 Month Follow Up

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Bernard Chevalier Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France. Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Netherlands

Dr. Robert J. van Geuns. Thoraxcenter ErasmusMC Rotterdam On behalf of Dr. Jean Fajadet and Co-investigators

A Novel Low Pressure Self Expanding Nitinol Coronary Stent (vprotect): Device Design and FIH Experience

CYPHER (Polymer-based Sirolimus-eluting DES) New Stent Platforms. Campbell Rogers, M.D. Chief Technology Officer

Bifurcation stenting with BVS

PCI for Left Anterior Descending Artery Ostial Stenosis

Bioabsorbable Scaffolding: Technology and Clinical Update. PD Dr. Nicolas Diehm, MD, FESC Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Why I try to avoid side branch dilatation

A Polymer-Free Dual Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trial Versus Polymer-Based DES.

What Coronary Specialists Teach The Vascular Community About Vessel Prep? Tony Das, MD Texas Health, Dallas Dallas, Texas

Taking DES technology from concept to long term clinical evidence. Aurore Bouvier Global Product Manager Biosensors Europe

Late Loss Is The Single Best Parameter For Estimating Stent-Based Restenosis Resistance

SKG Congress, 2015 EVOLVE II. Stephan Windecker

Mid-term results from real-world REPARA registry. Felipe Hernandez, on behalf of the REPARA investigators

PCI for In-Stent Restenosis. CardioVascular Research Foundation

Biodegradable Stents An update and work-in

Protection of side branch is essential in treating bifurcation lesions: overview

Side branch occlusion in 500 ABSORB BVS

LM stenting - Cypher

OCT Technology: Differences between Biodegradable and Durable Polymers: Insights from the LEADERS Trial LEADERS OCT

Resolute in Bifurcation Lesions: Data from the RESOLUTE Clinical Program

Side Branch Occlusion

ReZolve2 Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffold Clinical Program Update

Results of TROFI II Study. Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD. Imperial college, London, UK On behalf of the PI s and the TROFI II investigators

Final Kissing Ballooning Returns? The analysis of COBIS II registry

Run-Lin Gao, MD, FACC. On Behalf of I-LOVE-IT Trial Investigators

In-Stent Restenosis. Can we kill it?

Bernard Chevalier Institut Jacques Cartier, Massy, France. Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Netherlands

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

New Generation Drug- Eluting Stent in Korea

Drug eluting stents. Where are we now and what can we expect in 2003? Tony Gershlick Leicester

Analysis of neointimal coverage after silolimus-eluting stent implantation using optical coherence tomography.

Prevention of Coronary Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis

PCI for Long Coronary Lesion

The BIO revolution: bioadsorbable stents. Federico Conrotto Cardiologia 2 Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino

DES In-stent Restenosis

C. W. Hamm, B. Cremers, H. Moellmann, S. Möbius-Winkler, U. Zeymer, M. Vrolix, S. Schneider, U. Dietz, M. Böhm, B. Scheller

Nobori Clinical Studies Up-dates. Gian Battista DANZI, M.D. Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico University of Milan, Italy

Βιοαποδομήσιμα Στεφανιαία Ικριώματα με βάση το μαγνήσιο. Magnesium Bioresorbable Coronary Scaffolds

Pathology of percutaneous interventions (PCI) in coronary arteries. Allard van der Wal, MD.PhD; Pathologie AMC, Amsterdam, NL

Evaluation COMBO s Healing Profile The EGO-COMBO Serial OCT Study

Insight from the CACTUS trial Coronary Bifurcation Application of the Crush

Neuestes aus der Therapie der pavk. beschichtete Stents + Ballons. Karls-University. Eberhard-Karls. of Tubingen Department of Diagnostic Radiology

Update from the Tryton IDE study

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

DECLARATION OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST

NOBORI 2 Trials One Year Clinical Outcomes

Bioabsorbable stents: early clinical results. Dr Angela Hoye MB ChB, PhD Senior Lecturer in Cardiology Hull & East Yorkshire Hospitals

2010 Korean Society of Cardiology Spring Scientific Session Korea Japan Joint Symposium. Seoul National University Hospital Cardiovascular Center

BIOFLOW V Comparison of UltraThin Sirolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Polymer with Thin Everolimus- Eluting Durable Polymer Stents

Disclosure Eberhard Grube, M.D.

