Co-Chairs Helen J MacKay and Diane Provencher On behalf of the OV21/PETROC Investigators CCTG, NCRI (UK), GEICO and SWOG

Similar documents
Tarceva Trial EORTC 55041

GOG-172: Survival Outcomes

FoROMe Lausanne 6 février Anita Wolfer MD-PhD Cheffe de clinique Département d Oncologie, CHUV

Current state of upfront treatment for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer

The Ohio State University Approach to Advanced Ovarian Cancer Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology

Controversies in the Management of Advanced Ovarian Cancer

PROGNOSTIC FACTORS AND FIRST LINE CHEMOTHERAPY IN AOC

Clinical Trials. Ovarian Cancer

Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al: Cancer statistics, CA: Cancer J Clin 59(4):225-49, 2009

ACRIN Gynecologic Committee

Randomized Phase III Trials of Intravenous vs. Intraperitoneal Therapy in Optimal Ovarian Cancer

U T C H. No disclosure

Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University Optimizing First Line Treatment of Advanced Ovarian Cancer

RANDOMISED PHASE III STUDY OF ERLOTINIB VERSUS OBSERVATION IN PATIENTS WITH NO EVIDENCE OF DISEASE PROGRESSION AFTER FIRST LINE, PLATINUM-BASED

Side Effects. PFS (months) Study Regimen No. patients. OS (months)

The OReO Study. Study design & Protocol Study design Key Inclusion criteria Patient population Recruitment and retention tools

Intraperitoneal chemotherapy: where are we going? A. Gadducci Pisa

GOG212: Taxane Maintenance

Eligibility Form. 1. Patient Profile. (This form must be completed before the first dose is dispensed.) Request prior approval for enrolment

TRUST Trial on Radical Upfront Surgical Therapy

Trial record 1 of 1 for:

GCIG Rare Tumour Brainstorming Day

Residual Tumor Following Surgery: The Strongest Prognostic Factor or a Myth? Philipp Harter, MD Kliniken Essen Mitte Essen, Germany

Immune Therapy in Clear Cell Ovarian Cancer (ITICC) Hal Hirte Canadian Cancer Clinical Trials Group

Marcello Deraco M.D. Responsible Peritoneal Malignancies

Review Heated Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Management of Ovarian Cancer

Epithelial Ovarian Cancer

MITO Phase III TRIALS. May 2009

Hitting the High Points Gynecologic Oncology Review

Table Selected Clinical Trials of Anti-Angiogenesis Therapy in Gynecologic Malignancies

The role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with advanced (stage IIIC) epithelial ovarian cancer

New targets in endometrial and ovarian cancer

( Dedrick et al 1978 ) ( Armstrong et al 2006 )

Original Research. Background

A Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup Study of the NCIC Clinical Trials Group (NCIC CTG), the European Organization for Research and

TREATMENT FOR RELAPSING PLATINUM SENSITIVE EPITHELIAL OVARIAN CANCER

GOOVIPPC. Protocol Code: Gynecology. Tumour Group: Paul Hoskins. Contact Physician: James Conklin. Contact Pharmacist:

New Treatments for Early Ovarian Cancer. Jonathan Ledermann UCL Cancer Institute University College London

Carcinosarcoma Trial rial in s a in rare malign rare mali ancy

symposium article Optimal primary therapy of ovarian cancer M. A. Bookman* introduction symposium article

ESMO SUMMIT AFRICA. Latest evidence and current standard of care in advanced ovarian cancer. C.Sessa. Cape Town February 2018

Current GCIG Trials in Ovarian Cancer

DATE: 22 May 2013 CONTEXT AND POLICY ISSUES

AHFS Final. IV and intraperitoneal regimen for. Criteria Used in. Strength. Strength. Use: Based on. taxane (either IV. following

J Clin Oncol 26: by American Society of Clinical Oncology INTRODUCTION

Stratification Age (<40 vs vs >50) Current (last dose <6 mths) combined oral contraceptive use (Yes vs No) BRCA status (BRCA1 vs BRCA2)

Metastatic NSCLC: Expanding Role of Immunotherapy. Evan W. Alley, MD, PhD Abramson Cancer Center at Penn Presbyterian

Ovarian Cancer. Disclosure. Ovarian Statistics Educational Objectives. The State of Ovarian Care in the US Why aren t we making more progress?

