Feeding Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS) to Pigs

Similar documents
Corn By-Product Diversity and Feeding Value to Non-Ruminants

Section 2 Feed Management

Feeding DDGS to Livestock and Poultry. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Opportunities for Using DDGS in Livestock and Poultry Feeds in Canada. Dr. Jerry Shurson Dept. of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Keeping Control of Feed Costs in an Uncertain Market

Dr. Jerry Shurson. Department of Animal Science

Feeding Value of DDGS for Swine, Dairy, and Beef. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Feed and Alternative Uses for DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson and Dr. Sally Noll Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

What is ProPound Canola Meal?

The Impact of the Ethanol Industry on Pork Production

The Key to What Sells Distiller s Grains. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

New Technologies to Aid in Evaluation of Alternative Feedstuffs. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Swine News. Nutrifax Corn Distillers Dried Grains with solubles Use in Swine Rations

EFC-01 Fall Feeding Distiller Grains to Hogs. Ron Plain 1

Quality Characteristics and Nutritional Profiles of DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

What is ProPound Canola Meal?

Industry. Feeding Swine. Energy. US Per Capita Meat Consumption. Gain (Tissue accretion) Maintenance ME

Nutrient Analysis of Sorghum Dried Distillers Grains with Solubles from Ethanol Plants Located in the Western Plains Region 1

Regaining Competitiveness: Alternative Feedstuffs for Swine

The Use of Distiller s Grains By-products in Livestock and Poultry Diets. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

NUTRITIONAL MANAGEMENT OF GROW-FINISH PIGS: ENERGY

DDGS in Swine, Poultry, and Aquaculture Diets

Overview of Production and Nutrient Content of DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

DDGS: An Evolving Commodity. Dr. Jerry Shurson University of Minnesota

Dr. Juan Carlos Rodriguez-Lecompte FINAL REPORT. January 14, 2011

Differences in Quality Characteristics Among U.S. DDGS Sources. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

USE OF DDGS AS A FEED INGREDIENT ETHANOL AND DDGS OVERVIEW AN EVOLVING ETHANOL INDUSTRY

Summary of Distillers Grains Feeding Recommendations for Swine

Containing Feed Cost Using Biofuel Coproducts

NATIONAL RENDERERS ASSOCIATION, Inc.

Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science

Benefits and Limitations of Using DDGS in Swine Diets

Corn Steepwater/Liquor as a Feed Ingredient for Swine

What We ve Learned About Feeding Reduced-Oil DDGS to Pigs

Overview of Production, Nutrient Profile, Physical Characteristics, and Quality Assessment of New Generation DDGS

IMPACT OF PRE-SLAUGHTER WITHDRAWAL OF VITAMIN SUPPLEMENTS ON PIG PERFORMANCE AND MEAT QUALITY. conditions was not addressed in the present study.

Could Co-products Give Corn and Soybean Meal a Run for Your Money? Matt Oryschak and Eduardo Beltranena

CANADIAN EXPERIENCE WITH FEEDING DDGS

Quality Issues Related to DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Dept. of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Liquid By-Products to Pigs. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

SWINE DAY D. L. Goehring, M. D. Tokach, J. L. Nelssen, J. M. DeRouchey, R. D. Goodband, S. S. Dritz 3, and J. L. Usry 4

Summary Report 3/2/05. Guowu Xu, Mark Whitney, and Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Exercise 2 Feed Composition and Nutrient Requirements 20 Points

What is DDGS? How is new generation DDGS different from old generation DDGS?

Differences in Quality Characteristics Among U.S. DDGS Sources. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Benefits and Limitations of Using DDGS in Swine Diets. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Ingredient Cost Update

C. Feoli, J. D. Hancock, D. H. Kropf, S. Issa, T. L. Gugle, and S. D. Carter 1

EFFECTS OF DRIED DISTILLERS GRAINS WITH SOLUBLES ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE AND FAT QUALITY OF FINISHING PIGS 1

Introduction. Hypothesis

Exercise 6 Ration Formulation II Balance for Three or More Nutrients 20 Points

Denise Beaulieu, PhD and John Patience, PhD

G2355 Byproducts, Damaged Feeds, and Nontraditional Feed Sources fo...

hogs ALL SUNGLO HOG FEEDS CONTAIN:

Overview Part 2. Use of New Generation Corn DDGS in Feeds for Swine, Poultry, and Aquaculture. Why is there so much interest in feeding DDGS to swine?

