Initial Clinical Experience with a Novel Dedicated Cobalt Chromium Stent for the Treatment of Below-the-knee Arterial Disease

Similar documents
Present & future of below the knee stenting

The present status of selfexpanding. for CLI: Why and when to use. Sean P Lyden MD Cleveland Clinic Cleveland, Ohio

Making BTK Interventions more Durable: Are DES and DCB the answer? Thomas Zeller, MD

Endovascular treatment of infrapopliteal arteries: angioplasty vs stent in the drug-eluting era

Update on Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty (TOBA) Below the Knee. Marianne Brodmann, MD Medical University Graz Graz, Austria

Specificities for infrapopliteal stents

Is there still any space left for DES in the BTK area??? (Angiolite BTK trial, 6 month Data)

John E. Campbell, MD Assistant Professor of Surgery and Medicine Department of Vascular Surgery West Virginia University, Charleston Division

Dealing with Calcification in BTK Arteries: Is Lithoplasty the Answer?

Clinical Data Update for Drug Coated Balloons (DCB) Seung-Whan Lee, MD, PhD

Disclosures. Tips and Tricks for Tibial Intervention. Tibial intervention overview

Konstantinos Katsanos, MSc, MD, PhD, EBIR. Consultant Interventional Radiologist Guy's and St.Thomas' Hospitals, NHS Foundation Trust

Olive registry: 3-years outcome of BTK intervention in Japan. Osamu Iida, MD Kansai Rosai Hospital Amagasaki, Hyogo, Japan

THE NEW ARMENIAN MEDICAL JOURNAL

Endovascular Intervention BtK Intervention in Patients with Chronic Dialysis

Lessons & Perspectives: What is the role of Cryoplasty in SFA Intervention?

9/7/2018. Disclosures. CV and Limb Events in PAD. Challenges to Revascularization. Challenges. Answering the Challenge

Below-knee Bare Nitinol Stent Placement in High-risk Patients with Critical Limb Ischaemia and Unlimited Supragenicular Inflow as Treatment of Choice

Potential Conflicts of Interest

PAD and CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA: EVALUATION AND TREATMENT 2014

Clinically proven. ordering info. Vascular Intervention // Peripheral Self-Expanding Stent System/0.018 /OTW. Pulsar-18

Comparison Of Primary Long Stenting Versus Primary Short Stenting For Long Femoropopliteal Artery Disease (PARADE)

Current Status and Limitations in the Treatment of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis

Fabrizio Fanelli, MD, EBIR Director Vascular and Interventional Radiology Department "Careggi " University Hospital Florence - Italy

Clinical and morphological features of patients who underwent endovascular interventions for lower extremity arterial occlusive diseases

One Year after In.Pact Deep: Lessons learned from a failed trial. Prof. Dr. Thomas Zeller

2-YEAR DATA SUPERA POPLITEAL REAL WORLD

Drug eluting stents and balloons in peripheral arterial disease A.T.O. ABDOOL-CARRIM UNIVERSITY OF WITWATERSRAND

Christian Wissgott MD, PhD Assistant Director, Radiology Westküstenkliniken Heide

Merits and demerits of DES, DEB or covered stent in lower extremity arterial occlusive disease 성균관의과대학삼성서울병원순환기내과최승혁

The Utility of Atherectomy and the Jetstream Atherectomy System

Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Practical Approach

The Role of Lithotripsy in Solving the Challenges of Vascular Calcium. Thomas Zeller, MD

Robert W. Fincher, DO The Ritz-Carlton, Dove Mountain Marana, Arizona February 7th, 2015

Vasile Goldiş Western University of Arad Faculty of Medicine, Pharmacy and Dental Medicine, Arad, Romania

There are multiple endovascular options for treatment

CLI Treatment Using Long and Scoring Balloons

Utility of Image-Guided Atherectomy for Optimal Treatment of Ambiguous Lesions by Angiography

PATIENT SPECIFIC STRATEGIES IN CRITICAL LIMB ISCHEMIA. Dr. Manar Trab Consultant Vascular Surgeon European Vascular Clinic DMCC Dubai, UAE

The essentials for BTK procedures: wires, balloons, what else

Neuestes aus der Therapie der pavk. beschichtete Stents + Ballons. Karls-University. Eberhard-Karls. of Tubingen Department of Diagnostic Radiology

