Hon-Kan Yip, MD; Chiung-Jen Wu, MD; Morgan Fu, MD; Kuo-Ho Yeh, MD; Teng-Hung Yu, MD; Wei-Chin Hung, MD; and Mien-Cheng Chen, MD

Similar documents
Hon-Kan Yip, MD; Chiung-Jen Wu, MD; Mien-Cheng Chen, MD; Hsueh-Wen Chang, PhD; Kelvin Yuan-Kai Hsieh, MD; Chi-Ling Hang, MD; and Morgan Fu, MD

LM stenting - Cypher

Recurrent Thrombosis in a Case of Coronary Ectasia with Large Thrombus Burden Successfully Treated by Adjunctive Warfarin Therapy

When Aspiration Thrombectomy Does Not Work? A A R O N W O N G N A T I O N A L H E A R T C E N T R E S I N G A P O R E

International Journal of Cardiology and Cardiovascular Research Vol. 1(1), pp , June,

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Influence of Treatment Delay on Infarct Size and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Angioplasty

OUTCOME OF THROMBOLYTIC AND NON- THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Percutaneous Intervention of Unprotected Left Main Disease

Abstract Background: Methods: Results: Conclusions:

PCI for Left Anterior Descending Artery Ostial Stenosis

Case Report Rheolytic Thrombectomy Combined with a Protective Filter and Platelet Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Receptor Inhibitors in Rescue Angioplasty

Prevention of Coronary Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Effect of Intravascular Ultrasound- Guided vs. Angiography-Guided Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: the IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial

Supplementary Table S1: Proportion of missing values presents in the original dataset

Acute Myocardial Infarction. Willis E. Godin D.O., FACC

Stent Trials in Acute Myocardial Infarction

What is the Optimal Triple Anti-platelet Therapy Duration in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Drug-eluting Stents Implantation?

AngioJet Rheolytic Thrombectomy During Rescue PCI for Failed Thrombolysis: A Single-Center Experience

Thrombus Aspiration before PCI: Routine Mandatory. Professor Clinical Cardiology Academic Medical Center University of Amsterdam

Case Report Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in an Acute Myocardial Infarction Due to the Occlusion of the Left Main Coronary Artery

PRIMARY CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY VERSUS INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION - A COMPARATIVE STUDY AT QUEEN ALIA HEART INSTITUTE

Concurrent Subarachnoid Hemorrhage and Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Case Report

Coronary Spasm as a Cause of Coronary Thrombosis and Myocardial Infarction

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Importance of the third arterial graft in multiple arterial grafting strategies

Sustained Benefit 20 Years After Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction

Predictors of 6-Month Angiographic Restenosis inside Bare-Metal Stent in Chinese Patients with Coronary Artery Disease

A Report From the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2)

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

Revascularization after Drug-Eluting Stent Implantation or Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery for Multivessel Coronary Disease

Periprocedural Myocardial Infarction and Clinical Outcome In Bifurcation Lesion

FFR-guided Jailed Side Branch Intervention

The First 12 Hours. ST-Segment Elevation AMI: Introduction. Definitions

Primary PCI versus thrombolytic therapy: long-term follow-up according to infarct location

Randomized Comparison of Prasugrel and Bivalirudin versus Clopidogrel and Heparin in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

CASE REPORTS: Filters to Prevent Distal Embolization during Coronary Artery Stenting: The Risk of Mousetrap

12 Lead ECGs: Ischemia, Injury & Infarction. Kevin Handke NRP, FP-C, CCP, CMTE STEMI Coordinator Flight Paramedic

Assessment of plaque morphology by OCT in patients with ACS

Cover Page. The handle holds various files of this Leiden University dissertation

Modeling and Risk Prediction in the Current Era of Interventional Cardiology

388-1 Poongnap-dong, Songpa-gu, Seoul, , Republic of Korea b Department of Medicine, Changi General Hospital, Singapore

Impact of Thromboaspiration during Primary PCI on infarcted segmental myocardial function: a Tissue Doppler imaging evaluation. EXPIRA Trial substudy.

Li Xu 1, MD, Hao Sun 1, MD, Le-Feng Wang 1, MD, Xin-Chun Yang 1, MD, Kui-Bao Li 1, MD, Da-Peng Zhang 1, MD, Hong-Shi Wang 1, MD, Wei-Ming Li 1, MD

INTRODUCTION. Key Words:

No-reflow is defined as a failure to restore antegrade normal coronary flow despite appropriate treatment of coronary obstruction. The prevalence of t

Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Without On-site Cardiac Surgery

Percutanous revascularization of chronic total occlusion of diabetic patients at Iraqi center for heart diseases, a single center experience 2012

B etween 30% and 50% of patients with acute myocardial

A. W. J. van t Hof, A. Liem, H. Suryapranata, J. C. A. Hoorntje, M.-J de Boer and F. Zijlstra

Treatment of Saphenous Vein Bypass Grafts With Ultrasound Thrombolysis. A Randomized Study (ATLAS)

Side Branch Occlusion

Target vessel only revascularization versus complet revascularization in non culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI

Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Is it beneficial to patients?

