Randomized Comparison of Prasugrel and Bivalirudin versus Clopidogrel and Heparin in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Similar documents
Vascular Closure Devices Versus Manual Compression After Femoral Artery Access

Abciximab plus Heparin versus Bivalirudin in Patients with NSTEMI Undergoing PCI. ISAR-REACT 4 Trial

ISAR-LEFT MAIN: A Randomized Clinical Trial on Drug-Eluting Stents for Unprotected Left Main Lesions

Supplementary Online Content

ISAR-LEFT MAIN 2 Randomized Trial. Zotarolimus- vs. Everolimus-Eluting Stents for Treatment of Unprotected Left Main Coronary Artery Lesions

Supplementary Material to Mayer et al. A comparative cohort study on personalised

Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients on Anticoagulation

APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATelet Inhibition and patient Outcomes trial

Supplementary Table S1: Proportion of missing values presents in the original dataset

Six Versus Twelve Months of Clopidogrel Therapy A;er Drug- Elu?ng Sten?ng

Impact of coronary atherosclerotic burden on clinical presentation and prognosis of patients with coronary artery disease

A Polymer-Free Dual Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients with Coronary Artery Disease: Randomized Trial Versus Polymer-Based DES.

Ticagrelor compared with clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndromes the PLATO trial

Bivalirudin should be indicated for all patients with STEMI. Adnan Kastrati Deutsches Herzzentrum, Munich, Germany

What oral antiplatelet therapy would you choose? a) ASA alone b) ASA + Clopidogrel c) ASA + Prasugrel d) ASA + Ticagrelor

Lessons learned From The National PCI Registry

Adjunctive Antithrombotic for PCI. SCAI Fellows Course December 9, 2013

2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Komplexe Koronarintervention heute: Von Syntax zu bioresorbierbaren Stents

1. Whether the risks of stent thrombosis (ST) and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) differ from BMS and DES

Continuing Medical Education Post-Test

OUTPATIENT ANTITHROMBOTIC MANAGEMENT POST NON-ST ELEVATION ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. TARGET AUDIENCE: All Canadian health care professionals.

Optimal antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy for patients treated in STEMI network

Polymer-Free Stent CX - ISAR

Triple Therapy: A review of the evidence in acute coronary syndrome. Stephanie Kling, PharmD, BCPS Sanford Health

TICAGRELOR VERSUS CLOPIDOGREL AFTER THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN PATIENTS WITH ST- ELEVATION MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION: A RANDOMIZED CLINICAL TRIAL

FACTOR Xa AND PAR-1 BLOCKER : ATLAS-2, APPRAISE-2 & TRACER TRIALS

bivalirudin 250mg powder for concentrate for solution for injection or infusion (Angiox) SMC No. (638/10) The Medicines Company

Which drug do you prefer for stable CAD? - P2Y12 inhibitor

What is new in the Treatment of STEMI? Malcolm R. Bell, MBBS Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

Mild Hypothermia in Cardiogenic Shock Complicating Myocardial Infarction the Randomized SHOCK-COOL Trial

What is the Optimal Triple Anti-platelet Therapy Duration in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction Undergoing Drug-eluting Stents Implantation?

Bivalirudin Clinical Trials Update Evidence and Future Perspectives

Guideline for STEMI. Reperfusion at a PCI-Capable Hospital

Acute Coronary syndrome

A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Strategy in Patients with Non-ST Elevation ACS

Target vessel only revascularization versus complet revascularization in non culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI

How to approach non-infarct related artery disease in patients with STEMI in a limited resource setting

Ticagrelor vs Aspirin in Patients undergoing Coronary- Artery Bypass Grafting

Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) Initial Evaluation and Management

Acute Coronary Syndromes

Role of Clopidogrel in Acute Coronary Syndromes. Hossam Kandil,, MD. Professor of Cardiology Cairo University

Clopidogrel vs New Antiplatelet Therapy (Prasugrel) Adnan Kastrati, MD Deutsches Herzzentrum, Technische Universität München, Germany

Critical Review Form Therapy Objectives: Methods:

STEMI Presentation and Case Discussion. Case #1

JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY VOL. 68, NO. 21, 2016 ª 2016 BY THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY FOUNDATION

CPORT E Trial. Atlantic C PORT

Timing of Surgery After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

STEMI update. Vijay Krishnamoorthy M.D. Interventional Cardiology

Appendix: ACC/AHA and ESC practice guidelines

Myocardial Infarction In Dr.Yahya Kiwan

Updated and Guideline Based Treatment of Patients with STEMI

Learning Objectives. Epidemiology of Acute Coronary Syndrome

Intra-Procedural Stent Thrombosis

QUT Digital Repository:

Beta-blockers in Patients with Mid-range Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction after AMI Improved Clinical Outcomes

Scottish Medicines Consortium

Supplementary Table 1: Age, gender and treatment received in included studies

Ticagrelor vs prasugrel in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Controversies in Cardiac Pharmacology

Hyeon-Cheol Gwon, On the behalf of SMART-DATE trial investigators ACC LBCT 2018

Otamixaban for non-st-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome

Why and How Should We Switch Clopidogrel to Prasugrel?

