a) The date a loss of earnings has occurred, or b) The date of an audiogram which shows evidence of noise-induced hearing loss.

Similar documents
POLICY NUMBER: POL 09

Program Policy Background Paper: Noise Induced Hearing Loss

Noise Induced Hearing Loss: Final Program Policy Decision and Supporting Rationale

DECIDED BY: Marafioti; Shartal; Jago DATE: 20/02/98 ACT: WCA BOARD DIRECTIVES AND GUIDELINES: Operational Policy Manual, Document No.

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2275/15

Subject Noise-Induced Hearing Loss, On/After January 2, 1990

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1059/15

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1945/04

SUMMARY DECISION NO. 1018/97. Permanent impairment (degree of impairment) (hearing loss).

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

Section Prosthetic and Assistive Devices

This chapter provides guidance in assessing entitled permanent ear and hearing conditions.

Hearing Conservation Program April 27, 2018

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1343/06

POLICY NUMBER: POL 26

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL. Participant entitled to Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia (Board)

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 846/15

11. Hearing Conservation Program Chapter , WAC

Craven Community College HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

CCS Administrative Procedure H Hearing Conservation

SUNY Cortland Environmental Health and Safety Office Hearing Conservation Program

Occupational Health and Safety Act, 1993

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

A compensable claim for psychological injury can arise as an injury by itself with no physical injury or as a result of a physical injury.

Model Safety Program

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

HEARING CONSERVATION PURPOSE

Procedure Number 310 TVA Safety Procedure Page 1 of 6 Hearing Conservation Revision 0 January 6, 2003

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

Worker Hearing Loss Report

Santa Clarita Community College District HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM. Revised

Changes to Chronic Pain Policy Introduction

HEARING LOSS PREVENTION PROGRAM AND PROCEDURES

POLICY TRAINING HEARING PROTECTION. Noise Exposure

Health, Safety, Security and Environment

HEARING CONSERVATION PROCEDURE

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

(b) is as low as is reasonably practicable, where it is not reasonably practicable to meet the standard under clause (a).

Hearing Conservation Program. Southwestern Community College. Office of Human Resources

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program Regulations and Recommendations Summary

NOVA SCOTIA WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEALS TRIBUNAL

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1949/06

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

Workplace Health, Safety & Compensation Review Division

The Safety and Health at Work Act 2005

BEAUFORT COUNTY COMMUNITY COLLEGE OCCUPATIONAL NOISE

Final Progress Report

Hearing Conservation

Hearing Conservation Program

Procedure. Procedure

Workers Compensation Board of Nova Scotia. Chronic Pain: Causal Connection to Original Compensable Injury Consultation Summary. September 14, 2007

Environmental Health & Safety Policy Manual

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL

Your Company Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation

Hydro One Networks Inc. 483 Bay Street, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2P5. July 7, Attention: Consultation Secretariat

Tony Gray Head of Safety, Security and Resilience

WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL THE WORKER WORKERS COMPENSATION BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD ISLAND DECISION # 34

What s New? Example 2 Employee B. Example 1 - Employee A

San Diego Community College OSHA Standards

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Hearing Conservation Program

AS/NZS :2014. Occupational noise management AS/NZS :2014. Part 4: Auditory assessment. Australian/New Zealand Standard

NC Employees Workplace Program Requirements for Safety and Health. Hearing Conservation

MLC Title 4.3(C) Health and Safety (Noise)

Hearing Conservation Program

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 2649/16

Frederick Green v. Carr Lowery Glass Company, Inc., et al. No. 104, September Term, 2006.

Comparative Review of Occupational Health and Safety in Canadian Jurisdictions

(Bill No. 2) An Act to Amend the Workers Compensation Act (No. 2)

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM REVISED AS OF 12 JULY 2010

Contents. 1) Purpose ) Policy ) Definitions ) Procedure a) Requirements b) Noise standard... 4

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 1414/15

SECTION 1 - INTRODUCTION 2 PURPOSE 2 SCOPE 2 DEFINITIONS 2 LEGISLATIVE CONTEXT 3 RESPONSIBILITIES 4

Page104. Hearing Conservation Program

Short quiz at the end of the presentation

ISSUING AGENCY: Regulation and Licensing Department - NM Board of Osteopathic Medical Examiners.

Environmental Health and Safety. Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

Hearing Conservation Program

TAMPA ELECTRIC COMPANY ENERGY SUPPLY HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Texas Administrative Code

HEARING CONSERVATION CHECKLIST

Hearing Conservation Program. Santa Clara University 500 El Camino Real Santa Clara, CA 95053

Purpose: To provide a process to protect employees from hearing loss caused by excessive occupational exposure to noise.

