Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529)

Similar documents
SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Feed Additive Approval An Industry View. Dr Heidi Burrows Regulatory manager

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

EUROPEAN COMMISSION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements

Lactiferm NCIMB 11181

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements Community Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives

The EFSA Journal (2005) 207, 1-6

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Opinion of the Scientific Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question N EFSA-Q )

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Safety and efficacy of Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME, a preparation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, as feed additive for lambs for fattening 1,2

Bacillus subtilis GR-101 Aspergillus oryzae GB-107

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for dairy buffaloes 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 30236) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

Influence of Effective Microorganisms on the Quality of Poultry Products Abstract Introduction Materials and Methods

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 19 September 2007

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the modification to the formulation of GalliPro and compatibility with formic acid 1

Safety and efficacy of Biosaf Sc 47 (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for pigs for fattening 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Calsporin (Bacillus subtilis) as a feed additive for piglets 1

The EFSA Journal (2005) 288, 1-7

DSM (FAD ; CRL/160006)

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements

TAK 59 NCIMB (FAD ; CRL/150002)

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of InteSwine (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1,2

Poultry The unique probiotic

Benefits of feed additives beyond growth related performance

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 3 February 2009

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. (adopted on 19 June 2002)

ANNEX. to the COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) /...

Autorisation of Feed Additives - the Risk

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

CHARACTERISTICS. Recovery rate. Spore of Bacillus licheniformis

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 3,4

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

DIGESTON-1B. Produktionsgemeinschaft F.u.H. Egger Ges.m.b.H. A-8413 Mitterlabill 19, Tel , Fax ,

DSM (FAD ; CRL/150019)

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA EXAMPLES OF INDIVIDUAL ANALYSES

Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union L 40/19

Enhancing animal health security and food safety in organic livestock production

DSM (FAD ; CRL/150021)

Biacid: A EU approved natural growth promoter for Broilers

Joint Research Centre

Scientific Opinion on modification of the terms of authorisation of VevoVitall (Benzoic acid) as a feed additive for weaned piglets 1

Official Journal of the European Union

Official Journal of the European Union

Approaches for 100 percent organic feed to organic poultry in Sweden

The effect of probiotics on animal health: a focus on host s natural intestinal defenses

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. (Adopted on 4 December 2002)

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Gut Health in Poultry - The World Within

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Chicken Vet Starter Kit

The EFSA Journal (2004) 96, 1-5

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus brevis (DSMZ 21982) as a silage additive for all species 1,2

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus kefiri (DSM 19455) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

New feed ingredients based on glycerol esters

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

The EFSA Journal (2005) 171, 1-5

Safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus diolivorans DSM as a silage additive for all animal species

CNCM I-1079 (FAD ; CRL/100166)

EFFECT OF SUPPLEMENTATION OF ORGANIC ACIDS ON LAYING PERFORMANCE, BODY FATNESS AND EGG QUALITY OF HENS. Abstract

The EFSA Journal (2005) 262, 1-6

Effect of a Synbiotic Formula for reducing C. jejuni in infected broilers. EURL - Campylobacter workshop

El impacto de los diformados dietéticos en la salud intestinal en las aves de corral como una alternativa a los antibióticos promotores de crecimiento

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. EFSA Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) 2,3

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 22963) as a silage additive for all species 1

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (NCIMB 40027) as a silage additive for all animal species 1

The costs of poultry production diseases: what do we actually know?

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Efficacy of the product Levucell SC20/Levucell SC10ME (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) as feed additive for leisure horses 1

Mr Maarten van der Heijden

The Effect of Prebiotic and Probiotic Supplementation on Intestinal Maturity in Turkey Poults. Honors Research Thesis.

The EFSA Journal (2005) 287, 1-9

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus plantarum (DSM 12836) as a silage additive for all species 1

EFFECTS OF ANTIBIOTIC PROPHYLAXIS ON THE PERFORMANCE AND GUT MICROBIOTA OF GROWING BROILER CHICKS

Session 47.

Role of Food Matrix for Probiotic Effects

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Pediococcus pentosaceus (DSM 12834) as a silage additive for all species 1

BROILER. YIELD PLUS x ROSS 708. Performance Objectives An Aviagen Brand An Aviagen Brand

L 243/10 Official Journal of the European Union

The EFSA Journal (2005) 231, 1-6

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 16 July 2008

Veterinary Feed Directive (VFD) January 1, Can NOT use in Feed for Growth Promotion or Feed Efficiency

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

L 211/4 Official Journal of the European Union

The EFSA Journal (2006) 406, 1-11

Epidemiology of Newcastle Disease. By Dr. Jonathan Amakye Anim & Dr. John Tsitsiwu

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. (Adopted on 22 June 2000)

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. Adopted on 2 April 2009

Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed. (Question No EFSA-Q ) Adopted on 18 October 2007

SCIENTIFIC OPINION. Safety and efficacy of OPTIPHOS (6-phytase) as a feed additive for finfish. Abstract

Intestinal Integrity HDD Dr.Ashraf Farah

Probiotics: Concepts

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus buchneri (DSM 12856) as a silage additive for all species 1

EUROPEAN COMMISSION JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE Institute for Reference Materials and Measurements

Transcription:

Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL (CECT 4529) HISTORY SAFETY EFFICACY 1985 to 2018

4 SYNERGETIC COMPANIES Today, four different companies work in synergy within a single business system, validly maintaining their autonomy, characteristics and production specificity.

