OUTCOME OF THROMBOLYTIC AND NON- THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Similar documents
ST-elevation myocardial infarctions (STEMIs)

Current Advances and Best Practices in Acute STEMI Management A pharmacoinvasive approach

Cardiovascular Disorders Lecture 3 Coronar Artery Diseases

Acute coronary syndromes

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 35, No. 4, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /00/$20.

Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Myocardial Infarction In Dr.Yahya Kiwan

Diagnosis and Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction

4. Which survey program does your facility use to get your program designated by the state?

PRIMARY CORONARY ANGIOPLASTY VERSUS INTRAVENOUS THROMBOLYSIS FOR ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION - A COMPARATIVE STUDY AT QUEEN ALIA HEART INSTITUTE

DISCUSSION QUESTION - 1

Practitioner Education Course

Emergency physician versus cardiologistinitiated thrombolysis for acute myocardial infarction: a Singapore experience

Subsequent management and therapies

Journal of the American College of Cardiology Vol. 37, No. 6, by the American College of Cardiology ISSN /01/$20.

12 Lead EKG Chapter 4 Worksheet

STEMI ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction

Results of Ischemic Heart Disease

NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR HEALTH AND CLINICAL EXCELLENCE SCOPE

Early discharge in selected patients after an acute coronary syndrome can it be safe?

1 a) Please confirm or deny whether your Trust has admitted patients for acute myocardial infarction in 2008/09, 2009/10 or 2010/11

Inter-regional differences and outcome in unstable angina

When the learner has completed this module, she/he will be able to:

The First 12 Hours. ST-Segment Elevation AMI: Introduction. Definitions

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. STUDY OF ARRHYTHMIAS IN ACUTE INFERIOR WALL MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION Ravikumar T. N 1, Anikethana G. V 2

Facilitated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Acute Myocardial Infarction. Is it beneficial to patients?

Target vessel only revascularization versus complet revascularization in non culprit lesions in acute myocardial infarction treated by primary PCI

The Strategic Reperfusion Early After STEMI study Implications for clinical practice

Critics of Thrombolytics: Is Pre-Hospital Clot-busting Actually a Bad Thing? David Persse, MD Houston Fire Department EMS

LEFT VENTRICULAR THROMBUS IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION

Objectives. Acute Coronary Syndromes; The Nuts and Bolts. Overview. Quick quiz.. How dose the plaque start?

Tobacco Consumption and Acute Myocardial Infarction

International Journal of Biological & Medical Research. Study of Arrhythmias Associated With Acute Myocardial Infarction And Mortality

Complications of Acute Myocardial Infarction

CLINICIAN INTERVIEW RECOGNIZING ACS AND STRATIFYING RISK IN PRIMARY CARE. An interview with A. Michael Lincoff, MD, and Eric R. Bates, MD, FACC, FAHA

Time delays in instituting thrombolysis in acute myocardial infarction - a Singapore perspective

A Report From the Second National Registry of Myocardial Infarction (NRMI-2)

Ischemic heart disease

Supplementary material 1. Definitions of study endpoints (extracted from the Endpoint Validation Committee Charter) 1.

Improving the Outcomes of

ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction- Latest AHA recommendations

Indications of Coronary Angiography Dr. Shaheer K. George, M.D Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University 2014

Transfer in D2B. Scott D Friedman, MD FACC Medical Director, Cardiology Services Shore Health System of Maryland. The Problem

DR ALEXIA STAVRATI CARDIOLOGIST, DIRECTOR OF CARDIOLOGY DEPT, "G. PAPANIKOLAOU" GH, THESSALONIKI

Medicine Dr. Omed Lecture 2 Stable and Unstable Angina

Acute Coronary Syndromes

Andreas Baumbach Bristol Heart Institute Bristol Royal Infirmary. London 27/1/2005

Electrocardiography. Hilal Al Saffar College of Medicine,Baghdad University

2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction

An Open Randomized Study Prague-5 ˆ

Case Study 50 YEAR OLD MALE WITH UNSTABLE ANGINA

Acute myocardial infarction. Cardiovascular disorders. main/0202_new 02/03/06. Search date August 2004 Nicholas Danchin and Eric Durand

The restoration of coronary flow after an

Safety of Single- Versus Multi-vessel Angioplasty for Patients with AMI and Multi-vessel CAD

ORIGINAL ARTICLE. Rescue PCI Versus a Conservative Approach for Failed Fibrinolysis in Patients with STEMI

ACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME PCI IN THE ELDERLY

Is it safe to discharge patients 24 hours after uncomplicated successful primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Acute Coronary Syndrome. Sonny Achtchi, DO