Delaware State University

MANAGEMENT OF NOISE AT WORK

The Health Risks of Noise are Loud and Clear: Investigating the Public Health Significance of Occupational Noise-induced Hearing Loss

BEFORE THE ARKANSAS WORKERS' COMPENSATION COMMISSION CLAIM NO. F ALISHA MILLER CLAIMANT SOUTH ARK YOUTH SERVICES, INC.

Occupational Audiology What s In It For You?

DECISION OF THE WORKERS COMPENSATION APPEAL TRIBUNAL

Prepared By: Blake Smith/James Stubbs

HEARING CONSERVATION PROGRAM

Vision Painting Inc. Safety Management System

WORKPLACE SAFETY AND INSURANCE APPEALS TRIBUNAL DECISION NO. 742/14

Hearing Conservation Program

Transcription:

Section 40 Policy 44.20.50.20 Section Title: Benefits Administration Occupational Disease Subject: Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Effective Date: For Claims with a Date of Notification On or After October 1, 2013 GENERAL INFORMATION Permanent hearing loss can be caused either by a workplace event (trauma or a single exposure to occupational noise) or prolonged exposure to excessive noise. This policy applies to claims arising from long-term exposure to occupational noise that causes hearing loss. These claims are called noiseinduced hearing loss claims. If the WCB determines that the worker has suffered a permanent impairment arising from such exposure it is provided for in Schedule B, Impairment of Hearing, of Policy 44.90.10, Permanent Impairment Rating. Hearing-loss claims that are the result of trauma or a single exposure to occupational noise are adjudicated in the same manner as other workplace injuries, and, similarly, the determination of the worker's permanent impairment is provided for in Schedule B, Impairment of Hearing, of Policy 44.90.10, Permanent Impairment Rating. The allocation of costs that arise from previous employment(s), which are dealt with in this policy, do not apply. Appendix A includes a glossary of commonly used terms. A. POLICY 1. Noise induced hearing loss occurs gradually often over many years and most hearing-loss claims do not involve a loss of earnings. For these reasons, it can be difficult to determine when the impairment began. For the purposes of this policy, the date of accident will be: a) The date a loss of earnings has occurred, or b) The date of an audiogram which shows evidence of noise-induced hearing loss. The decision on establishing the date of accident is separate from the decision on whether there is a degree of impairment that warrants a permanent impairment award. Evidence sufficient for determining the date of accident may be insufficient for determining the degree of impairment. An audiogram used to determine the degree of impairment must be made by a certified audiologist. An audiogram used to determine the date of accident may be performed at a workplace and need not be performed by a certified audiologist. 2. Claims for long-term exposure to hazardous noise may be considered and paid on the basis of a worker's exposure with employers who are or had been registered with the Manitoba WCB.

WCB Policy 44.20.50.20, Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Page 2 3. Not all hearing loss is caused by exposure to noise at work. A claim for noise-induced hearing loss is accepted by the WCB when a worker was exposed to hazardous noise at work for a minimum of two years, based generally upon an average of 85 decibels for 8 hours of exposure on a daily basis. For every increase in noise level of 3 decibels, the required exposure time will be reduced by half. Section 4 dealing with tinnitus only applies to accidents on or after April 1, 2000. 4. Tinnitus is a perception of sound in the absence of an acoustic stimulus. It may be of a buzzing, ringing, rushing, whistling or hissing quality. It may be intermittent or continuous. The WCB may consider awarding an impairment award for tinnitus when secondary to noiseinduced occupational hearing loss and there is a history of 2 or more years of continuous tinnitus. An impairment rating is provided in accordance with Schedule B, Impairment of Hearing, of Policy 44.90.10. Assigning of Claim Costs 5. When the Employer of Record is a Class-E Employer, all claim costs are assigned to the Cost Apportionment Fund, with the following exception: When the worker had exposure to hazardous noise while previously employed with a Self- Insured Employer, the Self-Insured Employer is assigned its portion of the claim costs based upon the period of exposure. When the Employer of Record is a Self-Insured Employer, all claim costs are assigned to the Self-Insured Employer, with the following exceptions: Those costs that result from exposure to hazardous noise while previously employed with a Class-E Employer are assigned to the Cost Apportionment Fund. Those costs that result from exposure to hazardous noise while previously employed with another Self-Insured Employer(s) are assigned to the other Self-Insured Employer(s). 6. Workers who have had an established hearing loss prior to commencing employment in Manitoba will only be compensated for any increased impairment caused by exposure to hazardous noise in Manitoba workplaces with WCB Coverage. The Manitoba WCB supports the inclusion of noise-induced hearing loss in the interjurisdictional agreement, and will accept responsibility for that portion of hearing-loss claims resulting from out-of-province exposure when and if the inter-jurisdictional agreement is amended to include out-of-province exposure to noise.

