ISSN X (Print) Research Article. *Corresponding author Jitendra Singh Yadav

Similar documents
The Present Scenario of Cholecystectomy

Predicting difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy by clinical, hematological and radiological evaluation

Pre-operative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Study of the degree of gall bladder wall thickness and its impact on outcomes following laparoscopic cholecystectomy in JSS Hospital

Pre-Operative Prediction of Difficult Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Using Clinical and Ultrasonographic Parameters.

Pre and per operative prediction of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy using clinical and ultrasonographic parameters

Predictive Factors for Difficult Surgery in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Chronic Cholecystitis

Study of post cholecystectomy biliary leakage and its management

Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2009), Vol. 7, No. 1, Issue 25, 26-30

Factors influencing the conversion of Laparoscopic to Open Cholecystectomy

Per-operative conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery: prospective study at JSS teaching hospital, Karnataka, India

In Woong Han 1, O Choel Kwon 1, Min Gu Oh 1, Yoo Shin Choi 2, and Seung Eun Lee 2. Departments of Surgery, Dongguk University College of Medicine 2

World Journal of Colorectal Surgery

Effect of Duration of Surgery on Liver Enzymes After Cholecystectomy: Safety or Duration

International Journal of Health Sciences and Research ISSN:

ISSN East Cent. Afr. J. surg

J of Evolution of Med and Dent Sci/ eissn , pissn / Vol. 4/ Issue 42/ May 25, 2015 Page 7258

Risk Factors for Conversion to Open Surgery in Patients With Acute Cholecystitis Undergoing Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

ISSN X (Print) Research Article. *Corresponding author Dr Neeraj Rajauriya

JMSCR Vol 05 Issue 12 Page December 2017

Comparative Study of Outcomes of Early Versus Interval Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Calculus Cholecystitis.

Subtotal cholecystectomy for complicated acute cholecystitis: a multicenter prospective observational study

A CASE REPORT OF SPONTANEOUS BILOMA - AN ENIGMATIC SURGICAL PROBLEM

JMSCR Volume 03 Issue 05 Page May 2015

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Retrospective Study

AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL AND PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE

Magnetic Resonance Cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) in a District General Hospital

Retrieval of Gallbladder through Subxiphoid V/S Supraumbilical Port in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy.

Management of biliary injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy N. Dayes Kings County Hospital Center & Long Island College Hospital 8/19/2010

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Patients With Previous Abdominal Surgery

Cholecystectomy in a patient with situs inversus

CLINICAL PRESENTATION AND RADIOLOGY QUIZ QUESTION

Cholelithiasis & cholecystitis

Information for Consent Cholecystectomy (Laparoscopic/Open) 膽囊切除術 ( 腹腔鏡 / 開放性 )

Evaluation of Complications Occurring in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: An Institutional Based Study

Biomedical Research 2017; 28 (15):

Evaluation of complications and conversion rate of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Rural Medical College

REFERRAL GUIDELINES: GALLSTONES

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Acute Cholecystitis :An Experience with 100 cases

Disclosures. Overview. Case 1. Common Bile Duct Sizes 10/14/2016. General GI + Advanced Endoscopy: NAFLD/Stones/Pancreatitis

A one-year study of cholelithiasis at a tertiary care hospital of South India

Objectives. Hepatobiliary Ultrasound: Anatomy, Technique, Pathology. RUQ: Normal Anatomy. Emergency Ultrasound: Gallbladder Location

ISSN East Cent. Afr. J. surg. (Online)

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy after Upper Abdominal Surgery : Is It Feasible Even after Gastrectomy?

Conversion to Open Cholecystectomy Implications of Decision Making. Mr.. Val Usatoff HPB Surgeon Alfred and Western Hospitals

The role of C-reactive protein as a predictor of difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy or its conversion

Bile Duct Injury during Lap Chole. Bile Duct Injury during cholecystectomy TOPICS. 1. Prevalence, mechanisms, prevention and diagnosis

Predictors of abnormalities on magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: is there a role when the biliary tree is normal on previous imaging?

