Integrated ADSL. PhUSE Nate Freimark/Thomas Clinch Theorem Clinical Research

Similar documents
OCCDS Creating flags or records. Rob Wartenhorst PhUSE Barcelona 2016

Analysis Datasets for Baseline Characteristics and Exposure Time for Multi-stage Clinical Trials

AE: An Essential Part of Safety Summary Table Creation. Rucha Landge, Inventiv International Pharma Services Pvt. Ltd.

Using CDISC Models for the Analysis of Safety Data

North Hennepin Community College. Sports & Recreation Rules and Regulations

BRL /RSD-101C0F/1/CPMS-716. Report Synopsis

Measuring association in contingency tables

Frequency Tables Aspects to Consider / PhUSE - Industry Starters / Katja Glaß

Examples: Tables. Descriptive stats with ANOVA, ANCOVA, and t test p values Frequency and percent Correlation coefficients

PROGRAMMER S SAFETY KIT: Important Points to Remember While Programming or Validating Safety Tables

Standards for Analyzable Submission Datasets for Directed Safety Analyses

ADaM Considerations and Content in the TA User Guides. Susan J Kenny, PhD Maximum Likelihood, Inc.

Measuring association in contingency tables

BRL /RSD-101RLL/1/CPMS-716. Report Synopsis

CDISC BrCa TAUG & Oncology Information Session

Clinical Study Synopsis

Statistical Analysis Plan RH01649 Version Document Identifier Effective Date eldo_clinical_doc Reason For Issue

BRL /RSD-101C0D/1/CPMS-704. Report Synopsis

PFIZER INC. Study Initiation Date and Primary Completion or Completion Dates: 11 November 1998 to 17 September 1999

SYNOPSIS. Publications No publications at the time of writing this report.

Graph Display of Patient Profile Using SAS

2.0 Synopsis. ABT-711 M Clinical Study Report R&D/06/573. (For National Authority Use Only) to Part of Dossier: Volume:

Types of Studies. There are three main types of studies. These are ways to collect data.

Immediate-release Hydrocodone/Acetaminophen M Abbreviated Clinical Study Report R&D/08/1020

decisions based on ethics. In the case provided, the recreational therapist is faced with a

Two-sample Categorical data: Measuring association

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome/Efficacy Variable:

PFIZER INC. These results are supplied for informational purposes only. Prescribing decisions should be made based on the approved package insert.

A SAS sy Study of ediary Data

Study Centers: This study was conducted in 2 centers in Italy.

Final Clinical Study Report. to the Dossier SYNOPSIS. Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI463110

The Standard for the Exchange of Nonclinical Data (SEND): History, Basics, and Comparisons with Clinical Data

XP23829 PHASE 2 PSORIASIS TRIAL PRELIMINARY TOPLINE DATA PRESENTATION SEPTEMBER 15, 2015 COPYRIGHT 2015 XENOPORT, INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.

ADaM Grouping: Groups, Categories, and Criteria. Which Way Should I Go?

Pharmaceutical Applications

Leveraging Standards for Effective Visualization of Early Efficacy in Clinical Trial Oncology Studies

2.0 Synopsis. ABT-711 M Clinical Study Report R&D/06/054. (For National Authority Use Only) Referring to Part of Dossier: Volume: Page:

ABT-358 (Paricalcitol) M Clinical Study Report R&D/08/333

SYNOPSIS. Issue Date: 25 Oct 2011

Upstream with your statistician and a data visualisation paddle

TEST-TAKER PROCESS. Create an account Schedule an exam Connecting to the proctor.

Chapter 19. Confidence Intervals for Proportions. Copyright 2010 Pearson Education, Inc.

6.5 Enteral Nutrition: Other Formulas: ß Hydroxyl Methyl Butyrate (HMB) May 2015

netw rks Guided Reading Activity Psychological Research Methods and Statistics Lesson 1 What Is Research?

GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY George W. Woodruff School of Mechanical Engineering ME Creative Decisions and Design Summer 2011

The RoB 2.0 tool (individually randomized, cross-over trials)

Statistical Analysis Plan

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

Clinical Study Synopsis

Summary ID#7029. Clinical Study Summary: Study F1D-MC-HGKQ

PharmaSUG Paper DS04

GSK Medicine: Study Number: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment:

SYNOPSIS. ER OROS Paliperidone: Clinical Study Report R SCH-301

Your solution to medical uncertainty members.bestdoctors.com

Summary ID# Clinical Study Summary: Study B4Z-JE-LYBC

1. To review research methods and the principles of experimental design that are typically used in an experiment.

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report AI Addendum #1. Open-label Dosing Phase

STELARA (ustekinumab) Clinical Study Report CNTO1275CRD3001

SAMPLING ERROI~ IN THE INTEGRATED sysrem FOR SURVEY ANALYSIS (ISSA)

Lilly. Disposable Insulin Delivery Device User Manual

A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 Study of the Safety and Analgesic Efficacy of MNK-795 Controlled-Release

Summary ID# Clinical Study Summary: Study B4Z-MC-LYCL

Chapter 19. Confidence Intervals for Proportions. Copyright 2010, 2007, 2004 Pearson Education, Inc.

