Quality care. Everywhere? An audit of prostate cancer services in the UK

Similar documents
The Ovarian Cancer Postcode Lottery

The British Cardiovascular Society 2014 Workforce Survey. A report to the BCS October 2014

Principal Treatment Centres What do the data say for childhood cancer?

HCPC registered Psychologists in the UK

NHS ENGLAND BOARD PAPER

National Peer Review Report: Sarcoma Cancer Services Report 2012/2013

AMBASSADOR ROLES Keith Fraser, Trustee NATIONAL EMERGENCY SERVICES MEMORIAL, 25 FEBRUARY 2019

Compare your care. How asthma care in England matches up to standards R E S P I R AT O R Y S O C I E T Y U K

CRN SWP Business Intelligence Unit

SUMMARY: YEAR OLDS WITH CANCER IN ENGLAND: INCIDENCE, MORTALITY AND SURVIVAL (2018)

Northern Oesophago-Gastric Cancer Unit MDT meeting NECN Audit day 2012

National Peer Review Report: Brain and CNS Cancer Services Report 2012/2013

Dental public health epidemiology programme Oral health survey of five-year-old and 12-year-old children attending special support schools 2014

NATIONAL POISONS INFORMATION SERVICE. Combined annual report

The Constitution of the British Association for Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/ME (BACME) CONTENTS. Name of the Organisation. 2. Aims and Objectives

Embargoed until 00:01 GMT on Wednesday 4 April, 2018

Living With and Beyond Cancer where next?

Unlocking evidence of best practice

Current News. Infection reports. Confirmed measles cases (England) to end-august. Respiratory. Immunisation. HIV-STIs

VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM (VTE) IN CANCER PATIENTS CANCER, CHEMOTHERAPY AND CLOTS

Registered childcare providers and places in England, 30 September October 2004

MUSCULOSKELETAL CALCULATOR 42,103. 1in6 SUMMARY. Second Local Authority Bulletin Prevalence of back pain in England and Wolverhampton

Q3 Statistical Report 2017

Ovarian Cancer Guideline. Association of Chartered Physiotherapists in Oncology and Palliative Care

A Measure of Change. Interim Report

VENOUS THROMBOEMBOLISM (VTE) IN CANCER PATIENTS CANCER, CHEMOTHERAPY AND CLOTS

CENTRE FOR CRIME PREVENTION

Provisional 1 monthly topic of interest: Victorian diseases 2

Anglia Stroke and Heart Network

Dorset Cardiac Network

All-Party Parliamentary Group on Dementia inquiry into dementia and co-morbidities - call for evidence

HERTS VALLEYS CCG PALLIATIVE AND END OF LIFE CARE STRATEGY FOR ADULTS AND CHILDREN

WHERE NEXT FOR CANCER SERVICES IN WALES? AN EVALUATION OF PRIORITIES TO IMPROVE PATIENT CARE

INFORMATION TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LINCOLNSHIRE CANCER STRATEGY

Dual Diagnosis. Themed Review Report 2006/07 SHA Regional Reports East Midlands

Circles of Support and Accountability. A community approach to the rehabilitation of Sex Offenders Maxine Myatt, Interim Chief Executive, Circles UK

GRASP-AF- The National Picture. Dr Richard Healicon National Improvement Lead Ian Robson Senior Analyst NHS Improvement February 2012

North of England Cardiovascular Network

Prostate Cancer UK s current campaigns

Implementing the Optimal Lung Cancer Pathway

Hospital Caterers Association

Claire Severgnini Chief executive - National Osteoporosis Society

The autism diagnosis crisis

National Cancer Peer Review Urology Cancer Services Report 2012/2013

Breast Screening Programme, England:

HM Inspectorate of Probation

Children and young people with cancer (quality standard) Stakeholder Abbott Molecular Action for Sick Children Acupuncture Association of Chartered

Sussex Heart Network. David Cunningham Director, Central Cardiac Audit Database. Richard Charles Chairman, Network Device Survey Group

UNDERSTANDING GP ATTITUDES TO CANCER PREVENTING DRUGS FEBRUARY 2017

End of Life Care Strategy

Ref No: AngCN-SSG-Sa9. H:\Cancer Network\Tumour Site\Sarcoma\Peer Review\Active\AngCN-SSG- Sa9_v2_Anglia_Configuration_Sarcoma_Services.