What Happened in the IN.PACT Deep Trial. Zaheed Tai, DO,FACC,FSCAI Bos4ck Heart Center Winter Haven, FL

Prospective, randomized controlled study of paclitaxel-coated versus plain balloon angioplasty for the treatment of failing dialysis access

January 23, Vascular and oncological interventional radiology Paris Descartes University

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Which Stent Is Best for Various Femoropopliteal Anatomy? 2018 Pacific Northwest Endovascular Conference June 15-26, 2018 Seattle, WA

Atherectomy is Still Live and Effective. John R. Laird, MD Professor of Medicine Medical Director of the Vascular Center UC Davis Health System

The ZILVERPASS study a randomized study comparing ZILVER PTX stenting with Bypass in femoropopliteal lesions

Rationale and algorithm for below-the-knee acute gain optimization

2017 Cardiology Survival Guide

Evolving Role of Drug-Eluting Stents In Complex SFA - Majestic Trial Data

MULTIVESSEL PCI. IN DRUG-ELUTING STENT RESTENOSIS DUE TO STENT FRACTURE, TREATED WITH REPEAT DES IMPLANTATION

Endovascular Should Be Considered First Line Therapy

Surgical Options for revascularisation P E T E R S U B R A M A N I A M

Drug-coated balloons in BTK:

Final Results of the Feasibility Study for the Drug-coated Chocolate Touch PTA balloon. (The ENDURE Trial)

Endovascular Options in Critical Limb Ischemia: Below The Knee Therapies

Leg arteries : MANAGEMENT and STRATEGY

Turbo-Power. Laser atherectomy catheter. The standard. for ISR

Methods Study Design. Patient Population. Study Device. Stent Procedure and Follow-up. 312 Journal of Endovascular Therapy 24(3)

Imaging Strategy For Claudication

TOBA II 12-Month Results Tack Optimized Balloon Angioplasty

The incidence of peripheral artery disease (PAD)

Stratifying Management Options for Patients with Critical Limb Ischemia: When Should Open Surgery Be the Initial Option for CLI?

Bioabsorbable Scaffolding: Technology and Clinical Update. PD Dr. Nicolas Diehm, MD, FESC Inselspital, University Hospital Bern, Switzerland

Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Patients with Intermittent Claudication: Insights from the IN.PACT Global Full Clinical Cohort

Current status in BTK interventions

Lutonix DCB in BTK Update on the BTK real world registry and RCT

LUTONIX DCB in BTK Update on the BTK clinical program & single center experience

Future Algorithm for Lower Extremity Revascularization: Where Does Vessel Prep Fit?

Disclosures. Talking Points. An initial strategy of open bypass is better for some CLI patients, and we can define who they are

New Data to Shape the Era of Drug Elution in Peripheral Interventions

Hiroshi Ando, MD Kasukabe Chuo General Hospital Saitama, Japan

Outcomes Of DCB Use In Real World Registries: 2 Year Results From The INPACT Global Registry

BTK Case Studies Joseph Cardenas, MD AZ Heart & Vascular, Yuma, AZ

BTK Intervention with Drug- Coated Balloons: Past Lessons and Future Exploration

In-Stent Restenosis: New Evidence From Laser + Drug Coated Balloons

New Evidence from Laser + Drug Coated Balloons for Treatment of In-Stent Restenosis

IMPORTANT INFORMATION: These materials are intended to describe common clinical considerations and procedural steps for the on-label use of

Update on the role of drug eluting balloons

MEET M. Bosiers K. Deloose P. Peeters. SFA stenting in 2009 : The good and the ugly What factors influence patency?

Accurate Vessel Sizing Drives Clinical Results. IVUS In the Periphery

Hypothesis: When compared to conventional balloon angioplasty, cryoplasty post-dilation decreases the risk of SFA nses in-stent restenosis

Are DES and DEB worth the cost in BTK interventions?

