EFFECT OF A SELF-LIMITED MONENSIN-CONTAINING ENERGY SUPPLEMENT AND SELENIUM BOLUS ON PERFORMANCE OF GROWING CATTLE GRAZING WHEAT PASTURE1

Similar documents
FURTHER DEVELOPMENT OF A MONENSIN-CONTAINING, SELF- LIMITED ENERGY SUPPLEMENT FOR WHEAT PASTURE STOCKER CATTLE

EFFECTS OF MONENSIN ON INTAKE OF A SELF-LIMITED ENERGY SUPPLEMENT FOR GROWING STEERS GRAZING WINTER WHEAT PASTURE

Effect of Increasing Levels of Monensin in an Energy Supplement for Cattle Grazing Winter Wheat Pasture

INTAKEANDDIGESTIBiliTY

SUPPLEMENTAL DEGRADABLE PROTEIN REQUIREMENT FOR CATTLE FED STOCKPILED BERMUDAGRASS FORAGE. Authors:

EFFECT OF A REVALOR-G IMPLANT AND SOURCE OF SUPPLEMENTAL PROTEIN ON WEIGHT GAIN OF STEERS WINTERED ON DORMANT TALLGRASS PRAIRIE OR OLD WORLD BLUESTEM

INTERACTION BETWEEN SUPPLEMENTAL PROTEIN AND ENERGY FOR LACTATING BEEF COWS GRAZING DORMANT NATIVE GRASS

Energy and Nitrogen Balance of Pigs Fed Four Corn Grains

SUPPLEMENTS FOR LIGHT WEIGHT CALVES RECEIVED AND GROWN ON NATIVE GRASS HAY. Story in Brief

Effect of the Frequency of Corn Supplementation on a High Quality Alfalfa Hay Utilization by Cattle

Effect of Feeding Wheat Straw or Sorghum-Sudan Hay on Gains and Wheat Forage Utilization of Stocker Cattle

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENT SOURCE ON INTAKE, DIGESTION AND RUMINAL KINETICS OF STEERS FED PRAIRIE HAY. Authors:

T.N. Bodine, H.T. Purvis II and D.A. Cox. Pages Animal Science Research Report

SUPPLEMENTAL PROTEIN REQUIREMENT FOR BEEF COWS GRAZING STOCKPILED BERMUDAGRASS. Authors:

Effects of L-Carnitine and Soybean Oil on Growth Performance in Weanling Pigs

MINERAL SUPPLEMENTS AND FEED ADDITIVES CAN THEY ELIMINATE FESCUE TOXICITY?

THE EFFECTS OF ENERGY AND PROTEIN SUPPLEMENTS ON SPRING-CALVING COWS

MOLASSES AND COTTONSEED MEAL SUPPLEMENTATION OF AMMONIATED HAY FOR YEARLING CATTLE

Ranchers Choice AN -18%

Effects of L-Carnitine in the Diet of Weanling Pigs II. Apparent Nutrient Digestibility, Whole Body Composition, and Tissue Accretion

Forage Intake of Range Cows as Mfected Breed and Level of Winter Supplement

Niacin for Growing Sheep and Steers

EFFECTS OF HEMICELL ADDITION TO NURSERY DIETS ON GROWTH PERFORMANCE OF WEANLING PIGS. Authors: Story in Brief

Free Choice Sheep Mineral

LYSINE REQUIREMENT OF PHASE 2 NURSERY PIGS FED KARL HARD RED WINTER WHEAT BASED DIETS

Supplementation for the Cow-Calf Calf Producer

How Do I Supplement My Livestock With Minerals? Part IV

Fermentation and Digestion of Formaldehyde Treated Ensiled High Moisture Corn Grain

Beef Cattle Handbook

Evaluation of Beta-Glucan and Antibiotics on Growth Performance and Carcass Traits of Weanling and Finishing Pigs

VitaFerm + Creep Feed = Easy Transition and Efficient Gain

Effects of L-Carnitine in the Diet of Weanling Pigs I. Growth Performance

T.B. Morillo, S.D. Carter, J.S. Park, and J.D. Schneider. Story in Brief. Introduction

Performance of Beef Calves Provided Molasses-Based Creep Supplements

EFFECTS OF SUPPLEMENTING PRAIRIE HAY WITH TWO LEVELS OF CORN AND FOUR LEVELS OF DEGRADABLE INTAKE PROTEIN. II. RUMINAL PARAMETERS OF STEERS.

