Opinion on. Classification of Musk ketone

Similar documents
TARGETED RISK ASSESSMENT REPORT ON SODIUM HYDROXIDE (NAOH) HUMAN HEALTH PART. CAS No.: ; EINECS No.:

Opinion on. Risk Assessment Report on TETRACHLOROETHYLENE Human Health Part. CAS No.: EINECS No

Risk Assessment Report on Hexachlorocyclopentadiene (HCCP) Human Health Part. CAS No.: EINECS No.:

Opinion on. Risk Assessment Report on NITROBENZENE. Human Health Part. CAS No: EINECS No:

Risk Assessment Report on Chlorine. Human Health Part. CAS No.: EINECS No

Risk Assessment Report on Tris (nonylphenyl)phosphite (TNPP)

Risk Assessment Report on styrene. Human Health Part

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE HUMAN HEALTH EFFECTS. CAS No.: EINECS No.: REPORT VERSION: Draft of 24 April 2001

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON TOXICITY, ECOTOXICITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (CSTEE) Opinion on the results of the Risk Assessment of:

A Weight of Evidence Approach to Cancer Assessment. Alan R Boobis Imperial College London

Opinion on Voluntary Risk Assessment Report on lead and lead compounds. Human Health Part

Expert Statement on Metofluthrin (CLH Report, Version 2 of May 2015). Professor Brian G. Lake, Centre for Toxicology, University of Surrey,

5.15 HEXYTHIAZOX (176)

Risk Assessment Report on sodium hypochlorite Human Health Part. CAS No.: EINECS No

This document is submitted by the lead registrant, BASF SE on behalf of the Methanol REACH Consortium

Hepatocarcinogenesis: chemical models

Assessment of the Health Risks from the Use of Metallic Nickel (CAS No ) in Toys

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Supplementary Table. Overview of IPCS requirements for analyzing cancer mode of action. Metofluthrin 1 Momfluorothrin 2

ICH Topic S1B Carcinogenicity: Testing for Carcinogenicity of Pharmaceuticals. Step 5

Hexavalent Chromium Oral Reference Dose

Risk Assessment Report on Vinyl acetate. Human Health Part. CAS No.: EINECS No.:

- draft scientific opinion -

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

IMPURITIES: GUIDELINE FOR RESIDUAL SOLVENTS PDE FOR CUMENE

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

REASONED OPINION. European Food Safety Authority 2, 3. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), Parma, Italy

Risk Assessment Report on. Bis(hydroxylammonium)sulfate. CAS No.: EINECS no.:

Risk Assessment Report on Alkanes, C 14-17, chloro MCCP. Human Health Part. CAS No.: EINECS no.:

5.36 THIOPHANATE-METHYL (077)

DOSE SELECTION FOR CARCINOGENICITY STUDIES OF PHARMACEUTICALS *)

Dithianon DITHIANON (180)

SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON TOXICITY, ECOTOXICITY AND THE ENVIRONMENT (CSTEE)

DISCUSSION GROUP 3. Mechanism of carcinogenicity. EFSA Scientific Colloquium on Acrylamide carcinogenicity, 22/23 May

Committee for Risk Assessment RAC

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Held on 20 September 2005 in Brussels MINUTES

Questions and Answers on Candidates for Substitution

Dose Response Approaches for Nuclear Receptor Mediated Modes of Action Workshop Preliminary Report

EFSA Info Session Pesticides 26/27 September Anja Friel EFSA Pesticides Unit (Residues team)

Regarding Establishment of a Uniform Limit in a Positive List System concerning Agricultural Chemicals Residues in Food etc.