FEEDING MANUAL Feed manual TOPIGS Finishers

Biofuels: Consequences for Feed Formulation

Nutrient digestibility in canola meal for broilers: Effects of oil extraction method and fractionation by air classification

Overview of the Ethanol Industry and Co-Products

Energy utilization of reduced oil-dried distillers grains with solubles (RO-DDGS) in swine

SWINE RESEARCH REPORT 41

COOPERATIVE EXTENSION UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, DAVIS

Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Iowa State University, Ames. 4

Quality and Nutritional Characteristics of Distiller s Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS)

Effective Practices In Sheep Production Series

Miranda N. Smit, Xun Zhou, José L. Landero, Malachy G. Young, and Eduardo Beltranena. Copyright Alberta Agriculture and Forestry

Effect of Extrusion on Nutrient Digestibility in Corn and Wheat DDGS for Broilers

Energy 01/02/2013. Jean NOBLET INRA 30/01/ Méthodes de prévision des valeurs nutritives des aliments pour le porc: contexte international

Feeding Value of DDGS for Swine. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Nutrient digestibility of 4 varieties of triticale compared to CPS wheat for broilers

True Metabolizable Energy and Amino Acid Digestibility of Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles

EFFECT OF CARBOHYDRASE USE AND SOAKING OF CEREALS ON THE GROWTH OF LIQUID-FED FINISHER PIGS

Prof Velmurugu Ravindran Massey University, New Zealand

Alternative Ingredients for Poultry Turkeys

Feeding DDGS to pigs: What is new? Hans H Stein. University of Illinois. Urbana

Use of Distiller s s Dried Grains plus Solubles in Poultry Feeding Trials at the University of Georgia. University of Georgia

The Benefits and Costs of Commodity Feeding

O. J. Rojas; H. H. Stein 2 Department of Animal Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana

The Value of Distiller s Dried Grains with Solubles in Swine Feeding Programs. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Reducing cost by optimizing feed formulation. Peadar Lawlor

The Effects of Wheat and Crystalline Amino Acids on Nursery and Finishing Pig Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics 1

Natural-Pork. Swine Feeding Program

Effect of Extrusion and Enzyme Supplementation on Nutrient Digestibility in Triticale DDGS for Broilers

Minimizing Feed Costs for Improved Profitability

Summary. Procedures. (Key Words: Sorghum, Distillers Grains, Waxy, Endosperm, Finishing Pigs.) Introduction

Research Sells DDGS. Dr. Jerry Shurson Department of Animal Science University of Minnesota

Effects of Xylanase in High-Co-Product Diets on Nutrient Digestibility in Finishing Pigs 1

BUSINESS MODEL. Ethanol Marketing. Risk Management POET. Biomass POET. Research. Co-Product Marketing Plant Management POET.

DDGS IN POULTRY DIETS DOES IT MAKE SENSE

The Impact of Feeding Corn DDGS and Phytase on Manure Phosphorus Management in Pork Production

Soybean Use Poultry FACT SHEET MEAL

August 22, 2017 M. D. Lindemann

Reminders... ETHANOL. The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly! Background. Current and Proposed Ethanol Plants. What are the Uses of the by-products

Coordinated by. Don Mahan The Ohio State University Columbus, OH 43210

New Generation DDGS: millennials or Z? Alvaro Garcia DVM PhD South Dakota State University Director of Agriculture and Natural Resources

Overview of Completed DDGS Swine Research

GrainCorp Feeds. Delivering you choice and flexibility

Nutritional and Feeding Strategies to Minimize Nutrient Losses in Livestock Manure

Fact Sheet. Feed Testing & Analysis for Beef Cattle

Feeding Corn Distiller's Co-Products to Beef Cattle

Transcription:

November 2011 Agdex 440/68-1 Feeding Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles () to Pigs Ethanol production from cereal grains results in a co-product that can be used to feed pigs to reduce feed costs. This co-product is called distillers dried grains with solubles (). What is? Distillers dried grains with solubles, or, is the main co-product of ethanol production. In North America, ethanol is produced primarily from cereal grains to blend with gasoline for automobiles. In the process of ethanol production (Figure 1), the sugars from starch in cereal grain are fermented by yeast to liquid ethanol, releasing carbon dioxide gas (CO 2 ). The remaining wetcake is distillers grains, to which the condensed solubles are added back at drying ending up with for feeding to livestock. Cereal grain yields about one-third ethanol, one-third CO 2, and one third. Figure 1. The process of ethanol production that yields as the main co-product for animal feeding. Nutrients in is a good source of dietary protein, fat, vitamins and minerals for livestock (Table 1). Because starch makes up about 70 per cent of the kernel weight of cereals, the fermentation process concentrates the remaining nutrients approximately three-fold. The protein, fat and phosphorus content in reflects the grain or blend of grains fermented. In Western Canada, wheat and wheat-corn blends are the predominant feedstocks, yielding with a high protein content (36 %). In comparison, corn imported from the midwest US or produced in Ontario has more than twice the fat content (10.5 %) of wheat, owing to the higher oil content in corn grain compared to wheat. Processing affects quality In addition to the nutrient variability due to the grain stock, other factors such as the ethanol plant design and processing conditions affect the nutrient content and quality of. The amount of condensed solubles added back to the distillers grains (Figure 1) varies among the processing plants and affects the protein, fat and mineral content of. In addition, prolonged or excessive heating during the drying process scorches the protein in, reducing the availability of amino acids, in particular lysine. Incomplete addition of solubles and scorching of were common occurrences in older ethanol plants, but these processing deficiencies are mostly a thing of the past. Modern ethanol plants produce a high quality product. However, some plants are now extracting the oil from corn, which reduces its dietary energy value, making it comparable to that of wheat (5%).

Table 1. Nutrient content (8 % moisture), standardized ileal digestibility (SID) of crude protein and amino acids, energy values and apparent total tract digestibility (ATTD) of gross energy and phosphorus for corn and wheat Nutrient, % Corn 1 Wheat 2 Digestibility, % Corn 1 Wheat 2,3 Protein 27.38 39.79 SID protein 72.80 73.00 Arg 1.14 1.56 SID Arg 81.10 88.86 Cys 0.52 0.69 SID Cys 72.50 84.90 His 0.71 0.75 SID His 77.10 86.12 Ile 1.00 1.31 SID Ile 75.30 87.55 Leu 3.11 2.45 SID Leu 83.50 89.78 Lys 0.76 0.86 Avail. Lys 0.67 0.70 SID Lys 60.60 71.72 Met 0.54 0.55 SID Met 81.80 88.74 Phe 1.32 1.60 SID Phe 80.80 90.26 Thr 1.04 1.09 SID Thr 70.40 80.58 Try 0.21 0.38 SID Try 69.60 87.62 Tyr 1.04 1.10 SID Tyr 80.90 89.13 Val 1.34 1.62 SID Val 74.40 86.25 Crude fat 10.48 4.69 Starch 7.30 3.86 GE, kcal/kg 5000 4676 Crude fibre 5.64 6.56 ATTD% GE 76.80 68.61 ADF 9.90 13.80 DE, cal/kg 3809 3392 NDF 25.30 39.10 ME, kcal/kg 3585 Ash 3.86 4.88 NE, Mcal/kg pigs 2.30 2.00 Calcium 0.04 0.18 NE, Mcal/kg sows 2.40 2.10 Phosphorus 0.61 0.83 ATTD% Phosp. 59.10 55.45 Maximum mycotoxin tolerances (ppm): aflatoxin 0.005, vomitoxin 3.0, fumonisin 0.02, zearalenone 0.10. Data provided as reference. The reader assumes responsibility for use and interpretation. 1 Stein, H. H. and G. C. Shurson. 2009. J. Anim. Sci. 87:1292-1303 2 Proximate data from http://www.ddgs.usask.ca/nutrientprofile. aspx 3 Amino acids data and digestibility coefficients from Beltranena, E. and R. T. Zijlstra 2008. Advances in Pig Production 19:263-273 Swine diets should be formulated on the basis of net energy (NE). Formulating on a digestible (DE) or a metabolizable (ME) energy basis does not account for the greater heat increment of feeding induced by high protein, high fibre feedstuffs like. If the heat loss is not accounted for, increasing dietary inclusions of these feedstuffs results in greater reductions in pig performance. Mycotoxins in Mycotoxins are produced by moulds stressed by weather variation and extremes or insect damage to crops in the field. Mycotoxins are not destroyed during fermentation, and like non-starch nutrients, they also concentrate three-fold in. Mould growth may continue to rob grain of nutrients in storage after harvest, resulting in contamination that is not evenly spread but localized to hot spots. The variation in the lab results of mycotoxin analysis is largely due to sampling errors (90 %). Therefore, producers should collect large samples (about 3 kg) and analyze as many as they can afford. It is better to analyze 50 samples by low cost, broad-scanning ELISA than 1 sample by the more costly, but precise high pressure liquid chromatography (HPLC). Feeding mycotoxin-contaminated grain or to pigs may cause a number of problems: feed refusal, weight loss, vomiting, unthriftiness, rough hair, abortions, red vulvas, etc. Instead, contaminated should be fed to beef cattle and poultry that are more tolerant to mycotoxins than pigs. Or, the can be diluted with uncontaminated grain before feeding to pigs. Mycotoxin contamination of is a sporadic problem rather than the norm, so it may not be worthwhile to miss out on feed cost savings. At times when mycotoxin incidence is high, producers may decide to exclude from rations for a few months. Ethanol plants do have screening procedures in place to monitor mycotoxin levels in incoming grain and outgoing. Obtaining Variation among lots requires nutritionists to routinely adjust nutrient values to match that received. Feed mill managers should discount, or even reject, loads that do not meet guarantees. Proper sampling, retention and analytical testing are necessary to compare newly arriving loads with historical nutrient and mycotoxin levels. A plant-specific procurement contract is recommended that includes minimums for protein, fat, ash, phosphorous and available lysine as well as maximums for moisture, ADF, NDF (or crude fibre), mycotoxins content, colour (dark indicates burnt) and syrup balls size. Lab testing pays back quickly when results exceed specifications, magnifying feed cost savings, and producers can decide among processing plants regarding product consistency over time. 2