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 35, No. 4, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /00/$20.

APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 39, No. 11, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /02/$22.

Ischemic Postconditioning During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Mechanisms and Clinical Application Jian Liu, MD FACC FESC FSCAI Chief Phy

Preprocedural TIMI Flow and Mortality in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated by Primary Angioplasty

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 36, No. 5, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /00/$20.

Downloaded from ismj.bpums.ac.ir at 22: on Thursday March 7th 2019

UPDATE ON THE MANAGEMENTACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. DR JULES KABAHIZI, Psc (Rwa) Lt Col CHIEF CONSULTANT RMH/KFH 28 JUNE18

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Versus Balloon Angioplasty for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease

OBJECTIVES BACKGROUND METHODS RESULTS CONCLUSIONS by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /00/$20.00

Prognostic Significance of Epicardial Blood Flow Before and After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndromes

DEB experience in Gachon Universtiy Gil Hospital (in ISR) Soon Yong Suh MD., PhD. Heart Center Gachon University Gil Hospital Seoul, Korea.

Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI Management A pharmacoinvasive approach

Coronary Artery Embolism From Ruptured Plaque in the Left Main Trunks With Difficulty in Detection of Culprit Lesion: A Case Report

Lessons learned From The National PCI Registry

Solving the Dilemma of Ostial Stenting: A Case Series Illustrating the Flash Ostial System

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 37, No. 6, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /01/$20.

Cafri C; Zahger D; Rosenshtein G, Kleshian I; Ilia R

Intraaortic Balloon Counterpulsation- Supportive Data for a Role in Cardiogenic Shock ( Be Still My Friend )

Keywords: reperfusion coronary bypass surgery primary angioplasty. Article: INTRODUCITON

CORONARY CHRONIC TOTAL OCCLUSIONS IN THE SETTING OF ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Areca Nut Chewing Complicated with Non-Obstructive and Obstructive ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

EBC London 2013 Provisional SB stenting strategy with kissing balloon with Absorb

Safety and Efficacy of Coronary Stent Implantation. Acute and Six Month Outcomes of 1,126 Consecutive Patients Treated in 1996 and 1997

CPT Code Details

Severe Coronary Vasospasm Complicated with Ventricular Tachycardia

Bifurcation stenting with BVS

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Rescue PCI Versus a Conservative Approach for Failed Fibrinolysis in Patients with STEMI

1. Diabetes mellitus (DM) is associated with worse clinical and angiographic outcomes even in acute myocardial Infarction (AMI) patients.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 42, No. 10, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /03/$30.

Summary and conclusions. Summary and conclusions

Safety and Efficacy of Angioplasty with Intracoronary Stenting in Patients with Unstable Coronary Syndromes. Comparison with Stable Coronary Syndromes

A patient with non-q wave acute inferior myocardial infarction. Citation Hong Kong Practitioner, 1997, v. 19 n. 4, p

The development of cardiogenic shock portends an extremely poor prognosis. Cardiogenic Shock: A Lethal Complication of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Acute coronary syndromes

NCVD-PCI Registry. Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) Registry, MALAYSIA c/o National Heart Association of Malaysia

Results of the Washington Radiation for In-Stent Restenosis Trial for Long Lesions (Long WRIST) Studies

2017 Cardiology Survival Guide

Rafał Wolny, Jerzy Pręgowski, Paweł Bekta, Zbigniew Chmielak, Adam Witkowski

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 46, No. 5, by the American College of Cardiology Foundation ISSN /05/$30.

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 35, No. 5, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /00/$20.

