Gilead Sciences, Durham, NC, USA

Similar documents
Tenofovir as a drug of choice for the chronic hepatitis B treatment

Chan HLY, Chan CK, Hui AJ, et al. Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate in Chronic HBV Infected Patients with Normal ALT and High HBV DNA Levels

Mutazioni di HBV in corso di trattamento; quale approccio razionale?

Landmarks for Prevention and Treatment

Hepatitis B Virus therapy. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

NUCs for Chronic Hepatitis B. Rafael Esteban Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron and Ciberehd del Instituto Carlos III. Barcelona.

Novedades en el tratamiento de la hepatitis B: noticias desde la EASL. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebrón Barcelona

Is there a need for combination therapy? No. Maria Buti Hospital General Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona. Spain

Final Clinical Study Report. to the Dossier SYNOPSIS. Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI463110

The Impact of HBV Therapy on Fibrosis and Cirrhosis

Chronic Hepatitis B - Antiviral Resistance in Korea -

29th Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board Meeting

Is there a need for combination treatment? Yes!

HBV Diagnosis and Treatment

Hepatitis B Virus therapy. Maria Buti Hospital Universitario Valle Hebron Barcelona Spain

Don t interfere My first choice is always nucs!

Management of Chronic Hepatitis B in Asian Americans

Optimized HBV Treatment Through Baseline and on-treatment Predictor Oral Antiviral Therapy. Watcharasak Chotiyaputta

Management of Decompensated Chronic Hepatitis B

HBV Therapy in Special Populations: Liver Cirrhosis

Bristol-Myers Squibb

Update on HBV Treatment

Efficacy of Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate at 240 Weeks in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis B With High Baseline Viral Load

HBeAg-positve chronic hepatts B: Why do I treat my patent with a NA? Maria But

Acute Hepatitis B Virus Infection with Recovery

Inarigivir: A novel RIG-I agonist for chronic hepatitis B

Recent achievements in the treatment of hepatitis B by nucleosides and nucleotides. K. Zhdanov

How to use pegylated Interferon for Chronic Hepatitis B in 2015

Drug Class Monograph

Hepatitis B Prior Authorization Policy

TRANSPARENCY COMMITTEE OPINION. 8 July 2009

Hepatitis B Treatment Pearls. Agenda

Antiviral Therapy 2012; 17: (doi: /IMP1945)

Who to Treat? Consider biopsy Treat. > 2 ULN Treat Treat Treat Treat CIRRHOTIC PATIENTS Compensated Treat HBV DNA detectable treat

Does Viral Cure Prevent HCC Development

The Goal of HBV Therapy. Key Points. The Twin Pillars of HBV Therapy

SYNOPSIS. Clinical Study Report AI Addendum #1. Open-label Dosing Phase

Management of chronic hepatitis B : recent advance in the treatment of antiviral resistance

Hepatitis B and Interferon Philippe Sogni Paris-Descartes University, INSERM U-1016 and Hepatology unit, Cochin hospital, Paris; France PHC 2015

Hepatitis B Case Studies

Viral hepatitis Prevention Board. Clinical aspects of hepatitis B

Clinical Case. Christophe Hézode, Henri Mondor Hospital, Paris-Est University, Créteil, France

Entecavir Maintains a High Genetic Barrier to HBV Resistance Through 6 Years in Naïve Patients

Seven-Year Efficacy and Safety of Treatment with Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate for Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

What can the challenges we face? HBV: Long term NUC treatment

Viral hepatitis in reproductive health. Pierre Jean Malè. Training in Reproductive Health Research - Geneva 2006

entecavir, 0.5mg and 1mg film-coated tablets and 0.05 mg/ml oral solution, Baraclude SMC No. (747/11) Bristol-Myers Squibb Pharmaceuticals Ltd

Chronic HBV Management in 2013

A Treatment Algorithm for the Management of Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection in the United States: 2015 Update

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR HEPSERA. International Nonproprietary Name: Adefovir Dipivoxil. Procedure No. EMEA/H/C/485/II/30

For now, do not stop NUCs PHC R. PARANÁ Federal University of Bahia, Brazil HUPES-University Hospital Gastro-Hepatology Unit

Hepatitis B: Future treatment developments

The effect of lamivudine- versus tenofovir-containing antiretroviral regimen on hepatitis B infection in a cohort of HIV infected long term survivors

