Academic Journal of Cancer Research 7 (3): 193-197, 2014 ISSN 1995-8943 IDOSI Publications, 2014 DOI: 10.5829/idosi.ajcr.2014.7.3.8563 Predictors of Quality of Life among Female Breast Cancer Survivors at Hospital Kepala Batas, Penang: A Pilot Study 1 2 Adamu Ahmad Rufa i, Aishah Knight Abd Sattar, 3 4 Sanjeev Chandra Joshi and Hassan Muhammad Yankuzo 1 School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia 2 Advanced Medical & Dental Institute, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Penang, Malaysia 3 Mahkota Medical Centre, Melaka, Malaysia 4 Department of Chemical Pathology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kelantan, Malaysia Abstract: Background and aim: Breast cancer survivors are increasing due to improvement in the diagnosis and treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and its correlates among female breast cancer survivors. Design: Cross sectional study. Setting: Hospital Kepala Batas, Penang. Sample: A random sample of female breast cancer survivors (n = 50) Materials and Methods: The subjects were interviewed by means of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3). Relationships between functional and symptom scales of HRQOL with age of the subjects and overall QOL scores were evaluated using Pearson s correlation analyses. Results: Data indicated that the mean functional scale scores were above average except role functioning. The mean symptom scale scores were below average and fatigue (39.4±24.5), pain (24.7±22.3) and financial difficulties (34.7±38.3) were the highest. Age had a weak relationship with cognitive functioning (p < 0.05) and an inverse relationship with all the symptom scale score, but diarrhea had a weak linear relationship that was significant. The overall QOL was significantly related to physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning and cognitive functioning (p < 0.05). It was also significantly but inversely related to fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea, insomnia and appetite loss. Conclusion: The overall QOL was found to be above average and only social functioning was not significantly correlated with the overall QOL. Key words: Breast Cancer Survivors Quality of Life Health-Related Quality of Life Cancer Quality of Life Predictors INTRODUCTION trend of diagnosis, breast cancer patients are the most frequent survivors in clinical practice due to the Breast cancer is the commonest cancer and the improvement in early diagnostic facilities and treatment second leading cause of cancer-related deaths (after lung modalities [4]. Unfortunately for many breast cancer cancer) in the women worldwide with estimated 1.4 million survivors (BCS) and their families, from the time of new cases and 459,000 deaths in the year 2013 [1, 2]. diagnosis through the balance of patients life, several In Malaysia breast cancer is also the main killer affecting issues related to their physical and psychosocial women mostly within the age of 40-49 years, with well-being have not been addressed comprehensively. estimated exposure risk of 1 out of every 20 women [3]. It is therefore imperative for medical and public health Breast cancer therefore constitutes a major public health professionals to continuously search for the unique burden to the society, healthcare providers and policy issues affecting the quality of life (QOL) of BCS and makers all over the world. However despite increasing devise alternative approaches of solving them in order to Corresponding Author: Adamu Ahmad Rufa i, School of Health Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Health Campus, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia. 193
help them to lead a long, productive and healthy life. It is recommended for use during routine clinic session to aid well-known that BCS are at higher risk for adverse late in the detection of physical and psychosocial problems, outcomes due to the long-term treatment effects that and to improve the delivery of care and QOL in cancer affect their physical, behavioral and functional roles in patients. The questionnaire comprises of three HRQOL different perspectives such as developing limited arm scales that measure functional performance (physical, range of motion, lymphoedema, impaired cognitive role, cognitive, emotional and social), symptom scales function, reduced cardiovascular function, muscle (e.g. fatigue, pain and nausea and vomiting) and a global weakness and atrophy, difficulty in sleeping, fatigue, health status of cancer patients. nausea, vomiting, pain and other symptoms that decreases QOL in BCS [5-8]. Ethical Issues and Clearance: The study was approved Assessment of health-related QOL (HRQOL) in BCS by the Ethical Committee of University Sains Malaysia is important as it provide standard criteria for (USM) and the Ethical & Medical Research Committee, evaluating the results of health care interventions. It Ministry of Health, Malaysia. The subjects were allows objective comparisons to be made between the mobilized through the