What is new in the Treatment of STEMI? Malcolm R. Bell, MBBS Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

Transcription:

Clinical Features and Outcome of Patients With Direct Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Myocardial Infarction Resulting From Left Circumflex Artery Occlusion* Hon-Kan Yip, MD; Chiung-Jen Wu, MD; Morgan Fu, MD; Kuo-Ho Yeh, MD; Teng-Hung Yu, MD; Wei-Chin Hung, MD; and Mien-Cheng Chen, MD Background: Little is known about the clinical features and outcome of patients with left circumflex artery (LCX) infarct-related acute myocardial infarction (AMI). This study was conducted to investigate the clinical features and outcome of patients who underwent direct percutaneous coronary intervention (d-pci) for AMI caused by LCX occlusion, and to discover prognostic determinants in this clinical setting. Methods and results: Between May 1993 and October 2000, a total of 819 patients with AMI underwent d-pci in our hospital. Sixty-seven patients (8.2%) who had LCX infarct-related AMI constituted the population of this study. Ten of 67 patients (14.9%) were in cardiogenic shock. Angiographic findings demonstrated that the incidences of triple-vessel disease, reference lumen diameter (RLD) of the LCX > 4.0 mm, and LCX as the dominant artery in these patients were 26.9%, 22.4%, and 34.3%, respectively. Sixteen patients (23.9%) had unsuccessful reperfusion (defined as Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction flow < 2). Univariate analysis showed that dominant LCX, RLD of the LCX > 4.0 mm, cardiogenic shock, precordial ST-segment depression, and complete atrioventricular block were significantly related to unsuccessful reperfusion. Multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis demonstrated that dominant LCX and cardiogenic shock were significant independent predictors of unsuccessful reperfusion. The 30-day mortality rate in the 67 patients was 14.9%. Univariate analysis demonstrated that triple-vessel disease, dominant LCX, cardiogenic shock, poor left ventricular ejection fraction, and unsuccessful reperfusion were significantly associated with 30-day mortality. By multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis, dominant LCX, cardiogenic shock, and triple-vessel disease were significant independent predictors of increased 30-day mortality. Conclusions: LCX infarct-related AMI has its unique clinical features. The presence of dominant LCX and cardiogenic shock were independent determinants of unsuccessful reperfusion, and the presence of dominant LCX, cardiogenic shock, and triple-vessel disease were independent determinants of increased 30-day mortality in this clinical setting. (CHEST 2002; 122:2068 2074) Key words: acute myocardial infarction; left circumflex occlusion; percutaneous coronary intervention Abbreviations: AMI acute myocardial infarction; CPK creatine phosphokinase; d-pci direct percutaneous coronary intervention; LAD left anterior descending artery; LCX left circumflex artery; MI myocardial infarction; RCA right coronary artery; PDA posterior descending artery; PLA posterolateral artery; RLD reference lumen diameter; TIMI Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction The incidence of left circumflex artery (LCX) infarct-related acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is lower than either right coronary artery (RCA) or left anterior descending artery (LAD) *From the Division of Cardiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, ROC. Manuscript received November 26, 2001; revision accepted May 7, 2002. Correspondence to: Mien-Cheng Chen, MD, Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Kaohsiung, 123, Ta Pei Road, Niao Sung Hsiang, Kaohsiung Hsien, 83301, Taiwan, ROC; e-mail: chenmien@ kinghenry.com.tw. infarct-related AMI. It usually accounts for 13.6 to 20.8% of AMIs. 1 3 Inferior wall myocardial infarction (MI) caused by occlusion of the RCA accounts for 40 to 50% of AMIs, 1 6 and is generally believed to have a more favorable outcome than anterior wall MI. 4 7 However, little is known about the clinical features and outcome of patients with LCX infarctrelated AMI, either due to the relative lower incidence of occurrence, or because it is subjectively viewed as having the most favorable clinical outcome. In addition, the anatomic features of the LCX and the prognostic determinants in this clinical 2068 Clinical Investigations