Popliteal Aneurysm: When is surgical therapy indicated? PROF. GRZEGORZ OSZKINIS

Medical therapy after angioplasty / stenting

Intravascular Imaging Insights into the Mechanism of Action of Focal Force Balloon Angioplasty

Current Status of DCB Experience with Non- Femoropopliteal Applications (Dialysis, Tibial, Venous)

Paclitaxel Drug-Eluting Stents in Peripheral Arterial Disease: A Health Technology Assessment

Long Lesions: Primary stenting or DCB first? John Laird MD Adventist Heart and Vascular Institute, St. Helena, CA

Retrograde dorsalis pedis and posterior tibial artery access after failed antegrade angioplasty

Clinical benefits on DES Patient s perspectives

Plaque Excision Infrainguinal PAD An update on this nonstenting alternative, with intermediate-term results of the ongoing TALON Registry.

Forget about the angiosome theories. Yann Gouëffic, MD, PhD Department of vascular surgery, institut du thorax, Nantes, France

The Burden of CLI and Crosser Catheter Recanalization Strategies

Tom Eisele, Benedikt M. Muenz, and Grigorios Korosoglou. Department of Cardiology & Vascular Medicine, GRN Hospital Weinheim, Weinheim, Germany

Current Vascular and Endovascular Management in Diabetic Vasculopathy

The Struggle to Manage Stroke, Aneurysm and PAD

Transcription:

Initial Clinical Experience with a Novel Dedicated Cobalt Chromium Stent for the Treatment of Below-the-knee Arterial Disease a report by Angelo Cioppa, Luigi Salemme, Vittorio Ambrosini, Giovanni Sorropago, Eugenio Stabile, Tullio Tesorio, Giancarlo Biamino and Paolo Rubino The incidence and prevalence of critical limb ischaemia (CLI) is progressively increasing, mainly because of the widespread incidence of diabetes mellitus and longer life expectancy in developed countries. 1 Beyond lifestyle changes and medical therapy, arterial revascularisation is a mainstay in the management of patients with CLI due to below-the-knee (BTK) disease in order to improve functional class and prevent complications possibly leading to amputation and limb loss. 2 Until recently vascular surgery by means of distal bypasses was considered the only feasible revascularisation option, 1,2 but the introduction of dedicated techniques and devices has shown that percutaneous arterial revascularisation by means of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is feasible and safe in these patients, with satisfactory clinical results. 3,4 Furthermore, the landmark Bypass versus Angioplasty in Severe Ischaemia of the Leg (BASIL) trial indicates that a percutaneous revascularisation strategy is probably equivalent to bypass surgery in patients with CLI. 5 However, there remains room for improvement, as PTA may carry risks of suboptimal result, abrupt vessel closure or late restenosis or re-occlusion. Stent implantation has proved highly beneficial in the coronary realm and, thanks also to the development of drug-eluting stents (DES), has become a standard for most percutaneous coronary interventions. Conversely, the role of stenting in peripheral artery disease is still debated, especially when the BTK district is considered. Indeed, only a few reports to date are available on BTK stenting (see Table 1), 6 17 with only one pertinent randomised trial supporting stenting versus standard PTA. 14 Among the concerns raised on the infragenicular use of stents are the risks of fracture, restenosis and thrombosis. Another major issue is the lack of dedicated and long stents able to treat the typical BTK lesion: a long and calcified segment often with diffuse occlusive disease. Most recently, a dedicated device for BTK use has been