FAQs- Janet s Inbox. Janet Brunner, PA-C Wed. Feb. 26, 2014 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 1.

Similar documents
MYE FORMS REVEALED RESPONSE CODES OBJECTIVES. Stringent Complete Response (scr) Complete Response (CR) I have no conflicts of interest to disclose

Tracking Disease Status for Multiple Myeloma

Plasma Cell Disorders (PCD) Pre-HCT Data

Instructions for Plasma Cell Disorders (PCD) Post-HCT Data (Form 2116 Revision 3)

2016: Plasma Cell Disorders Pre-HCT Data

Management of Multiple Myeloma: The Changing Paradigm

Forms Revision: Myeloma Changes

SWOG ONCOLOGY RESEARCH PROFESSIONAL (ORP) MANUAL RESPONSE ASSESSMENT MYELOMA CHAPTER 11C REVISED: SEPTEMBER 2016

International Myeloma Foundation Patient and Family Seminar

Appendix 6: Indications for adult allogeneic bone marrow transplant in New Zealand

Myeloma Support Group: Now and the Horizon. Brian McClune, DO

Management of Multiple Myeloma: The Changing Paradigm

M-Protien, what to do next? Ismail A Sharif MD, FRCPc Internal Medicine Day 22 nd April 2016

Case 1: Mrs. MG. ANCO Hematologic Malignancies Update: Acute leukemias, MDS and myeloma

Managing Myeloma Virtual Grand Rounds Newly Diagnosed, Transplant Eligible Patient. Case Study

If unqualified, Complete remission is considered to be Haematological complete remission

If unqualified, Complete remission is considered to be Haematological complete remission

Major Diagnostic Criteria

Comparing outcome between Belgian haematopoietic stem cell transplant centres

Criteria for Disease Assessment Joan Bladé

Role of Maintenance and Consolidation Therapy in Multiple Myeloma: A Patient-centered Approach

UPDATE Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation for Lymphoma and Myeloma

Change Summary - Form 2018 (R3) 1 of 12

An Introduction to Bone Marrow Transplant

LONDON CANCER NEWS DRUGS GROUP RAPID REVIEW

Induction Therapy & Stem Cell Transplantation for Myeloma

Introduction to Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Myeloma: Are We on the Brink of a Cure? Jeffrey Wolf, MD Director, Myeloma Program University of California, San Francisco

Citation for published version (APA): Hovenga, S. (2007). Clinical and biological aspects of Multiple Myeloma s.n.

Smoldering Myeloma: Leave them alone!

I Need Treatment First-Line WM Treatments & Side Effects IWMF Educational Forum Grapevine, TX 5/1/2015

Adult Acute leukemia. Matthew Seftel. August

Treatment of Relapsed. A Case Study

Curing Myeloma So Close and Yet So Far! Luciano J. Costa, MD, PhD Associate Professor of Medicine University of Alabama at Birmingham

Clinical Case Study Discussion: Maintenance in MM

Acute Lymphoblastic and Myeloid Leukemia

Lymphoma John P. Leonard, M.D.

Sheena Surindran Grand Rounds 2/15/11

Multiple Myeloma Updates 2007

Understanding your diagnosis. Dr Graham Collins Consultant Haemtologist Oxford University Hospitals

Hematology 101. Rachid Baz, M.D. 5/16/2014

Serum Free Light Chains should be the target of response evaluation in light chain myeloma rather than urines: results from the IFM 2009 trial

Dr. A. Van Hoof Hematology A.Z. St.Jan, Brugge. ASH 2012 Atlanta

Blood Cancers. Blood Cells. Blood Cancers: Progress and Promise. Bone Marrow and Blood. Lymph Nodes and Spleen

EXPERIMENTAL AND THERAPEUTIC MEDICINE 9: , 2015

Choosing upfront and salvage therapy for myeloma in the ASEAN context

Recommended Timing for Transplant Consultation

Instructions for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Post-HSCT Data (Form 2113)

Is Transplant a Necessity or a Choice: Focus on the necessity for CR and MRD

Lymphomas and multiple myeloma 12/23/2018 1

WHO Classification. B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small T-cell granular lymphocytic leukemia

Multiple Myeloma: Induction, Consolidation and Maintenance Therapy

Laboratory Examination

Experience with bortezomib (Velcade) in multiple myeloma. Peter Černelč Clinical center Ljubljana Department of Haematology

Form 2011 R4.0: Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (ALL) Pre-HCT Data

7 Recruiting Carfilzomib, Rituximab and Dexamethasone in Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia Condition: Waldenstrom's Macroglobulinemia