Background. RUQ Ultrasound Normal, Recommend Clinical Correlation. Sohail R. Shah, MD, MSHA, FACS, FAAP Texas Children s Hosptial

Samir Deolekar, Bhushankumar A. Thakur*, Bhushan Jajoo, Parnika R. Shinde

Gender as a Factor in Conversion from Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy to Open Surgery

Management of Gallbladder Disease

Routine Testing of Liver Function Before and After Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: Is It Necessary?

Case Report Overlap of Acute Cholecystitis with Gallstones and Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Gallbladder in an Elderly Patient

The gallbladder is a digestive organ located under the right side of the liver and connected to the common bile duct.

Early View Article: Online published version of an accepted article before publication in the final form.

Original Article Conversion of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy To Open One? Pak Armed Forces Med J 2016; 66(1):117-21

A comparative study of laparoscopic (LC) vs. open cholecystectomy (OC) in a medical school of Bihar, India

Case Report Uncommon Mixed Type I and II Choledochal Cyst: An Indonesian Experience

The study of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and its conversion to open cholecystectomy: analysis of 100 cases in Navi Mumbai, India

EAST MULTICENTER STUDY PROPOSAL

The campaign on laboratory: focus on Gallstone Disease and ERCP

Abdominal Imaging. Gallbladder perforation: color Doppler findings

Appendix A: Summary of evidence from surveillance

Greater Manchester EUR Policy Statement on: Asymptomatic Gallstones GM Ref: GM061 Version: 0.2 (21 November 2018)

Gallstone ileus:diagnostic and therapeutic dilemma

Isolated Gallbladder Perforation in Cases of Blunt Trauma Abdomen

Disclosures. Extra-hepatic Biliary Disease and the Pancreas. Objectives. Pancreatitis 10/3/2018. No relevant financial disclosures to report

The Enormous Size of the Gallblader A Reason for Conversion to Open Surgery in Acute Cholecystitis

Evaluation of Efficacy of Two versus Three Ports Technique in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Comparative Analysis

ABDOMINAL WALL HAEMATOMA COMPLICATING LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY

Archives of Clinical. Conversion to open surgery in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Changing rates and reasons in geriatric patients

Certificate in Clinician Performed Ultrasound (CCPU) Syllabus. Biliary

Biliary Tree Ultrasound - In a nutshell. Pamela Parker Lead Sonographer

Research Article Surgically Resected Gall Bladder: Is Histopathology Needed for All?

Case Report Simultaneous Non-Traumatic Perforation of Right Hepatic Duct and Gallbladder: An Atypical Occurrence

Kathmandu University Medical Journal (2009), Vol. 7, No. 1, Issue 25, 16-20

Tata Memorial Centre s opinion is summarized as follows: 1. Given the type 1 stricture (as mentioned in the structured summary), assessment

Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Tube in Acute Cholecystitis: Our Experience in a Tertiary Center in Saudi Arabia

Gallstones and Cholecystectomy Information Sheet

Sharma Maneesh,Chaudhary Sanchit, Sharma Ratnakar, Mahajan Amit

Current Perspective of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acute Cholecystitis

Surveillance proposal consultation document

Laparoscopic cholecystectomyy

Abdominal ultrasound:

Cholecystectomy. Sarah Forsyth

Congenital dilatation of the common bile duct and pancreaticobiliary maljunction clinical implications

Indian Journal of Medical Research and Pharmaceutical Sciences July 2017;4(7) ISSN: ISSN: DOI: /zenodo Impact Factor: 3.

