COVERA Vascular Covered Stents in the Management of Dysfunctional AV Access

Similar documents
Proven Performance Through Innovative Design *

COVERA Vascular Covered Stents Innovation in AV Access

COVERA covered stent to treat stenosis in arteriovenous fistula: 6-month results from the prospective, multi-center, randomized AVeNEW study

LUTONIX AV Clinical Trial

Lutonix AV Clinical Trial

Lutonix AV Clinical Trial

Prospective, randomized controlled study of paclitaxel-coated versus plain balloon angioplasty for the treatment of failing dialysis access

Lutonix in AV fistula and Early look AV IDE trial data

Role of Covered Stents and Drug Eluting Balloons In Dialysis Access

IN.PACT AV Access IDE Study Full Baseline Data. Robert Lookstein, MD MHCDL New York, NY On Behalf of the IN.PACT AV ACCESS Investigators

All arteriovenous access circuits, whether native vein

*PTA Failure: Recoil >30% stenosis or more than 2 PTA s within 3 mo. Bart Dolmatch, MD

Lutonix AV Clinical Trial

Jimmy Wei Hwa Tan, Surg, MD

Current Status of DCB Experience with Non- Femoropopliteal Applications (Dialysis, Tibial, Venous)

First experience with DCB for treatment of dialysis access stenosis The Greek experience

Cephalic Arch Stenosis: A unique entity

Few occlusive problems in arteriovenous access

DCB in the treatment of av-accessa single center prospective study

Bare Metal Stents vs Stent Grafts

Finally, the Control You Need to Deliver Accurate Treatment

Regardless of whether you are a vascular surgeon,

4/29/2012. Management of Central Vein Stenoses. Central Venous Stenoses and Occlusions

Qizhuang Jin. Renal Division, Department of Medicine, Peking University First Hospital, Peking University Institute of Nephrology, Beijing, China

Disclosures. Consultant/Independent Contractor: B Braun, Teleflex, MedComp, Cook, Bard, WL Gore Royalty: Cook, Teleflex

Angioplasty remains the most common method

Introduction to the Native Arteriovenous Fistula: A primer for medical students and radiology residents

CIRCUIT OPTIMIZING THE VASCULAR ACCESS. Bringing long-term value to AV access creation and intervention. Sponsored by Gore & Associates.

Technical Aspects for Treating AV Dialysis Fistulae with the IN.PACT DCB. Andrew Holden Auckland Hospital Auckland, New Zealand

IN ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA FAILURE

Recurrent lesions in AV access & Initial DCB experience in India

ENDOVASCULAR TREATMENT OF MALFUNCTIONING HAEMODIALYSIS GRAFTS/FISTULAS. Dr R Uberoi Interventional Radiologist John Radcliffe hospital Oxford.

Interventions for AV-Shunt stenosis: What works best PTA, Stent or DCB?

CATHETER REDUCTION. Angelo N. Makris, M.D. Medical Director Chicago Access Care

The Role of LUTONIX 035 DCB in AV Fistula Dysfunction Management in our Practice

Juxta-anastomotic stenoses: angioplasty or surgery (or when/why should we wait)?

The recent United States Renal Data System

Salvaging prosthetic dialysis fistulas with stents: Forearm versus upper arm grafts

What s on the Horizon in Dialysis Access? Libby Watch, MD, FACS Miami Cardiac & Vascular Institute

Since the initiation of hemodialysis, multiple inventions

ASDIN 9th Annual Scientific Meeting

Mechanical thrombectomy in acute thrombosis of dialysis fistulas: a multi-center study

Percutaneous and Surgical Treatments

AV Access Technology and Innovation DEVICES CHANGING HOW WE THINK ABOUT VASCULAR ACCESS

Surgical Options in Thrombectomy for Non-Surgeons

Why Can't I Cannulate This Fistula? Fistula Immaturity: The Simple But Critical Steps for a Functioning (Mature) AVF

