Morgan Sindall. NW PSBP Dee Point Primary School. Environmental Noise Report. Job No: RPT Latest Revision: - Date: 1/10/2014

Similar documents
7 REPORT ON EXISTING NOISE CLIMATE

UNIVERSITY OF WALES TRINITY ST DAVID FACE

WYETH LABORATORIES SITE HUNTERCOMBE LANE SOUTH TAPLOW ENVIRONMENTAL NOISE SURVEY & ASSESSMENT REPORT 4390/ENS. 25 March 2011 Revision Number: 0

Project: COOK ISLAND CHRISTIAN CHURCH. Prepared for: Cook Island Christian Church 34 Dunbeath Crescent Kew Invercargill Attention: Tina Maine

Colin Cobbing ARM Acoustics

The Residence Inn Hotel at 2 nd and Mace

STAcoustics. Noise and Health: Tools for Assessing Night Noise Impact. Stephen Turner, MA, MSc, HonFIOA. Director Stephen Turner Acoustics Limited

proposed residential development at Moss Lane, Madeley, Staffordshire

Technical Annexes 6 Noise

IN THE MATTER of the Resource Management Act 1991

Regulatory Strategies for Managing Noise from Outdoor Music Concerts

PEER REVIEW NZDF ENGINE TESTING NOISE PROPOSAL

Noise at work risk assessment

Community Noise Fundamentals

Chapter 8. Appendices

Indoor Noise Annoyance Due to Transportation Noise

ARCHIVE. Scottish Health Technical Memorandum 2045 (Part 4 of 4) Audiology. Acoustics

Bavani Nadaraja*, Ramdzani Abdullah

Effects of Aircraft Noise on Student Learning

WHEN BB93 JUST ISN T GOOD ENOUGH - SCHOOL ACOUSTICS DESIGN FOR EXCELLENCE.

Acoustics. How glazing can help reduce noise entering the home

ProPG PLANNING &NOISE. Noise Events. New Residential Development. Dani Fiumicelli. Birmingham. 22nd June 2017

The Essex Study Optimised classroom acoustics for all

THE CONTROL OF NOISE AT WORK REGULATIONS Guidance for Pub and Bar Operators

TOPIC H: NOISE. Richmond State of the Environment 2001

To: Kris Markarian, City of Santa Clarita Job No

LAGUNITAS COUNTRY CLUB NOISE ASSESSMENT OF INDOOR AMPLIFIED EVENTS

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY ENERGY SUPPLY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Sound Attenuation and Test Strategies for Generator Set Installations

SURVEY OF NOISE ATTITUDES 2014

Model Safety Program

DUBLIN CITY COUNCIL AMBIENT SOUND MONITORING NETWORK Annual Report For 2012

Before taking field measurements, it is important to determine the type of information required. The person making the measurement must understand:

MAPPING ON INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL NOISE LEVELS

Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual

Experiment of low-noise road surfaces on the Paris ring-road

AMBIENT NOISE MEASUREMENTS AND GRANDSTAND NOISE SIMULATION MODEL EDGEWOOD HIGH SCHOOL GOODMAN ATHLETIC COMPLEX. for. Madison, Wisconsin.

Effects of floor impact noise on people annoyance and physiological responses

workplace includes, any land, premises, location, vessel or thing, at, in, upon, or near which, a worker is, in the course of employment.

EXPEDITE METHODOLOGY FOR ASSESSING NOISE LEVELS IN AN URBAN SCENARIO BASED ON A NEW PARAMETER: THE SIGNIFICANT MEASUREMENT STARTS (SMS)

Classroom Acoustics. Classroom Acoustics Slides 2005 [G ABP Sales Training CES Presentations Classroom Acoustics 2005]

Procedure Number 310 TVA Safety Procedure Page 1 of 6 Hearing Conservation Revision 0 January 6, 2003

This program is designed to prevent hearing loss for students, staff and employees while engaged in universitysponsored

Evaluation the Best Distance between Noise Generation and Receptor for A Noise Barrier Construction around an Expressway in Malaysia

