ACCELEDENT CASE REPORT. S. Jay Bowman, DMD, MSD Kalamazoo Orthodontics Portage, MI

Similar documents
The management of impacted

Orthodontic Treatment Using The Dental VTO And MBT System

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Forsus Class II Correctors as an Effective and Efficient Form of Anchorage in Extraction Cases

The Tip-Edge appliance and

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion

eral Maxillary y Molar Distalization with Sliding Mechanics: Keles Slider

Case Report. profile relaxed relaxed smiling. How would you treat this malocclusion?

Checklist with summary points

Non Extraction philosophy: Distalization using Jone s Jig appliance- a case report

Skeletal Class III patients can be some of the CASE STUDY. By Jeffery Gerhardt, DDS. Acceptable Results Likely. Poor Results Likely. Fig.

Keeping all these knowledge in mind I will show you 3 cases treated with the Forsus appliance.

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

Gentle-Jumper- Non-compliance Class II corrector

clinical orthodontics article

Fixed Twin Blocks. Guidelines for case selection are similar to those for removable Twin Block appliances.

Treatment of Class II, Division 2 Malocclusion with Miniscrew Supported En-Masse Retraction: Is Deepbite Really an Obstacle for Extraction Treatment?

KJLO. A Sequential Approach for an Asymmetric Extraction Case in. Lingual Orthodontics. Case Report INTRODUCTION DIAGNOSIS

SmartForce Clinical Innovations

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTISTS

AlignEUSummit2015_PPT Template- GEN SESSION_

The Inman Aligner. The Inman Aligner,* a versatile removable

Crowding and protrusion treated by unusual extractions

MemRx Orthodontic Appliances

MOLAR DISTALIZATION WITH MODIFIED GRAZ IMPLANT SUPPORTED PENDULUM SPRINGS. A CASE REPORT.

Molar distalisation with skeletal anchorage

An estimated 25-30% of all orthodontic patients can benefit from maxillary

OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

EUROPEAN SOCIETY OF LINGUAL ORTHODONTICS

MBT System as the 3rd Generation Programmed and Preadjusted Appliance System (PPAS) by Masatada Koga, D.D.S., Ph.D

Case Report Unilateral Molar Distalization: A Nonextraction Therapy

You. Fix. Could. This? Treatment solutions for typical and atypical adult relapse. 78 SEPTEMBER 2017 // orthotown.com

Correction of Crowding using Conservative Treatment Approach

ORTHOdontics SLIDING MECHANICS

A New Fixed Interarch Device for Class II Correction

Mesial Step Class I or Class III Dependent upon extent of step seen clinically and patient s growth pattern Refer for early evaluation (by 8 years)

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with deep overbite

UNILATERAL UPPER MOLAR DISTALIZATION IN A SEVERE CASE OF CLASS II MALOCCLUSION. CASE PRESENTATION. 1*

Treatment of Class II non-extraction using the Bioprogressive method

Comprehensive Orthodontic Diagnosis Align upper and lower arches is not a treatment plan!

Indian Journal of Basic and Applied Medical Research; June 2014: Vol.-3, Issue- 3, P

ISW for the treatment of moderate crowding dentition with unilateral second molar impaction

Experience with Contemporary Tip-Edge plus Technique A Case Report.

Intraoral molar-distalization appliances that

From Plan B to Plan A : Using Forsus Class II Correctors as a Regular Mode of Treatment

A Novel Method of Altering the Buccal Segment Relationship

Invisalign technique in the treatment of adults with pre-restorative concerns

Mixed Dentition Treatment and Habits Therapy

Sliding mechanics in an extraction case treated with 3M Clarity ADVANCED Ceramic Brackets and the 3M MBT Appliance System.

Orthos Article Revisited: Practice Efficiency & Profitability

Clinical efficacy of Invisalign treatment with weekly aligner changes: Two case reports

The Tip-Edge Concept: Eliminating Unnecessary Anchorage Strain

Class II correction with Invisalign - Combo treatments. Carriere Distalizer.

Case Report: Long-Term Outcome of Class II Division 1 Malocclusion Treated with Rapid Palatal Expansion and Cervical Traction

A Modified Three-piece Base Arch for en masse Retraction and Intrusion in a Class II Division 1 Subdivision Case

Treatment planning of nonskeletal problems. in preadolescent children

Class II Correction using Combined Twin Block and Fixed Orthodontic Appliances: A Case Report

Flip-Lock HERBST Appliance COMFORT. CUSTOMIZATION. ADVANCED ENGINEERING.

Lingual correction of a complex Class III malocclusion: Esthetic treatment without sacrificing quality results.