Clinical Study Endovascular Stent Placement for Hemodialysis Arteriovenous Access Stenosis

The Art of Angioplasty

Balloon Expandable Covered Stents. Suddenly a Crowded Space

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

IVUS Guided Case Review Case Performed by Frank R. Arko III, MD Charlotte, NC

Konstantinos Katsanos, MSc, MD, PhD, EBIR

The HeRO Graft. Shawn M. Gage, PA Division of Vascular Surgery Duke University Medical Center

LUTONIX DCB in AV Access: A Single Center Experience

Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in the treatment of stenosis of hemodialysis arteriovenous fistulae: our experience

CP STENT. Large Diameter, Balloon Expandable Stent

Talent Abdominal Stent Graft

Decreased Incidence of Clotted AV Access in Hemodialysis Patients after the Implementation of Follow up Program

PREVENTION AND TREATMENT OF ANEURYSMS OF AUTOGENOUS DIALYSIS ACCESSES STEPHEN L. HILL, M.D.,F.A.C.S

HD Scanning: Velocities and Volume Flow

VERNACULAR Trial & Clinical Experience with the VENOVO Venous Stent

The SplitWire Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty Scoring Device. Instructions for Use

Case #1. Case #1- Possible codes. Unraveling the -59 modifier. Principles of Interventional. CASE 1: Simple angioplasty

VIRTUS: Trial Design and Primary Endpoint Results

Stent Graft versus Balloon Angioplasty for Failing Dialysis-Access Grafts

Real-World Experience With Drug-Coated Balloons in AV Access

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

Angiographic Changes following the Use of a Purse-String Suture Hemostasis Device in Hemodialysis Access Interventions

Superficialización de la vena basílica. Pierre BOURQUELOT, Paris

Percutaneous AV Fistula Creation. Ellipsys EndoAVF System

BY PETER H. LIN, MD; PANAGIOTIS KOUGIAS, MD; HOSAM F. EL SAYED, MD; TAM T. HUYNH, MD; AND MICHAEL B. SILVA, JR, MD

Accurate Vessel Sizing Drives Clinical Results. IVUS In the Periphery

2006 NKF-DOQI Guidelines Preferred Vascular Access Order 1. Radiocephalic (wrist) fistula 2. Brachiocephalic (elbow) fistula 3. Basilic vein transposi

ASDIN 7th Annual Scientific Meeting DISCLOSURES TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS TECHNICAL CONSIDERATIONS UTILITY OF ULTRASOUND IN EVALUATING ACCESS

Postoperative AV Fistula Evaluation. Postoperative examination protocol. Postoperative AVF Protocol. Hemodialysis Access Surveillance

Inflow stenosis in arteriovenous fistulas and grafts: A multicenter, prospective study

A Practical Review of the Use of Stents for the Maintenance of Hemodialysis Access

FLEXIBLE, BALOON EXPANDABLE

Ultrasound as a Tool for Preoperative Planning, Monitoring, and Interventions in Dialysis Arteriovenous Access

ASDIN 7th Annual Scientific Meeting

Thrombectomy, open, arteriovenous fistula without revision, autogenous or nonautogenous dialysis graft (separate procedure)

UPDATE IN VASCULAR ACCESS Mercedeh Kiaii MD FRCPC Rick Luscombe RN BSN CNeph(C) Elizabeth Lee MD FRCPC

Selection of Permanent Hemodialysis Vascular Access

Update on the Ranger clinical trial programme

Endovascular treatment of hemodialysis access pseudoaneurysms

Ultrasound and the dialysis patient

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES Public Health Service

UC SF. End Stage Renal Disease. National Kidney Foundation Dialysis Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) BUT-- No Cephalic Vein What s Next

Lessons & Perspectives: What is the role of Cryoplasty in SFA Intervention?

