University of Georgia 2011 Global Perspectives Inventory Pilot Administration Results

Similar documents
Texas A&M University Texarkana. Global Perspective Inventory General Form Report

Midwest University. Global Perspective Inventory Study Abroad Form Report

Midwest University. Global Perspective Inventory New Student Report

Global Perspective Inventory (GPI) - Pilot Report

How Colleges Can Influence the

Global Perspective Inventory (GPI) Report

Assessing experiences and engagement that foster global learning and development. Chicago IL

Scales and Component Items March 2017

Assessing Individuals Global Perspective

Defining and assessing social responsibility as a study abroad outcome

2008 Ohio State University. Campus Climate Study. Prepared by. Student Life Research and Assessment

Published online: 17 Feb 2011.

China January 2009 International Business Trip Analysis

[ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT]

POLICY NAME: Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development STATUS: Recommended DATE OF REVIEW: September 2013

Thriving in College: The Role of Spirituality. Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University

DEAF STUDENTS CULTURAL IDENTITY AND PARTICIPATION IN A DEAF STUDIES COURSE

Taylor University s Intercultural Inventory Analysis. Presented by Natalie Nunes August 5, 2009

Developing a Global Perspective for Personal and Social Responsibility

BURSTED WOOD PRIMARY SCHOOL

VALUES IN THE CURRICULUM

Department of Psychological Sciences Learning Goals and Outcomes

Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development at The Grove Primary School

2013 First Year Experience Peer Mentor Position Description

GE SLO: Ethnic-Multicultural Studies Results

Flourishing and floundering students: Implications for identification and engagement

Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development Policy

International School of Turin

Spring 2017 Student Culture, Diversity, and Globalization Survey

A vida é a arte de encontros. apesar de tantos desencontros

Educational Kinesiology Foundation Requirements for Licensure as a Brain Gym Instructor/Consultant

ANGLO EUROPEAN SCHOOL

Examining Jamaican Teachers Global Perspectives: Prospects for Vision 2030 Jamaica

October ACPE Standards Revised 2016 Changes from ACPE Standards 2010 By The Standards Committee

Saint Thomas University

Illinois Wesleyan University

Running head: CULMINATION PAPER 1. Culmination Paper. Emily Romo. Azusa Pacific University

The Mosaic Project. Outdoor School Alumni Survey Report Brief. Evaluation Highlights

Arts and Entertainment. Ecology. Technology. History and Deaf Culture

Council on Education of the Deaf. Office of Program Accreditation. CED Program Review Evaluation Rubric

Garton on the Wolds CE (VC) Primary School Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development Policy

Service-Learning Student Evaluation Annual Report

FRASER RIVER COUNSELLING Practicum Performance Evaluation Form

Global Learning at Hope College Background, definitions, criteria

Impact of Participating in the Mind-Body Medicine Course on Empathy, Mindfulness and Well-being

Grand Valley State University

Study in psychology provides multiple perspectives

UA Student Well-Being: Gallup Survey Results

Syllabus for PSY 201-AD1 Principles of Psychology 3 Credit Hours Spring 2015

DEPARTMENT OF PROFESSIONAL COUNSELING UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN OSHKOSH OSHKOSH, WI Clinical Mental Health Counseling Intern Evaluation

THE CHARACTERISTICS OF THE GRADUATE AT GRADUATION

Indiana University-Purdue University-Fort Wayne

out that require some commentary. First, this notion of a culturally skilled counselor, based on

Department of Professional Counseling University of Wisconsin Oshkosh Oshkosh, WI Counseling Practicum Performance Evaluation

Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development Policy

The learning outcomes are colour coded to illustrate where the aspects of PSHE and Citizenship and SEAL are covered within the themes:

Chickering s Seven Vectors of Student Development Explained

EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY (EPSY)

Discovering Diversity Profile Group Report

POI How we express ourselves

Rady Children s Hospital- San Diego Child Life Practicum Application Checklist (Please enclose with application)

Two-Year Course Cycle. Department of Education Course Offerings. as of October 11, Academic Year