Cheshire & Merseyside Cardiac Network

National Haemoglobinopathy Registry. Annual Report 2017/18

What Happens When Therapy Fails? Therapist Information Sheet

STATISTICAL PRESS NOTICE. DIRECT ACCESS AUDIOLOGY REFERRAL TO TREATMENT (RTT) WAITING TIMES DATA January 2019

National Diabetes Audit

Modernising radiotherapy services in England Public consultation guide

National Diabetes Audit

National Diabetes Foot Care Audit (NDFA) of England and Wales: 2014-

Hospital Caterers Association

National Cancer Intelligence Network Exploring variations in Routes to Diagnosis for gynaecological cancers, 2006 to 2010

Delivering Creative Digital Solutions to the NHS and Health & Care Market. Vanguards, LDPs, STPs and ICOs

The Blue Light project: The story. A report on progress to March 2016

Organ Donation Activity

We need to talk about Palliative Care. Pancreatic Cancer UK

A Future. Demanding action on homelessness. Homeless Health Matters. Our campaign impact

The role of cancer networks in the new NHS

National Diabetes Audit

INFORMATION TO SUPPORT THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE LINCOLNSHIRE CANCER STRATEGY

National Haemoglobinopathy Registry. Annual Report 2015/16. mdsas

WHERE NEXT FOR CANCER SERVICES IN NORTHERN IRELAND? AN EVALUATION OF PRIORITIES TO IMPROVE PATIENT CARE

Funding research for the future

Census of consultant physicians and higher specialty trainees in the UK Palliative medicine

Essex Cardiac and Stroke Network

Psychological Therapies, Annual Report on the use of IAPT services: England 2013/14 EXPERIMENTAL STATISTICS

Evaluation of the Health and Social Care Professionals Programme Interim report. Prostate Cancer UK

Foreword. Our shared principles

Clinical Audit of Heart Rhythm Devices Pacemaker, ICD and CRT Herefordshire and Worcestershire Cardiac Network

Early and locally advanced Breast cancer (review) Stakeholders

West Midlands Sarcoma Advisory Group

Preventing the uptake of smoking by children

Latest Shooting Up report focuses on the changing nature of injecting drug use

Lincolnshire JSNA: Cancer

6: Service considerations a report from the Adult Dental Health Survey 2009

National Cancer Patient Experience Survey Results. East Kent Hospitals University NHS Foundation Trust. Published July 2016

Clinical Audit of Heart Rhythm Devices Pacemaker, ICD and CRT South West London Cardiac Network

A primary care response to domestic abuse from research to mainstream: the IRIS story. Gene Feder. Domestic abuse summit 2018 London 4 th May 2018

Survey of networks and arrangements for HIV clinical care

FROM STRENGTH TO STRENGTH

National Cancer Intelligence Network data usage. 17 November 2015 Veronique Poirier Principal Cancer Analyst NCIN

Engagement Strategy

Other NCAS Providers. Locality Region Organisation responsible Helpline/Contact number. Barking and Dagenham London Pohwer ICAS

National Cancer Intelligence Network Routes to Diagnosis:Investigation of melanoma unknowns

Chairman s Report January 2016

NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Programmes: Evaluation of pilot of Faecal Immunochemical Test : Final report.