Department of Vascular Surgery, Maastricht University, Maastricht - The Netherlands 2

HeRO. Jeffrey H. Lawson, M.D., Ph.D. Departments of Surgery and Pathology Duke University Medical Center Durham, North Carolina

Guidelines for Arteriovenous Access Intervention, Management and Abandonment, and for Removal of Pre- Study Dialysis Catheter

Is a Stent or Scaffold Necessary in The SFA?

Lysis-Assisted Balloon (LAB) Thrombectomy

Outcomes Of Combined Rheolytic And Rotational Mechanical Thrombectomy For Total Access Circuit Thrombosis In Hemodialysis Patients

Case Endovascular management of non maturing dyalisis vascular access

Update from Korea on the Lutonix SFA registry 12 month data

Measure #329: Adult Kidney Disease: Catheter Use at Initiation of Hemodialysis National Quality Strategy Domain: Effective Clinical Care

Endovascular Declotting of Wall-Adherent Thrombi in Hemodialysis Vascular Access

Supera for the Juxta-anastomotic AVF Stenosis

Transcription:

COVERA Vascular Covered Stents in the Management of Dysfunctional AV Access Bart L. Dolmatch, M.D., FSIR Palo Alto Medical Foundation Mountain View, CA USA

This presentation is being made on behalf of Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. Any discussion regarding BARD products during the presentation today is limited to information that is consistent with the clearances for those products. Please consult Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. product labels and inserts for any indications, contraindications, hazards, warnings, cautions and instructions for use. Dr. Dolmatch has been compensated by Bard Peripheral Vascular, Inc. to participate in this presentation.

1 0 Circuit Patency after Creation AV Fistulae and AV Grafts Huber et al., Patency of autogenous and polytetrafluoroethylene upper extremity arteriovenous hemodialysis accesses: A systematic review (J Vasc Surg 2003;38:1005-11.)

Summary of Interventions required to achieve Secondary Patency Forearm Fistula (n=209) Upper Arm Fistula (n=74) Prosthetic Grafts (n=156) Balloon Angioplasty 311 136 279 Declot Procedures 60 39 158 Number of Stents used 18 37 80 Total Procedures 389 212 517 Procedures per patient year 1,8 2,9 3,3 Turmel-Rodrigues et al., Treatment of Stenosis and Thrombosis in Hemodialysis Fistulas and Grafts by Interventional Radiology, Nephrol Dial Transplant (2000) 15: 2029-2036

Recurrent Stenosis after PTA is Common Pre Treatment PTA Post PTA 2 months later Bard FLAIR Pivotal Study (Code HXM HM) The results from case studies may not be predictive for all patients. Individual results may vary depending on a variety of patient specific attributes.

Bare Metal Stents? BARD RESCUE CLINICAL STUDY 206-018

Four Level 1 Multicenter, Prospective Randomized Controlled Clinical Trials (RCT) evaluated technologies for patency improvement over standard of care balloon angioplasty in patients dialyzing with an AV Graft

BSI Peripheral Cutting Balloon (PCB) Vesely et al., J Vasc Interv Radiol 2005 Dec;16(12):1593-603 Patients N=340 Stenotic ( 50 %), AVG [N=195] & thrombosed AV Grafts [N=145] Follow-Up 14 days, 1, 3, 6 Months Clinically driven follow-up No mandatory diagnostic imaging during follow up w/o clinical indicator P = 0.373 No Significant Improvement Studies vary by design and patient population, and may yield different outcomes.

BARD FLAIR Stent Graft PIVOTAL Trial Haskal et al., N Engl J Med 2010; 362: 494-503 Patients N=190 Stenotic ( 50 %), dysfunctional AVG No thrombosed grafts Follow-Up 2 and 6 Months Mandatory magnified angiogram at 2 and 6 months P < 0.001 Studies vary by design and patient population, and may yield different outcomes.