attending physicians and staff experiences of BCS and what is obtainable in their healthy nurses. They were properly counseled on the nature and counterparts [9]. HRQOL assessment involves purpose of the study and a written informed consent was multidimensional approach that covers inter-relationship obtained from them for documentation and legal of physical, material, psychological, social and spiritual purposes. Privacy of the subjects was ensured during the domains of life [10]. However in developing countries interview and/or physical examination (where necessary) including Malaysia, very few studies have been throughout the study period. conducted on the assessment of HRQOL in BCS. Hence the aim of this study was to identify the predictors of Data Collection: The participants were selected by HRQOL among female BCS at Hospital Kepala Batas, simple random sampling from the hospital case records. Penang, in order to update their awareness on the Each Participant was contacted on individual basis while importance of maintaining productive and healthy lifestyle waiting for her follow-up appointment with the oncologist. post diagnosis and treatment. The EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaires were distributed to the subjects and the protocol of the study was again MATERIALS AND METHODS highlighted to them by a healthcare professional that was not directly involved with the patient s care. In addition Study Design: Cross sectional the researcher and a trained nurse were available at the hospital for any question/clarification by the participants. Setting: Hospital Kepala Batas, Penang, Malaysia Measures of each of the 3 HRQOL scales and their subscales were scored from 0-100. An average of 11 minutes Sample: A random sample of 50 female breast cancer was required to complete the questionnaire. The sociosurvivors (aged 33-74 yrs). Inclusion criteria include demographic data consist of only patient initials and age. absence of underlying psychiatric illness or a known serious medical condition and women that have Statistical Analysis: Data was analyzed using SPSS completed or were undertaking adjuvant treatment. BCS Version 16.0 (IBM Corp) and results were expressed as outside the above age range, those with other mean and standard deviation (SD). Computation of the malignancies besides breast cancer and those with known results was done according to the guidelines of EORTC underlying psychiatric illness were excluded from this QLQ group. The mean (SD) age, QOL score, functional study. and symptom scales scores were summarized. Pearson s correlation analyses were used to determine the Assessment Tool: Version 3 of the European Organization relationships between age and functional scores or for Research and Treatment of Cancer quality of life symptoms scores of the respondents and between QOL questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) was used for the data scores and functional or symptoms scores of the collection [11]. The questionnaire has been translated and respondents. Comparisons with p < 0.05 were considered validated from English to Malay language [12]. It has been to be statistically significant. 194
Table 1: Mean values of HRQOL performance scale among BCS at Hospital Kepala Batas Variables Mean SD Physical functioning 84.54 16.47 Role functioning 46.88 27.00 Emotional functioning 73.26 25.15 Cognitive functioning 80.90 20.91 Social functioning 81.60 23.38 Symptom scales & items Fatigue 39.35 24.47 Nausea and vomiting 15.28 22.50 Pain 24.65 22.28 Dyspnoea 12.50 20.19 Insomnia 21.53 31.88 Appetite loss 20.83 29.68 Constipation 18.75 29.90 Diarrhea 04.86 13.73 Global health status Overall QOL 68.75 22.77 Table 2: Relationship between age of BCS and variables of the functional and symptoms scales Variables r-value p-value Physical functioning -0.028 0.428 Role functioning 0.176 0.121 Emotional functioning 0.242 0.053 Cognitive functioning 0.361* 0.007 Social functioning 0.138 0.180 Symptom scales Fatigue -0.001 0.498 Nausea & Vomiting -0.183 0.112 Pain -0.037 0.405 Dyspnoea -0.039 0.398 Insomnia -0.157 0.149 Appetite loss -0.144 0.169 Constipation -0.156 0.151 Diarrhoea -0.309* 0.018 Financial difficulties -0.170 0.130 * indicates significant correlation; p < 0.05 Table 3: Relationship between overall QOL and the variables of functional and symptoms scales Variables r-value p-value Physical functioning 0.464* < 0.001 Role functioning 0.381* 0.004 Emotional functioning 0.404* 0.002 Cognitive functioning 0.358* 0.006 Social functioning 0.196 0.091 Symptom scales Fatigue -0.419* 0.002 Nausea & Vomiting -0.340* 0.009 Pain -0.593* <0.001 Dyspnoea -0.469* <0.001 Insomnia -0.340* 0.009 Appetite loss -0.310* 0.016 Constipation -0.232 0.056 Diarrhoea -0.222 0.065 Financial difficulties -0.173 0.120 * indicates significant correlation; p < 0.05 Academic J. Cancer Res., 7 (3): 193-197, 2014 RESULTS A total of 50 BCS (aged 33-74 yrs) with mean age of 50.3±9.6 yrs were enrolled in this study. Summary of the mean values for the 3 HRQOL scales (including