Establishing Rules for: Medical Device Reports (803) & Correction and Removal Reports (806)

Similar documents
AFDO Conference June 9, Mercedes Mota, Director Medical Device, Surgical Care Johnson & Johnson Quality & Compliance Worldwide

FDA issues final guidance on benefit-risk factors to consider in medical device product availability, compliance, and enforcement decisions

BEST PRACTICE CHANGE CONTROL : DECIDING WHEN TO SUBMIT A 510(K) FOR A DEVICE CHANGE. Yuan Xu 18- JAN- 2018

Using Recall Data to Assess the 510(k) Process

2/17/2018. Prof. Steven S. Saliterman Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota

Prof. Steven S. Saliterman. Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Minnesota

Preparing a US FDA Medical Device 510(K) Submission

TOBACCO PRODUCT OR MEDICAL PRODUCT?

Medidée Services SA. Nano-Tera.ch. 05 February 2015 part 4. Intro ISO GMP - GLP Pierre-Alain Sommer

Residual Solvents: FDA/ Regulatory Perspective

September 28, Division of Dockets Management (HFA-305) Food and Drug Administration 5630 Fishers Lane, Room 1061 Rockville, MD 20852

510(k) submissions. Getting US FDA clearance for your device: Improving

Effective and Compliance Dates Applicable to Retailers, Manufacturers, Importers, and Distributors of Newly Deemed Tobacco Products

DETERMINING WHETHER AN ACTIVITY IS HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH AS DEFINED BY FEDERAL REGULATIONS

Draft Guidance for Industry and FDA Staff

Overview of the Legal Framework for Medical Device Regulation in the United States

Raritan Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 6/20/17

UNITED STATES REGULATION OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS. Presented by Mitch Zeller Center Director FDA Center for Tobacco Products

Medication errors. Impact of medication error guidance and regulation on drug-device combination products. June 2017 Dan Wozinski

Guidance for Industry

(Cochineal Extract and Carmine: Declaration by Name on the Label of All Foods and Cosmetic Products That Contain These Color Additives)

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and Budget

FDA 510(k) 101 The Basics

UPDATES FROM THE FDA CENTER FOR TOBACCO PRODUCTS (CTP)

Public Health Service Food and Drug Administration San Francisco District 1431 Harbor Bay Parkway Alameda, CA Telephone: 510/

Premarket Notification: Analysis of FDA Recall Data

Manual for Expedited Reporting of Adverse Events to DAIDS Version 2.0 January 2010

2014 FDA/JIFSAN Food & Nutrition Webinar

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and

Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission for Office of Management and

Use of Standards in Substantial Equivalence Determinations

Hieber's Pharmacy 12/5/17

LIVE INTERACTIVE YOUR DESKTOP. Food Recall Process. Cecilia M. Wolyniak Food and Drug Administration Office of Enforcement

General Wellness: Policy for Low Risk Devices Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Food and Drug Apini$r$iy -tq 5-f

RECALL / EVENT INVESTIGATION & PATIENT LOOK BACK

NRMP Reporting Requirements

Final Rules Preventive Controls for Human Food Preventive Controls for Animal Food

40 CFR PART DENTAL OFFICE POINT SOURCE CATEGORY

Town and Country Compounding and Consultation Services, LLC 10/17/17

Inspections, Compliance, Enforcement, and Criminal Investigations

SAMED Position: Reuse of SUDs

In Vitro Diagnostic Testing for Direct Oral Anticoagulants- Premarket Review

Standards of Conduct for Transmission Providers

Compliance with the Dental Rule in Virginia

Border Issues and Statistics: Regulatory Activities. Mr. Robert Deininger Southwest Import Director AFDO San Antonio, Texas

Children s Hospital of Philadelphia Committees for the Protection of Human Subjects Policies and Procedures Research That Must Be Reviewed by the IRB

Alignment of FSMA with Existing Food Safety Programs International Citrus & Beverage Conference