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Joint meetrag of the Earopean Commission Scieatäfíc Committees and the Еигореав

Statement on two recent scientific articles on the safety of artificial sweeteners 1

Section H. Case Study: Risk Assessment Issues Associated with Chloroform

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU)

Received: 20 March 2014, Revised: 11 June 2014, Accepted: 11 June 2014 Published online in Wiley Online Library: 25 July 2014

Outcome of the pesticides peer review meeting on general recurring issues in mammalian toxicology

3-MCPD and glycidol and their esters

ECPA position paper on the criteria for the determination of endocrine disrupting properties under Regulation

ICH Topic S1C(R2) Dose Selection for Carcinogenicity Studies of Pharmaceuticals. Step 5

Role of metabolism in Drug-Induced Liver Injury (DILI) Drug Metab Rev. 2007;39(1):

Toy Safety Directive 2009/48/EC. Bärbel Vieth Federal Institute for Risk Assessment/Berlin FOR RISK ASSESSMENT FEDERAL INSTITUTE

To: Recipients of JACC 42. HV/mls/JACC 42 corrigendum Brussels, 15 December 2004

The Importance of ADME/PK to Inform Human Safety Assessments Based on Animal Studies: Example with Furan. Gregory L. Kedderis, PhD Chapel Hill, NC

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

ToxStrategies, Inc. and Summit Toxicology

Scientific Committee on Consumer Products SCCP OPINION ON. Toluene. (its use as a solvent in nail cosmetics)

Annex XV. 2,4 - Dinitrotoluene

APPLICATION FOR AUTHORISATION: ESTABLISHING REFERENCE DNELs FOR 1-BROMOPROPANE (1-BP)

Genotoxicity Testing Strategies: application of the EFSA SC opinion to different legal frameworks in the food and feed area

1 OJ L 354, , p OJ L 80, , p. 19.

B. Incorrect! Compounds are made more polar, to increase their excretion.

Official Journal of the European Union. (Non-legislative acts) REGULATIONS

Biocidal Products Committee (BPC)

FÜR RISIKOBEWERTUNG BUNDESINSTITUT

The Scientific Committee for Animal Nutrition is requested to give an opinion on the following questions:

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

Comments CLH proposal Cadmium hydroxide

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU).../... of XXX

SCCNFP/0694/03, final OPINION OF THE SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON COSMETIC PRODUCTS AND NON-FOOD PRODUCTS INTENDED FOR CONSUMERS CONCERNING METHYL ACETATE

COMMISSION REGULATION (EU) / of XXX

Biomarkers and risk assessment for Deoxynivalenol

European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

TECHNICAL REPORT OF EFSA. List of guidance, guidelines and working documents developed or in use by EFSA 1

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL. Directorate C - Public Health and Risk Assessment C7 - Risk assessment SCCP

The ICHS1 Regulatory Testing Paradigm of Carcinogenicity in rats. Status Report December 2017

Ongoing review of legislation on cadmium in food in the EU: Background and current state of play

5.17 PENTHIOPYRAD (253)

A case study in risk assessment: aspartame

COMMISSION DELEGATED REGULATION (EU) /... of XXX

Comparison Between the US FDA, Japan PMDA and EMA In Vitro DDI Guidance: Are we Close to Harmonization?

Official Journal of the European Union

Challenges of MoA/HRF under CLH

Risk Assessment Report on Diphenylamine. Human Health Part. CAS No.: EINECS No.:

Toxicity profiles of heterocyclic aromatic amines Bettina Seeger and Pablo Steinberg

BENZETHONIUM CHLORIDE

Please find below the Commission Communication and the Commission Recommendation for the substance zinc sulphate

FAQs on bisphenol A in consumer products

Questions and answers on boric acid and borates used as excipients in medicinal products for human use

AMENDMENTS TO THE IMDG CODE AND SUPPLEMENTS. Proposed amendment to the shipping provisions for FISHMEAL (FISHSCRAP), STABILIZED (UN 2216)

WORKING DOCUMENT DOES NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT THE VIEWS OF THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION SERVICES

(Text with EEA relevance) (2014/798/EU)

The Future of In Vitro Systems for the Assessment of Induction and Suppression of Enzymes and Transporters

ANNEX XV REPORT AN ASSESSMENT OF WHETHER THE USE OF MUSK XYLENE IN ARTICLES SHOULD BE RESTRICTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH ARTICLE 69(2) OF REACH

ACRYLAMIDE - EU Summary of Activities

Folpet (Pesticides) Summary. Risk assessment report. Food Safety Commission of Japan. Conclusion in Brief