THE IMPACT OF EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF LANGUAGE LEARNING AND TEACHING

Florida Agricultural and Mechanical University First Year Experience Peer Mentor Program Application & Information Packet

Active Bystander Behavior: Extended Analysis from the Sexual Conduct: Culture and Respect Survey Tyler Anderson 16 Grinnell College

CEC Knowledge and Skill Base for All Beginning Special Education Teachers of Students Who Are Deaf and Hard of Hearing

ASL-ENGLISH INTERPRETER PREPARATION

Grade 3 Program: Shaping Up My Choices

Deaf Studies Program

1/16/18. Fostering Cultural Dexterity School Psychology Conference January 19, What is Cultural Dexterity in 2018? Workshop

REPORT ON EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE: GENERAL

Supporting people with dementia

ACTIVITY: Exploring Cultural Identity

Children learn to interact in relation to others with care, empathy and respect

United States Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association PRINCIPLES OF MULTICULTURAL PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION SERVICES Executive Summary

PROFESSIONAL MENTAL HEALTH COUNSELING

POLICY FOR SPIRITUAL, MORAL, SOCIAL & CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT

The learning outcomes are colour coded to illustrate where the aspects of PSHE and Citizenship and SEAL are covered within the themes:

SUPPORTING STUDENTS IN FSL

I. School of Liberal Arts Department of World Languages and Cultures

An Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Global Perspective Inventory. Kelli Samonte and Dena Pastor. James Madison University

2004 MAKING ACHIEVEMENT POSSIBLE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT

How does a prayer space in a school fit Curriculum for Excellence?

CHAPTER 3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY. In this chapter, research design, data collection, sampling frame and analysis

FOUNDATION YEAR FIELD PLACEMENT EVALUATION

Building Emotional Intelligence. Presented by: Andria Hill-Lehr

American Sign Language (ASL)

BEING A LEADER and LEADERSHIP

TTI Personal Talent Skills Inventory Emotional Intelligence Version

Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development policy

The Multi Institutional Study of Leadership University of San Diego Overall Findings from the Study

Georgia Aging and Disability Resource Connection (ADRC) Evaluation Report

Psychology Department Assessment

Who Became the Soldiers? Part 1

agencies that are affiliated with the Off-Campus Activities in Psychology Program (OAPP). New Students

Character Education Framework

International Education Project: What s Up With Culture? Module 1. Paul Dorres. AHE 599, Spring Professors Joe Hoff and Amy Nelson Green

FRATERNITY AND SORORITY LIFE

Definitions of Indicators

College Student Self-Assessment Survey (CSSAS)

Transcription:

University of Georgia 2011 Global Perspectives Inventory Pilot Administration Results Introduction/Administration In spring 2011, UGA piloted the Global Perspectives Inventory (GPI) as a potential tool to assess student learning and development regarding global and intercultural awareness, which are closely related to the desired learning outcomes for the World Languages and Culture portion of UGA s Core Curriculum Area IV (see Appendix A). The purpose of the pilot is to determine the GPI s effectiveness in answering two essential research questions about UGA students: 1. Do UGA students who have completed Area IV of the Core Curriculum indicate comparable or more developed perspectives on global and intercultural awareness than peers? 2. Do students completing Area IV of the Core Curriculum with different types of courses indicate different levels of developed perspectives on global and intercultural awareness than peers? The population of students sampled consisted of juniors who had already completed or were currently enrolled in their last course of the three required courses for this section of the Core Curriculum. The prospective respondents were divided into three subgroups according to the types of courses they completed to satisfy Area IV of the Core Curriculum: All language courses (Lang) No language courses (NL) A combination of language and humanities courses (Mix) There were approximately 250 students sampled in each subgroup. The survey was administered electronically and was open from April 19, 2011 through May 3, 2011. Personalized emails were sent to students in the targeted pool to request their participation. Students were asked to complete the survey online via a link included in the request email. Reminder emails were sent throughout the administration period. There was a very low response rate for the GPI with a total of only 64 students participating (Lang=25; NL=15; Mix=24). This small set of data does not lend itself to making general