subscales) of EORTC QLQ that measure functional performance, symptoms scale and global health status of BCS was shown in Table 1. Out of the five variables of functional performance scale, physical functioning appeared to have the highest score (84.5±16.5) while role functioning had the least score (46.9±27.0). Fatigue (39.4±24.5) and the concern about financial difficulties (34.7±38.3) were more significant variables of the symptoms scale of measurement compared to the Financial difficulties 34.72 38.26 experience of pain (24.7±22.3) or other clinical symptoms. Assessment of relationship between age of the participants and variables of the functional or symptoms scales indicated an inverse relationship in most of the variables except for the cognitive functioning and diarrhea that showed significant linear relationship with the age of respondents as depicted in Table 2. On the other hand, significant correlation (p < 0.05) was observed between the variables of functional and symptoms scales (Table 3) and overall QOL. Strength of linear relationship between overall QOL and the variables of functional scale (except social functioning) was found to be significantly increasing in the order of Physical Functioning > Emotional Functioning > Role Functioning > Cognitive Functioning as depicted in Table 3. However an inverse relationship was observed between overall QOL and the variables of symptom scales. The latter were significantly correlated in BCS with poor QOL, with the strength of relationship in order of pain > dyspnoea > fatigue > nausea and vomiting > appetite loss respectively. DISCUSSION This preliminary study was conducted to identify the correlates of HRQOL among selected BCS at Hospital Kepala Batas, Penang, Malaysia. The study used Malay version of the standard questionnaire of EORTC QLQ-C30 for data collection [12]. Components of the questionnaire include variables of functional performance scale and measures of the symptoms scale. Accordingly, a high mean score for any of the variables of functional scale or symptoms scale indicate better level of functioning or high rate of suffering from the symptoms respectively. Our data indicated better physical, emotional, cognitive and social functioning among BCS which corresponds 195
with similar findings of Jaiyesimi et al. [13] among female However further study that will incorporate demographic BCS in Nigeria. Although our report indicated better and lifestyle factors need to be carried out in a large social functioning among female BCS in Asia compared to sample. the report of Jaiyesimi et al. [13]. The disparity could be Thus we found QOL to be significantly related to ascribed to cultural differences such as the mode of physical functioning, emotional functioning, role dressing, partner relationships and body image concerns functioning and cognitive functioning in that order and of BCS in relation to age, social orientation and other similar results were reported in a previous study [18] environmental factors that limit full participation of women although the perception of QOL may change at a different into social responsibilities and other roles at home or rate than the functional capabilities. All the functional working places [14]. scale scores were significant correlates of QOL except It is established that BCS experience different social functioning. Symptoms that showed significant symptoms which varies in terms of nature and intensity correlation with QOL in this study were fatigue, nausea due to the psychosocial nature of breast cancer and and vomiting, pain, dyspnoea and insomnia. Further adverse effect of some of the drugs. Fatigue, pain, study to incorporate lifestyle factors should be carried out insomnia (difficulty in getting to sleep), loss of appetite, in larger sample. A comprehensive multidisciplinary team constipation and diarrhea were among the symptoms for cancer care where various professionals would being experienced in BCS [15]. Although high rate of contribute their expertise towards the management of fatigue has been recorded in this study, it appears to have cancer patients should be encouraged. less impact on physical performance probably due to adequate family support. This finding was supported by ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS the report of Brower et al. [16] on the association of fatigue and overall QOL in BCS. Similarly our data showed We thank the Ministry of Health Malaysia for less concern regarding financial difficulties among kindly giving us permission to publish this article. The majority of BCS possibly due to the Government financial authors would like to sincerely acknowledge the aid system where hospitals waiver significant part of the management of Hospital Kepala Batas for their treatment costs. The observation of good level of pain cooperation and the breast cancer patients that tolerance in this study varies with relative pain intensity voluntarily participated in this study. and pain perception among different races. Overall, the mean score of QOL obtained in this study was high and Competing Interests: The Authors declare that they have therefore consistent with the results of previous studies no competing interests. on the long-term disease free BCS [10, 14, 15]. Age has been reported to have effect on BCS in REFERENCES relation to the variables of functional or symptoms scales and to the overall HRQOL [17]. In this study however, age 1. Siegel, R., D. Naishadham and A. Jemal, 2013. Cancer does not represent a strong correlate of the function and statistics. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, quality of life among BCS that participated in this survey. 63(1): 11-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21166. This is in agreement with the report of McMillan (1998) 2. Soliman, A.A. and S.E. Anis, 2014. that showed low to moderately negative relationship Immunohistochemical expression of p12 in ductal between age and intensity of the symptoms. This implies carcinoma of the breast and its correlation with that as age advances in BCS, less symptoms intensity is HER2/neu expression and hormonal status. often experienced compared to what is obtainable in the Academic Journal of Cancer Research, 7(2): 98-102. younger counterparts. On the contrary, cognitive 3. Lim, G.C.C., S. Rampal and Y. Halimah, 2008. Cancer functioning showed significant direct relationship with Incidence in Peninsular Malaysia, 2003-2005: The age while physical functioning demonstrated weak and Third Report of the National Cancer Registry, inverse relationship. Malaysia, National Cancer Registry. Therefore in this study, specific domains of QOL 4. Berry, D.A., H. Stamford, W.B. Lawrence and among selected BCS have been investigated. The study M. Charles, 2005. Effect of screening and adjuvant was intended to serve as a basis for further exploration of therapy on mortality from breast cancer. New the impact of breast cancer on the QOL in women from England Journal of Medicine, 353: 1784-92. different backgrounds. The results of this study 5. Spiegel, D., 1997. Psychosocial aspects of breast demonstrated overall QOL of BCS to be above average. cancer treatment. Seminar Oncology, 23(S1): 5136-47. 196
6. Brennan, M.J., 1992. Lymphoedema following the 13. Jaiyesimi, A.O., E.A. Sofela and A.A. Rufa i, 2007. surgical treatment of breast cancer: a review of Health-related quality of life and it s determinants in pathophysiology and treatment. Journal of Pain Nigerian breast cancer patients. African Journal of Symptom Management, 7(2): 110-6. Medicine and Medical Sciences, 36: 259-65. 7. Brezden, C.B., K.A. Phillips, M. Abdollel, T. Bunston 14. Ganz, P.A., J.H. Rowland, K. Desmond, and I.F. Tannock, 2000. Cognitive function in breast B.E. Meyerowitz and G.E. Wyatt, 1998. Life after cancer patients receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. breast cancer: understanding women's health-related Journal of Clinical Oncology, 18(14): 2695-701. quality of life and sexual functioning. Journal of 8. Maryam, D.A.S., B. Zinnatossadat, H.S. Mohsen, Clinical Oncology, 16(2): 501-14. Z. Mahtab and S. Barat, 2011. Depression and health 15. Montazeri, A., 2008. Health-related quality of life in related quality of life in breast cancer patients. breast cancer patients: a bibliographic review of Academic Journal of Cancer Research, 4(2): 43-46. the literature from 1974 to 2007. Journal of 9. Felce, D. and J. Perry, 1995. Quality of life: Its Experimental & Clinical Cancer Research, definition and measurement. Research in 27(1): 32. doi: 10.1186/1756-9966-27-32. Developmental Disabilities, 16(1): 51-74. 16. Bower, J.E., P.A. Ganz, K.A. Desmond, J.H. Rowland, 10. Dorval, M., E. Maunsell, L. Deschenes, J. Brisson B.E. Meyerowitz and T.R. Berlin, 2000. Fatigue in and B. Masse, 1998. Long-term quality of life after breast cancer survivors: occurrence, correlates and breast cancer: comparison of 8-year survivors with impact on quality of life. Journal of Clinical population controls. Journal of Clinical Oncology, Oncology, 18(4): 743-53. 16(2): 487-92. 17. McMillan, S.C., 1989. The relationship between age 11. Aaronson, N.K., S. Ahmedzi, B. Bergman, and intensity of cancer-related symptoms. Oncology M. Bullinger, A. Cull, N.J. Duez, A. Filiberti, Nursing Forum, 16(2): 237-41. H. Fletchner, S.B. Fleishman, J.C.J.M. de Haes et al, 18. Peuckmann, V., O. Ekholm, N.K. Rasmussen, 1993. The European Organization for Research and S. Møller, M. Groenvold, P. Christiansen, J. Eriksen Treatment of Cancer QLQ C30: a quality of life and P. Sjøgren, 2007. Health-related quality of life in instrument for use in international clinical trials long-term breast cancer survivors: nationwide survey in oncology. Journal of National Cancer Institute, in Denmark. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment 85(5): 365-76. 104(1): 39-46. 12. Yusoff, N., W.Y. Low and C.H. Yip, 2010. The Malay version of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ C30): reliability and validity study. International Medical Journal of Malaysia, 9(2): 45-50. 197