Feeding to nursery pigs A step-up inclusion strategy by feeding phase is recommended for weaned pigs to allow them to progressively adapt to the flavour and fibre content of diets containing (Figure 2). The inclusion of should not exceed 5 per cent for the first week post-weaning. Dietary inclusion levels can progressively increase thereafter (e.g. 10 % the second week and 20 % the third week post-weaning). To maintain performance, restrict the dietary inclusion of wheat to 15 per cent or corn to 30 per cent in nursery diets for pigs up to 20 kg. effects on fat hardness The high proportion of unsaturated fatty acids in, in particular linoleic acid, softens pork fat. These fatty acids cause bacon slices to stick together and convey an oily appearance to high fat processed pork products like sausage (30 % fat), but not to lean products like ham (<15 % fat). Asian consumers prefer harder fat because fresh pork is often thin-sliced and boiled or grilled for traditional dishes. Therefore, for hogs fed high levels (30 to 40 %), the removal of from the diet (withdrawal) for 3 to 4 weeks before slaughter is necessary to restore pork fat hardness (Figure 3). Producers should implement a 2-week withdrawal period if feeding at 15 to 20 per cent of the diet. No dietary removal is necessary if feeding at 5 to 15 per cent of the diet through to market weight. Figure 2. Weaned pigs need to progressively adapt to feeding. Including in nursery diets may have gut health benefits. Results from one US study suggest that feeding corn may reduce the incidence and severity of lesions caused by a moderate ileitis outbreak in nursery age pigs. Feeding to grower-finisher pigs Common inclusions of in hog diets range from 7.5 to 15 per cent. The high fat content of corn (10.5 %) returns the most in feed cost savings when feeding high levels to growing pigs. Up to 30 per cent wheat or 40 per cent corn can be fed to hogs until weeks before slaughter weight. However, a removal strategy must be implemented to mitigate the effect on pork fat hardness and the reduction in carcass dressing percentage. Figure 3. Pork fat softness can be a marketing issue preventable by withdrawing from the finishing diet. Feeding corn softens pork fat more than wheat due to the former having more than twice the grain oil content. The effect on fat softness is compounded by feeding corn grain instead of wheat-barley-based diets. The dietary inclusion of has a greater effect on fat hardness in gilts than barrows because their carcasses are leaner than those of barrows. The withdrawal period for gilts should therefore begin 7 to 10 days sooner than for barrows. It is important for producers considering high dietary inclusions of to discuss the intended market for their pork with packers and implement a withdrawal strategy tailored to the type of (corn or wheat) and amount fed. Stressing hogs before slaughter or providing extended carcass chilling can increase the incidence of 3