Anti-platelet Therapies in Cardiovascular Disease: From Stable CAD to ACS and Afib!

Is the combination of antithrombotics and lowdose anticoagulants worthwhile in PAD The VOYAGER trial

STEMI AND MULTIVESSEL CORONARY DISEASE

Effect of upstream clopidogrel treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI

Stephan Windecker Department of Cardiology Swiss Cardiovascular Center and Clinical Trials Unit Bern Bern University Hospital, Switzerland

3/23/2017. Angelika Cyganska, PharmD Austin T. Wilson, MS, PharmD Candidate Europace Oct;14(10): Epub 2012 Aug 24.

PROMUS Element Experience In AMC

Prevention of Coronary Stent Thrombosis and Restenosis

Angelika Cyganska, PharmD Austin T. Wilson, MS, PharmD Candidate 2017

Medical Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome: The roles of a noncardiologist. Norbert Lingling D. Uy, MD Professor of Medicine UERMMMCI

Disclosures. Theodore A. Bass MD, FSCAI. The following relationships exist related to this presentation. None

A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines

ARMYDA-RECAPTURE (Atorvastatin for Reduction of MYocardial Damage during Angioplasty) trial

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Rescue PCI Versus a Conservative Approach for Failed Fibrinolysis in Patients with STEMI

A Randomized Trial Evaluating Clinically Significant Bleeding with Low-Dose Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin, in Addition to P2Y12 inhibition, in ACS

Safety-outcomes of bioresorbable Everolimus eluting scaffold in (German-Austrian-ABSORB RegIsteR)

KCS Congress: Impact through collaboration

Original Article. Keywords: Acute coronary syndromes (ACS); percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI); meta-analysis; systematic review; mortality

Adjunctive Antithrombotic for PCI. SCAI Fellows Course December 8, 2014

Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI Management A pharmacoinvasive approach

Prise en charge du SCA ST + en urgence. 9803mo01, 1

EXAMINATION trial. Manel Sabaté Hospital Clínic, Barcelona (On behalf of the Examination Investigators)

TCT mdbuyline.com Clinical Trial Results Summary

Supplementary Online Content

Quinn Capers, IV, MD

Disclosure. Financial disclosure: National Advisory Board & Research Grant from Boehringer-Ingelheim

INDIVIDUALIZED MEDICINE

Downloaded from:

NCDR CathPCI Registry v4.4 Diagnostic Catheterization and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Registry

Novel Anticoagulation Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndrome

Thrombus Aspiration in ST- Elevation myocardial infarction in Scandinavia (TASTE trial)

From STEMIs to Stents: Updates in PCI practice

Cindy Stephens, MSN, ANP Kelly Walker, MS, ACNP Peter Cohn, MD, FACC

The following is a transcript from a multimedia activity. Interactivity applies only when viewing the activity online.

Διάρκεια διπλής αντιαιμοπεταλιακής αγωγής. Νικόλαος Γ.Πατσουράκος Καρδιολόγος, Επιμελητής Α ΕΣΥ Τζάνειο Γενικό Νοσοκομείο Πειραιά

Transcription:

Randomized Comparison of Prasugrel and Bivalirudin versus Clopidogrel and Heparin in Patients with ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction The Bavarian Reperfusion Alternatives Evaluation (BRAVE) 4 Trial Gert Richardt, Adnan Kastrati, Karl-Ludwig Laugwitz, Tanja Morath, Ralph Tölg, Julia Neudecker, Tareq Ibrahim, Ilka Ott, Sebastian Kufner, Kathrin Anette Fiedler, Petra Hoppmann, Robert Byrne, Simon Schneider, Massimiliano Fusaro, Roxana Mehran, Anthony Gershlick, Heribert Schunkert, Julinda Mehilli, Stefanie Schulz Deutsches Herzzentrum München - Herzzentrum Bad Segeberg, Germany 1