BARD FLAIR Stent Graft RENOVA Trial Haskal et al., J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2016 Aug;27(8):1105-1114 Patients N=270 Stenotic ( 50 %), dysfunctional AVG No thrombosed grafts Follow-Up 12 and 24 Months Clinically driven follow-up P<0.001 No mandatory diagnostic imaging during follow up w/o clinical indicator P < 0.001 Studies vary by design and patient population, and may yield different outcomes.

Gore Viabahn TM Endoprosthesis REVISE Vesely et al., J Vasc Surg 2016 Nov;64(5):1400-1410 Patients N=293 Stenotic ( 50 %) AVG [N=164] & thrombosed AV Grafts [N=129] Follow-Up 1,3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 Months Clinically driven follow-up No mandatory diagnostic imaging during follow up w/o clinical indicator P = 0.006 Studies vary by design and patient population, and may yield different outcomes.

Covera TM 3 mm larger flared outflow end Straight and flared implant configuration to accomodate for diameter differences in AV access anatomy Not Available for Sale in the U.S. Caution: Investigational Device Exemption, Limited by United States Law to Investigational Use

CoveraTM Vascular Covered Stent Dual layer eptfe covering Carbon impregnation on the luminal (blood contacting) surface Diameters 6 mm 10 mm Lengths 30 mm 100 mm Not Available for Sale in the U.S. Caution: Investigational Device Exemption, Limited by United States Law to Investigational Use

COVERA TM Vascular Covered Stent Ongoing Clinical Studies Prospective, Multi-Center, Randomized, Concurrently- Controlled Clinical Study of the Bard Arteriovenous (AV) Stent Graft in the Treatment of Stenosis in the Venous Outflow of AV Fistula Access Circuits (AV Fistula) Prospective, Multi-Center, Clinical Study of the Bard COVERA Arteriovenous (AV) Stent Graft in the Treatment of Stenosis at the Graft-Vein Anastomosis of AV Graft Circuits (AV Graft)

Study Design Objective Number of Patients Prospective, Multi-Center, Single-Arm To assess the safety and effectiveness of the BARD COVERA Vascular Covered Stent for the treatment of stenotic lesions at the graft-vein anastomosis of hemodialysis patients dialyzing with an AV graft. 110 patients enrolled at 14 US sites

Key Inclusion Criteria CLINICAL AV access graft in an arm that has been implanted for 30 days, undergone 1 dialysis session Thrombosed and non thrombosed AV grafts ANGIOGRAPHIC Stenosis 50% at graftvein anastomosis with clinical or hemodynamic evidence of AV graft dysfunction Target lesion 9 cm long Reference vessel diameter 5.0-9.0 mm

Primary Safety Endpoint Primary Effectiveness Endpoint Follow Up Status Freedom from any protocol defined safety event(s) involving the AV access circuit through 30 days: Performance Goal = 88% Target Lesion Primary Patency (TLPP) - 6 months: Performance Goal = 40% 30 & 90 days, 6, 12, 18, & 24 months 6 Month Follow Up completed

Case Description Male, 47 Y Pre dilatation with 7 x 40 PTA balloon 9 x 60 flared COVERA Vascular Covered Stent The opinions and clinical experiences presented herein are for informational purposes only. The results from case studies may not be predictive for all patients. Individual results may vary depending on a variety of patient specific attributes. Bard AVeVA Clinical Study 401-017

Demographics Age Categories <65 years 47.3% 65 and < 75 years 28.2% 75 years 24.5% Gender Male 45.5% Female 54.5% BMI Categories < 30 61.8% 30 38.2%

Lesion and Circuit Characteristics

Study Device Characteristics Summary of Study Device Details Stent Graft Configuration Flared 83.6% Straight 16.4% Stent Graft Diameter 7 mm 9.1% 8 mm 56.4% 9 mm 30.0% 10 mm 4.5% Stent Graft Length 40 mm 49.1% 60 mm 42.7% 80 mm 8.2%