A Wistar Rat Strain Prone to Spontaneous Liver Tumor Development: Implications for Carcinogenic Risk Assessment

Council of the European Union Brussels, 6 February 2017 (OR. en)

The European Commission's non-food Scientific Committees DG SANTE Country Knowledge and Scientific Committee Unit

Transcription:

EUROPEAN COMMISSION HEALTH & CONSUMER PROTECTION DIRECTORATE-GENERAL Directorate C - Public Health and Risk Assessment C7 - Risk assessment SCIENTIFIC COMMITTEE ON HEALTH AND ENVIRONMENTAL RISKS SCHER Opinion on Classification of Musk ketone Adopted by the SCHER during the 9 th plenary of 27 January 2006

TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. BACKGROUND... 3 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE... 3 3. OPINION... 3 3.1 Introduction... 3 3.2 Available data for evaluation... 3 4. REFERENCES... 5 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS... 6 2

1. BACKGROUND Musk ketone (CAS n. 81-14-1) was recommended by the relevant Commission Expert Working Group (CMR WG) for the 29 th Adaptation to Technical Progress (ATP) proposal for classification, among others, as carcinogenic category 3. The recommendation for carcinogenic category 3 was obtained by reading-across from musk xylene (which is classified as such since the 29 th ATP), since there are no test data on carcinogenicity on musk ketone itself. Physico-chemical properties are quite comparable for both substances and both musk ketone and musk xylene are phenobarbital-like inducers of liver enzymes (CYP 450) in both rats and mice. The expert group for risk assessments under Regulation 793/93 on existing substances agreed, when considering the draft risk assessment of musk ketone, to carcinogenic category 3. The CSTEE on 8 January 2004 concluded that the data available on [the carcinogenicity of] musk xylene can be used for the risk characterisation of musk ketone and that further testing is not needed (EC 2004a, 2004b). 2. TERMS OF REFERENCE The SCHER is asked to assess if the data available on the carcinogenicity of musk xylene can be used for the hazard assessment and therefore the classification of musk ketone. 3. OPINION 3.1 Introduction Both musk ketone and musk xylene are synthetic fragrances with wide application in cosmetics and therefore considerable potential for human exposures. The toxicology of both compounds has recently been summarized in detailed risk assessment reports by EU Chemicals Bureau (EU 2003a, b). General aspects of toxicity which may be relevant for classification will therefore not be repeated here. Musk xylene has been classified as category 3 carcinogen, based on a 80 week oral carcinogenicity study in mice and absence of genotoxicity. The classification of musk xylene as category 3 carcinogen is considered as a borderline case since an increase in liver tumours in the highly sensitive B6C3F1 mouse is considered of little relevance for human hazard assessment. Musk ketone has similar physico-chemical properties as musk xylene, but a carcinogenicity study is not available. Based on the structural similarities and the enzyme-inducing properties of both musk xylene and musk ketone in rodent liver, it is proposed to classify musk ketone as category 3 carcinogen based on read across. 3.2 Available data for evaluation To assess carcinogenicity, groups of male and female B6C3F1-mice were fed diets containing musk xylene (0, 750 and 1500 mg/kg diet, approx. doses of 0, 70-125 and 141-228 mg/kg bw for males and 0, 80 143 and 166 259 mg/kg bw for females) for 80 weeks. Both groups of mice fed diets containing musk xylene showed statistically significant increases in the incidences of 3