setting have not been discussed. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the clinical features and outcome of patients who underwent direct percutaneous coronary intervention (d-pci) for LCX infarct-related AMI, and to discover prognostic determinants in this clinical setting. Patient Population Materials and Methods In our hospital, all patients with AMI underwent d-pci after informed consent was obtained. For the purpose of study, all patients undergoing d-pci were prospectively identified and entered into a computerized database. Between May 1993 and October 2000, d-pci was performed in 838 patients of all ages who presented with AMI of 12-h duration (or cardiogenic shock within 18 h) in our hospital. Sixty-seven of 819 patients (8.2%) [excluding 19 patients with acute left main coronary artery occlusion] who had LCX infarct-related AMI constituted the population of this study. Procedure and Protocol The procedure and protocol have been described previously in detail. 8,9 Before stents were available in our country, primary balloon angioplasty was performed in these patients; however, after stents were available in our country, primary stenting was considered first for these patients and the stent type was selected at the discretion of the operators. Patients were treated with ticlopidine for 2 weeks if stenting was performed. Aspirin, 100 mg po qd, was administered to each patient indefinitely. There was no in-stent subacute thrombosis in this study population. Definitions Standard 12-lead ECGs were performed in all patients. AMI was defined as the following: (1) typical chest pain lasting for 30 min with ST-segment elevation 1 mm in two consecutive precordial or inferior leads; (2) typical chest pain lasting for 30 min with a new onset of complete left bundle branch block; or (3) typical chest pain lasting for 30 min with ST-segment depression 1 mm or definite T-wave inversion or both and an elevation of creatine phosphokinase (CPK) with creatine kinase-mb fraction 4% on at least one occasion. Precordial ST-segment depression was defined as 1 mm ST-segment depression in two consecutive precordial leads and measured 80 ms after the J point with reference to the PR segment. Posterior wall MI was defined as R/S ratio of 1 in lead V 1 or V 2. The LCX was considered dominant when both the posterior descending artery (PDA) and posterolateral artery (PLA) arose from the LCX and the RCA was very small size and did not supply any part of the left ventricle. The LCX was considered co-dominant when either the PDA or PLA arose from the LCX. The LCX was considered nondominant LCX when neither the PDA nor PLA arose from the LCX. Reperfusion time was defined as the time from symptom onset of chest pain to first balloon inflation. Procedural success was defined as a reduction to residual stenosis of 50% by balloon angioplasty or successful stent deployment at the desired position with a residual stenosis 30% followed by Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) 10 grade 3 flow in the LCX. Unsuccessful reperfusion was defined as TIMI grade 2 flow in the distal LCX in the absence of an occlusion at the treatment site or evidence of distal embolization. Data Collection Detailed in-hospital and follow-up data which included age, sex, coronary risk factors, Killip score on admission, reperfusion time, pre- and post-timi flow grades, angiographic results, number of diseased vessels (diseased vessel was defined as 50% of stenosis), and in-hospital adverse events were obtained. These data were collected prospectively and entered into a computerized database. Statistical Analysis Data were expressed by mean SD. Continuous variables were compared using Student t test or Wilcoxon rank test. Categorical variables were compared using 2 or the Fisher exact test. Stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to determine independent predictors of unsuccessful reperfusion and 30-day mortality. All statistical analyses were performed by using software (SAS for Windows, version 6.12; SAS Institute; Cary, NC). A p value 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results Comparison of Baseline Characteristics, Clinical Features, Angiographic Results, and 30-Day Mortality Relevant patient characteristics, angiographic results, and 30-day mortality among 819 patients with AMI resulting from different coronary artery occlusions are summarized in Table 1. Angiographic findings demonstrated that there was no significant difference in the number of diseased vessels between patients with LCX infarct-related AMIs and patients with LAD infarct-related AMIs (p 0.69). However, patients with LCX infarct-related AMIs had a significantly higher incidence of single-vessel disease and lower incidence of multivessel disease than patients with RCA infarct-related AMIs (p 0.008). Furthermore, angiographic results demonstrated that there was no significant difference in unsuccessful or successful reperfusion between patients with LCX infarct-related AMIs and patients with RCA infarct-related AMIs (p 0.23). However, patients with LCX infarct-related AMIs had a significantly lower incidence of successful reperfusion and higher incidence of unsuccessful reperfusion than patients with LAD infarct-related AMIs (p 0.011). There was no significant difference in 30-day overall mortality among patients of the three groups. After excluding 15 patients who had either infarct-related mechanical complications, or left main disease and multivessel disease and required either urgent or emergency surgical intervention after d-pci, there was also no significant difference in 30-day mortality among patients of the three groups. www.chestjournal.org CHEST / 122 / 6/ DECEMBER, 2002 2069