Safety Analysis Primary Safety Endpoint Proportion Freedom from any Primary Safety Event through 30 Days 96.4% The proportion of subjects free from primary safety events was 96.4%, which was superior to the PG of 88% (p-value = 0.0021). Primary safety endpoint was met

Effectiveness Analysis Primary Effectiveness Endpoint Target Lesion Primary Patency at 6 Months Proportion 70.3 % 70.3 % target lesion primary patency was superior to the PG of 40% (p-value < 0.0001). Primary effectiveness endpoint was met

Target Lesion Primary Patency to 6 Figure Months 14.2-1.1 (Kaplan-Meyer) C.R.Bard Inc. Page 1 of 1 Protocol: BPV-15-001 Interim 6-Month Report Kaplan Meier Curve of TLPP During the 6-Month Post Procedure Follow -Up Period All Treated Population 1.0 + Censored 0.9 0.8 71.1% 0.7 Survival Probability 0.6 0.5 0.4 0.3 0.2 PG = 40% 0.1 0 30 60 90 120 150 180 Time to Event (Days) Treatment: Covera Vascular Covered Stent Data Source: ADSL, ADEF Program name: ftlpp.sas Cutoff Date: Oct 5, 2017 Date: 11DEC2017 20:20

Conclusions The AVeVA Clinical Study is the 4 th large multicenter clinical study that demonstrated a primary patency benefit when covered stents are used for the treatment of AV Access Graft dysfunction. At 6 months, the COVERA Vascular Covered Stent was an effective therapy for the treatment of stenosis at the graft vein anastomosis in patients with thrombosed and nonthrombosed AV Grafts. The target lesion primary patency was significantly higher compared to the performance goal of 40%.

Disclaimer Trademarks are the property of their respective owners. 2018 BD. BD, the BD Logo, Bard, Flair and Covera are trademarks of Becton, Dickinson and Company.

COVERA Vascular Covered Stent Prescriptive Information Prescriptive Information Prior to use, please see the complete Instructions for Use for more information on Indications, Contraindicaions, Warnings, Precautions, Adverse Events and Operator s Instructions. INDICATIONS The COVERA Vascular Covered Stent is indicated for the treatment of stenoses in the upper extremity venous outflow of patients dialyzing with an arterio-venous (AV) access graft or fistula. CONTRAINDICATIONS There are no known contraindications for the COVERA Vascular Covered Stent. SELECT WARNINGS DO NOT use in patients whose AV access grafts have been implanted less than 30 days or in an immature fistula. DO NOT use the device in patients where full expansion of an appropriately sized PTA balloon catheter could not be achieve during pre-dilation with an angioplasty balloon. Placing a covered stent across a vessel side branch may impede blood flow and hinder or prevent future procedures. Covered stent placement beyond the ostium of the cephalic vein into the axillary/subclavian vein may hinder or prevent future access. DO NOT place a flared covered stent with the flared end in a straight vessel segment since this may lead to flow turbulences. The device has not been tested for tracking and deployment around an AV loop graft. SELECT PRECAUTIONS The safety and effectiveness of the device when placed across an aneurysm or a pseudo-aneurysm has not been evaluated. The safety and effectiveness of the device when used in central veins has not been evaluated. The safety and effectiveness of the device when placed across a previously placed bare metal stent has not been evaluated. The safety and effectiveness of the device when placed across the antecubital fossa has not been evaluated. The safety and effectiveness of the device when used in pediatrics has not been evaluated. The effects of direct cannulation of the covered stent have not been evaluated. Notify the patient that the covered stent should not be directly cannulated for hemodialysis and that applying pressure to the implant area should be avoided. The device has not been tested for use in an overlapped condition with a bare metal stent or covered stent.

COVERA Vascular Covered Stents in the Management of Dysfunctional AV Access Bart L. Dolmatch, M.D., FSIR Palo Alto Medical Foundation Mountain View, CA USA