Midwest University. Global Perspective Inventory Study Abroad Form Report

Similar documents
Texas A&M University Texarkana. Global Perspective Inventory General Form Report

Midwest University. Global Perspective Inventory New Student Report

Scales and Component Items March 2017

University of Georgia 2011 Global Perspectives Inventory Pilot Administration Results

Assessing experiences and engagement that foster global learning and development. Chicago IL

How Colleges Can Influence the

Global Perspective Inventory (GPI) Report

Global Perspective Inventory (GPI) - Pilot Report

Published online: 17 Feb 2011.

Assessing Individuals Global Perspective

Defining and assessing social responsibility as a study abroad outcome

2008 Ohio State University. Campus Climate Study. Prepared by. Student Life Research and Assessment

GE SLO: Ethnic-Multicultural Studies Results

[ASSESSMENT DOCUMENT]

Wellness Assessment: Intellectual Wellness. Center for the Study of Student Life

EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY (EPSY)

Wellness Assessment: Spiritual Wellness. Center for the Study of Student Life

Running head: CULMINATION PAPER 1. Culmination Paper. Emily Romo. Azusa Pacific University

Click here to unlock TallPDF.NET

An Exploratory Factor Analysis of the Global Perspective Inventory. Kelli Samonte and Dena Pastor. James Madison University

1/16/18. Fostering Cultural Dexterity School Psychology Conference January 19, What is Cultural Dexterity in 2018? Workshop

Wellness Assessment: Creative Wellness. Center for the Study of Student Life

The Multi Institutional Study of Leadership University of San Diego Overall Findings from the Study

Wellness Assessment: Financial Wellness. Center for the Study of Student Life

Wellness Assessment: Examining International Students. Center for the Study of Student Life

The Relationship between Alcohol and Drug Use and Student Wellness. Center for the Study of Student Life

Dr. Jeanett Castellanos

2004 MAKING ACHIEVEMENT POSSIBLE SURVEY SUMMARY REPORT

ANN ARBOR PUBLIC SCHOOLS 2555 S. State Street Ann Arbor, MI www. a2schools.org Pioneer High School Annual Education Report (AER)!

POLICY NAME: Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development STATUS: Recommended DATE OF REVIEW: September 2013

PSY 361 PERSONALITY RESEARCH PROJECT THIS IS NOT THE OFFICIAL SURVEY USE THIS DOCUMENT TO FORM YOUR HYPOTHESES

Discovering Diversity Profile Group Report

Spring 2017 Student Culture, Diversity, and Globalization Survey

Saint Thomas University

Illinois Wesleyan University

Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development at The Grove Primary School

MISSOURI STATE UNIVERSITY DIVERSITY REPORT Degrees Awarded and Number of Completers Table 13. Degrees Awarded by CIP Family, Ethnicity and Fiscal Year

Grand Valley State University

B.A. IN PSYCHOLOGY. B.A. in Psychology 1. PSY 430 Advanced Psychopathology PSY 440 & PSY 441

Co-Cultures co- cultural

Indiana University-Purdue University-Fort Wayne

BURSTED WOOD PRIMARY SCHOOL

WHY THE OPPORTUNITY/ACHIEVEMENT GAPS ARE SO PERSISTENT AND WHAT WE CAN DO TO CLOSE THEM

China January 2009 International Business Trip Analysis

Developing a Global Perspective for Personal and Social Responsibility

Wellness Assessment :

Learning to See Clearly: Removing Blindspots from Organizational Behavior

Evaluators Perspectives on Research on Evaluation

Positive Education at GSLC Activities to explore character strengths at home

Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development Policy

FIU College of Business Administration (CBA) Faculty Climate Survey February, 2011

2013 First Year Experience Peer Mentor Position Description

School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Providing Highly-Valued Service Through Leadership, Innovation, and Collaboration

CASE HISTORY (ADULT) Date form completed:

Assistant Superintendent of Business &

Emotional-Social Intelligence Index

FORGIVENESS HUMANITY LOVE KINDNESS SOCIAL INTELLIGENCE JUSTICE ! FAIRNESS TEAMWORK. (Mercy) (Capacity to Love and Be Loved)

Impact of Participating in the Mind-Body Medicine Course on Empathy, Mindfulness and Well-being

10/22/2007 EDPY 442: INTRODUCTION TO COUNSELLING POINTS TO CONSIDER AND REFLECT ON... WHAT IS CULTURE?

