Mycotoxins and Toxicological Impact in Swine

Similar documents
Mycotoxin Detection & Solutions

mycotoxin-contaminated contaminated food or feed

Mycocheck Survey 2014

Various Impacts of Mycotoxins on Turkey Health and Performance

Mycotoxin Detection and Solutions

Mycotoxin Testing Solutions

Mycotoxins, MRL s & food chain contaminations

Deoxynivalenol: Known Facts and Research Questions. DON (deoxynivalenol) is a damaging toxin produced by the fungus Fusarium

MYCOTOXINS COMMONLY FOUND IN IOWA

MATERIALS AND METHODS 68

Food Safety Risk Assessment and Risk Management at a European Level

Free-Tox. No escape THE POLYVALENT MYCOTOXIN BINDER

Mycotoxins and Poultry Health Natacha S. Hogan

ProSid TM. Making a difference in fighting mould problems. Feed additives that give key benefits

Stored Grain Toxigenic Fungi

EAR AND KERNEL ROTS. When to look for: Mid-August to October (and during storage)

Coordinated by. Don Mahan The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210

MYCOTOXINS. Table 1. Origin of principal mycotoxins occurring in common feeds and forages. Aspergillus flavus; A. parasiticus

Mycotoxins Overview and Sampling to Testing

Burt Bluhm Department of Plant Pathology University of Arkansas Division of Agriculture

Helping the liver to detoxify mycotoxins

Introduction. Hypothesis

Mycotoxin toxicity to animals

Feeding Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) to Pigs

Alternative Methods for the Control of Mycotoxins

Quality Grain Management Effects on the Feed Industry. Ben Weaver Regional Account Manager

What is Mycotoxins? Introduction to Mycotoxin and Mycotoxicosis in animals

Aflatoxin: What is it, and why worry? Doug Jardine Professor Kansas State University

Mycotoxin challenge in aquaculture feed. Maarten Jay van Schoonhoven, Aqua Care Manager Olmix

Dr. Jerry Shurson. Department of Animal Science

Mycotoxins in high moisture grain silages and ensiled grain by-products

MYCOTOXINS INCIDENCE IN WHEAT CULTURE

Mycotoxin Petfood Binder

Overview of Mycotoxins in India with special reference to Aflatoxins. F Waliyar

Quality Issues Related to DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Dept. of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Mycotoxin Sampling & Interpretation

Removal of Mycotoxins during Food Processing

Aflatoxin Material Properties

Role of Seed Analysts in the Management of Scab Disease

The Fusariotoxins Zearalenon and Deoxinivalenol as Natural Contaminators of Some Basic Cereal Components in the Production of Combined Feed

The Impact of the Ethanol Industry on Pork Production

Mycotoxins and Swine Performance

EVALUATION OF THE EFFICACY OF A COMMERCIAL PURIFIED PHYLOSILICATE TO REDUCE THE TOXICITY OF ZEARALENONE+DEOXYNIVALENOL IN GILTS.

EFC-01 Fall Feeding Distiller Grains to Hogs. Ron Plain 1

The Problems of Mycotoxins in Dairy Cattle Rations

Opportunities for Using DDGS in Livestock and Poultry Feeds in Canada. Dr. Jerry Shurson Dept. of Animal Science University of Minnesota

MYCOTOXIN PREVENTION CLUSTER

Aflatoxins and animal health: Case studies from Africa

THE ROLE OF MYCOTOXINS IN PMWS FACT OR FICTION

Supplementation of High Corn Silage Diets for Dairy Cows. R. D. Shaver Professor and Extension Dairy Nutritionist

Ochratoxin-A: Its Cancer Risk and Potential for Exposure

MYCOTOXICOSIS. Disease related to one or more mycotoxins. Mycotoxin - "mycos" - mold, toxic metabolite

