San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017

Similar documents
Lo Studio Geparsepto. Alessandra Fabi Oncologia Medica 1

Point of View on Early Triple Negative

Overview of nab-paclitaxel in Breast Cancer

Was gynäkologische OnkologInnen über Erblichkeit wissen sollten. 9. Brustkrebskongress Köln und Niederrhein 2016

GBG/AGO-B study groups

AGO e. V. in der DGGG e.v. sowie in der DKG e.v.

Review of adjuvant and neo-adjuvant abstracts from SABCS 2011 January 7 th 2012

Breast cancer treatment

The Role of Pathologic Complete Response (pcr) as a Surrogate Marker for Outcomes in Breast Cancer: Where Are We Now?

Trial record 1 of 1 for: Denosumab as an add-on Neoadjuvant Treatment (GeparX) (GeparX)

Locally Advanced Breast Cancer: Systemic and Local Therapy

Role of chemotherapy in BRCA and Triple negative breast cancer. Fernando Moreno Servicio de Oncología Médica Hospital Clinico San Carlos

Novel Preoperative Therapies for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Debu Tripathy, MD University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center

The Neoadjuvant Model as a Translational Tool for Drug and Biomarker Development in Breast Cancer

ADAPT: Her 2+/ HR - S. Kümmel Brustzentrum Kliniken Essen-Mitte

Cáncer de mama HER2+/RE+ vs HER2+/RE : Una misma enfermedad? Dra E. Ciruelos Departamento de Oncología Médica Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre

Triple Negative Breast cancer New treatment options arenowhere?

Neoadjuvant (Primary) Systemic Therapy

A view from the Oncology Clinic. Andrew Tu7 Consultant Clinical Oncologist

Definition and Impact of Pathologic Complete Response on Prognosis After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Various Intrinsic Breast Cancer Subtypes

What to do after pcr in different subtypes?

Breast : ASCO Abstracts for Review

ADAPT. Adjuvant Dynamic marker- Adjusted Personalized Therapy trial optimizing risk assessment and therapy response prediction in early breast cancer

XII Michelangelo Foundation Seminar

NeoadjuvantTreatment In BC When, How, Who?

Supplementary appendix

(Neo)Adjuvant Chemotherapy and biological Agents (essentials in HER2 and TN early breast cancer)

Hofmann et al. Hofmann et al. Trials 2013, 14:261

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy as a research model

Biomarkers for HER2-directed Therapies : Past Failures and Future Perspectives

Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Part 2 A Medical Update

Positive HER-2 tumor. How to incorporate the new drugs into neoadjuvance

Terapia sistemica neoadiuvante: in quali tumori? Quali risultati? Dott. Giacomo Pelizzari

Systemic Therapy of HER2-positive Breast Cancer

Lecture 5. Primary systemic therapy: clinical and biological endpoints

Clinical Research on PARP Inhibitors and Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)

Locoregional treatment Session Oral Abstract Presentation Saulo Brito Silva

In Honour of Dr. Neera Patel

Impact of BMI on pathologic complete response (pcr) following neo adjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for locally advanced breast cancer

Neo-adjuvant and adjuvant treatment for HER-2+ breast cancer

TNBC: What s new Déjà vu All Over Again? Lucy R. Langer, MD MSHS Compass Oncology - SABCS 2016 Review February 21, 2017

DR. BOMAN N. DHABHAR Consulting Oncologist Jaslok Hospital, Fortis Hospital Mulund, Wockhardt Hospital Mumbai & BND Onco Centre INDIA

Novel Preoperative Therapies for HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

Advanced HER2+ Breast Cancer: New Options and How to Deploy Them. José Baselga MD, PhD

Evolving Paradigms in HER2+ MBC: Strategies for Individualizing Therapy with Available Agents

Nadia Harbeck Breast Center University of Cologne, Germany

UK Interdisciplinary Breast Cancer Symposium. Should lobular phenotype be considered when deciding treatment? Michael J Kerin