Results of TROFI II Study. Patrick W. Serruys, MD, PhD. Imperial college, London, UK On behalf of the PI s and the TROFI II investigators

Biosensors Lunch Symposium

The SYNTAX-LE MANS Study

Bifurcation Stenting: IVUS and OCT Information

Element Clinical Program Perseus Late Breaking News and the Platinum Study Design

The PROSPECT Trial. A Natural History Study of Atherosclerosis Using Multimodality Intracoronary Imaging to Prospectively Identify Vulnerable Plaque

Second Generation Drug Eluting Stents: From Inhibition to Healing

DISCOVER Ultimaster with Optical Frequency Domain Imaging

IN-STENT RESTENOSIS. K.Boerlage-van Dijk CarVasZ 2014

TCTAP Upendra Kaul MD,DM,FACC,FSCAI,FAMS,FCSI

STENTYS for Le, Main Sten2ng. Carlo Briguori, MD, PhD Clinica Mediterranea Naples, Italy

Complex PCI. Your partner in complex PCI: In-stent restenosis (ISR)

Biolimus A9 Drug-Eluting Stents: Technical Aspects and a Comprehensive Review of the EU, Asia-Pacific, and US Clinical Trial Program

Unprotected LM intervention

Culprit Lesion Remodeling and Long-term (> 5years) Prognosis in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome

Tailored bifurcation therapy

Clinical Considerations for CTO

Medtronic Symposium The Complex Bifurcation Patient: new insights into stent selection

Patrick W. Serruys Imperial College, London, UK Erasmus University MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands

Non-LM bifurcation studies of importance in 2011

Bifurcations Bad Krozingen I

ZOMAXX I. B Chevalier For the ZOMAXX I Investigators ZOMAXX I

Declaration of conflict of interest. Nothing to disclose

Patrick W. Serruys MD. PhD. 1 Bernard Chevalier MD. 2 Yoshinobu Onuma MD. PhD. 3 on behalf of ABSORB II investigators

Le# main treatment with Stentys stent. Carlo Briguori, MD, PhD Clinica Mediterranea Naples, Italy

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Percutaneous Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Disease

6 th European Bifurcation Club October BUDAPEST. Kissing in simple strategy? Why and how I kiss. Y. Louvard, ICPS, Massy France

Dr Aniket Puri. OCT guided BVS for LMCA to LAD : Optimising the 'Pot'

INDEX 1 INTRODUCTION DEVICE DESCRIPTION CLINICAL PROGRAM FIRST-IN-MAN CLINICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE AMAZONIA SIR STENT...

Biolimus-Eluting Stent With Biodegradable Polymer Versus Sirolimus-Eluting Stent With Durable Polymer: A Randomised, Non-Inferiority Trial

Transcription:

DESolve NX Trial Clinical and Imaging Results Alexandre Abizaid, MD, PhD, Instituto Dante Pazzanese, Sao Paulo, Brazil On behalf of the DESolve Nx Trial Investigators

Please refer to the TCT2014 App or TCTMD.com for speaker disclosure information for this presentation

DESolve Nx Clinical Trial Design Clinical MACE Single de novo Coronary Artery Lesion Reference vessel diameter: 2.75-3.0mm Lesion length: <12mm, DAPT 12 months 3.0, 3.25, 3.5mm diameters; 14 and 18mm lengths 13 International Sites Europe, New Zealand and Brazil 126 patients 30d 6mo 1yr 1.5yr 2yr 3yr 4yr 5yr Angiographic IVUS, OCT, MSCT (subset) * Primary Endpoint: 6-month in-scaffold late lumen loss Secondary Endpoints: Clinical: Major Adverse Cardiac Events (cardiac death, target vessel MI, and clinically indicated TLR), Scaffold thrombosis QCA: In-segment late lumen loss, binary restenosis, and percent diameter stenosis IVUS: In-scaffold percent volume obstruction, malapposition OCT: In-scaffold percent obstruction, strut coverage MSCT: Percent diameter stenosis, lumen area *Single Centre Subset