ECG in coronary artery disease. By Sura Boonrat Central Chest Institute

Clinical Seminar. Which Diabetic Patient is a Candidate for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention - European Perspective

Acute Coronary syndrome

Common Codes for ICD-10

Hospital and 1-year outcome after acute myocardial infarction in patients with diabetes mellitus and hypertension

Prolonged Oral Morphine Therapy for Severe Angina Pectoris

Influence of Treatment Delay on Infarct Size and Clinical Outcome in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Treated With Primary Angioplasty

The MAIN-COMPARE Study

Richard Grocott Mason

9/24/2013. Thrombolytics in 2013: Never Say Never. September 19 th, 2013 Scott M Lilly, MD PhD. Clinical Case

Quality Improvement Report

Prognostic significance of troponin T in acute myocardial infarction

APPENDIX F: CASE REPORT FORM

Should All Patients Be Treated with Ace-inh /ARB after STEMI with Preserved LV Function?

Sustained Benefit 20 Years After Reperfusion Therapy in Acute Myocardial Infarction

William D. Salerno, M.D. Director, Coronary Care Unit Hackensack University Medical Center Clinical Associate Professor of Medicine, UMDNJ

The development of cardiogenic shock portends an extremely poor prognosis. Cardiogenic Shock: A Lethal Complication of Acute Myocardial Infarction

Management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction Update 2009 Late comers: which options?

Cindy Stephens, MSN, ANP Kelly Walker, MS, ACNP Peter Cohn, MD, FACC

The Window for Fibrinolysis. Frans Van de Werf, MD, PhD Leuven, Belgium

Patient Transfer. Mark de Belder The James Cook University Hospital Middlesbrough

Mega-trials and equivalence trials: experience from the INJECT study

Myocardial infarction

Acute Coronary Syndrome in Phrae Hospital

Effect of upstream clopidogrel treatment in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction undergoing primary PCI

Myocardial Infarction. Reading Assignment (p66-78 in Outline )

MYOCARDIALINFARCTION. By: Kendra Fischer

The PAIN Pathway for the Management of Acute Coronary Syndrome

1/3/2008. Karen Burke Priscilla LeMone Elaine Mohn-Brown. Medical-Surgical Nursing Care, 2e Karen Burke, Priscilla LeMone, and Elaine Mohn-Brown

Annie Chou Internal Medicine PGY3 University of British Columbia. Rocky Mountain Internal Medicine Conference November 24, 2011

From interventional cardiology to cardio-neurology. A new subspeciality

form of ACS, accounting for 25%-40% of MI presentations with in-hospital mortality of 5%-6% in the developed countries. 5

Recurrent Thrombosis in a Case of Coronary Ectasia with Large Thrombus Burden Successfully Treated by Adjunctive Warfarin Therapy

NEBRASKA STEMI CONFERENCE 2015 Dr. Doug Kosmicki. 2013, American Heart Association

Coronary Interventions Indications, Treatment Options and Outcomes

UPDATE ON THE MANAGEMENTACUTE CORONARY SYNDROME. DR JULES KABAHIZI, Psc (Rwa) Lt Col CHIEF CONSULTANT RMH/KFH 28 JUNE18

ECG Workshop. Nezar Amir

Prediction of the Site of Coronary Artery Lesion in Acute Inferior Myocardial Infarction with Right Sided Precordial Lead (V4r)

Cardiovascular Health Nova Scotia Update to Antiplatelet Sections of the Nova Scotia Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndromes, 2008.

CLINCIAL APPLICATION OF GUIDELINES IN HEART FAILURE

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Nova Scotia Guidelines for Acute Coronary Syndromes (Updating the 2008 Antiplatelet Section of the Guidelines)

Transcription:

OUTCOME OF THROMBOLYTIC AND NON- THROMBOLYTIC THERAPY IN ACUTE MYOCARDIAL INFARCTION FEROZ MEMON*, LIAQUAT CHEEMA**, NAND LAL RATHI***, RAJ KUMAR***, NAZIR AHMED MEMON**** OBJECTIVE: To compare morbidity, in hospital mortality and benefits of Streptokinase (SK) therapy and Non- Streptokinase (non-sk) therapy in acute myocardial infarction patients. METHODS: Retrospective review of the medical record of 300 patients with all types of acute MI admitted in our CCU between Nov. 2000-April 2001. RESUTLS: Out of 300 patients, 210 (70%) were male and 90 (30%) were female. 150 (50%) were given SK therapy and 150 (50%) did not receive SK therapy because they did not qualify. Mean age was 55 years. The success of SK therapy was judged indirectly through non-invasive measures. LIMITATIONS: This data is from a hospital which does not have invasive or PCI facilities, hence it was totally dependant on non-invasive measures. However, this might help in patient management in our society where most hospitals/ccus do not have invasive facilities. CONCLUSION: The overall survey shows that not only mortality was improved in SK group but also patients had less complications, early pain relief and shorter hospital stay. However, due to higher earlier event rate in SK group, these patients should preferably be referred to a facility having interventional support. KEY WORDS: SK verses non-sk therapy, Acute Myocardial Infarction (MI) and related complications, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) INTRODUCTION * Prof. of Cardiology, Isra University Hospital Hyderabad. ** Associate Prof of Cardiology, NICVD Karachi. *** PG, MD LUMHS, Jamshoro **** Chairman and Prof of Cardiology LUMHS Jamshoro Patients with acute MI have better outcome with SK therapy compared to non-sk therapy, especially when given within 3 hours. However, benefits within 12 hours of chest pain have been reported (1). Aspirin when given with SK therapy reduces reinfarction and improves survival (2). In GUSTO trial, deaths and non-fatal strokes were 6.9% for accelerated TPA, 7.7% for SK with subcutaneous heparin and 7.9% for SK with IV heparin. Other international trials have reported complication rates from 3.7% to 10.7% (1,2,3,5,6). In our own practice we do observe immediate benefits with SK therapy. However, more frequent rehospitalizations for post-mi Angina, re-infarction and 56

arrhythmia are noticed. This is considered to be due to persistence of culprit lesions with viable myocardium after SK therapy. There are some concerns regarding complications associated with SK therapy especially in a setting without interventional support. As such a comparative study was warranted in the usual CCU setting having no invasive and interventional facilities. This study was done by reviewing the record of hospitalized patients with acute MI with reliable serial ECGs pattern and laboratory investigations. In-hospital complications and mortality were compared including recommendations for further aggressive interventional management at suitable facility. METHODS: Retrospective medical record of 300 patients was reviewed with all types of acute MI admitted in our CCU between Nov. 2000 to April 2001; among them 150 patients received SK therapy and 150 patients did not receive SK therapy. 210 (70%) were males and 90 (30%) were females. Patients who met the following criteria were included in the study: 1. History of typical pain for myocardial infarction. 2. ST-segment elevation of more than 1mm in two or more consecutive ECG leads & or Q-waves. 3. Biochemical markers. In follow-up clinic, available data was reviewed for reported events. RESULTS: Out of 300 patients, 210 (70%) were male and 90 (30%) were female. 50% were given SK therapy and 50% did not receive SK therapy. The results of success of SK therapy were judged indirectly such as relief of pain, early normalization of ECG changes, status of "R waves", early rise and fall of specific cardiac enzymes and APTT. We do not have facility for invasive diagnostic methods like PAKISTAN HEART JOURNAL angiography, however we did offer pre-discharge ETT services but unfortunately majority of patients refused due to apprehension of complications. Most patients still believe in old fashioned strict rest for 6 weeks. Average age was 55 years (33-77 Yr). On further break-up, 40(13%) were under 40 years, 230 (76.6%) in between 40-65 years while remaining 30 (10%) were above 65 years of age. 90 (30%) patients arrived within 3 hours after symptoms, 42 (14%) between 4-6 hours, 18 (6%) between 7-12 hours and 150 (50%) came after 12 hours (Table-I). On risk factors analysis, cigarette smokers dominated, being 99 (33%), hypertensive 60 (20%), diabetic 42 (14%), high cholesterol/dyslipidemia in 24 (8%) and family history of ischemic heart disease in 17 (5.6%). 60 (20%) had no risk factors and 150 (50%) had 2 or more risk factors (Table-II). Out of 300 patients, 105 (35%) suffered extensive anterior wall MI, 90 (30%) had anterior-septal MI. Cardiac enzymes were done in all patients for 3 consecutive days, 144 (48%) patients had an initial rise with early normalization of enzymes while 111 (37%) had marked rise and in 45 (15%) patients, minimal rise in cardiac enzymes was noted (Table- III). At discharge 102 (32%) patients had normal ECG with no Q wave, 48 (16%) had preserved R wave in presence of tiny Q waves while 150 (50%) showed definite Q waves. 42 (14%) patients had reappearance of R waves (Table-IV). During SK therapy in 150 (50%) patients, 9 (6%) patients experienced bleeding. In this group, 5 patients (3%) died due to uncontrolled bleeding. 16 (10.6%) patients had episodes of arrhythmia (Including ventricular tachycardia, ventricular fibrillation, premature ventricular contractions, atrial premature contractions, complete heart block, reperfusion arrhythmia). 12 (8%) of these died. 7 (4.7%) patients developed stroke, 3 (2%) had transit ischemia attacks, 3 (2%) suffered anaphylactic reactions and 12 (8%) developed miscellaneous complications. 57