Rev. C.R Vol.1 Núm.1 e-issn

Laparoscopic Subtotal Cholecystectomy for Difficult Acute Calculous Cholecystitis

Longest and left-sided gallbladder

Pictorial review of Benign Biliary tract abnormality on MRCP/MRI Liver with Endoscopic (including splyglass) and Endoscopic Ultrasound correlation

Takuya SAKODA* ), Yoshiaki MURAKAMI, Naru KONDO, Kenichiro UEMURA, Yasushi HASHIMOTO, Naoya NAKAGAWA and Taijiro SUEDA ABSTRACT

Sex-related differences in predicting choledocholithiasis using current American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy risk criteria

Commissioning Policy Individual Funding Request

Biliary tree dilation - and now what?

Hepato-Pancreatico-Biliary Surgery. Dr. Ankur J. Shah. MS, DNB, MNAMS, MRCSEd (UK), FRCS (UK)

ERCP / PTC Surgical Laparoscopic vs open Timing and order of approach

Case Scenario 1. Discharge Summary

Transcription:

Scholars Journal of Applied Medical Sciences (SJAMS) Sch. J. App. Med. Sci., 2014; 2(3B):966-970 Scholars Academic and Scientific Publisher (An International Publisher for Academic and Scientific Resources) www.saspublisher.com ISSN 2320-6691 (Online) ISSN 2347-954X (Print) Research Article Study of Correlation of Preoperative Clinical, Laboratory, Sonological and Peroperative Findings in Gall Stone Disease Jitendra Singh Yadav 1*, Akshara Gupta 2, Prashant Shrivastava 3, Achal Gupta 4, Nikhil Chopra 5, Deepanshu Sharma 6 1,5,6 PG student, Department of Surgery, Gajara Raja Medical College, Gwalior (M.P.)-474009, India 2 Associate Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, Gajara Raja Medical College, Gwalior (M.P.)-474009, India 3 Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Gajara Raja Medical College, Gwalior (M.P.)-474009, India 4 Professor and Head, Department of Surgery, Gajara Raja Medical College, Gwalior (M.P.)-474009, India *Corresponding author Jitendra Singh Yadav Email: Abstract: Gallstone disease is the pathologic state of stones or calculi within the gall bladder lumen and biliary tree. A common digestive disorder worldwide, worldwide occurrence varies from 6-20%. The definitive management of symptomatic gallstones is surgical. The two surgical approaches are conventional and laparoscopic. Important intraoperative considerations during laparoscopic cholecystectomy include time taken for surgery, the degree of difficulty encountered during surgery and conversion to conventional/open cholecystectomy (OC). Most common reason for conversion to laparotomy (open through a midline or subcostal skin incision) is the inability to identify important anatomic structures due to distorted anatomy from previous surgeries, inflammation or anatomic anomalies/variations. Other potential causes for conversion are intraoperative complications (vascular, bowel or bile duct injury). It is helpful to determine the risk of conversion of an LC to OC beforehand. This may allow the patients to be better prepared for the surgery and to plan their absence from work. Also, such prediction may allow a surgeon to be better prepared, to take extra precautions to reduce intraoperative complications and to convert from LC to OC at an earlier stage. It may therefore, be useful to assess and determine reliable pre-operative factors which may predict the duration and degree of difficulty in performing cholecystectomy and may predict conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. The study was a prospective randomized study done in the department of surgery in our institution for a period of one year. Total 100 patients diagnosed with cholelithiasis and undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study. Patients were examined for a detailed preoperative history, physical examination and preoperative biochemical and radiological investigations and correlation to various peroperative parameters was done. It was concluded that properly performed preoperative workup might help to plan a better and laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Keywords: Gall stone disease, Cholecystectomy, Cholelithiasis, Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. INTRODUCTION Gallstone disease is the pathologic state of stones or calculi within the gall bladder lumen and biliary tree. A common digestive disorder worldwide, worldwide occurrence varies from 6-20%. The highest incidence is seen in Sweden, where 50% of the people have gall stones by the age of 70 years [1]. Patients with asymptomatic gallstones develop complications at an annual rate of 1-2%. In symptomatic patients, the complication rate increases to 1-3% [2]. The definitive management of symptomatic gallstones is surgical. The two surgical approaches are conventional and laparoscopic. First successful removal of gallbladder was done by Carl Langenbuch in 1882 for stone disease [5]. Attempts at laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) was started in the early 1980s and although the first documented laparoscopic cholecystectomy was performed by Erich Muhe in Germany in 1985 [6], number of workers credit Philip Mouret from France as pioneer of first human laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Important intraoperative considerations during laparoscopic cholecystectomy include time taken for surgery, the degree of difficulty encountered during surgery and conversion to conventional/open cholecystectomy (OC). Most common reason for conversion to laparotomy (open through a midline or subcostal skin incision) is the inability to identify important anatomic structures due to distorted anatomy from previous surgeries, inflammation or anatomic anomalies/variations. Other potential causes for conversion are intraoperative complications (vascular, bowel or bile duct injury). It is helpful to determine the risk of conversion of an LC to OC beforehand [3]. This 966