FDA Basics FDA s Import Operations: How FDA Regulates Imported Products

Stonegate Pharmacy LP 11/10/16

The Tobacco Control Act s Premarket Review Authorities: Reports on Substantial Equivalence and Exemption Requests (905(j))

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health. Preface

Key CDRH Regulatory Initiatives

Medical Device Approval and Product Recalls

On December 27, 2017, the Lieutenant Governor signed into law several new requirements

Family Smoking Prevention and Tobacco Control Act. Comments regarding crop protection agents

SFIREG Issue Paper: Pesticide Use on Cannabis State Established Pesticide Residue Action Levels

Guidance for Industry DRAFT GUIDANCE. This guidance document is being distributed for comment purposes only.

ContiTech North America

QA Regulatory forum: Classification and Risk assessment according to MDR Date : T h e r e s e. A l b i n s s o m e d q t e c h.

4/26/2013. Libia Lugo Drug Specialist San Juan District Office Investigations Branch

510(k) 21 Summary of Safety and Effectiveness

Guidance for the Network Review of Chemotherapy Errors

MIAMI CHILDREN S HOSPITAL POLICY AND PROCEDURE

PIC/S GUIDANCE ON CLASSIFICATION OF GMP DEFICIENCIES

July 10, X-spine Systems, Incorporated David Kirschman, MD Chief Medical Officer 452 Alexandersville Road Miamisburg, Ohio 45342


Informational Memo. Communication Assistance Compliance Standards for Individuals who are Deaf. ODP Communication Number: Memo

COMMON RULE 2019 IMPLEMENTATION DATE: JANUARY 21, 2019

Shawn Stevens Food Industry Consultant and Lawyer

Class II Special Controls Guidance Document: Intraoral Devices for Snoring and/or Obstructive Sleep Apnea; Guidance for Industry and FDA

Checklist of issues to be considered by food business operators when implementing Commission Regulation (EC) No 2073/2005

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND SENIOR SERVICES PO BOX 360 TRENTON, N.J

GOOD REGULATORY REVIEW PRACTICES WORKING GROUP UPDATE. Working Group Chair: Melissa Torres US Food and Drug Administration

Food Additives Program

Responsibilities of Laser Light Show Projector Manufacturers, Dealers, and Distributors; Final Guidance for Industry and FDA.

Primer: Medical Device User Fee Amendments Han Zhong l September 2011

Inter-Agency Overlap and Jurisdictional Boundaries

THE NON PENICILLIN BETA LACTAM DRUG CROSS CONTAMINATION PREVENTION; USFDA PERSPECTIVE

CDRH: 510(k)S AND SCIENCE IN REGULATOR DECISION-MAKING. lannery, Scott Danzis and Christopher Pruitt. November 2010 SPECIAL REPRINT

FDA Regulation of Diagnostic Tests Jeffrey N. Gibbs Hyman, Phelps & McNamara, P.C. Washington, DC

Eyewash and Safety Showers HM 20 Page 1

IAASB Main Agenda (March 2005) Page Agenda Item. DRAFT EXPLANATORY MEMORANDUM ISA 701 and ISA 702 Exposure Drafts February 2005

PROPOSED REGULATION OF THE BOARD OF HEARING AID SPECIALISTS. LCB File No. R July 6, 2001

CITY OF PALMER, ALASKA. Ordinance No

CERTIFICATE OF ANALYSIS. tel: fax:

Dear Valued Customer,

IMPLICATIONS OF THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL DIRECTIVE 2010/32/EU ON PHARMACY ASEPTIC PRACTICES IN THE UK

TGA: the current regulatory reform agenda

Current Good Manufacturing Practice, Hazard Analysis, and Risk-Based Preventive Controls for Human Food

Guidance - IDE Early/Expanded Access for Devices

The Basics of the U.S. FDA s Regulation of Materials Used in Food Packaging Applications

