Evolution of Patient Navigation

Similar documents
The Origin, Evolution & Principles of Patient Navigation

The History and Principles of Patient Navigation. Report to the Nation on Cancer and the Poor

The Current Landscape of Nurse Navigators: Oncology and the Impact on Outcomes

Broward Health s Breast Cancer Navigation Program Meeting the needs of underserved patients

Slide 1. Slide 2. Slide 3 History of Nurse Navigator

Chapter 2 Models of Patient Navigation

RHODE ISLAND CANCER PREVENTION AND CONTROL

Role of Patient Navigation and A Team Approach to Coordinated Care June 13, 2016

2012 AAHPM & HPNA Annual Assembly

American Cancer Society Progress Report. December 2016

National Plan to Address Alzheimer s Disease

Kelly D. Post RN, BSN, OCN Gastrointestinal Nurse Navigator Advocate Christ Medical Center, Cancer Institute April 5, 2014

GI NAVIGATORS Helping Patients In Rough Waters

Patient Navigation Research Program (PNRP) Evaluation Design and Implementation

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed cancer. Patient Navigation to Improve Follow-Up of Abnormal Mammograms Among Disadvantaged Women

Repairing the Disconnect: Optimizing Cancer Care Delivery in an Emerging Health Care System. Tracy A Battaglia MD MPH March 20, 2013

Module 6: Substance Use

SUSAN G. KOMEN ST. LOUIS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Taussig Cancer Institute Community Outreach Efforts. Kimberly Kreller RN, BSN Director Community Outreach and Research

Community Benefit Strategic Implementation Plan. Better together.

Patient Navigation: An Update on the State of the Science


ACHIEVING HEALTH EQUITY IN LAKE COUNTY HOW DO WE GET THERE?

LIVESTRONG Patient Navigation Services Program (PNSP)

Patient Navigation to Promote Health Equity: The Case of Chicago

Measures of Success for Patient Navigation

Gastrointestinal Multidisciplinary Cancer (GI MDC) Navigation May 3, 2012

Addressing Gaps in MS Care. November 6, :00 AM - Noon

Electra D. Paskett, Ph.D. The Ohio State University Multi-level Approaches to Addressing Cancer Disparities

Caring for Survivors. Nancy Houlihan, RN, MA, AOCN. Cancer Survivorship Program

Breaking Down the Problem: Physician Perspectives

Georgia Cancer Quality Information Exchange

Minnesota Adult Immunization Initiatives

Index. Note: Page numbers of article titles are in boldface type.

Executive Summary. Introduction to the Community Profile Report

THE TEXAS CANCER PLAN KAREN TORGES CHAIR, CANCER ALLIANCE OF TEXAS

The Dietitian as Head & Neck Navigator

Cancer Action Coalition of Virginia Report to the Governor, General Assembly, and the Joint Commission on Health Care.

NCI-designated Cancer Centers & Colorectal Cancer Screening

Cancer Health Disparities Research Leading to Elimination

Community Health Advisors- Utilizing Lay Navigators. Michael Bertram, PhD, MBA Associate Director for Administration

SICKLE CELL DISEASE TREATMENT DEMONSTRATION PROGRAM. CONGRESSIONAL REPORT Executive Summary

SUSAN G. KOMEN GREATER ATLANTA EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Assessing the successes and challenges of recruiting insured women for patient navigation services in the Maryland Breast and Cervical Cancer Program

Sustain and Seize Cancer Research Opportunities

The Affordable Care Act and HIV/AIDS: Implications for Coverage, Access to Care, and Payment

HEALTH DISPARITIES AMONG ADULTS IN OHIO

Program Summary. The CT Early Detection and Prevention Program

The 2011 IOM Reports on Oral Health: Implications for Delivery Systems

American Diabetes Association 2017 Advocacy Priorities LaShawn McIver, MD, MPH Friday, February 17, :30 p.m. 5:15 p.m.