statements regarding the subgroups sampled or the greater population of students at UGA. Following are brief observations of the data provided by the students who did respond. GPI domains Description The GPI results are organized into thematic domains, with measurement scales in each domain In Table 1, scales in bold represent those most closely aligned to the learning outcomes defined for the World Languages and Culture portion of UGA s Core Curriculum Area IV. The scores are reported for the three separate student subgroups, as described above, as well as the UGA mean of all students responding, and, for comparison, a Norm Group reported by the GPI. The norm group consists of students (N=973) at 16 public, doctoral level institutions who have taken the GPI over the last several years. Table 1. GPI Domains/scales (see Appendix B for definitions). GPI Domain Mix Lang NL UGA Mean Norm Group Cognitive Knowing 3.67 3.74 3.57 3.66 3.51 Cognitive Knowledge 3.68 3.87 3.72 3.76 3.72 Intrapersonal Identity 4.18 4.32 4.04 4.18 4.08 Intrapersonal Affect 3.73 3.92 3.58 3.74 3.81 Interpersonal Social Responsibility 3.69 3.83 3.6 3.71 3.67 Interpersonal Social Interaction 3.4 3.72 3.43 3.52 3.68 Well-Being 3.76 3.97 3.67 3.80 3.71 Global Citizenship 3.6 3.81 3.55 3.65 3.78 Observations The group of students who have taken all language courses to fulfill Area IV of the Core Curriculum scored higher in all domains when compared to the other two groups. Also worth noting is the overall UGA mean score when compared to the Norm Group. In most areas UGA respondents scored equal to or above the Norm Group. Among the domains most closely aligned with UGA s learning goals, UGA students scored equal to or above the Norm Group in four of the six, the exceptions being Intrapersonal Affect and Global Citizenship. Individual item responses Description

Although comparisons between the three UGA subgroups at the individual question level are not statistically reliable due to the low response rate, it may be useful to look at responses on the specific survey items most closely aligned with the learning outcomes defined for the World Languages and Culture portion of UGA s Core Curriculum Area IV. Knowing the response patterns in this pilot administration of the GPI can give a reference point for comparing data from future administrations. Tables 2a and 2b show how students responded to the items most directly related to the General Education Curriculum. Table 2a. Survey Items Aligned with UGA General Education Curriculum Level of Agreement (Strongly Agree Strongly Disagree) I take into account different perspectives before drawing conclusions about the world around me. I understand how various cultures of this world interact socially. I can discuss cultural differences from an informed perspective. % of Respondents SA A N D SD 37 51 9 3 17 55 19 9 15 54 22 8 1 I see myself as a global citizen. 18 46 28 8 I am accepting of people with different religious and spiritual traditions. I put the needs of others above my own personal wants. I consciously behave in terms of making a difference. I intentionally involve people from many cultural backgrounds in my life. I am able to take on various roles as appropriate in different cultural and ethnic settings. I consider different cultural perspectives when evaluating global problems. I know how to analyze the basic characteristics of a culture. I feel that my college/university community honors diversity and internationalism. 46 42 9 3 12 40 29 14 5 20 49 18 11 2 19 23 43 12 3 18 45 31 6 18 55 22 5 19 49 23 9 20 52 15 9 3