ORTH easy. The Complete System for Cortical Anchorage. OrthoEasy Pins

Pendulum appliance: skeletal and dentoalveolar effects. A systematic review.

Molar anchorage loss has been shown to occur

Orthodontics. Anomalies

System Orthodontic Treatment Program By Dr. Richard McLaughlin, Dr. John Bennett and Dr. Hugo Trevisi

The following standards and procedures apply to the provision of orthodontic services for children in the Medicaid/NJ FamilyCare (NJFC) programs.

One of the most common orthodontic A COMPARISON OF TWO MAXILLARY MOLAR DISTALIZING APPLIANCES WITH THE DISTAL JET

The ASE Example Case Report 2010

6. Timing for orthodontic force

Class II Correction with Invisalign Molar rotation.

AAO Meeting Mutilated Dentition in Aging Population

INDICATIONS. Fixed Appliances are indicated when precise tooth movements are required

Concepts of occlusion Balanced occlusion. Monoplane occlusion. Lingualized occlusion. Figure (10-1)

Your Smile: Braces By Blalock

2007 JCO, Inc. May not be distributed without permission.

Extractions of first permanent molars in orthodontics: Treatment planning, technical considerations and two clinical case reports

TransForce 2. Arch Developer Appliances Clinical Cases. New Horizons In Orthodontics

Low-Force Mechanics Nonextraction. Estimated treatment time months (Actual 15 mos 1 week). Low-force mechanics.

ADOLESCENT TREATMENT. Thomas J. Cangialosi. Stella S. Efstratiadis. CHAPTER 18 Pages CLASS II DIVISION 1 WHY NOW?

CHILDREN S ORTHODONTICS

Angle Class II, division 2 malocclusion with severe overbite and pronounced discrepancy*

LEARN FROM A LEADER. Intensive, hands-on training that will prepare you to confidently fabricate the appliances you want.

Volume 22 No. 14 September Dentists, Federally Qualified Health Centers and Health Maintenance Organizations For Action

ORTHODONTICS Treatment of malocclusion Assist.Lec.Kasem A.Abeas University of Babylon Faculty of Dentistry 5 th stage

Nonextraction Treatment of Upper Canine Premolar Transposition in an Adult Patient

ORTHODONTIC INTERVENTION IN MIXED DENTITION: A BOON FOR PEDIATRIC PATIENTS

Mx1 to NA = 34 & 10 mm. Md1 to NB = 21 & 3 mm.

1/20/ For your answer to question #2, what do you think is the most likely cause of outcome deficiency?

Preventive Orthodontics

The 20/20 Molar Tube. Ronald M. Roncone, D.D.S., M.S.

The Modified Twin Block Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Division 2 Malocclusions

Crowded Class II Division 2 Malocclusion with Class I Molars Due to Blocked In Lower Second Premolars

#39 Ortho-Tain, Inc

The treatment of anterior tooth crowded case of upper jaw with dental transposition between canine and lateral incisor tooth by fixed appliance

SELF LIGATING BRACKETS. 1. Commercial name: EasyClip EasyClip+ Lotus Self-ligating single buccal tubes

Use of a Tip-Edge Stage-1 Wire to Enhance Vertical Control During Straight Wire Treatment: Two Case Reports

Space Closure Biomechanics Applied Using The MBT System Technique

3M Incognito Appliance System extraction case study.

The main challenge in using the natural dentition

Integrative Orthodontics with the Ribbon Arch By Larry W. White, D.D.S., M.S.D.

Transcription:

ACCELEDENT CASE REPORT S. Jay Bowman, DMD, MSD Kalamazoo Orthodontics Portage, MI

BASELINE - MARCH 2012 START 6 MM MINISCREWS

HORSESHOE JET - PURE SKELETAL ANCHORAGE NO ANCHORAGE LOSS POSSIBLE 1 2 6 mm screws; 240 gram springs Compress springs @ 4 Week Intervals 3 4 Super Class I Molars Mx Braces Added

4/10/2012-1 MONTHS 3/28/12 TREATMENT START - IMPRESSION FOR HORSESHOE JET MN BUTTERFLY SYSTEM PRE-ADJUSTED APPLIANCES PLACED 4/10/12 ACCELEDENT DELIVERED 4/10/12 INSERTION OF HORSESHOE JET AND MINISCREWS I m always astounded to hear that you can t put braces on lower anteriors with a deep overbite: you need a bite plane. What are lower brackets but also a bite plane? Patient had no broken braces during course of treatment. No upper braces during distalization - no contribution to anchorage - hygiene - esthetics 6 mm screws.016 Niti >.022 slot

5/18/2012-1.7 MONTHS ACCELEDENT COMPLIANCE WEEK: 4/7 (57%) MONTH: 22/30 (73%) Mn Irregularity Resolved - Aligned to 17x25 NITI @ 1.7 mos.