Role of Stem Cell Transplantation in Multiple Myeloma: The Changing Landscape

Blood Cancers in the Community

Management Update: Multiple Myeloma. Presented by Prof. Dr. Khan Abul Kalam Azad Professor of Medicine Dhaka Medical College

Causes of Death. J. Douglas Rizzo, MD MS February, New11_1.ppt

Hematology Case Conference 8/5/03

Checkpoint Blockade in Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation

a resource for physicians Recommended Referral Timing for Stem Cell Transplant Evaluation

Role of consolidation therapy in Multiple Myeloma. Pieter Sonneveld. Erasmus MC Cancer Institute Rotterdam The Netherlands

Samples Available for Recipient Only. Samples Available for Recipient and Donor

Med A form: discussion forum

Myelodysplasia/Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MDS/MPN) Post-HCT Data

KEY WORDS: Multiple myeloma, Complete remission, Prognostic factor, Overall survival, Autologous stem cell transplantation

Bortezomib (Velcade)

Samples Available for Recipient Only. Samples Available for Recipient and Donor

Samples Available for Recipient and Donor

Multiple Myeloma 101: Understanding Your Labs

Review of Stem Cell Collection Data 2016 Ronan Foley, Professor, Director Stem Cell Laboratory, McMaster University

Dr.PSRK.Sastry MD, ECMO

New Evidence reports on presentations given at EHA/ICML Bendamustine in the Treatment of Lymphoproliferative Disorders

Stem cell transplantation for patients with AML in Republic of Macedonia: - 15 years of experience -

HEMATOLOGIC MALIGNANCIES BIOLOGY

Bone Marrow Transplantation in Myelodysplastic Syndromes. An overview for the Myelodysplasia Support Group of Ottawa

2013 AAIM Pathology Workshop

MED B Form CLL. Johannes Schetelig. London 09/April/

Kamakshi V Rao, PharmD, BCOP, FASHP University of North Carolina Medical Center UPDATE IN REFRACTORY HODGKIN LYMPHOMA

Post Transplant Maintenance- for everyone? Disclosures

Junru Liu*, Juan Li*, Beihui Huang, Dong Zheng, Mei Chen, Zhenhai Zhou, Duorong Xu, Waiyi Zou

CONSIDERATIONS IN DESIGNING ACUTE GVHD PREVENTION TRIALS: Patient Selection, Concomitant Treatments, Selecting and Assessing Endpoints

Supplementary Appendix

A.M.W. van Marion. H.M. Lokhorst. N.W.C.J. van de Donk. J.G. van den Tweel. Histopathology 2002, 41 (suppl 2):77-92 (modified)

Stem Cell Transplant for Myeloma: The New Landscape

Review of the recent publications from the French group of myeloma on urine vs serum FLC analysis in MM

Corporate Medical Policy

Hodgkin and Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (LYM) Post-Infusion Data

Aggressive NHL and Hodgkin Lymphoma. Dr. Carolyn Faught November 10, 2017

11/6/17 ANCO. Leena Rahmat, MD UCSF Clinical Fellow 11/4/17. Case 1

What s a Transplant? What s not?

Case #1. Robert J. Glinert, M.D. David C. Fisher, M.D. Dana Farber Cancer Institute

Velcade (bortezomib)

Refractory M ultiple Multiple M yeloma Myeloma

Neutrophil Recovery: The. Posttransplant Recovery. Bus11_1.ppt

Amyloidosis: What to do and how to diagnose: An Update 2017

5/21/2018. Disclosures. Objectives. Normal blood cells production. Bone marrow failure syndromes. Story of DNA

Dr Shankara Paneesha. ASH Highlights Department of Haematology & Stem cell Transplantation

Transcription:

FAQs- Janet s Inbox Janet Brunner, PA-C Wed. Feb. 26, 2014 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 1.

Disclosures I have no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 2.

Objectives 1. Determine myeloma disease status pre- and post-hct 2. Use correct baseline to determine disease status 3. Recognize & report the new NHL subtypes that have been added to the NHL/HL form TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 3.

Frequently Asked Questions Which disease has the most frequently asked questions? A. Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) B. Multiple Myeloma C. AML D. MDS TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 4.

Queries in 2013 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 MDS NHL AML/MDS - AML MM TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 5.

Multiple Myeloma 1) Disease status 2) Baseline to use to determine disease status At time of HCT At time points post- HCT 3) Oligoclonal bands post HCT TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 6.