Following SK therapy, 3 (2%) patients developed heart block, 6(4%) developed arrhythmia, 3 (2%) developed heart failure, 7 (4%) developed Cardiogenic shock, 2 (1.33%) developed Pericarditis, 1 (0.66%) developed thromboembolic phenomenon and 12 (8.00%) patients died (Table-V). Among patients who were not given SK therapy, 3 (2%) developed Pericarditis, 4 (2.66%) developed mechanical complications. (Table - V). In patients without SK therapy, there were 24 (16%) deaths. In all 36 patients who died, 22 were in age group of 41-65 years. 19 patients suffered extensive anterior wall MI, 9 had inferior wall MI (Table - VI). DISCUSSION: Various studies have reported variable mortality and morbidity rates on SK therapy in comparison with placebo. In trails per GISSI 10.7% vs 13%; ISAM 5.9% vs 7%; ISIS 9.2% vs 12%; White 3.7% vs 12.5% and West Washington 6.3% vs 9.7% 58

PAKISTAN HEART JOURNAL mortalities were reported on SK therapy and placebo respectively (1,2,3,5,6). In our setup, mortality in streptokinase group was 8.00%, while in non-streptokinase population, it was 16%. This significant difference is similar to other studies (1,2,3,). Following successful Thrombolytic therapy in acute myocardial infarction, an early rise and fall in creatinine kinase level has been reported (7). This fact was observed in our patients where 48% patients showed early rise and fall. Most of our patients experienced instant pain relief and early settling of ST-segments than in nonstreptokinase group. Our unit covers the need of cardiac patients in the radius of about 400km; hence the time-scale of patients' arrival has always been a problem. Early intervention within 6 hours reduces infarct size (8). This fact is no appreciated by our population. Also they are unable to meet the time demand due to transportation and communication problems. Rate of re-infarction and number of ischemic events are higher in streptokinase population. 25-50% of infarct related arteries remain occluded despite therapy. Higher success rate of 92% and lower occlusion rate of 4% have been observed in patients with angioplasty after thrombolysis. TAMI, 1 trial results show slightly less success rate of 73%. Identification of (10%) high risk patients can benefit from invasive interventional procedure following thrombolysis. CONCLUSION: As reported in other studies; with streptokinase therapy, there was a clear trend towards improvement in mortality and morbidity in this study. During hospitalization these patients had earlier relief in chest pain and less complications. They were discharged earlier without significant apprehension. By resuming their duty earlier, this group suffered less work-loss. For best results, early referral to a coronary care unit is encouraged following suspected symptoms of acute MI. Smoking was the most prevalent major risk factor. Anti-smoking campaign should be taken up at higher level and revitalized by definite no-smoking 59

zones in public areas. Among those who attended the follow-up clinic, it was noted that SK therapy patients had more events during 3 to 6 months post MI period. These unstable patients are strong candidates for further invasive/interventional procedures at suitable facility. Unfortunately, due to lack of resources, unknown fear and logistic reasons, most patients avoid interventional procedures and continue suffering from preventable complications despite immediate benefits after SK therapy. REFERENCES 1. (GISSI) Effectiveness of I/V thrombolytics treatment in acute MI. LANCET 1986:1:397-401. 2. ISIS 2 (Second International study of infarct survival) collaboration group). LANCET 1988;2:349-60. 3. ISAM study group. A prospective trail of I/V streptokinase in acute MI. New Eng J Med 1986; 314; 1465-71. 4. DE Wood MA, Spores J et al. Coronary arteriographic finding in acute transmural infarction. Circulation 1983; 68;39-49. 5. White, HD, Norris RM et al. Effect of I/V streptokinase on left ventricular function, early survival after acute MI. N Eng. J Med. 1987;317;850-5. 6. Kennedy JW, Davies KB et al. The Western Washington I/V streptokinase in acute MI, randomized trail. Circulation 1988;77:345-52. 7. Isobe M, Ueda S et al. Quantitative relationship between left ventricular function, serum cardiac myosin light chain level after coronary reperfusion in patients with acute MI. Circulation 1987;76:1251-61. 8. Simons ML, Brand M et al. Early thrombolysis in acute MI. Limitation of infarction size and improvement in survival. J. Am Coll. 1986;7:17-28. 9. EL-Deeb ME, EL Gamal et al. Early and late outcome of combined I/V thrombolysis, PTCA in acute MI. Nen J Cardiol 1988;1:31. 10. Callifrm, George BS et al. Characteristic and outcome of patients in whom reperfusion with I/V tissue type plasminogen activator fails; results of thrombolysis, Angioplasty in MI. (TAMI trials Circulation 1988;77:1098. 60