FEED ADDITIVES FOR MYCOTOXIN DETOXIFICATION EFFICACY & AUTHORISATION

Feeding Considerations for Byproduct Feeding

European Commission Fusarium mycotoxins Forum Brussels 9 10 February Update on Fusarium mycotoxins - data from the starch industry

Energy utilization of reduced oil-dried distillers grains with solubles (RO-DDGS) in swine

Fumonisins are a significant health risk to livestock, and potentially also to humans , B 2

Binders-premixture for all species of animals

The Significance of Feed-Borne Mycotoxins in Aquaculture

Stategic Planning for Mitigation of Fusarium Head Blight in Wheat

Mycotoxins in Saskatchewan Feed Grains

Monitoring & Surveillance Series

Aflatoxins in Malaysian food

Payback News. Capturing Value with Creep Feeding. protein, vitamins, and minerals, on pasture. When done correctly,

Fusarium-toxins. Frans Verstraete European Commission DG Health and Consumer Protection

Dr. Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Lecompte FINAL REPORT. January 14, 2011

FOOD SAFETY, TOXICOLOGY AND UTILIZATION OF MYCOTOXIN-CONTAMINATED GRAIN

Minnesota Wheat Research and Promotion Council RESEARCH PROPOSAL GRANT APPLICATION (2-pages maximum)

Regaining Competitiveness: Alternative Feedstuffs for Swine

Although 32 lb test weight is the standard, oat producers are paid on a 38 lb/bushel basis.

Zearalenone and Premature Lactation in Exported Dairy Cattle

MYCOTOXINS IN AQUACULTURE

TIMELY INFORMATION Agriculture & Natural Resources

EFSA mycotoxin occurrence, data request & exposure assessment

An integrated approach to mycotoxin testing in the poultry feed chain. Bankok, March 2010

Aflatoxin Effect On Health. Dr Subroto Mukherjee USAID/East Africa

New technology to reduce mycotoxins in grain

Keeping Control of Feed Costs in an Uncertain Market

Ochratoxin A In Freshly Harvested and Stored Durum and Hard Red Spring Wheat

HYATT LOWELL FROBOSE. B.S., Kansas State University, 2009 A THESIS. submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree

Corn By-Product Diversity and Feeding Value to Non-Ruminants

Quality Control of On-Farm Swine Feed Manufacturing

Feeding DDGS to pigs: What is new? Hans H Stein. University of Illinois. Urbana

VALIDATION REPORT Ochratoxin A ELISA (According to the Commission Regulation (EU) No 519/2014)

Summary Report 3/2/05. Guowu Xu, Mark Whitney, and Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Mycotoxins and metabolites, toxicity and implications

Last findings on T2/HT2 on malting barley and behaviour from malting barley to malt. Dr Régis Fournier, IFBM

Presence of Aflatoxin M1 in Raw Milk for Human Consumption in Palestine

Effectiveness of Density Segregation and Sodium Carbonate Treatment-on the Detoxification of Fusarium-Contaminated Corn Fed to Growing Pigs''

Selenium Toxicity in the Western United States Pork Industry

Biomarkers and risk assessment for Deoxynivalenol

GrainCorp Feeds. Delivering you choice and flexibility

CANADIAN EXPERIENCE WITH FEEDING DDGS

ANALYTICAL METHODS IN DETERMINING AFLATOXIN B1 IN FOOD

Effects of Dietary Vitamin E Level and Source on Sow, Milk, and Piglet Concentrations of α-tocopherol 1

Slaven Zjalić, Department of ecology, agronomy and aquaculture, University of Zadar, Croatia

Summary of Distillers Grains Feeding Recommendations for Swine

Risk Assessment Studies Report No.5. Chemical Hazards Evaluation AFLATOXIN IN FOODS. April Food and Environmental Hygiene Department HKSAR

Biofuels: Consequences for Feed Formulation

Research Sells DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Transcription:

Mycotoxins and Toxicological Impact in Swine James D. House Departments of Human Nutritional Sciences & Animal Science, 408 Human Ecology Building, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2; Email: j_house@umanitoba.ca Introduction The North American pork production industry is heavily dependent on relatively few feed ingredients, including the cereal grains (corn, wheat, and barley), oilseed meals (soybean meal) and industry co-products (DDGS). As such, factors that impact the quality of these feed ingredients can pose serious challenges relative to the formulation of pig diets. One such factor that impacts the quality of feed ingredients is fungal infections. Fungal infections of crops typically occur either in the field or during storage, but infections can also occur if complete feeds are stored improperly (example: high temperature and moisture conditions). The susceptibility of major feed crops to fungal spoilage increases the risk for the presence of mycotoxins in the Canadian feed supply. The term mycotoxin is a generic reference to a heterogeneous class of toxic secondary metabolites produced by fungi. These metabolites can have a variety of toxicological effects, including reductions in feed intake, growth depression, liver and kidney damage, and impairments in reproductive health. Mycotoxins in the Canadian Feed Supply Table 1 provides a summary of the major mycotoxins, their associated toxicological effects and action levels for Canadian swine diets. Infections in the field by different species of Fusarium (F) fungi can lead to the presence of so-called fusariotoxins. The trichothecene family of fusariotoxins includes deoxynivalenol (DON, vomitoxin), zearalenone, T2, and HT2, as well as various acetylated forms, including 3- and 15-acetylDON (D Mello et al., 1999). Another class of fusariotoxins includes the fumonisins. From a Canadian perspective, the major species of Fusarium (F) species that affects Advances in Pork Production (2011) Volume 22, pg. 123

124 House feed crops is F. graminearum, however other species including F. culmorum and F. avenaceum, are present as well. In Western Canada, the infection of wheat and barley crops by Fusarium typically leads to the presence of DON (and its acetylated forms) in the cereal grains. A similar situation prevails in Eastern Canada, however zearalenone can be found at a higher incidence rate, particularly in Fusarium-infected corn. The presence of other fusariotoxins tends to be more sporadic in feed ingredients produced in Canada. By far, DON is the mycotoxin that is screened for most in Canadian feeds, particularly in years when fusarium infection rates are high. The presence of quick tests for DON is a primary driver of these surveys. Table 1. Overview of the major mycotoxin risks for Canadian swine diets Mycotoxin DON Zearalenone Primary Toxicological Effects in Swine Anorexia Immunosuppression Reproductive failure in gilts T-2 Oral lesions/ dermatitis of snout Lesions on Pars Esophagea region of stomach (ulceration) Major Risk of Exposure in Canadian Swine Diets Fusarium-contaminated small grains (wheat, barley); Wheat and corn DDGS Fusarium-contaminated small grains (wheat, barley); Fumonisins Lung damage Gastric ulcers Fusarium-contaminated small grains (wheat, barley) Corn (and wheat?) DDGS Ochratoxin Kidney damage Grains stored under less than ideal conditions (high moisture; insect damage) Aflatoxin (B1) Liver damage Corn and by-products from southern US Guideline Limits for Complete Swine Feeds 1 < 1 mg/kg (ppm) < 3 mg/kg <1 mg/kg <10 mg/kg < 2 mg/kg <20 µg/kg (ppb) 1 Guideline limits derived from Canadian Food Inspection Agency Factsheet Mycotoxins. http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/feebet/pol/mycoe.shtml