DESolve Nx Clinical Trial Design Patient Follow-up and Baseline Characteristics Study Population N = 126; NL = 126 6 m Follow Up N = 120 (97.6%) N QCA = 113 (92%)* 6m Imaging Subset Follow Up N IVUS = 40 (87.0%) N OCT = 38 (83.0 %) 12 m Follow Up N = 119 (100%) 24 m Follow Up N = 116 (100%) 3 patients did not receive a study scaffold 1 Death 2 No contact** 7 No follow up QCA IVUS: 40/46 with paired analysis OCT: 38/46 patients with paired analysis 1 Death 2 Withdrew 3 Deaths (1 cardiac; 2 non-cardiac) *Patients who received a study scaffold **Patients returned for 12 month visit N=Number of Patients; N L =Number of lesions Patient Characteristics, % unless stated N = 126 Age, years (mean±sd) 62.0 ± 9.8 Male 68.3% Diabetes mellitus 21.4% Hypercholesterolemia 70.6% Hypertension 70.6% Previous MI 44.4% Previous PCI 35.7% Unstable Angina 12.7% Lesion Characteristics (mean ± SD), or % N L = 126 Lesion Length, mm 11.2 ± 3.8 AHA/ACC Lesion class B2 / C 34.0% Moderate / Heavy Calcification 18.3%

QCA Results In-Scaffold Analysis Baseline N L = 126 Post procedure N L = 122* 6 months N L = 113 RVD (mm) 3.00 ± 0.29 3.05 ± 0.25 2.96 ± 0.28 MLD (mm) 0.91 ± 0.38 2.64 ± 0.28 2.44 ± 0.43 Acute gain (mm) 1.72 ± 0.43 Acute Recoil (%) 6.4% LLL at 6-months (mm) 0.20 ± 0.32 Median Late Loss (mm) 0.11 (0.03, 0.19) Diameter Stenosis (%) 69.6 ± 12.1 13.2 ± 7.5 17.78 ± 13.23 In-Segment Binary Restenosis** n (%) 4 (3.5%) Values are mean ± SD; % (n), or Median (interquartile range 25%, 75%) MLD Minimum luminal diameter; LLL late lumen loss. *Modified Intent to Treat = those patients in which a scaffold was implanted in target lesion **In-Segment: In-scaffold + 5mm proximal and distal to scaffold; 3 cases of geographic miss

Binary Restenosis Cases pre pre Patient 42-09 6m post In-scaffold restenosis Geographic miss distal pre Geographic miss distal pre Patient 03-63 Patient 03-51 post 6m 6m post 6m Geographic miss proximal

Side Branch Analysis DS = diameter stenosis; PTCA = percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty; SB = side branch; TIMI = Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction

Side Branch Analysis 71 SBs >1.0 mm were analyzed in 123 coronary segments treated by 126 scaffolds The majority of SBs (68/71-96%) had pre-procedure TIMI 3 flow During the procedure, neither guide wire protection nor intervention was performed in any SB At post-procedure, SB TIMI flow 0 or 1 was detected in only 3 cases, representing 4% SB occlusion rate Importantly, there were no adverse clinical events during hospitalization associated with SB occlusion

Serial IVUS Results Scaffold and Lumen Area 5.86 5.90 6.78 6.43 No Late Acquired ISA No aneurysm formation N L = Number of lesions. Mean volume for patients with incomplete scaffold apposition (ISA), One patient with persistent ISA

Serial OCT Results Cross Sectional and Strut Level Analysis

Serial OCT Results NIH Thickness and Distribution IVUS resolution threshold Mean NIH Thickness: 100.53 ± 30.58 μm μm 530 100.5 120.0 80 90 200 200 240 330

Serial OCT Results Strut Coverage into Perspective 8.85 8.46 5.88 5.30 1.21 3.23 2.71 2.91 0.02 0.56

12-month MSCT Results In-scaffold Analysis 12-month Follow-up N = 41 Reference Diameter (mm) 2.9 ± 0.5 Minimal Lumen Diameter (mm) 2.3 ± 0.5 Mean Diameter Stenosis (%) 21.8 ± 12.3 Mean Lumen area (mm 2 ) 5.5 ± 2.2 Minimum Lumen area (mm 2 ) 4.8 ± 2.6 Reference area (mm 2 ) 7.3 ± 2.6 Mean area stenosis (%) 33.2 ± 17.8 MLD and % DS maintained between 6 and 12 months