pale, soft and exudative (PSE) pork from hogs fed. Slaughter plants should provide proper lariage conditions and implement blast-chilling of carcasses. effects on carcass dressing percentage Feeding reduces the carcass dressing percentage by 0.4 per cent-units for each 10 per cent increase in dietary inclusion. The high fibre content of increases gut fill and thickens the gut wall, reducing carcass weight at evisceration. To compensate for this reduction in dressing percentage, producers should completely withdraw from the finisher diet 2 to 3 weeks before slaughter in favour of a lower-fibre feedstuff. Feeding to replacement gilts, sows and boars Common inclusions of in sow diets range from 10 to 20 per cent (Figure 4). Gestation diets for gilts and sows can include as much as 30 per cent wheat or 40 per cent corn. Limit wheat to 20 per cent and corn to 30 per cent in lactation diets, and introduce progressively. Figure 4. Sow diets can include, but sows should adapt to the taste of. Feed refusal and wastage will be observed if sows are not accustomed to the taste of. Conservative dietary inclusions (5-15 %) are recommended for the first week after farrowing and wean-to-breeding period. Due to microbial fermentation in the hindgut, sows can derive slightly more energy from than young pigs (see NE values in Table 1). Avoid feeding mycotoxincontaminated to pregnant sows (risk of abortion) and boars (affects spermatogenesis). Feed cost savings The following tables illustrate the feed cost savings that can be achieved by dietary inclusions. Table 2. Feed cost savings by increasing dietary WHEAT inclusions by 10 % Ingredients, % 0% 10% 20% 30% For each 10% Wheat grain 67.53 61.82 56.13 50.44-5.7 Soybean meal 15.00 10.00 5.00-5.00 Wheat 10.00 20.00 30.00 10.00 Field pea 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 Tallow 0.60 1.20 1.80 0.60 Limestone 1.03 1.05 1.08 1.10 0.03 Phytase 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01-0.01 Salt 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 L-Lysine HCl 0.13 0.22 0.31 0.40 0.09 L-Threonine 0.06 0.07 0.07 0.07 Vitamin premix 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 TM premix 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 $/1000 kg 266.62 259.40 251.25 243.27 ($7.78) Provided per kg of diet NE, Mcal/kg 2.33 2.33 2.33 2.33 gsidlys/mcalne 3.81 3.81 3.81 3.81 SIDthr/SIDlys 0.67 0.67 0.67 0.67 SIDmet/SIDlys 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.34 SIDtry/SIDlys 0.22 0.21 0.21 0.20 Avail. Phos, % 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Central Alberta prices for September 10, 2011: wheat $200, SBM $424, $180, field pea $238, tallow $900, Lys. HCl $2670 per tonne Tables 2 and 3 present four grower diets, each formulated to the same dietary energy, lysine-to-energy ratio and available phosphorus content containing either wheat for central Alberta or corn for southern Manitoba. Each 10 per cent increase in inclusion reduced the feed cost by $7.80 or $6.70, respectively, largely through displacing soybean meal from the diet. The higher phosphorus content and availability in compared to grain eliminated the need to supplement phosphorus from inorganic sources and decreased pyhytase inclusion. Due to the higher oil content, increasing the corn level reduced tallow inclusions (Table 3). In contrast, 4

increasing the wheat level required the addition of tallow to the diets to equalize dietary energy values. The price of fluctuates relative to other feed commodities and according to freight cost (distance) from suppliers. In conclusion, feeding can reduce feed costs and increase producers profitability, but the savings in the cost of feed vary regularly in different parts of Canada. Table 3. Feed cost savings by increasing dietary CORN inclusions by 10 % Ingredients, % 0% 10% 20% 30% For each 10% Wheat grain 66.28 61.19 56.16 51.02-5.09 Soybean meal 15.00 10.00 5.00-5.00 Corn 10.00 20.00 30.00 10.00 Canola meal 15.00 15.00 15.00 15.00 Tallow 1.60 1.50 1.30 1.20-0.13 Limestone 0.88 0.95 1.05 1.15 0.09 Phytase 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.01-0.01 Salt 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 L-Lysine HCl 0.07 0.18 0.30 0.42 0.12 L-Threonine 0.03 0.05-0.02 Vitamin premix 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 TM premix 0.40 0.40 0.40 0.40 $/1000 kg 306.83 298.13 289.49 286.76 ($6.69) Provided per kg of diet NE, Mcal/kg 2.31 2.31 2.30 2.30 gsidlys/mcalne 3.80 3.80 3.80 3.80 SIDthr/SIDlys 0.70 0.67 0.67 0.67 SIDmet/SIDlys 0.35 0.35 0.35 0.35 SIDtry/SIDlys 0.25 0.23 0.20 0.19 Avail. Phos, % 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 Prepared by Eduardo Beltranena, PhD Alberta Agriculture and Rural Development Telephone (780) 427-4567 E-mail eduardo.beltranena@gov.ab.ca For more information, contact Alberta Ag-Info Centre Call toll free 310-FARM (3276) Website: www.agriculture.alberta.ca Southern Manitoba prices for September 10, 2011: wheat $250, SBM $408, $228, canola meal $268, tallow $900, Lys. HCl $2670 per tonne 11/11/200 5