may allow the patients to be better prepared for the surgery and to plan their absence from work [4]. Also, such prediction may allow a surgeon to be better prepared, to take extra precautions to reduce intraoperative complications and to convert from LC to OC at an earlier stage. The problem lies in pre-operative identification of the subset of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis who may turn up in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and may subsequently require conversion to open cholecystectomy. It may therefore, be useful to assess and determine reliable pre-operative factors which may predict the duration and degree of difficulty in performing cholecystectomy and may predict conversion of laparoscopic to open cholecystectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS The study was a prospective randomized study done in the department of surgery in our institution for a period of one year. Total 100 patients diagnosed with cholelithiasis and undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study. Patients were kept fasting overnight and the surgery was performed under general anesthesia. The selected patients were explained well about the procedure and written informed consent was obtained. The patients were informed about the chance of conversion to open cholecystectomy. Pre-operative history taking included age of the patient in years, sex of the patient, duration of pain in right upper abdomen, whether the patient experienced pain abdomen in last fifteen days, history of jaundice, diabetes mellitus, pancreatitis, and history suggestive of acute cholecystitis. Pre-operative clinical examination included calculation of body mass index with the formula weight in kilogram divided by height of the patient in meter squared, palpation of gall bladder per abdominally and if tenderness was present in right hypochondrium. Pre-operative lab investigations apart from those necessary for fitness included blood sugar level (fasting) and estimation of serum enzyme levels of Serum Aspartate Transaminase (AST), Alanine Transaminase (ALT) and Alkaline phosphatase (ALP). The value was said to be deranged if it was outside the range for normal recommended. Pre-operative transabdominal sonography was done as a routine in the pre-operative workup. The patient were fasted overnight to see for maximal distension of the gall bladder. The ultrasonography was done on B mode, grey scale and real time scan with 3.5 MHz probe. It included number and size of gall stones in gall bladder, if the gall stones were impacted in gall bladder lumen, if the gall bladder was contracted with its wall thickness and evidence of fatty liver. The various pre-operative factors were correlated to the time taken peroperatively, per-operative difficulty encountered and conversion to open surgery. Also, various pre-operative ultrasonological findings were correlated with intraoperative findings. RESULTS Out of 100 patients included in the study, there were 8 male and 92 female patients with a mean age of 39.8 years. Out of 100 patients, 50 patients were operated between 45-60 minutes. 10 patients underwent surgery in less than 45 minutes, 40 patients underwent surgery in more than 60 minutes, out of which, in 5 patients (5%), the total time taken for surgery (calculated as start of abdominal port placement till the closure of port sites) was more than 75 minutes. The mean duration of surgery was 59.52 minutes. In 15(15%) of patients, the surgery was described as difficult by the operating surgeon based on one or more of the objective parameters, while it was easy in the rest of patients. In 9 (9%) patients, the laparoscopic surgery was not progressing satisfactorily and was converted to open approach. The reasons for conversion were dense adhesions in the Calot's triangle and intraoperative bleeding. The factors having a significant association with the duration of surgery were age of the patient, gender, last episode of pain abdomen <15 days prior to surgery, history of nausea, diabetes mellitus, cholecystitis, previous abdominal surgeries, BMI>30 kg/sq meter, clinically palpable gall bladder and increased gall bladder wall thickness on USG while the factors having a significant association with increased per-operative difficulty were age of the patient, gender, last episode of pain abdomen <15 days prior to surgery, history of jaundice, cholecystitis, previous abdominal surgeries, BMI>30 kg/sq meter and clinically palpable gall bladder (Table 1). Various pre -operative ultrasound findings were analysed and were compared with operative findings. The findings which were significantly correlated were impacted GB stones, increased wall thickness, empyema gall bladder, cystic duct stone erosion into CBD/adjacent structures and anatomical variations of cystic duct/cbd (Table 2). The only variable which was statistically correlated with conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery included impacted gall stones on pre operative USG. All other variables were statistically insignificant. 967