developed: the Chromis Deep stent (Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy) (see Figures 1 and 2). Engineered as a BTK-lesion-specific stent to allow treatment of long diffusely diseased infrapopliteal vessel segments (as normally encountered in CLI patients), the Chromis Deep is a BTK-dedicated stent and delivery system. The stent consists of a cobalt chromium balloonexpandable metallic platform with closed-cell design, thin struts, diameters ranging between 2.0 and 4.0mm and lengths spanning from 10 to 76 mm. The delivery system is a 0.014-inch guidewire-compatible balloon catheter based on the BTK-dedicated PTA balloon Amphirion DEEP (Invatec, Roncadelle, Italy). Chromis Deep is available in over-thewire designs, with shaft lengths of 120cm (for ipsilateral access) or 150cm (for contralateral access). The aim of this retrospective study was to assess the safety and efficacy of the Chromis Deep stent in the treatment of patients with BTK disease following failed PTA. Division of Invasive Cardiology, Montevergine Clinic, Mercogliano Methods We abstracted baseline procedural and follow-up data on all consecutive patients who underwent implantation of a Chromis Deep stent in our institution between June 2006 and September 2007. All patients gave written informed consent, and the retrospective study was conducted in accordance with the local ethics committee. Patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (Rutherford category 3 6) underwent arterial angiography by means of ipsilateral or contrlateral access. 18 After angiographic documentation of infrapopliteal stenotic (>70% diameter reduction) or occlusive disease, PTA was attempted using dedicated guidewires and semi-compliant balloons, as per routine at our centre. Specifically, BTK-dedicated 0.014-inch guidewires and over-the-wire balloons were used to cross and dilate (12 14atm for two to three minutes) the diseased segments. 4 After retrieval of the balloon, digital subtraction angiography was performed to appraise post-pta results. Stenting with the Chromis Deep was then considered only in cases of failed PTA, classified as persistent suboptimal angiographic result (residual diameter stenosis >50%) or flow-limiting dissection in a non-bending zone. All patients were pre-treated with aspirin and/or clopidogrel and peri-procedurally managed with 70 100IU.kg of unfractioned heparin. Post-procedurally, haemostasis was achieved either manually or with closure devices, 19 and both aspirin and clopidogrel were continued for at least four weeks. A clinical follow-up visit was performed in all patients and included assessment of vital status and Duplex ultrasound imaging of the affected limb. In cases of lack of clinical improvement, clinical recurrence (e.g. foot ulcer) or ultrasound evidence of restenosis or re-occlusion, patients underwent repeat lower limb angiography, followed by revascularisation where appropriate. The primary end-point of the study was limb salvage rate for patients with CLI and improvement of Rutherford classification for claudicant patients. 20 We also appraised the risk of major (above the ankle) and Angelo Cioppa is an Interventional Cardiologist in the Division of Invasive Cardiology at the Montevergine Clinic in Mercogliano, where he has served since 1999. He initially specialised in coronary interventions, but since 2003 has dedicated himself to the peripheral endovascular programme developed by Professor Giancarlo Biamino and Professor Paolo Rubino, with an emphasis on critical limb ischaemia. E: cioppaangelo@hotmail.com DOI: 10.17925/USE.2009.05.1.69 TOUCH BRIEFINGS 2008 69