Imaging Modalities Comparisons In-scaffold Analysis 12-month Follow-up N = 41 6-month QCA 6-month IVUS 6-month OCT Mean Reference Diameter (mm) 2.9 ± 0.5 3.0 ± 0.3 3.7 ± 0.8 n/a Mean Lumen Diameter (mm) 2.5 ± 0.5 2.9 ± 0.3 2.8 ± 0.3 2.7 ± 0.3 Mean Lumen area (mm 2 ) 5.5 ± 2.2 n/a 6.4 ± 1.2 5.8 ± 1.2 Minimum Lumen area (mm 2 ) 4.8 ± 2.6 n/a 4.7 ± 1.1 4.8 ± 1.0 Minimum Lumen Diameter (mm) 2.3 ± 0.5 2.5 ± 0.4 2.1 ± 0.3 2.4 ± 0.2 Mean area stenosis (%) 33.2 ± 17.8 n/a 26.1 ± 8.8 27.9 ± 10.7 Minimum lumen area and minimum lumen diameter maintained between 6 and 12 months

DESolve NX Clinical Trial Update Study Population N = 126; NL = 126 6 m Follow Up N = 120 (97.6%) N QCA = 113 (92%)* 6m Imaging Subset Follow Up N IVUS = 40 (87.0%) N OCT = 38 (83.0 %) 3 patients did not receive a study scaffold 1 Death 2 No contact** 7 No follow up QCA IVUS: 40/46 with paired analysis OCT: 38/46 patients with paired analysis Single Center 18 m Follow Up Subset N QCA = 19^ 12 m Follow Up N = 119 (100%) 24 m Follow Up N = 116 (100%) 1 Death 2 Withdrew 3 Deaths (1 cardiac; 2 non-cardiac) *Patients who received a study scaffold; **Patients returned for 12 month visit; ^MITT analysis

DESolve NX 18 Month QCA Single Center Subset (n=19)* 100 90 80 70 % of Lesions 60 50 40 30 20 10 LLL 6 months LLL 18 months 0 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00-0.50-1.00 LLL (mm) Mean LL at 6 mos: 0.25 Mean LL at 18 mos: 0.32 Mean change between 6 and 18 mos: 0.07 Median LL at 6 mos: 0.13 Median LL at 18 mos: 0.24 Median Change between 6 and 18 mos: 0.04 * Paired analyses

6 to 24-month Clinical Outcomes Hierarchical Events 0 to 720 days, n (%) 6M (N=122)* 12M (N=122)* 24M (N=122)* Major Adverse Cardiac Events 3.3% 5.7% 7.4% Cardiac Death** 1 (0.8%) 2 (1.6%) 3 (2.5%) Target vessel MI *** 1 (0.8%) 1 (0.8%) 1 (0.8% ) Q-wave MI 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) Non-Q- wave MI 1 (0.8%) 1 (0.8%) 1 (0.8%) Clinically Indicated-TLR PCI 2 (1.6%) 4 (3.3%) 5 (4.1 %) Definite Stent Thrombosis + 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) *Modified Intent to Treat = those patients in which a scaffold was implanted in target lesion **One death with probable ST based on ARC, scaffold undersized as assessed by IVUS; one death with suspected pulmonary embolus with right heart failure, non-scaffold related; one death due to non-target vessel occlusion and PCI, non-scaffold related ***MI during follow up attributed to multi modality imaging procedure + ARC-defined

DESolve Bioresorbable Scaffold Conclusions The DESolve Nx pivotal trial was successful in demonstrating safety and efficacy of the DESolve Scaffold Efficacy: Low 6-month late lumen loss by QCA at 0.21 ± 0.32 mm Low 6-month IVUS % Volume obstruction at 5% Low 6-month NIH thickness 0.10 mm by OCT Sustained neointimal suppression through 18 months Safety: Low 24-month MACE rate at 7.4% No late acquired ISA by IVUS / OCT at 6 months High percentage of strut coverage (98.8%) by OCT at 6 months Side branch occlusion was rate was low and not associated with adverse clinical events Clinical results mirror preclinical finding of vascular restoration within 6 months as evidenced by lumen growth