San Mateo County Real Personal Income Bureau of Economic Analysis

Similar documents
Benchmark Report Business Operations Bureau

Sonoma County. Measures Up INDICATORS. Sonoma County. Economic Development Board. An Index of Sonoma County s Community and Economic Vitality

ARUBA RECENT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENTS AND OUTLOOK. Presented by Jane R. Semeleer President Centrale Bank van Aruba May 30, 2011

The Great Recession 1-2 Punch of Credit Crisis and Consumer Retrenchment

Economics of Cannabis and Demand for Farm Labor. California Agriculture and Farm Labor 2017 April 14, 2017

Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance Co-financing Policy Version 2.0

Dentist Earnings Were Stable in 2015

INFORMATION SUBJECT: UPDATE ON REGIONAL GRAND NEXUS STUDIES FOR COMMERCIAL IMPACT FEES USED TO FUND AFFORDABLE HOUSING

Silicon Valley Housing and Economic Outlook

Tuberculosis in Alameda County, 2009

Effective Tobacco Tax Reform: Evidence from China

Inclusionary Housing 2.0: Designing Local Inclusionary Housing Ordinances A9er AB NPH CONFERENCE September 21, 2018

Diagnostic Medical Sonography Program Report For Greater South Bay and Peninsula Region (Santa Clara and San Mateo Counties)

Tobacco Product Regulation: FDA s Economic Impact Analysis Frank J. Chaloupka University of Illinois at Chicago

Heavily concentrated alcohol consumption in India

2.1 Key Contacts for Self-Funded Member Inquiries. Help or Information Available from this Department Self-Funded Customer Service

SAN MATEO CONFERENCE CENTER. MONTHLY USAGE REPORTS January July 2008

Butte County Board of Supervisors Agenda Transmittal

OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO. Tom Capehart Agricultural Economist Economic Research Service U.S. Department of Agriculture

County Community Risk Profile: Spokane County

Is There a Shortage of Dental Hygienists and Assistants in California?

M E M O R A N D U M. Members of the Castro Valley Municipal Advisory Council

Office Report. Bay Area Fourth Quarter 2015

About Washoe County WASHOE COUNTY, NEVADA POPULAR ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT FISCAL YEAR ENDING JUNE 30, 2014

Assessment of Fair Housing Bidders Conference

Household Spending on Alcoholic Beverages by Demographic Characteristic, 2013

I N C R E A S I N G C I G A R E T T E E X C I S E T A X I S BAD POLICY FOR OREGON

Paul Glassman DDS, MA, MBA Professor and Director of Community Oral Health University of the Pacific School of Dentistry San Francisco, CA

CREATED WITH LIFE IN MIND

Proposed changes to immigration laws could cost California jobs, harm public health: Data tables

MARIN CLEAN ENERGY ADDENDUM NO. 5 TO THE REVISED COMMUNITY CHOICE AGGREGATION IMPLEMENTATION PLAN AND STATEMENT OF INTENT

Rising Food Prices Will Result in Severe Declines in Mineral and Vitamin Intakes of the Poor

Third Quarter 2017 NCREIF Indices Review. Fall Conference November 7, 2017

The Economics of Tobacco and Tobacco Taxation in Bangladesh: Abul Barkat et.al

THE PERRYMAN GROUP. 510 N. Valley Mills Dr., Suite 300. Waco, TX ph , fax

ALAMEDA COUNTY PFS ASTHMA INITIATIVE

Consideration of an Ordinance Establishing Regulation of Single Use Carryout Bags

Form 990. Session Objectives: Part II

Vestavia Hills, City of, AL

Summary of Results for the First Half of FY2015/3

Commercial Redevelopment Study

Report on Older Adult Falls Alameda County EMS Alameda County Emergency Medical Services Senior Injury Prevention

COUNTY PROFILE: San Mateo County, California

Farm Level Effects an Increase in Federal Cigarette Taxes under Two Scenarios: Keep vs Eliminate the Tobacco Program

Economics of prevention: improving health and reducing health inequalities?

Rules and Regulations for the Retail Tobacco Permit Program Article 19H of the San Francisco Health Code August 12, 2015

Industrial Report. Bay Area Fourth Quarter 2015

Submitted by: Jane Micallef, Director, Health, Housing & Community Services Department

San Mateo North - Coastal

Tobacco and Cigarette Taxes

2-1-1 San Diego Client Profile Demographics, Needs, and Referrals

Public policy and cancer prevention. E. R. Greenberg MD

APPENDIX C Public Hearing Notices and Transcript

San Francisco Alcohol Mitigation Fee Michele Simon, JD, MPH Research and Policy Director Marin Institute

Expenditure Share United States, 2003

AP Macroeconomics Schedule Fall 2016

Developing Health Equity Indicators from a Place based Perspective Corina Chung, MS Epidemiologist Heather Arata, PhD Health Equity Consultant