East Midlands Cardiac and Stroke Network

National Registry of Childhood Tumours Progress Report, 2010

HEALTHCARE ESSENTIALS CAMPAIGNING FOR BETTER DIABETES CARE

Yorkshire and the Humber Strategic Clinical Networks

Transcription:

Quality care. Everywhere? An audit of prostate cancer services in the UK

Foreword Why should a man who lives in Essex receive worse care and support for prostate cancer than a man who comes from Manchester? Unfortunately, despite improvements in care, men in the United Kingdom continue to face a postcode lottery when accessing prostate cancer services. Prostate Cancer UK has brought together a report detailing the quality of treatment and care experienced by men across the UK. This report, which is the first of its kind, highlights the variation in the care and support men receive. It also provides a crucial benchmark which will help us in the future to make comparisons between the quality of care and support on offer to men today and in one, five and ten years time. Each year, 10,000 men die from prostate cancer and there are over a quarter of a million men living with the disease today. Already the most common cancer in men, prostate cancer is predicted to be the most common cancer in the UK by 2030. Prostate Cancer UK has worked with patients, families, clinicians and policy-makers to develop our Quality Checklist for men with prostate cancer. A quality checklist: Your standards of care outlines the quality of care and support men with prostate cancer should expect to receive, no matter where they live. It is evidence based, patient focused and patient driven, and describes the care that men with prostate cancer should receive at each step, from the point of diagnosis through to end of life care. We hope this report will help commissioners and policy makers see how they are performing compared to other areas in the country and provide a useful starting point to improve the care men receive across the UK. We hope the Quality Checklist will prove to be a useful tool and we urge its adoption. We look forward to working with policy-makers and health services to take forward this report s recommendations to make sure men get the care they deserve. More data and the Quality Checklist can be found on our website: prostatecanceruk.org/qualitycare

Key findings and recommendations Key findings All men with prostate cancer have a right to have the best possible care and support regardless of where they live. Unfortunately, there are significant variations in prostate cancer incidence, patient experience, mortality and survival across the UK. 1. Variation in incidence Wales has the highest prostate cancer incidence rate in the UK, while Scotland has the lowest (see Table 1). There are significant variations in the incidence rate within each country. In England the incidence rate is particularly high in parts of London and Dorset and much lower in the North of England (see Table 2). 2. Patient experience We currently only have patient experience data for men treated in England. While the experiences of men with prostate cancer have improved significantly over the last decade, substantial variations exist between Cancer Networks. It is clear that the information and support needs of many men with prostate cancer are not being met. While around 9 in 10 men with prostate cancer in the best performing Cancer Networks are given the name of a support group, only just over half of men in some Cancer Networks are given this information (see Table 2). Access to specialist nurses, which we know helps to improve men s overall care experience, is also highly variable. Only 4 in 10 men in some Cancer Networks find it easy to get in touch with their specialist nurse. However, in other Cancer Networks more than 8 in 10 men find it easy to do so. This report shows that the information and support that men are getting in some Cancer Network areas is of a consistently high quality. The majority of men living in the Greater Manchester and Cheshire Cancer Network area, for example, are getting good support in virtually all of the patient experience topics examined in this report. However, in other areas, such as Arden and 3 Counties - two Cancer Networks in the West Midlands - and also Essex, there is clear room for improvement. Their patient experience scores are at the bottom end of the scale in almost every measure (see Table 2). 3. Survival and Mortality While prostate cancer survival rates are improving across the UK and mortality rates are broadly falling, there are marked variations between each nation (see Table 1). Wales has the lowest one and five year survival rates but the lowest mortality rate in the UK. While the full picture is unclear, the low mortality rate may show that more low risk prostate cancers are being detected compared to the rest of the UK. However, the low survival rates could mean that men with aggressive disease in Wales may not always be treated in the most effective way. The highest mortality rate is in England. However, the mortality rate varies significantly across the country (see Table 2). For example, in North London the mortality rate is significantly lower than it is in Merseyside and Cheshire. The same variation can also be seen in England s survival rates. There is a six per cent difference between the one year survival rates in the North Trent Cancer Network and the Yorkshire Cancer Network. While a direct correlation between survival and mortality rates and service provision cannot be established, it s reasonable to assume that better and more consistent treatment and support could help improve the prospects of better outcomes across the UK. Recommendations UK Wide Urgent action needs to be taken in each nation of the UK to tackle variations in prostate cancer outcomes identified in this report. There are several specific actions that policy makers and other stateholders can take to address these issues. To address the UK wide variation in prostate cancer outcomes, Prostate Cancer UK s Quality Checklist should be widely adopted. The health service, with support from Prostate Cancer UK and other stakeholders, must ensure that high quality information is available and regularly updated on: men s stage at diagnosis; the uptake of the PSA test and key prostate cancer treatments and drugs; the availability of specialist nurses; patient experience outcomes. This data will help us compare the way in which men are diagnosed, treated and supported in each region and country of the UK. We welcome the launch of the National Prostate Cancer Audit for England and Wales. However it s vital that this data is collected routinely across the whole of the UK so that we can compare men s access to new treatments and procedures between each nation. We welcome the commissioning of a National Cancer Patient Experience Survey in Wales and Northern Ireland. This means that we will have patient experience outcomes for men with prostate cancer in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. However, it s important that these surveys are repeated at regular intervals in each country - and are also closely aligned - so that we can measure change over time and compare the experiences of men in each country. It will also allow us to compare the outcomes of men with prostate cancer with those of people with other common cancers. We have commissioned a Prostate Cancer Patient Experience Survey for Scotland. Our report, which will be published in Spring 2013, will give us valuable data about men s care experiences in Scotland for the first time. However, it s vital that this survey is repeated regularly. We urge the Scottish Government to carry out a National Cancer Patient Experience Survey on similar lines to the ones that have been commissioned in England, Wales and Northern Ireland. It will also allow us to compare the experiences of men with prostate cancer with those of people with other common cancers and measure change over time. Regular surveys of the number of specialist nurses for each tumour type employed in each country and region of the UK also need to be carried out. This data will help us to identify any regional and national differences in access to specialist nurses.