POPULATION PHARMACOKINETICS RAYMOND MILLER, D.Sc. Daiichi Sankyo Pharma Development

Chapter 1 Data Types and Data Collection. Brian Habing Department of Statistics University of South Carolina. Outline

Unit 1 Exploring and Understanding Data

PFIZER INC. THERAPEUTIC AREA AND FDA APPROVED INDICATIONS: See USPI.

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report CN138002: Addendum 1. Individual Study Table Referring to the Dossier

Clinical Trial Results Database Page 1

A French, multicentre, placebo-controlled, randomised, double-blind,

Contents. Version 1.0: 01/02/2010 Protocol# ISRCTN Page 1 of 7

Improving Informed Consent to Clinical Research. Charles W. Lidz Ph.D.

Summary ID# Clinical Study Summary: Study B4Z-MC-LYBX

Adalimumab M Clinical Study Report Final R&D/16/0603

INDIVIDUAL STUDY TABLE REFERRING TO PART OF THE DOSSIER Volume: Page:

Study Center(s): The study was conducted at 39 study sites in Japan.

Subliminal Messages: How Do They Work?

Kick It Old School - Creating Reports with the DATA _NULL_ Step

Lesson Plan. Class Policies. Designed Experiments. Observational Studies. Weighted Averages

Synopsis (C0524T12 GO LIVE)

PFIZER INC. PROTOCOL TITLE: Efficacy and Safety of the Authentic Recombinant Human Somatropin Genotropin in Children with Familial Short Stature

What s it all about? Welcome. Why get involved?

TEST-TAKER PROCESS. Create an account Schedule an exam Proctored appointment.

APR-DRG and the Trauma Registry. Jodi Hackworth, MPH Johanna Askegard-Giesmann, MD Thomas Rouse, MD Brian Benneyworth, MD, MS

Step-by-Step Guide to Using Salesforce ( to Request an Interpreter

Scoring: WEll-being and Satisfaction of CAREgivers of Children with Diabetes Questionnaire (WE-CARE)

The clinical trial information provided in this public disclosure synopsis is supplied for informational purposes only.

PFIZER INC. GENERIC DRUG NAME and/or COMPOUND NUMBER: 5% Spironolactone Cream/ PF

Sponsor / Company: sanofi-aventis and Proctor & Gamble Drug substance(s): Risedronate (HMR4003)

Possible causes of difference among regions How to look at the results from MRCT Non-compliance with GCP and/or protocol Apparent Differences (Play of

Individual Study Table Referring to Part of the Dossier. Volume:

Paper number: CC02 MACRO %NEWFLOW JIAN HUA (DANIEL) HUANG, FOREST LABORATORIES INC, NJ

Clinical Trial Synopsis TL-OPI-518, NCT#

YOUR SOLUTION TO MEDICAL UNCERTAINTY members.bestdoctors.com

YOUR SOLUTION TO MEDICAL UNCERTAINTY members.bestdoctors.com

Ohio SNAP-Ed Adult & Teen Programs Eat a Rainbow of Snacks

Study No.: Title: Rationale: Phase: Study Period: Study Design: Centres: Indication: Treatment: Objectives: Primary Outcome:

Imputing Dose Levels for Adverse Events

Transcription:

Integrated ADSL PhUSE 2012-10-17 Nate Freimark/Thomas Clinch Theorem Clinical Research

ADSL - Not Without Challenges Where to Begin Source Data One ADSL or Two Number of Records per Subject Update or Create New Variables Treatment and Recalculated Variables Page 2 17Oct12

Which End Is Up? Start at the beginning Gather what was done Determine if ADaM recreation is desired on a study level Good luck integrating everything J Start at the end Determine ISS/ISE analysis needs Make sure study level ADaM are properly populated Page 3 17Oct12

What is the Basis? Source Data Study SDTM Integrated SDTM Study ADaM Page 4 17Oct12