Mycotoxins and Toxicological Impact in Swine 125 Fungal infections also occur post-harvest, and these typically prevail when grain are stored at higher moisture contents or when other factors are present to encourage fungal growth (ie: insect or mechanical damage to the grain). Two storage mycotoxins that can be found in Canadian feed ingredients include ochratoxin-a (OA) and citrinin. These mycotoxins are produced from fungi, including Aspergillus ochraceous and certain Penicillium species. Levels of OA can reach extremely high limits (110 ppm) in grain samples in Western Canada, and surveys have documented significant levels of OA in human serum, particularly in residents of Western Canada (Scott et al., 1998), presumably through the consumption of grains or meat products contaminated with OA. Research on citrinin levels in Canadian grains is more limited. The survey of these mycotoxins has become increasingly more intense due to the fact that European standards are dictating much tighter tolerance levels for these compounds in grains destined for import into the European Union. While the above mentioned mycotoxins can be found in grains of Canadian origin, additional concerns arise due to the importation of grains and industry co-products from the US and elsewhere. The presence of aflatoxins, or toxins produced from Aspergillus flavus, in corn produced in the Southern United States raises the potential for this toxin to be present in imported corn and corn by-products, including co-products from the ethanol industry (Zhang et al., 2009). The conditions necessary for the growth of A. flavus are consistent with those present in southern climates (mild winters, warm temperatures, high humidity, presence of substantial inoculum, etc ). While aflatoxins do not appear to be a threat to Canadian grains, this may shift over time with changes in climatic conditions and the potential for importation of inoculum into a given region. The establishment of Fusarium graminearum, the species responsible for the production of DON in small grains, within the Red River Valley region of Manitoba is thought to be traced to the importation of contaminated seed corn in the early 1990 s. Toxicological Impacts of Major Mycotoxins A review of the major toxicological symptoms observed in animals consuming diets contaminated with mycotoxins is presented in Table 1. For the purposes of this review, discussion will be limited to the major identified mycotoxins of concern in Canadian swine diets, namely DON, zearalenone, and Ochratoxin- A. Given the substantial importation of American corn into the Canadian feed system, a review of the toxicological impacts of aflatoxins will also be presented. The major toxicological impact of the presence of DON in swine feeds is the associated feed refusal. Regression analysis of the impact of DON on feed refusal provided evidence of a reduction in feed intake of 7.5% (relative to

126 House controls) for every 1 ppm of DON in the feed (House, 2003). Current feeding guidelines for swine indicate the final DON content in swine diets should be less than 1 ppm. While these guidelines remain prudent, we have previously documented that DON levels up to 4 ppm had only minor impacts on feed intake in grower-finisher pigs (House, 2003). In studies with mice, the inclusion of DON in semi-purified diets has elicited impairments in immunocompetence, including reductions in secondary antibody response (Pestka & Smolinski, 2005). However, data from swine studies remains variable and inconclusive. In fact, much of the research with DON in swine is characterized by variability, due possibly to the confounding effects of other mycotoxins present in naturally-contaminated grains. The presence of zearalenone in pig diets is generally associated with disturbances in reproduction, due principally to the estrogenic potential of the mycotoxin. Zearalenone has been shown to have relatively low acute toxicity potential, but has a high affinity for the estrogen receptors α and β. Classic exposure symptoms include reddening and swelling of the vulva in gilts and sows, disruption in the maturation of ovarian follicles, and decreased luteinizing hormone and progesterone secretion (Zinedine et al., 2007). The latter effects are associated with reduced litter sizes and reductions in conception rates. Boars exposed to zearalenone exhibit depressed libido, presumably due to a reduction in testosterone secretion. Evidence of an effect of zearalenone on immune suppression is limited to in vitro studies and experiments in rodents using high exposure levels via injection. Within the Balkans, a disease called Endemic Nephropathy, a chronic interstitial renal disease, has been linked to the consumption of grains that contain Ochratoxin-A (OA). The link between OA contaminated grain and nephropathy arose from the knowledge that outbreaks of nephropathy in Scandinavian pigs could be attributed to the consumption of grains containing OA. This was confirmed in subsequent controlled feeding trials. Levels of OA can reach extremely high levels (110 ppm) in grain samples in Western Canada, and surveys have documented significant levels of OA in human serum, particularly in residents of Western Canada (Scott et al., 1998), presumably through the consumption of grains or meat products contaminated with OA. Studies in our lab have documented that OA leads to significant reductions in feed intake, with concomitant reductions in weight gain of young pigs (Aukema et al., 2004). Renal biopsy samples taken from pigs exposed to OA showed marked fibrosis following 4 weeks of consuming diets containing OA at levels of 4 and 6 ppm. The same pigs also showed marked elevations in serum creatinine, indicative of a decline in renal function. While the above-mentioned mycotoxins can be found in feed ingredients of Canadian origin, the importation of corn and corn by-products from the US and elsewhere creates risks for the exposure of pigs to aflatoxins. First identified as the primary compound responsible for the death of turkeys in