England We have combined prostate cancer incidence, survival, mortality and patient experience data across England to get a picture of how services are performing across the country. There are sharp variations in scores with Cancer Networks in the North of England outperforming Cancer Networks in the Midlands and the South East of England. In particular, different health organisations in England can use available policy levers to drive up the quality of the patient experience and tackle variations. For example: NHS Hospital Trusts in areas with high prostate cancer incidence and patient experience outcomes which are lower than the national average should consider including a prostate cancer specific measure in their Commissioning for Quality and Innovation (CQUIN) payment scheme. The CQUIN scheme, which allows Trusts to gain extra income if they meet their identified CQUIN improvement targets, has become an important tool for driving up NHS performance at local level. Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs) in areas with high prostate cancer incidence should consider including a prostate cancer specific measure in their Quality Premium scheme. The Quality Premium scheme is another key performance improvement tool in the NHS. It works in a similar way as the CQUIN scheme. GPs should make sure that our Quality Checklist and relevant Prostate Cancer UK information materials are made available to men during their Cancer Care Review which should take place six months after diagnosis. The Cancer Care Review is an important opportunity to assess men s information and support needs and to put together a package that s tailored to their needs. Summary of prostate cancer outcomes This section contains two tables. Table 1 provides a picture of the level of prostate cancer incidence, mortality and survival across the whole of the UK. Table 2 focuses on patient experience outcomes of men with prostate cancer in England. This is because we don t yet have patient experience data for Scotland, Wales or Northern Ireland. The table brings together the data from the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey for each Cancer Network in England and also local prostate cancer incidence, mortality and survival data i. It also includes a score for each Cancer Network which allows us to produce an overall ranking of Cancer Networks. A complete set of results can be found on our website prostatecanceruk.org/qualitycare including maps of prostate cancer incidence, survival and mortality in England, Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland and a series of maps of patient experience outcomes by Cancer Network in England. Table 1: Prostate Cancer incidence, survival and mortality rates across the UK incidence rate per 100,000 men ii One year survival for prostate cancer (%) iii Five year survival for prostate cancer (%) iv mortality rate per 100,000 men v England 106.4 95 83 23.8 Scotland 82.1 94 80 23.7 Wales 114.0 93 77 22.8 Northern Ireland 96.5 96 83 23.5 UK 104.5 95 82 23.8 i Department of Health (2012) National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2011/2012 www.dh.gov.uk/health/2012/08/cancer-experience-survey/ ii Cancer Research UK (2013) Prostate Cancer Incidence Rates per 100,000 population in 2010. Accessed 6 March 2013. Available at http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/prostate/incidence/ iii National Cancer Intelligence Network (2011) One-year relative survival estimate, males, ICD10 C61 : Prostate, 2004-2008. Accessed 10 January 2013. Available here: http://www.ncin.org.uk/cancer_information_tools/eatlas/pct/atlas.html?select=eav&indicator=i0 iv National Cancer Intelligence Network (2011), Five-year relative survival estimate, males, ICD10 C61 : Prostate, 2004-2008. Accessed 10 January 2013. Available here: http://www.ncin.org.uk/cancer_information_tools/eatlas/pct/atlas.html?select=eav&indicator=i0 v Cancer Research UK (2012) Prostate Cancer Mortality Rates per 100,000 population in 2010 http://www.cancerresearchuk.org/cancer-info/cancerstats/types/prostate/mortality/