WCB Policy 44.20.50.20, Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Page 3 7. When the WCB accepts a claim for noise-induced hearing loss and a specialist recommends the use of a hearing aid(s), a worker shall be entitled to a suitable hearing aid(s) of a reasonable cost as approved by the WCB under Policy 44.120 or 44.120.01, Medical Aid. 8. The application of cost relief or cost transfer involving other long-latency occupational diseases is set out in schedule E of policy 31.05.10, Cost Relief/Cost Transfer - Class E, and in schedule A of policy 31.05.15, Cost Transfer - Self Insured. B. REFERENCES The Workers Compensation Act, Sections or Subsections 1(1), 1(12), 4(1), 4(4), 4(9), 37, 38 60(2), 73(2) and 81(1)(c). The Workers Compensation Act, Section 105 (On or after January 1, 1992) WCB Policy 31.05.05 Rate-Setting Model for Class E Employers WCB Policy 31.05.10, Cost Relief/Cost Transfer Class E WCB Policy 31.05.15. Cost Transfer - Self Insured WCB Policy 44.90.10, Permanent Impairment Rating Schedule WCB Policy 44.120, Medical Aid WCB Police 44.120.01, Medical Aid History: 1. Noise-Induced Hearing Loss policy established on September 28, 1973. 2. Policy replaced by Board Order 81/85 on May 29, 1985, so that Manitoba employers would not bear the cost of non-manitoba exposure to noxious noise. 3. Policy re-write approved for issue to the Policy Manual by Board Order 9/91 on June 19, 1991. 4. Policy amended by Board Order 38/92 effective January 1, 1992, to remove the provision for pro-rating claims costs according to the period of exposure with each employer. Cost allocation where exposure with more than one employer incorporated into Policy 31.05.10, Cost Allocation. 5. Policy re-written to re-incorporate policy statements as approved by Board Order 81/85 (formerly separated as guidelines), and to better reflect amendment by Board Order 38/92. Clarification approved by Board Order 04/96 on January 23, 1996. 6. Policy revised by Board Order 06/00 effective for all claims arising from accidents on after April 1, 2000, to define the date of accidents for hearing-loss claims, and lower the minimum threshold for impairment awards and recognize tinnitus as a compensable condition when associated with occupational hearing loss. 7. Policy 44.90.10, Permanent Impairment Rating Schedule, was also amended by Board Order 6/2000 on February 22, 2000. Appendix A, Impairment of Hearing section of the policy applied to hearing loss claims arising from accidents on or after April 1, 2000. Former policy re-issued as 44.90.10.01.

WCB Policy 44.20.50.20, Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Page 4 8. Appendix A, Impairment of Hearing section of Policy 44.90.10, Impairment Rating Schedule was amended by Board Order 03/03, effective January 31, 2003 for hearing loss claims arising from accidents on or after April 1, 2000. Former policy re-issued as 44.90.10.01. Appendix A, Impairment of Hearing section of Policy 44.90.10.01 was repealed by Board Order 03/03 because the section provided incorrect impairment ratings for workers with significant hearing loss in one ear. Hearing loss claims adjudicated under Policy 44.90.10.10 were grandparented. 9. Policy revised by Board Order 46/08 effective November 27, 2008, to correct a wording error in the policy. The intent of the policy was to establish an impairment rating for tinnitus. Part A, Section 4 has been revised to indicate that claims for tinnitus are rateable if the tinnitus is associated with the noise-induced hearing loss rather than compensable as was previously indicated. 10. Minor formatting and grammatical changes were made to the policy June 27, 2012. 11. Policy revised by Board Order 19/13 on October 3, 2013, effective for claims with a date of notification on or after October 1, 2013. The policy change removes the cost of noiseinduced hearing loss claims from the cost records of Class E employers. 12. Policy updated November 10, 2017 to reflect Schedule E of the new policy 31.05.10, Cost Relief/Cost Transfer - Class E and Schedule A of policy 31.05.15, Cost Transfer - Self Insured, which provide for the relief and transfer of claim costs involving long-latency occupational disease claims. Reference section and Appendix A also updated to reflect changes associated with the new rate model. Changes were also made to reflect there are two Impairment Rating Schedules with Schedule B relating to hearing loss.

WCB Policy 44.20.50.20, Noise-Induced Hearing Loss Page 5 Appendix A - Glossary of Terms Class: Section 73 of The Workers Compensation Act (Act) groups employers into five broad classes (Classes A to E). Class-E Employers: Those employers who pay for the costs of the workers compensation system based on their payroll and claim costs experience. These employers are subject to the collective liability provisions of the Act. Cost Apportionment Fund: The fund designated in paragraph 81(1) (c) of the Act to cover the claim costs that are not entirely or directly assigned to Class-E Employers. Employer of Record: Under this policy, the Employer of Record is defined as the last employer in Manitoba with WCB coverage where the worker was exposed to hazardous noise. Self-Insured Employers: Employers in Classes A to D who are individually liable for the claim costs of their workers plus their share of administrative costs of the workers compensation system.