Table 2b. Survey Items Aligned with UGA General Education Curriculum How Many of Participation Events or activities sponsored by groups reflecting a cultural heritage different than your own Courses that include opportunities for intensive dialogue among students with different backgrounds and beliefs 4+ 3 2 1 No 14 11 19 27 30 11 8 24 29 29 Study/education abroad programs 29 71 Observations In the set of items related to global perspectives, strong majorities of UGA students agree or strongly agree with all the statements except the statement about intentionally engaging people from different cultural backgrounds. On this item, our students have a markedly more neutral response. In addition, the three questions directed at participation show that over 50% of student respondents reported that they participated for one term or less in coursework or activities that exposed them to other cultures. So while the majority of student respondents indicated that they feel comfortable interacting with and understanding other cultures, responses also indicate that most of our students may not choose to take advantage of opportunities to participate in multicultural activities beyond those required to satisfy one-semester school and college cultural diversity requirements. Conclusions/Next Steps Due to the low response rate, the GPI results from the Spring 2011 administration are inconclusive about the instrument s suitability for measuring UGA student attainment in Area IV of the UGA Core Curriculum. However, differences observed in the responses from the small number of students who did participate suggest that with more effective administration protocols, a higher response rate, and, perhaps, additional data from other sources, the GPI may provide useful information about student learning in this area. For this reason, the GPI will be administered again in spring 2012. The will revise methods for recruiting participants in order to encourage a higher response rate. Also, we will examine additional assessment measures that could be used in conjunction with the GPI to further confirm and illuminate student learning related to Area IV. A new administration plan based on the existing research questions will be presented to the General Education Working Group for feedback prior to implementation. Higher participation and the ability to compare or combine data from the 2011 administration will likely yield more conclusive and descriptive results.

Appendix A: From UGA Academic Affairs Policy Statement No. 14, General Education Curriculum (Effective Fall 2008) IV. World Languages and Culture, Humanities and the Arts (12 hours) World Languages, Culture, Literature, and the Arts will be characterized by an understanding and appreciation of the world from different linguistic, cultural, literary, and aesthetic perspectives. Participation in Language Communities, Practicum in Service Learning, and Study Abroad Programs are highly desirable components of the learning process that will enable students to communicate successfully in an increasingly cosmopolitan society, and to engage successfully and competently with a globally connected society. World Languages and Culture (9 hours) Ability to appreciate and respect commonality and diversity among people and cultures Ability to better understand one s own culture through the study of world cultures and different critical perspectives Ability to contribute to the well-being of a globally connected society Ability to apply linguistic skills and cultural knowledge acquired in the classroom to reallife situations Ability to understand that learning, especially language learning, is not a finite process, but a life-long commitment Ability to appreciate and pursue the common good over self-interest

Appendix B: From Interpretative Guide and Norms for Global Perspective Inventory (GPI) (November 2010) Description of GPI Domains & Scales Cognitive domain. Cognitive development is centered on one s knowledge and understanding of what is true and important to know. It includes viewing knowledge and knowing with greater complexity and taking into account multiple cultural perspectives. Reliance on external authorities to have absolute truth gives way to commitment in relativism when making commitments within the context of uncertainty. The two scales are: Knowing. Degree of complexity of one s view the importance of cultural context in judging what is important to know and value. (9 items) Knowledge. Degree of understanding and awareness of various cultures and their impact on our global society and level of proficiency in more than one language. (5 items) Intrapersonal domain. Intrapersonal development focuses on one becoming more aware of and integrating one s personal values and self-identity into one s personhood. It reflects one s sense of self-direction and purpose in one s life, becoming more self aware of one s strengths, values, and personal characteristics and sense of self, and viewing one s development in terms of one s self-identity. It incorporates different and often conflicting ideas about who one is living in an increasingly multicultural world. The two scales are: Identity. Level of awareness of one s unique identity and degree of acceptance of one s ethnic, racial, and gender dimensions of one s identity. (5 items) Affect. Level of respect for and acceptance of cultural perspectives different from one s own and degree of emotional confidence when living in complex situations, which reflects an emotional intelligence that is important in one s processing encounters with other cultures. (9 items) Interpersonal domain. Interpersonal development is centered on one s willingness to interact with persons with different social norms and cultural backgrounds, acceptance of others, and being comfortable when relating to others. It includes being able to view others differently; and relating to others in terms of moving from dependency to independence to interdependence, which is considered as the most mature perspective in effectively living in a global society. Social Responsibility. Level of interdependence and social concern for others. (6 items) Social Interactions. Degree of engagement with others who are different from oneself and degree of cultural sensitivity in living in pluralistic settings. (7 items) Well-being. Level of commitment to making difference in this world, working for the concerns of others, and having a purpose in life. (7 items) Global Citizenship. Level of understanding about cultural differences, identity as one who can interact with others from different cultures, and a self confidence in making a difference in this world. (10 items)