Advanced Technology Consortium (ATC) Credentialing Procedures for 3D Conformal Therapy Protocols 3D CRT Benchmark*

Similar documents
IMRT QUESTIONNAIRE. Address: Physicist: Research Associate: Dosimetrist: Responsible Radiation Oncologist(s)

IROC Liver Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Liver Phantom. Revised July 2015

RPC Liver Phantom Highly Conformal Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Lung Spine Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Spine Phantom. MARCH 2014

Evaluation of Three-dimensional Conformal Radiotherapy and Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy Techniques in High-Grade Gliomas

Intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for treatment of post-operative high grade glioma in the right parietal region of brain

The objective of this lecture is to integrate our knowledge of the differences between 2D and 3D planning and apply the same to various clinical

THE TRANSITION FROM 2D TO 3D AND TO IMRT - RATIONALE AND CRITICAL ELEMENTS

IROC Prostate Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Treating the IROC IMRT Prostate Phantom. Revised March 2014

IROC Head and Neck Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC IMRT Phantom. Revised MARCH 2014

IROC Lung Phantom 3D CRT / IMRT. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC Lung Phantom. Revised Dec 2015

IROC Head and Neck Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Irradiating the IROC IMRT Phantom. Revised April 2014

Treatment Planning Evaluation of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) for Craniospinal Irradiation (CSI)

RTOG DOSIMETRY DATA SUBMISSION

Additional Questions for Review 2D & 3D

Transperineal Interstitial Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy (TIPPB) Quality Assurance Guidelines

Evaluation of Monaco treatment planning system for hypofractionated stereotactic volumetric arc radiotherapy of multiple brain metastases

CURRICULUM OUTLINE FOR TRANSITIONING FROM 2-D RT TO 3-D CRT AND IMRT

Measurement of Dose to Critical Structures Surrounding the Prostate from. Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) and Three Dimensional

A Comparison of IMRT and VMAT Technique for the Treatment of Rectal Cancer

Chapters from Clinical Oncology

NSABP PROTOCOL B-39B RTOG PROTOCOL 0413

RADIATION ONCOLOGY RESIDENCY PROGRAM Competency Evaluation of Resident

Prostate Phantom. Guidelines for Planning and Treating the IMRT Prostate Phantom. Revised March 2014

3D Conformal Radiation Therapy for Mucinous Carcinoma of the Breast

ADVANCED TECHNOLOGY CONSORTIUM (ATC) CREDENTIALING PROCEDURES FOR LUNG BRACHYTHERAPY IMPLANT PROTOCOLS

Evaluation of Whole-Field and Split-Field Intensity Modulation Radiation Therapy (IMRT) Techniques in Head and Neck Cancer

To Reduce Hot Dose Spots in Craniospinal Irradiation: An IMRT Approach with Matching Beam Divergence

Defining Target Volumes and Organs at Risk: a common language

The Effects of DIBH on Liver Dose during Right-Breast Treatments: A Case Study Abstract: Introduction: Case Description: Conclusion: Introduction

Completion of Treatment Planning. Eugene Lief, Ph.D. Christ Hospital Jersey City, New Jersey USA

A VMAT PLANNING SOLUTION FOR NECK CANCER PATIENTS USING THE PINNACLE 3 PLANNING SYSTEM *

The Physics of Oesophageal Cancer Radiotherapy

SBRT fundamentals. Outline 8/2/2012. Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Educational Session

The RPC s Evaluation of Advanced Technologies. AAPM Refresher Course July 29, 2008 Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff

Quality assurance and credentialing requirements for sites using inverse planned IMRT Techniques

BLADDER RADIOTHERAPY PLANNING DOCUMENT

Assessing Heterogeneity Correction Algorithms Using the Radiological Physics Center Anthropomorphic Thorax Phantom

QA for Clinical Dosimetry with Emphasis on Clinical Trials

Stereotaxy. Outlines. Establishing SBRT Program: Physics & Dosimetry. SBRT - Simulation. Body Localizer. Sim. Sim. Sim. Stereotaxy?