The Safety and Health at Work Act 2005

European Wind Energy Association Oxford 12th December 2012

SAN MATEO COUNTY ANIMAL SHELTER CONSTRUCTION NOISE ASSESSMENT SAN MATEO COUNTY, CALIFORNIA

Hearing Conservation Program April 27, 2018

Darwin Marine Supply Base HSEQ Quality Management Plan

NOISE SURVEY. EQUIPMENT: Sound Level Meter Octave Band Analyzer Dosimeters Sound Calibrator Survey Sheets Tape measure SP 10

Supplement. Aircraft Noise Terminology & Metric

Safety Services Guidance. Occupational Noise

Health, Safety, Security and Environment

Craven Community College HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Syar Napa Quarry Expansion EIR

Noise generated by late-night establishments: a new monitoring and management tool

FACTORIES ACT (CHAPTER 104, SECTION 102 (1)) FACTORIES (NOISE) REGULATIONS

Issues in the measurement of sleep-related noise events in road traffic streams

Hearing Conservation Program

Issues and Answers. Doug Price Authorized FACE Instructor

Hearing Conservation Program Regulations and Recommendations Summary

East Carolina University

Hearing Conservation Program. Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053

Occupant experience of indoor soundscapes in university office spaces

APPENDIX D NOISE SCALES/MEASUREMENT DEFINITIONS

Amend the Warren Zoning Bylaw by adding a new Section 15, Medical Marijuana Treatment Center, as follows:

Noise and Fishing Vessels

Laborers. Construction Industry Noise Exposures. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences

3M Center for Hearing Conservation

Contents THINK ACOUSTICS FIRST NOT LAST WHO BENEFITS FROM IMPROVED ACOUSTICS?

CERTIFICATE OF COMPETENCE IN WORKPLACE NOISE RISK ASSESSMENT

NOAH Sound Equipment Guideline

Hearing Conservation Program. Southwestern Community College. Office of Human Resources

Hearing Conservation Program

Impact of the ambient sound level on the system's measurements CAPA

OIML R 122 Annex C RECOMMENDATION. Edition 1999 (E) ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION

Classroom Acoustics January 13, Aural Rehabilitation University of Mississippi. David S. Woolworth Oxford Acoustics

Measuring the Risk of Impulsive Noise at Work: One Practitioner s Tips

The Fruit Yard Project

Portable Noise Monitoring Report August 15 - October 11, 2013 Woodland Park Elementary School. Vancouver Airport Authority

MnROADS NGCS LITE Test Strip Evaluation

Health, Safety & Environment Technical Guideline

Hearing Protection COMFORT INNOVATION PERFORMANCE PROTECTION. Make the right choice

Certificate of Competence in Workplace Noise Risk Assessment (CCWPNRA):

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD

INTERNATIONAL MODULE SYLLABUS W503 NOISE MEASUREMENT AND ITS EFFECTS

Delaware State University

Appendix 44 Meadowbank and Whale Tail 2018 Noise Monitoring Program

10 Noise 10.1 MEASUREMENT OF NOISE

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Construction Industry Noise Exposures. Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences

Minimum Training Guidelines Surveillance Audiometry

Effects of sound masking on workers a case study in a landscaped office

Chapter 4 NOISE Adopted: May 7, 1996

Construction Industry Noise Exposures. Construction Industry Noise Exposures

HVL Test on CT Analyzer for OMICRON, Austria.

EU Noise Policy WG4 on Noise Mapping

Experimental studies on sleep disturbances due to railway and road traffic noise

Hearing Conservation Program

Acoustic Comfort of Schools in Tropical Humid Climate

Transcription:

Morgan Sindall NW PSBP Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Job No: 1010273 Doc No: 1010273-RPT-00001 Latest Revision: - Date: 1/10/2014 Cundall Johnston and Partners LLP 4th Floor Cathedral Court 15 Colmore Row Birmingham B3 2BH Tel +44 (0)121 262 2720 www.cundall.com

Project name Dee Point Primary School Job Number Report Name Environmental Noise Report 1010273 Document Revision History Revision Ref Issue Date Purpose of issue / description of revision Document Validation (latest issue) Revision - Issue Date 1/10/2014 Purpose of issue / description of revision / version Planning Report Prepared by Checked by Verified by Initials TN AJP AJP Signature Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 2 of 14