How to Determine Disease Status Determine if disease is measurable at diagnosis: Serum M-protein >/= 1 g/dl and/or Urine M-protein >/= 200 mg/24 hours Free light chain levels may be used in place of the M- protein, provided the involved chain is >10 mg/dl & the κ/λ ratio is abnormal at diagnosis TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 7.

What Baseline to Use When Determining disease status at time of HCT No relapse or progression at any time between diagnosis and 1 st HCT: Use the disease parameters from diagnosis as the baseline. TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 8.

What Baseline to Use When Patient was treated for a relapse or progression in between diagnosis & 1 st HCT: Use the disease parameters obtained at the time of relapse or progression as the baseline (the baseline is reset to the time of the relapse or progression) TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 9.

What Baseline to Use When Determining disease response to HCT HCT planned as part of the initial therapy without a prior disease relapse or progression: Use disease parameters obtained at diagnosis TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 10.

What Baseline to Use When Determining best response to HCT Patient had a treated disease progression or relapse prior to HCT: Use disease parameters obtained at time of the relapse or progression TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 11.

What Baseline to Use When.. Patient has not received any therapy within 6 months of HCT or has an untreated relapse or progression Use the disease parameters obtained prior to the start of prep to determine best response to HCT. TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 12.

What Baseline to Use When.. Recipient undergoes a Tandem Transplant. Tandem transplants are considered part of one treatment plan. The baseline to use following the 2 nd HCT would be the same baseline used for the 1 st HCT provided there has not been a disease progression or relapse in between. TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 13.

What Baseline to Use When DS at time of HCT DS at time of HCT DS at time of HCT Disease response to HCT Disease response to HCT Disease response to HCT Initial Therapy No R/P Yes R/P (treated) Yes R/P (untreated) No R/P Yes R/P (treated) Yes R/P (untreated) DP at diagnosis DP at R/P DP prior to the start of prep DP at diagnosis DP at R/P DP prior to the start of prep DS = disease status R/P = relapse or progression, DP = disease parameters TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 14.

MYELOMA CASE STUDIES TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 15.

Case #1 A patient is diagnosed with IgG kappa myeloma. Serum M-spike = 6 g/dl (or 6000 mg/dl) 24-hr urine M-protein = 1000 mg/24 hrs Bone marrow biopsy- 40% plasma cells Patient treated with Velcade, Doxil & Dexamethasone x 4 cycles TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 16.

Case #1 Patient re-evaluated after the 4 th cycle of VDD. Serum M-spike = 2400 mg/dl Bone marrow aspirate- 15% plasma cells Disease status- PR Patient received Cytoxan for autologous stem cell mobilization. Labs were obtained immediately prior to the start of the prep regimen. Serum M-spike = 1600 mg/dl Bone marrow aspirate- 8% plasma cells TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 17.

Case #1 What is the patient s disease status immediately prior to the start of the preparative regimen? A) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) B) Partial Remission (PR) C) Stable Disease (SD) D) I don t know- not enough information provided to make determination TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 18.

Case #2 The recipient from Case #1 had their autologous HCT. Lab studies were obtained at 60 & 100 days post HCT. SPEP/UPEP are negative for an M-spike at Day 60 & 100 Serum & Urine Immunofixation are positive for IgG kappa at Day 60 & 100 Bone marrow biopsy <5% plasma cells at Day 100 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 19.

Case #2 What disease response would you report for this recipient at 100 days post-hsct? A) Partial Remission (PR) B) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) C) Near Complete Remission (ncr) D) Complete Remission (CR) TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 20.

Case #3 A 55 year old AA male is diagnosed with IgG lambda myeloma. Results of the initial work-up include: Serum M-spike = 4 g/dl (or 4000 mg/dl) 24-hr urine M-protein = 1000 mg/24 hr Bone marrow aspirate = 60% plasma cells Patient receives 2 cycles of Revlimid & Dex, then reevaluated: Serum M-spike = 2000 mg/dl 24-hr urine M-protein = 210 mg/24 hr TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 21.

Case #3 What is the patient s disease response after two cycles of Rev/Dex? A) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) B) Partial Remission (PR) C) Stable Disease (SD) TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 22.

Case #3 The patient s PR status was confirmed with a 2 nd measurement. The patient received two additional cycles of Rev/Dex & re-evaluated for disease response. Serum M-spike = 2900 mg/dl 24-hr urine M-protein = 600 mg/24 hr Bone marrow aspirate = 30% plasma cells TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 23.

Case #3 What is the patient s disease response after a total of 4 cycles of Rev/Dex? A) Very Good Partial Response (VGPR) B) Partial Response (PR) C) Stable Disease (SD) D) Progressive Disease (PD) TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 24.

