Brånemark System Facts & Figures

Similar documents
Brånemark System Facts & Figures

Replace Facts & Figures

Implant osseointegration and successful restoration

During the last 30 years, endosseous oral

Fixed full-arch implant-supported acrylic resin prostheses

Evaluation of Patient and Implant Characteristics as Potential Prognostic Factors for Oral Implant Failures

The Self-tapping and ICE 3i Implants: A Prospective 3-Year Multicenter Evaluation

The Brånemark osseointegration method, using titanium dental implants (fixtures)

A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns

Implants- immediate restoration of postextraction edentation both esthetically and functionally

Since the early 1980s, when the concept of

Case study 2. A Retrospective Multi-Center Study on the Spiral Implant

Etiology, risk factors and management of implant fractures

Retrospective Cohort Study of the Clinical Performance of 1-Stage Dental Implants

Areview of recent studies concerning molar. Single Molar Replacement with a Progressive Thread Design Implant System: A Retrospective Clinical Report

Initially, Brånemark System (Nobel Biocare AB,

The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry

Mandibular implant-supported hybrid prostheses

Endosseous dental implants initially showed very

Analysis of Short-term Success Rate and Healing Patterns of Implantium Implant

The evaluation of long-term treatment results for

(Please note that Abstracts, reviews, case reports, technique descriptions, animal and in vitro tests are excluded)

John P. Zarb, BA, DDS George A. Zarb, BChD, DDS, MS, MS, FRCD(C)

Case study 40. Use of narrow implants for restoration of missing anterior teeth. Dr. Amir Gazmawe

G03: Complications 12/7/2013 8:00AM 4:30PM

The main objective in the treatment of edentulous

Many of the problems reported by conventional

A retrospective study on separate single-tooth implant restorations to replace two or more consecutive. maxillary posterior teeth up to 6 years.

JOMI on CD-ROM, 1990 Mar ( ): The Applicability of Osseointegrated Oral Imp

Zurich Open Repository and Archive. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns

BIOMECHANICS AND OVERDENTURES

The Importance of Implant Surface Characteristics in the Replacement of Failed Implants

A Long-term Retrospective Analysis of Survival Rates of Implants in the Mandible

The restoration of partially and completely

The biologic predictability of dental implants has

A Multicenter Report on 1,022 Consecutively Placed ITI Implants: A 7-Year Longitudinal Study

The effect of attachment type and implant number on satisfaction and quality of life of mandibular implant-retained overdenture wearers

Comparative Evaluation of Bone in Mandibular Implant Retained Overdentures Using Delayed and Immediate Loading Protocol: An In-Vivo Study

EFFECTIVE DATE: 04/24/14 REVISED DATE: 04/23/15, 04/28/16, 06/22/17, 06/28/18 POLICY NUMBER: CATEGORY: Dental

Complication incidence of two implant systems up to six years: a comparison between internal and external connection implants

There are many longitudinal investigations

While the protocol for direct bone-to-implant

Implant treatment in patients with severely

The use of two interforaminal implants to retain/

Bernt Andersson, DDS, Odont Dr/PhD;* Sibel Bergenblock, DDS; Björn Fürst, DDS; Torsten Jemt, DDS, Odont Dr/PhD

Mechanical and technical risks in implant therapy.

Over the last decades, the use

Influence of Patient Age on the Success Rate of Dental Implants Supporting an Overdenture in an Edentulous Mandible: A 3-year Prospective Study

Practice-Based Evidence from 29-Year Outcome Analysis of Management of the Edentulous Jaw Using Osseointegrated Dental Implants

Over the years, many different implant systems

Rehabilitation of a Patient with Completely Edentulous Maxillary Arch using All on 4 Concept of Implantation

CIC Edizioni Internazionali. Patient satisfaction with oral implant rehabilitation: evaluation of responses to a questionnaire

The Use of Alpha-Bio Tec's Narrow NeO Implants with Cone Connection for Restoration of Limited Width Ridges

Orthodontic aspects of the use of oral implants in adolescents: a 10-year follow-up study

Rehabilitation of an Edentulous Patient with Implant Supported Overdenture

Single-Tooth Implants and Their Role in Preserving Remaining Teeth: A 10-Year Survival Study

Mandibular Implant-Retained Overdentures with two Different Implant Designs. Ibrahim R. Eltorky

At present, there are several

Stress Distribution in Natural Tooth and Implant Supported Removable Partial Denture with Different Attachment Types: A Photoelastic Analysis