Figure 1: The Chromis Deep Stent Before Deployment (A) and Expanded (B) A Figure 2: Percutaneous Transluminal Implantation of a Chromis Deep Stent in a Patient with a Tight Stenosis of the Proximal Anterior Tibial Artery A B C B A: baseline; B: during implantation of the stent; C: after stenting and distal balloon dilation. Table 1: Previous Reports on Infrapopliteal Stenting for Critical Limb Ischaemia Study Number of Design Stent Type Patients Bosiers et al., 2005 20 Registry BE bioabsorbable stent Bosiers et al., 2006 18 Registry Sirolimus DES Bosiers et al., 2007 47 Registry SE nitinol stent Commeau et al., 2006 30 Registry Sirolimus DES Feiring et al., 2004 82 Registry BE BMS Feiring et al., 2007 5 Case series Sirolimus DES Kickuth et al., 2007 35 Registry SE nitinol stent Morgan et al., 2005 6 Case series BE BMS Rand et al., 2006 24 Randomised BE BMS clinical trial (versus PTA) Scheinert et al., 2006 60 Non-randomised Sirolimus DES controlled study (versus BE BMS) Siablis et al., 2005 29 Non-randomised Sirolimus DES controlled study (vs BE BMS) Siablis et al., 2007 29 Registry Paclitaxel DES Tepe et al., 2007 18 Registry SE nitinol stent BE = balloon-expandable stent; BMS = bare-metal stent; DES = drug-eluting stent; SE = self-expandable stent. minor (below the ankle) amputation, occurrence of restenosis or re-occlusion, change in Rutherford class and repeat revascularisations. For statistical analysis, continuous variables are reported as mean ± standard deviation and categorical variables as n (%). Ankle Brachial Pressure Index (ABPI) changes are evaluated by a pair student t-test. Rutherford class changes are evaluated by two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). For both tests, p<0.05 is taken as statistically significant. Results Between June 2006 and September 2007, a total of of 40 patients underwent BTK revascularisation in our institution: 29 (72.5%) with CLI and 11 (27.5%) with life-limiting claudication (LLC). A total of 20 patients were treated with 23 Chromis Deep stents in the same period due to failed PTA. and procedural characteristics are reported in Tables 2 and 3, respectively. Specifically, there were 15 men (75%), average age was 67±16 years and 12 of the patients (60%) had diabetes, of whom six (30%) were insulin-dependent. Most patients (19 [95%]) presented Table 2: Characteristics of Patients Treated with the Chromis Deep Stent Male gender 15 (75%) Age (years) 67±16 Hypertension 15 (75%) Dyslipidaemia 10 (50%) Smoking status Previous smoker 12 (60%) Current smoker 8 (40%) Diabetes mellitus Non-insulin-dependent 6 (30%) Insulin-dependent 6 (30%) Renal failure Serum creatinine >2.0mg/l 9 (45%) Dialysis 3 (15%) Rutherford class at admission Nr (%) of patients ABPI 1 0 2 0 3 1 (5%) 0.65±0.11 4 6 (30%) 0.48±0.12 5 10 (50%) 0.3±0.06 6 3 (15%) 0.26±0.20 ABPI = Ankle Brachial Pressure Index. with CLI: six (30%) under Rutherford class 4, 10 (50%) under Rutherford class 5 and three (15%) under Rutherford class 6, and only one patient (5%) presented with LLC under Rutherford class 3. The target lesion was the proximal portion of the tibial artery (in overlap with the popliteal artery) in three of the patients (15%), the anterior tibial artery in eight (40%), the tibio-peroneal trunk in four (20%) and the posterior tibial artery in five (25%). Total occlusions were common (14 [70%]), as were long and diffusely diseased lesions (13 [66.7%]). Most stents had a diameter of 3.0mm (10 [50%]) and a length of 76mm (15 [75%]). Deployment pressure was 9±3atm (see Table 4). Short, noncompliant balloons were also employed in cases of calcific or fibrotic lesions to optimally expand the stent. All procedures were angiographically and clinically successful. After eight months (246±101 days) of follow-up, all patients showed clinical improvement in their functional status (see Tables 5 and 6): the median Rutherford class change was from 5 to 3 (p<0.01), with most patients 70 INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