Table 1 Comparison of Baseline Characteristics, Clinical Features, Angiographic Results, and 30-Day Mortality of 819 Patients With Different Infarct-Related Arteries* Variables LCX (n 67) RCA (n 291) LAD (n 461) p Value Age, yr 61 12 61.8 11.7 63.3 11.6 0.48 Female gender 6 (9.0) 46 (15.8) 66 (14.3) 0.35 Hypertension 27 (40.3) 142 (48.8) 227 (49.2) 0.39 Diabetes mellitus 16 (23.9) 70 (24.1) 121 (26.3) 0.78 Current smoker 40 (59.7) 152 (52.2) 271 (58.8) 0.18 Hypercholesterolemia 33 (49.3) 120 (41.2) 188 (40.8) 0.09 Previous MI 9 (13.4) 40 (13.7) 57 (12.7) 0.85 Previous CABG 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) 0 (0.0) Killip classification 0.21 I and II 50 (74.6) 220 (75.6) 364 (79.0) III 7 (10.4) 26 (8.9) 51 (11.1) IV 10 (14.9) 45 (15.5) 46 (10.0) Distribution of vessel disease Single-vessel disease 34 (50.7) 97 (33.3) 222 (48.2) Multivessel disease 34 (49.3) 194 (66.7) 239 (51.8) Pre-revascularization TIMI flow 0.74 1 57 (85.1) 249 (85.6) 385 (83.5) 2 10 (14.9) 42 (14.4) 76 (16.5) Mean reperfusion 289 149 286 175 278 154 0.86 Reperfusion status Successful reperfusion 51 (76.1) 240 (82.5) 404 (87.6) Unsuccessful reperfusion 16 (23.9) 51 (17.5) 57 (12.4) TIMI flow of 2 7 (10.4) 35 (12.0) 42 (9.1) TIMI flow 1 9 (13.4) 16 (5.5) 15 (3.3) Overall 30-d death 10 (14.9) 26 (8.9) 37 (8.3) 0.18 Death after excluded surgery 9/66 (13.6) 26/285 (9.1) 34/453 (7.5) 0.232 *Data are expressed as mean SD or No. (%) of patients. CABG coronary artery bypass surgery. p 0.008, LCX vs RCA. p 0.018, LCX vs LAD. ECG Manifestations and Coronary Angiographic Features of AMI Caused by LCX Occlusion ECG manifestations of acute LCX occlusion were widely variable, and inferior wall MI was the most frequent presentation (Table 2). More than one third of the patients had dominant LCX, and 22.4% of the patients had a reference lumen diameter (RLD) of the LCX 4.0 mm. The incidence of triple-vessel Table 2 ECG and Angiographic Features of 67 Patients Features Percent Infarction location by ECG Inferior 34.3 Inferior-posterior 34.3 Posterior 6.0 Lateral 7.4 Inferior-lateral 9.0 Non-Q wave 9.0 Angiographic feature of LCX Dominant LCX 34.3 Codominant LCX 29.9 Nondominant LCX 35.8 RLD of LCX 4.0 (mm) 22.4 disease was significantly higher in patients with than in patients without cardiogenic shock (80.0% [8 of 10 patients] vs 17.5% [10 of 57 patients], p 0.0007). Furthermore, the combined incidence of dominant LCX and RLD of the LCX 4.0 mm was significantly higher in patients with than in patients without cardiogenic shock (70.0% [7 of 10 patients] vs 3.5% [2 of 57 patients], p 0.0001). Angiographic findings demonstrated that these dominant LCXs were always associated with a very small RCA (Fig 1). The incidence of RLD 4.0 mm in patients with dominant LCX was significantly higher than that in patients without dominant LCX (39.1% vs 13.6%, p 0.029). Mean peak CPK level was significantly higher in patients with than in patients without dominant LCX and the RLD of LCX 4.0 mm (7,162 4,641 IU/L vs 3,339 2,294 IU/L, p 0.01). The Determinants of Unsuccessful Reperfusion in Patients With AMI Caused by LCX Occlusion Univariate analysis of the clinical and angiographic features between patients with successful (n 51) and unsuccessful (n 16) reperfusion demonstrated that there was no significant difference between the 2070 Clinical Investigations

Figure 1. Case 1. Top left, A: Right anterior oblique view demonstrated a small nondominant RCA. Top center, B: Anteroposterior caudal view demonstrated a plaque rapture with much intracoronary thrombus formation (black arrowheads) in proximal dominant LCX with its diameter 4.0 mm, and total occlusion of distal LCX was observed (black arrows). Top right, C: Angiogram after balloon angioplasty demonstrated successful dilatation of proximal LCX (arrowheads), no-reflow phenomenon of distal LCX (smaller arrows), and distal embolization of obtuse marginal branch (larger arrows). Case 2. Bottom left, D: Right anterior oblique view demonstrated a small nondominant RCA. Bottom center, E: Anteroposterior caudal view demonstrated total occlusion of proximal LCX (arrowhead). Bottom right, F: Angiogram after balloon angioplasty demonstrated successful dilatation of the proximal occlusion (arrowhead), atherosclerosis of distal LCX (larger arrows) and no-reflow phenomenon in the PDA (small arrows). two groups in terms of baseline characteristics (age, sex, current smoking, the presence of hypertension, diabetes mellitus, posterior wall MI), triple-vessel disease, type of reperfusion method, and time to reperfusion. However, patients with unsuccessful reperfusion had a significantly higher incidence of precordial ST-segment depression (81.3% vs 45.1%, p 0.017), complete atrioventricular block (31.3% vs 3.9%, p 0.008), cardiogenic shock (43.8% vs 5.9%, p 0.002), dominant LCX (75.0% vs 21.6%, p 0.001) and RLD of the LCX 4 mm (50.0% vs 13.7%, p 0.004), and poorer left ventricular function (46.3 9.6% vs 57.3 13.9%, p 0.003) than patients with successful reperfusion. There was no significant difference in successful reperfusion between balloon angioplasty and stenting in either the overall patients (78.7% [37 of 47 patients] vs 70.0% [14 of 20 patients], p 0.45) or in patients with dominant LCX (50.0% [8 of 16 patients] vs 42.9% [3 of 7 patients], p 0.99). By multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis (Table 3), only dominant LCX and cardiogenic shock were independent determinants of unsuccessful reperfusion. Therefore, the significance of precordial ST-segment depression, complete atrioventricular block, and poorer left ventricular function could be attributed to the presence of dominant LCX and cardiogenic shock. Table 3 Multiple Stepwise Logistic Regression Analysis of Significant Variables Associated With Unsuccessful Reperfusion* Variables TIMI-2 flow (n 16) TIMI-3 flow (n 51) Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval p Value Dominant LCX (n 23) 12 (75.0) 11 (21.6) 3.94 1.73 8.97 0.0011 Cardiogenic shock (n 10) 7 (43.8) 3 (5.9) 2.71 1.41 5.21 0.0029 *Data are presented as No. (%) unless otherwise indicated. www.chestjournal.org CHEST / 122 / 6/ DECEMBER, 2002 2071