Contents Introduction... 4 Assessment criteria... 5 2.1 Acoustic Performance Standards for PSBP... 5 2.2 BS 4142: 1997... 5 Noise survey details... 6 3.1 Jacobs noise assessment... 6 3.2 Cundall noise assessment... 7 Noise impact on the school... 10 4.1 Glazing... 10 4.2 Ventilation... 10 4.3 External walls / Roof construction... 11 Limiting noise levels for services plant... 12 5.1 Nearest noise sensitive receptors... 12 5.2 Limiting noise levels... 12 Cundall measurement data... 14 6.1 Daytime Survey 11 th September 2014... 14 6.2 Night time Survey 18 th September 2014... 14 This report is the copyright of Cundall Johnston & Partners LLP. It has been prepared for the sole and confidential use of Morgan Sindall and cannot be reproduced in whole or in part or relied upon or used by any third party without the express written authorisation of Cundall Johnston & Partners LLP. If any third party whatsoever comes into possession of this report, they rely on it at their own risk and Cundall accepts no duty or responsibility (including in negligence) to any such third party. Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 3 of 14

Introduction Cundall has been commissioned by Morgan Sindall to carry out an acoustic assessment in relation to the proposed Dee Point Primary School in Chester, part of the North West PSBP batch. Proposals are to build a new, two storey primary school to replace the existing school which will be demolished as part of the works. The new school will be located within the same site boundary as the existing school, only it will be located on the playing fields, to the south of the existing school. The location of the site is off Blacon Point Road in Chester at the following address: Blacon Point Road, Blacon, Chester, CH1 5NF This site is generally bounded by residential areas, to the west, north and east. Blacon Point Road forms the northern site boundary. To the south is the A548, however the view is partially obscured by car sales garages. Noise surveys have been carried out on the site to determine the existing noise impact on the site and the background noise levels at night. The purpose of this report is to: document measured noise levels around the site; assess the predicted noise impact on the school and comment on glazing and ventilation; set limiting noise levels for services plant. Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 4 of 14

Assessment criteria The acoustic assessment in this report is based on the following documents: Acoustic Performance Standards for the Priority Schools Building Programme, v1.7; BS 4142: 1997 Method for Rating industrial noise affecting mixed residential and industrial areas. 2.1 Acoustic Performance Standards for PSBP Table 1 of the Acoustic Performance Standards for the PSBP sets out internal noise level criteria for each type of school space. Typically, Internal Ambient Noise Levels [IANL] for general classbases have a noise level criteria of 35 db LAeq,30mins, with practical classbases a higher IANL of 40 db LAeq,30mins. Where rooms are mechanically ventilated, the combined noise break-in and mechanical services noise must achieve the IANL criteria set out in Table 1. A natural ventilation system or mixed mode/hybrid system should not exceed the IANLs defined in Table 1 of the standard by more than 5 db. For example, the IANL criteria for a naturally ventilated standard classbase would be 40 dba, as opposed to 35 dba LAeq,30mins. Noise from mechanical parts of a mixed mode system, such as the NVHR units should meet the limits identified in Table 1 [i.e. no additional 5 db] of the PSBP. It is acceptable, and recommended that during unusually hot weather, a means is provided for the teacher to increase the air velocity in the room to improve comfort [Ref. Acoustic Performance Standards for PSBP, Section 2.1.4]. 2.2 BS 4142: 1997 This Report sets limiting noise levels for any new items of services plant. Best practice, based on the methodology set out in BS 4142, is for any new items of plant to be designed such that the rating 1 level on the nearest noise sensitive premises [typically adjacent residential dwellings] does not exceed 10 db below the existing background noise levels. In accordance with BS 4142, this approach gives a positive indication that complaints are unlikely [ref. BS 4142, Section 9]. 1 The Rating Level, as defined in BS 4142: 1997, is the specific noise level plus any adjustment for the characteristic features of the noise Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 5 of 14