A tale of two patients

ESCMID Online Lecture Library. by author

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B 2013 update

Disclaimer. Presenter Release are for reactive use by Medical Information only internal learning/educational use only

Clinical dilemmas in HBeAg-negative CHB

MF Yuen 2, CS Coffin 3, M Elkhashab 4, S Greenbloom 5, A Ramji 6, H LY Chan 7, RP Iyer 1, S Locarnini 8, C Macfarlane 1, NH Afdhal 1, W Kim 9

Horizon Scanning Technology Summary. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for hepatitis B. National Horizon Scanning Centre. April 2007

Chronic Hepatitis B: management update.

EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B virus infection

Hepatitis B. Epidemiology and Natural History and Implications for Treatment

Study No.: ADF Title: Phase III study of adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) tablets in patients with compensated chronic hepatitis B -comparative study

Scottish Medicines Consortium

coinfected patients predicts HBsAg clearance during long term exposure to tenofovir

Slides are the property of the author and AASLD. Permission is required from both AASLD and the author for reuse.

ANNEX I SUMMARY OF PRODUCT CHARACTERISTICS

SB9200: A Novel and Efficacious RIG-I Agonist for Chronic Hepatitis B: Results from cohort 1 of the ACHIEVE Trial

Prediction of HBsAg Loss by Quantitative HBsAg Kinetics during Long-Term 2015

tenofovir disoproxil (as fumarate), 245mg, film-coated tablet (Viread ) SMC No. (720/11) Gilead Sciences Ltd

Treatment of hepatitis B

Viral Hepatitis The Preventive Potential of Antiviral Therapy. Thomas Berg

Original article Evolution of adefovir-resistant HBV polymerase gene variants after switching to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate monotherapy

HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. with a nucleos(t)ide analogue?

Long-term efficacy of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate therapy after multiple nucleos(t)ide analogue failure in chronic hepatitis B patients

Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate versus Adefovir Dipivoxil for Chronic Hepatitis B

Professor Vincent Soriano

HBV in HIV Forgotten but not Gone

An Update HBV Treatment

Diagnostic Methods of HBV and HDV infections

Short title: BENEFIT STUDY, STUDY REPORT (ML25614) Synopsis/Abstract

Our better understanding of the natural

TAF an overview Who? When? How? co-infected/ monoinfected

New Approaches to Hepatitis B Therapy

Individual Study Table Referring to the Dossier SYNOPSIS. Final Clinical Study Report for Study AI424138

CURRENT TREATMENT. Mitchell L Shiffman, MD Director Liver Institute of Virginia Bon Secours Health System Richmond and Newport News, Virginia

27/01/17. Post-partum ALT flare. HBV vaccine cannot protect all babies from high viral load carrier mothers

Serum Hepatitis B Surface Antigen Levels Help Predict Disease Progression in Patients With Low Hepatitis B Virus Loads. Hepatology Feb 2013

Gish RG and AC Gadano. J Vir Hep

Treatment of chronic hepatitis delta Case report

New therapeutic perspectives in HBV: when to stop NAs

High Rates of Viral Suppression After Long-term Entecavir Treatment of Asian Patients With Hepatitis B e Antigen Positive Chronic Hepatitis B

Current Status of HBV and Liver Transplant

AUSTRALIAN PRODUCT INFORMATION - BARACLUDE (ENTECAVIR)

NH2 N N N O N O O P O O O O O

Vemlidy. (tenofovir alafenamide) New Product Slideshow

ICVH 2016 Oral Presentation: 28

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy Advance Access published April 25, 2013

Hepatitis B: is there still a role for interferon?