Community Health Improvement Plan

Beyond Being Lost In Transition: Reviewing the History and Progress in Cancer Survivorship Care

COMMUNITY PROFILE REPORT. Susan G. Komen for the Cure Greater Cincinnati Affiliate

INSTITUTE OF MEDICINE

Addressing Health Disparities to Improve the Care of African-American Women Affected by Breast Cancer

Health Inequity and Controversies in Cancer Screening. Doris Browne, MD, MPH Immediate Past President, NMA September

Mobile Mammography and Lay Navigation: Successes and Challenges

Evaluations. Cancer Clinical Trials: What the Primary Care and Public Health Provider Need to Know. Conflict of Interest Statement.

SUSAN G. KOMEN NORTH TEXAS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Ensuring the Delivery of Patient-Centered Cancer Care

Health Systems Analysis Data Sources

Shaping our future: a call to action to tackle the diabetes epidemic and reduce its economic impact

Cancer Screenings and Community Outreach Report The University of Toledo Medical Center Cancer Committee 2017

Appendix A Gerontology Core Competencies

Institute of Medicine: The Future Health Care Workforce for Older Americans -- Dentistry

Southcoast Health Cancer Program. 2016/2017 Annual Report

AMERICA S HEALTH CARE SAFETY NET

Columbia St. Mary s Mission Mission Page 3. Community Health Improvement Program Philosophy Page 4

CARIBBEAN CANCER NETWORK THE BELIZE CANCER SOCIETY S PERSPECTIVE CERVICAL CANCER ADVOCACY WORKSHOP ST. MAARTEN MARCH 22, 2013.

Bristol-Myers Squibb Foundation: Supporting Sustainable Innovations in Health Equity. Patricia M. Doykos, PhD Director

THE ROLE OF THE CLINICAL CARE TEAM IN COLORECTAL CANCER SCREENING

Clinical Trials in Prostate Cancer: To do or not To Do?

Health Resource Review - Section 2.4

Facts & Resources: Cancer Health Disparities

Winnable Battles: Cancer in Colorado. Joni Reynolds, RN-CNS, MSN Director of Public Health Programs

Native American Breast and Cervical Cancer Education and Recruitment Project Wyoming Breast & Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program

HHSC LAR Request. Substance Abuse Disorder Coalition. Contact Person: Will Francis Members:

Oral Health Care in California: State of the State. Dissemination Workshop August 4,2011

Structured Guidance for Postpartum Retention in HIV Care

Impact of Poor Healthcare Services

2018 First Edition. NEWSCLiPs. An Update for Cancer Liaison Physicians from the Commission on Cancer of the American College of Surgeons

Partnering with the Community to Build Sustainability: the Detroit CNP

Delaware Oral Health Plan 2014 Goals and Objectives VISION

Community-Campus Partnerships & Community Health Worker Initiatives

OVAC FY 2017 Appropriations Requests

COMMUNITY BENEFIT REPORT 2017

Ensure Equality of Access to Treatments for All Cancer Patients

Facts and Resources: Pediatric Cancer Survivorship

Enhancing Quality of Life for Cancer Survivors in South Dakota. Outcomes from the South Dakota Cancer Survivorship Program

Samantha A. Carlson, LMSW OSW-C Director of Social Services Kalamazoo, MI

KAISER PERMANENTE OF GEORGIA COMMUNITY BENEFIT REPORT

BRINGING ONCOLOGY SPECIALTY CARE TO THE COMMUNITY USING NURSING NAVIGATION

2017 ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE FACTS AND FIGURES

DAUPHIN. Harrisburg Community Cancer Network

2016 Oncology Institute Annual Report

A REVIEW OF NATIONAL CANCER CONTROL PLAN.? PROPOSALS FOR

TABLE OF CONTENTS. Southwest Region Community Profile Report

State of Rhode Island. Medicaid Dental Review. October 2010

62 accc-cancer.org January February 2016 OI

Colorectal Cancer- QI process and clinic success: A Case Study at Atascosa Health Center

Transcription:

Evolution of Patient Navigation Adirondack Health Institute 7 th Annual Summit September 24, 2015 Lake Placid, NY Harold P Freeman, M.D. Founder & President, Harold P. Freeman Patient Navigation Institute

Patient Navigation Model Outreach Patient Navigation Rehabilitation Abnormal Finding Diagnosis Treatment Freeman, et.al., Cancer Practice, 1995.

Patient Navigation Across The Health Care Continuum Patient Navigation Initial target in Harlem Model Outreach Abnormal Results Diagnosis Treatment Survivorship Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis/ Incidence Treatment Post Treatment/ Quality of Life Freeman, 2006.