AGROZOOTECHNICAL CULTURES POULTRY AGRO ZOOTECHNICAL SILAGE

HOW CSL WORKS MATERIALS: - FOODS - FEEDS - EXCRETA... Isolation of LAB strains Production Pilot plant Characterization Selection Strain collection

Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL CECT 4529 HISTORY

1985 CSL isolates 19 strains of faecal lactobacilli from a «rural» adult chicken

1985 Choice of L. acidophilus D2/CSL from the 19 LAB strains The choice of the strain L. acidophilus D2/CSL over the other 18 isolated strains was due to: better bile-resistance better adhesion to the gut epithelium better resistance to the jonophorous antibiotic better performance in the production plant (recovery of UFC after the freeze-drying process)

Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL CECT 4529 SAFETY

SAFETY OF L. acidophilus (FEEDAP, 2014) The species L. acidophilus is considered by EFSA to be suitable for the Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach to safety assessment (EFSA, 2007; EFSA BIOHAZ Panel, 2013). This approach requires: - THE IDENTITY OF THE STRAIN to be conclusively established and - evidence that it does not show RESISTANCE TO ANTIBIOTICS of human and veterinary importance.

2012 Results of the last A-R test (FEEDAP, 2012) NOT TRASMISSIBLE

Lactobacillus acidophilus D2/CSL CECT 4529 EFFICACY

1993 Efficacy trial - D2/CSL laying hens - ISA WARREN HENS KEPT IN CAGE - TRIAL 1 = 7150 HENS - 3 GROUPS = 2 TR + 1 CO - TRIAL 2 = 672 HENS - 8 REPETITIONS = 4 TR + 4 CO - PROBIOTIC IN DRINKING WATER

1994 Efficacy trial D2/CSL broilers - SHAVER REDBRO BROILERS KEPT ON LITTER - TOT. 216 CHICKS - 12 GROUPS = 6 TR + 6 CO - PROBIOTIC IN DRINKING WATER

1995 Efficacy trial - D2/CSL broilers - SHAVER REDBRO BROILERS KEPT IN CAGE = 3 CHICKS/CAGE - TOT. 54 CHICKS - 18 CAGES = 9 CAGES TR (27 CHICKS ) + 9 CAGES CO (27 CHICKS) - PROBIOTIC IN DRINKING WATER

2007 No. 3 «in field» efficacy trials - broilers - ROSS 508 BROILES KEPT ON LITTER - 90.000 CHICKS 3 SEASONS 30.000 CHICKS/SEASON - 6 POULTRY HOUSES 3 TR + 3 CO (15.000 CHICKS/SHELTER) - PROBIOTIC IN DRINKING WATER

2008 n. 1 Efficacy trial laying hens - HI-LINE BROWN HENS KEPT IN CAGE - 160 HENS - 8 GROUPS = 4 TR + 4 CO - PROBIOTIC IN FEED

2008 n.2 Second efficacy trial laying hens - HI-LINE W 36 HENS KEPT IN (SINGLE) CAGE - 120 HENS 3 GROUPS = CO (D2) ; TR1 (D2 + SMP 3%); TR2 (D2 + SMP 4%) - PROBIOTIC IN FEED

2008 n. 3 Study of an analysis method for feed Ital.J.Anim.Sci. vol. 7, 405-409, 2008

2012 Efficacy trial of «MIX AVI» - laying hens - HI-LINE BROWN HENS KEPT ON LITTER - 2 POULTRY FARMS 480 HENS IN TOTAL - 2 GROUPS PER FARM = CO; TR (D2 + 14D) - 3 REPLICATES PER GROUP - PROBIOTIC VIA THE DRINKING WATER

2014 Efficacy trial- laying hens - HI-LINE W-36 HENS KEPT IN CAGE - 2400 LAYERS - 3 GROUPS = CO (D2) ; TR1 (D2 + SMP 3%); TR2 (D2 + SMP 4%) - PROBIOTIC IN FEED