Treatment of Early-Stage HER2+ Breast Cancer

Update on New Perspectives in Endocrine-Sensitive Breast Cancer. James R. Waisman, MD

Update on the Management of HER2+ Breast Cancer. Christian Jackisch, MD, PhD Sana Klinikum Offenbach Offenbach, Germany

Advances in Breast Cancer Therapeutics in the Adjuvant and Metastatic Settings. Eve Rodler, MD University of California at Davis October 2016

Oncotype DX testing in node-positive disease

Use of Taxanes in Older Breast Cancer Patients

original article introduction original article

Expanding Therapeutic Strategies for HER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

Updates From San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2017

Treatment of Early Stage HER2-positive Breast Cancer (One size does not fit all)

HER2-Targeted Rx. An Historical Perspective

Introduction. Approximately 20% of invasive breast cancers

PRO: Pathologic Complete Response Does Predict Outcome for Early Stage Breast Cancer Patients

ESMO Preceptorship Breast Cancer. Giuseppe Curigliano MD, PhD Breast Cancer Program Division of Early Drug Development Istituto Europeo di Oncologia

HER2-positive Breast Cancer

Triple negative breast cancer -neoadjuvant and adjuvant systemic therapy

Rethinking neoadjuvant therapy: neoadjuvant therapy as a platform for drug development in HER2 positive breast cancer

The next wave of successful drug therapy strategies in HER2-positive breast cancer. Hans Wildiers University Hospitals Leuven Belgium

(Neo) Adjuvant systemic therapy for HER-2+ EBC

Novel Chemotherapy Agents for Metastatic Breast Cancer. Joanne L. Blum, MD, PhD Baylor-Sammons Cancer Center Dallas, TX

EARLY BREAST CANCER, HER2-POSITIVE

Taking NeoadjuvantTreatment into the Clinic

Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Time to Slice and Dice? Carsten Denkert, MD Charité University Hospital Berlin, Germany

Systemic Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Trial record 1 of 1 for:

Update HER2. Rupert Bartsch. Department of Medicine 1, Clinical Division of Oncology Comprehensive Cancer Center Vienna Medical University of Vienna

10/15/2012. Inflammatory Breast Cancer vs. LABC: Different Biology yet Subtypes Exist

OPTIMIZING NONANTHRACYLINES FOR EARLY BREAST CANCER. Stephen E. Jones, M.D. US Oncology Research, McKesson Specialty Health The Woodlands, Tx

PROGNOSTICO DE PACIENTES COM CA DE MAMA METASTATICO HER2+: PODEMOS FAZER MAIS? TDM-1 AND BEYOND!

Xiaosong Chen 1, Guolin Ye 2, Chenfang Zhang 3, Xinzheng Li 4, Kunwei Shen 1. Original Article. Abstract

that the best available evidence has not demonstrated that pcr can predict long-term outcomes in the neoadjuvant setting.

The Expert Thoughts. Alessandra Fabi Oncologia Medica 1

Sustained benefits for women with HER2-positive early breast cancer JORGE MADRID BIG GOCCHI PROTOCOLO HERA

Rigshospitalet. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG. Neo-adjuverende medicinsk behandling. Bent Ejlertsen. 16 th ACTA ONCOLOGICA SYMPOSIUM

Any News in EBC? Ann H. Partridge, MD, MPH Dana-Farber Cancer Institute November 11, 2016

Systemtherapie des primären Mammakarzinoms

Early Stage Disease. Hope S. Rugo, MD Professor of Medicine Director Breast Oncology and Clinical Trials Education UCSF Comprehensive Cancer Center

Adjuvant chemotherapy in older breast cancer patients: how to decide?

Alternativas terapéuticas en fenotipo triple negativo Javier Cortes, Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal, Madrid

Non-Anthracycline Adjuvant Therapy: When to Use?