Clinical Characteristics and Angiographic Features Related to 30-Day Mortality in Patients With AMI Caused by LCX Occlusion Univariate analysis of the clinical and angiographic features between patients who survived the first 30 days (n 57) and patients who died within the first 30 days (n 10) demonstrated that there was no difference between the two groups in terms of baseline characteristics, precordial ST-segment depression, complete atrioventricular block, and RLD of the LCX 4 mm. However, patients who died within the first 30 days had a significantly higher incidence of triple-vessel disease (77.8% vs 17.5%, p 0.002), unsuccessful reperfusion (66.6% vs 17.5%, p 0.005), dominant LCX (77.8% vs 28.1%, p 0.01), cardiogenic shock (66.7% vs 5.3%, p 0.002), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (41.3 9.2% vs 57.5 13.0%, p 0.004) than those who survived the first 30 days after d-pci. By multiple stepwise logistic regression analysis (Table 4), only dominant LCX, cardiogenic shock, and triple-vessel disease were independent determinants of increased 30-day mortality. The overall 30-day mortality of patients with cardiogenic shock was 70% (including one patient with cardiogenic shock who died after surgical intervention). Discussion The Association of Dominant LCX and Cardiogenic Shock With Unsuccessful Reperfusion In the present study, we found that the incidence of LCX with RLD 4.0 mm was 22.4%, and angiographic observations demonstrated that all of these vessels contained high-burden thrombus formation (Fig 1). In this study, we also found that patients with unsuccessful reperfusion had a significantly higher incidence of RLD of the LCX 4.0 mm than patients with successful reperfusion. Recently, we reported that an infarct-related artery with an RLD 4.0 mm was more frequently observed to have high-burden thrombus formation and to have a significantly higher incidence of no-reflow phenomenon after d-pci in patients with cardiogenic shock. 9 It is, thus, not surprising to observe that the LCX with an RLD 4.0 mm was significantly related to a higher incidence of unsuccessful reperfusion in the present study. In the present study, one of our important findings was that a dominant LCX was most significantly related to an increased incidence of unsuccessful reperfusion. However, only 39.1% (9 of 23 patients) of dominant LCXs had a diameter 4.0 mm. Furthermore, it was found that not only dominant LCX and cardiogenic shock but the vessel diameter of LCX 4.0 mm were the independent predictors of unsuccessful reperfusion. These results suggest that other mechanisms rather than an RLD of LCX 4.0 mm play pivotal roles in unsuccessful reperfusion. In practice, we found that the PDA was the vessel that most often developed no-reflow phenomenon after d-pci for acute LCX occlusion (Fig 1). This raises the possibility that the unique anatomic course of the LCX and its final branch, the PDA, might play a peculiar role in unsuccessful reperfusion. Anatomically, a dominant LCX courses along the lateral part of the heart after it arises from the left main coronary artery and gives off its major branches to supply the lateral (obtuse marginal branches), posterior and inferior (PLA and PDA) walls of the left ventricle. The dominant LCX has several acute angles in its course, at its origin (a reverse L curve) and at its distal part to become the PDA (an L curve). These acute angles lead to turbulence and shear stress. Turbulence has been shown to enhance thrombus formation in experimental models, and shear stress has also been shown to induce changes in platelet activity. 11 14 In addition, after acute LCX occlusion, milking action resulting from heart contraction is greatly reduced or even disappears and this leads to stasis and subsequent thrombus formation. These factors might explain why dominant LCX was an independent predictor of unsuccessful reperfusion. Practically, it would be too difficult to prove why cardiogenic shock was an independent predictor of unsuccessful reperfusion in the present study. However, the following two explanations could be taken into consideration. First, cardiogenic shock in our Table 4 Multiple Stepwise Logistic Regression Analysis of Significant Variables Associated With Increased 30-Day Mortality* Variables Mortality (n 9) Survivors (n 57) Odds Ratio 95% Confidence Interval p Value Dominant LCX (n 23) 7 (77.8) 16 (28.1) 0.14 0.03 0.69 0.0167 Cardiogenic shock (n 10) 6 (66.7) 3 (5.3) 0.24 0.09 0.65 0.0048 Triple-vessel disease (n 17) 7 (77.8) 10 (17.5) 0.24 0.08 0.69 0.0078 *Data are presented as No. (%). 2072 Clinical Investigations