liver adenomas (9/49, 19/50 and 20/47 in males and 1/46, 14/50 and 13/49 in females for the control, low- and high-dose groups, respectively). Moreover, in males both musk xylene groups showed statistically significant increases in the incidences of liver carcinomas (2/49, 8/50 and 13/47). No details on non-neoplastic compound-related liver lesions were reported. However, a dose-finding study using a 17 week administration of musk xylene in the diet (0, 0.0375, 0.075, 0.15, 0.3, and 0.6 % in diet, estimated daily doses of 0, 54, 107, 214, 429, and 857 mg/kg bw) reported slightly increased absolute and relative liver weights and enlargement and irregularity of liver cells in both males and females receiving daily dose of 214 mg/kg bw (the lowest dose in this study not associated with mortality). In addition, musk xylene caused a statistically significant increase of adenomas of Harder s gland in male mice only (control 2/49, low-dose group 9/50 and high-dose group 10/47) (EU 2003). For musk ketone, a carcinogenicity study is not available (EU 2003b). Both musk xylene and musk ketone have been tested for genotoxicity in many in vitro and in vivo systems. Overall, both compounds are not genotoxic as concluded in the risk assessment reports (EU 2003a, b). To assess possible modes of action for the tumourgenicity of musk xylene to mouse liver and the relevance of the liver tumourss induced by musk xylene for human hazard assessment, a number of mechanistic studies were performed in rats and mice. These mechanistic studies focused on induction of xenobiotic metabolizing cytochrome P450 by musk xylene and musk ketone in the liver (Lehman-McKeeman et al. 1995, 1997a, b, c, Stuard et al. 1997). Enzyme induction may contribute to liver tumours formation in rodents and has been postulated to be involved in liver tumours induction by Phenobarbital. Phenobarbital is hepatocarcinogenic in rodents and the effects on the liver observed with musk xylene have been stated to resemble those seen in rodents administered phenobarbital. Therefore, liver tumours induced by musk xylene may also be a consequence of enzyme induction. Oral administration of nitromusks (0, 1, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, and 200 mg/kg bw for musk xylene and 0, 5, 10, 20, 50, 100, 200, and 500 mg/kg bw for musk ketone, daily for seven days) to mice induced similar changes in relative organ weight, increased total P450 activities, caused proliferation of the endoplasmatic reticulum in hepatocytes, and increased microsomal protein content in liver. Both musk xylene and musk ketone produced high levels of cytochrome P450 2B1 mrna and CYP 2B1 protein. Therefore, both nitro musks are inducers of cytochrome P450 2B1. However, musk xylene effects on the liver cytochrome P450 activities are different from those of musk ketone (Lehman-McKeeman et al. 1995, 1997a, b). While both musk xylene and musk ketone induce CYP 2B gene expression, the induced cytochrome P450 2B protein is present in an inactivated form after musk xylene administration resulting in a much lower CYP 2B1 associated catalytic activity. In contrast, high levels of active cytochrome P450 2B are present after administration of musk ketone. Studies have shown that a reduction product formed from musk xylene by the intestinal microflora, most probably 4-amino- 2,6-dinitro-t-butylxylene, and administration of synthetic 4-amino-2,6-dinitro-t-butylxylene cause a suicide-inhibition of CYP 2B1. Inactivation of cytochrome P450 2B1 by this mechanism results in a feed-back-loop-induction of CYP 2B1 biosynthesis producing high levels of CYP 2B1 in rodent liver. The feed-back-loop induction mechanism is relevant to liver effects of musk xylene since treatment with antibiotics (which blocks reduction of musk xylene by intestinal microflora to 4