Effects of Trace Mineral Source on Growth and Mineral Balance in Yearling Horses

EFFECT OF DIETARY CATION-ANION DIFFERENCE ON MINERAL BALANCE IN WEANLING HORSES. Authors:

Whey-Grown Yeast as a Protein Source for Baby Pigs

Key Words: Enzyme, Metabolizable Energy, Pigs

INCREASING PERFORMANCE OF GROWING CATTLE AFTER WEANING USING COTTONSEED AND COTTONSEED MEAL SUPPLEMENTS

FORAGE = BEEF (1) The researchers compared three diets for cows on dormant winter range: 1. Control (no supplement) 2. Corn Gluten Feed. 3.

Growing Calf and Show Steer Feed Management 1

Clif Little, Associate Professor/Extension Educator, Guernsey/Noble Counties Wayne Shriver, Manager, EARS & Staff

Guidelines for Feeding Broiler Litter to Beef Cattle

The Effects of Feeding MIN-AD and Sodium Bicarbonate on Early Lactation Performance of Dairy Cattle

Low Input Small Scale Feeding. John Dhuyvetter NCREC Feb 07

Stretching Limited Hay Supplies: Wet Cows Fed Low Quality Hay Jason Banta, Extension Beef Cattle Specialist Texas A&M AgriLife Extension

Mineral Supplementation of Grazing Beef Cows in Florida

Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle 1

Evaluating Feed Purchasing Options: Energy, Protein, and Mineral Supplements

Rumensin Levels for Finishing Steers Fed High Moisture Corn

THE INFLUENCE OF CORN SILAGE HYBRID VARIETY ON BEEF STEER GROWTH PERFORMANCE. Department of Animal and Poultry Science, University of Guelph

Rice bran in beef cattle fattening rations

Kiln Dust Trials. R. A. Zinn, D. R. Gill, F. N. Owens and K. B. Poling

McFleeg Feeds. McFleeg Feeds. The Brand Behind the Beef. The Brand Behind the Beef.

build RATION BUILDER Show Feeds Cattle your with

PRODUCT GUIDE. Beef. January

AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION FOR WHEY PROTEIN CONCENTRATE IN THE DIETS OF CONVENTIONALLY WEANED PIGS

The Effect of Varying Levels of Monensin in Finishing Rations for Beef Cattle

Effect of Heating of Soybean Meal on Milk Production and Degradation of Protein in the Rumen of Lactating Dairy Cows

Nutrition and Feeding For Show Calves

Effect of Energy Level and a Fibrolytic Enzyme on Performance and Health of Newly Received Shipping Stressed Calves

Product Purpose Statement for Commercial Feed Eli Miller University of Kentucky Lexington, KY May 15, 1997

Wheat Pasture Bloat of Stockers

Effects of Harvest Date and Late-Summer Fertilization Rate on Stockpiled Bermudagrass Forage Mineral Concentrations

Procedures in Feed Formulation

Use of Alaska Grown Whole Seed Canola in Dairy Cattle Diets Year 2

Feedlot Performance of Cattle Program Fed Supplemental Protein

Methods Tennessee Livestock Producers, Inc. (Tennessee Farm Bureau Federation, Columbia,

Effect of FuzZpellet on Feedlot Performance and Carcass Merit of Feedlot Cattle

Effects of Roughage Level and Fibrozyme TM Supplementation on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Finishing Beef Steers

Estimation of Total Tract Apparent Digestibility of Nutrients in Three Annual Winter Forages Using Two Different Digestibility Markers

THE EFFECT OF DIETARY CATION-ANION BALANCE ON MINERAL BALANCE IN THE ANAEROBICALLY EXERCISED HORSE

Effects of Processing Field Peas on Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Feedlot Heifers

104 Trop Anim Prod :2

Response of Ruminants to Protein Supplementation is Affected by Type of Low-quality Forage 1