Table 2: Prostate Cancer incidence, mortality, survival and patient experience outcomes of Cancer Networks in England (See next page for explanation of data used in this table) Cancer Network incidence rate per 100,000 men vi One year survival mortaity rate per estimate (%) 100,000 men viii vii Staff gave complete explanation of purpose of test(s) ix Patient given written information about their cancer type Patient given a choice of different types of treatment Patient finds it easy to contact their CNS Hospital staff gave information about support groups Patient offered written assessment and care plan Composite score of outcomes Greater Manchester & Cheshire 98.04 22.78 94.97 91% 83% 95% 75% 88% 22% 5 Anglia 107.44 24.00 96.14 90% 85% 88% 73% 87% 23% 3 Sussex 94.86 24.78 94.62 83% 82% 91% 77% 86% 28% 3 Kent and Medway 98.76 24.82 93.52 89% 84% 91% 76% 91% 31% 2 Mount Vernon 94.12 23.63 95.08 82% 75% 88% 77% 88% 23% 2 North London 118.57 23.75 96.70 93% 81% 97% 68% 80% 22% 2 North Trent 89.16 24.80 91.19 87% 81% 98% 85% 89% 21% 2 Yorkshire Cancer Network 111.32 23.69 97.00 92% 79% 94% 58% 86% 26% 2 Lancashire and South Cumbria 95.79 21.21 95.45 79% 75% 89% 74% 81% 22% 1 North of England 86.31 24.73 95.44 84% 80% 84% 79% 76% 32% 1 Pan Birmingham 108.44 23.74 96.06 84% 81% 96% 69% 82% 29% 1 South West London 106.72 21.77 95.99 89% 80% 92% 65% 82% 26% 1 Surrey, West Sussex and Hampshire 98.08 22.45 94.53 89% 83% 90% 80% 88% 18% 1 Thames Valley 109.62 24.04 94.69 89% 83% 93% 46% 88% 15% 1 Central South Coast 94.39 22.76 94.14 76% 74% 89% 68% 82% 22% 0 Humber and Yorkshire Coast 98.59 23.97 96.11 86% 71% 82% 86% 70% 28% 0 North West London 91.46 20.69 95.50 -- 64% 84% -- -- -- 0 Peninsula 99.18 25.80 93.42 87% 74% 85% 77% 90% 26% 0 South East London 115.44 24.46 94.95 88% 79% 92% 61% 87% 37% 0 Avon, Somerset and Wiltshire 111.29 24.57 94.19 88% 79% 92% 80% 85% 25% -1 Greater Midlands 97.45 24.20 96.23 73% 81% 88% 55% 86% 23% -1 Merseyside and Cheshire 98.43 27.69 95.43 83% 81% 85% 72% 82% 27% -1 Dorset 127.58 24.63 96.85 60% 76% 93% -- 78% 18% -2 East Midlands 99.68 25.65 93.61 87% 79% 88% 70% 78% 24% -2 North East London 98.88 21.46 94.73 70% 67% 88% 55% 64% 26% -3 Essex 92.98 23.92 95.56 72% 69% 85% 57% 80% 19% -4 Arden 102.80 25.33 97.50 70% 61% 71% 52% 65% 19% -6 3Counties 105.90 25.35 95.86 70% 50% 67% 41% 55% 11% -7