CERVICAL/VULVAR CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS

breast and OVARIAN cancer

The Rationale for Immunotherapy as an Adjuvant Treatment for Locally Advanced BC

Laparoscopia & carcinosi ovarica. Anna Fagotti Gynecologic Oncology

Breakfast with Professor Advances in ovarian cancer first-line treatment : The role of anti angiogenics

Targeted Agents as Maintenance Therapy. Karen Kelly, MD Professor of Medicine UC Davis Cancer Center

OVARIAN CANCER Updated July 2015 by: Dr. Jenny Ko (PGY 5 Medical Oncology Resident, University of Calgary)

Survival impact of cytoreductive surgery ın advanced stage EOC

Evaluation of Optimal Initial Treatment Duration of Bevacizumab in Combination With Standard Chemotherapy in Patients With Ovarian Cancer (BOOST)

Contemporary Chemotherapy-Based Strategies for First-Line Metastatic Breast Cancer

How to fight a silent killer: Lessons learned from Ovarian Cancer. Stephen A. Cannistra, M.D.

Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup Cervix Cancer Research Network. Management of Cervical Cancer in Resource Limited Settings.

ASCO- GYN Abstracts 8/3/2011. Susana Campos, MD, MPH. Boston Mass. Prevention. Maintenance. Recurrent Disease.

Clinical study of a CT evaluation model combined with serum CA125 in predicting the treatment of newly diagnosed advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

EBS EDUCATION AND INFORMATION A Quality Initiative of the Program in Evidence-based Care (PEBC), Cancer Care Ontario (CCO)

Overall survival results of ICON6: a trial of chemotherapy and cediranib in relapsed ovarian cancer

Combined Modality Therapy State of the Art. Everett E. Vokes The University of Chicago

Surgical management and neoadjuvant chemotherapy for stage III-IV ovarian cancer

OVARIAN CANCER CLINICAL TRIALS

Rationale for VEGFR-targeted Therapy in RCC

INTRAOPERATIVE HYPERTHERMIC INTRAPERITONEAL CHEMOTHERAPY (HIPEC)

Treatment of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer

Two Cycles of Chemoradiation: 2 Cycles is Enough. Concurrent Chemotherapy / RT Regimens

OVARIAN CANCER Updated Apr 2017 by: Dr. Jenny Ko (Medical Oncologist, Abbotsford Cancer Centre)

Monoclonal Antibodies in the Management of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): 2016 Update Angioinhibitors and EGFR MAbs

Edinburgh Research Explorer

PERIOPERATIVE TREATMENT OF NON SMALL CELL LUNG CANCER. Virginie Westeel Chest Disease Department University Hospital Besançon, France

Improving quality of care for patients with ovarian and endometrial cancer Eggink, Florine

Ascites regression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in prediction of treatment outcome among stage IIIc to IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer

GCIG Cervix Committee: Chicago, USA May 30th Satoru Sagae (JGOG) Bradley Monk (GOG)

PSSV Presentation. TRIO 014 Study

Tratamiento Multidisciplinar de Estadios Localmente Avanzados en Cáncer de Pulmón

North of Scotland Cancer Network Clinical Management Guideline for Cancer of the Ovary

For personal use only

SOLO-1. Dott.ssa Elisabetta Sanna U.O.C. Ginecologia Oncologica- AOB Cagliari Direttore: Dott. Antonio Macciò

NCCN Guidelines for Ovarian Cancer V Meeting on 11/15/17

Outcome of patients with advanced ovarian cancer who do not undergo debulking surgery: A single institution retrospective review

Maintenance Therapy for Advanced NSCLC: When, What, Why & What s Left After Post-Maintenance Relapse?

Comparison of Platinum-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Primary Debulking Surgery in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer

Heterogeneity of N2 disease

Type of intervention Palliative care and treatment. Economic study type Cost-effectiveness analysis.

JMSCR Vol 06 Issue 12 Page December 2018

Gynecologic Oncology

The PARADIGM Study: A Phase III Study Comparing Sequential Therapy (ST) to Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Oncotype DX testing in node-positive disease

Lung Cancer Epidemiology. AJCC Staging 6 th edition

NAACCR Webinar Series 1 Q&A. Fabulous Prizes. Collecting Cancer Data: Ovary 11/3/2011. Collecting Cancer Data: Ovary

NCIC CLINICAL TRIALS GROUP DATA SAFETY MONITORING COMMITTEE Friday, 1 May 2009 SUMMARY REPORT

Ovarian Cancer: New insights into biology and treatment

Biomarker for Response and Resistance in Ovarian Cancer

PROGNOSTIC AND PREDICTIVE BIOMARKERS IN NSCLC. Federico Cappuzzo Istituto Toscano Tumori Ospedale Civile-Livorno Italy

Choosing Optimal Therapy for Advanced Non-Squamous (NS) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Transcription:

OV21/PETROC: A Randomized Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) Phase II Study of Intraperitoneal (IP) vs. Intravenous (IV) Chemotherapy Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Optimal Debulking Surgery in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Co-Chairs Helen J MacKay and Diane Provencher On behalf of the OV21/PETROC Investigators CCTG, NCRI (UK), GEICO and SWOG

OV21/PETROC: Background and Rationale Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is the 5 th most common cancer in women Majority Do of EOC women patients present with who stage receive III/IV disease. High mortality rate neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by optimal Intraperitoneal cytoreductive (IP) chemotherapy surgery results benefit in a 21% reduction in the risk of death in select patients following from upfront IP Chemotherapy? optimal cytoreductive surgery Increasing rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for EOC (approx. 40% in NCCN centres US)

OV21/PETROC: Schema OV21/PETROC: Schema ELIGIBILITY 1 Histological dx of EOC, fallopian tube or serous type peritoneal cancer IP No cisplatin primary cytoreductive or IP carboplatin? surgery diagnosis Clinical/imaging stage IIB-III M EOC at dx (Stage IV allowed, pleural effusion only) Minimum 3, maximum 4 cycles of platinum based neoadjuvant chemo Optimal (<1cm) cytoreductive surgery within 6 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy ECOG 0-2 Stratification variables: Cooperative group Residual disease: macroscopic vs. microscopic Reason for NACT: non-resectable disease vs. other Timing of IP catheter insertion: intra-operative vs. postoperative * AUC 5 (measured GFR)/AUC 6 (calculated GFR) R A N D O I Z A T I O N 1:1:1 2 3 Carboplatin AUV5/6* IV Day1 Paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 IV Day 8 Q 21 days X 3 cycles X Cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 IP Day 1 Paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 IP Day 8 Q 21 days x 3 cycles Carboplatin AUC 5/6* IP Day 1 Paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 IP Day 8 Q 21 days x 3 cycles Presented by: Dr. Helen J MacKay

OV21/PETROC: Statistical Plan First Stage: 3 Arm Phase II Pick the winner design (N=50 each arm) 9-month progression rate post randomization. Futility/superiority rule Assume that the 9-month PD rate in IV arm will be 40%. Stop trial if neither arm is at least 5% better. If only 1 arm is 5% better that is the one selected. If both IP arms meet the 5% better rule, select highest Completion rate of treatment Toxic effects Feasibility

OV21/PETROC: Schema OV21/PETROC: Schema ELIGIBILITY Histological dx of EOC, fallopian tube or serous type peritoneal cancer No primary cytoreductive surgery at diagnosis Clinical/imaging stage IIB-III EOC at dx (Stage IV allowed, pleural effusion only) Minimum 3, maximum 4 cycles of platinum based neoadjuvant chemo Optimal (<1cm) cytoreductive surgery within 6 weeks of neoadjuvant chemotherapy ECOG 0-2 Stratification variables: Cooperative group Residual disease: macroscopic vs. microscopic Reason for NACT: non-resectable disease vs. other Timing of IP catheter insertion: intra-operative vs. postoperative * AUC 5 (measured GFR)/AUC 6 (calculated GFR) R A N D O M I Z A T I O N 1:1:1 1 2 3 Carboplatin AUV5/6* IV Day1 Paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 IV Day 8 Q 21 days X 3 cycles X Cisplatin 75 mg/m 2 IP Day 1 Paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 IP Day 8 Q 21 days x 3 cycles X Carboplatin AUC 5/6* IP Day 1 Paclitaxel 60 mg/m 2 IP Day 8 Q 21 days x 3 cycles Presented by: Dr. Helen J MacKay

OV21/PETROC: Statistical Plan Second Stage: Two Arm Expanded Randomized Phase II Originally planned as phase III study. Trial design modified to Phase II due to low accrual and funding issues Primary endpoint revised from PFS to 9 month PD rate post randomization after consultation with DSMC Revised sample size 200 patients total (arms 1 and 3). 80% power to detect a 19% difference in progression rate at 9 months 2-sided, α=0.05 Secondary endpoints: Progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), toxicity, quality of life, correlative laboratory studies, outcomes related to variation in nursing-related practices

OV21/PETROC: Study Conduct Activated September 2009 Stage I accrual complete March 2013 Analysis of stage I (n=150) January 2014 Based on preplanned DSMC recommendation Stage 2 activated February 2014. Arm 2 (IP cisplatin) closed to accrual Key protocol amendment October 2014 to randomized phase II study, change in primary endpoint Closed to accrual May 2015 Data cut off, February 28 th 2016. Data analysis March 4 th 2016

OV21 ASCO 2016 Final Analysis Oral Presentation Sunday June 5 th Gynecologic Session Oral Presentation 10:45 AM - 10:57 AM