patients was significantly associated with poorer left ventricular function, which leads to increased left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, subsequently retarding achievement of normal LCX blood flow. Second, the elevated left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and hypotensive state during cardiogenic shock provide slow flow and blood stasis, subsequently, no-reflow phenomenon. The Clinical Outcome and the Prognostic Determinants After Acute LCX Occlusion The mortality from acute inferior wall MI with thrombolytic therapy is 10% and it is believed to have a more favorable clinical outcome than anterior wall MI. 4,5,7 However, 70 to 80% of acute inferior wall MIs are caused by RCA occlusion. 1 3 The clinical features and outcome of patients with acute LCX occlusion have not been discussed in detail previously. One of the important findings in the present study was that there was no significant difference of 30-day overall mortality rate between the patients with LCX and LAD infarct-related AMIs. There are two reasonable explanations. First, failure of mechanical reperfusion therapy was associated untoward clinical outcome. 9 In the present study, we found that patients with acute LCX occlusion had significantly higher incidence of unsuccessful reperfusion than patients with acute LAD occlusion. This subsequently led to increased mortality rate in patients with acute LCX occlusion. Second, a previous study 15 demonstrated that left ventricular dysfunction could develop in AMI due to isolated LCX stenosis, and a postmortem study 16 showed that the LCX supplied half as much of the left ventricle as the LAD. Our finding suggested that patients with acute LCX occlusion did not always have a more favorable clinical outcome than patients with acute LAD occlusion. In this study, we demonstrated that cardiogenic shock, dominant LCX, and triple-vessel disease were significantly independent predictors of increased 30-day mortality in patients with LCX infarct-related AMI. Previous studies have found that AMI complicated by cardiogenic shock accounts for 7 to 11% of all MIs. 17,18 The mortality rate of patients with cardiogenic shock could be reduced from 80% using conservative treatment 17 to 40% using d- PCI. 9,17 19 Recently, we reported that the incidence of cardiogenic shock and 30-day mortality rate of patients with cardiogenic shock who underwent d- PCI for AMI were 12.8% and 32.1%, respectively. 9 In this study, the incidence of cardiogenic shock in patients with LCX infarct-related AMI was 14.9%. Surprisingly, we found that the 30-day mortality rate of patients with cardiogenic shock caused by acute LCX occlusion was 60%. We remain uncertain as to why the mortality rate of cardiogenic shock in this subgroup of patients was so high. This increased mortality could be attributed to two factors. First, in this study, the incidence of triple-vessel disease, which has been demonstrated as an independent predictor of increased mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock, 9 was significantly higher in patients with than without cardiogenic shock. Second, patients with cardiogenic shock had a significantly higher incidence of coexistence of dominant LCX and RLD of LCX 4.0 mm. In addition, angiographic findings demonstrated that the dominant LCX was always associated with a very small RCA, and the peak CPK level was significantly higher in patients with than in patients without these distinctive angiographic features. This indicated a larger infarction area associated with poorer left ventricular ejection fraction and cardiogenic shock in patients with these distinctive angiographic features, and consequently a higher 30-day mortality. Our study had several limitations. First, the number of patients in this study was small; therefore, our results should be viewed as preliminary and await confirmation by larger clinical trials. Second, our study was not specifically designed to evaluate longterm clinical outcomes; therefore, it could not provide long-term clinical outcome in this clinical setting. Third, platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade, which has been shown to substantially improve clinical outcomes in elective or primary percutaneous coronary intervention, 20 was not used in this study. Whether adjunctive therapy with platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade could improve the perfusion rate and clinical outcome of patients with LCX infarct-related AMI remains to be determined. Finally, the role of Thrombectomy with Angiojet Catheter 21 or PercuSurge Guard Wire Distal Balloon Protection System 22 to remove high-burden thrombus and to improve the clinical outcome of the patients with AMI in this clinical setting had not been evaluated in this study. In conclusion, LCX infarct-related AMI has its unique clinical features and does not always indicate a more favorable clinical outcome, especially in patients with cardiogenic shock. Our results demonstrated that the presence of dominant LCX and cardiogenic shock were independent determinants of unsuccessful reperfusion and the presence of dominant LCX, cardiogenic shock, and triple-vessel disease were independent determinants of increased 30-day mortality in this clinical setting. www.chestjournal.org CHEST / 122 / 6/ DECEMBER, 2002 2073