Breast Cancer: ASCO Poster Review

Systemic Therapy of HER2-positive Breast Cancer

The HERA Study Team. Presented by Ian E. Smith

Cancer du sein métastatique et amélioration de la survie Pr. X. Pivot

Postoperative Adjuvant Chemotherapies. Stefan Aebi Luzerner Kantonsspital

William J. Gradishar MD

Research Article Changes in Pathological Complete Response Rates after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Carcinoma over Five Years


What is new in HR+ Breast Cancer? Olivia Pagani Breast Unit and Institute of oncology of Southern Switzerland

Radiotherapy Management of Breast Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy. Julia White MD Professor, Radiation Oncology

Adjuvant Endocrine Therapy in Premenopausal Patients

Targeting the PI3 kinase mtor pathway in breast cancer. Dr Nicholas Turner. Madrid 2014

2014 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium Review

Transcription:

San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Survival analysis of the prospectively randomized phase III GeparSepto trial comparing neoadjuvant chemotherapy with weekly nab-paclitaxel with solvent-based paclitaxel followed by anthracycline/cyclophosphamide for patients with early breast cancer GBG69 Andreas Schneeweiss, Christian Jackisch, Sabine Schmatloch, Bahriye Aktas, Carsten Denkert, Christian Schem, Hermann Wiebringhaus, Sherko Kümmel, Kerstin Rhiem, Mathias Warm, Peter A. Fasching, Marianne Just, Claus Hanusch, John Hackmann, Jens Uwe Blohmer, Bernd Gerber, Jenny Furlanetto, Gunter von Minckwitz, Valentina Nekljudova, Sibylle Loibl, Michael Untch - A joint study of the AGO Breast and the German Breast Group -

Core biopsy (before study entry) Surgery Study Design San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 N = 1200 Arm A R 1:1 12 weeks 12 weeks Arm B STRATIFICATION FACTORS: HER2+/HR- vs. HER2+/HR+ vs. HER2-/HR- vs. HER2-/HR+ Ki67 ( 20% vs. >20%) SPARC (positive vs. negative) Paclitaxel 80 mg/m 2 weekly Nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m 2 weekly The dose was reduced to 125 mg/m 2 after recruitment of 464 patients Epirubicin 90 mg/m 2 Cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m 2 HER2 positive patients: Trastuzumab 8 mg/kg (loading dose) 6 mg/kg Pertuzumab 840 mg (loading dose) 420 mg Untch et al. Lancet Oncol 2016

Main Eligibility Criteria Unilateral or bilateral primary breast cancer Stages ct2 - ct4a-d ct1c and additional high risk cn+ or pn SLN+ or ER-neg and PR-neg or Ki67 > 20% or HER2-positive Central testing for HER2, HR, Ki67, and SPARC 1 1 Lindner J et al. Ann Oncol 2015

Study Endpoints San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 Primary endpoint: pcr rate (ypt0 ypn0) Secondary efficacy endpoints (overall and according to stratified subpopulations): disease-free survival (DFS) distant disease-free survival (DDFS) overall survival (OS)

Patient and tumor characteristics (baseline) Paclitaxel N=600 (%) Nab-paclitaxel N=606 (%) Overall N=1204 (%) Age (median, yrs ) 48 (22-76) 49 (21-75) 49 (21-76) Palpable tumor size (median, mm) 30 (5-150) 30 (4-150) 30 (4-150) ct3 / 4 (palpation) 86 (16.5) 81 (15.8) 167 (16.2) cn+ 265 (45.1) 275 (46.3) 540 (45.7) Ki67 >20% 415 (69.2) 418 (69.0) 833 (69.1) SPARC positive (IRS 6-12) 94 (15.7) 97 (16.0) 191 (15.9) Grade 3 338 (56.3) 319 (52.6) 657 (54.5) Breast cancer subtype TNBC 137 (22.8) 139 (22.9) 276 (22.9) HER2-negative / HR-positive 266 (44.3) 268 (44.2) 534 (44.3) HER2-positive / HR-positive 149 (24.8) 140 (23.1) 289 (24.0) HER2-positive / HR-negative 48 (8.0) 59 (9.7) 107 (8.9) Untch et al. Lancet Oncol 2016