Variable Number of patients Table 1: Analysis of variables Patients with Significant/ increased Non duration of significant surgery Patients with increased difficulty of surgery Significant/ Not significant Age 100 20 Significant 15 Significant Gender Male-8 Male-5 Significant Male-3 Significant Female-92 Female-5 Female-09 Duration of pain 34 06 Non significant 09 Non significant abdomen > 6 months Pain abdomen within 24 10 Significant 07 Significant last 15 days of surgery History of nausea 52 17 Significant 13 Non significant History of jaundice 08 04 Non significant 01 Significant History of diabetes 06 03 Significant 01 Non significant mellitus History of 09 03 Significant 02 Significant cholecystitis History of pancreatitis 03 01 Non significant 01 Non significant History of previous 35 16 Significant 05 Significant abdominal surgeries History of 27 04 Non significant 03 Non significant hypertension History of other 25 11 Non significant 07 Non significant comorbidities Elevated BP 09 02 Non significant 02 Non significant BMI > 30 kg/sqm 12 10 Significant 02 Significant Palpable GB 03 03 Significant 01 Significant Right hypochondrium 29 06 Non significant 03 Non significant tenderness Elevated blood sugar 04 02 Non significant 00 Non significant Deranged RFT 19 02 Non significant 02 Non significant Deranged LFT 33 09 Non significant 06 Non significant Elevated ALP 11 01 Non significant 01 Non significant Single GB stone 21 01 Non significant 13 Non significant Impacted stones 06 02 Non significant 00 Non significant Largest stone > 11 02 Non significant 00 Non significant 2 cm Contracted GB 18 05 Non significant 03 Non significant GB wall thickness 18 07 Significant 05 Non significant >/equal to 4 mm Wall echo shadow 44 10 Non significant 09 Non significant Table 2: List of variables Sl. No. Variables 1. Impacted GB stones 2. Increased wall thickness 3. Empyema gall bladder 4. Cystic duct stone erosion into CBD/adjacent structures 5. Anatomical variations of Cystic duct/cbd DISCUSSION Cholecystectomy is the treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy remain the gold standard procedure. Laparoscopic approach can be technically difficult in some patients, which if identified pre-operatively or early during the surgery can certainly reduce the incidence of avoidable complication. Operation on the biliary tree are among the most common abdominal procedure performed. Gallstones are the common cause of biliary tract disease in adult. First described in 1882 by Langenbuch, Open Cholecystectomy (OC) has been the primary treatment of gallstone disease for the most of the past century. By 1993 the laparoscopic approach was declared the gold 968