Phases of Patient Navigation Outreach: The outreach navigator is responsible for creating access to the Center. This individual utilizes remote access technology to create real time appointments in the scheduling management system and tracks potential patients through their scheduled appointment. Financial: The financial navigator is responsible for removing any financial barriers or obstacles faced by patients. Diagnostic: The diagnostic navigator is responsible for removing barriers to timely diagnosis. Treatment: The treatment navigator is responsible for removing barriers to timely treatment.

The Principles of Patient Navigation Navigation is a patient-centric health care service delivery model. The core function of navigation is the elimination of barriers to timely care across all segments of the health care continuum. Patient navigation serves to virtually integrate a fragmented healthcare system for the individual patient.

The Principles of Patient Navigation Patient Navigation should be defined with a clear scope of practice that distinguishes the role and responsibilities of the navigator from that of all other providers. Navigators should be integrated into the health care team in such a way that there is maximum benefit for the individual patient Delivery of navigation services should be cost effective and commensurate with the training and skills necessary to navigate a individual through a particular phase of the care continuum

The Principles of Patient Navigation The determination of who should navigate should be be related to the level of skills required by the level of skills required at a given phase of navigation. There is a need in a given system of care to define the point at which navigation begins and the point at which navigation ends

The Principles of Patient Navigation There is a need to navigate patients across disconnected systems of care such as primary care site and tertiary care sites Patient navigation can serve as the process that connects disconnected health care systems. Navigation systems require coordination. In larger systems of patient care this coordination is best carried out by assigning a navigation coordinator or champion who is responsible for overseeing all phases of navigation activity within a given health care site.

Three Major Factors to Improve Results Provide screening to patients regardless of ability to pay Establish patient navigation program Increase outreach and public education

Funding for Patient Navigation NCI 9 Demonstration Sites CMS 6 Demonstration Sites Health Resources and Services Administration 6 Demonstration Sites American Cancer Society

Funding for Patient Navigation Susan Komen Foundation Avon Foundation Pfizer Foundation Amgen Foundation

National Legislation authorizing Patient Navigation Program Signed into law June 29, 2005 "Patient Navigator Outreach and Chronic Disease Prevention Act of 2005" P.L. 109-18

American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer Cancer Program Standards 2012: Standard 3.1 American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer mandated that Patient Navigation is to be a standard of care to be met by cancer programs seeking approval beginning 2015

Affordable Care Act: 2010 The ACA requires that states utilize patient navigators to facilitate access to health insurance coverage for uninsured individuals.

Patient Navigation Impact on Clinical Outcomes Research Findings

Major Research Finding: A 2011 review of the literature on patient navigation showed that patient navigation improves participation in cancer screening particularly in vulnerable populations Paskett E, CA Cancer J Clin 2011

National Cancer Institute Patient Navigation Research Program (PNRP) Research Findings

Major Research Finding: The weight of evidence from the NCI PNRP indicates Patient Navigation can reduce the time from abnormal finding to diagnosis in breast, cervix, colorectal, and prostate cancer. NCI Patient Navigator Research Program, 2012

NCI PNRP Study: Patient Navigation Improves Cancer Diagnostic Resolution: An Individually Randomized Clinical Trail in an Underserved Population Conclusions: Patient Navigation positively impacts time to resolution of abnormal screening tests for breast, colorectal and prostate cancers in a medically underserved population Raich P. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; October 2012

NCI PNRP Study: Boston Patient Navigation Program: Impact of Navigation on Time to Diagnostic Resolution after Abnormal Cancer Screening Conclusion: This study documents a benefit of patient on time to diagnosis in a racially/ethnically diverse inner city population. Battaglia, T. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev, October 2012

NCI PNRP Study: Patient Navigation Significantly Reduces Delays in Breast Cancer Diagnosis in the District of Columbia Conclusion: Navigated women, especially those requiring biopsy, reached their diagnostic resolution significantly faster than non-navigated women. Hoffman J. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; October 2012