Background I Primary PCI is the standard treatment for patients with STEMI. Adjunct antithrombotic therapy is the prerequisite for the safe and effective performance of primary PCI. 2

Background II No specifically designed studies have prospectively assessed the potential advantages of the combination of prasugrel plus bivalirudin with that of clopidogrel plus heparin. Theoretically, prasugrel and bivalirudin have synergistic effects on ischemic and bleeding complication that maximize patients` clinical outcome. 3

Objective to assess the hypothesis that in STEMI patients with planned primary PCI a strategy based on prasugrel plus bivalirudin is superior to a strategy based on clopidogrel plus unfractionated heparin in terms of net clinical outcome. 4

In- / Exclusion Criteria INCLUSION chest pain 20 minutes 24 hours from symptom onset ST-segment elevation 0.1 mv in 2 adjacent limb leads or 0.2 mv in 2 contiguous precordial leads or new left bundle branch block primary PCI planned informed consent EXCLUSION age < 18 years active bleeding or bleeding diathesis history of intracranial bleeding or structural abnormalities prior TIA or stroke refusal to receive blood transfusion heparin-induced thrombocytopenia administration of thrombolysis, bivalirudin, lowmolecular weight heparin or fondaparinux for the index myocardial infarction known allergy to the study medication hemoglobin < 100 g/l platelet count <100 x 10 9 cells/l use of coumadin derivatives within the last 7 days chronic therapy with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (except aspirin), cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, prasugrel or ticagrelor known severe liver disease glomerular filtration rate (GFR) <30 ml/min dialysis-dependent life expectancy < 1 year 5

Study Endpoints Primary endpoint Composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization of the infarct related artery (IRA), definite stent thrombosis, stroke, or major bleeding at 30 days Secondary endpoints Composite of all-cause death, recurrent myocardial infarction, definite stent thrombosis, unplanned IRArevascularization or stroke Major bleeding complications Cardiac death at 30 days after randomization 6

Study Details I BRAVE 4 is an investigator-initiated, randomized, openlabel, multicenter trial. Participating centers Deutsches Herzzentrum München in Munich Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar in Munich Herzzentrum, Segeberger Kliniken in Bad Segeberg 7

Study Details II Sample size calculation It was assumed that the incidence of the primary endpoint will be reduced from 12.1% with clopidogrel/heparin to 7.2% with prasugrel/bivalirudin. Power of 80, one-sided significance level of 2.5% Random sequence 1:1 Needed total number of patients in each group: 601 8

Study Details III Endpoint assessment Blinded core lab evaluation and blinded adjudication of endpoint events by specialized event adjudication committee members. Recruitment period Enrolment started September 2009 and was stopped December 2013 after 548 patients for slow recruitment. 9

Study Design open label n = 271 n = 277 n = 269 n = 275 10

Baseline Characteristics Prasugrel plus Bivalirudin n=271 Clopidogrel plus Heparin n=277 P Age, years 61.4 [51.9-71.7] 61.4 [52.9-71.5] 0.830 Female % 24 21 0.339 Hypertension % 66 64 0.662 Hypercholesterolemia % 57 51 0.191 Diabetes % 17 15 0.562 Smoker % 57 67 0.016 BMI, kg/m² 26.6 [24.4-29.3] 26.3 [24.3-29.4] 0.951 Prior MI % 8 11 0.214 Prior CABG % 2 3 0.585 - Infarct Localization % 0.516 Anterior 41 44 Posterior or Inferior 51 47 Lateral 7 9 - Arterial Blood Pressure Systolic, mmhg 130 [120-150] 130 [120-150] 0.949 Diastolic, mmhg 78 [70-85] 76 [66-84] 0.256 11

Angiographic Characteristic Prasugrel plus Bivalirudin n=271 Clopidogrel plus Heparin n=277 P Ejection Fraction, % 45 [39-55] 45 [38-51] 0.210 Multivessel Disease % 57.2 61.7 0.279 Infarct-Related Artery % 0.146 LAD 41.4 43.5 RCA 47.4 42.3 LCx 8.4 13.5 Left Main 1.6 0.4 Bypass Graft 1.2 0.4 Initial TIMI Flow Grade % 0.023 0 48.2 61.2 1 6.8 6.9 2 22.1 15.4 3 22.9 16.5 12

