New Horizons The Future of IPF and ILD Talmadge E. King, Jr., M.D. Julius R. Krevans Distinguished Professorship in Internal Medicine Chair, Department of Medicine University of California San Francisco (UCSF) San Francisco, CA Conflict of interest disclosure I have the following real or perceived conflicts of interest that relate to this presentation: InterMune (Drug Study Steering committees) Actelion (Drug Study Steering Committees) ImmuneWorks (Scientific Advisory Committee) GlaxoSmithKline (Consultant) Boehringer Ingelheim (Consultant) Daiichi Sankyo (Consultant) NIH IPFnet (Principal investigator) UpToDate (Editor, Author) Talmadge E. King, Jr., MD Professor & Chair UCSF Department of Medicine 1
Slide courtesy of Luca Richeldi What have we tried King IFN γ Imatinib STEP Sildenafil Anti CCL2 Anti TGFβ Demedts NAC PANTHER NAC Johnson Cyclophosphamide Winterbauer Azathioprine Douglas Colchicine Raghu IFN γ TOMORROW Nintedanib INPULSIS 1 & 2 Nintedanib 1989 2000 2014 Raghu Azathioprine Raghu Pirfenidone Ziesche IFN γ Azuma Pirfenidone CAPACITY 1/2 Pirfenidone ASCEND Pirfenidone Shionogi Pirfenidone King Bosentan Infliximab BUILD 3 Bosentan Raghu Etanercept Ambrisentan Anti-inflammatory Immunomodulation Immunosuppression Kubo Warfarin ACE Warfarin Anti-fibrotic Anti-oxidant Anti-proliferative RCT IN IPF PANTHER 12 INPULSIS 2 14 INPULSIS 1 14 ASCEND 14 Raghu 12 Shulgina 12 Richeldi 11 Slide courtesy of Luca Richeldi King 11 Noble 11 Noble 11 Raghu 08 Taniguchi 10 Daniels 10 PANTHER 14 Johnson 89 Azuma 05 Ziesche 99 Douglas 98 Raghu 91 Kubo 05 Demedts 05 Raghu 04 King 08 Anti-inflammatory Immunomodulation Immunosuppression King 09 STEP IPFnet 10 ACE IPF 12 Anti-fibrotic Anti-oxidant Anti-proliferative 2
October 15, 2014 The FDA granted Esbriet (pirfenidone) and Ofev (nintedanib) fast track, priority review, orphan product, and breakthrough designations. We have have NOT found the holy grail! There is no cure for IPF/UIP. 3
Who Should Be Prescribed These Drugs? Who Should Be Prescribed These Drugs? Any age (usually >50yrs) Confirmed diagnosis of IPF HRCT with definite or probable IPF Excluded emphysema >> fibrosis Surgical lung biopsy IPF symptoms 3 months, worsening in past year 4
Approach to the Diagnosis of ILD: It Often Takes A Village! Primary Care Pulmonologists Radiologists Pathologists Rheumatologist Genetics Clinical History Physical Laboratory PFTs Radiology Chest X ray HRCT Pathology Surgical lung biopsy Multidimensional and multidisciplinary ATS/ERS Consensus Statement. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002;165:277 304. Tendency to be overconfident regarding our ability to make a correct clinical diagnosis of IPF UIP Lung biopsy improved the accuracy of the diagnosis Hunninghake G, et al. Utility of Lung Biopsy for the Diagnosis of IPF. Am. J. Respir. Crit. Care Med. 2001; 164: 193 196 5
Are Expert Panels Needed To Review All Cases? Clinical Panel Lung function Panel Radiology Panel Pathology Panel Definite or Probable Diagnosis of IPF 6
Who Should NOT Be Prescribed These Drugs? End stage IPF subjects, defined by the presence of at least two of the following: TLC < 50% of predicted DLCO, corrected for hemoglobin, <30% of predicted Resting p(a a) gradient >40 mm Hg O2 desaturation < 80% with exercise (walking on level ground at own pace for 6 minutes) on room air New York Heart Association Class III IV How should we assess effectiveness? 7
Choice of Outcome Measures FVC 10% decrease percent predicted FVC ABGs 10 mmhg increase A a gradient Exercise testing decline in 6MWD from 50m Other parameters: Dyspnea (UCSD SOBQ) Quality of life (St George s Respir. Questionnaire) Changes on HRCT Oxygen use Has the death rate declined in patients with IPF? 8
Death Rate in IPF Has Declined? 100 80 NSIP 60 % Alive 40 20 UIP 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Years Daniil ZD et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:899. Demonstrates Mild to Moderate IPF Patients Have a Low Mortality Rate Placebo patients from INSPIRE and CAPACITY Trials (n=622) 100 95 Percent Survival 90 85 80 0 13 26 39 52 65 78 91 104 Weeks 18 9
Death Rate in IPF Has Declined? 100 80 IPF patients in placebo groups from INSPIRE and CAPACITY Trials (n=622) NSIP % Alive 60 40 20 UIP 0 0 1 2 3 Years 4 5 6 7 Daniil ZD et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:899. New Paradigm for Effective Management of IPF/UIP 10
Goals of effective IPF management Relieve symptoms Improve exercise tolerance Improve health status Prevent and treat complications Prevent and treat exacerbations Prevent disease progression Cough, Depression, Sleep, Pulmonary rehab., Supplemental Oxygen GERD, Vaccines, PH New approaches needed?? Pirfenidone N acetylcysteine (Fluimucil ) Nintedanib Sildenafil (advanced disease) Reduce mortality Lung transplantation These goals should be reached with a minimum of side effects from treatment Where Do We Go From Here? Role Of Clinical Trials Tertiary Referral 11
IPF Drugs in the Works Biogen: ST 100 (anti integrin αvβ6) Bristol Myers Squibb: Lysophosphatidic Acid Receptor Antagonist NCT01766817 Centocor: CNTO 0888 (anti CCL2) Fibrogen: FGCL (anti CTGF) NCT01890265 Gilead: Simtuzumab (anti LOXL2) NCT01759511 GlaxoSmithKline: GSK2126458 NCT01725139 Hoffmann La Roche: Lebrikizumab NCT01872689 ImmuneWorks: IW001 NCT01199887 IPF Drugs in the Works MedImmune: Tralokinumab (anti IL13) NCT02036580 Novartis: QAX 576 (anti IL13) Promedior: PRM151 (Petraxin 2) Sanofi: SAR156597 (anti IL 4 and IL 13) Stromedix: STX 100 NCT01371305 12
IPF Drugs in the Works Cotrimoxazole NCT01777737 Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells NCT01919827 Inhaled Carbon Monoxide NCT01214187 Omeprazole NCT02085018 Allogeneic Human Cells (hmsc) NCT02013700 Sirolimus NCT01462006 THANK YOU FOR YOU ATTENTION. 13