A Novel Dedicated Cobalt Chromium Stent for the Treatment of Below-the-knee Arterial Disease Table 3: Angiographic and Procedural Characteristics of Patients Treated with the Chromis Deep Stent Location of stented lesion Proximal tibial-distal popliteal* 3 (15%)* Anterior tibial 8 (40%) Tibio-peroneal trunk 4 (20%) Posterior tibial artery 5 (25%) Total occlusion 14 (70%) Mean lesion length (mm) 112±35 Mean stented length (mm) 72.2±11.7 Concomitant treatment of superficial femoral artery 8 (40%) Patients with two Chromis Deep stents implanted 3 (15%) Total number of Chromis Deep stents implanted 23 Number of Chromis Deep stents per patient 1.15 Stent diameter (mm) 2.5 5 (22%) 3.0 12 (52%) 3.5 6 (26%) Stent length (mm) 38 8 (35%) 76 15 (65%) Maximum dilation pressure (atm) 9±3 Procedural success 20 (100%) * Either the anterior tibial artery or the tibio-peroneal trunk. Table 4: Clinical Results at in Patients Treated with the Chromis Deep Stent completion 20 (100%) Clinical follow-up 246±101 (days) Major amputations (above the ankle) in CLI patients 0 Minor amputations (below the ankle) in CLI patients 0 Limb salvage rate (19 CLI patients) 19 (100%) Re-hospitalisations 6 (30%)* Repeat percutaneous transluminal angioplasty 6 (30%) Duplex ultrasound scan (n=20) No restenosis 14 (70%) Restenosis or re-occlusion 6 (30%) * One patient had two re-hospitalisations. All repeat percutaneous transluminal angioplasties were successful. In a patient treated in the superficial femoral artery and tibio-peroneal trunk, both lesions were re-occluded, whereas another subject showed thrombotic subocclusion at the proximal edge of the stent (i.e. in-segment restenosis), but in the absence of significant in-stent restenosis. CLI = critical limb ischaemia. Table 5: Rutherford Class Change at Rutherford Class 1 0 0 2 0 4 (20%) 3 1 (5%) 12 (60%) 4 6 (30%) 4(20%) 5 10 (50%) 0 (0%) 6 3 (15%) 0 (0%) Figure 3: Rutherford Class Change at 100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% p<0.01 Ruth. 1 Ruth. 2 Ruth. 3 Ruth.4 Ruth. 5 Ruth. 6 Despite major improvements in the non-invasive and invasive management of symptomatic peripheral artery disease, the incidence and prevalence of its most severe form, CLI, is still increasing. 1 Arterial revascularisation by means of distal bypasses is a well established and effective treatment for CLI, especially when saphenous vein grafts are available. Unfortunately, many patients are poor surgical candidates or lack suitable veins. These issues provided the impetus for the introduction of dedicated endovascular techniques and devices, leading to an ever-increasing application of infragenicular percutaneous arterial revascularisation by means of PTA. 3,4 Despite many years of uncertainty, current evidence supports the choice of an initial endovascular management, with bypass surgery reserved for the most severe or recurrent cases. 4,5 Indeed, failures of PTA are not uncommon, despite the availability of dedicated guidewires and balloons. Specifically, PTA has been shown to lead to early risk of suboptimal result due to fibrotic or calcific lesions, abrupt vessel closure due to flow-limiting dissection or thrombus and late restenosis/re-occlusion due to recoil, constrictive remodelling and/or hyperplasia. (12 [60%]) in Rutherford class 3 and none in Rutherford class >4. ABPI also showed significant improvement: the mean change was from 0.32±0.10 to 0.75±0.14 (p<0.001). One hundred per cent limb salvage was achieved in all CLI patients, with no major or minor amputations. Duplex ultrasound follow-up, completed in 20 patients (100%), showed that restenosis or re-occlusion had occurred in six (30%). All of these patients underwent angiographically and procedurally successful repeat percutaneous revascularisation with PTA angioplasty. The role of stenting in peripheral artery disease is still controversial, especially when the BTK district is considered. The main limitations of BTK stenting are the risks of stent fracture in bends, 21 restenosis due to aggressive neointimal hyperplasia (common in poorly controlled diabetics such as those with CLI) and stent thrombosis possibly due to slow flow. In addition, most patients with CLI have extensive and diffuse disease, and most available stents with infragenicular sizes (diameter between 2.0 and 4.0mm) are coronary stents and thus too short (usually 33mm or less) to adequately cover BTK lesions. Discussion This study, the first to date to report on this novel dedicated device for BTK disease, suggests that implantation of the Chromis Deep stent in patients with CLI after failed PTA is feasible and safe, and provides favourable clinical results. Further studies are nonetheless needed to thoroughly and further appraise the role of BTK stenting in comparison with standard PTA. Despite these caveats, a number of studies are already available on BTK stenting (see Table 1). Data on the use of coronary-approved balloonexpandable bare-metal stents (BMS) in patients with CLI have been reported already by Feiring et al., 10 Morgan et al. 13 and Rand et al. for a total of 112 treated subjects. 14 Intriguingly, the latter authors have shown, in the only randomised clinical trial published to date on BTK stenting, that elective infragenicular implantation of balloon-expandable INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY 71