Procedural Characteristics Prasugrel plus Bivalirudin n=271 Clopidogrel plus Heparin n=277 P Intervention 0.184 Stent (%) 240 (88.6) 240 (86.6) 0.573 - Drug-Eluting Stent 223 228 - Bare Metal Stent 13 10 - Bioabsorbable Vascular Scaffold 4 2 Balloon Angioplasty % 2.2 5.8 CABG % 0.4 0.4 Conservative % 8.9 7.2 Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors % 3.0 6.1 0.074 Final TIMI Flow Grade % 0.594 0 1.6 2.3 1 0.8 1.9 2 7.2 5.8 3 90.4 90.0 13

Medication at Discharge Prasugrel plus Bivalirudin n=242 Clopidogrel plus Heparin n=254 P Acetylsalicylic acid % 99.6 96.9 0.022 Thienopyridine <0.001 Prasugrel % 94.6 7.1 Clopidogrel % 3.7 90.2 None % 1.7 2.8 Oral Anticoagulation % 5.0 9.1 0.075 Betablocker % 97.5 97.2 0.847 ACE-Inhibitor or AT1- Antagonist % 91.3 95.3 0.077 Diuretic % 48.3 54.3 0.183 Statin % 96.3 96.1 0.899 14

Primary Endpoint Composite of death, myocardial infarction, unplanned revascularization of the infarct-related artery, stent thrombosis, stroke or major bleeding 15

Secondary Ischemic Endpoint Composite of death, myocardial infarction, revascularization of the infarctrelated artery, stent thrombosis or stroke 16

Secondary Bleeding Endpoint non-cabg related bleeding (HORIZONS-AMI definition) 17

30d-Outcome - Individual Endpoints Prasugrel plus Bivalirudin n=269 Clopidogrel plus Heparin n=275 P Relative Risk [Confidence Interval] Secondary Endpoint: Bleeding According to HORIZONS- AMI Criteria % 14.1 12.0 0.543 1.18 [0.74, 1.88] Secondary Endpoint: Cardiac Death % 2.2 1.8 0.970 1.23 [0.32, 5.03] Death % Recurrent Myocardial Infarction % Unplanned IRA -Revascularization % 2.6 2.5 0.848 1.02 [0.31, 3.37] 1.5 1.5 0.799 1.02 [0.19, 5.44] 1.5 2.2 0.779 0.68 [0.14, 2.84] Stroke % 0.7 1.8 0.468 0.41 [0.04, 2.47] - Ischemic % 0.7 1.1 - Hemorrhagic % 0 0.7 Stent Thrombosis (definite) % 1.1 1.5 0.976 0.77 [0.11, 4.49] Bleeding According to TIMI Criteria: - TIMI Major % 2.6 2.9 0.966 0.89 [0.28, 2.78] - TIMI Minor % 9.3 7.3 0.484 1.28 [0.70, 2.37] - TIMI Major or Minor % 11.9 10.2 0.616 1.17 [0.70, 1.96] 18

Subgroup Analysis Thirty-day incidence and relative risk of the primary endpoint 19

Limitations The premature termination of the trial presents a major limitation. It reduced the actual power of the trial from 80% to 51%. The BRAVE 4 trial shares the limitation of an open-label design with previous trials of bivalirudin in STEMI patients. 20

Summary and Conclusions We were not able to demonstrate a difference in net clinical outcome between prasugrel plus bivalirudin and clopidogrel plus heparin in STEMI patients Neither the composite of ischemic complications nor bleeding were favorably affected by prasugrel plus bivalirudin The results, however, must be interpreted in view of the premature termination of the trial 21

Thank you! 22

Time Intervals Prasugrel plus Bivalirudin n=271 Clopidogrel plus Heparin n=277 P Symptom Onset to Admission, min 185 [95-430] 180 [90-527] 0.821 Symptom Onset to Randomisation, min 210 [116-465] 210 [115-560] 0.943 Symptom Onset to Balloon, min 270 [175-533] 281 [185-640] 0.594 Admission to Balloon, min 90 [66-110] 87 [67-114] 0.993 23

30d-Outcome Composite Endpoints Prasugrel plus Bivalirudin n=269 Clopidogrel plus Heparin n=275 P Relative Risk [Confidence Interval] Primary Endpoint: Composite of Death, Myocardial Infarction, Unplanned IRA-Revascularization, Stent Thrombosis, Stroke or Bleeding 42 (15.6) 40 (14.5) 0.680 1.09 [0, 1.79] Secondary Endpoint: Composite Ischemic Endpoint of Death, Myocardial Infarction, Unplanned IRA- Revascularization, Stent Thrombosis or Stroke 13 (4.8) 15 (5.5) 0.894 0.89 [0.40, 1.96] 24