standard by the National Institute of Health (NIH) consensus conference. Few important intraoperative considerations during laparoscopic cholecystectomy are duration and difficulty in performing the procedure and conversion to open cholecystectomy. The problem lies in pre-operative identification of the subset of patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis who may turn up in difficult laparoscopic cholecystectomy and may subsequently require conversion to open cholecystectomy. This study was done to assess various demographic, historical, clinical, biochemical and radiological factors, review the current literature available on this subject and to analyze the data to be able to predict factors which will influence the difficulty and time taken in performance of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and which may predict conversion of laparoscopic to open surgery. This study also analysed sonological findings with intra-operative findings. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS The following conclusion were drawn from the study- The incidence of symptomatic cholelithiasis is more in female than in males. As the age of patient increases, the mean peroperative duration as well as difficulty increases. The maximum mean per-operative duration and difficulty is in the age group of 65 years and above. A definite increase in operative duration and difficulty in seen in male patients. There is a definite and significant increase in duration of surgery in patients with frequent nausea and history of jaundice. The mean per-operative difficulty and duration is definitely higher in diabetics or patients with deranged blood sugar in pre-operative period. Patients with history of acute cholecystitis will have increased operative time and difficulty. Patients with history of previous abdominal surgeries (laparoscopic/open) will also have increased duration and difficulty in procedure. Obesity/ BMI>30 kg/sq meter is significantly associated with increased duration and difficulty of surgery. The mean per operative duration and difficulty is higher in those with clinically palpable gall bladder. This study has shown an increase in mean duration and difficulty in surgery in patients with multiple stones, contracted gall bladder and increased wall thickness, although a statistical significance could not be demonstrated. However, the mean peroperative difficulty does not alter with size, impaction of calculi in gall bladder or wall echo shadow sign. Increased duration or time taken during surgery may not be taken as a marker of a difficult surgery. It is usually possible to perform laparoscopic cholecystectomy without much difficulty by patient dissection. Measures to define the surgery "difficult" should be clearly and objectively defined and should be based on time taken during surgery. The average rate of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery is usually low. Impacted gallstone was the only independent variable which influences conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery. Recommendations The need for conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open approach should not be taken as a failure or a complication, but perceived as an attempt to avoid the undue complications. Patients with symptomatic cholelithiasis who wish to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy should be adequately counselled in the preoperative period. Adequate pre- operative preparation should be made accordingly and patient should be informed about the likelihood of extended postoperative hospital stay, conversion to open surgery, increased surgery time and increased post -operative care. Laparoscopic surgeons need to schedule their operation list according to the presumption of time taken for laparoscopic approach in a particular care and predicted per-operative difficulty and preparation for conversion to open surgery should be there. Although USG is a sensitive and adequate imaging modality for assessing the gall bladder wall, calculi and cystic duct anatomy, it is not a reliable imaging modality to assess intrahepatic lesion/ CBD and hence MRCP/ CECT/ Triple phase CT abdomen should be resorted to if there is a re-operative indication of intra-hepatic/ CBD delineation. Objective criteria should be defined to assess a surgery as difficult and time taken in performance of surgery should not be taken as a marker of difficult surgery. REFERENCES 1. Yoo EH, Lee SY; The prevalence and risk factors for gallstone disease. J Clin Chem Lab Med., 2009; 47(4): 795-807. 2. Glasgow RE, Cho M, Hutter MM, Mulvihill SJ; The spectrum and cost of complicated gallstone disease in California. Arch Surg., 2000; 135(9): 1021-1025. 3. Sanabria JR, Gallinger S, Croxford R, Strasberg SM; Risk factors in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy for conversion to open cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg., 1994; 179(6): 696-704. 969

4. Arregui ME, Davis CJ, Arkush A, Nagan RF; In selected patients outpatients laparoscopic cholecystectomy is safe and significantly reduces hospitalization charges. Surg Laparosc Endosc., 1991; 1(4): 240-245. 5. van Gulik TM; Langenbuch's cholecystectomy, once a remarkably controversial operation. Neth J Surg., 1986; 38(5): 138-141. 6. Jani K, Rajan PS, Sendhilkumar K, Palanivelu C; Twenty years after Erich Muhe: Persisting controversies with the gold standard of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Minim Access Surg., 2006; 2(2): 49 58. 970