2015 Authorization for D2/CSL (CECT 4529) in the EU: laying hens (feed + water)

Identification number of the additive 2017 Authorization for D2/CSL (CECT 4529) in the EU: chickens for fattening Name of the holder of authorisation Additive Category of zootechnical additives. Functional group: gut flora stabilisers 4b1715 Centro Sperimentale del latte Lactobacillus acidophilus CECT 4529 ANNEX COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING REGULATION (EU) 2017/2275 Composition, chemical formula, description, analytical method Additive composition: Preparation of Lactobacillus acidophilus CECT 4529 containing a minimum of: 5x10 10 CFU/g of additive (solid form). --------------------------------- Characterisation of the active substance: Viable cells of Lactobacillus acidophilus CECT 4529. ----------------------------------- Analytical method 1 Enumeration: spread plate method using MRS agar (EN 15787). Identification: Pulsed Field Gel Electrophoresis (PFGE). Species or category of animal Chickens for fattening Maximum age Minimum content Maximum content CFU /kg of complete feedingstuff with a moisture content of 12% Other provisions - 1 x 10 9-1. In the directions for use of the additive and premixture, the storage conditions and stability to heat treatment shall be indicated. 2. For users of the additive and premixtures, feed business operators shall establish operational procedures and organisational measures to address potential risks resulting from their use. Where those risks cannot be eliminated or reduced to a minimum by such procedures and measures, the additive and premixtures shall be used with personal protective equipment, End of period of authorisation [10 years from the date of entry into force of this Regulation To be completed by the Service responsible for the publication] 1 Details of the analytical methods are available at the following address of the European Union Reference Laboratory for Feed Additives: https://ec.europa.eu/jrc/en/eurl/feed-additives/evaluation-reports

2015-2018 The 5 more recent experimental trials 1. UniPg-IZSUM & UniTe: D2/CSL in organic layers 2. UniPg & IZSUM: D2/CSL in organic layers 3. UniBo: D2/CSL on broiler performance 4. UniBo: D2/CSL on intestinal chicken microbioma 5. UniPg & IZSUM: D2/CSL in rural broilers

2015 Efficacy trial UniPg-IZSUM-UniTe organic hens

2016 Efficacy trial UniPg-IZSUM organic hens

2016 Efficacy trial UniBo intestinal microbioma and metaboloma of broilers

2017 Efficacy trial UniBo D2/CSL effects on performance and microbioma of broilers

2018 Efficacy trial IZSUM-UNIPG D2/CSL effects on rurally reared broilers

1985-2018: summary of the efficacy results Laying hens The better GUT HEALTH (or EUBIOSIS) due to L. acidophilus D2/CSL has led to significant improvements in terms of: 1) Intestinal microbiota composition 2) FCR (kg feed/kg eggs) 3) Egg production 4) Egg quality (ESG, shell thickness, Haugh Units) 5) Saleable eggs (less wastage: dirty eggs, cracked eggs, etc. 6) Environment: reduction of volatile N compounds and faecal moisture within the poultry house.

1985-2018: summary of the efficacy results Broilers The better GUT HEALTH (or EUBIOSIS) due to L. acidophilus D2/CSL has led to significant improvements in terms of: 1) Gut microbiota modifications 2) Gut morphology (villus height) 3) Morbidity and pasty vents 4) Weight increment 5) FCR (Kg feed/kg weight increment) 6) Environment: reduction of volatile N compounds and faecal moisture within the poultry house.

SUMMARY OF THE ACTIVITIES OF L. ACIDOPHILUS D2/CSL L. ACIDOPHILUS D2/CSL PRODUCES BY FERMENTATION LACTIC ACID REBALANCES BY COMPETITION WITH PATHOGENS REBALANCES THROUGH ACIDIFICATION DEVELOPS AND STIMULATES GALT GASTRO-INTESTINAL MICROBIOTA MORE GUT HEALTH AND ANIMAL PRODUCTIONS

Commercial chickens are subject to INTESTINAL DYSBIOSIS. The outcome can be a TRUE PATHOLOGY or, more frequently, a SUB- CLINICAL MALAISE that worsens the flock PERFORMANCE. The INTESTINAL DYSBIOSIS: CONCLUDING REMARKS produces INFLAMMATION and alters the DIGESTIVE FUNCTIONS; damages the EGG PRODUCTION in quanti-qualitative terms (dirty and thin egg shells, liquid albumen, etc.); damages the BROILER PERFORMANCES and increases BROILER MORBIDITY; reduces the FEED DIGESTIBILITY and the FAECAL CONSISTENCY harms the ENVIRONMENT in the shelter (more pathogens, humidity, ammonia, H2S, etc.).

CONCLUDING REMARKS Each flock is composed by a mixture of HEALTHY, SUB- CLINICALLY ILL, and CLINICALLY ILL birds. The primary aim of feeding birds with L. acidophilus D2/CSL is to prevent or resolve the gastro-intestinal dysbiosis, namely to protect the HEALTHY birds (PROPHYLAXIS) and/or "SUB-CLINICALLY ILL birds (METAPHYLAXIS). That is why L. acidophilus D2/CSL is the NATURAL WAY to improve the productive performance of the so called HEALTHY flocks.

Probiotics and pathogens: the DOSE make the difference! THE DOSE OF D2CSL MUST BE HIGH ENOUGH TO EFFECTIVELY INFECT THE HOST. On the contrary a cause-effect relationship is not evident probably because you have generated a ASYMPTOMATIC CARRIER! PATHOGENIC STRAIN PATHOLOGY ASYMPTOMATIC CARRIER (NO EFFECT) LOW (NON INFECTING) DOSE HIGH (INFECTING) DOSE HEALTHINESS PROBIOTIC STRAIN

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION! takes care of the gut health since 1948