6/22/2012-3 MONTHS ACCELEDENT COMPLIANCE WEEK: 4/7 (57%) MONTH: 22/30 (73%) MX SPACES OPENING MN LEVELING START Mn 17x25 SS @ 3 mos.

8/16/2012-5 MONTHS ACCELEDENT COMPLIANCE WEEK: 5/7 (71%) MONTH: 18/30 (60%) Note: typical transposition of miniscrews relative to 2nd premolars START SUBJECTIVE: Could have called distalization "good enough", but wanted to ensure complete molar correction. NOTE: Mn Was Leveled to Accept 19X25 S.S. @ 4 mos. (7/30/12)

9/25/2012-6 MONTHS ACCELEDENT COMPLIANCE WEEK: 6/7 (85%) MONTH: 20.5/30 (68%) DISTALIZATION COMPLETE 168 DAYS 5.6 MO OF DISTALIZATION 6 MO IN TREATMENT START Mn19x25 SS - Horseshoe Jet Locked Mx Braces Next Visit

ACCELEDENT COMPLIANCE WEEK: 6/7 (85%) MONTH: 20.5/30 (68%) DISTALIZATION COMPLETE 168 DAYS 5.6 MO OF DISTALIZATION 6 MO IN TREATMENT START

ACCELEDENT COMPLIANCE WEEK: 6/7 (85%) MONTH: 20.5/30 (68%) DISTALIZATION COMPLETE 168 DAYS 5.6 MO OF DISTALIZATION 6 MO IN TREATMENT DISTALIZED

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS COMPARISONS AMONG VARIOUS DISTALIZING METHODS INVESTIGATOR APPLIANCE DISTALIZATION TIPPING MONTHS RATE TOTAL TX CHIU Distal Jet 3.4 3.8 10.5 0.32 28 (degrees) (mm/mo) (time) BURKHARDT Pendulum 6.5 32 CHIU Pendulum 6.1 10.7 7 0.87 31 CAPRIOGLIO Pendulum 5.2 9.7 8 0.65 27 CAPRIOGLIO Fast-Back 4.2 2.2 9 0.47 29 ESCOBAR TAD/Pendulum 6 11.3 7.8 0.77 KINZINGER TAD/Distal Jet 3.9 3 6.7 0.58 CALI Frog 2.6 4.4 7.5 0.34 34 CALI Distal Jet 3.6 4.7 7.3 0.5 27 BAUMGARTNER Distal Jet 30 BAUMGARTNER Horseshoe Jet 29 CASE REPORT Horseshoe/ AcceleDent 5 13 cantilever but no anchorage loss 5.6 0.9 16 Caution is warranted when comparing the results from an anecdotal case report

10/31/2012-7 MONTHS MAXILLARY SPACE CLOSURE/RETRACTION SUPPORTED BY MINISCREWS 7 MO MX BRACES PLACED START 7 Mo Mx Braces Placed

2/18/2012-10.5 MONTHS ACCELEDENT COMPLIANCE WEEK: 2/7 (28%) MONTH: 11/30 (36%) START Space Closed / Retraction Complete / 2nd Molars Banded Horseshoe Jet & Miniscrews Removed

4/10/2013-12.5 MONTHS ACCELEDENT COMPLIANCE WEEK: 4/7 (57%) MONTH: 20/30 (66%) DISTALIZATION COMPLETE 168 DAYS 5.6 MO OF DISTALIZATION 6 MO IN TREATMENT START Finishing & Detailing / Continued treatment for 3 more months. SUBJECTIVE: Could have called this "finished" but continued to ensure best results.

BRACES REMOVED & POSITIONER DELIVERED START: 3/28/12 FINISH: 7/19/13 Full-step Class II Division 1 Mild Crowding Significant Overjet 2nd Molars Erupted; 3rd Molars Present Significant Curve of Spee Chew Positioner 24/7 for for one week then retainer impressions Chew Positioner 2-3 hours in p.m. and wear to bed for one week

FINAL RECORD - JULY 2013 FINISH

Pre-treatment Post-treatment

PRE-TREATMENT PANORAMIC X-RAY POST-TREATMENT PANORAMIC X-RAY No root resorption noted or impaction of 3rd molars Favorable leveling & root paralleling 478 days 16 mo 16 visits