R.B. HiCkS,1 D.R. Gil12 and F.N. Owens2

Reproductive efficiency Environment 120 Low P ( ) High P ( ) ays

Evaluation of Wet Distillers Grains for Finishing Cattle

Dairy Feed 14% - Textured

Conventional Versus High Concentrate Rations for Feeder Heifers and Steers

Developing a mineral program: combining the art and the science. Mary Drewnoski, Beef Systems Specialist, University of Nebraska-Lincoln

Feeding the Doe Herd. Lyle W. McNichol PAg. Lyle McNichol Livestock Consulting Services

Premixes for Growth and Development

DIET DIGESTIBILITY AND RUMEN TRAITS IN RESPONSE TO FEEDING WET CORN GLUTEN FEED AND A PELLET CONSISTING OF RAW SOYBEAN HULLS AND CORN STEEP LIQUOR

Beef Cattle Nutrient Requirements

CPT David J. Licciardello, DVM Veterinary Advisor

Dry Period. Medications: Additives: Pre-Fresh Period

Dry Period. Medications: Additives: Pre-Fresh Period

Summary. Introduction. Procedures. Swine Day 1998 EFFECTS OF PARTICLE SIZE AND MIXING TIME ON UNIFORMITY AND SEGREGATION IN PIG DIETS

Effects of Reduced Dietary CP and P on Nutrient Excretion of Finisher Pigs

Techniques to Reduce Free-Choice Liquid Supplement Consumption in Beef Cattle

M.J. Guthriel, D.G. Wagner2

GrainCorp Feeds. Delivering you choice and flexibility

Feeding Considerations for Byproduct Feeding

Beef Cattle Nutrient Requirements

Ohio State University Eastern Agriculture Research Station Belle Valley, Ohio Male vs Female Confinement Lamb Finishing

Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station Research Reports

NEED FOR RUMINALLY DEGRADED NITROGEN BY FINISHING CATTLE FED PROCESSED GRAINS Mike Brown West Texas A&M University Canyon, TX

R. O. Gottlob, J. M. DeRouchey, M. D. Tokach, R. D. Goodband, J. L. Nelssen, S. S. Dritz 2, C. W. Hastad, K. R. Lawrence, and D. A.

Transcription:

EFFECT OF A SELF-LIMITED MONENSIN-CONTAINING ENERGY SUPPLEMENT AND SELENIUM BOLUS ON PERFORMANCE OF GROWING CATTLE GRAZING WHEAT PASTURE1 P.A. Beck2, G. W. Horn3, M.D. Cravey2 and K.B. POling4 Story in Brief Seventy-six Brahman crossbred steers (mean initial weight of 594 Ib) were used in a 120-day trial to determine intake of a self-limited monensinlenergy supplement fed in the meal form, and the effect of the supplement and the Dura Se-120 bolus on performance of growing cattle grazing wheat pasture. Mean daily intake of the monensinlenergy supplement was limited to 2 Iblhead by cattle of two pastures. This was well within the target range of 2 to 3 lb. The selenium bolus tended to increase gains of nonsupplemented cattle but tended to decrease gains of cattle fed the monensinlenergy supplement. Therefore, the supplement by selenium interaction was significant The selenium bolus had no overall effect on performance. The monensinlenergy supplement increased daily gains by.45 Iblhead. This is similar to results found in past research with this supplement fed in the pelleted form in which daily gains were increased by about.50 lb. (Key Words: Monensin, Wheat Pasture, Growing Cattle, Selenium.) Introduction Wheat forage in the fall and early spring commonly contains crude protein (CP) levels in excess of 25% and digestible organic matter (energy) levels in excess of 75%. The energy:cp ratio is less than optimum for efficient microbial protein production as discussed by Hogan (1982). Monensin increases daily gains of growing cattle on wheat pasture (Horn et al., 1981) and IThis material is based upon work supported by the Cooperative State Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture, under Agreement No. 89-34198- 4288. Any opinions are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the view of the U.S. Department of Agriculture. 2Graduate Assistant 3professor 4Herd Manager 256 Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station