Mycotoxins and Toxicological Impact in Swine 127 England during the 1960 s (Turkey X disease), aflatoxins have since been extensively studied. The primary pathology associated with aflatoxin ingestion is liver damage. Additional symptoms, including reduced feed intake, reproductive dysfunction, and immune dysfunction may be secondary to hepatic affects. The etiology of mycotoxicosis is not straight forward. Research in various animal models has studied the impact of singular exposure to purified mycotoxins with a resultant assessment of the toxicological outcomes. In reality, swine are likely exposed to multiple dietary toxicants, complicating the clinical presentation of mycotoxin-related pathologies and leading to variability in responses. From a practical standpoint, avoiding the risk of mycotoxins is the best practice; however this is not a simple task. Mycotoxin Mitigation Strategies A number of strategies have been developed and promoted for mitigating the risks associated with mycotoxins in swine diets. Strategy 1: Avoidance. This sounds simple, but in reality it is difficult to achieve. Establishing clear maximum permissible levels of mycotoxins in swine ingredients is currently industry practice for DON and aflatoxins. The enforcement of these specifications is aided by the availability of relatively quick and inexpensive tests for the presence of DON and aflatoxins that can be performed in a quality control lab at an elevator or feed company. At present, quick tests are not readily available for other mycotoxins, including OA, however they are in the development stages. Strategy 2: Binders and Detoxifiers. Significant research effort has been placed into the development of agents to bind mycotoxins, thus making them unavailable for absorption. For example, clays, bentonites, and organic polymers, including yeast cell wall extracts, have been examined for their potential to reduce the severity of DON-induced feed refusal (Mahan, 2010). Beyond subtle changes in biochemical profiles, the evidence to support their current usage for DON-contaminated feeds is underwhelming. Evidence for the potential effectiveness of a cocktail product (antioxidants, amino acids, preservatives, etc..) towards increasing feed intake in young pigs consuming diets with high levels of DON has recently been reported (Mahan, 2010). Adsorbents have been shown to be effective for certain mycotoxins, including aflatoxins. Other approaches to mitigating the risk associated with confirmed mycotoxin presence in swine

128 House feeds includes the use of biological agents, including enzymes and microorganisms to degrade the mycotoxin. For example, the incubation of DON-contaminated grains with the intestinal contents from chickens led to a reduction in the DON content. When fed to pigs, improvements in feed intake and weight gain were noted (He et al., 1993). Further research is warranted in order to yield an effective and commercially available product. Strategy 3: Chemical Detoxification. The treatment of DON- or aflatoxin-contaminated grains with heat and wet alkaline conditions has been shown to effectively reduce the level of the corresponding mycotoxin. For example, the incubation barley, that had an initial DON content of 19 ppm, with 1 M sodium carbonate at 80 degrees Celsius resulted in the complete removal of DON from the grain (Abramson et al., 2005). While effective, the practicality of treating feed grains with moist alkaline conditions is questionable. Where opportunity for this approach may be feasible is as an additional step during the processing of corn or wheat into ethanol, where water and heat are already part of the process. An examination of the mycotoxin levels in corn DDGS (Zhang et al., 2009) provides evidence that, while overall contamination levels are low, the risk for this product to serve as an additional source of DON is real. In Canada, the use of wheat-based DDGS may present additional challenges. An adjunct strategy, such as a chemical detoxification process, may prove advantageous in years of heavy contamination. Strategy 4: Physical Detoxification. In general, mycotoxin levels are concentrated on the outermost portion of the grain kernel. As such, the removal of the outer hull of cereal grains has proven to be an effective means of reducing the level of mycotoxins in the final product. By pearling DON-contaminated barley, for example, the removal of 15% of the weight of the barley kernel, roughly equivalent to the hull fraction, 85% of the DON can be removed (House et al., 2003). Effective co-product management strategies (contaminated hulls) and an overall economic assessment of the processes are warranted to determine the overall feasibility of this, and other, mitigation approaches. Summary The complex etiology of mycotoxicosis necessitates increased vigilance with respect to the screening and mitigation of risk associated with mycotoxincontaminated grains. New feed ingredients and increased complexity with respect to feed ration development creates a more complicated backdrop for identifying the toxicological impacts of mycotoxins in swine diets. As such, the