Noise survey details Noise surveys have been carried out at the school to determine both the noise impact on the school, and to establish the existing background noise levels around the site. During attended noise surveys, the dominant noise source was considered to be road traffic on Sealand Road, to the south and west of the site. In addition, a number of aircraft were witnessed. 3.1 Jacobs noise assessment Initial noise surveys were carried out [by Jacobs] at the site on 23 rd April 2013. Noise levels were measured at two positions, as shown on the following Figure, between 09:00 and 15:00 hours. B A Figure 1 - Jacobs' measurement locations At the time of the Jacobs surveys and assessment, the precise location of the new school was unknown. It is also noted in the Jacobs notes that measurements were adversely affected by extraneous events, such as children playing in the play grounds. Activities within the school premises, including students within the building or in the playground are specifically to be excluded from calculations for the IANL [ref. Acoustic Performance Standards for the PSBP, Section 2.1.1]. Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 6 of 14

The following Table summarises the noise levels measured by Jacobs: Position Highest L Aeq,30mins A 58.1 B 51.2 Table 1 - Summary of Jacobs' measurement data It is noted that although the highest LAeq,30mins recorded was 58 dba, the average noise levels was only 52 dba. Based on the following graph, it can be seen that the highest measured noise levels coincide with lunchtime and afternoon outdoor activity periods. The following graph shows the change in noise level over a typical school day. 60 58 Jacobs' measured noise levels 56 Position A 54 Position B Sound Pressure Level, db L Aeq,30mins 52 50 48 46 44 42 40 09:00 09:30 10:00 10:30 11:00 11:30 12:00 12:30 13:00 13:30 14:00 14:30 15:00 Time Figure 2 - Typical daytime noise impact on the school 3.2 Cundall noise assessment Cundall have carried out short term monitoring in order to verify noise data. In addition, a night-time noise assessment has been carried out at the nearest noise sensitive premises, in order to establish the background noise level so that limiting noise levels for services plant can be set. Cundall carried out spot check noise measurements at the school on 9 th September 2014 [daytime] and 18 th September 2014 [night-time]. Measurements were carried out at three positions, as follows: Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 7 of 14

Position 1 was measured at a Position indicative of the noise impact on the southern façade of the new school; Position 2 was measured at a Position indicative of the northern façade of the new school; Position 3 was indicative of the nearest noise sensitive receptors, located off Tregele Close. The monitoring Positions are shown on the following image: 3 2 1 Figure 3 - Cundall measurement positions Measurements were carried out using a calibrated Norsonic 140 Class 1 sound level meter. The meter was calibrated prior to and immediately following measurements, with no significant drift noted. Copies of relevant calibration certification can be supplied upon request. The following Table summarises measurement data: Location / Period Highest L Aeq,30mins Lowest L A90,T Highest L Amax Position 1 [Daytime] 50.6 40.3 74.5 Position 2 [Daytime] 42.4 37.9 60.8 Position 3 [Night-time] N/A 29.1 N/A Table 2 - Summary of Cundall measurement data Based on the highest recorded 30 minute periods, it is noted that the Cundall and Jacobs data does not correlate well. However, as noted above, it is understood that the Jacobs data was adversely affected by outdoor student activities within the grounds. Taking Jacobs average LAeq,T of 52 dba over the daytime period [as opposed to the maximum] correlates very well with Cundall data. Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 8 of 14

Taking the noise data from both Jacobs and Cundall into consideration, it is considered that the highest noise impact on the school from external sources outside the school premises would be 55-56 dba. Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 9 of 14