Medical interventions involving surgical procedures

Social changes, evolution in dentistry, and changes

The International Journal of Periodontics & Restorative Dentistry

Clinical UM Guideline

Occlusal Principles and Considerations for Implants: An Overview

Evaluation of peri-implant tissue response according to the presence of keratinized mucosa Abstract Purpose: Materials and methods Results:

Abutment Screw Loosening in Single-Implant Restorations: A Systematic Review

Following the introduction of osseointegration

Implant supported mandibular overdenture - a literature review of costs, maintenance and patient satisfaction

Evaluation of supported overdenture by implant and magnet

Lifelong Craniofacial Growth and the Implications for Osseointegrated Implants

The high clinical success rate of endosseous

Success Criteria in Implant Dentistry: A Systematic Review

REVIEWS. 10 Stomatologija, Baltic Dental and Maxillofacial Journal, 2008, Vol. 10, No. 1 SUMMARY

KNOWLEDGE AND ACCEPTANCE OF DENTAL IMPLANT TREATMENT IN GENERAL PUBLIC IN DELHI POPULATION

The success rate for osseointegration of

SECTION 5. Does the Type of Implant Prosthesis Affect Outcomes for the Completely Edentulous Arch?

UTILISATION OF COMPUTER BASED

A systematic review of survival of single implants as presented in longitudinal studies with a follow-up of at least 10 years

Immediate Loading of Single-Tooth Implants in the Posterior Region

Early implant failure. Prognostic capacity of Periotest s : retrospective study of a large sample

It is well-known that osseointegrated implants do not

Direct Implant Loading in the Edentulous Maxilla Using a Bone Density Adapted Surgical Protocol and Primary Implant Stability Criteria for Inclusion

The proven effectiveness of prosthetic treatment

Osseointegrated implant-supported

Single tooth replacement

9. Literaturübersicht

MULTIDIRECTIONAL APPROACH OF ORAL REHABILITATION WITH IMPLANTS IN A PATIENT WITH LIMITED MOUTH OPENING: A CASE REPORT

NobelActive Inventor s perspective on this new direction for implants

Prosthetic Options in Implant Dentistry. Hakimeh Siadat, DDS, MSc Associate Professor

The simplicity of the low-profile attachments

Retrospective Analysis of Dental Implants Placed and Restored by Advanced Prosthodontic Residents

The treatment of the completely edentulous mandible

A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region I: Clinical and radiographic results

Change in Paradigm: Dental Implant Loading

A study on the changes in attractive force of magnetic attachments for overdenture

in the topic of tooth-implant supported

THE EFFECT OF ABUTMENT HEIGHT ON SCREW LOOSENING IN SINGLE IMPLANT-SUPPORTED PROSTHESES AFTER DYNAMIC CYCLIC LOADING

surgical and prosthetic options & impression technique overview

Use of Implant Retained Overdenture in Atrophic Mandible - A Case Report

EMG activity of the masseter muscle in implant supported overdenture wearers during chewing of hard and soft food

Transcription:

Brånemark System Facts & Figures Brånemark System is synonymous with the revolution in dental care by the introduction of safe and effective implants. Professor Brånemark, its inventor, always put the patient in focus and secured the outcome by meticulous clinical evidence. The first patient was treated in 1965, and Brånemark System is today the most used and documented implant system on the market. More than 1000 articles, published in scientific journals, report on the use and the excellent outcome of Brånemark System implants. A dominating position In a published review 6 on prospective, long-term clinical studies, Brånemark System had a dominating position; more than 50% of the reviewed articles reported on studies performed with Brånemark System implants. Prospective long-term clinical studies The reference tables below shows an overview of some of the Brånemark System long-term studies with at least 5 years of follow-up. The references are divided according to indication areas; i.e., full-arch, partial and single-tooth replacements.

Table 1. Overview of cumulative survival/success rates () in full arch replacements. Full arch replacements Prosthesis F-up Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004 OD 15 y 96% 100% Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004 FB 20 y 87% 84% Bergendal T & Engquist B 1998 OD 5 y 100% 75% - - Eliasson A et al 2000 FB 5 y 99% - - - Ericsson I et al 2000 FB 5 y 100% - - - Ekelund JA et al 2003 FB 20 y 99% - 100% - Friberg B et al 1997 FB 5 y 100% 87% 97% Hemmings KW et al 1994 OD 5 y 93% - - - Jemt T 1994 FB 5 y - 92% - 96% Jemt T et al 2002 FB 5 y - 93% - 95% Naert I et al 1998 Naert I et al 2004 OD OD 5y 10 y 99% 99% - - - Watson RM et al 1997 OD 5 y 72% 100% 78% Åstrand P et al 2004 FB 5 y 95% - Örtorp A et al 2004 FB 5 y 99.5% 100%* 89% 97%* 100% 100%* 95% 96.5%* FB, fixed bridge; OD, overdenture; * The reference includes 2 study groups.