Mycotoxins and Toxicological Impact in Swine 129 development of practical and affordable mitigation strategies will remain critical for the advancement of the Canadian swine sector. References Abramson, D., House, J.D., and Nyachoti, C.M. 2005. Reduction of deoxynivalenol in barley by treatment with aqueous sodium carbonate and heat. Mycopathologia 160:297-301. Aukema, H.M., House, J.D., Bankovic-Calic, N., and Ogborn, M.R. 2004. Increased renal fibrosis and expression of renal phoshpatidylinositol- 4-kinaseβ and phospholipase Cγ1 proteins in piglets exposed to Ochratoxin-A. Nephron Physiol. 96: 19-25. D Mello, J.P.F., Placinta, C.M., and Macdonald, A.M.C. 1999. Fusarium mycotoxins: a review of global implications for animal health, welfare and productivity. Anim. Feed Sci. Technol. 80: 183-205. He, P., Young, L.G., and Forsberg, C. 1993. Microbially detoxified vomitoxincontaminated corn for young pigs. J. Anim. Sci. 71: 963-967. House, J.D. 2003. In search of a magic bullet! Strategies for dealing with Fusarium-contaminated grains in the swine industry. Proceedings of the 2003 Manitoba Swine Seminar, Volume 17:133-144. House, J.D., Nyachoti, C.M., and Abramson, D. 2003. Deoxynivalenol removal from barley intended as swine feed through the use of an abrasive pearling procedure. J. Agric. Food Chem. 51: 5172-5175. Mahan, D. 2010. Evaluation of three commercial mycotoxin inhibitors added to Vomitoxin (DON) contaminated corn diets for weanling pigs: A report from the NCCC-042, S-1044, and NCERA-89 Regional Committees on Swine Nutrition and Management. Accessed: http://porkinfo.osu.edu/documents/vomitoxnfinalreport07-16- 20101.pdf (November, 2010). Pestka, J.J., and Smolinski, A.T. 2005. Deoxynivalenol: Toxicology and potential effects on humans. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health B. 8: 39-69. Scott, P.M., Kanhere, S.R., Lau, B.P., Lewis, D.A., Hayward, S., Ryan, J.J., and Kuiper-Goodman, T. 1998. Survey of Canadian human blood plasma for ochratoxin A. Food Addit. Contam. 15: 555-562 Zhang, Y., Caupert, J., Imerman, P.M., Richard, J.L., and Shurson, G.C. 2009. The occurrence and concentration of mycotoxins in U.S. distillers dried grains will soluble. J. Agric. Food Chem. 57: 9828-9837. Zinedine, A., Soriano, J.M., Molto, J.C., and Manes, J. 2007. Review on the toxicity, occurrence, metabolism, detoxification, regulations and intake of zearalenone: An oestrogenic mycotoxin. Food Chem. Toxicol. 45: 1-18.