School / District Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Global Learning at Hope College Background, definitions, criteria

Examining Jamaican Teachers Global Perspectives: Prospects for Vision 2030 Jamaica

Just the FACTS: You can help! Join the NMDP Registry. Vital Statistics

Agenda. Introduction and Overview. Self Assessment. The Experiences of Male Students of Color (MOC) Attitudes Towards Mental Health Services

Sample Report. Sample Report Report. Fa c i l i tat or s (05/13) 180

Study in psychology provides multiple perspectives

Thriving in College: The Role of Spirituality. Laurie A. Schreiner, Ph.D. Azusa Pacific University

Spiritual, moral, social and cultural development policy

School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter

Character Education Framework

2015 HEDS Sexual Assault Climate Survey

AQ Intervention for Assessing and Counseling Students of Color

May 15, Dear Parents and Community Members:

The Relationship between Fraternity Recruitment Experiences, Perceptions of Fraternity Life, and Self-Esteem

Psychology Department Assessment

BEING A LEADER and LEADERSHIP

Garton on the Wolds CE (VC) Primary School Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development Policy

MACOMB MONTESSORI ACADEMY School Annual Education Report (AER) Cover Letter - REVISED

overview of presentation

THE EMERGE SURVEY ON TAKING PART IN BIOBANK RESEARCH: VERSION A

HIV/AIDS AND CULTURAL COMPETENCY

REPORT ON EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE QUESTIONNAIRE: GENERAL

SAMPLE PATIENT SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

SUNY Potsdam Administrative Unit Assessment Plan. Unit Contact -- Name: Gena Nelson Phone: Address:

Discovering Diversity Profile Individual Report

Spiritual, Moral, Social and Cultural Development Policy

Consider Culture at all Levels : The Challenges of Social Work in Educational Settings

EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE COLLEGE AMONG TEACHERS IN COIMBATORE

Survey results in the order the questions appear on the actual survey

United States Psychiatric Rehabilitation Association PRINCIPLES OF MULTICULTURAL PSYCHIATRIC REHABILITATION SERVICES Executive Summary

PSYCHOLOGY. The Psychology Major. Preparation for the Psychology Major. The Social Science Teaching Credential

Chapter 2. Contemporary Issues in Business Communication

POLICY FOR SPIRITUAL, MORAL, SOCIAL & CULTURAL DEVELOPMENT

Policy for spiritual, moral, social and cultural development

Helping Hands, Healing Hearts

Cal MediConnect Cultural Competency CMC Annual Training

C O MPILE D BY: INDIANA STATE UNIVERSITY, TERRE HAUTE, INDIANA

Total responses SMC workshop type. Scientists

Taylor University s Intercultural Inventory Analysis. Presented by Natalie Nunes August 5, 2009

Transcription:

Global Perspective Inventory Study Abroad Form Report March, 9 27

2 Introduction Thank you for participating in the Global Perspective Inventory (GPI). The Research Institute for Studies in Education (RISE) at Iowa State University would like to express our appreciation for your support, interest, and participation in the GPI. The GPI assesses a global and holistic view of student learning and development and the importance of the campus environment in fostering holistic student development. The GPI measures how students think; view themselves as people with cultural heritage; and relate to others from other cultures, backgrounds, and values. Your involvement, along with the involvement of other institutions, allows us to not only provide data for institutional improvement, but also continue exploration into interventions and strategies that will inform a national conversation on ways to strengthen global learning. The data in this report allow your campus to make empirically-informed decisions and improve your students' learning; the research emerging from this project informs good practice for the development of a global perspective for students. Along with this report, your institution receives a student dataset that can be used to contribute to understanding how experiences vary within and across groups, analyzing assets and gaps in curricular and co-curricular offerings, confirming or challenging existing beliefs about student experience, making decisions about resources and future areas of work, and enhancing the educational experience of students. Again, we thank you for your participation in this study, and we encourage your future involvement with the GPI. If you have any questions, please contact the RISE office at (55) 294-624 or email (gpi@iastate.edu). Sincerely, Robert D. Reason Professor of Education Iowa State University