the corresponding amine) abolished general liver effects of musk xylene and enzyme induction in mice (Lehman-McKeeman et al. 1997c). Due to its chemical structure, musk ketone cannot be reduced to an enzyme inhibiting p-amino metabolite and therefore induces, but does not inactivate CYP 2B enzymes in mice. Both musk xylene and musk ketone also seem to be weak inducers of cytochrome P450 1A in mouse liver resulting in a three to five fold increase in P450 1A protein concentrations resp. activity after the highest doses. In rats, musk xylene administration also causes an increased formation of catalytically inactive cytochrome P450 2B, presumably by a mode-of-action identical to that for musk xylene in mice. As in mice, musk ketone administration to rats also resulted in induction of catalytically active cytochrome P450 2B. However, in addition, musk ketone was a more potent inducer of CYP 1A1 and 1A2 in rats as compared to musk xylene. The mode-of-action of musk xylene in both mice and rats therefore seems to be identical, while some species differences in the pattern of cytochrome P450 induction by musk ketone are observed (Lehman-McKeeman et al. 1999). The role of enzyme induction in the development of liver tumours by musk xylene in mice and in the toxicity of repeated administration of musk ketone is not well defined. There are similarities of the effects of both musk xylene and musk ketone to effects of phenobarbital, which also induces liver tumours in rodents by a non-genotoxic mode-of-action and is also an inducer of cytochrome P450 2B. Musk xylene has been classified as a category 3 carcinogen based on the observation of liver tumours induction in a very sensitive strain of mice with high spontaneous frequency of liver tumours formation and similarities in effects on cytohcromes P450 in rodent liver. Assuming that the induction of cytochrome P450 2B is a relevant mode-of-action for liver tumours induction by musk xylene, read across based on enzyme induction and structural and physico-chemical properties may be sufficient as a basis for classification of musk ketone as a category 3 carcinogen since musk ketone is also an inducer of this enzyme. More detailed information on the mechanisms of enzyme induction by musk ketone is not available. Since the classification scheme requires animal data on tumorigenicity, musk ketone cannot be formally classified as a category 3 carcinogen since these animal data are not available. However, based on the comparison of the effects of musk ketone with those of musk xylene and phenobarbital with regard to enzyme induction a classification of musk ketone as a category 3 carcinogen may be supported. The SCHER recommends defining the role and importance of the tumour promoting activity of a chemical as a criterion for classification into categories of carcinogenicity. After this evaluation, the classification of musk xylene as a category 3 carcinogen should be revisited. Moreover, the classification of musk xylene and musk ketone as category 3 carcinogen has to be considered as borderline as stated in the RARs. 4. REFERENCES EC (2004a) European Commission (2002) on the results of the Risk Assessment of Musk ketone CAS 81-14-1 EINECS 201-328-9, carried out in the framework of Council Regulation (EEC) 793/93 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances Adopted by the CSTEE during the 41 st plenary meeting of 8 January 2004. 5

EC (2004b) European Commission (2002) on the results of the Risk Assessment of Musk xylene CAS 81-15-2 EINECS 201-329-4, carried out in the framework of Council Regulation (EEC) 793/93 on the evaluation and control of the risks of existing substances Adopted by the CSTEE during the 41th plenary meeting of 8 January 2004. EC (2004c) Opinion of The Scientific Committee on Cosmetic Products and Non-Food Products intended for Consumers concerning Musk Xylene and Musk Ketone adopted during the 28th plenary meeting of 25 May 2004. EU (2003a) European Union Risk Assessment Report, Musk Ketone, CAS No: 81-14-1, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. EU (2003b) European Union Risk Assessment Report, Musk Xylene, CAS No: 81-15-2, Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities. Lehman-McKeeman, L. D., Caudill, D., Vassallo, J. D., Pearce, R. E., Madan, A., and Parkinson, A. (1999). Effects of musk xylene and musk ketone on rat hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes. Toxicol Lett 111, 105-15. Lehman-McKeeman, L. D., Caudill, D., Young, J. A., and Dierckman, T. A. (1995) Musk xylene induces and inhibits mouse hepatic cytochrome P-450 2B enzymes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 206, 975-80. Lehman-McKeeman, L. D., Johnson, D. R., and Caudill, D. (1997a) Induction and inhibition of mouse cytochrome P-450 2B enzymes by musk xylene. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 142, 169-77. Lehman-McKeeman, L. D., Johnson, D. R., Caudill, D., and Stuard, S. B. (1997b) Mechanismbased inactivation of mouse hepatic cytochrome P4502B enzymes by amine metabolites of musk xylene. Drug Metab Dispos 25, 384-9. Lehman-McKeeman, L. D., Stuard, S. B., Caudill, D., and Johnson, D. R. (1997c) Induction of mouse cytochrome P450 2B enzymes by amine metabolites of musk xylene: contribution of microsomal enzyme induction to the hepatocarcinogenicity of musk xylene. Mol Carcinog 20, 308-16. Stuard, S. B., Caudill, D., and Lehman-McKeeman, L. D. (1997) Characterization of the effects of musk ketone on mouse hepatic cytochrome P450 enzymes. Fundam Appl Toxicol 40, 264-71. 5. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS Prof. W Dekant (rapporteur) is acknowledged for his valuable contribution to this opinion. 6