Al Garcia. CIPCA October 12, 2018

Regulatory Update: Food Safety and Nutrition

Listing of Color Additives Exempt from Certification; Synthetic Iron Oxide

Multi Analyte Custom Grade Solution

Dental Amalgam Rule Update

Talon Compounding Pharmacy 10/3/17

Donald W. Guthner Orgenix, LLC Ill Hill Road. Douglassville, PA (888) ORGENIX ( ) (484) (FAX) Intramedullary Nails, Nails

Transcription:

Establishing Rules for: Medical Device Reports (803) & Correction and Removal Reports (806) Presented by: Cap Uldriks, FDA Daniel P. Olivier, CCS Page 1

Objectives Define regulatory reporting rules based on on established standards Simplify regulatory reporting decision making Establish defensible basis to to support compliance with with reporting regulations Reduce risk risk of of non-compliance observations Page 2

AGENDA Reporting Regulations Evaluating Safety Risks Defining the Strategy Summary Page 3

Reporting + Regulations Page 4

21 21 CFR Part 803: Medical Device Reporting MDR reportable event means: (1) User facilities become aware of information that reasonably suggests a device has or may have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury; or (2) Manufacturers or importers become aware of information that reasonably suggests one of their marketed devices: (i) May have caused or contributed to a death or serious injury, or (ii) Has malfunctioned and that the device or a similar device marketed by the manufacturer or importer would be likely to cause or contribute to a death or serious injury if the malfunction were to recur. Page 5

Compliance Program Guidance for 21 21 CFR Part 803: Medical Device Reporting If the event is likely to cause or contribute to death or serious injury" then the event is reportable The preamble offers the following guidance, i.e., a malfunction report is required when: 1.The chance of a death or serious injury occurring as a result of the recurrence of the malfunction is not remote 2.The consequences of the malfunction affect the device in a catastrophic manner that may lead to a death or serious injury (Class I Recall) Page 6

21 21 CFR Part 806: Corrections and Removal Reporting Sec. 806.10 Reports of corrections and removals. (a) Each device manufacturer or importer shall submit a written report to FDA of any correction or removal of a device initiated by them: (1) To reduce a risk to health posed by the device; or (2) To remedy a violation of the act caused by the device which may present a risk to health unless the information has already been provided under Part 803 or Part 1004 or the action is exempt from the reporting under 806.1(b). Page 7

Compliance Program Guidance for 21 21 CFR Part 806: FDA Corrections and Removals Reporting Risk to Health - The key concept to determine whether an event is reportable under Part 806: Use of, or exposure to, the product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences, or an outcome where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote (Class II Recall). Page 8

21 21 CFR Part 7.3: Recall Class Definitions Class I is a situation in which there is reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, a violative product will cause serious adverse health consequences or death (criteria for 803 reporting) Class II is a situation in which there is reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote (criteria for 806 reporting) Class III is a situation in which there is reasonable probability that the use of, or exposure to, a violative product is not likely to cause serious adverse health consequences Page 9

Evaluating + Safety Risk Page 10

Risk Evaluation, Severity Severity* - Assess the worst possible consequence, defined by degree of injury or illness that could occur. Severity classification identified as follows: Major, may cause death or serious injury Moderate, may cause non-serious injury Minor, not expected to cause injury *Based on Levels of Concern defined in Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices, Food and Drug Administration, May 11,2005. Page 11

MIL-STD 882D* Severity Levels Severity: Suggested mishap categories: Catastrophic, could result in death, permanent total disability, loss exceeding $1M Critical, could result in permanent partial disability, or that may result in hospitalization of at least three people, $200k-$1M loss Marginal, could result in injury resulting in more than one lost work day, $10K-$200K loss Negligible, could result in injury resulting in less than one lost day, less than $10K * Standard Practice for System Safety, MIL-STD-882D, Department of Defense, February 10, 2000, Appendix A, Table A-1, page 18 Page 12