Evaluation of the Dynamic Arc-Therapy in Comparison to Conformal Radiation Therapy in Radiotherapy Patients

Spatially Fractionated Radiation Therapy: GRID Sponsored by.decimal Friday, August 22, Pamela Myers, Ph.D.

Efficient SIB-IMRT planning of head & neck patients with Pinnacle 3 -DMPO

Institute of Oncology & Radiobiology. Havana, Cuba. INOR

Comparing Study between Conventional and Conformal Planning Radiotherapy

Measure the Errors of Treatment Set-Ups of Prostate Cancer Patient Using Electronic Portal Imaging Device (EPID)

NIA MAGELLAN HEALTH RADIATION ONCOLOGY CODING STANDARD. Dosimetry Planning

Radiotherapy techniques in brain tumors (2D, 3D CRT, IMRT) including craniospinal irradiation

ATC/NEMA/AAPM DICOM Demonstration. Walter R. Bosch, D.Sc.

IMRT for Prostate Cancer

Hybrid VMAT/IMRT Approach to Traditional Cranio-Spinal Irradiation (CSI): A Case Study on Planning Techniques and Delivery

TRANS-TASMAN RADIATION ONCOLOGY GROUP INC. Quality Assurance. Treatment Planning Benchmark

The Accuracy of 3-D Inhomogeneity Photon Algorithms in Commercial Treatment Planning Systems using a Heterogeneous Lung Phantom

EORTC Member Facility Questionnaire

What Can Go Wrong in Radiation Treatment: Data from the RPC. Geoffrey S. Ibbott, Ph.D. and RPC Staff

Reena Phurailatpam. Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy of Medulloblastoma using Helical TomoTherapy: Initial Experience from planning to delivery

Address for Correspondence: Department of Medical Physics, Khwaja Yunus Ali University, Enayetpur, Sirajgonj ,

A simple technique for craniospinal radiotherapy in the supine position

Quality assurance of volumetric modulated arc therapy using Elekta Synergy

REVISITING ICRU VOLUME DEFINITIONS. Eduardo Rosenblatt Vienna, Austria

Feasibility of 4D IMRT Delivery for Hypofractionated High Dose Partial Prostate Treatments

Normal tissue doses from MV image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) using orthogonal MV and MV-CBCT

Measurement Guided Dose Reconstruction (MGDR) Transitioning VMAT QA from phantom to patient geometry

Independent Dose Verification for IMRT Using Monte Carlo. C-M M Charlie Ma, Ph.D. Department of Radiation Oncology FCCC, Philadelphia, PA 19111, USA

Reducing excess radiation from portal imaging of pediatric brain tumors

The Effects of DIBH on Liver Dose during Right-Breast Treatments Introduction

Grayden MacLennan Case Study 1 February 28, 2015 DCIS Treatment with Conformal Breast Tangents and Field in Field Dose Shaping History of Present

A TREATMENT PLANNING STUDY COMPARING VMAT WITH 3D CONFORMAL RADIOTHERAPY FOR PROSTATE CANCER USING PINNACLE PLANNING SYSTEM *

WHOLE-BRAIN RADIOTHERAPY WITH SIMULTANEOUS INTEGRATED BOOST TO MULTIPLE BRAIN METASTASES USING VOLUMETRIC MODULATED ARC THERAPY

8/2/2017. Improving Dose Prescriptions for Safety, Reporting, and Clinical Guideline Consistency. Part III

MD 4300: Introduction to Medical Dosimetry (3semester hour) Course Syllabus for Fall 2009

Josh Howard CMD Upendra Parvathaneni MBBS, FRANZCR

IMRT Planning Basics AAMD Student Webinar

Radiosurgery. Most Important! 8/2/2012. Stereotactic Radiosurgery: State of the Art Technology and Implementation Linear Accelerator Radiosurgery

SBRT of Lung & Liver lesions using Novalis IGRT System. Patrick Silgen, M.S., DABR Park Nicollet Methodist Hospital

Quality Assurance of Ultrasound Imaging in Radiation Therapy. Zuofeng Li, D.Sc. Murty S. Goddu, Ph.D. Washington University St.