Table of Contents Respondent Characteristics... 4 Respondent Characteristics (cont.)... 5 Global Perspective Inventory Scales... 6 Table : Cognitive Knowing... 8 Table 2: Cognitive Knowledge... 9 Table : Intrapersonal Affect... Table 4: Intrapersonal Identity... Table 5: Interpersonal Social Responsibility... 2 Table 6: Interpersonal Social Interaction... Table 7: Items Not Corresponding to a Scale... 4 Study Abroad Form Questions... 5 Table 8: Intercultural Wonderment... 6 Table 9: Study Abroad Experiences... 7 Table : Faculty and Staff Influences... 8 Table : Global Competence and Workplace Skills... 9 Table 2: Items Not Corresponding to a Scale... 2

4 Respondent Characteristics N Percent Gender Male 27 22 Female 95 78 Transgender/Gender nonconforming Rather Not Say Total 22 Class Year First Year Sophomore 28 2 Junior 8 Senior 54 44 Graduate Student 2 2 Total 22 Race American Indian Asian American/Asian 8 African-American/Black 4 Hispanic/Latino 7 4 Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander White/Caucasian 72 6 Multiracial 7 4 Total 2 American/International Student American student at an American college/university 5 94 Non-American student at an American college/university 7 6 Other Total 22

5 Respondent Characteristics (cont.) N Percent Parental Education Less than high school High school graduate 7 6 Some college 9 7 Associate's degree 2 Bachelor's degree 9 2 Some graduate school 5 4 Graduate degree (Master's, Doctorate, MD, JD, etc) 5 4 Do not know Total 22 Major Category Agriculture and Natural Resources Art and Humanities 9 6 Business 2 Communications or Journalism 2 7 Education or Social Work 2 Engineering Health and Medical Professions 9 Physical Sciences, Biological Sciences, or Mathematics 9 Social Science 25 Other Field 4 Total 22 Did you begin college at this institution? Yes 6 87 No 6 Total 22 Prior to this term, how many quarters or semesters have you studied abroad? None 4 A short term experience (summer/winter term) 52 4 One 6 5 Two 9 More than two 9 2 Total 22 Have you ever participated in a living-learning community? No 84 69 Yes 7 Total 2

6 Global Perspective Inventory Scales

7 GPI Scales The GPI measures global learning across three dimensions: cognitive, intrapersonal, and interpersonal. Cognitive Dimension. One's knowledge and understanding of what is true and important to know. From a global perspective taking viewpoint, it includes viewing knowledge and knowing with greater complexity and taking into account multiple cultural perspectives. Reliance on external authorities to have absolute truth gives way to commitment in relativism when making commitments within the context of uncertainty. Knowing Scale. Degree of complexity of one's views of the importance of cultural context in judging what is important to know and value. Knowledge Scale. Degree of understanding and awareness of various cultures and their impact on our global society and level of proficiency in more than one language. Intrapersonal Dimension. Intrapersonal development focuses on one becoming more aware of and integrating one's personal values and self-identity into one's personhood. From a global perspective taking viewpoint, it reflects one's sense of self-direction and purpose in one's life, becoming more self-aware of one's strengths, values, and personal characteristics and sense of self, and viewing one's development in terms of one's self-identity. It incorporates different and often conflicting ideas about who one is living in an increasingly multicultural world. Identity Scale. Level of awareness of one's unique identity and degree of acceptance of one's ethnic, racial, and gender dimensions of one's identity. Affect Scale. Level of respect for and acceptance of cultural perspectives different from one's own and degree of emotional confidence when living in complex situations, which reflects an 'emotional intelligence' that is important in one's processing encounters with other cultures. Interpersonal Dimension. Interpersonal development focuses on one willingness to interact with persons with different social norms and cultural backgrounds, acceptance of others, and being comfortable when relating to others. From a global perspective taking viewpoint, it includes being able to view others differently and relating to others in terms of moving from dependency to independence to interdependence, which is considered the most mature perspective in effectively living in a global society. Social Responsibility Scale. Level of interdependence and social concern for others. Social Interaction Scale. Degree of engagement with others who are different from oneself and degree of cultural sensitivity in living in pluralistic settings. Norms. For the purposes of this report, all national norms are calculated using data collected from the GPI Study Abroad Form since 25 (n = 99).