Explanation to Table 2 Table 2 includes three sets of data: The prostate cancer incidence, mortality and survival outcomes from each Cancer Network in England (columns 2-4). In each column the highest and lowest performing 25% of Cancer Networks are highlighted in green and black respectively. The results from six key questions in the National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2011/12 for each Cancer Network in England that directly relate to our Quality Checklist (columns 5-10). In each column the highest and lowest performing 25% of Cancer Networks are highlighted in green and black respectively. A combined score (column 11) for each Cancer Network in England which is based on the outcomes in columns 2-10. Each Cancer Network is given a plus one score or a minus one score for each outcome in the highest and lowest performing 25% of Cancer Networks to arrive at a combined score. Notes 3 Counties Cancer Network covers parts of Worcestershire, Herefordshire and Gloucestershire Arden Cancer Network covers parts of Warwickshire and Worcestershire Mount Vernon covers Hertfordshire, Luton and South Bedfordshire Peninsula Cancer Network covers Devon and Cornwall Next steps Our report has focused largely on prostate cancer outcomes in England. This is because we don t yet have patient experience data for Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland. We have shown that many men with prostate cancer in England are receiving very good care, information and support. However, our report has also revealed that there are real variations around the country in terms of the care and support on offer to men. Tackling this variation is one of our key priorities. We want to ensure that all men with prostate cancer have access to high quality care and support, regardless of where they live. Over the next few years we will be working closely with NHS Trusts, Clinical Commissioning Groups and Local Authorities across England to ensure that the standards in our Quality Checklist are implemented. We will also be working with Health Boards in Scotland, Wales and Northern Ireland to ensure our Quality Checklist is implemented. In Scotland we have also commissioned a Prostate Cancer Patient Experience Survey. This report, which will be published in Spring 2013, will give us a better understanding of Scottish men s care and support experiences. National and local politicians also have an important role to play in tackling the variations we have found across the UK and ensuring that our standards are implemented. We invite politicians of all parties to work with us to ensure that all men get the care and support they deserve. To find out more about our work and to get involved please call our Campaigns Team on 0208 222 7622 or email campaigns@prostatecanceruk.org vi National Cancer Intelligence Network (2011) Cancer incidence rate males, ICD10 C61: Prostate, 2006-2008. Accessed 10 January 2013. Available at http://www.ncin.org.uk/cancer_information_tools/eatlas/network/atlas.html?select=eav&indicator=i0 vii National Cancer Intelligence Network (2011) One-year relative survival estimate, males, ICD10 C61 : Prostate, 2004-2008. Accessed 10 January 2013. Available at http://www.ncin.org.uk/cancer_information_tools/eatlas/network/atlas.html?select=eav&indicator=i0 viii National Cancer Intelligence Network (2011) Cancer mortality males, ICD10 C61: Prostate, 2006-2008. Accessed 10 January 2013. Available at http://www.ncin.org.uk/cancer_information_tools/eatlas/network/atlas.html?select=eav&indicator=i0 ix Data in columns 5-10 is taken from Department of Health (2012) National Cancer Patient Experience Survey 2011/2012. Available at www.dh.gov.uk/health/2012/08/cancer-experience-survey/

1772 Prostate Cancer UK is a registered charity in England and Wales (1005541) and in Scotland (SC039332). A company limited by guarantee registered number 2653887 (England and Wales). VAT 905 9415 18.