Case Study. Institution Farrer Park Hospital

Image Guided Stereotactic Radiotherapy of the Lung

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT)

Linac or Non-Linac Demystifying And Decoding The Physics Of SBRT/SABR

Knowledge-Based IMRT Treatment Planning for Prostate Cancer: Experience with 101. Cases from Duke Clinic. Deon Martina Dick

Potential benefits of intensity-modulated proton therapy in head and neck cancer van de Water, Tara Arpana

First, how does radiation work?

Clinical Impact of Couch Top and Rails on IMRT and Arc Therapy

Electron Beam ET - Reloaded Therapy - Reloaded

Accuracy Requirements and Uncertainty Considerations in Radiation Therapy

Radiation Therapy for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma of the Right Hip

Spatially Fractionated GRID Therapy: A Case Study Abstract: Introduction: Case Description: Conclusion: Key Words Introduction

Transition to Heterogeneity Corrections. Why have accurate dose algorithms?

Guidelines for the use of inversely planned treatment techniques in Clinical Trials: IMRT, VMAT, TomoTherapy

Introduction. Modalities used in imaging guidance. Flat panel detector. X-ray Imaging Dose to Patients in the Era of Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

Chapter 2. Level II lymph nodes and radiation-induced xerostomia

Dosimetry Comparison of Gamma Knife and External Beam Radiation Therapy on Brain Tumors. Research Thesis

Grid Treatment of Left Upper Lobe Lung Mass History of Present Illness: Past Medical History:

IGRT Solution for the Living Patient and the Dynamic Treatment Problem

DELIVERED PATIENT DOSE

Feasibility of the partial-single arc technique in RapidArc planning for prostate cancer treatment

EVALUATION OF INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY (IMRT) DELIVERY ERROR DUE TO IMRT TREATMENT PLAN COMPLEXITY AND IMPROPERLY MATCHED DOSIMETRY DATA

SRS Plan Quality and Treatment Efficiency: VMAT vs Dynamic Conformal ARCs

INTENSITY MODULATED RADIATION THERAPY: Next Generation 3-D CRT or Distinct Form of RT?

Transcription:

Advanced Technology Consortium (ATC) Credentialing Procedures for 3D Conformal Therapy Protocols 3D CRT Benchmark* Purpose: To evaluate an institution s 3D treatment planning process and the institution s ability to provide the documentation required to participate in 3D collaborative protocols. Note: This is not an evaluation of IMRT planning, and IMRT is not to be used. Definition: The following five components are believed to constitute 3D conformal radiation therapy: 1. definition of relevant patient anatomy in three dimensions, typically performed with computerized tomography (CT) 2. definition of both clinical target(s) and normal tissues, using ICRU 50/62 terminology 3. dose calculations and analysis in three dimensions, including the use of dose-volume histograms 4. an attempt to optimize patient set-up accuracy by immobilization or any other process 5. conformal treatment planning (by using blocks, multiple fields, or non coplanar fields) to maximize dose to the defined target and minimize dose to defined normal tissues Data Submission Requirements: Complete a treatment plan as described in Section 1. Submit all treatment planning data listed in Section 2. If you have any questions, please contact: Andrea Molineu, M.S. or Irene Harris, B.S., C.M.D. Phone: (713) 745-8989 Phone: (713) 745-8989 Email: amolineu@mdanderson.org Email: iharris@mdanderson.org or Dosimetry Phone: 713-745-8989 Email: hnnguyen@mdanderson.org Please return completed forms and supporting documents to: Dosimetry IROC Houston QA Center 8060 EL RIO St. Houston, TX 77054 Fax: (713) 794-1364 1

*Modified by the IROC Houston in 2003 from the original QARC version. Either version is accepted by both QARC and RPC. The RPC will inform NCCTG and QARC of institution s that pass this benchmark. 2