Case #3 Patient is switched to Vincristine, Adriamycin & Decadron (VAD) and is re-evaluated after two cycles. Serum M-spike = 1400 mg/dl 24-hr urine M-protein = 190 mg/24 hr Bone marrow aspirate = 15% plasma cells The plan is to give IV Cytoxan mobilization. What is the patient s disease response to the 2 cycles of VAD? TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 25.

Case #3 The patient achieved a PR after two cycles of VAD. What studies were used as a baseline to make that determination? A) The studies obtained at diagnosis B) The studies obtained after first two cycles of Rev/Dex C) The studies obtained at time of progression TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 26.

Case #3 The patient has undergone their autologous PBSC HSCT & has been evaluated monthly for the 1 st three months post HSCT. Day +30 evaluation: Serum M-spike = 1000 mg/dl Serum immunofixation (+) for IgG lambda 24-hr urine M-protein = 190 mg/24 hrs Bone marrow biopsy = 7% plasma cells TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 27.

Case #3 Day +60 evaluation: SPEP/UPEP- no monoclonal band Serum/Urine immunofixation (+) for IgG lambda 24-hr urine for M-protein = 90 mg/24 hrs TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 28.

Case #3 Day +100 evaluation: SPEP/UPEP- no monoclonal band Serum/Urine immunofixation (+) for IgG lambda 24-hr urine for M-protein = 0 mg/24 hrs Bone marrow aspirate <5% plasma cells TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 29.

Case #3 What is the best disease response to HCT that you would report at Day +100 for this patient? A) Stable Disease (SD) B) Partial Remission (PR) C) Very Good Partial Remission (VGPR) D) Near Complete Remission (ncr) E) Complete Remission (CR) TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 30.

Oligoclonal Bands Post-HCT Did recipient s IgG became IgA? Can lambda change to kappa after HCT? Usually small, more than one M-spike occurring in the phase of recovery of immune function TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 31.

Oligoclonal Bands Post-HCT Original IgG kappa M spike 3.2 g/dl Day 100 after transplant: SPEP/SIFX: IgG Kappa 0.14 g/dl, free lambda and non-quantifiable IgA lambda TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 32.

Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Queries TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 33.

Richter s Transformation Occurs when CLL transforms into DLBCL Affects ~5% of all CLL patients at some point CLL DLBCL TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 34.

Lymphoma Sub-types B-cell NHL with features between DLBCL & Classical HL Now a recognized entity in the WHO classification Synonyms- Grey Zone Lymphoma Large B-cell NHL w/ Hodgkin features Most common in men ages 20-40 TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 35.

Lymphoma Sub-types B-cell lymphoma with features between DLBCL & Burkitt Used to classify cases not meeting criteria for DLBCL or classical Burkitt lymphoma Sometimes referred to as double hit NHL TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 36.

MDS vs. AML Queries TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 37.

MDS vs. AML- Case #1 Patient diagnosed in late 2008 with MDS (RAEB-1) Treated with Vidaza & achieved a CR BM biopsy in 2010 revealed 22% blasts c/w AML Treated with induction chemo. BM biopsy post induction chemo revealed <5% blasts, but still had evidence of myelodysplasia. Patient underwent an allo HCT instead of additional chemotherapy. TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 38.

MDS vs. AML- Case #1 What is the disease status to report at time of HCT? A. AML- 1 st remission B. AML- PIF C. MDS D. None of the above TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 39.

Once the caterpillar transforms into a butterfly, is it still a caterpillar? TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 40.

MDS vs. AML- Case #1 Remember.. Once a patient s disease has transformed from MDS to AML, the patient cannot be in remission if there s evidence of MDS. TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 41.

MDS vs. AML- Case #2 Patient diagnosed with AML in 2008 Achieved CR after induction therapy & received 4 cycles of HiDAC as consolidation therapy In 2013, patient complained of fatigue & bruising BM biopsy documented erythroid & megakaryocytic dysplasia with no increase in blasts. Abnormal karyotype with monosomy 7. The diagnosis was therapy related MDS Patient treated with Vidaza & achieved HI prior to their allo HCT. TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 42.

MDS vs. AML- Case #2 What should be reported as the primary diagnosis for HCT? A. MDS B. AML C. Other TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 43.

MDS vs. AML- Case #2 Remember The AML did not transform from MDS. The MDS was related to the chemotherapy the patient received to treat the AML. The primary disease to report for HCT is MDS. The prior AML should be reported on the Pre- TED (F2400) in Q134-135. TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 44.

Questions TRAINING & DEVELOPMENT 45.