Table 6: Anke Brachial Pressure Index Change at 0.32±0.10 0.75±0.14 p<0.001 Figure 4a: Ankle Brachial Pressure Index Change at 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Figure 4b: Ankle Brachial Pressure Index Change at 1.00 this approach are quite promising, especially in light of the apparent superiority of DES in comparison with BMS, usage of DES in the BTK district seems to raise some questions and concerns. First, no study on BTK DES implantation was randomised, thus limiting internal and external validity. Second, stents developed for coronary vessels are available only in short sizes ( 33mm), thus limiting their usefulness and cost benefit balance in the diffusely diseased tibial vessels. Finally, patients with CLI must achieve ulcer healing; in these patients avoidance of angiographic restenosis is not usually a major issue, 4 thus the superior antirestenotic effect of DES may prove futile, 22 especially in light of the increased risk of stent thrombosis. Another focus of intense research has been the infragenicular implantation of the dedicated self-expandable nitinol Xpert stent (Abbott Vascular), a device specifically developed for BTK disease. Despite interesting and promising data from as many as 82 patients in two registries, 8,17 we await randomised controlled trials comparing this device with balloon-only PTA and/or balloon-expandable stenting. Finally, favourable but still very preliminary data have been reported by Bosiers et al. on 20 patients with CLI treated with bioabsorbable metallic stents, which hold the promise of enabling non-invasive and repeated treatment of severe atherosclerotic disease without the need to implant a permanent endoprosthesis. 6 0.90 p<0.001 0.75 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.32 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 BMS (actually carbofilm-coated devices, yet still belonging to the BMS family) was superior to balloon-only PTA in patients with CLI in preventing restenosis and re-occlusion of the treated lesion. 14 As many as six studies have reported on a total of 141 patients undergoing BTK implantation of a coronary-approved DES (either a sirolimus- or a paclitaxel-eluting device); of the DES, only the Cypher 3.0 33mm stent (Cordis) was approved for use in the BTK district, with an obvious off-label indication for all others. 7,9,11,15,16 While the results of Given this evidence base on BTK stenting, we believe that the present study lends further support to this endovascular approach in the treatment of patients with CLI. Furthermore, in spite of the significantly longer stented segments seen in the current study, our results with the new Chromis Deep stent appear similar to those reported in other studies in terms of restenosis, primary patency and limb salvage. On the other hand, the Chromis Deep stent has several distinct advantages over the other stents already employed in the infragenicular district, namely the large spectrum of diameters and lengths (with devices as long as 76mm), the flexible cobalt chromium platform and low-profile delivery systems with shaft lengths compatible with both ipsilateral and contralateral access. The 30% restenosis rate seems acceptable, especially when considering the mean stented length of 72.2mm. The clinical relevance of stent restenosis in the BTK district remains debatable; however, this study has a number of limitations, including the retrospective and single-centre design, the lack of a control group and the small sample size. Thus, larger and controlled trials are warranted to definitively appraise the risk benefit balance of this new dedicated stent for the treatment of infragenicular disease. Conclusions Infragenicular implantation of the new cobalt chromium balloonexpandable stent, Chromis Deep, in patients with CLI is feasible and safe, and appears to provide favourable clinical results. Additional controlled studies are nonetheless warranted to definitively appraise the clinical role of this device. 1. Hirsch AT, et al., J Am Coll Cardiol, 2006;47:1239 1312. 2. Norgren L, et al., Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2007;33:S1 S75. 3. Dorros G, et al., Circulation, 2001;104:2057 62. 4. Faglia E, et al., Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg, 2005;29:620 27. 5. Adam DJ, et al., Lancet, 2005;366:1925 34. 6. Peeters P, et al., J Endovasc Ther, 2005;12:1 5. 7. Bosiers M, et al., J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2006;47:171 6. 8. Bosiers M, et al., J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino), 2007;48:455 61. 9. Commeau P, et al., Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2006;68:793 8. 10. Feiring AJ, et al., J Am Coll Cardiol, 2004;44:2307 14. 11. Feiring AJ, et al., Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2007;69:665 70. 12. Kickuth R, et al., J Vasc Interv Radiol, 2007;18:703 8. 13. Morgan JH 3rd, et al., Am Surg, 2005;71:905 9. 14. Rand T, et al., Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol, 2006;29:29 38. 15. Scheinert D, et al., EuroInterv, 2006;2:169 74. 16. Siablis D, et al., J Endovasc Ther, 2005;12:685 95. 17. Tepe G, et al., Eur Radiol, 2007;17:2088 95. 18. Biondi-Zoccai GG, et al., Catheter Cardiovasc Interv, 2006;68:835 42. 19. Biondi-Zoccai GG, et al., Int J Cardiol, 2007;118:398 9. 20. Diehm N, et al., Eur Heart J, 2007;28:798 805. 21. Schwarzmaier-D Assie A, et al., J Endovasc Ther, 2007;14:106 9. 22. Agostoni P, et al., Am J Cardiol, 2006;97:603 5. 72 INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY

Invatec_ad.qxp 8/10/08 12:20 pm Page 73 If you really want to Infrapopliteal PTA Balloon Catheter Infrapopliteal 0.014" Guidewire lesion specific stenting Infrapopliteal Balloon-Expandable Stent System lesion specific stenting Infrapopliteal Self-Expanding Stent System