Section 1: Description of 3D CRT Benchmark The following benchmark is a sample case used to evaluate the treatment planning process at your institution, i.e., data acquisition, dose calculation and monitor unit calculations. The aim is to demonstrate your capability to participate fully in 3D CRT protocols. You will not be expected to complete separate benchmarks for different 3D CRT protocols, unless required by a specific protocol. Use of heterogeneity corrections is not allowed for this benchmark case to be consistent with current protocols. The following example uses a CT scan of a head. The benchmark case is not restricted to this anatomical site. The institution may choose to use a different anatomical site for their 3D CRT plan. Appropriate normal tissues for the chosen site must be contoured. 1. CT scan of head A. Use CT scans of one of your recent patients, in a supine position. The scan must include the entire head, from the top of the head through the base of the skull, including the full extent of the temporal lobes. B. The maximum slice thickness shall be 5 mm (taken contiguously); 3 mm or smaller slice thickness is preferred, from at least the top of the orbits through the base of the skull. 2. Target Volume (Figure I) A. Delineate the clinical target volume (CTV) as the inferior right temporal lobe extending superiorly to the level of the sella tursica. The posterior boundary of the CTV shall be the external auditory meatus and the petrous ridge. B. The planning target volume (PTV) shall be 3 mm larger in all dimensions than the CTV. 3. Normal Tissues (Figure I) 4. Treatment The following normal tissues will be delineated on the CT scans: skin (or surface) right globe right optic nerve left globe left optic nerve pituitary brain stem (from the top of the posterior clinoids to the foramen magnum) The treatment plan shall consist of two or more fields, of which at least one must not lie in the plane of the CT images (Figure II shows an example of a right lateral and a vertex field). Beam energy: 4 MV or greater Beam Portals: Design the portals from beam s-eye views (BEVs) (see examples in Figures III & IV); indicate the margin used and whether cerrobend blocking or multi-leaf collimator is used. 2

5. Dose Prescription The prescription dose of 6000 cgy in 30 fractions is the minimum dose received by 98% of the PTV. The maximum dose received by a volume of 2% of the PTV should not exceed the prescription dose by more than 7%. No more than 2% of the PTV and none of the CTV may receive less than 6000 cgy. The minimum PTV dose (encompassing > 98% of the PTV) is 6000 cgy. 6. Monitor Unit (MU) Calculation Use the forms and calculation methods of your department and calculate the MU needed to deliver 200 cgy to the prescription isodose line. 7. Dose-Volume Histograms (DVH) A. DVH Requirements: The sampling element must be at least as fine as the dose grid (i.e. < 3 mm). The dose shall be binned in increments of no greater than 10 cgy. Dose shall be displayed in absolute dose (cgy). The volume shall be displayed in percent volume (%), if available. If not available, be sure to also provide the volume of each structure. Histograms shall be displayed as cumulative. B. Calculate dose-volume histograms for the PTV and the CTV. Indicate the volume for each (% or cm 3 ) that receives the prescription dose, and 107% of the prescription dose. C. Calculate dose-volume histograms for all normal tissues that were contoured. 3

Section 2: Data to be Submitted The following data are to be submitted by original hardcopy in color to the RPC. If you have the capability, also submit data electronically to the Resource Center for Emerging Technologies (RCET) 1 or Image-guided Therapy Center (ITC) 2. Please make sure that target volumes, normal tissues, and isodose contours are readily identifiable. 1. All axial CT images on which the target volume or any normal tissues (other than skin) are delineated. (See Figure I). 2. Reconstructed coronal slice through isocenter showing beams, target volumes and normal tissues. (See Figure II). 3. BEVs for all fields showing collimators, beam aperture, PTV, right globe, right optic nerve, pituitary and brain stem. (See Figures III and IV). 4. Axial and sagittal CT image at isocenter with PTV and isodose contours superimposed. Show at least the 6420, 6000, 5800, 5500, 5000, and 3000 cgy contours. (See Figure V). 5. Axial CT slice at the level of the right optic nerve with the PTV, optic nerve and brain stem delineated and isodose contours superimposed. Show at least the 6420, 6000, 5800, 5500, 5000, and 3000 cgy contours. (See Figure VI). 6. Lateral and AP DRRs with PTV superimposed. (Include a linear scale.) (See Figures VII and VIII). 7. Dose-volume histograms for the PTV, the CTV, and all contoured normal tissues. (See Figures IX and X). 8. A printout of beam specifications, including at a minimum, the beam energy, gantry, couch, and collimator positions, field sizes, aperture names, wedge specifications, and depth of isocenter (or SSD). 9. MU calculations. 10. The 3D CRT Dosimetry Summary Form. 1 http://rcet.health.ufl.edu/ 2 http://itc.wustl.edu/ 4