8 Table : Cognitive Knowing N Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Cognitive Knowing Scale.75.55.54.6 When I notice cultural differences, my culture tends to have the better approach. (R) 2 Some people have culture and others do not. 2 In different setting what is right and wrong is simple to determine. (R) I take into account different perspectives before drawing conclusions about the world around me. I consider different cultural perspectives when evaluating global problems. I rely primarily on authorities to determine what is true in the world. (R) I rarely question what I have been taught about the world around me. (R) 2 9 9 9 2 9 7% 57 47% 8 7% 6 28 2 Note: (R): Frequencies are reported as the question is asked. Item and scale means were calculated after reverse scoring. A higher mean indicates a more global perspective. Percentages may not equal because of rounding. 27% 4 4% 48 4 55 46% 66 55% 48 4 9% 4 28% 8 7% 5 29 24% 4 5 4% 24 2 64 54% 69 58% 6 8 7% 8 5% 7 6% 7 6% 47 9% 4 29% 4.2. 2.96.4 4.2..76.8.2. 2.94.2 4..6 4.9.7 4.4.65 4..7.55.97.4.5.88.95.49.

9 Table 2: Cognitive Knowledge N Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Cognitive Knowledge Scale.95.59.85.57 I am informed of current issues that impact international relations. I understand the reasons and causes of conflict among nations of different cultures. I understand how various cultures of this world interact socially. I know how to analyze the basic characteristics of a culture. I can discuss cultural differences from an informed perspective. 2 2 9 9 9 Note: (R): Frequencies are reported as the question is asked. Item and scale means were calculated after reverse scoring. A higher mean indicates a more global perspective. Percentages may not equal because of rounding. 7 6% 7 6% 6 5% 4 27 2 29 24% 2 9% 2 8% 5 59 49% 65 54% 59 5 69 58% 66 55% 27 2 9 6% 4 29% 2 9% 4 29%.88.82.78.82.8.77.77.8 4.4.76.9.74.92.75.82.7 4.9.74.97.75

Table : Intrapersonal Affect N Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Intrapersonal Affect Scale 4..49 4.9.55 I am sensitive to those who are discriminated against. I do not feel threatened emotionally when presented with multiple perspectives. I am accepting of people with different religious and spiritual traditions. I enjoy when my friends from other cultures teach me about our cultural differences. I am open to people who strive to live lives very different from my own life style. 2 2 2 2 2 Note: (R): Frequencies are reported as the question is asked. Item and scale means were calculated after reverse scoring. A higher mean indicates a more global perspective. Percentages may not equal because of rounding. 6 5 4% 4 4 49 4 66 55% 56 47% 52 4 67 56% 58 6 58 48% 64 5 6 4.8.67 4..8 4..7 4.8.8 4.4.62 4.4.68 4.5.57 4.28.7 4..7 4..7

Table 4: Intrapersonal Identity N Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Intrapersonal Identity Scale 4.6.54 4..52 I have a definite purpose in my life. 2 I can explain my personal values to people who are different from me. 2 I know who I am as a person. 2 I am willing to defend my own views when they differ from others. I put my beliefs into action by standing up for my principles. 2 9 I am developing a meaningful philosophy of life. 2 Note: (R): Frequencies are reported as the question is asked. Item and scale means were calculated after reverse scoring. A higher mean indicates a more global perspective. Percentages may not equal because of rounding. 5 4% 2 4 2 2 9% 7 6% 9 6% 7 4% 2 9% 4 4 6% 66 55% 6 5 7 58% 62 5 57 48% 5 4 47 9% 9 25% 28% 47 9% 4.4.87 4..89 4..62 4..65 4..7 4.5.78 4.4.72 4..7 4.7.7 4.2.7 4.24.72 4.7.74

2 Table 5: Interpersonal Social Responsibility N Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Interpersonal Social Responsibility Scale.9.52.78.57 I think of my life in terms of giving back to society. 2 I work for the rights of others. 9 I put the needs of others about my own personal wants. I consciously behave in terms of making a difference. Volunteering is not an important priority in my life. (R) 2 2 2 25 2 Note: (R): Frequencies are reported as the question is asked. Item and scale means were calculated after reverse scoring. A higher mean indicates a more global perspective. Percentages may not equal because of rounding. 5 4% 2 6 5 29 24% 27 2 28% 24 2 22 8% 56 47% 6 5 6 5 7 59% 8% 29 24% 29 24% 24 2 2 9%.89.85.8.88.97.76.7.78.88.75.88.79.96.68.86.76.78.95.66.6

Table 6: Interpersonal Social Interaction N Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Agree Interpersonal Social Interaction Scale.67.68.48.66 Most of my friends are from my own ethnic background. (R) I frequently interact with people from a race/ethnic group different from my own. I intentionally involve people from many cultural backgrounds in my life. I frequently interact with people from a country different from my own. 2 2 2 9 8% Note: (R): Frequencies are reported as the question is asked. Item and scale means were calculated after reverse scoring. A higher mean indicates a more global perspective. Percentages may not equal because of rounding. 25% 5 4% 9% 5 8 5% 8 7% 22 8% 28 24% 5 4 66 55% 5 44% 45 8% 2 4 4% 28% 26% 2.79.7 2.67. 4.9.74 4.4.84.88.95.66.89.77.98.57.97