Transcription:

Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Versus Emtricitabine Plus TDF () for Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B (CHB) In Patients with Persistent Viral Replication Receiving Adefovir Dipivoxil: Final Week 168 Results Thomas Berg 1, Patrick Marcellin 2, Bernd Moller 3, Huy N. Trinh 4, Sing Chan 5, Emilio Suarez 6, Andrea Snow-Lampart 7, Kenneth J. Peschell 7, Katyna Borroto-Esoda 7, Kenneth R. Hirsch 7, David Frederick 7 1 Universitätsklinik Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany; 2 Hopital Beaujon, Clichy, France; 3 Private Practice, Berlin, Germany; 4 Private Practice, San Jose, CA, USA; 5 Private Practice, Flushing, NY, USA; 6 Hospital Universitario de Valme, Sevilla, Spain; 7 Gilead Sciences, Durham, NC, USA 61 st Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases October 29th - November 2nd 2010 Boston, MA, USA

Thomas Berg, MD I have financial relationships within the last 12 months relevant to my presentation with Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Human Genome Sciences, Merck, Roche, Schering Plough, Tibotec, Vertex AND My presentation does include discussion of off-label or investigational use for the treatment of HBV

Introduction Virologic suppression by adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) is incomplete in some cases, resulting in persistent viremia on treatment Options include switching to a single more potent drug or to two drugs with different resistance pathways The preferred treatment strategy in this heavily pretreated population remains to be defined and requires continued evaluation beyond 2 years

Study Objective A comparison of the long-term safety and efficacy of two treatment strategies for ADV suboptimal responders, most with prior/current lamivudine (LAM) use: Compare the antiviral efficacy (HBV DNA < 400 copies/ml) of Monotherapy with TDF 300 mg QD (with option to add FTC 200 mg) versus Fixed-dose combination of FTC 200 mg + TDF 300 mg QD The data were analyzed by Intent to treat (ITT): virologic failure = persistent HBV DNA 400 copies/ml (69 IU/mL), or a confirmed loss of response or discontinuation (noncompleter=failure (NC=F)). Subjects on open-label will not be considered failures unless they meet the criteria described above.

Key Eligibility Criteria 18 69 years of age HBeAg positive or negative Currently treated with ADV 10 mg QD (for 24 weeks but 96 weeks), with persistent viremia (HBV DNA 172 IU/mL (1000 copies/ml) (Roche Cobas TaqMan Assay, lower limit of quantification 29 IU/mL [169 copies/ml]) Concomitant and past treatment with lamivudine permitted ALT levels < 10 the upper limit of normal (ULN) Compensated liver disease; no evidence of HCC No co-infection with HCV, HIV, or HDV

Study 106 Design RANDOMIZATION 1:1 Double Blind Tenofovir 300 mg FTC 200 mg / Tenofovir 300 mg Week 24* Total Study Duration = 168 Weeks (Blinded or Open Label) Blinded TDF or OL Blinded or OL Blinded TDF or OL Blinded or OL Week 48 Analysis (Berg et. al., Gastro 2010) Week 96 Analysis (EASL 2009) Blinded TDF or OL Blinded or OL Week 168 End of Study Final Study Results (AASLD 2010) *From WK24 on, patients with confirmed HBV DNA 69 IU/mL had the option to add FTC (as fixed dose ) or discontinue from the trial TDF and achieved viral suppression in 81% of patients at WK48 1, and in 89% (TDF) and 83% () at WK96 2

Patient Disposition at 168 Weeks N=105 Randomized and Treated N=53 TDF N=52 Discontinued = 15 (7 TDF*, 8 ) Added FTC (OL fixed dose ) = 25 16 blinded TDF to OL 9 blinded to OL N=46 (35 blinded, 11 OL) Completed Week 168 N=44 (39 blinded, 5 OL) Completed Week 168 *One patient discontinued study due to HBsAg loss.

Baseline Disease and Demographic Characteristics TDF (N=53) (N=52) Mean Age 40 39 Race White Asian 23 (44%) 26 (49%) 21 (40%) 18 (35%) Male 38 (72%) 42 (81%) HBeAg Positive 38 (72%) 39 (75%) Mean HBV DNA (log 10 copies/ml) (range) 6.06 (3.41,9.57) 5.87 (2.23,9.47) ALT > ULN 27 (51%) 26 (50%) Prior LAM exposure ( 12 weeks) 30 (57%) 31 (60%) Mean prior ADV exposure (weeks; range) 62 (20-131) 62 (29-168) HBV Viral Genotype A B C D E 11 (21%) 6 (11%) 15 (28%) 18 (34%) 2 (4%) 9 (18%) 4 (8%) 10 (20%) 21 (41%) 6 (12%)