decreases the incidence and severity of bloat (Branine and Galyean. 1990; Grigsby, 1984; Bagley and Feazel, 1989). Horn et ai. (1990; 1992) found a self-limited monensinlenergy supplement fed in the fonn of 3/16 inch pellets increased daily gains by.53 and.48 Ib, respectively. Daily intake of the supplement was targeted at 2 to 3 Iblbead and cattle of one pasture in each trial consumed supplement within the desired range, but cattle of another pasture consumed greater than desired levels of supplement The objectives of this research were to measure intake of a selflimited monensinlenergy supplement fed in the meal fonn with a target level of daily intake of 2 to 3 Iblbead and determine the effect the monensinlenergy supplement and the Dura Se-120 bolus on perfonnance of wheat pasture stocker cattle. Experimental Procedures Seventy-six Brahman crossbred steers (mean initial weight 594 Ib) were randomly allotted to four groups of 18,20,22 and 16 head per group according to breed and initial weight. The steers were placed on four pastures of 2157 wheat pasture for a 120-day trial beginning November 7, 1991 and ending March 6, 1992. The trial was designed as a split-plot experiment with treatments, consisting of control (no energy supplement) or the self-limited monensinlenergy supplement assigned to pastures and one-half of the steers in each pasture was administered a selenium bolus. Blood samples were collected at 3 times during the trial from six cattle (3 non-bolused and 3 bolused) from each pasture and analyzed for whole blood selenium by Schering-Plough Animal Health Technical Services. The supplement consisted primarily of ground milo and wheat middlings (Table I), and contained 4.00% salt, magnesium oxide and Rumensin as intake limiters. The calculated monensin concentration was 75 mgllb. The supplement was fed in covered feeders with 20 feet of total bunk space in each pasture with intake measured twice weekly (i.e., at 3- and 4-day intervals). Cattle in control pastures were offered free-choice access to a commercial mineral mixture throughout the trial in weather vane type mineral feeders located near the water source in each pasture. Guaranteed analysis of the mineral mixture was: calcium, 15 to 17%; phosphorus, not less than 4%; salt, 18.5 to 21.5%; and magnesium, not less than 5.5%. Intake of the commercial mineral mixture was measured weekly. All cattle bad free-choice access to medium quality grass bay throughout the trial.. The cattle were weighed 3 times during the trial. All cattle weights were measured after 16 to 18. hour shrinks without feed and water. Estimated forage availability was measured before the trial and periodically throughout the trial, by hand clipping ten.5 square meter quadrats 1993.Animal Science Research Report 257

Table 1. Ingredient Composition of monensin/ energy supplement fed to catde on wheat pasture trial. % As-fed basis Ground milo, % Wheat middlings, % Sugarcane molasses, % Calcium carbonate, % Diealcium phosphate, % Magnesium oxide, % Salta, % Rumensin 60 Premix, % 62.78 20.99 4.80 4.00 2.55.75 4.00.125 Calculated nutrient content, as-fed basis NEgain, Meal/cwt Cru<le protein, % Calcium,% Phosphorus, % Magnesium, % 37.9 9.2 1.94 1.17.63 Monensin content, mg/lb 75 a rme mixing salt (99.5% NaCI). per pasture to ground level. Initial cattle numbers were allotted to pastures by equalizing available forage per steer in each pasture. The data were analyzed by least squares ANOVA using the GLM procedures of SAS. The performance trials were analyzed as a split-plot experimental design using pasture as the experimental unit and steers as the sampling unit. In the presence of a significant supplement x selenium interaction, standard errors for the split plot design were calculated to find the LSD and proper t-valuesfor comparison of two subunit means at different main units as described by Steel and Torrie (1980). Results and Discussion Mean daily supplement intake was limited to 2.0 ::i:.70 Iblhead in pasture one and 2.0 ::i:.77 in pasture 2, as shown in Table 2. The mean daily intake was within our targeted range of 2 to 3 Iblhead. and the daily intake ranged from.78 to 3.34 Iblhead in pasture 1 and from. 70 to 3.94 Iblhead in pasture 2. 258 Oklahoma Agricultural Experiment Station