4 Table 7: Items Not Corresponding to a Scale I feel threatened around people from backgrounds different from my own. (R) I often get out of my comfort zone to better understand myself. N 2 2 I see myself as a global citizen. 9 Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree 4 28% 65 54% 4 4 Agree 4 Note: (R): Frequencies are reported as the question is asked. Item and scale means were calculated after reverse scoring. A higher mean indicates a more global perspective. Percentages may not equal because of rounding. 7 6% 2 7% 2 7% 57 47% 47 9% 6 5 4 4..9 4.8.94 4..84.69.9 4.24.76.96.8

5 Study Abroad Form Questions

6 Table 8: Intercultural Wonderment N Never Rarely Sometimes Often Very Often Intercultural Wonderment Scale.4.4 2.65.9 How often did you interact with individuals from the host country outside of the classroom? How often did you feel immersed in the culture of the host country? How often did you intentionally push yourself out of your comfort zone? How often did you explore new habits and behaviors on your own while studying abroad? Note: Percentages may not equal because of rounding. 2 9 2 9 2 7 6% 4 25% 2 8% 2 9% 25 2 2 27% 28% 44 7% 45 8% 5 44% 58 49% 5 4 45 8%.9.97 2.54.2.9.9 2.7..8.8 2.68.28..85 2.67.27

7 Table 9: Study Abroad Experiences How often did you speak in the host country's language in non-language courses? N Never Rarely Sometimes Often 2 7 4% 25 2 2 8% 2 7% Very Often 7 2.29.45 2.25.64 How often did you speak in the host country's language outside of the classroom? 2 5 4% 2 25 2 26% 47 9% 2.86.7 2.48.54 How often did you reflect upon your experiences abroad through writing or journaling as part of a course requirement? 9 2 8% 5 27 2 28 24% 28 24% 2.2.4 2..48 How often have you shared or discussed with others your experiences abroad? 2 5 9 66 55%.4.7 2.9. Note: Percentages may not equal because of rounding.

8 Table : Faculty and Staff Influences I developed a strong relationship with one or more of my faculty while studying abroad. N 2 Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree 9 8% 22 8% 9 Agree 47 9%.98.5.56.2 The onsite staff abroad took a genuine interest in my development as a person. 8 2 5 4% 2 4 5% 58 49% 4.25.9.6.2 My interactions with the faculty shaped the way I understand the host culture. 7 2 9% 8 5% 5 4 7.94.99.6.5 My study abroad instructors challenged me and provided the support I needed for effective learning. 8 2 26 2 49 4 8.99.92.76. Note: Percentages may not equal because of rounding.

9 Table : Global Competence and Workplace Skills The hands-on experiences in my study abroad classes helped me learn more effectively. N 8 Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree 6 5% 8 5% 52 44% Agree 42 6% 4..84.84. My study abroad experience taught me what it means to be a globally competent person. 8 8 7% 9% 49 4 5 4 4.9.87.96.9 I have a better understanding of what skills and competencies are required in the global workplace. 8 8% 2 8% 48 4 6.88.2.88.6 My study abroad experience helped me develop communication skills that will benefit me in the workplace in the future. 8 4 5 48 4 5 4 4.2.85.97.9 As a result of my study abroad experience, I plan to get involved in professional and/or personal activities related to global issues. 8 6 4% 5 28 24% 8.7.8.65. Note: Percentages may not equal because of rounding.

2 Table 2: Items Not Corresponding to a Scale My study abroad experience 'changed my life.' 8 N Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree 4 2 7% 42 6% Agree 5 4 4.7.89.99.5 My pre-departure orientation was very useful in preparing me to fit into the host culture. 8 7 6% 6 4% 4 6% 6 6 4%.2.6.4.2 Note: Percentages may not equal because of rounding.

2 The Global Perspective Inventory was originally housed at The Global Perspective Institute, Inc., which was established in 28 to study and promote global holistic human development among college students. The Global Perspective Inventory was hosted by Central College in Pella, IA under the direction of Larry Braskamp until 25 when Iowa State began hosting the GPI.