Primary Efficacy Analysis: Comparison of the Two Treatment Strategies % of Patients with HBV DNA < 400 copies/ml (69 IU/mL) 100 90 80 82% 82% TDF Percentage (%) 70 60 50 40 ITT: NC=F* 30 20 10 0 0 4 8 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 132 144 156 168 Weeks on Study Treatment TDF Proportion of patients with HBV DNA < 169 copies/ml (29IU/mL): 80% TDF and 76%

Mean HBV DNA (log 10 c/ml) by Study Visit 7 Mean (95% CI) HBV DNA (Log 10 Copies/mL) 6 5 4 3 2 LLOQ Treatment TDF 2.26 TDF 2.24 1 0 4 8 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 132 144 156 168 Weeks on Study * Includes patients who switched to open-label fixed-dose combination

Week 168 Serology Results* TDF Proportion with HBeAg loss 8/38 (21%) 9/39 (23%) Proportion with HBeAg seroconversion (a subset of HBeAg loss group) 5/38 (13%) 5/39 (13%) Proportion with HBsAg loss 3/53 (6%) 0 Proportion with HBsAg seroconversion 3/53 (6%) 0 *Last Observation Carried Forward (LOCF) analysis Patients who lost HBsAg/seroconverted: Pt 3024: Asian male, HBeAg+ patient (from US site) with HBV genotype C Pt 1006: Caucasian female, HBeAg+ patient (German site) with HBV genotype A Pt 1036: Caucasian male, HBeAg+ patient (German site) with HBV genotype A All remained on treatment for ~6 additional months and 2 patients were followed off treatment, without evidence of relapse.

Baseline Genotypic Analysis Patient Population N All Enrolled 105 Patients with ADV-Resistance Mutations at Baseline 10 (9.5%) rta181v 2 rtn236t 2 rta181t/v + rtn236t 4 rta181t 2 Patients with LAM-Resistance Mutations at Baseline 13 (12.4%) rtm204v/i 1 rtl180m+rtm204v/i 12 All patients with Mutations at Baseline 23 (22%) * population sequencing

Mean HBV DNA (Log 10 c/ml) by Baseline ADV-R and Treatment 9 8 ADV Res TDF Not ADV Res TDF Treatment ADV Res Not ADV Res Mean HBV DNA (Log 10 Copies/mL) 7 6 5 4 3 2 LLOQ 1 0 4 8 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 132 144 156 168 Weeks on Study Not ADV Res N= 50 50 48 50 50 48 48 48 46 44 45 43 42 41 42 42 40 Not ADV Res TDF N= 45 45 43 44 44 44 44 43 42 42 42 40 40 38 37 34 36 ADV Res N= 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 ADV Res TDF N= 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 7 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

Mean HBV DNA (Log 10 c/ml) by Baseline LAM-R and Treatment 8 Treatment Mean HBV DNA (Log 10 Copies/mL) 7 6 5 4 3 2 LLOQ LAM ResTDF Not LAM Res TDF LAM Res Not LAM Res 1 0 4 8 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 132 144 156 168 Weeks on Study Not Lam Res N= 46 46 44 46 46 44 44 44 42 40 41 39 38 37 38 38 36 Not Lam Res TDF N= 46 46 44 45 45 45 45 44 43 42 43 41 41 39 38 35 37 Lam Res N= 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 Lam Res TDF N= 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 7 Gilead Confidential

Virology Analysis Plan for Study 106 Genotyping (HBV pol / RT) All patients: at baseline yearly if 400 copies/ml ( 69 IU/mL) of HBV DNA before switch to OL, and after discontinuation of any therapy if HBV DNA 400 copies/ml Phenotyping (HBV pol / RT) Any patient post-baseline with: conserved site changes in pol/rt virologic breakthrough a polymorphic site changes (>1 patient) a. Defined as a confirmed 1log 10 increase in HBV DNA and/or confirmed HBV DNA 400cp/ml after having <400 cp/ml

Resistance Surveillance No HBV pol/rt amino acid substitutions associated with tenofovir resistance were detected through 168 weeks of TDF or therapy No 2 patients had the same polymorphic site change and the observed conserved site changes were transient

Proportion <400 copies/ml by Treatment Group (On-Treatment) Randomized and Treated N=105 TDF N=53 N=52 Switch to OL (n=16) Switch to OL (n=9) DC (n=5) DC (n=2) DC (n=4) DC (n=4) OL 9/11=82% <400 copies/ml TDF* 33/33=100% <400 copies/ml * 37/37=100% <400 copies/ml OL 5/5=100% <400 copies/ml Week 168 *On-treatment HBV DNA data not available for 4 patients at WK 168; final on-treatment HBV DNA <400 c/ml