QUALITY ASSURANCE REVIEW CENTER / RADIOLOGICAL PHYSICS CENTER 3D CRT DOSIMETRY SUMMARY INSTITUTION NAME PHYSICIST/DOSIMETRIST PHONE EMAIL RADIATION ONCOLOGIST PHONE (if different) EMAIL Dose per Fraction to Prescription Isodose Intended Number of Fractions Intended Dose to Prescription Point DOSE PRESCRIPTION Maximum Dose per Fraction in the Planning Target Volume Minimum Dose per Fraction in the Planning Target Volume Minimum Dose per Fraction in the Clinical Target Volume TREATMENT TECHNIQUE FIELD I FIELD II FIELD III FIELD IV Treatment Machine Treatment Planning System (manufacturer/model/ version) For this benchmark case: FIELD NAME (ANT, POST, RT LAT, etc.) ENERGY, MODALITY (e.g. 6X, 6e) SSD GANTRY / COLLIMATOR / COUCH ANGLE / / / / / / / / COLLIMATOR SETTING (W x L or if using independent jaws X 1, X 2, Y 1, Y 2 ) EQUIVALENT SQUARE AT SAD / SSD TMR, TAR, % DEPTH DOSE, etc. (type/value) DEPTH OF PRESCRIPTION POINT ATTENUATORS: Blocks or Multi-leaf collimators (MLC) (tray factor if applicable) Wedge (angle/factor) 0 Physical 0 Internal 0 Enhanced Dynamic 0 Virtual Compensator (factor, material, thickness) / Bolus (depth) DOSE PER FRACTION CT slice thickness: from target volume: Grid size used on axial slices for dose calc: Site Margin of aperture cm mm DVH Volume (cc) PTV Target Volume NT1 R Optic Nerve NT2 NT3 R Globe Pituitary MONITOR UNITS PER FRACTION 5

CTV = Red Optic Nerves = Blue & Green Pituitary = Pink Brainstem = Green Figure I: All axial CT images on which the CTV or any normal tissues (other than skin) are delineated. 6

Figure II: Reconstructed coronal slice through isocenter showing lateral and vertex beams, CTV (red outline) and normal tissues. A B Figure III: A. Reconstructed sagittal slice through isocenter with isodose contours superimposed. Show at least the 6420, 6000, 5800, 5500, 5000, and 3000 cgy contours. B. BEV of right lateral portal showing collimators, beam aperture, PTV, right globe, right optic nerve, pituitary and brain stem. 7

A B Figure IV A Reconstructed sagittal slice through isocenter with isodose contours superimposed. Show at least the 6420, 6000, 5800, 5500, 5000, and 3000 cgy contours B. BEV of vertex portal showing collimators, beam aperture, PTV, and all normal tissues except skin. Figure V: Axial CT slice at isocenter with CTV and isodose contours superimposed. Show at least the 6420, 6000, 5800, 5500, 5000, and 3000 cgy contours. 8

Figure VI: Axial CT slice at the level of the right optic nerve with the pituitary, globes, optic nerves and brain stem delineated and isodose contours superimposed. Show at least the 6420, 6000, 5800, 5500, 5000, and 3000 cgy contours. Figure VII: Right lateral DRR with PTV and beam aperture superimposed. (Include a linear scale.) 9

Figure VIII: AP DRR (include a linear scale.) Figure IX: Dose-volume histogram for the planning target volume. Note that this DVH does not satisfy the dose prescription defined in Section 5. 10

Figure X: Dose-volume histogram for the right optic nerve, right globe, pituitary, and brain stem. 11