NCI PNRP Study: The Ohio Patient Navigation Research Program: Does Patient Navigation (ACS Model) Improves Time to Resolution in Patients with Abnormal Screening Tests? Conclusions: Participants with abnormal screening tests or symptoms resolved faster if assigned to patient navigators. Paskett, E. Cancer Epidemiol Biomkers Prev. October 2012

NCI PNRP Study: Follow-up and Timeliness After an Abnormal Cancer Screening Among Underserved, Urban Women in a Patient Navigation Program. Conclusions: Patient navigation reduces time from abnormal cancer findings to definitive diagnosis in underserved women. Markossian T. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; October 2012

The position regarding Patient Navigation of the Oncology Nursing Society, the Association of Oncology Social Work, and the National Association of Social Workers

Patient navigation processes, whether provided on-site or in coordination with local agencies or facilities, are essential components of cancer care services. Patient outcomes are optimal when social worker, nurse and lay navigator function as multidisciplinary team. Ongoing collaboration to identify and/or derive metrics that can be used to clarify the role, function and desired outcomes of navigators must be supported and promoted.

Patient Navigation programs in cancer care must address underserved populations in the community. Patient navigation programs must lay the groundwork for their sustainability. Navigation services can be delegated to trained nonprofessional and/or volunteers and should be supervised by nurse or social workers.

Nurses and social workers in oncology who function in patient navigator roles do so based on the scope of practice for each discipline. Educational preparation and professional certification play roles in regulating the practice of both disciplines. Nationally recognized standards of practice specific to the discipline and specialty also define safe and effective practice.

Nurses and social workers in oncology who perform navigator services should have education and knowledge in community assessment, cancer program assessment, resolution of system barriers, the cancer continuum, cancer health disparities, cultural competence, and the individualized provision of assistance to patient with cancer, their families, caregiver and survivors at risk.

Additional research to explore, confirm, and advance patient navigation processes, roles and identification of appropriate evidence-based outcomes measures must be supported.

Final Thoughts

The Discovery-Delivery Disconnect Discovery Delivery Critical Disconnect This discovery to delivery disconnect is a key determinant of the unequal burden of cancer. Voices of a Broken System: Real People, Real Problems, President s Cancer Panel, Freeman, September 2001

Patient Navigation Historical Time Table 1989 National Hearings on Cancer in the Poor 1989 Cancer in the Socioeconomically Disadvantaged, J. Cancer. 1989 Freeman HP 1990 Patient Navigator Program initiated at Harlem Hospital 1995 Expanding Access to Cancer Screening and Clinical Follow-up Among the Medically Underserved, J. Cancer Practice. 1995 Freeman HP 2004 National Cancer Institute funded 9 demonstration sites

2012 Patient Navigation Assistance Act introduced into Congress Patient Navigation Historical Time Table 2005 Patient Navigator Outreach and Chronic Disease Prevention Act 2006 Center for Medicare and Medicaid funded 6 demonstration sites 2008 2010 Health Resources and Services Administration funded 6 demonstration sites (under the Patient Navigation Act) Affordable Care Act Requires that the State utilize Patient Navigators to facilitate access to health insurance coverage for uninsured individuals. 2012 American College of Surgeons, Commission on Cancer mandates that patient navigation is a standard of care for cancer center approval

No person in America with cancer should go untreated. No person in America should experience delays in diagnosis and treatment that jeopardize survival. No person in America should be bankrupted by a diagnosis of cancer.

The unequal burden of disease in our society is a challenge to science and a moral dilemma for our nation.

Causes of Health Disparities Poverty/ Low Economic Status Social Injustice Culture Possible Influence on Gene Environment Interaction Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis/ Incidence Treatment Post Treatment/ Quality of Life Survival and Mortality Freeman, Adapted from Cancer Epidemiology Biomarkers & Prevention, April 2003

POVERTY CULTURE Inadequate physical and social environment Inadequate information and knowledge Risk-promoting lifestyle, attitude, behavior Diminished access to health care DECREASED SURVIVAL Freeman, H.P., Cancer in the socioeconomically disadvantaged. Cancer 1989

Patient Navigation across the Health Care Continuum Patient Navigation Outreach Abnormal Results Diagnosis Treatment Survivorship Initial target in Harlem Model Prevention Early Detection Diagnosis/ Incidence Treatment Post Treatment/ Quality of Life Freeman, 2006.