Noise impact on the school As can be seen from Section 3 above, the site is subject to a relatively low noise impact. Calculations below for the attenuation requirements for glazing and ventilation have been based on a noise impact from external sources outside the school premises of 55-56 dba. 4.1 Glazing It is considered that for standard classbases that have an internal ambient noise level [IANL] requirement of 35 dba LAeq,T or greater, standard thermal double glazing will provide adequate sound insulation against external noise sources. A typical standard thermal double glazing configuration would be 4 mm pane / 16 mm air gap / 4 mm pane, which provides up to 25 db 2 Rw + Ctr sound reduction. It is recommended that any glazing to rooms with the more onerous IANL of no greater than 30 dba LAeq,T use a configuration such as 4 mm pane / 16 mm air gap / 4 mm, capable of 26 db 2 Rw + Ctr sound reduction. 4.2 Ventilation The ventilation strategy of Dee Point Primary School is to maximise the use of natural ventilation throughout the facility. Where a natural ventilation strategy is used, the upper limit for IANLs can be increased by up to 5 db, i.e. a standard classbase IANL would be 40 dba, instead of 35 dba LAeq,30mins. It is therefore considered that a naturally ventilated solution, utilising openable windows [providing up to 15 db attenuation] and standard Breathing Building units [that provide up to 26 db Dn,e,w] are acceptable where the external noise exposure is up to 56 dba LAeq,30mins. Any mechanical part of the ventilation strategy must comply with the IANL criteria, as set out in Table 1 of the Acoustic Performance Specification. 2 Ref. BS EN 12354-3:2000, Section B.2.1 Glazing Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 10 of 14

4.3 External walls / Roof construction 4.3.1 Noise break-in In order to ensure that external noise break-in is controlled, it is considered that the external wall and roof construction should provide a minimum sound reduction of at least 25 db Rw. This level of attenuation is achievable by means of most lightweight, masonry or concrete wall/roof constructions. 4.3.2 Rain impact noise Lightweight roofs and roof glazing will require suitable design so that they provide adequate control of rain noise such that the resultant reverberant sound pressure level in a space does not exceed 25 db above the appropriate IANL for the space. Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 11 of 14

Limiting noise levels for services plant In order to see that noise from new items of services plant does not increase the existing background noise levels, careful selection and positioning of plant should be considered. All new items of services plant should be designed and selected such that the rating level on the nearest noise sensitive premises [typically adjacent residential dwellings] does not exceed 10 db below the existing background noise levels. This is based on the methodology set out in BS 4142 and would be a positive indication that complaints are unlikely. 5.1 Nearest noise sensitive receptors The following Figure shows the nearest noise sensitive receptors to the school: Table 3 - Nearest noise sensitive receptors 5.2 Limiting noise levels The following Table summarises the existing background noise levels measured at the site, in addition to limiting noise levels for all new items of services plant, when measured at 1 m from the nearest noise sensitive receptor. Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 12 of 14

Period Existing background noise level, dba L A90,T Maximum sound pressure level [db L Aeq,T] when measured at 1 m from the nearest noise sensitive premises Daytime [07:00 to 23:00 hrs] 37.9 28 Night-time [23:00 to 07:00 hrs] 29.1 19 Table 4 - Limiting noise levels for services plant broad band data The following Tables show the octave band centre frequency [OBCF] data for measured existing noise levels and limiting noise levels. All values are in dba. DAYTIME - OBCF, Hz 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 Existing background noise level, dba LA90,T 46.3 39.1 32.2 30.9 34.0 28.7 19.8 Maximum sound pressure level when measured at 1 m from the nearest noise sensitive premises 36 29 22 21 24 19 10 Table 5 Daytime limiting noise levels for services plant - octave band data NIGHT TIME - OBCF, Hz 63 125 250 500 1000 2000 4000 Existing background noise level, dba LA90,T 38.7 30.3 27.2 27.7 24.3 14.7 14.6 Maximum sound pressure level when measured at 1 m from the nearest noise sensitive premises 29 20 17 18 14 5 5 Table 6 Night-time limiting noise levels for services plant - octave band data The above limits apply to all services plant running simultaneously. Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 13 of 14

Cundall measurement data 6.1 Daytime Survey 11 th September 2014 Time L Aeq,30mins L AFmax L 90,30mins Position 1 13:17 48.2 67.7 40.3 13:47 50.6 74.5 40.6 Position 2 14:35 42.4 60.8 37.9 6.2 Night time Survey 18 th September 2014 Time L Aeq,5mins L AFmax L 90,5min Position 3 01:30 35.8 65.0 29.1 01:35 33.4 43.4 30.7 01:40 32.8 39.5 30.5 01:45 33.1 38.0 30.6 01:50 32.1 40.4 30.5 01:55 31.8 38.1 29.9 Dee Point Primary School Environmental Noise Report Page 14 of 14