Table 2. Supplement, monensin and mineral consumption by steers grazing wheat pasture. Standard Mean deviation Minimuma Maximuma Obs.b P~1 Supplement, lb/hd/day Monensin, mg/hd/ day 2.00.70.78 3.34 34 150 53 58 251 P~2 Supplement, lb/hd/day Monensin, mg/hd/day 2.00.77.70 3.94 34 150 58 52 296 Pasture 3 Mineral mixture, lb/hd/day.24.06.14.34 19 P~4 Mineral mixture, lb/hd/day.24.08.12 51 19 a Minimum or maximum for 3- or 4-day periods (pastures 1 and 2) or b weekly Number periods of observations. (pastures 3 and 4). Even though the ranges of intake were outside the targeted range, the supplement consumption was better limited by feeding the supplement in the meal form as compared to feeding a similar supplement in the pelleted form. Mean daily consumption of the commercial mineral mixture by control steers was.24 lblhead in each pasture. which is very close to the target level of intake (.25 lblday) for this mineral mixture. Performance of the cattle is shown in Tables 3 and 4. Problems with bloat were encountered during the trial and four steers that were observed to be frequently bloated were deleted from the data set due to poor performance. The 1993 Animal Science Research Report 259

N ~ == o:0:' ;' =- <= 3 = > 7CI :3.,., 5.. -c!. ~ ;.< 'C tii., S' tii =- C/) -=- Q' = Table 3. Effect of monensinlenergy supplement and selenium bolus on performance of steen grazing wbeat pasturea. Treatment Control SupDlement No selenium Selenium No Selenium Selenium (I) (2) (3) (4) Daily gain, Ib 2.22 2.40 2.86 2.67 Table 4. a Supplement by selenium interaction (P<.08). Comparisons I vs 2 3 vs4 1vs 3 2 vs4.16.13.10.20 Overall effect of tbe monensinlenergy supplement or selenium bolus on performance of steen grazing wbeat pasture. Treatment Control Energy Supplement NoBolus SeBolus Number steers 36 36 36 36 Initialweight,Ib 596 592 584 604 Finalweight,Ib 873 924 888 908 Dailygain, Ib 2.31 2.76 2.54 2.53 Observed silmificance level Supplement Selenium.15.80

supplement by selenium interaction was significant (p=.08). The selenium bolus tended to increase daily gains of control cattle (2.22 vs 2.40; P=.16), while the selenium bolus tended to decrease average daily gain in supplemented cattle (2.86 vs 2.67; P=.13). The interaction is due to the change of direction of the effect of the selenium bolus depending on the supplement treatment, yet we have no biological explanation for the interactions. Overall, the monensinlenergy supplement increased daily gain by.45 lb (2.31 vs 2.76 P<.15). In past trials (Horn et ai., 1990; Horn et ai., 1992) the monensinlenergy supplement increased daily gain of steers by.53 and.48 lb, respectively. Therefore the weight gain response to the monensinlenergy supplement has been very consistent from year to year. Supplement conversion, expressed as lb of supplementllb of added gain was 4.5 (2.0 lb of supplement divided by.45 lb added gain). The selenium bolus had no overall effect on performance of the steers (2.54 vs 2.53; P=.80) and whole blood selenium concentrations were not changed by the selenium bolus (p>.16). Literature Cited Bagley, C.P. and F.I. Feazel. 1989. Influence of a monensin rumina! bolus on the performance and bloat prevention of grazing steers. Nutr. Rep. Int. 40:707. Branine, M.E. and M.L. Galyean. 1990. Influence of grain and monensin supplementation on rumina! fermentation, intake, digesta kinetics and incidence and severity of bloat in steers grazing winter wheat pasture. 1. Anim. Sci. 68:1139. Grigsby, M.E. 1984. Effects of grain and monensin on daily gains and the incidence of bloat in steers grazing wheat pasture. Proc. West. Am. Soc. Anim. Sci. 35:309. Hogan, T.P. 1982. In: 1.B. Hacker (Ed). Nutrition Limits to Animal Production from Pastures. p 245. Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux. Farham House, UK. Horn, G.W., et ai. 1992. A self-fed monensin~dtaining energy supplement for stocker cattle grazing wheat pasture. Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. MP-136:301. Horn, G.W., et ai. 1990. Intake of a self-fed monensin~ntaining energy supplement by stocker cattle on wheat pasture and effects on performance. Okla. Agr. Exp. Sta. Res. Rep. MP-129:209. Horn, G.W., et ai. 1981. Effect of monensin on rumina! fermentation, forage intake and weight gains of wheat pasture stocker cattle. 1. Anim. Sci. 52:447. Steel, R.G.D. and J.H. Tome. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. A Biometrical Approach. p 381. McGraw-Hill Book Publishing. 1993 Animal Science Research Report 261