Study Level SDTM Values needed for integration may not be available Events that cross studies are not combined VISIT/TPT/TESTCD values are inconsistent Traceability can be difficult especially when looking across studies Page 5 17Oct12

Integrated SDTM Requires an extra level of dataset creation Requires harmonization of SDTM variables VISIT/VISITNUM TPT/TPTNUM TEST/TESTCD Allows for putting data from multiple studies into one data section Demographics not collected in roll-over studies AE end dates captured in subsequent studies Will directly support integrated ADaM Page 6 17Oct12

Study Level ADaM Requires 100% preplanning Requires creation of variables that may not be relevant on a study level Allows for derived values to be used in ADSL calculations Did subject take a prohibited medication (captured in study ADCM) Page 7 17Oct12

How Many ADSL? Multiple ISS Generally more straight forward Typically includes all studies with subgroups focused on Disposition, Exposure, Laboratory, and AE groupings ISE Typically a focused set of studies with many more variables and subgroups Single ISS/ISE Are the same rules used for both? Safety vs. ITT Dosing date vs. randomization date Lots of flag variables not populated for all non ISE datasets Page 8 17Oct12

How Many Records Per Subject? One Record Per Subject Redefine TRTSDT/TRTEDT if a subject is in more than one study Much traceability gets lost in the transition One Record Per Subject Per Studyid Leave study values as-is TRTSDT/TRTEDT not useful for slotting Subject basically treated as multiple unless summary programs do the dancing (not one proc-away!!) One Record Per Subject Per Experience Double-blind -> open label Placebo washout -> double-blind Titration -> steady state Page 9 17Oct12

Decision Based On? Analysis needs Will the same subject s data be summarized across studies? How do I decide which AGE value to summarize? Will cross-study data be harmonized on an SDTM level? Page 10 17Oct12

ADSL Variable Values Traceability considerations Change in place vs. creating new variables Page 11 17Oct12

Update or Create? Update Existing Variables Original value and source gets lost AGE recalculated based on a different anchor date Create New Variables Original values maintained New variables do not exist in the current standard Programs have to be modified for new variables Page 12 17Oct12

Update or Create - AGE Study 1 based on randomization date Study 2 based on enrollment date Study 3 based on first dose date ISS requires AGE based on first dose date Create AGENEW with consistent formula? Create AGE with consistent formula? Save original AGE as AGEOLD for traceability? Do we care about the original study value? Page 13 17Oct12

Treatment Variables ISS Low vs. High vs. Placebo Study 1- High vs. Placebo Built with the end in mind: TRT01PN = 1 vs. 3 Breaks functionality of having TRTxxPN define column order Study level: TRT01PN = 1 vs. 2 Requires recoding on an integrated level Study 2 High vs. Low vs. Placebo TRT01PN = 1 vs. 2 vs. 3 Page 14 17Oct12

Treatment Variables (cont.) Study 1: 30 mg vs. 60 mg :TRT01PN = 1 vs. 2 Study 2: 20 mg Fed vs. 20 mg Fasted :TRT01PN = 1 vs. 2 Study 3: 20 mg :TRT01PN = 1 How does this get harmonized on an integrated level? Create new treatment grouping variables? Recreate TRTxxP based on integrated analysis needs? How do you handle subjects who get treated with multiple drugs if they are in the denominator for more than one column? Page 15 17Oct12

Grouping Variables </> median value requires recalculation Active vs. placebo can have different meaning on an ISS level vs. study level Dose groupings differ for integration Page 16 17Oct12

Recalculated Variables (example 1) Study 1 baseline is the average of Screening and Day 1 values Study 2 baseline is nominal Day 1 value ISS needs harmonized definition last nonmissing value prior to dosing Page 17 17Oct12

Recalculated Variables (example 2) Study 1 randomized trial - average daily dose based on titration period and then steady state dosing Study 2 open label study - average daily dose based on dosing log ISS requires recalculation looking across both studies Page 18 17Oct12

Other Considerations Are two studies considered two periods? If study ADaM used are integrated ADSL treatment period variables needed at all? May not be needed for TRTP/TRTA assignment since those are calculated on a study level Having all data on one record allows reviewers to calculate their own values without going back to the individual studies Page 19 17Oct12

Summary Decide where to start Gather all source data Structure (number of ADSL/obs) Update/Create New Variables Recalculate Necessary Variables Traceability and Period Page 20 17Oct12

Questions? Nate Freimark nate.freimark@theoremclinical.com Thomas Clinch thomas.clinch@theoremclinical.com Page 21 17Oct12