Dental Earnings and Expenses: Scotland, 2011/12

CITY OF EL CERRITO HOUSING ELEMENT UPDATE. Community Workshop #1

Episcopal Charities Annual Review. episcopal charities

Tuberculosis in Alameda County, 2012

Summary of Responses to the San Mateo County Civil Grand Jury Final Reports

Fisherman's Wharf Community Benefit District WHARF FEST SPONSORSHIP OPPORTUNITIES

Savannah :: Chatham. August rd Edition COMMUNITY INDICATORS DATABASE COUNTY CHATHAM. produced by the Armstrong Public Service Center

PROJECTIONS OF U.S. DAIRY PRODUCT CONSUMPTION, Reginald Adamus and Emerson Babb. staff Paper 384 June 1990

Cost-effectiveness, Affordability, and Financing of Cervical Cancer Prevention

San Mateo County SMC Public WiFi Program

County Community Risk Profile (2018):

Paul Glassman DDS, MA, MBA Professor and Director of Community Oral Health University of the Pacific School of Dentistry San Francisco, CA

Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Intake among EFNEP Participants An Evaluation Using the National EFNEP Database

Fee Study. Comparisons with other Bay Area Counties

THE ECONOMICS OF TOBACCO AND TOBACCO TAXATION IN BANGLADESH

March 21, Deborah Rubin Cultural Practice LLC

Second Quarter 2017 NCREIF Indices Review August 8, 2017

SAN MATEO COUNTY CITY SELECTION COMMITTEE

International Human Development Indicators - United Nations Development Programme

Tobacco use is Wisconsin s

Measuring the Illegal Drug Economy of Australia in a National Accounts Framework: Some Experimental Estimates Drug Policy Modelling Program Symposium

The Effect of the California Tobacco Control Program on Smoking Prevalence, Cigarette Consumption, and Healthcare Costs:

U.S. Inflation Monitor

Fourth Quarter 2017 NCREIF Indices Review February 9, 2018

Pharmaceutical Producer Responsibility Ordinances

SARATOGA CITY COUNCIL

DEKALB COUNTY. 1. DEKALB COUNTY LOCAL GOVERNMENTS, 2017 Appropriations by Fund Type Property Tax. Cumulative / Cap Projects. Net Assessed Value

Tuberculosis in Alameda County, 2011

Odilia I. Bermudez, Tufts University School of Medicine with John L. Fiedler and Keith Lividini International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI)

County of San Mateo. Inter-Departmental Correspondence. Department: COUNTY MANAGER File #: TMP-0716 Board Meeting Date: 7/11/2017

Russian food consumption patterns during economic transition and its effects on the prevalence of chronic diseases

Policies on access and prices

Healthcare Hot Spotting: Variation in Quality and Resource Use in California. September 2015

2019 March. Tobacco Facts: Consumption, Mortality, and Morbidity. Center for Urban Population Health University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee

CANNABIS. Working with local government and the cannabis industry to: Interactive Webinar Discussion on

Why has the Commission presented these fundamental proposals for change to the system of excise duty on tobacco?

Diagnostic Medical Sonography

State of the Region: A Broad Overview for Community Planning

EMPOWERMENT OF RURAL WOMEN FOR FOOD SECURITY AND NUTRITION

The Pork Consumption Characteristics of Chinese Urban Residents: The Outlook for 2020

San Mateo County Emergency Services Joint Powers Authority

Branson School Parent Meeting Marin s Alcohol & Drug Epidemic How To Protect Your Child

BIO-DATA DR. ANUBHUTI RANJAN PRASAD

Transcription:

San Mateo County Real Personal Income Bureau of Economic Analysis 2016 Update Produced by Marin Economic Consulting April 1, 2018 Jon Haveman, Principal 415-336-5705 or Jon@MarinEconomicConsulting.com Definition of Personal Income Personal income is the income received by, or on behalf of, all persons from all sources: from participation as laborers in production, from owning a home or unincorporated business, from the ownership of financial assets, and from government and business in the form of transfer receipts. It includes income from domestic sources as well as from the rest of the world. Personal income is the income that is available to persons for consumption expenditures, taxes, interest payments, transfer payments to governments and the rest of the world, or for saving. The data in this report have been adjusted for inflation into 2016 $ using the: Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers: All Items. Contents 1. Region - Among Comparables 2 2. Real Per Capita Personal Income 3 3. Real Total Personal Income 5 4. Population 7

1. Region - Among Comparables Figure 1-1: Real Per Capita Personal Income - Comparables (Rank) Figure 1-2: Year over Year Growth in Real Per Capita Personal Income - Comparables (Rank by Absolute Income Level)