Table 2. Overview of cumulative survival/success rates () in partial replacements. Partial replacements Prosthesis F-up Attard N et al 2003 FPD 8 y 92% 89% Glauser R et al 2007 FPD 5y 97% - - Gunne J et al 1999 FPD 10 y 88% - 82.5% - Jemt T & Lekholm U 1993 FPD 5 y 97% 100% Jemt T et al 2003 (Group A) FPD 5 y 99% 100% 97.5% Lekholm U et al 1994 Lekholm U et al 1999 FPD FPD 5 y 10 y 92% 90% 86.5% Wyatt CCL & Zarb GA 1998 FPD 5 y 97% Zarb GA & Schmitt A 1993 FPD 5 y 92% 98% - - Zarb GA & Schmitt A 1993 FB/OD 5 y 89% 100% 100% FB, fixed bridge; OD, overdenture; FPD, fixed partial denture Table 3. Overview of cumulative survival/success rates () in single tooth replacements. Single tooth replacements F-up Andersson B et al 1998 5 y NR 98.5% NR 94 % Andersson B et al 1998 5 y - 100% - 97% Henry PJ et al 1996 5 y NR 97% - - Polizzi G et al 1999 5 y 93% - Scheller H et al 1998 5 y NR 98% NR 91 % NR, not reported in the table (< 20 implants)

References 1. Andersson B, Ödman P, Lindvall A-M, Brånemark P-I. Cemented single crowns on osseointegrated implants after 5 years: Results from a prospective study on CeraOne. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:212-8. 2. Andersson B, Ödman P, Lindvall A-M, Brånemark P-I. Five-year prospective study of prosthodontic and surgical single-tooth implant treatment in general practices and at a specialist clinic. Int J Prosthodont 1998;11:351-5. 3. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Implant prosthodontic management of partially edentulous patients missing posterior teeth: The Toronto experience. J Prosthet Dent 2003;89:352-9. 4. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant-fixed prostheses: The Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:417-24. 5. Attard NJ, Zarb GA. Long-term treatment outcomes in edentulous patients with implant overdentures: The Toronto study. Int J Prosthodont 2004;17:425-33. 6. Berglundh T, Persson L, Klinge B. A systematic review of the incidence of biological and technical complications in implant therapy reported in prospective longitudinal studies of 5 years. J Clin Periodontol 2002;29 (suppl 3):197-212. 7. Bergendal T, Engquist B. Implant-supported overdentures: A longitudinal prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:253-62. 8. Carlsson GE, Lindquist LW, Jemt T. Long-term marginal periimplant bone loss in edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 2000;13:295-302. (See also reference Ekelund JA et al 2003) 9. Ekelund JA, Lindquist L, Carlsson G, Jemt T. Implant treatment in the edentulous mandible: A prospective study on Brånemark system implants over more than 20 years. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:602-8. 10. Eliasson A, Palmqvist S, Svenson B, Sondell K. Five-year results with fixed complete-arch mandibular prostheses supported by 4 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2000;15:505-10. 11. Ericsson I, Randow K, Nilner K, Peterson A. Early functional loading of Brånemark dental implants: 5-year clinical follow-up study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2000;2:70-7. 12. Friberg B, Nilson H, Olsson M, Palmquist C. MkII: the self-tapping Brånemark implant. 5-year results of a prospective 3-center study. Clin Oral Impl Res 1997;8:279-85. 13. Glauser R, Zembic A, Ruhstaller P, Windisch S. Five-year results of implants with an oxidized surface placed predominantly in soft quality bone and subjected to immediate occlusal loading. J Prosthet Dent 2007;97(suppl): S59-S68. 14. Gunne J, Åstrand P, Lindh T, Borg K, Olsson M. Tooth-implant and implant supported fixed partial dentures: a 10- year report. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:216-21. 15. Hemmings KW, Schmitt A, Zarb GA. Complications and maintenance requirements for fixed prostheses and overdentures in the edentulous mandible: A 5-year report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:191-6. (See also reference Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004) 16. Henry PJ, Laney WR, Jemt T, Harris D, Krogh PHJ, Polizzi G, Zarb GA, Herrmann I. Osseointegrated implants for single-tooth replacement: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:450-5. 17. Jemt T. Fixed implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous maxilla. A five-year follow-up report. Clin Oral Impl Res 1994;5:142-7. 18. Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath M R, Hutton J E, Johns R B, McKenna S, McNamara D C, van Steenberghe D, Taylor R, Watson R M, Herrmann I. A 5-year prospective multi-center follow-up report on overdentures supported by osseointegrated implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1996;11:291-8.(See also reference Watson RM et al 1997) 19. Jemt T, Bergendal B, Arvidson K, Bergendal T, Karlsson U, Lindén B, Rundcrantz T, Wendelhag I. Implantsupported welded titanium frameworks in the edentulous maxilla: A 5-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2002;15:544-8. 20. Jemt T, Lekholm U. Oral implant treatment in posterior partially edentulous jaws: A 5-year follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993;8:635-40. 21. Jemt T, Henry P, Lindén B, Naert I, Weber H, Wendelhag I. Implant-supported laser-welded titanium and conventional cast frameworks in the partially edentulous jaw: A 5-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Prosthodont 2003;16:415-21.