References 1 Atoniucci D, Valenti R, Santoro GM, et al. Systemic direct angioplasty and stent-supported direct angioplasty therapy for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: in-hospital and long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:294 300 2 Stone GW, Grines CL, Browne KF, et al. Predictors of in-hospital and 6 month outcome after acute myocardial infarction in the reperfusion era: the Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction (PAMI) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 1995; 25:370 377 3 Grines CL, Cox DA, Stone GW, et al. Coronary angioplasty with or without stent implantation for acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:1949 1956 4 Gruppo Italiano per lo Studio della Streptochinasi nell Infarto Miocardico (GISSI). Effectiveness of intravenous thrombolytic treatment in acute myocardial infarction. Lancet 1986; 1:397 402 5 ISIS-2 (Second International Study of Infarct Survival) Collaborative Group. Randomized trial of intravenous streptokinase, oral aspirin, both or neither among 17,187 cases of suspected acute myocardial infarction: ISIS-2. Lancet 1988; 2:349 360 6 Berger PB, Ryan TJ. Inferior myocardial infarction: high-risk subgroups. Circulation 1990; 81:401 411 7 Kennedy JW, Martin GV, Davis KB, et al. The Western Washington intravenous streptokinase in acute myocardial infarction randomized trial. Circulation 1988; 77:345 352 8 Yip HK, Chang HW, Wu CJ, et al. A safe and effective regimen without heparin therapy after successful primary coronary stenting in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Jpn Heart J 2000; 41:697 711 9 Yip HK, Wu CJ, Chang HW, et al. Comparison of impact of primary percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and primary stenting on short-term mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock and evaluation of prognostic determinants. Am J Cardiol 2001; 87:1184 1188 10 The TIMI Study Group. The Thrombolysis in Myocardial Infarction (TIMI) Trial: phase 1 findings. N Engl J Med 1985: 312:932 936 11 Smith RL, Blick EF, Coalson J, et al. Thrombus production by turbulence. J Appl Physiol 1972; 32:261 264 12 Stein PD, Sabbah HN. Measured turbulence and its effect on thrombus formation. Circulation Res 1974; 35:608 614 13 Stein PD, Sabbah HN. Turbulence blood flow in the ascending aorta of humans with normal and diseased aortic valves. Circulation Res 1976; 39:58 65 14 Yu SK, Latour JG, Marchandise B, et al. Shear stress-induced changes in platelet reactivity. Thromb Haemost 1978; 40: 551 560 15 Sheehan FH. Left ventricular dysfunction in acute myocardial infarction due to isolated left circumflex coronary artery stenosis. Am J Cardiol 1989; 64:440 447 16 Kalbleisch H, Hort W. Quantitative study on the size of coronary artery supplying areas postmortem. Am Heart J 1977; 94:183 188 17 Berger PB, Holmes DR, Stebbins AL, et al. Impact of an aggressive invasive cardiogenic shock in the global utilization of streptokinase and tissue plasminogen activator for occluded coronary arteries (GUSTO-I) trial: an observational study. Circulation 1997; 96:122 127 18 Hochman JS, Sleeper LA, Webb FG, et al. Early revascularization in acute myocardial infarction complicated by cardiogenic shock. N Engl J Med 1999; 341:625 634 19 Atoniucci D, Valenti R, Santoro GM, et al. Systemic direct angioplasty and stent-supported direct angioplasty therapy for cardiogenic shock complicating acute myocardial infarction: in-hospital and long-term survival. J Am Coll Cardiol 1998; 31:294 300 20 Brener SJ, Barr LA, Burchenal JEB, et al. Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade with primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction: on behalf of the ReoPro and Primary PTCA Organization and Randomized Trial (RAPPORT) Investigators. Circulation 1998; 98:734 741 21 Nakagawa Y, Matsuo S, Kimura T, et al. Thrombectomy with Angiojet catheter in native coronary arteries for patients with acute or recent myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol 1999; 83:994 999 22 Belli G, Pezzano A, De Biase AM, et al. Adjunctive thrombus aspiration and mechanical protection from distal embolization in primary percutaneous intervention for acute myocardial infarction. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2000; 50:362 370 2074 Clinical Investigations