ISO 14971:2000* Severity Levels Severity: levels may be descriptive, e.g. Catastrophic Serious Critical Marginal Negligible * Medical device - Application of safety risk management to medical devices, ANSI/AAMI/ISO 14971:2000 section E.2.2, page 32 Page 13

Consolidated Severity Levels MIL-STD 882D ISO 14971:2000 FDA Guidance Catastrophic Catastrophic Major Serious Major Critical Critical Major Marginal Marginal Moderate Negligible Negligible Minor Page 14

MIL-STD-882D* Risk Evaluation, Probability Probability* - Probability that a mishap will occur during the planned life expectancy of the system: Frequent - Likely to occur often (X > 10-1 ) Probable - Will occur several times in the life of the system. (10-1 >X >10-2 ) Occasional - Likely to occur sometime in the life of the system. (10-2 >X >10-3 ) Remote - Unlikely but possible to occur in the life of the system. (10-3 >X >10-6 ) Improbable - So unlikely, it can be assumed occurrence may not be experienced (X < 10-6 ) * Standard Practice for System Safety, MIL-STD-882D, Department of Defense, February 10, 2000, Appendix A, Table A-2, page 19 Page 15

ISO 14971:2000* Risk Evaluation, Probability Probability - Probability estimation examines the initiating events or circumstances and the sequences of events that are of concern: Frequent Probable Occasional Remote Improbable Incredible * Medical device - Application of safety risk management to medical devices, ANSI/AAMI/ISO 14971:2000 section E.2.1, page 31 Page 16

Proposed Risk Assessment Matrix for FDA Adverse Event Reporting Frequent Probable Occasional Remote Improbable Minor Moderate Major Note: Probability level of Incredible from ISO 14971:2003 not included Page 17

Defining the Strategy Page 18

Compliance Program Guidance for 21 21 CFR Part 803: Medical Device Reporting If the event is likely to cause or contribute to death or serious injury" then the event is reportable The preamble offers the following guidance, i.e., a malfunction report is required when: 1.The chance of a death or serious injury occurring as a result of the recurrence of the malfunction is not remote; 2.The consequences of the malfunction affect the device in a catastrophic manner that may lead to a death or serious injury Page 19

Proposed Risk Assessment Matrix for FDA Adverse Event Reporting Frequent Probable Occasional Remote Improbable Minor Moderate Major MDR MDR MDR Note: Probability level of Incredible from ISO 14971:2003 not included Page 20

Compliance Program Guidance for 21 21 CFR Part 806: FDA Corrections and Removals Reporting Reports are NOT required IF: The information has already been reported to FDA under the MDR regulation, 21 CFR Part 803 or under 21 CFR 1004 (Replacement of Electronic Products). The key concept for determining when an event is reportable is the CAR regulation's definition of risk to health: Use of, or exposure to, the product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences, or an outcome where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote (Class II Recall). Page 21

Proposed Risk Assessment Matrix for FDA Adverse Event Reporting Frequent Minor Moderate NR CAR Major MDR Probable NR CAR MDR Occasional NR CAR MDR Remote NR NR CAR Improbable NR NR NR NR - Not reportable CAR - Reportable under 21 CFR Part 806 MDR - reportable under 21 CFR Part 803 Page 22

Summary Page 23

Defining Reporting Strategy Reference to external standards/guidelines provides defensibility for decision making Established rules provide: consistency use of common terminology facilitate training Established rules reduce compliance risk Page 24

References Medical device - Application of safety risk management to medical devices, ANSI/AAMI/ISO 14971:2000. Guidance for the Content of Premarket Submissions for Software Contained in Medical Devices, FDA, Office of Device Evaluation, May 11, 2005. Standard Practice for System Safety, MIL-STD-882D, Department of Defense, February 10, 2000. 21 CFR Part 7 Enforcement Policy, US Federal Register, Food and Drug Administration. Page 25