22. Lekholm U, van Steenberghe D, Herrmann I, Bolender C, Folmer T, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Laney WR, Lindén U. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of partially edentulous jaws: A prospective 5-year multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1994;9:627-635. 23. Lekholm U, Gunne J, Henry P, Higuchi K, Lindén U, Bergström C, van Steenberghe D. Survival of the Brånemark Implant in partially edentulous jaws: A 10-year prospective multicenter study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:639-45. 24. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants. Clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Impl Res 1996;7:329-36. (See also reference Ekelund JA et al 2003) 25. Naert I, Gizani S, Vuylsteke M, van Steenberghe D. A 5-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants in the mandibular overdenture therapy. Part I: Peri-implant outcome. Clin Oral Impl Res 1998;9:170-7. 26. Naert I, Alsaadi G, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M. A 10-year randomized clinical trial on the influence of splinted and unsplinted oral implants retaining mandibular overdentures: peri-implant outcome. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2004;19:695-702. 27. Olsson M, Gunne J, Åstrand P, Borg K. Bridges supported by free-standing implants versus bridges supported by tooth and implant. A five-year prospective study. Clin Oral Impl Res 1995;6:114-21. (See also reference Gunne J et al 1999) 28. Polizzi G, Fabbro S, Furri M, Herrmann I, Squarzoni S. Clinical application of narrow Brånemark System implants for single-tooth restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1999;14:496-503. 29. Scheller H, Pi Urgell J, Kultje C, Klineberg I, Goldberg PV, Stevenson-Moore P, Alonso JMN, Schaller M, Corria RM, Engquist B, Toreskog S, Kastenbaum F, and Smith CR. A 5-year multicenter study on implant-supported single crown restorations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:212-8. 30. Watson RM, Jemt T, Chai J, Harnett J, Heath MR, Hutton JE, Johns RB, Lithner B, McKenna S, McNamara DC, Naert I, Taylor R. Prosthodontic treatment, patient response, and the need for maintenance of complete implantsupported overdentures: An appraisal of 5 years of prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 1997;10:345-54. 31. Wyatt CCL, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1998;13:204-11. 32. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: The Toronto study. Part I: Surgical results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:451-7; Part II: The prosthetic results. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:53-61; Part III: Problems and complications encountered. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:185-94. (See also reference Attard Nj & Zarb GA 2004) 33. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. Osseointegration and the edentulous predicament. The 10-year-old Toronto study. Br Dent J 1991;170:439-44. (See also reference Attard NJ & Zarb GA 2004) 34. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in anterior partially edentulous patients. Int J Prosthodont 1993;6:180-8. 35. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants in posterior partially edentulous patients. Int J Proshtodont 1993;6:189-96. 36. Åstrand P, Engquist B, Dahlgren S, Gröndahl K, Engquist E, Feldmann H. Astra Tech and Brånemark system implants: a 5-year prospective study of marginal bone reactions. Clin Oral Impl Res 2004;15:413-20. 37. Örtorp A, Jemt T. Clinical experiences of computer numeric control-milled titanium frameworks supported by implants in the edentulous jaw: A 5-year prospective study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2004;6:199-209.