Summary of Safety Data TDF (N=53) (N=52) Adverse Event, Patients with Grade 3 or 4 AE 1 (2%) 4 (8%) SAE (one considered related to study drug: ALT flare*) 6 (11%) 10 (19%) AE that resulted in DC 0 0 Death (Pulmonary cancer with osseous metastasis) 0 1 (2%) Laboratory Abnormalities, Patients with Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormality 10 (19%) 12 (23%) Grade 4 ALT (>10 x ULN) and > 2 x Baseline* 0 2 ( 4%) Confirmed 0.5 mg/dl increase in creatinine 0 0 Confirmed CrCl decline to <50mL/min 0 0 Confirmed serum phosphorus < 2mg/dL 0 0 *on-treatment ALT flare; 1 additional patient had an off-treatment ALT flare

Conclusions Both treatment strategies (TDF monotherapy with option to switch to combination, or initial combination of ) were equivalent through 168 weeks in this heavily pretreated, highly viremic population In patients with persistent viremia on ADV (most with prior/current use of LAM) viral suppression was achieved and maintained through Week 168 in the majority (consistent with results observed at Weeks 48 and 96): 82% (TDF) and 82% () Virologic response was independent of pre-existing ADVor LAM-associated mutations

Acknowledgements Participating Centers France Germany Spain United States Marc Bourliere Paul Cales Francois Haberset Patrick Marcellin Philippe Mathurin Ghassan Riachi Christain Trepo Thomas Berg Marion Ganslma Guido Gerken Heinz Hartmann Michael Manns Bernd Moeller Joerg Petersen Ulrich Spengler Reinhart Zachoval Stefan Zeuzem Emilio Suarez Sing Chan Christine Cheng Bob Gish Hie-Wan Hann Ira Jacobson Henry Pollack Vinod K. Rustgi Michael Ryan Arun Sanyal Huy Trinh

Back UP

Response by Treatment Strategy (HBV DNA <400 copies/ml [69 IU/mL]) by Resistance Mutations* at Baseline Time on Treatment HBV DNA < 400 copies/ml ADV-resistance HBV DNA < 400 copies/ml LAM-resistance TDF TDF Week 48 (NC=F) 7/8 (88%) 1/2 (50%) 6/7 (86%) 6/6 (100%) Week 96 (NC=F) 7/8 (88%) 2/2 (100%) 7/7 (100%) 6/6 (100%) Week 168 (NC=F) 7/8 (88%) 2/2 (100%) 7/7 (100%) 6/6 (100%) * Resistance as identified by population sequencing Gilead Confidential

Proportion with HBV DNA <400 copies/ml by Baseline HBV DNA & Randomized Treatment TDF (N=39) (N=39) TDF (N=14) (N=13) Baseline HBV DNA 10 7 c/ml 10 7 c/ml >10 7 c/ml >10 7 c/ml Week 24 31/39 (79%) 31/39 (79%) 4/13 (31%) 5/13 (39%) Week 48 36/39 (92%) 35/38 (92%) 7/13 (54%) 7/12 (58%) Week 96 38/38 (100%) 33/36 (92%) 9/12 (75%) 11/11 (100%) Week 144 34/34 (100%) 34/34 (100%) 11/11 (100%) 10/10 (100%) Week 168 33/33 (100%) 33/33 (100%) 9/11 (82%) 9/9 (100%)

Proportion of Patients with HBV DNA <400 copies/ml (On-Treatment) 100 90 80 70 Percentage (%) 60 50 40 30 20 10 Treatment TDF 0 0 4 8 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 132 144 156 168 Weeks on Study

Proportion of Patients with ALT Normalized* by Study Visit 100 90 Percentage (%) 80 70 60 50 40 68% TDF 67% 30 20 10 0 defined as ALT value at or below ULN for patients with baseline ALT above ULN. (ALT ULN=34 females and ULN=43 for males Treatment TDF 0 4 8 12 24 36 48 60 72 84 96 108 120 132 144 156 168 Weeks on Study ITT: NC=F