2. Real Per Capita Personal Income Figure 2-1: Real Per Capita Personal Income Figure 2-2: Growth in Real Per Capita Personal Income

Table 2.1. Percentile Ranking Among All U.S. Counties Ranking by Levels San Mateo County 100 100 100 100 99 Ranking by Growth Rate Since: Year 2010 2007 2000 1990 San Mateo County 100 98 80 65 97 Note: Higher # indicates a higher ranking (1-100). Table 2.2. Real Per Capita Personal Income (2016 $) San Mateo County 105, 721 80, 860 89, 875 84, 678 54, 102 Silicon Valley 93, 707 71, 233 77, 172 78, 549 49, 286 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward 84, 675 66, 889 73, 523 68, 458 49, 003 Bay Area 81, 339 63, 855 69, 513 67, 161 47, 194 California 56, 374 47, 678 50, 575 46, 127 39, 482 United States 49, 246 44, 332 46, 094 42, 652 35, 987 Table 2.3. Growth in Real Per Capita Personal Income (CAGR: Cumulative Annual Growth Rate (%)) Y ear 2010 2007 2000 1990 San Mateo County 3.10 4.57 1.82 1.40 2.61 Silicon Valley 2.94 4.68 2.18 1.11 2.50 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward 2.93 4.01 1.58 1.34 2.13 Bay Area 2.90 4.12 1.76 1.20 2.12 California 1.74 2.83 1.21 1.26 1.38 United States 0.37 1.77 0.74 0.90 1.21

3. Real Total Personal Income Figure 3-1: Total Real Personal Income Figure 3-2: Growth in Total Real Personal Income

Table 3.1. Percentile Ranking Among All U.S. Counties Ranking by Levels San Mateo County 99 99 99 99 99 Ranking by Growth Rate Since: Year 2010 2007 2000 1990 San Mateo County 99 98 92 69 90 Note: Higher # indicates a higher ranking (1-100). Table 3.2. Total Real Personal Income (2016 $) San Mateo County 80, 855, 056 58, 213, 941 62, 359, 321 59, 936, 698 35, 176, 024 Silicon Valley 251, 527, 590 178, 550, 822 185, 666, 426 187, 950, 054 105, 890, 764 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward 396, 208, 164 290, 643, 517 307, 593, 172 283, 134, 202 182, 273, 474 Bay Area 625, 009, 126 457, 680, 762 479, 903, 966 456, 879, 809 286, 147, 698 California 2, 212, 691, 221 1, 779, 931, 367 1, 833, 371, 701 1, 567, 773, 757 1, 182, 885, 221 United States 15, 912, 777, 000 13, 713, 923, 876 13, 885, 178, 692 12, 034, 989, 795 8, 983, 306, 580 Table 3.3. Growth in Total Real Personal Income (CAGR: Cumulative Annual Growth Rate (%)) Y ear 2010 2007 2000 1990 San Mateo County 3.32 5.63 2.93 1.89 3.25 Silicon Valley 3.36 5.88 3.43 1.84 3.38 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward 3.75 5.30 2.85 2.12 3.03 Bay Area 3.62 5.33 2.98 1.98 3.05 California 2.41 3.69 2.11 2.18 2.44 United States 1.07 2.51 1.53 1.76 2.22

4. Population Figure 4-1: Population Figure 4-2: Average Annual Population Growth

Table 4.1. Percentile Ranking Among All U.S. Counties Ranking by Levels San Mateo County 97 97 97 98 98 Ranking by Growth Rate Since: Year 2010 2007 2000 1990 San Mateo County 97 87 87 65 60 Note: Higher # indicates a higher ranking (1-100). Table 4.2. Population San Mateo County 764, 797 719, 935 693, 849 707, 820 650, 174 Silicon Valley 2, 684, 199 2, 506, 572 2, 405, 875 2, 392, 767 2, 148, 481 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward 4, 679, 166 4, 345, 175 4, 183, 637 4, 135, 875 3, 719, 675 Bay Area 7, 684, 011 7, 167, 476 6, 903, 845 6, 802, 782 6, 063, 224 California 39, 250, 017 37, 332, 685 36, 250, 311 33, 987, 977 29, 959, 515 United States 323, 127, 513 309, 348, 193 301, 231, 207 282, 162, 411 249, 622, 814 Table 4.3. Population Growth (CAGR: Cumulative Annual Growth Rate (%)) Y ear 2010 2007 2000 1990 San Mateo County 0.21 1.01 1.09 0.49 0.63 Silicon Valley 0.41 1.15 1.22 0.72 0.86 San Francisco-Oakland-Hayward 0.80 1.24 1.25 0.77 0.89 Bay Area 0.71 1.17 1.20 0.76 0.92 California 0.66 0.84 0.89 0.90 1.04 United States 0.70 0.73 0.78 0.85 1.00