Primary Endpoint: pcr (ypt0 ypn0) 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 29% Paclitaxel Δ pcr 9% p<0.001 38% Nab-paclitaxel N=600 N=606 The substitution of solvent-based paclitaxel (P) with nab-paclitaxel (np) as neoadjuvant chemotherapy significantly increased the pathological complete response rate (pcr; ypt0 ypn0) overall from 29% to 38% (p<0.001). The largest pcr improvement of absolute 22% (from 26% to 48%; p<0.001) was achieved in patients with TNBC. It has not yet been shown whether this will translate into an improved survival. Untch et al. Lancet Oncol 2016

Power Calculation San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 The analysis of DFS (and other time-to-event endpoints) was planned to be performed after 248 events had occurred. In this case the log-rank test would have 80% power to detect an improvement of the 5 year DFS from 75% to 81.8% (HR=0.70) with a 2- sided significance level of α=0.05. The cut-off date of this analysis was November 16 th 2017. At that time, 244 confirmed events were in the database with a median follow-up of 49 months (IQR 44.6-52.9).

Disease-Free Survival San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 3 yrs Δ 6.4% Log rank p=0.0044 P-EC 141/600 events np-ec 141/600 103/606 events + Censored np-ec 103/606 events + Censored Median follow-up of 49 months (IQR 44.6-52.9) HR (np-ec vs. P-EC) = 0.69 (95% CI 0.54-0.89) Number needed to treat (NNT; 3yrs) = 16 pts DFS rates (estimated): Time P-EC 95% CI, P-EC np-ec 95% CI, np-ec 3 yrs 80.7% (77.2-83.7) 87.1% (84.1-89.6) 4 yrs 76.2% (72.3-79.5) 83.5% (80.2-86.4)

Disease-Free Survival per Subtype TNBC HR+HER2-3yr 83.1% 4yr 78.7% 3yr 86.3% 4yr 80.8% 3yr 73.4% 4yr 68.6% 3yr 78.6% 4yr 72.8.0%

Forest Plot: Disease-Free Survival

Overall Survival: Overall HR (np-ec vs. P-EC) = 0.83 (95% CI 0.59-1.17) Log rank p=0.2968 P-EC 72/600 deaths np-ec 61/606 deaths + Censored OS rates (estimated): Time P-EC 95% CI, P-EC np-ec 95% CI, np-ec 3 yrs 91.1% (88.4-93.1) 92.3% (89.8-94.2) 4 yrs 87.0% (83.8-89.6) 89.6% (86.8-91.9) TNBC

Surrogate Value of pcr (exploratory analysis) Disease-Free Survival Overall Survival p=0.941 p=0.495 p=0.328 p=0.012 v v

Summary San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 GeparSepto demonstrates a significantly improved DFS when patients received nab-paclitaxel instead of paclitaxel (HR=0.69, 95% CI [0.54-0.89; log rank p=0.0044). A similar treatment effect was observed for patients with TNBC and HR+/HER2- tumors. The interaction with Ki67 suggests that nab-paclitaxel generates a long term benefit in particular in tumors with lower proliferation. Irrespective of the treatment group, patients achieving a pcr had a significantly better DFS. Patients without pcr have a significantly better DFS with nab-paclitaxel than paclitaxel.

Acknowledgements San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium, December 5-9, 2017 All patients and their families Study teams at the 69 GeparSepto sites Team at GBG Headquarters Team of Charité for central pathology GBG / AGO-B Steering Committee and the study chairs Celgene and Roche for financial and drug support Visit www.gbg.de for slide download